Journal of Siberian Federal University. Biology 2023 16(2): 232-251
EDN: SELYZZ УДК 577.19+577.29
Using SAR Methodology for Identification of Freshwater Macrophyte Allelochemicals with High Anti-Cyanobacterial Effect against Planktonic Cyanobacteria
Evgeny A. Kurashov"' с *, Elena V. Fedorovab, Julia V. Krylovaa' c' Larisa L. Kapustinaa, Galina G. Mitrukovaa' d and Elena V. Protopopovaa
a Institute of Lake Science of the RAS, a separate subdivision of the St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the RAS Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation b Quantori, Global Headquarters Cambridge, USA
c Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, RAS
Borok, Russian Federation d Saint-Petersburg State Chemical and Pharmaceutical University
Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Received 17.08.2022, received in revised form 14.02.2023, accepted 12.04.2023
Abstract. Controlling harmful cyanobacterial "blooms" through developing a new generation of algaecides based on allelochemical substances is a challenge facing modern aquatic ecology and biotechnology. The present article is devoted to the use of the SAR (Structure-Activity-Relationship) information technology to identify allelochemicals from aquatic macrophytes (floating-leaved Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm. and several species of submerged macrophytes: Ceratophyllum demersum L., Myriophyllum spicatum L., Elodea canadensis Michx, and species of the genus Potamogeton) effective against planktonic cyanobacteria. Detection and identification of compounds were performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The PASS (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances) computer program has been applied to predict biological activity spectra of the major components of macrophyte metabolomes and discover their ecological potential against cyanobacteria. A study of the biological activities of major low-molecular-weight organic compounds showed that monocarboxylic acids, gallic acid, cis-6-octadecenoic acid,
© Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Corresponding author E-mail address: evgeny_kurashov@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-4486-2804 (Kurashov E.); 0000-0003-1667-5240 (Fedorova E.); 0000-0002-4274-2358 (Krylova J.); 0000-0002-7135-3300 (Kapustina L.); 0000-0002-4128-7840 (Mitrukova G.); 0000-0001-5376-7019 (Protopopova E.)
cis-9-octadecenoic acid, palmitoleic acid, linolenic acid, and 9-cis-12-cis-linoleic acid are the most promising compounds for the experimental verification and creation of nature-like algaecides of a new generation. PASS predictions were successfully compared to the available information on the biological activity of those compounds and confirmed experimentally. The present study shows that some organic acids significantly inhibit the growth of Synechocystis aquatilis Sauvageau and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae Ralfs ex Bornet and Flahault and can be used as algaecides for suppression of cyanobacteria. The inhibitory effect of the combined mixture of these allelochemicals is stronger than the effect of each individual component, suggesting that there are various mechanisms of cyanobacterial growth inhibition.
Keywords: SAR, PASS, allelopathy, allelochemicals, macrophytes, cyanobacteria, fatty acids, algaecides.
Acknowledgments. The publication of the results of the study was funded by Grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 22-24-00658, https://rscf.ru/project/22-24-00658. We also express gratitude to the Resource Center «Cultivation of Microorganisms» at St. Petersburg State University for providing the culture of Synechocystis aquatilis for experiments.
Citation: Kurashov E. A., Fedorova E. V., Krylova J. V., Kapustina L. L., Mitrukova G. G., Protopopova E. V. Using SAR methodology for identification of freshwater macrophyte allelochemicals with high anti-cyanobacterial effect against planktonic cyanobacteria. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Biol., 2023, 16(2), 232-251. EDN: SELYZZ
Использование методологии SAR для идентификации аллелохемиков пресноводных макрофитов с высоким антицианобактериальным эффектом в отношении планктонных цианобактерий
E. А. Курашов а' в, E. В. Фёдорова б, Ю. В. Крылова а' в, Л. Л. Капустина а, Г. Г. Митрукова а' г, E. В. Протопопова а
аИнститут озероведения РАН, обособленное подразделение Санкт-Петербургского федерального исследовательского центра РАН
Российская Федерация, Санкт-Петербург бКвантори, Штаб-квартира США, Кембридж
вИнститут биологии внутренних вод им. И. Д. Папанина РАН
Российская Федерация, п. Борок гСанкт-Петербургский государственный химико-фармацевтический университет Минздрава России Российская Федерация, Санкт-Петербург
Аннотация. Проблема борьбы с опасными цианобактериальными «цветениями» посредством разработки нового поколения альгицидов, основанных на аллелохемиках растений, актуальна
на современной стадии развития водной экологии и биотехнологии. Статья посвящена использованию информационной технологии SAR (связь структура - активность) для выявления эффективных аллелохемиков водных макрофитов (с плавающими листьями - Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm., и нескольких видов погруженных макрофитов: Ceratophyllum demersum L., Myriophyllum spicatum L., Elodea canadensis Michx и виды рода Potamogeton) против планктонных цианобактерий. Обнаружение и идентификацию соединений проводили с использованием метода газовой хромато-масс-спектрометрии. Компьютерная программа PASS (прогнозирование спектров активности для веществ) была применена для прогнозирования спектров биологической активности мажорных компонентов метаболома макрофитов, чтобы обнаружить их экологический потенциал против цианобактерий. Изучение биологической активности основных низкомолекулярных органических соединений показало, что монокарбоновые кислоты, галловая кислота, цис-6-октадеценовая кислота, цис-9-октадеценовая кислота, пальмитолеиновая кислота, линоленовая кислота и 9-цис-12-цис-линолевая кислота являются наиболее перспективными соединениями для экспериментальной проверки и создания природоподобных альгицидов нового поколения. Прогнозные оценки PASS были успешно сопоставлены с доступной информацией о биологической активности этих соединений, а также подтверждены экспериментально. Было показано, что некоторые жирные кислоты значительно ингибировали рост Synechocystis aquatilis Sauvageau и Aphanizomenon flos-aque Ralfs ex Bornet and Flahault и могут использоваться в качестве альгицидов для подавления цианобактерий. Поскольку ингибирующий эффект комбинированной смеси аллелохемиков был сильнее, чем у отдельных компонентов, имеются основания предполагать, что существуют различные механизмы ингибирования роста цианобактерий.
Ключевые слова: SAR, PASS, аллелопатия, аллелохемики, макрофиты, цианобактерии, жирные кислоты, альгициды.
Благодарности. Публикация результатов исследования поддержана грантом РНФ No. 22-2400658, https://rscf.ru/project/22-24-00658. Также выражается благодарность Ресурсному центру «Культивирование микроорганизмов» СПБГУ за предоставление культуры S. aquatilis для экспериментов.
Цитирование: Курашов, Е. А. Использование методологии SAR для идентификации аллелохемиков пресноводных макрофитов с высоким антицианобактериальным эффектом в отношении планктонных цианобактерий / E. А. Курашов, E. В. Фёдорова, Ю. В. Крылова, Л. Л. Капустина, Г Г Митрукова, E. В. Протопопова // Журн. Сиб. федер. ун-та. Биология, 2023. 16(2). С. 232-251. EDN: SELYZZ
Introduction
Allelopathy is considered a natural phenomenon for both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of one plant upon another, including microorganisms (Mushtaq et al., 2020; Asif et al., 2021; Sliwinska-Wilczewska et al., 2021). Functionally, plants have developed several
strategies for interacting with other organisms for self-defense, symbiosis, and sexual attraction (Zhou et al., 2022). The production, accumulation, and release of primary and secondary metabolites (low-molecular-weight organic compounds (LMWOCs)) by aquatic and semiaquatic plants, which inhibit and/or stimulate germination and development
of other plants and microorganisms, is an important mechanism in the interactions between these organisms (Fink, 2007; Li et al., 2020). LMWOCs constitute part of the low-molecular-weight metabolome of aquatic plants and are extremely important for forming hydrobiological communities, thus acting as regulatory agents in aquatic ecosystems (Gurevich, 1978; Fink, 2007; Kurashov et al., 2014; Koksharova, 2020), as well as in terrestrial ecosystems (Allelopathy ..., 2013).
Aquatic macrophytes are one of the critical components of inland waters, which fulfill the most important function in formation of the environment. Allelopathic interactions are carried out by synthesising specific compounds -allelochemicals (including volatile substances). In particular, several macrophyte species are active producers of allelochemicals inhibiting the development of phytoplankton in shallow lakes (Hilt, Gross, 2008; Zhou et al., 2019; Zeng et al., 2022).
Despite the importance of this phenomenon in nature, higher plant allelopathy in aquatic habitats has been much less studied than in terrestrial ecosystems, although it should be considered the most important regulatory factor in the dynamics and composition of phytoplankton communities (Cyanobacteria., 2013; Co-Evolution ..., 2020). It has been well reported that allelochemical metabolites can be considered natural algaecides (Hu, Hong, 2008; Balaji-Prasath et al., 2022) and must be the basis of a nature-like convergent technology to suppress the development of cyanobacteria and to prevent "blooms" in water bodies. A number of macrophytes have been reported to contain anti-algal and anti-cyanobacterial compounds (Amorim et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). These results indicate that some macrophytes can be used to control algal and cyanobacterial growth.
To understand the mechanism of the growth inhibition of cyanobacteria by the allelopathic
effect of macrophytes, allelochemicals must be identified. At the same time, they can be characterized by many biological effects, which are very difficult to verify experimentally. Moreover, previous studies showed that the number of compounds in aquatic macrophytes can reach more than 200 (Kurashov et al., 2014, 2018). Therefore, it is appropriate to use bio- and cheminformatics approaches.
Developing new biologically active compounds with potential practical applications is one of the most complex and difficult tasks. Experimental testing of the interaction of many chemical compounds with thousands of molecular targets is impossible from an economic and practical perspective. Computer bioinformatic program PASS (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances) allows researchers to screen large libraries of chemicals for compounds with desired properties and experimentally test those predicted to be active. So far as there is a relationship between structure and activity, and this principle is called SAR (Structure-Activity-Relationship) in this study, we aim to conduct SAR analysis using a PASS computer program to predict the biological activity spectra of LMWOCs and their mechanisms of action. The PASS computer system can simultaneously predict several hundred types of biological activities (Filimonov et al., 2014, 2018; Poroikov et al., 2019). The prediction is based on the SAR analysis of the training set, which is regularly updated with data on new chemicals and their known biological activities. Once trained, PASS can predict for a test compound all likely biological activities that are included in the training set. In recent years, the use of SAR to identify biological activities for natural compounds has become increasingly widespread (Gillbro et al., 2015; Lagunin et al., 2016; Khameneh et al., 2019; Fattahian et al., 2020). One example is
the identification of natural antioxidants from marine algae that could be developed for further industrial applications (Kelman et al., 2012).
The present study aims to identify allelochemicals released from the floating-leaved Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm. and several species of submerged macrophytes - Ceratophyllum demersum L., Myriophyllum spicatum L., Elodea canadensis Michx., and species of genus Potamogeton - and to choose among them compounds with the most probable allelopathic potential for suppressing cyanobacteria using SAR methodology.
To achieve these goals, several major LMWOCs (> 1 % of the content of total LMWOCs) predicted by PASS were selected from the metabolome of freshwater macrophytes, and then they were tested in vitro against two species of cyanobacteria: Synechocystis aquatilis Sauvageau and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae Ralfs ex Bornet and Flahault.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
The LMWOCs of macrophytes N. lutea, C. demersum, M. spicatum, Potamogeton obtusifolius Mert. et Koch, Potamogeton perfoliatus L., Potamogeton natans L., and E. canadensis were investigated in the plant material that was collected in the summer seasons of 2015-2017 in the following habitats: (i) oligotrophic Lake Suuri (Karelian Isthmus, Leningrad Oblast, N 61° 07.859', E 29° 55.076') with still waters and sticky silt bottom, (ii) an area in the estuary of the Volkhov River (Volkhov Bay, Lake Ladoga, N 60° 07.139', E 32° 19.566') with fast waters and silty sand bottom, (iii) ponds of the Victory Park (St. Petersburg, N 60° 52.025', E 30° 19.91') with small depths and silt bottom, (iv) different habitats in mesotrophic Lake Ladoga (N 60° 50', E 31° 33'), and (v) mesotrophic Lake Naroch (N 54° 51', E 26° 45'). Plant samples were
washed to remove debris and air-dried in a closed and darkened room without direct sunlight.
Isolation of oils
Before distillation, the dried plant material was ground to a powder in a Waring BB 25ES blender (Waring, United States). The fraction of organic compounds was obtained from the dry aquatic plant material using the same Clevenger-type apparatus method, commonly used to extract essential oils from terrestrial plants (Clevenger, 1928; Anderson et al., 1993). Hydrodistillation was performed for 8 hours. Then the oils were extracted with hexane (5 mL). The extracts were stored in a freezing chamber (-18 °C) prior to GC-MS analysis.
GC-MS analysis
The concentrations of LMWOCs were determined after hexane extraction using a TRACE ISQ gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation) equipped with a quadrupole mass analyzer and Thermo TG-SQC Column (15 m, inner diameter: 0.25 mm, and 0.25 ^m film). Helium served as a carrier gas, the ionization voltage was 70 eV. The mass spectra were registered in scan mode for the whole mass range (30-580 amu) in a programmed temperature regime: the oven temperature was kept at 35 °C for 3 minutes; then the temperature was increased to 60 °C at a rate of 2 °C/minute and kept constant for 3 minutes; after that, the temperature was increased to 80 °C at a rate of 2 °C/minute and kept constant for 3 minutes, increased to 120 °C at a rate of 4 °C/minute and kept constant for 3 minutes, increased to 150 °C at a rate of 5 °C/minute and kept constant for 3 minutes, increased to 240 °C at a rate of 15 °C/ minute. Finally, it was held isothermal for 10 minutes.
As an example, Fig. 1 presents chromatogram sections of Potamogeton perfoliatus essential oil
Fig. 1. Chromatogram sections of Potamogeton perfoliatus essential oil (Lekhmolahti Bay, Lake Ladoga) with marked peaks of carboxylic acids. a: A - Octanoic acid, B - Nonanoic acid, C - Decanoic acid, D - Dodecanoic acid; b: E - Tetradecanoic acid, F - Pentadecanoic acid, G - 14-Pentadecenoic acid, H - Palmitolinoleic acid, I - Hexadecanoic acid, J - Linolenic acid
(Lekhmolahti Bay, Lake Ladoga) with marked peaks of fatty acids that are of the greatest interest. The LMWOCs determined in the samples of aquatic plants were identified by
matching their mass spectra with those from the NIST_2014 and the Wiley mass spectral libraries. The identification of the compounds was confirmed by Linear Retention Indices
obtained from a series of straight-chain alkanes (C 7-C 30) (Zellner et al., 2008). Quantitative analysis was performed using Merck-certified reference materials decafluorobenzophenone and benzophenone (CAS Numbers 119-61-9 and 853-30-4) as internal standards.
PASS analysis
Prediction of Activity Spectra forSub stances was carried out with the PASS 2014 Refined version to get biological activity spectra of each compound. PASS 2014 Refined is software for predicting biological activity spectra for organic compounds based on their structural formulas (Filimonov et al., 2014). As input information, PASS uses the information on the structural formula of the molecule represented as a Molfile for a single structure or as an SDfile for a set of structures (Accelrys Inc., http://accelrys. com). PASS output is a list of probable activities with two estimates: Pa - the probability of being active and Pi - the probability of being inactive. Prediction of PASS is based on SAR analysis of the training set containing about one million compounds showing more than 7000 biological activities. Being probabilities, the Pa and Pi values vary from 0.000 to 1.000, however Pa+Pj^1, since these probabilities are calculated independently.
Assaying allelochemicals
The experiments were carried out in microcosms with a volume of 0.5 liters. Cyanobacterial cultures of S. aquatilis andA.flos-aquae were introduced as suspensions. We used in experiments an axenic strain of Synechocystis aquatilis Sauvageau No. 1336 from the collection of the living cultures of cyanobacteria, algae, and algal parasites (CALU, Collection of Algae of Leningrad University), which was provided by the Centre for Culture Collection of Microorganisms of the Research Park at St. Petersburg University.
The strain was isolated from a sample of water taken in the Gulf of Finland near Sosnovy Bor. Another axenic strain of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae was provided by the St. Petersburg Scientific Research Center for Ecological Safety of the Russian Academy of Sciences from the culture that is maintained in that Center.
Cyanobacteria were cultured on medium No. 6 of the following composition: KNO3-1 g / L; KHPO4-O.2 g / L; MgSO4 x 7H2O - 0.2 g / L; CaCl2-0.15 g / L; NaHCO3 0.2 g / L; trace element solution 1 ml / L. The trace element solution for medium No. 6: ZnSO4 x 7H2O - 0.22 g / L; MnSO4-1.81 g / L; &1SO4 x 5H2O - 0.079 g / L; NaBO3 x 4H2O - 2.63 g / L; (NH4) 6Mo7O24 x 4H2O - 1 g / L; FeSO4 x 7H2O - 9.3 g / L; CaCl2-1.2 g / L; Co(NO3)2 x 4H2O - 0.02 g / L; Na2EDTA (Trilon B) - 10 g / L (Gromov et al., 1991).
Cultivation of cyanobacteria was carried out in a special aquarium using a liquid circulation cryothermostat with cooling and heating (Baths WCR Circulation water bath WCR-MaXircu CR-P8 (Daihan (Witeg)). The unit maintained a constant temperature of 25 °C during the experiments. The lamp (Lamp Biodesign RIF 80 / 110 / PANORAMA 80/100 / DIARAMA 150/200) provided a luminous flux of 1500 lm. The day-night mode was set using an adjustable timer (FERON TM50, 3500W / 16A230V).
Instead of natural LMWOCs, the purified analogous substances (heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, tetradecanoic acid, and gallic acid) from Acros Organics BVBA and their combination were used in experiments to test their algaecidal effects on S. aquatilis and A. flos-aquae.
The compounds were added to the algal cultures to achieve their final concentrations of 0.001 mg / L, 0.01 mg / L, 0.1 mg / L, 1 mg / L, and 10 mg / L.
The growth of cyanobacterial cultures was monitored using a light microscope (ZEISS Axio Lab.A1) and a luminescent microscope (LOMO
MIKMED-2) at 2-7-day intervals in different experiments.
Results and discussion
In total, 75 major LMWOCs from macrophytes from various water bodies indicated above were identified using the GS-MS method. In order to predict the biological activity profiles, their structural formulas were presented as an SDF-file and then used in the virtual screening based on a commercially available software product, PASS 2014 Refined.
The PASS software product, which predicts biological effects and biochemical mechanisms based on the structural formula of a substance in less than a second with more than 80 % accuracy, can be efficiently used to obtain the predicted biological activity profile for compounds and to find new mechanisms. We previously reported high probabilities of anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antifungal activities for some of these compounds (Kurashov et al., 2016).
Despite a large number ofbiological activities (several thousand) inherent in all identified LMWOCs according to PASS predictions, in this study, only those types of activities were taken into account that could potentially have an inhibitory effect on cyanobacteria.
Although many substances have an inhibitory effect on cyanobacteria, only a few inhibitory mechanisms have been elucidated. A general mechanism for inhibiting cyanobacteria due to the oxidative damage by polyphenol-autoxidized products has been described (Nakai et al., 2001). Other studies suggest that alkaline phosphatase inhibition (Gross et al., 1996; Dziga et al., 2007) and interruption of electron transfer chains of photosystem II (PS II) (Leu et al., 2002; Dziga et al., 2007) can also be inhibitory mechanisms. Superoxide dismutase inactivation and subsequent oxidative damage to algal cells can also be a significant cause of inhibiting the
growth of cyanobacteria (Hong et al., 2008a, 2008b; Wu et al., 2019).
However, all explanations are based only on speculation prompted by the chemical characteristics of substances. Direct evidence is missing, and how the substances act against cyanobacteria is now unknown. Thus, further study is needed to explain the inhibitory mechanism. For this purpose, using the literature data, we employ PASS to extract information on specific activities and/or groups of activities of the allelochemicals associated with the biofunctions of cyanobacteria. This is exemplified in Table 1. This table seems to contain the main biological activities of the allelochemicals that we could identify from the PASS analysis and which were supported by experimental evidence found in the literature. However, there may be other mechanisms that we have not considered. Based on the information presented in Table 1, we regard as the most important those specific activities or groups of activities that lead both to inhibition and impairment of the processes of cell membrane formation in cyanobacteria.
The probability Pa reflects, above all, the similarity of the molecular structure of the substance to the molecular structures of the most typical «active» compounds in the corresponding subset in the training set. Therefore, as a rule, there are no direct correlation values Pa with quantitative characteristics of the activity.
The PASS prediction results are usually interpreted and used in a flexible manner: (i) only activities with Pa>Pt are considered possible for a particular compound; (ii) if Pa>0.7, the chance to find the activity experimentally is high; (iii) if 0.5<Pa<0.7, the chance to find the activity experimentally is lower, but the compound is probably not so similar to known biological agents, and (iv) if Pa<0.5, the chance to find the activity experimentally is even lower, but if it
Table 1. Selected biological activities and/or groups of activities and reasons for selecting
1 Peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase inhibitor Peptidoglycan is an important component of the membrane of bacterial cells, protecting cells from rupture due to turgor and maintaining the shape of the cells. Peptidoglycan is also found in glaucocys-tophytic algae, as part of the cell walls of cyanells, which are evolutionarily derived from ancient bacteria (Loffelhardt, Bohnert, 1994). Glycosyltransfer-ases are the most attractive target for bacterial inhibition (Mesleh et al., 2016).
2 Groups of activities: UDP-N-acetylglucos-amine 4-epimerase inhibitor; N 4-(beta-N-acetylglucosaminyl)-L-asparaginase inhibitor; Acetylgalactosaminyl-O-glycosyl-glycoprotein beta-1,3 -N-acetylg lucosaminyltransferase inhibitor; Steroid N-acetylglucosaminyltransfer-ase inhibitor; N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase inhibitor; Alpha-N-acetylglucosaminidase inhibitor. Responsible for the formation of the cell membrane in cyanobacteria, since the supporting skeleton of the bacterial cell wall consists largely of a peptido-glycan polymer (murein). This macromolecule is a heteropolymer built from chains in which the residues of N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid (N-acetylglucosamine lactate) alternate, and which are interconnected by P-1,4-glycosidic bonds (Schlegel, 1986)
3 Groups of activities: Carboxypeptidase Taq inhibitor; Carboxypeptidase D inhibitor; Gly-X carboxypeptidase inhibitor; Muramoyltetrapeptide carboxypeptidase inhibitor; Metallocarboxypeptidase D inhibitor. Responsible for inhibiting the growth of the cyano-bacterial culture. The presence of activities of the 3rd group indicates the general carboxypeptidase inhibitory activity of the test compound. Thus, a high carboxypeptidase inhibitory activity will help suppress the growth of the cyanobacterial culture.
4 Groups of activities: IgA-specific metalloendopep-tidase inhibitor; IgA-specific serine endopeptidase inhibitor; Endopeptidase So inhibitor; Procollagen N-endopeptidase inhibitor; Glutamyl endopeptidase II inhibitor. Responsible for impairment of the cell membrane formation. It has been shown (Loffelhardt, Bohnert, 1994) that peptidoglycan is sandwiched between the outer and inner membranes in the periplasmic space and that the enzymes are on the outer surface of the inner membrane.
5 Groups of activities: Peptidoglycan beta-N-acetylmuramidase inhibitor; UDP-N-acetylmuramate-L-alanine ligase inhibitor; UDP-N-acetylmuramoylalanine-D-glutamate ligase inhibitor Responsible for impairment of the cell membrane formation since the biosynthesis of the soluble precursor of UDP-N-acetylmuramyl pentapeptide in the cyanella stroma follows a path similar to that of E. coli (Loffelhardt Bohnert, 1994).
6 Groups of activities: Glutamyl endopeptidase II inhibitor; Gamma-D-Glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelate peptidase inhibitor; Pyroglutamyl-peptidase I inhibitor; N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase inhibitor; Gamma-glutamyltransferase inhibitor; Protein-glutamate methylesterase inhibitor. These activities lead to the inhibition of some green algae (Luque et al., 2006), and it can be expected that they will inhibit the development of cyanobacteria as well.
7 Groups of activities: L-glutamate oxidase inhibitor; D-glutamate oxidase inhibitor; UDP-N-acetylglu-cosamine 4-epimerase inhibitor; L-3-cyanoalanine synthase inhibitor; D-alanine 2-hydroxymethyl-transferase inhibitor; Gamma-D-Glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelate peptidase inhibitor; Diami-nopimelate dehydrogenase inhibitor. Responsible for the degradation of cyanobacteria. All peptidoglycan components were found in cy-anells, which explains the lethal effect of antibiotics on these autotrophic organisms (Berenguer et al., 1987).
8 Groups of activities: Cyanoalanine nitrilase inhibitor; 3-Cyanoalanine hydratase inhibitor. Nitrilases are an important component of the enzyme system of cyanobacteria (Heinemann et al., 2003). In this regard, this can be considered as an important mechanism for limiting the growth of cyanobacteria.
Continuation of the Table. 1
9 Groups of activities: Glycogen (starch) synthase inhibitor; 1,4-Alpha-glucan branching enzyme inhibitor; Phosphorylase inhibitor. Responsible for suppressing cyanobacterial blooms. Cyanobacteria, as well as most phototrophic microorganisms, use carbon storage mechanisms. The main C-storage of cyanobacteria is glycogen. Synthesis involves four enzymes (Kromkamp, 1987).
10 Groups of activities: 2-Oxoglutarate decarboxylase inhibitor; Oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (lipoamide) inhibitor; 4-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2-oxoglutarate al-dolase inhibitor; 4-Hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolase inhibitor. In cyanobacteria, the main function of the oxidative branch of the TCA cycle (Krebs cycle) is the synthesis of 2-oxoglutarate, which serves as a C-skeleton for the assimilation of ammonia through the GS-GOGAT cycle (glutamate synthesis) (Zhang et al., 2006). Like the previous one, this group of bioactivi-ties will lead to the suppression of the development of cyanobacteria through the inhibition of these processes.
11 Groups of activities: Ferredoxin-NAD+ reductase inhibitor; Aldehyde ferredoxin oxidoreductase inhibitor; Glutamate synthase (ferredoxin) inhibitor; Ferredoxin hydrogenase inhibitor; Ferredoxin-nitrite reductase inhibitor; Ferredoxin-NADP+ re-ductase inhibitor. Most studies of ferredoxins were carried out with the model strain of cyanobacteria Synechocystis PCC 6803 (Cassier-Chauvat, Chauvat, 2014), which has nine highly conserved ferredoxins. Inhibition of the corresponding functions of the 11th group will lead to inhibition of the development of cyanobac-teria.
12 Glucan endo-1,3-beta-D-glucosidase inhibitor. Leads to disruptions in the glycogen cycle in cyanobacteria (Konishi et al., 1995; Attwater, 2010).
13 Groups of activities: Xylan endo-1,3-beta-xylosidase inhibitor; Xylan 1,4-beta-xylosidase inhibitor. It was shown in (Attwater, 2010) that the cyanobacteria Nodularia spumigena and Microcystis aeruginosa produce xylosidase. These activities will inhibit the synthesis of xylosidase in cyanobacteria.
14 Groups of activities: Leucine transaminase inhibitor; Leucine dehydrogenase inhibitor. Leucine in cyanobacteria, in particular in the genera Microcystis, Nostoc, Phormidium, Nodularia, takes part in the biosynthesis of microcystins (Attwater, 2010). In this regard, inhibition of the processes associated with the synthesis of leucine will lead to inhibition of the development of cyanobacteria.
15 Antibacterial Considered as general antibacterial activity.
is confirmed, the compound might be a new chemical-biological entity.
Thirty major LMWOCs that, according to preliminary data (Macias et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010; Nakai et al., 2012; Kurashov et al., 2014, 2021; Zhu et al., 2021), may be promising algaecidal allelopathic agents against cyanobacteria were selected for the study of biological activities using PASS (Table 2).
In the present study, we applied a stronger criterion, Pa > 70 %, to increase the chance of experimental confirmation of the predicted activities. As a result, among 30 LMWOCs, 26
were selected that met the above criterion. The complete list of these compounds with activities and their probabilities is given in Table 3.
Analysis of the results showed that among the selected compounds, 18 contain carboxyl groups and correspond to the highest Pa values. The predicted results are in good agreement with literature data. For instance, it was reported (Jandl et al., 2002; Nakai et al., 2005; Zhai et al., 2022) that saturated and unsaturated carboxylic acids can be active allelochemicals. Moreover, it was shown (Nakai et al., 2000; Lourengao et al., 2021) that gallic acid actively inhibits the
Table 2. Pa values of biological activities predicted by PASS for 30 major LMWOCs of aquatic macrophytes
LMWOCs Groups of activities as in Table 1
1/2 3/4 5/6 7/8 9/10 11/12 13/14 15
Gallic acid 0.568/0.543-0.926 0.579-0.779/ 0.475-0.926 0.117-0.169/ 0.679-0.926 0.450-0.926/ 0.723-0.753 0.340-0.458/ 0.445-0.840 0.609-0.878/0.878 0.531-0.862/ 0.522-0.737 0.420
Nonanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/ 0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
Octadecanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
cis-6-Octadecenoic acid 0.743/ 0.440-0.737 0.464-0.933/ 0.788-0.811 0.175/0.533-0.788 0.647-0.737/ 0.533 0.348-0.508/ 0.527-0.764 0.515-0.617/0.909 0.474-0.899/ 0.475-0.638 0.332
cis-9-Octadecenoic acid 0.743/ 0.440-0.737 0.464-0.933/ 0.788-0.811 0.175/0.533-0.788 0.647-0.737/ 0.533 0.348-0.508/ 0.527-0.764 0.515-0.617/0.909 0.474-0.899/ 0.475-0.638 0.332
6,10,14 -Trimethy lpen-tadecan-2-one 0.498/0.306-0.579 0.322-0.726/ 0.613-0.656 0-0.103/ 0.503-0.767 0.496-0.579/ 0.357-0.372 0.250-0.275/ 0.236-0.588 0.281-0.428/0.568 0.118-0.538/ 0.213-0.739 0.297
14-Pentadecenoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
Linolenic acid 0.720/ 0.405-0.706 0.419-0.905/ 0.718-0.739 0.151-0.165/ 0.404-0.763 0.611-0.706/ 0.502-0.506 0.285-0.480/ 0.466-0.730 0.474-0.573/0.858 0.384-0.856/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
3,7,11,15-Tetrame-thyl-hexadec-2-en-l-yl acetate 0.406/0.187-0.397 0.263-0.637/ 0.286-0.385 0-0.074/ 0.437-0.455 0.220-0.397/ 0.266-0.292 0.192-0.205/ 0.069-0.136 0.162-0.200/0.447 0.071-0.351/ 0.146-0.327 0.418
Dodecanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
Tetradecanal 0.552/0.651-0.721 0.453-0.891/ 0.755-0.878 0-0.215/ 0.577-0.794 0.654-0.721/ 0.453-0.454 0.420-0.525/ 0.177-0.803 0.612-0.801/0.738 0.553-0.837/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
5,8,11-Heptadecatrien-l-ol 0.599/0.511-0.686 0.235-0.921/ 0.660-0.864 0.113-0.181/ 0.618-0.717 0.532-0.686/ 0.432-0.443 0.391-0.399/ 0.222-0.314 0.404-0.484/0.775 0.515-0.872/ 0.306-0.322 0.317
Hexadeca-7,10,13 -trienal 0.439/0.496-0.589 0.327-0.779/ 0.591-0.735 0-0.150/ 0.263-0.691 0.503-0.589/ 0.352-0.365 0.300-0.386/ 0.100-0.673 0.449-0.745/0.573 0.370-0.607/ 0.262-0.309 0.410
Benzene, l-ethenyl-4-methoxy- 0.441/0.255-0.599 0.195-0.494/ 0.342-0.371 0-0.063/ 0.269-0.679 0.523-0.599/ 0.467-0.472 0.113-0.180/ 0.076-0.189 0.202-0.444/0.432 0.078-0.280/ 0.145-0.226 0.289
Octanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
Decanal 0.552/0.651-0.721 0.453-0.891/ 0.755-0.878 0-0.215/ 0.577-0.794 0.654-0.721/ 0.453-0.454 0.420-0.525/ 0.177-0.803 0.612-0.801/0.738 0.553-0.837/ 0.308-0.416 0.377
Decanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
Pentadecanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
Benzaldehyde 0.540/0.575-0.824 0.423-0.796/ 0.700-0.780 0-0.130/ 0.385-0.867 0.798-0.824/ 0.586-0.621 0.282-0.355/ 0.170-0.569 0.598-0.778/0.628 0.334-0.680/ 0.364-0.663 0.334
Hexenal 0.490/0.570-0.663 0.386-0.827/ 0.659-0.799 0-0.173/ 0.404-0.747 0.586-0.663/ 0.407 0.353-0.440/ 0.134-0.597 0.543-0.855/0.631 0.447-0.708/ 0.266-0.358 0.331
Benzoic acid, phenylmethyl ester 0.509/0.645-0.896 0.292-0.742/ 0.580-0.722 0.096-0.120/ 0.420-0.870 0.803-0.896/ 0.633-0.662 0.327-0.335/ 0.211-0.496 0.503-0.784/0.710 0.383-0.740/ 0.375-0.478 0.262
Heptanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
Tridecanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
Anticopalic acid 0.495/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0.357 0/0 0.442
l-Butyl-3-(2-chloro-4,6-dimethy 1-py ridin-3 -y l)-urea 0/0 0/0.307-0.714 0/0-0.352 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0
Palmitoleic acid 0.743/ 0.440-0.737 0.464-0.933/ 0.802-0.811 0.175/0.533-0.788 0.647-0.737/ 0-0.533 0.348-0.508/ 0.527-0.764 0.515-0.617/0.909 0.474-0.899/ 0.475-0.638 0.332
Tetradecanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
9-cis,12-cis-Linoleic acid 0.720/ 0.405-0.706 0.419-0.925/ 0.781-0.783 0.162-0.165/ 0.490-0.763 0.611-0.737/ 0.502-0.506 0.321-0.480/ 0.466-0.730 0.474-0.573/0.892 0.442-0.886/ 0.442-0.605 0.335
Hexadecanoic acid 0.814/0.561-0.810 0.623-0.954/ 0.854-0.914 0.203-0.216/ 0.697-0.875 0.685-0.810/ 0.605-0.614 0.410-0.620/ 0.745-0.845 0.547-0.714/0.945 0.563-0.935/ 0.589-0.665 0.300
Phytol 0.512/0.360-0.535 0.319-0.750/ 0.377-0.464 0-0.107/ 0.365-0.598 0.359-0.535/ 0.328-0.347 0.280-0.296/ 0.102-0.237 0.237-0.327/0.529 0.166-0.514/ 0.204-0.416 0.417
Table 3. The number of manifestations of various biological activities (out of 15 groups analyzed) for major LMWOCs of aquatic macrophytes, predicted by PASS
LMWOCs 0.7<Ра< 0.8 0.8<Ра< 0.9 Ра > 0.9
14-Pentadecenoic acid 1 5 4
Saturated carboxylic acids* 1 5 4
Gallic acid 3 4 4
cis-6-Octadecenoic acid 5 1 3
cis-9-Octadecenoic acid 5 1 3
Palmitoleic acid 5 1 3
Linolenic acid 6 2 1
9-cis,12-cis-Linoleic acid 5 2 1
5,8,11-Heptadecatrien-l-ol 2 2 1
Decanal 4 5 0
Tetradecanal 4 5 0
Benzoic acid, phenylmethyl ester 5 3 0
Benzaldehyde 3 3 0
Hexenal 2 3 0
6,10,14 -Trimethylpentadecan-2-one 3 0 0
cis, cis, cis-7,10,13-Hexadecatrienal 3 0 0
1 -Butyl-3 - (2-chloro-4,6-dimethyl-pyridin-3-yl)-urea 1 0 0
Note: * - Heptanoic acid, Octanoic acid, Nonanoic acid, Decanoic acid, Dodecanoic acid, Tridecanoic acid, Tetradecanoic acid, Pentadecanoic acid, Hexadecanoic acid, Octadecanoic acid
growth of cyanobacterium M. aeruginosa. Thus, the study of biological activities in PASS showed that the most promising compounds for further experimental verification are carboxylic acids (saturated and unsaturated) and gallic acid, as substances potentially possessing the largest number of biological activities contributing to the inhibition of development of cyanobacteria (Table 3). The mass spectral patterns of some carboxylic acids are given as an example in the chromatogram sections of P. perfoliatus essential oil (Fig. 1).
Four acids were selected for further experimental verification - heptanoic, octanoic, tetradecanoic, and gallic acids - against tested species of cyanobacteria: S. aquatilis and A. flos-aquae. We did not consider unsaturated carboxylic acids in this study, since they have a
rather high market value (https://www.made-in-china.com/). This circumstance, apparently, will limit their use as algaecides.
To test the effects of selected compounds at several concentrations in different cyanobacterial cultures, we applied a classical method performed in microcosms and based on direct cell counts. The experimental results are presented in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. Our results confirmed that heptanoic, octanoic, tetradecanoic, and gallic acids significantly inhibited the growth of both cyanobacterial species (1.9-7190 times compared to the control) (Fig. 2, 3), especially A. flos-aquae (Fig. 3b). Application of even 0.1 mg/L of the combined mixture showed a significant decrease compared to the control (Fig. 3b). It is important that this cyanobacterium is one of the usual species that cause harmful cyanobacterial
12000 E 10000 1 8000 ^ 6000 | 4000
I 2000 0
—1— -1— ——I— ——T"
1 3 6 9 12 16
experiment days
■ Control
p1 mg/l
12000
I 10000
i 8000 <U
i 6000
= 4000
£ 2000 z
0
^ ^
3 6 9
experiment days
12
«Control
□ 1 mg/l
16
12000 -
E 10000 -
—,
8000 -
ti
■o 6000 -
c
4000 -
o
■C 2000 -
z 0 ■
25000
I 20000 *
1 15000 | 10000 ! 5000
z 0
experiment days
2 6
experiment days
«Control
□ 1 mg/l
■ Control BO 001 mg/l bQ01 mg^ aO.1 mg/l
Fig. 2. The average number (median) of the culture of S. aquatilis in the experiment with heptanoic acid (a), octanoic acid (b), gallic acid (c), and tetradecanoic acid (d)
70000 60000 '50000
" 40000 ■o c ra
3 30000
Z" 20000 10000 0
160000
140000
E 120000
o u 100000
-u
c (0 80000
V>
JZ 60000
■M
z"
40000
20000
u
E
1 5 8 10
□ Control H 0.1 mg/l 01 mg/l □ 10 mg/l
3 7 13
I Control 0 0.1 mg/l 0 1 mg/l □ 10 mg/l
m
13
b
---- -- ■RKHETa- 1 mSrTT,
20
Fig. 3. The average number (median) of the culture of S. aquatilis (a) and A. flos-aquae (b) in an experiment with the combined effect of heptanoic, octanoic, tetradecanoic, and gallic acids at various concentrations. On the abscissa - the days of the experiment
"blooms" (HCBs) in water bodies (Svircev et al., 2019; Zerrifi et al., 2021). It forms the most common and noxious type of HCB in freshwater environments, which has potentially serious consequences for environmental and human health.
Because gallic acid, a phenolic compound, and straight-chain saturated fatty acids differ in their chemical properties, their combination may result in different growth inhibition modes. It is reasonable to expect that their common cyanobacterial growth inhibition activities may be additive or synergistic. The inhibitions of
cyanobacteria by some substances are known to be synergistic. For example, four polyphenols (pyrogallic acid, gallic acid, ellagic acid, and (f>)-catechin) were identified as allelochemicals antagonistic toward cyanobacteria (Nakai et al., 2000; Zhai et al., 2022). Also, Zhu et al. (2010) studied the combined inhibitory effects of these polyphenols against M. aeruginosa and found apparent synergistic effects.
Conclusions
The present study showed that a combined approach can be used to search for effective
allelochemicals against cyanobacteria, including, in the first stage, the SAR methodology followed by experimental verification of the most promising compounds. Our results demonstrated that representatives of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids and gallic acid (possibly other phenolic acids as well) with high activity against cyanobacteria should become components of various combinations for new-generation algaecides to control HCBs.
All compounds tested in this study were toxic for species of cyanobacteria in a dose-dependent manner. Since the inhibitory effect of
References
the combined mixture of these allelochemicals was stronger than the effects of the individual components, it is reasonable to assume that there are various mechanisms of cyanobacterial growth inhibition.
Further research is necessary to investigate the relationship between structural molecular factors and the anti-cyanobacterial activity of different metabolites of freshwater macrophytes. It can also be assumed that various combinations of allelochemicals can be designed to suppress populations of various species of cyanobacteria to achieve the most effective suppression.
Allelopathy. Current trends andfuture applications (2013) Cheema Z., Farooq M., Wahid A. (eds.) Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 528 p.
Amorim C. A., de Moura-Falcao R. H., Valenga C. R., de Souza V. R., Moura A. N. (2019) Allelopathic effects of the aquatic macrophyte Ceratophyllum demersum L. on phytoplankton species: contrasting effects between cyanobacteria and chlorophytes. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 31: e21
Anderson T. A., Guthrie E. A., Walton B. T. (1993) Bioremediation in the rhizosphere.
Environmental Science & Technology, 27(13): 2630-2636
Asif A., Baig M. A., Siddiqui M. B. (2021) Role of jasmonates and salicylates in plant allelopathy.
Jasmonates and salicylates signaling in plants. Signaling and communication in plants. Aftab T., Yusuf M. (eds.) Springer, Cham, p. 115-127
Attwater L. J. (2010) Extracellular enzymes of cyanobacteria Nodularia spumigena, Microcystis aeruginosa and green alga Mychonastes homosphaera. MSc Thesis. University of Western Sydney, 123 p.
Balaji-Prasath B., Wang Y., Su Y. P., Hamilton D. P., Lin H., Zheng L., Zhang Y. (2022) Methods to control harmful algal blooms: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20(5): 3133-3152
Berenguer J., Rojo F., de Pedro M. A., Pfanzagl B., Loffelhardt W. (1987) Penicillin-binding proteins in the cyanelles of Cyanophora paradoxa, a eukaryotic photoautotroph sensitive to P-lactam antibiotics. FEBSLetters, 224(2): 401-405
Cassier-Chauvat С., Chauvat F. (2014) Function and regulation of ferredoxins in the cyanobacterium, Synechocystis PCC 6803: recent advances. Life (Basel), 4(4): 666-680
Clevenger J. F. (1928) Apparatus for the determination of volatile oil. The Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1912), 17(4): 345-349
Co-evolution of secondary metabolites (2020) Merillon J.-M., Ramawat K. G. (eds.) Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 973 p.
Cyanobacteria: ecology, toxicology and management (2013) Ferrao-Filho A. S. (ed.) Nova Science Pub Inc., New York, 225 p.
Dziga D., Suda M., Bialczyk J., Czaja-Prokop U., Lechowski Z. (2007) The alteration of Microcystis aeruginosa biomass and dissolved microcystin-LR concentration following exposure to plant-producing phenols. Environmental Toxicology, 22(4): 341-346
Fattahian M., Ghanadian M., Ali Z., Khan I. A. (2020) Jatrophane and rearranged jatrophane-type diterpenes: biogenesis, structure, isolation, biological activity and SARs (1984-2019). Phytochemistry Reviews, 19(2): 265-336
Filimonov D. A., Druzhilovskiy D. S., Lagunin A. A., Gloriozova T. A., Rudik A. V., Dmitriev A. V., Pogodin P. V., Poroikov V. V. (2018) Computer-aided prediction of biological activity spectra for chemical compounds: opportunities and limitations. Biomedical Chemistry: Research and Methods, 1(1): e00004 Filimonov D. A., Lagunin A. A., Gloriozova T. A., Rudik A. V., Druzhilovskii D. S., Pogodin P. V., Poroikov V. V. (2014) Prediction of the biological activity spectra of organic compounds using the PASS online web resource. Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, 50(3): 444-457
Fink P. (2007) Ecological functions of volatile organic compounds in aquatic systems. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology, 40(3): 155-168
Gillbro J. M., Lundahl M., Westman M., Baral R., Al-Bader T., Mavon A. (2015) Structural activity relationship analysis (SAR) and in vitro testing reveal the anti-ageing potential activity of acetyl aspartic acid. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 37(S 1): 15-20
Gromov B. V., Vepritskiy A. A., Titova N. N., Mamkayeva K. A., Alexandrova O. V. (1991) Production of the antibiotic cyanobacterin LU-1 by Nostoc linckia CALU 892 (cyanobacterium). Journal of AppliedPhycology, 3(1): 55-59
Gross E. M., Meyer H., Schilling G. (1996) Release and ecological impact of algicidal hydrolysable polyphenols in Myriophyllum spicatum. Phytochemistry, 41(1): 133-138
Gurevich F. A. (1978) Role of phytoncides in inland reservoirs. Water Resources [Vodnye Resursy], 2: 133-142 (in Russian)
Heinemann U., Engels D., Burger S., Kiziak C., Mattes R., Stolz A. (2003) Cloning of a nitrilase gene from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 and heterologous expression and characterization of the encoded protein. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(8): 4359-4366 Hilt S., Gross E. M. (2008) Can allelopathically active submerged macrophytes stabilize clear-water states in shallow lakes? Basic and Applied Ecology, 9(4): 422-432
Hong Y., Hu H. Y., Xie X., Li F. M. (2008a) Responses of enzymatic antioxidants and non-enzymatic antioxidants in the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa to the allelochemical ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) isolated from reed (Phragmites communis). Journal of Plant Physiology, 165(12): 1264-1273
Hong Y., Hu H. Y., Li F. M. (2008b) Physiological and biochemical effects of allelochemical ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) on cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 71(2): 527-534
Hu H., Hong Y. (2008) Algal-bloom control by allelopathy of aquatic macrophytes - a review. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2(4): 421-438
Jandl G., Schulten H.-R., Leinweber P. (2002) Quantification of long-chain fatty acids in dissolved organic matter and soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 165(2): 133-139
Kelman D., Posner E. K., McDermid K. J., Tabandera N. K., Wright P. R., Wright A. D. (2012) Antioxidant activity of Hawaiian marine algae. Marine Drugs, 10(2): 403-416
Khameneh B., Iranshahy M., Soheili V., Fazly Bazzaz B. S. (2019) Review on plant antimicrobials: a mechanistic viewpoint. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 8: 118
Koksharova O. A. (2020) Cyanobacterial VOCs as allelopathic tools. Bacterial volatile compounds as mediators of airborne interactions. Ryu C. M., Weisskopf L., Piechulla B. (eds.) Springer, Singapore, p. 257-280
Konishi Y., Takahashi N., Muthuvelan B., Fujimori K. (1995) Glycogen as primordial carbon reserve and a-glucosidase in the genera Lynghya-Phormidium-Plectonema, thermophilic cyanobacteria. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 59(3): 546-548
Kromkamp J. (1987) Formation and functional significance of storage products in cyanobacteria. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 21(3): 457-465
Kurashov E. A., Mitrukova G. G., Krylova J. V. (2018) Interannual variability of low-molecular metabolite composition in Ceratophyllum demersum (Ceratophyllaceae) from a floodplain lake with a changeable trophic status. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 11(2): 179-194
Kurashov E., Krylova J., Protopopova E. (2021) The use of allelochemicals of aquatic macrophytes to suppress the development of cyanobacterial "blooms". Plankton communities. Pereira L., Gongalves A. M. M. (eds.) IntechOpen, London
Kurashov E. A., Fedorova E. V., Krylova J. V., Mitrukova G. G. (2016) Assessment of the potential biological activity of low molecular weight metabolites of freshwater macrophytes with QSAR. Scientifica, 2016: 1205680
Kurashov E. A., Krylova J. V., Mitrukova G. G., Chernova A. M. (2014) Low-molecular-weight metabolites of aquatic macrophytes growing on the territory of Russia and their role in hydroecosystems. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 7(4): 433-448
Lagunin A. A., Druzhilovsky D. S., Rudik A. V., Filimonov D. A., Gawande D., Suresh K., Goel R., Poroikov V. V. (2016) Capacities of computer evaluation of hidden potential of phytochemicals of medicinal plants of the traditional Indian Ayurvedic medicine. Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement Series B: Biomedical Chemistry, 10(1): 43-54
Leu E., Krieger-Liszkay A., Goussias C., Gross E. M. (2002) Polyphenolic allelochemicals from the aquatic angiosperm Myriophyllum spicatum inhibit photosystem II. Plant Physiology, 130(4): 2011-2018
Li Y., Xu L., Letuma P., Lin W. (2020) Metabolite profiling of rhizosphere soil of different allelopathic potential rice accessions. BMC Plant Biology, 20: 265
Li Z.-H., Wang Q., Ruan X., Pan C.-D., Jiang D.-A. (2010) Phenolics and plant allelopathy. Molecules, 15(12): 8933-8952
Loffelhardt W., Bohnert H. J. (1994) Molecular biology of cyanelles. Advances in photosynthesis. Vol. 1. The molecular biology of cyanobacteria. Bryant D. A. (ed.) Springer, Dordrecht, p. 65-89
Lourengao A., Mecina G. F., Cordeiro-Arahjo M. K., Bittencourt-Oliveira M. C., Chia M. A., Bronzel-Jhnior J. L., Granero F. O., Silva L. P., da Silva R. M. G. (2021) Characterization of allelochemicals from Pistia stratiotes extracts and their effects on the growth and physiology of Microcystis aeruginosa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(40): 57248-57259
Luque I., Andhjar A., Jia L., Zabulon G., de Marsac N. T., Flores E., Houmard J. (2006) Regulated expression of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase is directed by a mobile genetic element in the cyanobacterium Tolypothrix sp. PCC 7601. Molecular Microbiology, 60(5): 1276-1288
Macías F. A., Galindo J. L. G., García-Díaz M. D., Galindo J. C. G. (2008) Allelopathic agents from aquatic ecosystems: potential biopesticides models. Phytochemistry Reviews, 7(1): 155-178
Mesleh M. F., Rajaratnam P., Conrad M., Chandrasekaran V., Liu C. M., Pandya B. A., Hwang Y. S., Rye P. T., Muldoon C., Becker B., Zuegg J., Meutermans W., Moy T. I. (2016) Targeting bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan synthesis by inhibition of glycosyltransferase activity. Chemical Biology & Drug Design, 87(2): 190-199
Mushtaq W., Siddiqui M. B., Hakeem K. R. (2020) Allelopathy. Potential for green agriculture. Springerbriefs in agriculture. Springer Cham, 69 p.
Nakai S., Zou G., Okuda T., Nishijima W., Hosomi M., Okada M. (2012) Polyphenols and fatty acids responsible for anti-cyanobacterial allelopathic effects of submerged macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum. Water Science and Technology, 66(5): 993-999
Nakai S., Inoue Y., Hosomi M. (2001) Algal growth inhibition effects and inducement modes by plant-producing phenols. Water Research, 35(7): 1855-1859
Nakai S., Inoue Y., Hosomi M., Murakami A. (2000) Myriophyllum spicatum-released allelopathic polyphenols inhibiting growth of blue-green algae Microcystis aeruginosa. Water Research, 34(11): 3026-3032
Nakai S., Yamada S., Hosomi M. (2005) Anti-cyanobacterial fatty acids released from Myriophyllum spicatum. Hydrobiologia, 543(1): 71-78
Poroikov V. V., Filimonov D. A., Gloriozova T. A., Lagunin A. A., Druzhilovskiy D. S., Rudik A. V., Stolbov L. A., Dmitriev A. V., Tarasova O. A., Ivanov S. M., Pogodin P. V. (2019) Computer-aided prediction of biological activity spectra for organic compounds: the possibilities and limitations. Russian Chemical Bulletin, 68(12): 2143-2154
Schlegel H. G. (1986) General microbiology. Sixth edition. Cambridge, University Press, 587 p. Sliwinska-Wilczewska S., Wisniewska K. A., Budzalek G., Konarzewska Z. (2021) Phenomenon of allelopathy in cyanobacteria. Ecophysiology and biochemistry of cyanobacteria. Rastogi R. P. (ed.) Springer, Singapore, p. 225-254
Svircev Z., Lalic D., Bojadzija Savic G., Tokodi N., Drobac Backovic D., Chen L., Meriluoto J., Codd G. A. (2019) Global geographical and historical overview of cyanotoxin distribution and cyanobacterial poisonings. Archives of Toxicology, 93(9): 2429-2481
Wu X. X., Zhang Z. Y., Jin Y. G. (2019) Physiological mechanism of Eichhornia crassipes in inhibiting the growth of Microcytis aeruginosa. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 66(3): 433-439 Zellner B. D., Bicchi C., Dugo P., Rubiolo P., Dugo G., Mondello L. (2008) Linear retention indices in gas chromatographic analysis: a review. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 23(5): 297-314
Zeng Q., Wei Z., Yi C., He Y., Luo M. (2022) The effect of different coverage of aquatic plants on the phytoplankton and zooplankton community structures: a study based on a shallow macrophytic lake. Aquatic Ecology, 56(4): 1347-1358
Zerrifi S. E. A., Mugani R., Redouane E. M., El Khalloufi F., Campos A., Vasconcelos V., Oudra B. (2021) Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms (HCBs): innovative green bioremediation process based on anti-cyanobacteria bioactive natural products. Archives of Microbiology, 203(1): 31-44
Zhai Q., Song L., Ji X., Yu Y., Ye J., Xu W., Hou M. (2022) Research progress of advanced oxidation technology for the removal of Microcystis aeruginosa: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(27): 40449-40461
Zhang C. C., Laurent S., Sakr S., Peng L., Bedu S. (2006) Heterocyst differentiation and pattern formation in cyanobacteria: a chorus of signals. Molecular Microbiology, 59(2): 367-375
Zhang X., Lu X., Wang L. (2019) Allelopathic effect of Ruppia maritima on Chlorella vulgaris and Microcystis aeruginosa. China Environmental Sciences, 39(4): 1589-1595
Zhou J., Cieraad E., van Bodegom P. M. (2022) Global analysis of trait-trait relationships within and between species. New Phytologist, 233(4): 1643-1656
Zhou L., Chen G., Cui N., Pan Q., Song X., Zou G. (2019) Allelopathic effects on Microcystis aeruginosa and allelochemical identification in the culture solutions of typical artificial floating-bed plants. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 102(1): 115-121
Zhu J., Liu B., Wang J., Gao Y., Wu Z. (2010) Study on the mechanism of allelopathic influence on cyanobacteria and chlorophytes by submerged macrophyte (Myriophyllum spicatum) and its secretion. Aquatic Toxicology, 98(2): 196-203
Zhu X., Dao G., Tao Y., Zhan X., Hu H. (2021) A review on control of harmful algal blooms by plant-derived allelochemicals. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 401: 123403