CC BY
16
БОТАНИКА И ОХРАНА ПРИРОДЫ
UKRAINIAN-CANADIAN RESOURCES' EXPEDITION IN THE CRIMEA IN 2009*
Dr. AXEL DIEDERICHSEN1, Dr. ROMAN V. ROZHKOV2, Dr. VLADISLAV V. KORZHENEVSKY3, Dr. ROMAN L. BOGUSLAVSKY2
1 Plant Gene Resources of Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
2 National Centre of Plant Genetic Resources of Ukraine, Ukrainian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kharkiv, Ukraine
3 Nikitsky Botanical Gardens - National Scientific Centre, Yalta, Crimea, Ukraine
Introduction
The Crimea has attracted the attention of botanists and geographers for a long time, because of the Mediterranean climate on the south shore, which is facilitated by the Crimean Mountains that stretch from the south-west to north-east (Regel 1943). The northern part of Crimea is lowland that has a continental climate comparable to many other parts of Eastern Europe and the Ukrainian mainland. The Crimean Mountains consist of three ranges that run parallel to the south-eastern coastline of Crimea protecting the shore facing the Black Sea from continental cold and allowing for a Mediterranean to nearly subtropical climate on a narrow strip of land along the coast. The tallest mountain range close to the coast is of Jurassic origin and sometimes referred to as the Yayla. It reaches an altitude of 1545 m at peak Roman Kosh and has several other peaks higher than 1200 m. The Yayla drops steeply towards the coast of the Black Sea. Extremely different eco-climatic zones with diverse floral elements typical for the Mediterranean, Near East, European and Caucasian regions can be found in close proximity. Walter (1943) distinguished the following three major landscape types of Crimea: (1) The steppe ranging from semi desert to grassland north of the Crimea mountains and including most of the Kerch peninsula is used as grassland or for agriculture with emphasis on cereal production; (2) the Crimean Mountains with oak forests, beech forests and nearly subalpine meadows resembling temperate to oceanic European landscapes with agricultural use limited to grazing; and (3) the south-eastern coastline with Mediterranean character. Agricultural use dominates the northern parts of Crimea. The grazing of the Crimean mountainous meadows by sheep and cattle has declined during recent years. The southern slopes of the Yayla has some vineyards, while other agricultural or horticultural activities are nowadays not very noticeable and seem restricted to occasional home gardens in this area. The most important industry in the South of Crimea is tourism and a lot of recent development of related infrastructure could be seen. Housing construction is very active and many simple buildings not yet inhabited have been erected on former meadows or other open spaces during recent years, obviously bypassing any regular planning by state authorities. This rapid development puts natural habitats at risk.
Already in 1812 the Nikitsky Botanical Gardens was established in close proximity to the city of Yalta. The flora of Crimea is well documented in the herbarium of the Nikitsky Botanical Gardens as well as in literature. The Crimean botanist E.V. Vul'f (1885-1941) scientifically connected botany to the sphere of plant genetic resources. He worked at the Nikitsky Botanical Gardens and systematically compiled the flora of Crimea published in three volumes between 1927 and 1969. Vul'f scientifically connected botany to the sphere of plant genetic resources. He moved in 1926 upon invitation by N.I. Vavilov from Crimea to Leningrad (now. St. Petersburg) to lead the section on volatile oil plants and since 1931 the section herbarium and geography at the Ail-Union Research Institute of Plant Industry, which is now the Russian national genebank named after N.I. Vavilov (Agayev 1994).
A recent inventory of the Crimean flora by Golubev (1996) lists 2775 species of which 2560 are endemic. Of these, 904 species were classified as being rare, very rare, disappearing or critically threatened, indicating the need for close monitoring. This inventory also provides information about
*Статья публикуется в авторской редакции
biological features and potential economic usages of each species pointing at the richness of endemic species that have potential as forages, for volatile oil extraction and as medicinal plants.
Rationale for Colleting
The motivation for this collection mission was the interest in genetically diverse material of wild relatives of cultivated lentil (Lens culinaris L). Three wild lentil species (Lens ervoides, L. nigricans, and L. orientalis) are endemic to Crimea and they are all categorized as being very rare (Golubev 1996). Due to their close relationship to the cultivated lentil, they are sometimes considered as subspecies of L. culinaris (Cubero 1984). L. ervoides has been reported by pathologists to be a source of resistance to anthracnose disease in Canada (Tullu et al. 2006). Access to this material will contribute to the sustainability of lentil production in Canada and other countries that have problems with this disease. Information from specimen labels of the State Nikitsky Botanical Gardens Herbarium (YALT) and knowledge of experts of the Crimean flora was used to determine locations for finding the wild lentil species in Crimea. Germplasm of other crop wild relatives or wild plants that may have potential for cultivation and utilisation was also collected. Recent collecting missions conducted in Crimea as collaborations among Ukrainian institutions and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) focused on crop wild relatives and potential forage legumes with emphasis on the family Poaceae Barnhart (Bockelman 1999) and the genus Medicago L. (Greene 2008). These missions resulted in 500 accessions deposited in the National Centre for Plant Genetic Resources of Ukraine (NCPGRU) as well as the USDA National Plant Germplasm System, including two accessions of wild lentil species.
Table 1.
Germplasm collected in Crimea (Ukraine) in 2009
Usage group Genus Species Authority Family Conservation status1 No. Accessions
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Crop Coriandrum sativum L. Apiaceae n.a. 1
Cuminum cyminum L. Apiaceae n.a. 1
Sinapis alba L. Brassicaceae n.a. 1
Cicer arietinum L. Fabaceae n.a. 1
Phaseolus vulgaris L. Fabaceae n.a. 1
Hordeum vulgare L. Poaceae n.a. 1
Triticum aestivum L. Poaceae n.a. 1
Crop wild relative -Brassicaceae Brassica incana Ten. Brassicaceae 1 1
Camelina microcarpa Andrz. Brassicaceae 11 1
Crambe koktebelica (Junge) N. Busch Brassicaceae 9 1
Crambe pinnatifida R. Br. Brassicaceae 11 1
Crambe pontica Stev. ex Rupr. Brassicaceae 11 1
Crop wild relative -cereal - barley Hordeum bulbosum L. Poaceae 13
Hordeum murinum L. Poaceae 13 1
Crop wild relative -cereal - oat Avena fatua L. Poaceae 12 1
Avena ludoviciana Durieu Poaceae 13 8
Crop wild relative -cereal - rye Secale sylvestre Host Poaceae 12 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Crop wild relative -cereal - wheat Aegilops biuncialis Vis. Poaceae 14 1
Aegilops cylindrica Host Poaceae 14 2
Aegilops triuncialis L. Poaceae 14 1
Dasypyrum villosum (L.) Borb. Poaceae 13 3
Triticum baeoticum Boiss. Poaceae 3 7
Crop wild relative -flax Linum austriacum L. Linaceae 13 2
Crop wild relative -lentil Lens ervoides (Brign.) Grande Fabaceae 11 2
Lens nigricans (Bieb.) Webb et Berth. Fabaceae 11 3
Lens spec. Mill. Fabaceae n.a. 3
Grass Agropyron dasyanthum Ledeb. Poaceae 11 2
Agropyron desertorum (Fisch, ex Link) Schult. Poaceae 6 1
Agropyron pectinatum (Bieb.) Beauv. Poaceae 14 1
Agropyron spec. Gaertn. Poaceae n.a.
Arenatherum elatius (L.) J. et C. Presl Poaceae 12 1
Bromus secalinus L. Poaceae 9 1
Bromus squarrosus L. Poaceae 14 1
Bromus spec. L. Poaceae n.a.
Cynosurus echinatus L. Poaceae 12 1
Dactylis glomerata L. Poaceae 14
Festuca spec. L. Poaceae n.a. 1
Koeleria cristata (L.) Pers. Poaceae 14 1
Leymus racemosus (Bieb.) Tzvel. Poaceae 13 1
Lolium austriacum L. Poaceae 14 1
Mélica spec. L. Poaceae n.a. 1
Puccinellia distans (Jacq.) Pari. Poaceae 12 1
Stipa spec. L. Poaceae n.a. 1
Taeniatherum asperum (Simonk.) Nevski Poaceae 14 1
Forage legume Astragalus spec. L. Fabaceae n.a.
Coronilla scorpioides (L.) Koch Fabaceae 13 1
Coronilla varia L. Fabaceae 14 1
Lathyrus aphaca L. Fabaceae 14 1
Lathyrus pratensis L. Fabaceae 13 1
Lathyrus spec. L. Fabaceae n.a.
Medicago arabica (L.) Huds. Fabaceae 13 1
Medicago denticulata Willd. Fabaceae 12 1
Medicago lupulina L. Fabaceae 14 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Forage legume Medicago minima (L.) Bartalini Fabaceae 14 1
Medicago orbicularis (L.) Bartalini Fabaceae 14 1
Trifolium pratense L. Fabaceae 14 1
Trifolium spec. L. Fabaceae n.a.
Trigonella monspeliaca L. Fabaceae 14 1
Vicia dalmatica A. Kerner Fabaceae 12
Vicia ervilia (L.) Willd. Fabaceae 1 1
Vicia spec. L. Fabaceae n.a.
Medicinal Echballium elaterium (L.) A. Rich. Cucurbitaceae 11 1
Lepidium perfoliatum L. Brassicaceae 13 1
Nigella damascena L. Ranunculaceae 13 1
Plantago lanceolata L. Plantaginaceae 14 1
Rumex euxinus Klok. Polygonaceae 13
Securigera securidaca (L.) Degen et Doerfl. Fabaceae 13 1
Verbascum spec. L. Scrophulariaceae n.a. 1
Ziziphora tenuior L. Lamiaceae 12 1
Ornamental Allium rotundum L. Alliaceae 14 1
Bellevalvia sarmatica (Pall, ex Georgi) Woronow Hyacinthaceae 6 1
Erodium spec. L'Hér Geraniaceae n.a. 1
Hedysarum tauricum Pall, ex Willd. Fabaceae 13 1
Hedysarum candidum Bieb. Fabaceae 13 1
Iris pumila L. Iridaceae 13 1
Matthiola odoratissima (Bieb.) R. Br. Brassicaceae 9 1
Salvia pratensis L. Lamiaceae 13 1
Tulipa schrenkii Regel Liliaceae 11 1
Tulipa spec. L. Liliaceae n.a. 1
Wild Lepidium crassifolium Waldst. et Kit. Brassicaceae 11 1
Unknown Brassicaceae n.a. 3
1 Conservation status according to Golubev (1996): l=occurs only at one location; 3=occurs at 6-10 locations; 6=very rare; 9=rare; ll=quite rare; 12=scarce; 13=quite common; 14=common.
The present collecting mission was conducted from June 26 to July 7, 2009 as a joint project between the national genebanks of Ukraine, NCPGRU, Kharkiv) and Canada (Plant Gene Resources of Canada, PGRC, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan). Local expertise for Crimea was provided by botanists from the State Nikitsky Botanical Gardens, Yalta. A driver with local experience from the Nikitsky Botanical Gardens was part of the collection team. Germplasm was collected from 57 locations mostly along the mountainous southern coastline of Crimea, including the nature reserve "Cape Martyan" close to the village Nikita, and the archaeological park "Ayu-Dag" (Figure 1).
Ijio.i.iciciib HaKHTCKoro 6oTaHHqecKoro caaa. 2010. Bwn. 101
9
Figure 1. Map of Crimea indicating the collecting sites. Sites in close proximity are only represented by one dot only. The area of the Crimean Mountains is shaded.
On the Kerch peninsula, collections were made in the nature reserves "Opuk" at the coast of the Black Sea and "Kazan tip" at the coast of the Sea of Azov.
Collected plant material
A total of 127 accessions covering 16 families, 55 genera and at least 66 species were collected (Table 1). In 35 instances, mostly grasses and forage legumes, the mature plants could only be identified on the genus level and the species identification will be conducted during the first genebank regeneration. Poacea (41%), Fabacea (36%) and Brassicaceae (9%) dominated in the collected material, as the remaining 13 families were represented by one or two species each.
About 34% of the collected accessions are wild relatives of field crops. The populations of wild lentils occurred on dry rubble in sparse stands of native oak (Oercus pubescens Willd.) and juniper (,Juniperus excelsa Bieb.). Spring 2009 was dry and by end of June most wild lentil plants had shattered their seeds, so they had to be picked from the ground (Figure 2). Eight accessions of L. ervoides and L. nigricans were found at different locations. These accessions will be further investigated regarding their disease resistance to lentil anthracnose.
Wild relatives of the major cereals wheat, barley, oat and rye were found. With the exception of wild einkom, Triticiim baeoticum, the cereal wild relatives found during this mission are not classified as being rare on Crimea (Table 1). The first report of T baeoticum is by M. Bieberstein from 1809; after 1967 it was missing (Dorofeev et al. 1979) but Bockelman (1999) reported collecting this species as well. The reduction of agricultural intensity after 1990 in the southern Crimea may have allowed for small populations of T. baeoticum to become larger in recent years. Among the seven accessions of wild einkom forms with white, red and black awns occurred together in mixed populations of considerable size, but there are only few locations of this species, usually on abandoned fields or field margins (Figure 3). Cultivation of the closely related cultivated einkorn, T. monococcum L.. does presently not occur on Crimea but was part of agriculture practised by the native Tartars that were expelled from Crimea in 1944 and have been returning since 1990 (Dorofeev et al. 1979, Bagrov and Rudenko 2004). A search for Aegilops tauschii Coss. at the shores of the Sea of Azov on the Kerch peninsula was not successful, although its occurrence for this location was
documented in 1982 by an according herbarium specimen. The wild relative of rye Secale sylvestre was found on dry grassland close to the shores of the Sea of Azov and wild relative species of barley, genus Hordeum L., were frequent.
Figure 2. Lens ervoides (Brign.)Grande in native habitat (left) with seeds mostly shattered (right)
The hexaploid wild oat species A. sterilis was common on dryer, open and slightly disturbed locations. A. fatua was found as a weed in a bread wheat (Triticum aestivnm L.) field. The tetraploid A. barbata Pott ex Link and the diploid A. ericmtha Durieu, both documented in the Nikitsky Botanical Gardens Herbarium, were not found at the expected locations.
The perennial wild cabbage Brassica incana was collected from the shores of the Black Sea at cap "Cape Ayu-Dag". which is difficult to access by foot (Figure 4). A healthy populations of this rare species exists here. It represents the most eastern occurrence of the disjunctive distribution range of the wild species of the genus Brassica in the Mediterranean-Atlantic area of Europe and the Near East (Snogerup et al. 1990). This species belongs to the primary genepool for breeding of cultivated cabbage (B. oleracea L.) and to the secondary genepool for breeding rapeseed (B. napus L.) (Gladis and Hammer 2001). The location may become more influenced by bathing tourists due to its easy accessibility by boat from the seaside; such excursions seem quite popular and the location is closed to the tourist centres Yalta and Alushta. At the same location, plants of Pisum elathis Bieb. were found, but the seeds were all shattered and could not be collected. It has been suggested that both Brassica incana and Pisum sativum may be escapes from medieval gardens of a monastery that existed on Cape Ayu-Dag and established as wild plants.
A remarkable richness of the genus Linum exists in Crimea and Golubev reports 16 wild species of this genus for Crimea. Seed material was only collected from Linum perenne subsp. anstriacum, while some other species were in full flower when collecting (Figure 5). These species are crop wild relatives and have also ornamental potential. The wild habitats of the Crimean Mountains, the southern shore and the Kerch peninsula are particularly rich in grassland plants and many leguminous species (Fabaceae) that have economic potential as forages. Features such as cold and drought tolerance may be found m this germplasm. Nine collected accessions have potential as medicinal plants.
The seven seeds samples of crop germplasm collected were either bought on local markets (coriander, cumin, chickpea, garden bean) or occurred on ruderal sites (barley, wheat, white mustard). Compared to other regions of Ukraine, home gardening and small scale agriculture was not as visible in the areas visited during this expedition. An exception may be the local type of red and flattened Allium cepa L. which was offered frequently by street vendors in the region around Yalta (Figure 6).
Figure 3. Population of Triticum baeoticum Boiss. with black, read and white glumes and awns from one location close to Feodosiya.
¿¡Mifflt'i^HM
gSt^ ^L Av
Figure 4. Fruiting perennial Brassica inccmct at cap "Cape Ayu-Dag".
Figure 5. Linum tenuifolium L. L. corymbulosum Reichenb. and L. austriacum L. from a dry meadow close to village Orlinoye, southern Crimea.
Figure 6. Local type of Allium cepa L. popular in Crimea.
Based on this observation, it seems most likely that landraces of field or garden crops have for the most vanished from Crimea, although the returning Tartars may bring some of such material back from western Siberia or central Asia.
The Kerch peninsula has a continental climate and very low precipitation compared to the southern coast of Crimea. The nature reserves Kazantip and Opuk on the Kerch peninsula showed a
wide diversity of plants that could be explored as ornamental plants for harsh continental climates in western Canada, where the Canadian national genebank is located. Wild relatives of oilseed Brassicas of the genera Camelina and Crambe were frequent on the locations visited on the Kerch peninsula. Both, the Kazantip and the Opuk nature reserves have been assigned highest priority regarding the preservation of biological diversity of Crimea (Korzhenevsky and Sadogursky 2006). Material collected from the Kerch peninsula is useful when looking for winter hardiness, drought and salt tolerance in the related cultivated species. Material collected from the mud vulcanos close to the village Bondarenkovo, e.g. Lepidium crassifolium, is adapted to grow on very basic soils (/;H 10,4) with high concentration of toxic salts (Korzhenevsky and Klyukin 1991), and is of interest when looking for such extreme adaptation.
Conclusions
Crop wild relatives from Crimea deserve attention as plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Maxted et al. (2008) have pointed at the growing threats to crop wild relatives in the Mediterranean region during recent years in other parts of Europe. Such pressure on the native flora is increasing in Crimea. The change to a market economy after 1990, the return of the native Tartars and the active development of tourism and recreational housing in recent years influence the native habitats. The dynamics in the populations of crop wild relatives over time were obvious as some were more frequent than expected (Triticum baeoticum) while others documented in the recent past could not be found (Aegilos tauschii). The State Nikitsky Botanical Gardens at Yalta will have an important role in protecting the plant diversity of Crimea for future generations. Depositing such germplasm in genebanks for ex situ conservation will be part of a strategy, but protection of the natural habitats including monitoring of the populations dynamics should have highest priority.
Acknowledgements
The assistance of Dr. A. R. Nikiforov and Mr. R. R. Voloshin, botanists at Nikitsky Botanical Gardens, was essential for detecting the rare species. We thank Mr. V.M. Chivatayev for hosting us at the Kazantip Nature Reserve and Mr. S.N. Kasiyanov for his excellent driving. Funding was received from the Saskatchewan Pulse Growers and the Matching Investment Initiative of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
References
1. Agayev M.G. 1994. Evgenij Vladimirovic Vul'f. In: Dragavtsev, V.A., Lebedev D.V., Vitkovsky V.L., Pavlukhin Yu. S, Lassan T.K. and Blinova N.M. (eds.) Nikolai Ivanovich Vavilov's associates, researchers of plant gene pool, pp. 104-112. (In Russian).VIR, St. Petersburg.
2. Bagrov M.V. and Rudenko L.G. (eds.) 2004. The autonomous republic of Crimea - Atlas. Simferopol, Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University.
3. Bockelman H. 1999. Report on Plant Collection in the Crimea, Ukraine July 25 - August 6, 1999. Not published report to USDA.
4. Cubero J.I. 1984. 16. Taxonomy, distribution and evolution of the lentil and its wild realtives. In: Witcombe J.R. and Erskine W. (eds.) Genetic resources and their exploitation - chickpea, faba beans and lentils, pp. 187-203. Martinius Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk, The Hague.
5. Dorofeev V.F., Filatenko A.A., Migushova E.F., Udachin R.A. and Jakubciner M.M. 1979. Wheat, flora of cultivated plants, Vol. 1. (In Russian). Kolos, Leningrad.
6. Gladis T. and Hammer K. 2001. Nomenclatural notes on the Brassica oleracea-group. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48, 7-11.
7. Golubev V.N. 1996. Biological flora of Crimea. 2nd. Ed. (In Russian). Nikitsky Botanical Gardens, Yalta, 125 pp.
8.Greene S. 2008. Collecting annual Medicago germplasm in the Crimean peninsula, Ukraine in 2008 final trip report. Not published report to USDA.
9. Korzhenevsky V.V. and Klyukin A.A. 1991. Vegetation description of mud volcanoes of Crimea. Feddes Repertorium 102, 137-150.
10. Korzhenevsky V.V. and Sadogursky S.E. 2006. Foreword, the nature reserves of the Kerch peninsula: modernity and perspectives. (In Russian). In: Korzhenevsky V.V. and Sadogursky S.E. (eds.) Biodiversity of nature reserves on Kerchensky peninsula: Collected scientific works, Vol. 126, pp. 5-7. Nikitsky Botanical Gardens, Yalta.
11. Maxted N., Kell S.P., Ford-Lloyd B.V. 2008. Crop wild relative conservation and use: establishing the context. In: Maxted N., Ford-Lloyd B.V., Kell S.P., Iriondo J.M., Dulloo M.E. and Turok J. Crop wild relative conservation and use. CABI, Wallingford, pp. 3-30.
12. Regel С. 1943. Die pflanzengeographische Stellung der Krim [The plant-geographic position of Crimea]. (In German). Plant Systematics and Evolution 92, 25-49.
13. Snogerup S., Gustafsson M. and von Bothmer R. 1980. Brassica sect. Brassica (Brassicaceae) I. Taxonomy and variation. Willdenowia 19, 271-365.
14. Tullu A., Buchwaldt L., Luisdorf M., Banniza S., Barlow В., Slinkard A.E., Sarker A., Tar'an В., Warkentin Т. and Vandenberg A. 2006. Sources of resistance to anthracnose {Colletotrichum truncatum) in wild Lens species. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53, 111-119.
15. Walter H. 1943. Die Krim. Klima, Vegetation und landwirtschaftliche Erschliessung [Crimea. Climate, vegetation and agricultural exploration], (In German). Engelhard, Berlin. 104s.
Рекомендовано к печати д. б. н. Захаренко L. С.
