CC BY
28
Ukrainian Journal of Ecology
UkrainianJournal of Ecology, 2017, 7(3), 134-138, doi: 10.15421/2017_61
ORIGINAL ARTICLE UDC595.78(94)
The taxonomic status of Cossus cossus afghanistanus (Lepidoptera, Cossidae) from Afghanistan: insights from molecular
and morphological data
Nazar A. Shapoval1*, Roman V. Yakovlev2, Galina N. Kuftina2
1 Department of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia. 2Altai State University, Leninapr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. Corresponding author. E-mail: nazaret@bk.ru Submitted: 12.07.2017. Accepted: 15.08.2017
In our study we use a 658 bp fragment of the COIgene to analyze a taxon from Afghanistan usually treated in literature as Cossus cossus afghanistanus (Daniel, 1953). The previous conclusions on taxonomy and nomenclature were not supported by molecular data therefore the question of identity of this taxon has remained unverified. Phylogenetic analysis revealed C. c. afghanistanus to be strongly differentiated from nominotypical Cossus cossus (Linnaeus, 1758) (p-distance: 6.7% ± 1.5%). Cossus c. afghanistanus forms a distinct well-supported clade in ML and BI trees. This fact, together with prominent morphological differences (wing color and genitalia structure) shows that C. c. afghanistanus represent a separate species rather than a subspecies of Cossus cossus. Key words: Lepidoptera, Cossidae, DNA barcode, Afghanistan.
Introduction
Cossus cossus afghanistanus (Cossus cossus afghanistanain original description) was described by Daniel (1953) as a separate subspecies on the basis of two male specimens from Central Afghanistan (Wardik (holotype) and Kabul (paratype)). Afghan specimens differ from those found in Central Europe in having light brown wing color. Wing pattern was considered as a major diagnostic character to distinguish between the two taxa (Daniel, 1953) (Figs. 1 a, b).
Figure 1. Males wing pattern of Cossus cossus (a, Bryansk, Russia) and Cossus afghanistanus (b, Afghanistan, Wardik; holotype,).
Recently, a morphological analysis showed that male genitalic structures of C. c. afghanistanus differ from those found in nominotypical C. c. cossus (Linnaeus, 1758) in having a smooth ridge on costal edge of valva, short processes of transtilla, and a slender phallus (Figs. 2a, b) (Yakovlev, 2009).
Figure 2. Male genitalia of Cossus cossus(a, Germany) and Cossus afghanistanus (b, Afghanistan, Panjir Valley).
Based on wing coloration and male genitalic structures, C. c. afghanistanus was treated by Yakovlev (2009) at the species level. Cossus cossus afghanistanus is known from the following specimens from Central Afghanistan (Yakovlev et al., 2015): 1 male (holotype), Afghanistan, Wardik, 7.VII.1950, Volk leg. (ZSM);
1 male, Kabul (ZMMU);
9 males, Afghanistan, Paghman, 30 km NW v. Kabul, 2100 m, 20-30.VII.1963, leg. Kasy & Vartian (MNHW);
2 males, Hindukush, bei Rukha, 2400 m, 21 .V.1977, de Freina (MWM);
3 males, 30 km NW Kabul, 2500 m, 15.V.1965 (MWM);
1 male, Paghman, 3000 m, 06.VII.1973 (MWM);
2 males, Kabul prov., Tangi (MWM);
3 males, Khurd-Kabul (MWM);
2 males, Panjir Valley, Kotul e Shava, Astana, 2500 m, 2005 (MWM).
Cossus cossus has not been reported from Afghanistan, however this species is known from adjacent countries (large series of specimens are available from southern Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, northwest China, Uzbekistan, and Tadzhikistan). Apparently, the material mentioned above can be assigned to subspecific taxon C. c. tianshanusHua, Chou, Fang et Chen, 1990 (type locality: Manas, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of northwestern China [90 km NWW Urumchi]).
It should be noted, that analyses based primarily on external morphological characters fail always clarify the phylogenetic position and identities of many Lepidoptera taxa (Hajibabaei et al., 2006; Lukhtanov et al., 2008; Dinca et al., 2013; Shapoval & Lukhtanov, 2016). Cossus c. afghanistanus has never been studied genetically, therefore its identification, taxonomic status and phylogenetic position have remained unconfirmed. Our paper provides first molecular analysis of this taxon.
Abbreviations used
MNHW Museum Natural History (Wien, Austria);
MWM Museum of Thomas Witt (Munich, Germany);
RYB collection of Roman Yakovlev (Barnaul, Russia);
ZMMU Zoological Museum at Moscow State University (Moscow, Russia);
ZSSM Zoologische Staatssammlung München (Munich, Germany).
Material and methods
One specimen of C. c. afghanistanus (RYB) was collected by I. Pljushtch, O. Pak and Ju. Skryluik on 09.VI.2016 in Kabul (Afghanistan). The specimen (GenBank accession number MF596151) was processed at the Department of Karyosystematics of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. DNA extraction from a single leg removed from the specimen was accomplished using the QIAamp DNA Investigator Kit (Qiagen, Netherlands) following the manufacturer's protocol. Standard lepidopteran barcode primers (Hebert et al. 2004) were used for DNA amplification and resulted in a 658 bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene (CO) The PCR amplification was performed in a 50 pl reaction volume containing ca.
10-20 ng genomic DNA and 0.5 mM each of forward and reverse primer, 1 mM dNTPs, 10x PCR Buffer (0.01mM Tris-HCl, 0.05M KCl, 0.1 % Triton X-100: pH 9.0), 1 unit Taq DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania), 5mM MgCl2. The temperature profile was as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 50°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Amplified fragme nt was purified using GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania). Purification was carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol. The success of PCR amplification and purification was evaluated by electrophoresis of the product in 1 % agarose gel. Purified PCR product was used for direct sequencing. Sequencing of the double-stranded product was carried out at the Research Resource Center for Molecular and Cell Technologies (St. Petersburg State University). Representatives of nominotypical C. cossuswere included in our analysis to clarify the taxonomic position and phylogenetic relationships of C. c. afghanistanus. We use obtained in the present study sequence of Dyspessa salicicola (Eversmann, 1848) from Azerbaijan (GenBank accession number MF596152) as an outgroup to root the phylogram. A complete list of specimens included in this study is given in Table 1.
A Bayesian approach and maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses were used for estimating the phylogeny. Bayesian analysis was performed using the software MrBayes 3.1.2 with the nucleotide substitution model GTR+G+I. jModelTest was used to determine optimal substitution models for Bayesian inference (BI) analysis (Posada, 2008). TRACER, version 1.4 was used for summarizing the results of the Bayesian phylogenetic analysis (http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer).
Maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis was performed using MEGA6 software (Tamura et al., 2013). We used non-parametric bootstrap values (Felsenstein, 1985) to estimate branch support on the reconstructed ML tree. Branch support was inferred from 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Table 1. List of studied material (29 specimens). (*) - sequence obtained in the present study. (**) - sequence obtained in the present study and used as an outgroup.
GenBank /BOLD Accession Number Species Locality
MF596152 Dyspessa salicicola ** Azerbaijan
MF596151 Cossus afghanistanus* Afghanistan, Kabul
FBLMV612-09 Cossus cossus Germany, Bavaria
GWORL447-09 Cossus cossus Germany, Bavaria
PHLAG857-12 Cossus cossus Germany, Bavaria
FBLMX240-11 Cossus cossus Germany, Bavaria, Oberpfalz
ODOPE725-11 Cossus cossus Germany, Bavaria
ODOPE724-11 Cossus cossus Germany, Bavaria
GWOR4165-09 Cossus cossus Germany, Bavaria
PHLAG864-12 Cossus cossus Austria, Nord Tirol
PHLAG865-12 Cossus cossus Austria, Nord Tirol
PHLAG866-12 Cossus cossus Austria, Nord Tirol
LEATD168-13 Cossus cossus Austria, Nord Tirol
LEATD248-13 Cossus cossus Austria, Nord Tirol
PHLAI331 -13 Cossus cossus Austria, Nord Tirol
PHLAI332-13 Cossus cossus Austria, Nord Tirol
PHLAI333-13 Cossus cossus Austria, Nord Tirol
PHLAH053-12 Cossus cossus Austria, Carinthia
PHLAG862-12 Cossus cossus Austria, South Tirol
PHLAG872-12 Cossus cossus Austria, Voralberg
LEFIA1067-10 Cossus cossus Finland, Uusimaa
LEFIB066-10 Cossus cossus Finland, Lapland
LEFID742-10 Cossus cossus Finland, Aland Islands
PHLAH054-12 Cossus cossus Romania
PHLAG859-12 Cossus cossus Italy, Sicily
GWORZ171 -10 Cossus cossus Italy, Calabria
PHLAC470-10 Cossus cossus Italy, South Tirol
PHLAG861 -12 Cossus cossus Italy, South Tirol
PHLAH357-12 Cossus cossus Spain, Valenciana
Results and discussion
Phylogenetic analysis of the gene COI resulted in a consensus phylogram which indicated a high level of posterior probability and bootstrap values for the clades (Fig. 3). Both (BI and ML) analyses demonstrated that all the Cossusindividuals formed two discrete, statistically supported clades. The first clade includes specimen of C. c. afghanistanus. The second clade is formed by the representatives of nominotypical C. cossus. Moreover, analysis of a dataset of 29 specimens recognized C. c. afghanistanus as a highly differentiated and strongly supported lineage with a basal position. Cossus c. afghanistanus differs from nominotypical C. cossus by numerous nucleotide substitutions (p-distance is 6.7% ± 1.5%).
Figure 3. The Bayesian tree of Cossus afghanistanus and Cossus cossus based on analysis of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene from 28 specimens. Numbers at nodes indicate ML bootstrap/ Bayesian posterior probability respectively, with non-matching clades using different analyses indicated by '-'. Scale bar = 0.3 substitutions per position. Cossus afghanistanus and Cossus cossus clusters highlighted in pink and blue respectively.
The COI gene as a part of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a widely accepted and frequently used marker in molecular and phylogenetic studies. mtDNA has numerous advantages, including lack of recombination due to uniparental inheritance and multicopy status in most cells (Avise, 2000). Furthermore, due to relatively higher substitution rates in the mitochondrial genome, mtDNA is generally less conserved than many nuclear genes, providing higher resolution for lower level phylogenies and species identification through DNA barcoding (Hebert et al., 2003). Nevertheless, several authors have pointed out that the phylogenetic studies, or species identification based on mtDNA alone, can be misleading as trees inferred from single markers sometimes display relationships that reflect the evolutionary history of individual genes rather than the species being studied (Ballard & Whitlock, 2004; Bensch et al., 2006). Moreover, mitochondrial introgression (Zakharov et al., 2009) and Wolbachia infection (Ritter et al., 2013) also can lead to erroneous phylogenetic reconstructions and species misidentification. Despite these limitations, level of genetic distances can provide indirect evidence for conspecifity/non-conspecifity of species being studied. Two allopatric taxa can be considered as different species if the COI distance exceeds the "standard" 2.7-3.0% DNA-barcoding threshold (Lambert et al., 2005). Although this level is not an absolute threshold to distinguish between species, it was demonstrated that such a deep level (ca. 3%) of differentiation between COI barcodes is practically always associated with species level of the taxa compared (Hebert et al., 2003). Thus, considerable level of genetic distances can be used as a useful criterion while deciding on the taxonomic status of a group under analysis and inferring hypotheses about species borders (Lukhtanov, 2015). Furthermore, the presence of significant genetic distances between two taxa accompanied by solid morphological differences (e.g. in wing pattern, and/or in genitalia structure) can be considered as an additional independent evidence of the existence of two distinct species.
Cossus c. afghanistanusand C. cossusappear on our reconstruction as a two strongly differentiated monophyletic groups, and the p-distance between their COI barcodes (6.7% ± 1.5%) significantly exceeds the 2.7-3.0% DNA-barcoding threshold. Additionally, C. c. afghanistanus and nominotypical C. cossus differ in characters of wing coloration and male genitalic structure. Thus, in accordance with the criteria mentioned above they should be considered as a separate species.
Acknowledgements
The financial support for this study was provided by the grant from the Russian Science Foundation no. 14-14-00541 to the Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences. The work was partially performed using equipment of Centre for Molecular and Cell Technologies of St. Petersburg State University. The authors are grateful to Prof. Boris Kondratieff (Fort Colins) for language editing.
References
Avise, J.C. (2000). Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Ballard, J.W.O., Whitlock, M.C. (2004). The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Molecular Ecology, 13(4), 729-744. doi: 10.1046/j. 1365-294X.2003.02063.X
Bensch, S., Irwin, D.E., Irwin, J.H., Kvist, L., Akesson, S. (2006). Conflicting patterns of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA diversity in Phylloscopus warblers. Molecular Ecology, 15(1), 161 -171. doi: 10.1111 /j.1365-294x.2005.02766.x
Daniel, F. (1953). Neue Heterocera-Arten und -Formen. Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 43, 252-261. Dinca, V., Wiklund, C., Lukhtanov, V.A., Kodandaramaiah, U., Noren, K., Dapporto, L., Wahlberg, N., Vila, R., Friberg, M. (2013). Reproductive isolation and patterns of genetic differentiation in a cryptic butterfly species complex. JournalofEvolutionary Biology, 26(10), 2095-2106. doi: 10.1111 /jeb.12211
Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39(4), 783-791. doi: 10.2307/2408678
Hajibabaei, M., Janzen, D.H., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W., Hebert, P.D.N. (2006). DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 103(4), 968-971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510466103 Hebert, P.D.N, Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., deWaard, J.R. (2003).Biological identification through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Science, 270(1512), 313-321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Hebert, P.D.N., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W. (2004). Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 101(41), 1481214817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406166101
Lambert, D.M., Baker, A., Huynen, L., Haddrath, O., Hebert, P.D.N., Millar, C.D. (2005). Is a large-scale DNA-based inventory of ancient life possible? Journal of Heredity 96(3), 279-284. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esi035
Lukhtanov, V.A., Dantchenko, A.V., Vishnevskaya, M.S., Saifitdinova, A.F. (2015). Detecting cryptic species in sympatry and allopatry: analysis of hidden diversity in Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 116(2), 468-485. doi: 10.1111/bij.12596
Lukhtanov, V.A., Shapoval, N.A., Dantchenko, A.V. (2008). Agrodiaetusshahkuhensissp. n. (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae), a cryptic species from Iran discovered by using molecular and chromosomal markers. Comparative Cytogenetics, 2(2), 99-114. Posada, D. (2008). jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolutioi, 25(7), 1253-1256. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn083
Ritter, S., Michalski, S.G., Settele, J., Wiemers, M., Fric, Z.F., Sielezniew, M., Sasic, M., Rozier, Y., Durka, W. (2013). Wolbachia infections mimic cryptic speciation in two parasitic butterfly species, Phengaris teleius and P. nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). PLoSONE, 8(11), 1-13. doi: 10.1371 /journal.pone.0078107
Shapoval, N., Lukhtanov, V. (2016). On the generic position of Polyommatus avinovi(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Folia Biologica (Krakow), 64(4), 267-273. doi: 10.3409/fb64 4.267
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., Kumar, S. (2013). MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30(12), 2725-2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197
Yakovlev, R.V. (2009). Systematic review of Goat Moth - Cossus cossus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Cossidae). Amurian zoological journal, 1 (1), 58-71. (in Russian)
Yakovlev, R.V., Pljustch, I.G., Skrylnik, Yu., Pak, O., Witt, Th. (2015). The Cossidae (Lepidoptera) of Afghanistan with description of three new species and special notes on the fauna of Bande-Amir National Park. Zootaxa, 3990 (1), 41-72. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3990.1.3
Zakharov, E.V., Lobo, N.F., Nowak, C., Hellma, J.J. (2009). Introgression as a likely cause of mtDNA paraphyly in two allopatric skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Heredity, 102(6), 590-599. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.26
Citation:
Shapoval, N.A., Yakovlev, R.V., Kuftlna, G.N. (2017). The taxonomlc status of Cossus cossus afghanistanus (Lepidoptera, Cossidae) from Afghanistan: insights from molecular and morphological data. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 7[3), 134-138. I ("Ol^^^^MlThk work Is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. License
