The Relationship Between Fear-Avoidance Beliefs, Disability, and Physical Capacity in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Текст научной статьи по специальности «Клиническая медицина»

33 3

2022

GNazir SNB, Pereira FA, Muhammad A, Shamsi II, Khan MU.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International L

ORIGINAL PAPER

The Relationship Between Fear-Avoidance Beliefs, Disability, and Physical Capacity in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Shaikh Nabi Bukhsh Nazir1, Feliciancus Anthony Pereira2, Atta Muhammad3, Iram Iqbal Shamsi4, Muhammad Uzair Khan5

institute of Physical Medical & Rehabilitation, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, 2Lecturer, Dewan Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Dewan University, Karachi, Pakistan, 3Lecturer, University Institute of Physical Therapy, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan, 4Senior Lecturer, Institute of Physical Medical & Rehabilitation, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, 5Post graduate student, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this study was to document the multi-dimensional profile of patients referring with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and determine the relationship among fear-avoidance belief and disability and physical capacity in the Pakistani population. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Physiotherapy Department of the Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dow University of Health Sciences. Consecutive sampling was used among the population of CLBP, and objective measures were fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ-total) and Roland Morris questionnaire (RMDQ) and pain. Each participant performed a physical capacity test, which included a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), abdominal muscular endurance (AME), hand grip strength (HGS), and Functional reach test (FRT). Result: Of the 136 participants, 70(51.5%) were males. The mean and SD of the tests performed were: 6MWT (487.97±51.46), AME (9.31±4.68), FRT (35.14±2.79), HGS (33.31±14.55), VAS (5.51±1.27), RMDQ (18.25±2.17), FABQ-total (48.18±5.31). Multivariate regression revealed that symptom duration, FRT, AME, HGS, VAS, RMDQ were all found to be associated with fear-avoidance belief, accounting for 60% (adjusted R2 = 0.60) of variability. Likewise, only 6-MWT, FRT, FABQ-total were the significant predictors of disability (adjusted R2=0.282). Conclusion: It has been demonstrated that sub-maximal exercise capacity, strength, endurance, pain and flexibility are the contributing factors for the change in disability and fear-avoidance beliefs among the individuals with CLBP. The findings of this study could have inference for increasing productivity both at individual and organizational levels by formulating effective strategies to manage CLBP.

Mediterr J Rheumatol 2022;33(3):305-10 https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.33.3.305

Article Submitted: 21 Jul 2021; Article Accepted: 21 Oct 2021; Available Online: 30 Sep 2022

Corresponding Author:

Dr. Shaikh Nabi Bukhsh Nazir (PT) Department of Physiotherapy Institute of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

E-mail: nabibux_903@hotmail.com Tel.: +923432883538

Keywords: low back pain, correlation, pain, psychosocial factors, physical functional performances

ABBREVIATIONS

6MWT: 6-minute walk test AME: Abdominal muscular endurance CLBP: chronic low back pain FABQ-total: fear-avoidance beliefs

FRT: Functional reach test HGS: Hand grip strength RMDQ: Roland Morris Disability questionnaire

VAS: Visual Analogue Scale

Cite this article as: Nazir SNB, Pereira FA, Muhammad A, Shamsi II, Khan MU. The Relationship Between Fear-Avoidance Beliefs, Disability, 305 and Physical Capacity in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2022;33(3):305-10.

INTRODUCTION

Pain that lasts longer than 12 weeks, despite treatment of initial injury, is termed as CLBP.1 Individuals who do not seem to recover in this time frame undergo a slower recovery, which burdens the health-care system, and is a reason of absenteeism from work in 38% of cases reported in Pakistan with CLBP.2,3 Treatment options of low back pain are not only based on the duration of symptoms but also the cause, radicular symptoms, and any potential anatomical abnormalities.4 Many different factors play a role in the disability regarded with CLBP. Prognostic psychosocial factors need to be assessed in patients with CLBP. Fear-avoidance belief is one factor that is commonly evaluated.5 According to the diathesis stress model, distinct characteristics present before the onset of CLBP are stimulated in this stressful period; this can lead to eluding and incapacitating attitudes.6 Age and gender are considered risk factors. With regard to gender, there is a greater frequency of low back pain in females as compared to males.7

The fear-avoidance model suggests that patients with LBP tend to avoid those activities that are anticipated to cause pain. In long run, this avoidance behaviour results in disuse and deconditioning, thus causing impaired performance in physical tasks.8

Physical capacity at the level of the person embodies concepts such as strength, flexibility, endurance, and balance - acts as a pathway that facilitates the individual ability to perform an activity. Reduced capacity due to deconditioning contributes to activity restrictions. Physical capacity in previous research was confined to VO2 max, but other studies varied regarding the outcome measure used were trunk muscle static and dynamic strength, walking velocity, and flexibility.9-11' Higher muscle strength, aerobic capacity, endurance, and flexibility as physical capacity variables contribute to greater improvement in the severity of psychological state and cognitive ability.1213

Although different studies have suggested a more or less positive relationship of physical capacity with fear of injury and disability, there is limited evidence to support this conjecture, thus requiring further investigation.101415 Their findings might have been more conclusive if the studies included reliable objective measures of fear of injury, both genders, and the onset of symptom duration.101415 Therefore, the present study was planned to determine the relationship between disability and physical capacity and fear-avoidance beliefs of those attending the physiotherapy outpatient department due to CLBP, while also considering the different profiles of patients.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study was carried out from June 2019 to January 2020, at the Institute of Physical Medicine

and Rehabilitation, Dow University of Health Sciences. Following the approval from the institutional review board (IRB-UOL-FAHS/732/2020), sample size of 114 was calculated using Open-Epi 3.0 with a confidence interval CI of 95% and 5% precision. Prevalence was estimated from a previous study conducted on the country survey of Germany where 92% of all participants had low back pain.16 Consecutive sampling technique was used for patient selection. Inclusion criteria included: individuals with low back pain of either gender lasting longer than 3 months. Those who had undergone recently lapa-roscopic or spinal surgery, those with the presence of musculoskeletal disorders or pregnancy or neurological problems such as stroke, those who had low back pain with underlying specific cause were excluded. Those who reported pain during the testing procedure of exercise capacity were also excluded. A written informed consent form was provided before enrolment to ask for their consent for participation in the study. After obtaining informed consent, a self-administered questionnaire was given to them. Participants who could read were given forms to self-response; those unable to do so filled their forms with the help of their caretakers. The survey collected information sheet consisted of a close-ended questionnaire with socio-demographic factors including the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMDQ), Visual Analogue Scale, and Physical capacity test. 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), abdominal muscle endurance (AME), Functional reach test (FRT) and Hand Grip Strength (HGS) were recorded as a measure of physical capacity (PC) variables. RMDQ is a self-reported questionnaire used as an indicator of level of disability in individuals with low back pain. It comprised of 24 questions with a total score of 24, which had both an Urdu and an English version. The score of up to 15 indicates low-level disability and greater than 15 is considered as a high level of disability. It has a reliability of 0.91.17

FABQ is another self-reported 16-item questionnaire consisted of two subscales, FABQ-physical activity (FABQ-P) and FABQ-work (FABQ-W); FABQ-P used to assess belief and attitude towards physical activities (5 items, range 0-30), FABQ-W is focused specifically to assess the attitude towards the work (11 items, range 0-66). A low score on both subscales shows weak fear-avoidance beliefs.18

VAS is a one-dimensional indicator of pain severity assessed in either vertical or horizontal orientation line of 1 -100 mm. VAS is suggested as: no pain (0-4 mm), mild (5-44 mm), moderate (45-74 mm), and severe (75-100 mm). Its ICC value is 0.97.19 6MWT is a sub-maximal exercise performance test to assess the aerobic capacity of an individual by measuring the distance travelled in 6 minutes. ICC=0.8720 HGS was checked through a dynamometer; subjects

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS, DISABILITY, AND PHYSICAL CAPACITY IN PATENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN

dominant 2nd-5th mid-phalanx facing the handle for 3 seconds.15 AME was measured on basis of complete repetitions of sit-ups in 30 seconds.15 FRT was also carried out to determine the flexibility by measuring a distance the subject can reach forward while in a fixed sitting position.15 The distance was measured through the tape.

Multivariable linear regression was applied in identification of predictors of PC in RMDQ and FABQ in individuals with CLBP. The scores obtained from FABQ and disability were analysed and entered separately as dependent variables. The variables used were adjusted with age, gender, Body Mass Index, and the onset of symptom duration. P<0.05 was regarded as significant, and all statistical tests were performed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULT

In total, 136 (150) patients met the inclusion criteria; the sample consisted of an average age of 40.16+10.61 with males in majority 70 (51.5%) Table 1. Most of the participants had symptom duration from 6 months to 1 year 55 (40.4%). The mean and SD of the tests performed were: 6MWT (487.97+51.46 m), AME (9.31+4.68), FRT (35.14+2.79 mm), HGS (33.31+14.55 kg.f), VAS (5.51+1.27), RMDQ (18.25+2.17), FABQ-PA (16.27+1.40), FABQ-W(19.02+2.77), FABQ-total (48.18+5.31).

Table 2 lists the correlation between 6MWT, AME, FRT, HGS, VAS, RMDQ and FABQ-tot. 6MWT (r=-0.477*, P < 0.01), FRT (r=0.326, P < 0.01), HGS (r=0.425, P < 0.01) and VAS (r=0.239, P < 0.01) showed significant correlation with FABQ-T. 6MWT (r=-0.684, P < 0.01), AME (r=-0.325, P < 0.01) and FRT (r=-0.374, P < 0.01) showed significantly negative correlation with RMDQ. Table 3 lists the Multivariable linear regression determinants of FABQ-Total and RMDQ. In model 1 (FABQ-

Table 1. Clinical and demographics characteristics of patients with CLBP.

Variables N=136

Gender n (%)

Male 70(51.5%)

Female 66(48.5%)

Onset of symptom duration n (%)

3month-6month 51(37.5%)

6month-1year 55(40.4%)

1year-2year 13(9.6%)

>2year 17(12.5%)

Professional status n (%)

Unable to work due to CLBP 56(41.2%)

Active 80(58.8%)

BMI (kg\m2), mean (SD) 28.3(3.84)

Age (years), mean (SD) 40.1(10.61)

Total), the value of R-squared is 0.600, which means that there is 60% of the variation that is explained by this general linear model. Symptom duration, AME, FRT, HGS, VAS, and RMDQ were the statistically positive predictors of the dependent FABQ-Total variable. As the onset symptom duration increased by 10 units, there is the risk of fear-avoidance belief increases by 2.54 points; as the Abdominal muscular endurance increased by 10 units, there is the risk of fear-avoidance belief increases by 3.44 points. As the functional reach test increased by 10 units, there is the risk of fear-avoidance belief increases by 2.44 points; as the hand grip strength increased by 10 units, there is the risk of fear-avoidance belief increases by 4.99 points. As the visual analogue scale

Table 2. Correlation among 6MWT, AME, FRT, HGS, VAS, RMDQ, and FABQ-tot (N=136).

Variables 6MWT AME FRT HGS

6MWT 1

AME 0.725** 1

FRT 0.447** 0.418** 1

HGS 0.246** 0.085 0.373** 1

VAS 0.041 -0.337 ** -0.086 0.182*

RMDQ -0.684** -0.325** -0.374** -0.051

FABQ-tot -0. 477** 0.021 0.326** 0.425**

VAS

RMDQ

FABQ-tot

1

-0.241 0.239**

1

0.146

1

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); Fear-Avoid-

ance Beliefs Questionnaire: FABQ-tot; Roland Morris Questionnaire: RMDQ; Visual Analogue Scale: VAS; 6-minute walk test: 6MWT; abdominal muscle endurance: AME; Functional reach test: FRT; Hand Grip Strength: HGS.

Table 3. Multivariable linear regression analysis of determinants of FABQ-total and RMDQ.

Unstandardised

Coefficients_Standardised

Model B Std. Error Coefficients Beta P-value 95% CI

1 (Constant) 5.763 8.596 0.504 (-11.250, 22.777)

Gender 0.566 0.626 0.053 0.368 (-0.674, 1.805)

Age 0.038 0.028 0.076 0.180 (-0.018, 0.093)

BMI 0.067 0.079 0.048 0.399 (-0.089, 0.223)

onset of symptom duration 1.367 0.393 0.254 0.001* (0.590, 2.144)

6-minute walk test -0.010 0.010 -0.101 0.291 (0.030, 0.009)

Abdominal muscular endurance 0.391 0.101 0.344 0.000* (0.192, 0.590)

Functional reach test 0.463 0.142 0.244 0.001* (0.182, 0.745)

Hand Grip Strength 0.182 0.028 0.499 0.000* (0.127, 0.237)

Visual Analogue Scale 0.826 0.274 0.198 0.003* (0.285, 1.368)

Rolland Morris Disability 0.549 0.156 0.224 0.001* (0.241, 0.857)

2 (Constant) 25.398 4.135 0.000 (17.213, 33.583)

Gender 0.022 0.344 0.005 0.950 (-0.660, 0.703)

Age 0.010 0.015 0.048 0.526 (-0.021, 0.040)

BMI 0.018 0.043 0.033 0.671 (-0.067, 0.104)

onset of symptom duration 0.020 0.225 0.009 0.931 (-0.426, 0.465)

6-minute walk test -0.016 0.005 -0.384 0.002* (-0.027, -0.006)

Abdominal muscular endurance -0.010 0.058 -0.022 0.859 (-0.126, 0.105)

Functional reach test -0.165 0.080 -0.212 0.041* (-0.322, -0.007)

Hand Grip Strength -0.018 0.018 -.0121 0.306 (-0.053, 0.017)

Visual Analogue Scale -0.303 0.153 -0.177 0.050 (-0.606, -0.001)

FABQ-total 0.165 0.047 0.403 0.001* (0.072, 0.257)

FABQ model 1; ANOVA P<0.001; adjusted R2 0.600; *Statistical significance at P < 0.05. RMDQ model 2; ANOVA P<0.001; adjusted R2 0.282; *Statistical significance at P < 0.05.

increased by 10 units, there is the risk of fear-avoidance belief increases by 1 .98 points; as the disability scale increased by 10 units, there is the risk of fear-avoidance belief increases by 2.24 points. In model 2 (RMDQ), the value of R-squared is 0.282, which means that there is 28.2% of the variation that is explained by this general linear model. 6MWT, FRT, and VAS were the statistically negative predictors of the dependent RMDQ variable. For every 10 unit decrease in 6MWT, there is 3.84 points increase in the RMDQ. As the functional reach test decreased by 10 units, there is the risk of RMDQ increases by 2.1 2 points; only one outcome measure revealed every 10 unit increase of fear-avoidance belief could lead to an increase in 4.03 points of disability.

DISCUSSION

We found that FABQ-T is strongly associated with VAS, symptom duration, AME, disability, and FRT. This important finding reflects that disability affects not only the performance capacity but also how individuals interpret their pain. This result corroborates with previous work of Zale et al. in which authors determined that strong fear-avoidance beliefs were indicative of occupation-related disability among individuals with sub-acute low back pain. Findings of the systematic review propose that pain-related anxiety may predict disability evaluated during initial course of transformation from sub-acute to chronic pain.21

In the current study, FABQ total score was 48.18±5.31. A possible explanation for this finding may be attributed

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS, DISABILITY, AND PHYSICAL CAPACITY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN

to the degree of disability and pain as measured by the RMDQ 18.25+2.17 and VAS 5.51+1.27. Present study findings contrast the finding of the previous study, which might be due to higher mean age and inclusion of LBP patients with radiating pain and history of the accident, in the majority cases.22

The average score of FABQ-PA in this study was 16.27+1.4 which was not parallel with Salama et al.23 Their study reported the mean score of 21.2 + 5.8 and the findings of the study of Guclu et al. was 14.57 ± 6.25.24) Our study had a larger sample size of 136 with the male majority of 70 (51.5%) which might be the reason for variation in the degree of physical activity across these studies.

In the present study, FABQ-W was 19.02+2.77, which was not consistent with findings of Salama et al, who documented a mean score of 30.5 + 11.4.23 The present finding is not in line with the result of Guclu et al who reported a score of 15.19 + 9.69.24 The plausible reason for this inconsistency might be the subjects, who were away from work due to illness. In the present study, RMDQ mean score was 18.25+2.17. The finding of this study is in contrast with the previous study demonstrated a mean score of RMDQ 10.7±4.4, which might be a result of a small sample size of 55. Out of 55 subjects with LBP, 65.5% had chronic pain in Chung et al study.22 Apart from flexibility, RMDQ was also significantly associated with sub-maximal exercise capacity and fear of injury in this study. The present study finding is further supported by the research of Verbunt et al., who obtained a mean RDQ score of 11.45: females felt distinctly more disabled than males and reported a significant association between fear and disability. However, they were not able to confirm the physical de-conditioning with fear of injury using the VO2 max.14) The current study purported the link between sub-maximal exercise (aerobic capacity) with fear of injury (r=-0.477*, P=0.000).

There was significant correlation between FABQ-T with FRT (r=0.326), HGS (r=0.425) and VAS (r=0.239). The previous study, which was conducted on association of fear-avoidance beliefs with pain and disability in Mexicans with CLBP, identified a positive association among functional disability (r=0.603, P<0.001), recorded on the Roland-Morris scale, and pain (r = 0.234, p = 0.03) with high scores on the FABQ as a dependent variable. However, FABQ demonstrated significant differences in gender, with greater scores in males as compared with females.25 Conversely, another study found an inverse relationship between disability and depression and anxiety levels. The same association was present between physical function and anxiety and depression. Regression model testing revealed that there were significant effects of independent variables on physical function (F=16.722; p=0.000). Physical functionality at a

rate of 0.251 (R2=0.251) was attributed to pain severity and fear avoidance.24*

On further exploration of the amount of relationship of the fear-avoidance model, found a positive relationship with symptom duration and hand grip strength checked on the side with pain. However, previous research conducted on the exploration of correlation reported a negative relationship between two variables because the sample size consisted of males with a lower mean age.15 There are at least two potential limitations concerning the results of this study. The first limitation concern is selection bias, as it was a single-centre study carried at the outpatient physiotherapy department. Another possible limitation was that the study had not enrolled the participants who were taking medications. Despite these limitations, the present study has enhanced our understanding on the relationship of fear-avoidance belief and disability and physical capacity of individuals with CLBP. We expect that the present research will inspire additional investigation in this important area.

CONCLUSION

Changes in disability and fear-avoidance beliefs may be an important mediating variable for sub-maximal exercise capacity, strength, endurance, and flexibility in individuals with CLBP. The findings of this research may have implications for increasing productivity at the individual and organizational levels through the formulation of effective strategies for the management of CLBP.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Nazir SNB, Periera FA, Atta M, Shamsi II and Khan MU. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Nazir SNB and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

FUNDING

No funding was received for this study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

GRANT SUPPORT & FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

Following the approval from the institutional review board (IRB-UOL-FAHS/732/2020), participants were provided with information about the study aim, and then, written informed consent was obtained from each of them.

REFERENCES

1. NINDS. Low back pain fact sheet 2020 [cited 2020 28th July]. Available from: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Patient-Caregiver-Education/Fact-Sheets/Low-Back-Pain-Fact-Sheet.

2. Nazir SNB, Akhtar S, Mirza Baig AA. Frequency of sleep disturbance with chronic low back pain: a cross sectional study. J Pak Med Assoc 2020;70(5):869-71.

3. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999;354(9178):581-5.

4. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of P. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017;166(7):514-30.

5. Trinderup JS, Fisker A, Juhl CB, Petersen T. Fear avoidance beliefs as a predictor for long-term sick leave, disability and pain in patients with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018;19(1):431.

6. Ibrahim ME, Weber K, Courvoisier DS, Genevay S. Big Five Personality Traits and Disabling Chronic Low Back Pain: Association with Fear-Avoidance, Anxious and Depressive Moods. J Pain Res 2020;13:745-54.

7. Fehrmann E, Kotulla S, Fischer L, Kienbacher T, Tuechler K, Mair P, et al. The impact of age and gender on the ICF-based assessment of chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2019;41(10):1190-9.

8. Igwesi-Chidobe CN, Amarachukwu C, Sorinola IO, Godfrey EL. Translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of Igbo fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire in mixed rural and urban Nigerian populations with chronic low back pain. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0216482.

9. Verbunt JA, Seelen HA, Vlaeyen JW, Bousema EJ, van der Heijden GJ, Heuts PH, et al. Pain-related factors contributing to muscle inhibition in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental investigation based on superimposed electrical stimulation. Clin J Pain 2005;21(3):232-40.

10. Demoulin C, Huijnen IP, Somville PR, Grosdent S, Salamun I, Crielaard JM, et al. Relationship between different measures of pain-related fear and physical capacity of the spine in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine J 2013;13(9):1039-47.

11. Al-Obaidi SM, Al-Zoabi B, Al-Shuwaie N, Al-Zaabie N, Nelson RM. The influence of pain and pain-related fear and disability beliefs on walking velocity in chronic low back pain. Int J Rehabil Res 2003;26(2):101-8.

12. McQuade KJ, Turner JA, Buchner DM. Physical fitness and chronic low back pain. An analysis of the relationships among fitness, functional limitations, and depression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988(233):198-204.

13. Colcombe S, Kramer AF. Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Sci 2003;14(2):125-30.

14. Verbunt JA, Seelen HA, Vlaeyen JW, van der Heijden GJ, Knottnerus JA. Fear of injury and physical deconditioning in patients with chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(8):1227-32.

15. Lee J, Park S. The relationship between physical capacity and fear avoidance beliefs in patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci 2017;29(10):1712-4.

16. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64(6):2028-37.

17. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8(2):141-4.

18. Williamson E. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Aust J Physiother 2006;52(2):149.

19. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8(12):1153-7.

20. Tsang RCC. Reference values for 6-minute walk test and hand-

grip strength in healthy Hong Kong Chinese adults. Hong Kong Physiother J 2005;23(1):6-12.

21. Zale EL, Ditre JW. Pain-Related Fear, Disability, and the Fear-Avoidance Model of Chronic Pain. Curr Opin Psychol 2015;5:24-30.

22. Chung EJ, Hur YG, Lee BH. A study of the relationship among fear-avoidance beliefs, pain and disability index in patients with low back pain. J Exerc Rehabil 2013;9(6):532.

23. Salama HM, Reda N, El Shahaly M, Nour-Eldein H. Predictors of fear-avoidance belief, pain, and disability index in patients with chronic low back pain attending rheumatology outpatient clinics. J Public Health 2020;30:417-22.

24. Guclu DG, Guclu O, Ozaner A, Senormanci O, Konkan R. The relationship between disability, quality of life and fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with chronic low back pain. Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22(6):724-31.

25. Nava-Bringas TI, Macfas-Hernandez SI, Vasquez-Rfos JR, Coronado-Zarco R, Miranda-Duarte A, Cruz-Medina E, et al. Fear-avoidance beliefs increase perception of pain and disability in Mexicans with chronic low back pain. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed 2017;57(4):306-10.