14SPECIAL ARTICLE
The Quality of Care Provided by Outpatient Mental Health Services in Georgia
Качество обслуживания внебольничными службами охраны психического здоровья в Грузии
doi: 10.17816/CP109
Original research
Eka Chkonia,1 Giorgi Geleishvili,1 Manana Sharashidze,2 Marina Kuratashvili,3 Maia Khundadze,4 Guram Cheishvili5
1 Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
2 Georgian Association of Mental Health, Tbilisi, Georgia
3 Tbilisi Mental Health Center, Tbilisi, Georgia
4 Global Initiative on Psychiatry, Tbilisi, Georgia
5 Evidence-based Practice Center, Tbilisi, Georgia
The article can be used under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license © Authors, 2021
Эка Чкония,1 Гиорги Гелашвили,1
Манана Шарашидзе,2 Марина Кураташвили,3
Майя Хундадзе,4 Гурам Чеишвилли5
1 Тбилисский государственный медицинский университет, Тбилиси, Грузия
2 Грузинская ассоциация психического здоровья, Тбилиси, Грузия
3 Центр психического здоровья, Тбилиси, Грузия
4 Глобальная инициатива по психиатрии, Тбилиси, Грузия
5 Научно-практический центр, Тбилиси, Грузия
Лицензия СС БУ-ЫС-ЫР 4.0 © Коллектив авторов, 2021
ABSTRACT
Georgia has recently made a commendable effort to reform mental health care. The "Concept on Mental Health Care" adopted by the Government and the two strategic plans for 2014-2020 and 2021-2031, which aimed to develop comprehensive evidence-based, culturally appropriate, and human rights-oriented mental health care, have promoted the deinstitutionalization and development of community mental health services. Since 2018, new standards of care for mental health ambulatories and mobile teams have been imposed and implemented in the state programme and funded accordingly. The study aimed to investigate the quality of care in community mental health services. As a result, we monitored the mental health ambulatories in all major cities and regional centres of the country (in total, 16 ambulatories) and the mobile teams which had at least two years of experience (in total, 14 mobile teams). The data analyses showed that the new standards for ambulatories and mobile teams increased access to and coverage of mental health care across the country. However, further effort is still needed to achieve comprehensive treatment by mental health care services.
АННОТАЦИЯ
В последние годы, в Грузии были предприняты большие усилия по реформированию системы охраны психического здоровья. В 2013 году правительством Грузии была утверждена «Концепция психиатрической помощи», а также разработаны два стратегических плана на 2014-2020 и 2021-2031 гг, что способствовало процессу деинституционализации и развитию внебольничных служб охраны психического здоровья. С 2018 года в государственной программе были введены новые стандарты оказания помощи для амбулаторий и мобильных бригад и соответственно изменилась система финансирования. Настоящее исследование направлено на изучение качества обслуживания внебольничных служб охраны психического здоровья.
Анализ данных мониторинга амбулаторий психического здоровья во всех крупных городах и областных центрах страны (всего 16 амбулатории) и мобильных бригад, которые функционируют, не менее двух лет (всего 14 сервисов) показал, что ведение новых стандартов для внебольничных служб психического здоровья расширило доступ и охват психиатрической помощью по всей стране. Тем не менее необходимы дальнейшие усилия для развития всеобъемлющего, комплексного и основанного на биопсихосоциальном подходе системы психического здоровья в стране.
Keywords: quality of care; community mental health; mobile team; ambulatory
Ключевые слова: качество обслуживания; психическое здоровье; мобильная бригада; амбулатория
INTRODUCTION
Following the growing global focus on deinstitutionalization in the past 50 years, accessible community mental health services were highlighted as a commitment in the European Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2020, with the goal of improving the well-being of patients and families.1 Georgia has made commendable efforts to reform mental health care in recent years, motivated by the growing need for affordable and efficient community mental healthcare.2
Georgia's mental health care system is managed by the Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories, Labor, Health, and Social Affairs of Georgia (IDPLHSA), which oversees health and social welfare. The ministry supports and coordinates the preparation of the legislation, strategies, action plans, and state programmes that should be adopted by the Government and the Parliament.
The "Concept on Mental Health Care"3 and the two strategic plans for 2014-2020 and 2021-2031, which have been developed and approved by the Government,4 aimed to develop comprehensive evidence-based, culturally appropriate, and human rights-oriented mental health and social care services. The Georgian mental health state programme, which has been functioning since 1995, became the subject of significant amendments in 2018. The budget has been increased significantly and more than half of the funding has been allocated to developing community services, such as community-based ambulatories and mobile teams.
Along with an increased budget (of 8,000,000 GEL), new standards for community-based services have been introduced and incorporated into the mental health state programme. The number and location of community services and the funding methodology have been changed and defined according to the populations
of the catchment areas. These changes contributed to achieving the indicator set by the mental health strategic document and the corresponding action plan for 2015-2020. The strategic document specified that by 2020 the ratio between community and institutional services in Georgia should have been 50:50. Introducing the standard of a qualitatively new type of outpatient service changed the ratio established in 2017 (7:75) to the ratio 48:52 in 2021.
The community mental health care services in Georgia include:5
Community ambulatories — specialized secondary level services, which provide care for persons with mental disorders within the area of their residence. Outpatient services are based on the biopsychosocial model and a multidisciplinary approach. Each centre serves a population of 70,000 to 100,000 inhabitants and has a staff of one psychiatrist, 1.5 nurses, and 1.5 psychologists.
Community mobile teams — intensive care for people with severe mental disorders who are frequently hospitalized or stay in hospital for a long time.
The multidisciplinary team consists of three to four staff members, including a psychiatrist, nurse, social worker, and/or psychologist. The team develops an individual care plan for each patient based on the recovery model and provides home care.
Currently, 33 mobile teams are operating countrywide, but the number and composition of the teams need further development.
Mental health crisis intervention centres for adults (aged 16-65 years) — a specialized service which serves individuals living in a particular catchment area (one team per 150,000 inhabitants) with the goal of reducing psychiatric hospitalizations. The teams consist of one team leader, one psychiatrist, one psychologist and
one social worker per 20 cases. The team serves people with acute mental health problems. These services can be provided at home (with two daily visits possible), or a person can be transferred to the crisis intervention centre. As the crisis resolves, the person must be referred to less intensive mental health services.
Residential/home care for persons with mental disorders — a specialized mental health service that offers supported housing and appropriate care to ensure the social adaptation and integration of the person with a mental disorder, as well as the maintenance/ development of their independent living skills. The assisted living facilities offer different levels of support corresponding to the diverse needs of people with mental disorders. They provide a homelike setting, organized on a recovery model and different levels of therapeutic intervention.
The distribution of the services across the regions is shown in the figure (Figure 1).6
THE AIM AND METHODS OF THE STUDY
The study aimed to investigate the quality of the care provided by the community services, such as mental health ambulatories and mobile teams, and to develop recommendations for the further improvement of the standards of care based on the results.
As a result, we monitored the mental health ambulatories in all major cities and regional centres of the country (in total, 16 ambulatories) and the mobile
teams with at least two years of experience (in total, 14 mobile teams).
The quality of care and standards of services have been studied using the following tools:
• The WHO QualityRights tool kit for assessing and improving quality and human rights in mental health and social care facilities.7
• The service monitoring tools for ambulatories (Appendix 1).
• The service monitoring tools for mobile teams (Appendix 2).
The service monitoring tools are the standardized instruments, which have been developed by the working group of experts approved by the Ministry of the Health of Georgia (number of document №01-109/™, 27.05.2017). Independent monitoring groups made up of three to four members visited the services on the spot. The information was obtained from the following sources:
The service documentation — employment contracts, internal orders and regulations, medical records, lists of the available medications, etc.
Structural interview — the standardized questionnaire based on the WHO QualityRights tool kit and monitoring tools have been used to interview the multidisciplinary team members — psychiatrists, nurses, psychologists, social workers, services users, and caregivers.
The aim and procedures of the study were clearly described to the participants. All participants signed the informed consent.
^ Compulsory psychiatric treatment (IP)
A IP Service Adult # IP Service Child
treatment
Shelter service for Multisystem disabled oeoole in children a
Psycho-social rehabilitation by Municipality
★ Assertive community
t
ntervention n children and adolescents
Shelter service for disabled people shared for more than one regions
OP Shared Service for more than one region
Crisis Intervention
Psycho-social rehabilitation
Mobile outreach team services
Mobile outreach team services shared for more than one region
Day hospital for children
Figure 1. Cartography of Mental health service provision in Georgia.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The increased budget and introduction of new standards for ambulatories and the development of mobile teams organized in all country regions have significantly increased the capacity for mental health care. The medication supply of the community services has substantially improved. The implementation of the recovery model and multidisciplinary teamwork has stimulated the development of biopsychosocial treatment approaches. More mental health professionals, e.g., psychiatric nurses, psychologists and social workers, have been trained and employed.
In parallel to these remarkable achievements, the following challenges and barriers have been identified:
The official number of patients registered with the community services exceeds the real number of service users. This statistical discrepancy distorts the actual need for mental health care services. In the table (Table 1), we can see that if the ambulatory serves all registered patients, then according to the official number of visits, this number of patients are not able to visit the ambulatory at least once per three months. There is an imbalance between biological and psychosocial care.
The services predominantly offer biological treatment. The patients are generally seen by psychiatrists and receive psychopharmacological treatment. Hence, the psychiatrists are overloaded; sometimes, the
psychiatrists have 15-20 or more patients per day while their appointment hours are five hours per day, and the average appointment time is approximately 20-25 min. Thus, the maximum number of patients per day per psychiatrist should not exceed 15-18 patients (Table 2).
According to the standards for community mental health ambulatories and mobile teams in Georgia, there are enough psychiatrists and psychologists in most community services, but still a shortage of qualified nurses and social workers. The average points for the WHO QualityRights tool kit standard 2.2.8 — "The facility has skilled staff and provides good-quality mental health services" were six points out of 10 (Figure 2).
The score for the WHO QualityRights tool kit standard 2.3. "Treatment, psychosocial rehabilitation, and links to support networks and other services are elements of a service user-driven recovery plan and contribute to a service user's ability to live independently in the community" varied from very poor to poor (= two out of 10 points). Hence, the recovery model for care and multidisciplinary teamwork is not implemented properly, and the resources of other mental health professionals are not used accordingly (Figure 2).
There are significant differences in fund distributions for medications, administrative, and other expenses across the services, which cannot be explained by the number of patients or the workload of mental health professionals
Table 1. Number of Visits per Three Months
Ambulatory N Number of registered patients % of population Number of visits Number of home visits Total visits Number of possible visits/per three months
1 10040 2,9 776 89 865 0
2 3162 0,7 1105 6 1111 1
3 2576 1,4 570 31 601 1
4 4165 1,2 994 2 996 1
5 799 0,8 180 12 192 1
6 4568 2,0 810 10 820 1
7 5810 4,1 775,5 4,5 780 0
8 301 0,5 160 6 166 2
9 1034 1,4 246 2 248 1
10 763 0,5 438 39 477 2
11 7500 1,4 1940 4 1944 1
12 3456 2,1 820 10 830 1
13 14829 5,9 1100 3 1103 0
14 738 0,8 305 4 309 1
N of Ambulatory Number of visits in ambulatories per month Number of home visits per month Number of Psychiatrists Number of Daily visits
5 305 14 2 8,9
1 360 16 2 10,4
8 180 12 1 10,7
9 775,5 45 4 11,4
2 1570 31 7 12,7
11 438 32 2 13,1
14 810 10 3 15,2
15 861 2 3 16,0
4 1776 68 6 17,1
3 3100 89 10 17,7
6 3940 20 12 18,3
7 2105 6 6 19,5
10 1420 10 4 19,9
13 1494 14 4 20,9
12 446 2 1 24,9
160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
2.1. Facilities are available to everyone who requires treatment and support
2.2. The facility has skilled staff and provides good-quality mental health services
2.3. The recovery model is implemented, Psychosocial rehabilitation and links to support networks and other services are available
2.4. Psychotropic medication is available, affordable and used appropriately
2.5. Adequate services are available for general and reproductive health
Figure 2. The data on the WHO QualityRights tool kit Team 2. The right of the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Article 25 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).
Standard 2.1. Facilities are available to everyone who requires treatment and support — eight points out of 10. Standard 2.2. The facility has skilled staff and provides good quality mental health services — six points out of 10. Standard 2.3. The recovery model is implemented. Psychosocial rehabilitation and links to support networks and other services are available — two points out of 10.
Standard 2.4. Psychotropic medication is available, affordable, and used appropriately— seven points out of 10. Standard 2.5. Adequate services are available for somatic and reproductive health — two points out of 10.
and mainly depend on the subjective interpretation of need by the owners or directors of the services (Table 3).
The results of the WHO QualityRights tool kit interviewing tools have revealed that most of the community mental health ambulatories have good infrastructure, satisfying physical conditions, and a comfortable environment, but lack sufficient space for psychosocial activities. The services are available to everyone who requires treatment and support (= nine points out of 10).
The psychiatrists are qualified to provide psychopharma-cological treatment. Psychotropic medication is available, affordable, and generally used appropriately. However, the successful implementation of a recovery-oriented model and psychosocial treatment requires additional effort. The reproductive and somatic health of the patients lacks sufficient attention. The patients with serious mental disorders who are on long-term antipsychotic treatment have limited access to necessary laboratory tests and instrumental exams (Figure 2).
There is a significant deficiency of certified social workers, especially in the regions. Therefore, in most community services, the personnel working as social workers do not have specialized education. A lack of qualified social workers and a shortage of social programmes in the community prevent resocialization and the provision of support for independent living.
In mobile teams, the numbers, qualifications, and skills of mental health professionals (e.g., the numbers of nurses, psychologists, and social workers) differ across the services, which considerably influences the quality of care.
The mobile team assessment scale, which rates the structure and composition of human resources, the nature of services, and organizational boundaries, showed an unequal distribution of resources and service provision. Only half of the mobile teams with two or more years of experience showed desirable results and fully or nearly fully could implement the standards of care and receive <85 out of a total 100 points (Table 4).
Table 3. Fund Distribution in Outpatient Services (in GEL)
Index Max Min P-value
Index of Medications (% from the total budget) 66 32 0,01
Index of salary for a Psychiatrist 1900 550 0,00
Index of salary for a nurse 1200 300 0,00
Index of salary for a psychologist 1500 400 0,00
Index of salary for a social worker 1000 125 0,01
Mobile Team N Human resources (35) Organizational boundaries (40) Nature of services (25) Total (100)
1 32 37 24 93
2 34 40 19 93
3 31 37 22 90
4 35 34 19 88
5 28 37 22 87
6 27 37 23 87
7 29 37 20 86
8 24 38 21 83
9 28 35 20 83
10 30 30 17 77
11 27 29 20 76
12 23 35 18 76
13 20 29 23 72
14 19 29 14 62
Table 4. The Mental Health Mobile Team Care Assessment Scale
The wages of mental health professionals vary and are based on the subjective decision of the administration rather than on objective criteria (qualifications, working hours, workload, etc.).
Some mobile teams share their offices with other mental health services, mainly with ambulatories, which increases the risk of access to patients' personal information and raises confidentiality issues.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results, the following recommendations have been proposed to the authorities and stakeholders: The surveillance system, staffing, and care standards should be developed according to the methodology of the WHO Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance Packages "Human resources and training in mental health"9 and "Planning and budgeting to deliver services for mental health."10
The assertive involvement of all mental health professionals (e.g., psychiatric nurses, psychologists, social workers, etc.) will enhance the accessibility and quality of care. The number of visits and consultations could be increased, and the service users could receive comprehensive biopsychosocial treatment.
The successful implementation of the recovery model requires continuing excellence in professional education. Training in human rights issues and recovery treatment should be routinely offered to psychiatrists and other mental health professionals. The regular monitoring and supervision of services are essential predictors for the further improvement of service delivery.
The introduction of the objective parameters for fund distribution warrants an equitable and fair funding system.
The strong liaison and developed referral system between mental and general health services will improve the quality of somatic and reproductive care and overall outcomes for people with mental and physical health problems.
Article history:
Submitted: 23.09.2021 Accepted: 11.10.2021
Published: 16.12.2021
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgement: The study was carried out by the Alliance for Better Mental health and Tbilisi Medical
Academy and supported by the Center for the Training and Consultancy — Tbilisi (CTC).
Conflict of interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Authors' contributions: E. Chkonia — article writing; developing the research design; G. Geleishvili — analysis of the obtained data; M. Sharashidze — reviewing of publications of the article's theme; M. Kuratashvili, M. Khundadze, G. Cheishvili — obtaining data for analysis.
For citation:
Chkonia E, Geleishvili G, Sharashidze M, Kuratashvili M, Khundadze M, Cheishvili G. The Quality of Care Provided by Outpatient Mental Health Services in Georgia. Consortium Psychiatricum. 2021;2(4):54-61. doi: 10.17816/CP109
Appendix. Supplementary data
Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi: 10.17816/CP109
Information about authors
G. Geleishvili, Psychiatrist, Assistant Professor at Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
M. Sharashidze, Psychiatrist, Head of the Georgian Association of Mental Health, Tbilisi, Georgia
M. Kuratashvili, Psychiatrist, Head of the outpatient services at the Tbilisi Mental Health Center, Tbilisi, Georgia
M. Khundadze, Psychiatrist, Project coordinator at Global Initiative on Psychiatry — Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
G. Cheishvili, Manager, Director of the Evidence-based Practice Center — Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
Correspondence to:
E. Chkonia, Psychiatrist, Professor at Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-9679 E-mail: [email protected]
References
1. WHO Mental health action plan 2013-2020. Accessed November 07, 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/ handle/10665/89966/9789241506021_eng.pdf
2. Wong B, Chkonia E, Panteleeva L, et al. Transitioning to community-based mental healthcare: Reform experiences of five countries. BJPsych International. 2021;1-3. doi: 10.1192/bji.2021.23
3. The Parliament of Georgia, Approval of the State Concept of Mental Health. Georgia Government, 2013. Accessed November 07, 2021. https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/ view/2157098?publication=0
4. Government of Georgia. Approval of the Strategic Document for Mental Health Development and the Action Plan for 2015-2020.
Georgia Government, 2014. Accessed November 07, 2021. https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/2667876?publication=0
5. Healthcare State Program. Government of Georgia, document N828. Accessed November 07, 2021. https://www.matsne.gov.ge/ en/document/view/5077572?publication=0
6. Georgian Mental Health Strategic Plan 2021-2031 (revised version). Accessed November 07, 2021. https://www.georgiancollege.ca/wp-content/uploads/student-success-and-corporate-services-mental-health-and-well-being-strategic-plan-2020-2023-georgian-college-2020-06-16.pdf
7. WHO qualityrights tool kit: assessing and improving quality and human rights in mental health and social care facilities.
Accessed November 07, 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/ handle/10665/70927/9789241548410_eng.pdf?sequence=3
8. Themes, Standards and Criteria of the WHO QualityRights tool kit. Accessed November 07, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/ item/who-qualityrights-tool-kit
9. WHO Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance "Human resources and training in mental health". Accessed November 07, 2021. https://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/Training_in_Mental_Health.pdf
10. WHO Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance "Planning and budgeting to deliver services for mental health". Accessed November 07, 2021. https://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/ services/5_planning%20budgeting_WEB_07.pdf
