Научная статья на тему 'The qualitative Pedagogical and biomechanical analysis of technical Errorsin the process of training of sportsmen for complex skills'

The qualitative Pedagogical and biomechanical analysis of technical Errorsin the process of training of sportsmen for complex skills Текст научной статьи по специальности «Строительство и архитектура»

CC BY
57
9
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
ГИМНАСТИКА / БИОМЕХАНИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ / GYMNASTIC / BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS

Аннотация научной статьи по строительству и архитектуре, автор научной работы — Suchilin Nikolay G., Shevchuk Yulia V.

In sports the exercise is regarded as a system of movements (Donskoy, 1966; Ratov, 1966; Diachkov, 1974). The notion of system, incorporating anti-elementaristic or holistic intention, is an interdisciplinary isomorphism and is widely used in all branches of science. It has an integral function that allows one to extrapolate the results and apply them wider. Since the second half of the 20th century the systems approach has become an effective means to represent and explore complex objects. The systems approach is aimed at detection of both the elements and the diversity of their internal and external links (Bertalanffy, 1973; Blauberg, 1973; Kopnin, 1973; Rapoport, 1973; Sadovsky, 1973; Markaryan, 1980; Yudin, 1980). The systems approach and the general systems theory have become the methodological foundation for development of systems analysis. Appeared in the 1960s, the systems analysis is considered an art and a science by many (Yudin, 1980). A distinguished contribution to elaboration of systems approach has been made by Pyotr K. Anokhin. Developing the notion of target reflex, introduced by Ivan P. Pavlov, Pyotr K. Anokhin articulated an idea of functional system. According to this theory the target is the acceptor of activity, but it is a useful result of an activity that is an actual system-forming factor that transforms chaotic multitude of components into a functional system (Anokhin, 1980).

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «The qualitative Pedagogical and biomechanical analysis of technical Errorsin the process of training of sportsmen for complex skills»

Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 11 (2011 4) 1612-1623

УДК 338.48-52

The Qualitative Pedagogical and Biomechanical Analysis of Technical Errorsin the Process of Training of Sportsmen for Complex Skills

Nikolay G. Suchilin* and Yulia V. Shevchuk

Siberian Federal University 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia 1

Received 1.02.2011, received in revised form 9.06.2011, accepted 17.11.2011

In sports the exercise is regarded as a system of movements (Donskoy, 1966; Ratov, 1966; Diachkov, 1974). The notion of "system", incorporating anti-elementaristic or holistic intention, is an interdisciplinary isomorphism and is widely used in all branches of science. It has an integral function that allows one to extrapolate the results and apply them wider.

Since the second half of the 20th century the systems approach has become an effective means to represent and explore complex objects. The systems approach is aimed at detection of both the elements and the diversity of their internal and external links (Bertalanffy, 1973; Blauberg, 1973; Kopnin, 1973; Rapoport, 1973; Sadovsky, 1973; Markaryan, 1980; Yudin, 1980).

The systems approach and the general systems theory have become the methodological foundation for development of systems analysis. Appeared in the 1960s, the systems analysis is considered an art and a science by many (Yudin, 1980).

A distinguished contribution to elaboration of systems approach has been made by Pyotr K. Anokhin. Developing the notion of "target reflex", introduced by Ivan P. Pavlov, Pyotr K. Anokhin articulated an idea offunctional system. According to this theory the target is the acceptor of activity, but it is a useful result of an activity that is an actual system-forming factor that transforms chaotic multitude of components into a functional system (Anokhin, 1980).

Keywords:gymnastic; biomechanical Analysis.

Introduction

The idea that emerged in methodology relatively recently is a fuzzy sets theory, introduced by American mathematician Lofti A. Zadeh (Zadeh, 1965; Zadeh, 1966). Initially mathematical, the theory of fuzzy sets can be applied to diverse branches of modern science, where the information is incomplete or imprecise. The theory is based on a well-known

philosophical proposition that the processes and the things of the real world - the elements and components of systems, the systems themselves, and the stages of development - have blurred boundaries (Biryukov, Novik, 1960).

The ideologies of systems approach, systems analysis, functional systems theory and fuzzy sets theory have formed the methodological basics of the present research.

* Corresponding author E-mail address: [email protected]

1 © Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved

- 1612 -

In the process of training and competitions different levels can be affected: biomechanical, physiological, psychological, pedagogical, etc., generating a scope of various technical, tactical, physical, psychological, and theoretical errors in the systems of movements. But on balance, the majority of errors are manifested as technical ones.

Different theoretical aspects of technical errors of athletes have been the subject-area for many researchers both Russian and foreign (Kurierov, 1961; Donskoy, 1966; Ratov et al., 1966; Diachkov, 1974; Nazarov, 1974; Gross, 1983; Gaverdovsky, 1986; Suchilin, 1989; Kornberg, 1995; et al.)

Within the boundaries of the given problematic issue the foundation for detection of athlete's technical errors has been laid (Nazarov et al., 1974) and the following ideas have emerged: the concept of the leading element, which is still valid in spite of limited practical use (Ratov et al., 1966; Diachkov, 1974; et al.); the notion of border positions (boundary postures), that helped to analyse technical errors in sports where the athlete's orientation in space during competition process is almost unchangeable (e.g. crosscountry skiing).

Materials and Methods

In the present work the following research methodology has been employed: systems approach (Bertalanffy, 1973), systems and structure analysis (Donskoy et al., 1966), comparative pedagogical and biomechanical analysis (Suchilin, 1989), biomechanical analysis (video analysis software Silicon Coach).

Results

It is necessary to determine the notion of error. All deviations from the target of movement1 are considered technical error. On the basis of our methodological concept technical

errors are initially defined qualitatively, and then quantitatively. The main procedure here is the comparative analysis between deviation and target of movement.

On the qualitative level of diagnosing technical errors the elements of mathematical theory of inequalities have been used. The basic language operators are definitions of the type "less-more", "earlier-later", "shorter-longer", "weaker-stronger", "worse-better".

A precise definition of a technical error and its clear unambiguous treatise enables to set the limit beyond which individual peculiarities of performance and permitted deviations from perfect performance stop, being a technical error.

The essence of technical error stems from the gymnast making an element with deviation from the expected perfect performance using correct technique or performing an incorrect action for the skill. The technical errors of the first type are connected with deterioration of the characteristics as a whole of a correct (in composition) technical structure of the movement, while errors of the second type are associated with its distortion and deformation.

In the process of learning we strive for some ideal target model of movement (the standard) that exists in our mind. However in mastering an exercise we normally come up against deviations from the ideal of a general or partial nature. How do we distinguish them from errors? In complex space-coordination kinds of sports, connected with the art of movement, one can be governed by three criteria. Deviations from the standard are permissible individual peculiarities of technique if the following three conditions are met:

1) deductions for executing an exercise (an element) according competition rules are not made by the judge;

2) the technique being used enables the gymnast to master more complex exercises;

3) the movements are beautiful.

If just one of these demands is not met then deviations from ideal of movement are a technical error.

It has been discovered, small deviations in themselves do not exert a substantial influence on the basic parameters of movement and its technical structure. In majority of cases the geometry of movement, worsening its overall picture. However, if they are multiple, the style of performance as a whole acquires a negative connotation that the judges will penalise. If small deviations are disregarded, they have a tendency to grow into errors which become rooted in the technical structure of movement and become conserved. A small error, if it is not removed in time, may develop into a major error.

According to their nature technical errors may be subdivided into systematic, chance and typical. Systematic errors are made constantly, the sportsman becomes accustomed to them and they are not noticed by either the gymnast or the coach. However, the judges see them well enough and penalise the sportsman for them. Chance errors arise suddenly in disadvantageous conditions (distracting factors, stressful situations). Typical errors are made by most sportsmen (e.g., a top-class gymnasts part their knees when doing flight elements, the do not let the shoulder forward enough when departing into a double somersault on parallel bars, they begin to tuck early when pushing off the horse, etc.).

When analyzing technical errors we should establish what sort of mistake it is, where and when it happened (in what period, stage or phase), its caliber and character. The following step is associated with elucidation how the error occurred and why it happened. Here we need to establish whether it was a consequence of previous deviations. A search in that direction should end with defining the first link in the chain of deviations from the standard, leading to the

apparent error. When the mistake is not corrected, one should remove all previous deviations from the target.

All technical errors may be divided into parametric and structural. In the first instance the basic parameters of the movement worsen (e.g. the height and length of flight diminish, rotation slows down). In the second, the quality of performing the movement as a whole or its individual details suffer.

The caliber of error (degree of its expression) should be determined by judging criteria, as well as by the scale of variation of movement characteristics. When they change within the bounds of the optimal scale there are no technical errors, there are only acceptable individual deviations. If the characteristics vary within the bounds of the permissible scale, they are classed as minor errors. If the limits are exceeded this is a sigh of large error.

When we analyse the technique of exercises in the flight phase, besides evaluating the quality of technical actions we need to characterise the basic parameters of flight (starting speed and main kinetic moment). The distance of flight is a function of the starting velocity of CoM. Horizontal shift is defined by the words "farclose" (in the middle of the norm), while vertical is defined by the words "high-low". We can only give a qualitative description to the main kinetic moment given from support indirectly according to the speed of rotation in flight. This is done using the words "fast-slow".

Parametric faults are caused by preceding structural errors with which they are closely associated. In structural mistakes we distinguish mistakes within the margin positions and mistakes in leading elements of coordination2. These mistakes are also inter-connected and mutually conditioned. They may have a local or total character. In the first case they have deviations from the ideal of a general character (for instance,

insufficient general bend or straightening of the body as a whole), and in the second they have local (e.g., bending the arms or legs if this is forbidden by competition rules).

When performing elements on the apparatus the gymnast normally fixes the place of grip. So to define critical positions in the phase structure in these cases it is enough to define the body's orientation in the critical positions sufficiently to use the words "early-late" in the spatial and temporal aspect. Errors of position are defined by the words "insufficient-excessive" by contrast with the geometrical target of a given critical positions.

The leading element of coordination is characterised by the place of applying major effort, its duration and degree of development and, therefore, it is determined with the help of spatial-temporal and force parameters. Technical actions linked with performing the leading element of coordination in a given phase can begin earlier or later, continue longer or shorter and be stronger or weaker than necessary. Hence to define faults in the leading element it is enough

to use three pairs of words: "early-late", "longshort" and "strong-weak". When joined together these elementary definitions form more general definitions. For example, we often use in the coaching lexicon the word sharply to mean short or powerful, while the word "slack" we take to mean long and weak.

If the error is diagnosed, the way to get rid of it becomes apparent. For example, if the sportsman performs some control movement early, the coach will have to recommend to do it later, and if it is long and weak, the sportsman should be told: "Do it more sharply".

Fig. 1 shows the structure of technical errors reflecting the above-mentioned approach.

The analysis we have made shows that the following causes of technical errors are the most typical:

• the sportsman does not have a correct picture of technique in performing the given element (he lacks an adequate target of technical structure);

• in the preceding phases there are multiple deviations from the standard

Pararriprri: #rnart Structurai errors

iMitinq

time etf apphms tffteyn

Fig. 1. Structure of technical errors

- 1615 -

or minor errors which are not corrected in time;

• the sportsman cannot perform the required movement or action because he is not prepared for it technically, physically or psychologically;

• the sportsman does not exactly know where his fault lies and (or) what he has to do through lack of information, an inadequate feed-back or incomprehensible instructions from coach;

• the sportsman does not want to perform what the coach requires of him because he thinks it incorrect or inconsequential;

• the sportsman is scared of doing the required technical action;

• the sportsman wrongly assesses his technical action as a result of incorrect self-evaluation and (or) inadequate self-control.

The technical errors of a sportsman are caused mainly by insufficient level of preparation (technical, physical, functional, psychological, and theoretical), by inferior information, inadequate feed-back and coach's mistakes. Quite often insufficient level of special physical training is the cause of technical errors when performing complex exercises.

Let us illustrate the practical application of our methodological approach. The quantitative analysis may include computerised video analysis of sports techniques. Fig.2 gives a frame by frame recording of a dismount double salto backward straight with 2/1 twist (720°) performed by D.S., a member of Russian national Artistic Gymnastics team and Master of sport international class. The dismount is performed with large error - fall during landing. The deduction is 1.0 p.

Following the principle method of analysis "from end to beginning" (Bespalko, 1970), we start from landing.

After the moment of support (landing) the gymnast falls over on his knees, committing a large error. His movements at the phase of landing don't prevent the fall. This fall is caused by technical errors in the preceding phases.

Frame #20 - the gymnast is in a bent position, and his feet reach the support early.

Frame # 19 - in the unsupported period in the phase of prepare for landing the gymnast rotates slowly. This insufficient rotation makes the gymnast bend in the hip joints instead of straightening out the body in flight before landing. At the same time the moment of inertia relative to transverse axis is reduced. The rotation becomes equally faster, but it does not prevent the fall over.

Frame #18 - the gymnast finishes a turn of 720° around the longitudinal axis in flight; a double twist is successfully performed.

Evaluating the basic parameters of flight (length, height and rotation) (Frames # 8-21), that the gymnast can not change, we have made the following diagnosis:

• height - low (not high enough), caused by insufficient vertical starting velocity of CoM in flight, insufficient rotation;

• length - far (not close enough), caused by overwhelming horizontal starting velocity of CoM in flight due to early throw, pulling the sportsman forward, and not upward;

• rotation - slowly (not fast enough), insufficient rotation, caused by insufficient kinetic moment from support and time of flight.

Border position at the moment of release (Frame # 7):

• pose - good;

• orientation in space - too early.

The leading element of coordination in the phase of working actions (throw) is diagnosed as following:

Fig. 2. Performance of the dismount double salto backward straight with 2/1 twist on the horizontal bar.

• place of applying the effort - early;

• time of applying the effort - short;

• magnitude of effort - strongly (sharply).

Border position at the end of swing phase and beginning of the throw (Frame # 3):

• pose - too much;

• orientation in space - too early.

The leading element of coordination in the phase of preparatory actions (swing and the beginning of throw) is as following:

• place of applying the effort - early;

• time of applying the effort - short;

• magnitude of effort - strongly (sharply); the legs are too bent in knees.

Border position at the beginning of pre-swing (Frame # 1):

• pose - good;

• orientation in space - too early.

Discussion

As a result of our work, the classification of technical errorshas beendeveloped, the permissible deviations from the perfect performance and their difference from technical errors have been determined. The adequate structure of technical errors of top-class gymnasts occurring during the process of sporting activity have been worked out and their reasons have been identified.

The methodology of diagnosing technical errors on a technological level has been developed and its practical use in the process of training of top-class gymnasts has been justified (based on the example of performance of the complex element with a flight phase).

The results of qualitative analysis of technique of the exercise performed by a definite sportsman demonstrate that early, short, strong and too active swing have caused an early, short

- 1619 -

and strong throw. In its turn it has caused an early release, low and far flight, insufficient time of flight and slow rotation. As a consequence the landing has been with a large technical error - a fall over.

Conclusion

1. It has been established that functionally connected phases of swing and throw after multiple repetitions are performed in an automatic programmed regime. The timely start of swing with moderate amplitude is a reasonable accent of control over such movement.

2. The analysis of technique of performing of the complex dismount double salto backward straight with 2/1 twist on the horizontal bar in accordance with our approach has identified the first link in the chain of deviations: early, short and strong swing. The reason is the fear of hitting the apparatus by legs in case of short flight.

3. The gymnast is recommended to do the swing later, longer and weaker. If the gymnast

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

can not remove the mistake, the coach should point out the optimal place of landing, stand on a rise near the bar, put a safety device on the bar (e.g., a foam mat or a bar pad) and move it quickly to a potentially dangerous place after the gymnast releases the support.

4. It has been established if the gymnast is recommended to make the swing longer and start the throw later, during the swing he stretches the muscles of the front working surface of the body too much and stretch-reflex during the throw works out less effectively. As a result, the speed of rotation in flight and its height decrease.

5. We also noted that, if the gymnast is recommended to make the throw longer and release the bar later, the result of contraction of the muscles of the working surface of the body (speed and strength) during the active throw decreases (all other conditions being equal). As a result, the speed of rotation in flight and its height also decrease.

1 The terms technical standard, pattern, optimal programme of movement, expected perfect performance are close in meaning to the term the target of movement.

2 The technical structure of exercises includes three subordinate levels — periods, stages and phases. We may divide out supported and unsupported periods of movement, within the periods — stages: accumulation and working stages, and within the stages - phases: border positions or marginal positions and the leading elements of coordination.

References

P.K. Anokhin, Functional System Theory: Main Issues, (Moscow: Nauka, 1980), in Russian.

L. Ya. Arkaev, Integrated Training of Gymnasts: The Case Study of the Russian National Team, Synopsis of thesis (St. Petersburg, 1994), in Russian.

L. Ya. Arkaev, N.G. Suchilin, "Methodological Basis for Modern System of Training Top-Class Gymnasts", Theoretical and Practical Physical Culture, 11 (1997), 17-25, in Russian.

L. Ya. Arkaev, N.G. Suchilin, How to Create Champions: The Theory and Methodology of Training Top-Class Gymnasts (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 2001), in Russian

Artistic Gymnastics, Textbook, ed. by Yu. K. Gaverdovsky, V.P. Smolevsky, (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1979), in Russian.

B.A. Ashmarin, The Theory and Methodology of Pedagogical Research in Physical Training (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1978), in Russian.

Yu.K. Babansky, The Optimasation of the Educational Process (Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1982), in Russian.

- 1620 -

Yu.K. Babansky, The Problem of Increasing the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Research: Didactic Aspect (Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982), in Russian.

R. Bellman, L. Zadeh, "Decision-making in a Fuzzy Environment", Issues of Analysis and Decision-making Procedure, Collection of Translations (Moscow: Mir, 1976), 172-215, in Russian.

N.A. Bernstein, Essays on the Physiology of Movements and Physiology of Activity (Moscow: Medicina, 1966), in Russian.

L. Bertalanffy, The History and Status of General Systems Theory, Annals of Systems Research (Moscow: Nauka, 1973), 20-37, in Russian.

V.P. Bespalko, Programmed Training (Didactic Bases) (Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1970), in Russian.

I.V. Blauberg, E.G. Yudin, Principles and Essence of the Systems Approach (Moscow: Nauka, 1973), in Russian.

G. Brankov, Basics of Biomechanics (Moscow: Mir, 1981), in Russian.

Code of Points for Women's Artistic Gymnastics Competitions, FIG (2009), in Russian.

Code of Points for Men's Artistic Gymnastics Competitions, FIG (2009), in Russian.

A.M. Dikunov, The Control of Space Parameters of Motions by Visual Media Methods (Case Study of Young and Mature Gymnasts), Synopsis of thesis (Moscow, 1972), in Russian.

D.D. Donskoy, "The Mastering of Sport Technique as a System of Movements", Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 6 (1966), 32-34, in Russian.

V.M. Diachkov, Reliability Basics of the Technical Mastery of the Sportsmen (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1974), in Russian.

S.P. Evseev, Theory and Methodology of Creating Active Motion with Specific Result, Synopsis of thesis (Moscow, 1995), in Russian.

V.S. Farfel, Control of Movements in Sport (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1975), in Russian.

P.Ya. Galperin, "Psychology of Thinking and Theory of "Stage by Stage" Formation of Mental Actions", Investigations of Thinking in Soviet Psychology (Moscow: Akademiya Pedogogicheskikh Nauk RSFSR), in Russian.

Yu. K. Gaverdovsky, Complex Gymnastic Exercises. Training, Synopsis of thesis (Moscow, 1986), in Russian.

Yu. K. Gaverdovsky, Sport Exercises. Training (Moscow, Fizkultura i Sport, 2006), in Russian.

D. Glass, D. Stanley, Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology (Moscow: Progress, 1976), in Russian.

R. Granit, The Basis of Motor Control (Moscow: Mir, 1973), in Russian.

A.F. Grinstein, The Research of Gymnast's Ability to Evaluate Space and Time Parameters of Motion, Synopsis of thesis (Leningrad: 1971), in Russian.

H. Gross, Methodology of Pedagogical Kinesiology. Terminology: Learning Material, Part 1 (Tallin, 1965), in Russian.

V.S. Gurfinkel, Ya.M. Kots, M.L. Shik, The Control of Pose (Moscow: Nauka, 1965), in Russian.

Gymnastics All-Around, ed. by Yu. K. Gaverdovsky, (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1997), in Russian.

- 1621 -

Yu. A. Ippolitov, V.I. Kuzmenko, N.G. Suchilin, "Experimental Analytical Detection of Angular Moment of the Sportsman's Body and its Representation as a 3-Component System", Control of Movements and Mastering of Technical Training in Physical Training Education, Collection of Scientific Papers (Moscow, 1978), in Russian.

I.V. Kopnin, Dialectics, Logics, Science (Moscow: Nauka, 1973), in Russian.

V.B. Korenberg, Qualitative Kinesiological Analysis as Pedagogical Means in Sport, Report on thesis (Moscow, 1995) in Russian.

N.A. Kurierov, Phases in the Actions of the Gymnast (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1961), in Russian.

A.N. Leontiev, Activity, Consciousness, Personality (Moscow: Politizdat, 1977), in Russian.

E.S. Markaryan, "Global Modelling, Integration of Science and Systems Approach", Systematic Research: Collection of 1980 (Moscow: Nauka, 1981), in Russian.

Measurement in Physical Culture and Sports, ed. by V.M. Zatsiorsky (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1982), in Russian.

V.T. Nazarov, Biochemical Basis of the Training aimed at Learning Non-cyclic Exercises (as in Artistic Gymnastics), Thesis (Moscow, 1974), in Russian.

V.T. Nazarov, "The Basis of Modelling of Physical Exercises", Biomechanics of Physical Exercises ed. by V.T. Nazarov, 1 (1974), (Riga: RPI), 26-59, in Russian.

A. Rapoport, "The Principle of Mathematical Isomorphism in the Common Theory of Systems", Systematic Research: Collection of 1973 (Moscow: Nauka, 1973), 158-172, in Russian.

I.P. Ratov, V.K. Balsevich, A.Ya. Korkh, V.N. Devishvily, Some Theoretical and Practical Aspects of The Concept of The Leading Element, Proceeding of the Final Scientific Session of All-Russian Research Institute of Physical Culture and Sport in 1965, Volume 2 (Moscow, 1966), in Russian.

V.N. Sadovsky, The Issues of General Theory as Metatheory, Systematic Research: Collection of 1973 (Moscow: Nauka, 1973), 127-146, in Russian.

M.Ya. Saraf, V.I. Stolyarov, Introduction in Aesthetics of Sports (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1984), in Russian.

B. Skinner, The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching (Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1968), in Russian.

N.G. Suchilin, Pedagogical Biomechanics as a Methodological Approach and Interdisciplinary Field of Science, Proceedings of 12th International Scientific Congress "Contemporary Olympic Games, Paralympic Games and Sports for All", Volume 2 (Moscow: Fizicheskaya Kultura, 2008), in Russian.

N.G. Suchilin, Foundation and Development of Technical Mastery when Training Exercises with Progressive Complexity, Thesis (Moscow, 1989), in Russian.

N.G. Suchilin, "Pedagogical Biochemical Analysis of Techniques of Sports Movements Based on Programme-apparatus Video-complex", Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 4 (1996), 12-20, in Russian.

N.G. Suchilin, V.S. Saveliev, G.I. Popov, Optical electronic Methods of Measuring Human Movements (Moscow: FON, 2000), in Russian.

Theory of Sport, Textbook, ed. by V.N. Platonova (Kiiv: Vishchya Shkola, 1987), in Russian.

N. Wiener, Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (Moscow: Sovetskoe Radio, 1958), in Russian.

- 1622 -

E.G. Yudin, "Methodological Nature of Systems Approach", Systematic Research: Collection of 1973 (Moscow: Nauka, 1973), 38, in Russian.

E.G. Yudin, Some Peculiarities of Systems Research Development, Systematic Research: Collection of 1980 (Moscow: Nauka, 1980), 7-23, in Russian.

L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, 3 (Vol.8, 1965), 338-353. L. Zadeh, The Notion of State in Systems Theory (Moscow: Mir, 1966), in Russian. V.M. Zatsiorsky, A.S. Aruin, V.N. Seulyanov, Biomechanics of Human Musculo-sceletal System (Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1981), in Russian.

Качественный педагогико-биомеханический анализ технических ошибок при обучении спортсменов сложным техническим действиям

Н.Г. Сучилин, Ю.В. Шевчук

Сибирский федеральный университет Россия 660041, Красноярск, пр. Свободный, 79

Статья посвящена разработке и обоснованию методики диагностики технических ошибок спортсменов. Дано определение понятия техническая ошибка. Разработаны и минимизированы основные вербальные операторы, удобные для использования в тренерской практике. Разработаны критерии дифференцировокразличий между техническими ошибками и допустимыми индивидуальными отклонениями от технического эталона. Разаработанная методика проиллюстрирована на примере анализа техники исполнения сложнейшего соскока с перекладины, исполненного высококвалифицированным гимнастом с грубой технической ошибкой, выявлено первое отклоение в цепи ошибок.

Ключевые слова: гимнастика; биомеханический анализ.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.