CC BY
63The psychophysiological differences between expert and novice rifle shooters during the aiming period
Yildiz M. 1ABCDE, Fidan U.2ABCDE 'The School of Physical Education and Sports Teaching, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey 2 Faculty of Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey
Authors' Contribution: A - Study design; B - Data collection; C - Statistical analysis; D - Manuscript Preparation; E - Funds Collection Abstract Purpose:
Material:
Results: Conclusions:
Keywords:
Determination of mental status of the rifle shooters during the shooting performance is critical for the development of mental training programs according to their skill levels. The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychophysiological differences of expert and novice rifle shooters. Fourteen expert (age: 28.08±9.12 years, height: 176.12±4.24 cm, weight: 73.56±5.28 kg) and twenty novice shooters (age: 21.08±3.12 years, height: 177.42±3.74 cm, and weight: 71.56±3.57 kg) participated in the current study. The participants performed five shootings from a distance of 10m. The averages of each shooter's five shooting scores, values of attention and meditation, and heart rate between 5-sec before shooting and shooting moment were obtained.
It was determined that shooting scores (10.02 ±0.49 vs. 7.6±2.86, p<0.01, respectively) and meditation level (71.50±21.05 vs. 52.93±20.54, p<0.05, respectively) were significantly higher in the experts while attention level (73.63±21.11 vs. 59.76±21.26, p<0.05, respectively), and heart rate (105.34±12.12 vs. 98.67±7,12 bpm, p<0.05, respectively) were found higher in the novices.
The novices and experts present different psychophysiological responses during the aiming period. It is suggested that the psychophysiological differences can be useful to categorize shooters and to provide feedback in training because it is important to develop programs according to group levels, especially in the development of mental training programs. Besides, it is determined that the mobile EEG device is an effective method for determining the mental status of athletes in sports specific activities. rifle shooting, attention, meditation, novice, expert.
Introduction
Rifle shooting is an Olympic sport in which athletes shoot a fixed target at a distance of 10 meters. The athletes have to hit the target with 10 rings that are intertwined. The most successful shot is obtained by hitting the inner ring [1]. A successful shot depends on the rifle hold, aiming accuracy and trigger control [2, 3]. Therefore, it is necessary to use both motor skills and psychological factors in the shooting process [4].In the related literature, it is reported that postural balance is the most important motor skill in rifle shooting [5]. The smallest change in posture can lead to significant changes in the score. In this context, it can be said that high postural balance and minimal movement of the rifle barrel are important determinants of the shooting performance [4]. However, It is well known that elite athletes enhance a range of sport-specific cognitive skills as well as possessing motor skills [6, 7]. Lee reported that attention and meditation are the most important psychological factors that affect performance in rifle shooting because shooting performance is very comprehensive and it requires high intense of focusing [7]. When a shooter directs his rifle to the target, he must focus on many different points (target, sight, trigger and so on). Therefore, the shooter must separate himself from the outside world and concentrate on what he does [8]. However, air rifle competitions are psychologically stressful situations for shooters. It is well known that expectations regarding performance
© Yildiz M., Fidan U., 2019
doi:10.15561/18189172.2019.0606
increase anxiety, heart rate and blood pressure in people [9]. Therefore, determination of the mental status of the athletes during the shooting performance of rifle shooters is critical for the development of mental training programs according to their skill levels. Berka et al. determined that when novices monitor their own learning progress effectively they can adopt and integrate advanced techniques in the learning process [10]. Moreover, elite athletes enhance a range of sport-specific cognitive skills [6, 7, 11]. Therefore, determining of psychophysiological differences of expert and novice athletes can be useful to categorize athletes according to group levels and to provide feedback in their mental status. Self-reports or visual assessment by an examiner are generally used to determine the mental status of athletes. However, these methods may not reliably and objectively reflect the mental status of athletes because of the implicit nature of motor learning [11].
For many years, Electroencephalography (EEG) method has been commonly used as a neurologic technique for determining psychophysiological measurements of athletes. In this application, the electrical potentials of the brain cells are recorded by the sensors placed on the head. In the EEG studies, it was found that the brain oscillation (alpha, beta, theta, and so on) was associated with specific frequency bands and mental states (calm, arousal, attention, and so on) [12]. In the EEG measurements, theta waves (4~7 Hz) are usually associated with early sleep while delta waves (0.1 ~ 3 Hz) are associated with deep sleep. Moreover, beta waves (13 ~ 30 Hz) are related with
PSYCHOLOGY
medical-biological problems of physical training and sports
mental focusing and active thought, while alpha waves (8 ~ 12 Hz) are related with relaxation or resting state [13].
The traditional EEG has to be conducted in well-controlled laboratory settings. Therefore, it is impossible measuring the mental status of athletes when performing sport specific tasks in the real world. Moreover, laboratory conditions and multi-channel wet EEG electrodes may be a stressful experience for some athletes (e.g. young or autistic children) when having a large number of electrolytes put onto their heads [11]. Due to the development in technology, it has become easier to measure the mental status of individuals using mobile EEG devices [7, 14]. Some of the EEG devices adopted a single channel dry sensor and offer a wireless, ergonomic and pain-free EEG monitoring solution to researchers. Therefore, it is extremely easy-to-use for measuring the mental status of athletes during sport specific tasks [15, 16, 17]. Mobile devices can analyse brain waves using various algorithms and give the level of attention and meditation of people as a ratio [7]. Therefore, we hypothesized that the novices and experts would present different psychophysiological responses during the aiming period. The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychophysiological differences of expert and novice rifle shooters during the aiming period using a mobile EEG device.
Material and Methods
Participants. A total of 34 male rifle shooters including 14 experts (age: 28.08±9.12 years, height: 176.12±4.24 cm, weight: 73.56±5.28 kg) and 20 novices (age: 21.08±3.12 years, height: 177.42±3.74 cm, and weight: 71.56±3.57 kg) participated in this study. The experts were chosen from a group of national athletes having experiences of at least four years and the novice shooters were chosen from beginners (2-8 months). The participants did not have any health problems. The current study was approved by the local ethical council and applied in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All the participants were informed of the objectives and risks of the study. All participants signed a voluntary participation form.
Research Design. Todeterminethe psychophysiological differences between expert and novice rifle shooters during the aiming period the shooters performed five shootings from a distance of 10m. The averages of each shooter's five shooting scores, values of attention and meditation, and heart rate between 5-sec before shooting and shooting moment were obtained.
Procedure. The study was performed in a standard indoor shooting area. Firstly, descriptive statistical data of the participants were obtained. The shooters performed a
total of 10 shots for familiarization. Furthermore, external viewers were placed in the competition area to create a competition environment. It was reported that athletes would be rewarded according to their performance.
Measurements.
Attention and meditation. A single-channel mobile and wearable electroencephalogram (EEG) device (MindWave®, NeuroSky, Inc., U.S.A.) was placed to the participants' head. Usability of detecting attention levels in an assessment exercise using NeuroSky portable EEG device has been demonstrated in many studies [18, 19, 20]. The EEG device was connected to the computer via Bluetooth to determine the attention and meditation levels of the participants. The attention level represents the intensity of the participant's mental focus. Meditation level shows the mental and calmness levels of the participants. The attention and meditation levels are scored between "0" and "100". "0" represents the lowest level, and "100" represents the highest level. "10.9" is the highest score, and "0" is the lowest score in rifle shooting. A mini software was developed in MATLAP program for the analysis of the raw data (attention and meditation) obtained from the Mobile EEG device. In this software, while a participant was shooting (shooting moment), a mark was placed between the data. Thus, the data of 5 seconds before the shot were analysed.
Heart rate. In order to determine the heart rate of the participants, the polar M400 (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland) was placed on the chest area of the participants. In order to synchronize the data, one of the researchers held the heart rate monitor behind the participant and when a participant shot, the investigator pressed the lap button of the monitor. The data obtained from the heart rate monitor were analysed by the Polar Protrainer5 software. The average heart rate of pre-5s of shooting was analysed.
Statistical Analysis.
SPSS 18.0 software was used for the statistical analysis of the data. Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to determine whether the data were distributed normally. Mann-Whitney U was used in order to detect the difference between the groups. A value of p<0.05 was taken as the significance value. Cohen's d values were calculated to determine effect sizes. Cohen's d values were classified as small (0.00 < d < 0.49), medium (0.50 < d < 0.79), and large effects (d > 0.8) [21].
Results
It is seen in Table 1 that shooting scores (10,02 ±0,49 vs. 7,6±2,86, p<0,01, effect size 1.179) and meditation level (71,50±21,05 vs. 52,93±20,54, p<0,05, effect size
Table 1. Comparison of the psychophysiological responses of the expert and novice rifle shooters during the aiming period.
Variables Expert Ort ±SS Novice Ort ±SS Effect size
Attention (level) 59.76±21.26 73.63±21.11* 0.655
Meditation (level) 71.50±21.05* 52.93±20.54 0.892
Heart rate (bpm) 98.67±7.12 105.34±12.12* 0.671
Shooting score (points) 10.02±0.49** 7.6±2.86 1.179
Notes: **: p<0.01, *: p<0.05 314
2019
0.892) are significantly higher in the expert shooters, whereas attention level (73,63±21,11 vs. 59,76±21,26, p<0,05, effect size 0.655), and heart rate (105,34±12,12 vs. 98,67±7,12 bpm, p<0,05, effect size 0.671) are found higher in the novice shooters.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychophysiological differences of expert and novice rifle shooters. At the end of the current study, it was seen that shooting scores and meditation level were significantly higher in expert shooters while attention level and heart rate were found higher in the novice shooters.
There are a limited number of studies in the literature examining psychophysiological factors in rifle shooters. In the present study, it was observed that the heart rate during the shooting was higher in the novice rifle shooters. Similar to the current study, Neumann & Thomas investigated heart rate differences of the elite and novice golf athletes during hitting the ball. They reported that the elite players had a lower heart rate when compared with novice players [16, 17]. Similarly et al reported that elite archers exhibited a lower heart rate when they were compared with novice archers during shooting [22]. Tremayne & Barry demonstrated that there was a slower reduction in heart rate levels prior to the shot in the experts pistol shooters when compared with the novice shooters [23]. It is well known that cognitive procedures increase or decrease heart rate during motor performance [24]. The reason of heart rate increment during shooting activity in novice shooter may be due to the turning of external attention (focusing on the effect of the movement) to internal attention (focusing on a person's body movement). It is well known that while external attention leads to a decrease in heart rate, inner attention leads to an increase in heart rate [25]. The best scores are managed during the external attention with a lower heart rate [26, 27]. Moreover, external attention facilitates the automatization of the movement [28]. With the focus on the inside, novice athletes might talk to themselves leading to an increased heart rate. Supporting this idea, in the current study, the meditation values of the novice shooters were found lower than the expert shooters [26]. This may mean that anxiety levels of the novice shooters are higher than the expert shooters. Moreover, it is well known that there is a relationship between elevation of anxiety and heart rate [29].
In the current study, the attention and meditation levels of the shooters were analysed with the mobile EEG measurement. It was determined that the novice shooters had higher attention levels than the expert shooters. In the literature, different results were found in the studies conducted to determine the attention differences according to the athletes' levels. Similar to the present study, Haufler et al. reported that elite shooters exhibited lower cortical activation during aiming in 15 elite and 21 novice shooters [30]. In another study, Deeny et al. reported that the elites exhibited lower alpha and beta values [8]. Hatfield et al. stated that the elite shooters had
lower activation of the cerebral cortex compared to the novice shooters [31]. In contrast to the current study, Lee (2009) stated that the elite archers had a greater attention level at the release of the arrow than the novice archers [7]. Del Percio et al. also reported high levels of alpha and beta bands which were directly related to attention and meditation in elite pistol shooters [32]. Fronso et al. stated in a review study that elite and novice shooters used different strategies during aiming, and especially the elites increased their attention during the shooting [27]. The most important reason for finding different results is the use of different protocols in the measurements. In the present study, the average of the psychophysiological values between 5-sec before shooting and shooting moment were obtained and analysed. However, other investigators found higher attention levels in experts just before release or shot [7, 32). The most important reason for lower attention in the expert shooters before shooting may be the long period of sports specific practice. The shooters can focus on the movement economically after a long period of repetition and adapt to sport specific movements because effective motor performance is characterized by the biomechanical and metabolic act of performing the movement economically [33, 34, 35, 36]. Serrien and Brown demonstrated a decline in the alpha and beta band EEG activities when the athletes became more familiar with a motor task [37]. Experienced shooters exhibit more precise focusing strategies and more effective visual screening models [38]. Unlike experts, novices focus more on related or irrelevant points (not selectively). This means more cognitive processing. However, as practice increases, irrelevant stimuli are eliminated and environmental stimuli and clues related to the task are processed [39].
Other data obtained in the mobile EEG measurements were that the meditation levels of the expert shooters were higher than the novice shooters. Similarly, Lee determined that the meditation levels of the expert archers were higher than the novices. Doppelmayr et al. found that only experienced gun shooters had a steady increase in theta power in the last three seconds prior to shooting [40]. Lange et al. determined a lower coherence in the alpha band when began to draw with the nondominant hand compared to the dominant hand [41]. This may be explained by the fact that expert shooters have more external attention and novice shooters have more internal attention. The higher heart rate and lower meditation level before the shot indicated that the novice shooters were under high stress and anxiety during shooting. However, in the expert shooters, emotions seemed more controllable under stress. It is well known that equilibrium performance is the most important factor affecting shooting performance [3, 4, 5]. Era et al. found that a change of less than 10% of postural control affected shooting score of elite rifle shooters [42]. Moreover et al. determined a significant association between low tension and the results in the test shootings (r = 0.42, P < 0.001) [43]. As a result, it is estimated that the increase in the internal attention of the novice shooters and the decrease
PSYCHOLOGY
medical-biological problems of physical training and sports
of the meditation level may affect the balance control, and, therefore, the shooting scores are affected negatively.
Conclusion
It was determined that the expert and novice rifle shooters presented different psychophysiological responses during the aiming period of shooting activities. According to these results, it was seen that while shooting scores and meditation level were significantly higher in the expert shooters, attention level, and heart rate were found higher in the novice shooters. It is suggested that the psychophysiological differences canbe useful to categorize shooters and to provide feedback in training because it is important to develop programs according to group levels, especially in the development of mental training
programs. In order to improve performance in novice shooters, focusing on psychological training (relaxation, and external attention) methods is recommended. In the future, studies can be carried out in rifle shooters together with the parameters of psychophysiological factors and balance control. Besides, it is determined that a mobile EEG device is an effective method for determining the mental status of athletes in sports specific activities. In the future, studies can be carried out in rifle shooters together with the parameters of psychophysiological and balance control.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
References
1. ISSF Rules Changes for 2018-2020. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Dec 18]. Available from: https://www.issf sports.org/ news.ashx?newsid=2955
2. Selva Y, Salleh AF, Joseph S. Influence of body weight distribution in shooting performance of 10 m air rifle shooters. 2015 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICoBE), Penang, Malaysia: IEEE; 2015, p. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoBE.2015.7235926.
3. Ihalainen S, Kuitunen S, Mononen K, Linnamo V. Determinants of elite-level air rifle shooting performance. Scand J Med Sci Spor, 2016; 26 (3): 266- 274. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12440
4. §im§ek D, Ertan H. Postural control and sport: postural sensor motor strategies and postural sway in different sport branches. Spormetre Beden Egitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2011; 9 (3): 81-90 . https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000203
5. Ball KA, Best RJ, Wrigley TV. Inter-and intra-individual analysis in elite sport: Pistol shooting. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 2003; 19(1): 28- 38. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.19.1.28
6. Yarrow K, Brown P, Krakauer JW. Inside the brain of an elite athlete: the neural processes that support high achievement in sports. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2009;10:585-96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2672
7. Lee K. Evaluation of attention and relaxation levels of archers in shooting process using brain wave signal analysis algorithms. Sci Sensitivity, 2009; 12 (3): 341-350.
8. Deeny SP, Hillman CH, Janelle MC, Hatfield BD. Cortico-cortical communication and superior performance in skilled marksmen: An EEG coherence analysis. J Sport Exercise Psy, 2003; 25: 188- 204. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.2.188
9. Abel JL, Larkin KT. Anticipation of performance among musicians: Physiological arousal, confidence, and state-anxiety. Psychol Music, 1990; 18 (2):171- 182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735690182006
10.Berka C, Levendowski DJ, Cvetinovic MM, Petrovic MM, Davis G, Lumicao MN. Olmstead R. Real-time analysis of EEG indexes of alertness, cognition, and memory acquired with a wireless EEG headset. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2004; 17(2): 151- 170. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1702_3
11.Wong SW, Chan RH, Mak JN. Spectral modulation of frontal EEG during motor skill acquisition: a mobile EEG study. InternationalJournalofPsychophysiology,2014;91(1):16-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/jijpsycho.2013.09.004
12.Park JL, Fairweather MM, Donaldson DI. Making the case for mobile cognition: EEG and sports performance. Neurosci Biobehav R, 2015; 52:117- 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.02.014
13.Vernon D, Egner T, Cooper N, Compton T, Neilands C, Sheri A, Gruzelier J. The effect of training distinct Neurofeedback protocols on aspect of cognitive performance. Int J Psychol, 2003; 47: 75- 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00091-0
14.Bertollo M, Tamburro G, Schinaia L, Chatel-Goldman J, Di Fronso S, Robazza C, Comani S. Hyperbrain features of team mental models within a juggling paradigm: a proof of concept. Peer J, 2016; 4: e2457 . https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2457
15.Lim CG, Lee TS, Guan C, Fung DSS, Zhao Y, Teng SSW. et al. A brain-computer interface based attention training program for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. PloS one, 2012; 7(10); e46692 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046692
16.Neumann DL. Thomas PR. The relationship between skill level and patterns in cardiac and respiratory activity during golf putting. Int J Psychophysiol, 2009; 72 (3): 276- 282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.01.001
17.Neumann DL. Thomas PR. Cardiac and respiratory activity and golf putting performance under attentional focus instructions. Psychol Sport Exerc, 2011; 12 (4): 451- 459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.02.002
18.Rebolledo-Mendez G. et al. Assessing neurosky's usability to detect attention levels in an assessment exercise. In: InternationalConference onHuman-Computerlnteraction. 2009july19-24.Berlin:Springer,Heidelberg,2009.P. 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02574-7_17
19.Ekandem JI, Davis TA, Alvarez I, James MT, Gilbert JE. Evaluating the ergonomics of BCI devices for research and experimentation. Ergonomics, 2012; 55(5): 592- 598. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.662527
20.Johnstone SJ, Blackman R, Bruggemann JM. EEG from a single-channel dry-sensor recording device. Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2012; 43(2): 112- 120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059411435857
21.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
22.Carillo AE. Autonomic nervous system modulation during an archery competition in novice and experienced adolescent archers. J Sport Sci, 2011; 29 (9): 913- 917. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.568514
2019
23.Tremayne P, Barry RJ. Elite pistol shooters: physiological patterning of best vs. worst shots. Int J Psychophysiol, 2001; 41 (1): 19- 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00175-6
24.Abernethy B, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, Kamp JVD, Jackson RC. Attentional Processes in Skill Learning and Expert Performance. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund RC, editors. Handbook of Sport Psychology, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012, p. 245-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch11
25.Radlo SJ, Steinberg GM, Singer RN, Barba DA, Melnikov A. The influence of an attentional focus strategy on alpha brain wave activity, heart rate and dart-throwing performance. Int J Sport Psychol. 2002; 33 (2): 205-217.
26.Vrbik A, Bene R, Vrbik I. Heart rate values and levels of attention and relaxation in expert archers during shooting. Hrvatski sportskomedicinski vjesnik, 2015; 30(1): 21-29.
27.Fronso SD, Robazza C, Bortoli L, Bertollo M. Performance optimization in sport: a psychophysiological approach. Motriz, 2017; 23 (4): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-6574201700040001
28.Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Medical education, 2010; 44 (1): 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x
29.Dishman RK, Nakamura Y, Garcia ME, Thompson RW, Dunn AL, Blair SN. Heart rate variability, trait anxiety, and perceived stress among physically fit men and women. Int J Psychophysiol, 2000; 37 (2): 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00085-4
30.Haufler AJ, Spalding TW, Santa Maria DL, Hatfield BD. Neuro-cognitive activity during a self-paced visuospatial task: comparative EEG profiles in marksmen and novice shooters. Biol Psychol, 2000; 53 (2-3): 131-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00047-8
31.Hatfield BD, Haufler AJ, Hung TM, Spalding TW. Electroencephalographic studies of skilled psychomotor performance. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2004; 21 (3): 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-200405000-00003
32.Del Percio C, Babiloni C, Bertollo M, Marzano N, Iacoboni M, Infarinato F, Comani S. Visuo-attentional and sensorimotor alpha rhythms are related to visuo-motor performance in
athletes. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009; 30 (11): 3527-3540. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20776
33.Daniels JT. A physiologist's view of running economy. Med Sci Sport Exer, 1985; 17: 332-338. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198506000-00006
34.Lay B, Sparrow W, Hughes K, O'Dwyer N. Practice effects on coordination and control, metabolic energy expenditure, and muscle activation. Hum Movement Sci, 2002; 21: 807-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(02)00166-5
35.Sparrow WA. The efficiency of skilled performance. J Motor Behav, 1983;15: 237-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1983.10735299
36.Sparrow WA. Energetics of human activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2000.
37.Serrien DJ, Brown P. The integration of cortical and behavioral dynamics during initial learning of a motor task. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003; 17: 1098-1104. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02534.x
38.Wrisberg CA. Levels of performance skill: From beginners to experts. Handbook of sport psychology, 2001; 2: 3-19.
39.LoganGD.Attentionandpreattentionintheoriesofautomaticity. The American Journal ofPsychology, 1992; 105 (2): 317-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423031
40.Doppelmayr M, Finkenzeller T, Sauseng P. Frontal midline theta in the pre-shot phase of rifle shooting: differences between experts and novices. Neuropsychologia, 2008; 46 (5):1463-1467. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.neuropsychologia.2007.12.026
41.Lange RK, Godde B, Braun C. EEG correlates of coordinate processing during intermanual transfer. Exp. Brain Res, 2004; 159: 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1942-x
42.Era P, Schroll M, Ytting H, Gause-Nilsson I, Heikkinen E, Steen B. Postural balance and its sensory - motor correlates in 75-year old men and women: A cross-national comparative study. J Gerontol: Medical Sciences, 1996; 51A: 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/51A.2.M53
43.Solberg EE, Berglund KA, Engen O, Ekeberg O, Loeb M. The effect of meditation on shooting performance. Brit J Sport Med, 1996; 30 (4): 342-346. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.30.4.342
Information about the authors:
Yildiz M.; (Corresponding author); http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-7775; [email protected]; The School of Physical Education and Sports Teaching, Afyon Kocatepe University; Afyonkarahisar 03200, Turkey.
Fidan U.; http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-017X; [email protected]; Faculty of Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Afyon Kocatepe University; Afyonkarahisar 03200, Turkey.
Cite this article as:
Yildiz M., Fidan U. The psychophysiological differences between expert and novice rifle shooters during the aiming period. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports, 2019;23(6):313-317. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2019.0606
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en).
Received: 19.06.2019
Accepted: 25.07.2019; Published: 30.09.2019
