CC BY
49SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS VOLUME 3 I ISSUE 1 I 2022 _ISSN: 2181-1601
THE PROBLEM OF DEFINITION IN LEXICOGRAPHY
Durdona Xaydarova Umayya Bonu Xalilova
Chirchik State Pedagogical Institute of Tashkent region
ABSTRACT
Lexicography has a common object of study with lexicology, both describe the vocabulary of a language. The essential difference between the two lies in the degree of systematisation and completeness each of them is able to achieve. Lexicology aims at systematisation revealing characteristic features of words.
Keywords: Dictionary theory, Lexicography, form, meaning, application and origin of dictionary units, written linguistics.
Lexicography, the theory and practice of compiling dictionaries, is an important field of study. Lexicography is closely connected with lexicology, both dealing with the same problems - the form, meaning, usage and origin of vocabulary units - and making use of each other's achievements. On the one hand, the enormous raw material collected in dictionaries is widely used by linguists in their research. On the other hand, the principles of dictionary-making are always based on linguistic fundamentals, and each individual entry is made up in accordance with the current knowledge and findings of scholars in the various fields of language study. The compiler's approach to various lexicological problems (such as homonymy, idiomatic units, etc.) always finds reflection in the selection and arrangement of the material.
The most important problems of lexicography are connected with:
1) the selection of lexical units for inclusion;
2) the arrangement of the selected lexical units;
3) the setting of the entry;
4) the selection and arrangement of word-meanings;
5) the definition of meanings;
6) the illustrative material.
The choice of lexical units for inclusion is the first problem the lexicographer faces. It is necessary to decide: a) what types of lexical units will be chosen for the inclusion; b) the number of these items; c) what to select and what to leave out in the dictionary; d) which form of the language, spoken or written or both, the dictionary is to reflect; e) whether the dictionary should contain obsolete units, technical terms, dialectisms, colloquialisms, and some others.
The choice among different possible answers depends upon the type to which the dictionary will belong, the aim the compilers pursue, the prospective user of the dictionary, the size of the dictionary, the linguistic concepts of the dictionary-makers
SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS
VOLUME 3 I ISSUE 1 I 2022 ISSN: 2181-1601
and some other considerations. The Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (second edition. 1987), for example, aims to provide advanced students and teachers of English with appropriate information on the core vocabulary of contemporary international English.
The units for inclusion may be drawn either from other dictionaries or/and from some reading matter or/and from the spoken discourse. For example, in the New Oxford Dictionary of English the extensive use has been made of the British National Corpus. (Corpus is a collection of language data brought together for linguistic analysis).
There are two modes of presentation of entries, the alphabetical order and the cluster-type, i.e. when the units entered are arranged in nests, based on this or that principle. For example, in synonym-books words are arranged in synonymic sets and its dominant member serves as the head-word of the entry.
Entries may be grouped in families of words of the same root as in case of, for example, some general explanatory and translation dictionaries. The basic units are given as main entries that appear in alphabetical order while the derivatives and the phrases which the word enters are given either as subentries or in the same entry as run-ons that are also alphabetized. The difference between subentries and run-ons is that the former do include definitions and usage labels, whereas run-on words are not defined as their meanings are clear from the main entry.
The most complicated type of entry is that found in general explanatory dictionaries of the synchronic type. In such dictionaries the entry usually presents the following data: accepted spelling and pronunciation; grammatical characteristics including the indication of the part of speech of each entry word, whether nouns are countable or uncountable, the transitivity/intransitivity of verbs and irregular grammatical forms; definitions of meaning; modern currency; illustrative examples; derivatives; phraseology; etymology; sometimes synonyms and antonyms.
The compilers of a dictionary of the same type may choose a different setting of a typical entry: they may omit some of the items or add some others, choose a different order of their arrangement or a different mode of presenting the same information.
There are at least three different ways in which the word meanings are arranged: a) in the historical order, i.e. in the sequence of their historical development; b) in the empirical or actual order, i.e. in conformity with their frequency of use, i.e. with the most common meaning first; c) in the logical order, i.e. according to their logical connection.
In different dictionaries the problem of arrangement is solved differently. For example, the general principle on which meanings in the New Oxford Dictionary of English are organized is that each word has at least one core meaning, to which a number of submeanings can be attached. Core meanings, as the authors of the dictionary point out, represent typical, central uses of the word in question in modern Standard
SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS VOLUME 3 I ISSUE 1 I 2022 _ISSN: 2181-1601
English. It is the meaning accepted by native speakers as the one that is most established as literal and central.
In many dictionaries meanings are generally organized by frequency of use, but sometimes the primary meaning comes first if this is considered essential to a correct understanding of derived meanings.
Illustrative examples can be drawn from different sources, e.g. literature classical or contemporary, or can be constructed by the compilers themselves. For example, in the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English illustrative examples are based on analysis of the authentic language in the Longman Corpus Network.
Some dictionaries indicate the author, the work, the page, verse, or line, and the precise date of the publication, some indicate only the author to give at least basic orientation about the time when the word occurs.
REFERENCES
1. Azizhojaeva N.N. Teacher Training Technology. -T .: Tashkent, 2000. - 52 p.
2. Goziev Yo.Yo. "General Psychology" Volume 1-2. Tashkent-2002.
3. Yuldashev J. New pedagogical technology: directions, problems, solutions. Public Education, 1999, No. 4, pp. 4-11.
4. Mahmudov M. The system of didactic design of educational materials. «Pedagogical skills», 2002, issue 3, pages 3-11.
5. Mahmudov M. Designing learning outcomes. // «Pedagogical skills», 2003, issue 1, pages 8-10.
6. Nishonova Z.T. High school psychology. Tashkent, 2003.
