Научная статья на тему 'The peculiar features of fictional texts'

The peculiar features of fictional texts Текст научной статьи по специальности «Языкознание и литературоведение»

CC BY
950
131
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
FICTIONAL TEXT / IMAGINARY WORLD / VERBAL EXPLICATIONS / EVALUATION AND EMOTIVENESS / ANTHROPOCENTRIC CHARACTER / LINGUISTIC PERSONALITY

Аннотация научной статьи по языкознанию и литературоведению, автор научной работы — Adilova Charos Alim Qizi

The following article states some issues relating to linguistics. Precisely to the field of linguistics which deals with the texts. The author claims that fictional text is inseparable element of stylistics. And while reading this or that text having literary character it is important to reflect upon the imaginary world of the author. So in this article the author clearly expresses some peculiar features of the above mentioned activity.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «The peculiar features of fictional texts»

education of "schoolchildren a positive attitude to a foreign language, the culture of the people who speak this language [1, p. 63]. Education by means of a foreign language presupposes knowledge of the culture, history, realities and traditions of the country of the studied language. "The appeal to the problem of studying language and culture is not accidental at the same time, since it allows to successfully combine elements of regional studies with linguistic phenomena, which act not only as a means of communication, but also as a way of acquainting learners with a new reality for them. The theories of "Linguistic culture" emphasize that this direction, combines, on one hand, language training, and on the other - gives certain information about the country of the language being studied. Since the main object is not the country, but the background knowledge of native speakers, in the generalized form of their culture, it would be correct to talk about "cultural studies". However, the term "Linguo-countrystudy" is already firmly established in the practice of teaching foreign languages and, perhaps, it should be left. However, it is necessary to clearly represent the difference between country study and linguistic studies. If country study is a social discipline, in which language should not be taught, then linguistic culture is a philological where discipline is largely taught not separately as an object, but in classes on semantics of the language units.

References

1. Gumboldt V.F. Izbranni'e trudi' po yazi'koznaniyu - OAO Izdatelskaya gruppa «Progress, 2000. C. 5.

2. Bozorova L.B. Sovremenno'e informatsionno'e texnologii v protsesse formirovaniya leksicheskix navo'kov na urokax angliyskogo yazo'ka // Nauka, obrazovanie i kultura». № 4 (19), 2017. S. 40.

3. Mamatkulova B.R. Kontsept «ognya» i protsess ego izucheniya v istorii // Nauka i obrazovanie segodnya. № 5 (16), 2017. S. 39.

4. Bazarova L.B. Learning foreign language through reading // Nauka i obrazovanie segodnya. № 5 (16), 2017. S. 40.

5. Rahmonova K.T. Self study is a discovery of effective language learning strategy // Nauka i obrazovanie segodnya. № 5 (16), 2017. S. 42.

THE PECULIAR FEATURES OF FICTIONAL TEXTS Adilova Ch.A.

Adilova Charos Alim qizi - English Language Teacher, SECONDARY SCHOOL № 11, SYRDARYA, REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN

Abstract: the following article states some issues relating to linguistics. Precisely to the field of linguistics which deals with the texts. The author claims that fictional text is inseparable element of stylistics. And while reading this or that text having literary character it is important to reflect upon the imaginary world of the author. So in this article the author clearly expresses some peculiar features of the above mentioned activity.

Keywords: fictional text, imaginary world, verbal explications, evaluation and emotiveness, anthropocentric character, linguistic personality.

UDC 81

The fictional text has always been one of the vital issues of stylistics. There are many scholars and famous philologists such as V.V. Vinogradov, V.V. Vinokur, I.R. Halperin, and R. Jacobson who conducted researches on the basis of fictional texts. According to D.U. Ashurova the fictional text is a specific type of communication characterized by the primary communicative activity of the author and the secondary communicative activity of the reader.

The main aim of the fictional text is to reflect the imaginary world of the author. The most distinguishing feature of the literary text is its aesthetic function which presupposes the impact on the reader both by the linguistic form of the text and its conceptual content. Aesthetics of the text is closely related to the categories of imagery, evaluation and emotiveness, therefore the analysis of these categories and their verbal explications in the text arc of cultural concern of text theory.

Anthropocentric character is another most essential property of the literary text. The principle of anthropocentrism is a vital problem of modern linguistics which shows that the study of language is closely related to human being. This issue was widely discussed in the works by V.V. Vinogradov,

U.N. Karaulov, V.A. Maslova and others. Consequently, the anthropocentric perspective of the literary text requires the investigation of «linguistic personality». Linguistic personality in the fictional text is presented in two forms: the author's image and that of the personage.

One of the important peculiarities of literary text is its multilayered and multidimensional structure. There are different approaches to this problem. According to Turayeva's approach the layers can be classified into two types: surface and deep. The surface layer is interpreted as a verbal layer dealing with linguistic forms which include phonetic, morphological, lexical and syntactical levels. The deep layer contains conceptual information and puts forward the author's pragmatic intentions which reveal his outlook and his individual world picture containing moral values and aesthetic views of the author. According to Z.L. Khovanovskaya the layers are classified into: aesthetic, compositional and linguistic. M.P. Brandes highlights such levels as compositional, emotional and psychological. Besides, some scholars [1, p. 52] suggest the pragmatic level of the text which can be interpreted as the ability to produce an aesthetic effect on the reader. Some scholars differentiate the stylistic level of the text [2, p. 88]. The analysis of the stylistic level deals with:

1. Stylistic categories: emotiveness, implicitness, intertextuality, modality and imagery;

2. Stylistic devices and expressive means;

3. Foregrounding expressed by convergence of stylistic devices, key words, verbal signs of intertextuality, quotations and etc.;

4. Textual associative links which are based on the arrangement of the words and their meanings reflected in the context.

In addition, according to some scholars there is the cultural level of the fictional text [1.p.19]. The cultural level reflects individual and national cultural values, knowledge about historical, political, social, religious notions and events. Cultural information is presented in the language by the means of linguistic forms: words, word combinations, phraseological units, text fragments.

Some scholars outline the cognitive level of the fictional text. The cognitive level is closely related with aesthetic function of the text and represents an individual world picture reflecting the author's world perception and aesthetic credo.

Literary text as a multilayered structure in its interpretation considered in integrity of its linguistic and extra linguistic factors, the surface and deep layers of the text, its stylistic, communicative, pragmatic, cultural, cognitive and aesthetic aspects.

In conclusion, it should be stressed the literary text is a specific type of communication characterized by: a) anthropocentric character; b) aesthetic values and cultural entity, c) a complex multidimensional structure.

References

1. AshurovaD.U. Text linguistics-Tashkent: Tafakkur qanoti, 2012. C. 85-98.

2. Jacobson R. Linguistics and Poetics // Style and Language, 1960. C. 273.

3. Rashidov A.S. Interpretation and its peculiar features in communication // Nauchno'y jurnal. № 5 (18), 2017. C. 71.

4. Mamatkulova B.R. Kontsept «ognya» i protsess ego izucheniya v istorii // Nauka i obrazovanie segodnya. № 5 (16), 2017. Sr. 39.

5. Bаzаrova L.B. Learning foreign language through reading // Nauka i obrazovanie segodnya. № 5 (16), 2017. S. 40.

ОБРАЗ ДУРАКА В КАЛМЫЦКОЙ БЫТОВОЙ СКАЗКЕ Севтинова А.В.

Севтинова Айса Васильевна — магистрант, направление: фольклористика и мифология, Институт Калмыцкой филологии и востоковедения Калмыцкий государственный университет, г. Элиста

Аннотация: в статье на примере калмыцкой бытовой сказки о глупом юноше раскрывается образ дурака-удачника.

Ключевые слова: фольклор, бытовая сказка, образ.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.