CC BY
135
® DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-6-6
Z
2 The mediating role of price sensitivity
I in the effect of trust and loyalty to luxury brands
| on the brand preference
< Esra Ozkan Pir1, Evrim Derinozlu
m
1 Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey
Abstract. In the age of consumption, customers prefer high-quality and exclusively designed luxury brands. This trend is based on a variety of reasons, such as the manifestation of status and wealth, as well as positive emotions and symbolic power created by these brands. The study aims to examine the variables of trust and loyalty to luxury brands, brand preference and price sensitivity, and to determine whether there is a meaningful relationship between these variables. If there is, to investigate the mediating role of price sensitivity in the effect of consumer trust and loyalty to luxury brands on brand preference. The methodological framework of the research includes planned behaviour theory to predict customers' intentions and behaviours towards luxury brands. The information base of the research includes data from the online survey of 563 respondents from Turkey. Among the main research methods applied in the study are descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. SPSS 22.0 and AMOS software, as well as the principles of structural equation modeling are used to analyze the data. In the research, we could not determine the mediating role of price sensitivity in the effect of brand trust and loyalty on brand preference. A statistically significant, positive, and healthy relationship exists between brand trust and brand loyalty and brand preference. The study shows that the effect of price sensitivity and brand trust on brand preference is weak. The theoretical and practical importance of the study is to support companies in developing successful luxury branding strategies and to contribute to the luxury brand literature.
Keywords: brand trust; brand loyalty; brand preference; price sensitivity; luxury brand. JEL Classification: M31, E21, D11 Paper submitted: October 8, 2020
For citation: Ozkan Pir E., Derinozlu E. (2020). The mediating role of price sensitivity in the effect of trust and loyalty to luxury brands on the brand preference. Upravlenets - The Manager, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 70-84. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-6-6.
INTRODUCTION
One of the primary objectives of businesses is to become a trusted brand in an increasingly competitive environment [Kalyoncuoglu, 2017]. Trust is critical for attitudes and behaviors towards any company or seller and is essential during shopping [Habibi, Laroche, Richard, 2014]. The stable relationship between the brand and the consumer is gradually transformed into brand trust [Del-gado-Ballester, Munuera-Aleman, 2001, 2005]. Strong brands mean trusted brands, which, in turn, bring loyal customers [£abuk, Demirci-Orel, 2008]. This relationship is primarily consistent with the goals of luxury products. Moreover, the concept of trust reduces the possibility of risk and uncertainty. Thus, customers are more likely to choose a brand they trust [Power, Whelan, Davies, 2008].
Brand trust is a dominant mediating factor in customer behavior before and after product purchases [Liu et al., 2012]. This is one of the most influential factors in creating an emotional bond between the consumer and the brand. Brand loyalty is revealed by not abandoning the brand after the emotional bond is formed, and by purchasing the same brand repeatedly [£e$en-Saglam, Saglam, 2016].
According to Brodie et al. [2011], the shared values created between consumers and a particular brand lay the foundations of consumer-brand loyalty. Another factor in ensuring brand loyalty is brand trust. It is built when
brands meet consumer expectations, such as quality and after-sales service. Therefore, customers who trust the brand want to repurchase it by ruling out other alternatives and without wasting time. This indicates that trust is one of the critical factors affecting brand loyalty [Sahin, Gultekin, 2017].
Relatively higher costs incurred in acquiring new customers compared with retaining the existing ones causes brands to focus on establishing loyalty among the existing consumers [Delgado-Ballester, Munuera-Aleman, 2001].
One of the strengths of brand marketing is brand preference, where consumers are loyal to a particular brand. One of the critical issues in branding strategies is how to create and maintain consumer brand preferences. However, marketers in the industry experience difficulties in changing customers' preferences [Kao, 2019]. According to Ebrahim [2013], the strength of any brand is its success in gaining consumer preferences and establishing long-term relationships. Consumer brand preference is an essential step in understanding buyer choice behavior and has always been of interest to marketers. Brand preferences reveal the qualities of the brand, strengthen its position, and increase its market share. It also creates a critical input in developing a company's successful brand-
ing strategy and provides insight into product development. For luxury goods, being the preferred brand is an essential indicator of strength.
Since the consumer is willing to buy branded products despite their high price, it is vital to examine brand loyalty's effect on price sensitivity [Phau, Cheong, 2009]. Consumers who are loyal to any brand show less sensitivity to products' prices of the relevant brand [Dowling, Uncles, 1997]. Thus, the research examines the mediating role of price sensitivity in the effect of trust and loyalty to luxury brands on brand preference. In the research, we hypothesize that the effect of brand trust and brand loyalty on brand preferences is strong and price sensitivity has a mediating effect on this relationship.
The study aims to clarify if price sensitivity is an important factor in the effects of brand trust and loyalty on the brand preference. The main objective of the research is explore the mediating role of price sensitivity in the effect of trust and loyalty to luxury brands on brand preference.
BRANDTRUST
In the dictionary of the Turkish Language Association (TDK)1, the concept of trust is defined as "believing without any fear, hesitation and suspicion and a feeling of attachment, confidence" and "courage and boldness", which appears in all fields and scientific works. The concept of trust, which is one of the most effective fundamental factors in all sorts of decisions of societies, is discussed and explained in different disciplines such as Management, Economics, Psychology, Sociology, Law, and Marketing. In the initial studies on trust, researchers considered this phenomenon as a personality trait [Rawlins, 2007]. The concept of trust has a structure, including ethical values such as sincerity, authenticity, integrity, virtue, and honor [Solomon, Flores, 2001]. Trust can also be defined as the conscious consistency that includes sincerity, truth, honesty, and virtue in the relationships between individuals and institutions [Gokalp, 2003]. This term is briefly interpreted as "the perceived honesty, competency and helpfulness of a trust goal" [Doney, Cannon, 1997; Coulter, Coulter, 2002]. Trust is a critical factor in building relationships between consumers and companies [Mabkhot, Shaari, Salleh, 2017].
According to Brumley [2002], brand trust is "the psychological state of repeat purchasing tendency based on the positive expectations regarding the counterparty's intentions and behaviors". Chaudhuri and Holbrook [2001] defined brand trust as "the willingness of consumers to believe in the brand's ability to fulfill its intended function." A person feels confident once an event he has been waiting for finally happens. Trust is the willingness to believe the other side in the face of risk [Lau, Lee, 1999].
Brand quality is an indicator of brand reliability. If consumers trust the brand, they believe it is of high quality
1Türk Dil Kurumu (TDK). Available at: www.tdk.gov.tr.
[Azizi, 2014]. Brand trust is assumed to be the leading ° indicator of brand value [Rosenbloom, Haefner, 2009]. d Therefore, it is a crucial concept for luxury brands. I
Lau and Lee [1999] define brand trust as "the trust of | the customer in the existing brand in the face of any risk." £ Accordingly, brand trust embraces factors, such as the § brand predictability, brand adequacy, brand reputation, g customer appreciation of the brand, and trust in the busi- x ness. H
Brand trust is a prominent phenomenon, especially in 5 the circumstances such as uncertainty or fear of oppor- § tunism [Laroche et al., 2012]. Chaudhuri and Holbrook £ [2001] state that customers can rely on the relevant brand to reduce uncertainty in an environment, where customers feel incredibly vulnerable.
Trust is one of the critical factors that influence the decisions of consumers. Trust implies believing in a brand before purchasing any product or service [Swaen, Chumpitaz, 2008]. Brand trust can demolish the wall of concern and distance for consumers to buy products and become permanent customers [Pavlou, 2003]. Reast [2005] revealed that brand trust depends on the satisfaction with the performance of a particular product offered by the brand. The level of satisfaction created by meeting consumer expectations, wishes, and needs affects brand loyalty [Haciefendioglu, 2014].
Brand reputation and awareness, i.e. having knowledge about the brand before using it, increases consumers' belief in the brand and builds trust [Dawar, 1996]. Consumers will consider gravitating towards other products risky, and thus, continue to prefer the products they are already confident about [Gurbuz, Dogan, 2013]. Lin and Lee [2012] note that familiarity, which enables stores to be recognized and remembered, decreases risk perception and increases brand trust. Adamson et al. [2003] show that trust is positively associated with customer loyalty. Al-Hawari [2011] also reveals that customer trust is linked to customer loyalty. Brand trust has also been the subject of repeat purchasing behavior [Harris, Goode, 2004].
Brand trust implies that consumers have positive expectations about the brand and believe in it. This suggests that brand trust plays a facilitating role in the purchasing process [Luk, Yip, 2008]. Thanks to brand trust, customers believe that the brand will show the expected performance. Products and services offered by the brand should meet or even exceed consumers' expectations to ensure brand trust [Orzan et al., 2016]. Brand character reflects the extent to which brands appeal to the lifestyle and personality of customers. Brands that supposedly have a distinctive character are likely to be preferred over those without any character [Saaksjarvi, Samiee, 2007]. Consumers who rely on a brand are more willing to stay loyal to it, buy new products in new categories, and pay more money for it [Mabkhot, Shaari, Salleh, 2017]. After building brand trust, brand loyalty will be easier to create.
2 Brand trust, which holds an important place for busi-
3 nesses, is a concept that is frequently examined in the sci-£ entific literature. Brand trust positively affects brand loy-| alty [Delgado-Ballester, Munuera-Aleman, 2001; Bennur, £ Jin, 2017], brand commitment [Viktoria-Rampl, Kenning, ¡5 2014; Delgado-Ballester, Munuera-Aleman, 2001; Chaud-< huri, Holbrook, 2001; Matzler, Bidmon, Grabner-Krauter, g 2006; Orzan et al., 2016; Mishra, Kesharwani, Das, 2016;
Upamannyu, Bhakar, Gupta, 2015; Bennur, Jin, 2017], intention to buy [Chaudhuri, Holbrook, 2001; Halim, 2006] and purchasing behavior [Chatterjee, Chaudhuri, 2005; Viktoria-Rampl, Kenning, 2014].
BRAND LOYALTY
Loyalty is the state of adherence to a brand that causes a customer to prefer that brand repeatedly since it provides various benefits [Swystun, 2007]. Brand loyalty is defined as "a strong commitment that a product or service will be consistently repurchased or consumed again and again" [Oliver, 1999]. Wood [2004] defines brand loyalty as "a behavioral tendency shown by decision-making units toward a brand for a long time as a function of the psychological process among one or multiple brands." According to Bowden [2009], brand loyalty is "a psychological process that involves increasing consumers' loyalty to a brand."
The first step for any consumer to build brand loyalty is to be aware of the relevant brand and product [Ba§, 2015]. The most distinctive feature of strong brands is that they create loyal customers [Uztug, 2002]. Consumer loyalty raises the quality of consumer-brand relationships [Gummerus et al., 2012]. Trust and loyalty should be built so that brands can transform their interactions with consumers into a relationship [Morgan, Hunt, 1994]. Otherwise, it is not possible to establish a long-term and robust relationship.
In the marketing literature, customer loyalty is conceptualized as a triple structure consisting of emotional, normative, and calculable commitment [Allen, Meyer, 1990]. Hollebeek, Glynn and Brodie [2014] explain brand loyalty through three components: emotional, cognitive, and behavioral. Keiningham et al. [2015] state that brand loyalty has five components: emotional commitment, normative commitment, economic commitment, forced commitment, and habitual commitment.
Customers with strong brand loyalty reach brands through social media channels, express their opinions, and play a guiding role with their positive or negative opinions [Buran, Kocak, 2019]. Consumers' loyalty will also lead to the brand [Qnar, 2019]. They help companies to create brand value by notifying their needs and making suggestions [Sashi, 2012].
Brand loyalty leads consumers to a high level of brand commitment [Libai, 2011]. Customers should have positive attitudes towards a brand rather than buy products from that brand again to build brand loyalty [Schoen-
bachler, Gordon, Aurand, 2004]. Even if consumers whose expectations are met and loyal customers do not repurchase products, they convey their positive opinions to people around them and, thus, bring new customers to the brand [Atilgan, Ko$, 2019]. Brand loyalty includes consumers' interactive experiences with the brand and increases its value [Brodie et al., 2011].
Consumer loyalty to the brand also expresses brand value. Although the brand is considered an asset, the main asset is loyalty rather than the brand itself [Travis, 2000]. Brand loyalty is closely related to new earnings that are gained and maintained by an enterprise. Increasing consumer loyalty means increasing the business profitability rate [Leverin, Liljander, 2006].
PRICE SENSITIVITY
Zeithaml [1988] defines price as "the thing that is given up or sacrificed to own a product." Price represents the amount of money consumers have to pay when purchasing products and services [Uslu, Huseynli, 2018]. Price sensitivity is interpreted as "the awareness of consumers about the price level of the product and service at the time of purchase" [Morris, Joyce, 1988]. Al-Mamun and Robel [2014] explained the price sensitivity as "a variable that shows individual differences defining how consumers react to changes in the price levels." Price-sensitive consumers seek goods and services at lower prices, and their willingness to buy decreases as prices rise [Goldsmith et al., 2005].
Consumers have become more conscious and started to get more detailed information when purchasing a product or service [Özdemir, Ko^ak, 2012]. Price is an important indicator of product quality perceived by consumers. Consumers often believe that products at higher price are of higher quality. Each consumer has different price ratings [McGowan, Sternquist, 1998]. Consumers think that they can show their prestige and status to other people by purchasing expensive products [Völckner, 2008]. In their view, luxury brands meet all these expectations [Derinözlü, 2020].
Consumers recognize price changes in the products they frequently buy more easily [Atilgan, 2014]. Brands expect consumers to be willing to pay more to purchase their products, which consumers regard as an indicator of their status. Consumers prefer brands they are willing to buy, ignoring the high prices [Can, 2019]. Brands also get an advantage in price competition thanks to consumers who are less sensitive to price [Dekimpe et al., 1997]. Flynn, Goldsmith and Kim [2000] report a negative correlation between brand loyalty and price sensitivity in the clothing industry. In the study on university students, Lau et al. [2006] report that consumers' sensitivity with high brand loyalty to prices is low.
Each consumer group may have a different price perception. Although some consumer groups perceive high-priced products as unnecessary, other consumer groups
may recognize such products as offering quality. Therefore, for different market segments different strategies should be developed [Fettahlioglu, Birin-Atilgan, Qldir, 2019].
BRAND PREFERENCE
Brand preference is consumers' behavior to choose a brand among competitors depending on their habits or experience [Aktuglu, Temel 2006]. Customers create brand preferences to reduce the purchasing decision process [Hwang, Chihyung, 2013]. Experience created by brands for their consumers have a determining effect on individual brand preferences [Ulker-Demirel, Yildiz, 2015]. Brand strength is evident in its success in gaining consumer preferences and building long-term relationships [Ebrahim, 2013]. Previous research has suggested that brand preference increases as the importance of perceived product quality rises [Chomvilailuk, Butcher, 2010]. According to Wang [2015], brand preference is regarded as consumers' belief that a brand is preferred over other similar brands. As Ebrahim et al. [2016] put it, brand preference also considers rational and irrational aspects of consumer behavior. Brand preference refers to the tendency to choose a specific product brand from among brands with similar products, and product information affects the perception of quality [Wang, 2013]. Products of high quality always have a positive place in consumers' minds [Zia, Sohail, 2016]. Consumers prefer the brand that responds to their needs and desires best by comparing the products they want to buy with other brands in their luxury brand preferences.
Several empirical studies support the positive relationship between brand value structures and brand preference. Customer-based brand equity is considered a precondition for brand preference, which affects consumers' intention to buy. Therefore, brand value structures are likely to affect brand preference [Tolba, 2011].
It is a well-known fact how important brand trust and brand loyalty are for luxury brands. Brand trust is built before buying any product from a luxury label. In addition, trusting the luxury brand is very important for consumers' brand choice. Customers feel loyalty to the brands they trust. Therefore, loyalty occurs after trust. If consumers' expectations are met by brands, loyalty will continue and enhance the value of the brand. Prices for luxury products are higher than for non-luxury ones. Consumers have different price ratings in their minds. Some people do not buy anything without doing price research. Some are less price sensitive. They mostly buy luxury products regardless of the price. Therefore, in this study, we investigate the role of brand trust and brand loyalty in luxury brand preference and the mediating role of price sensitivity.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research model and hypotheses. The research model was created after the literature review (Fig. 1). The models and hypotheses suitable for the study are listed below.
о
M
о
M
et
Fig. 1. Research model Рис. 1. Логическая модель исследования
H1 = Brand trust has a positive effect on brand loyalty.
H2 = Brand trust has a positive effect on price sensitivity.
H3 = Brand loyalty has a positive effect on price sensitivity.
H4 = Brand trust has a positive effect on brand preference.
H5 = Brand loyalty has a positive effect on brand preference.
H6 = Price sensitivity has a positive effect on brand preference.
H7 = Price sensitivity has a mediating role in the effect of brand trust on brand preference.
H8 = Price sensitivity has a mediating role in the effect of brand loyalty on brand preference.
Sampling, Data Collection and Evaluation Technique. The research population is all consumers whose brand preferences include luxury brands in Turkey. According to the Turkish Statistical Institute data, the Turkish population has been 83,154,997 as of 2019. In the study, convenience sampling was preferred due to time and cost constraints. The sample size should have a 95 % confidence level, and a 5 % margin of error is 384 [Saunders, Lewis, Thornhill, 2000]. The data used in the research were obtained via an online survey, and the sampling comprised 563 individuals living in various provinces of Turkey.
In the study, Delgado-Ballester's [2002] 8-dimensional scale was used to measure brand trust; Hollebeek, Glynn and Brodie's [2014] 10-statement scale was used to measure brand loyalty. Wakefield and Inman's [2003] 3-state-ment scale was employed to measure price sensitivity, and finally, four statements out of the 5-statement scale of Chang and Liu [2009] were used to measure brand preference. The scales used in the study, the number of statements, and their sources are given in Table 1.
Table 1 - Research variables and the corresponding scales Таблица 1 - Переменные исследования и соответствующие им шкалы измерения
Scales Number of Statements Source
Brand Trust 8 Delgado-Ballester (2002)
Brand Loyalty 10 Hollebeek, Glynn and Brodie (2014)
Price Sensitivity 3 Wakefield and Inman (2003)
Brand Preference 4 Chang and Liu (2009)
£
2 As shown in Table 1, a total of 25 statements were
3 created in our study, including eight statements on the £ brand trust scale, ten on the brand loyalty scale, three on | the price sensitivity scale, and finally, four on the brand £ preference scale.
£ A 5-point Likert scale was used for the statements in | the survey. Data were collected with a 30-question survey, Is including demographic questions.
Descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation) were used to evaluate the scales
and personal information scores. In addition, the relationships of the values obtained from the scales were assessed with Structural Equation Modeling (Path Analysis). Analyses were carried out with SPSS 22.0 and AMOS software. The significance level was set to p < 0.05.
Measures. To measure the scales' internal consistency, reliability analysis was conducted, whereas an explanatory factor analysis was performed to test the validity. The factor loadings and Cronbach's Alpha coefficients of the scales are shown in Table 2.
Table 2 - Reliability and factor analysis for variables Таблица 2 - Показатели надежности теста и результаты факторного анализа переменных
Brand Trust a Factor Mean Standard Dev.
Luxury brands meet my expectations .918 .708 3.45 .85
Luxury brands are reliable .762
Luxury brands never disappoint me .762
Luxury brands guarantee customer satisfaction .807
I think luxury brands are honest and sincere in solving my problems .863
I believe that luxury brands will solve my problems .865
Luxury brands make every effort to satisfy their customers .787
Luxury brands will compensate me in an optimum way if I experience any problem with their products .829
KMO = .906 Bartlett's test value = 3 042.404
Brand Loyalty a Factor Mean Standard Dev.
Using luxury brand products leads me to think more about luxury brands .940 .785 3.29 .95
If I own any product of a luxury brand, I am more interested in that brand .754
Using luxury brand products leads me to learn about luxury brands .769
Using luxury brand products makes me feel optimistic .854
Using luxury brand products makes me happy .842
I feel great when I use luxury brand products .867
Using luxury brand products makes me proud .804
I spend more time in stores or websites of luxury brands compared to other brands .798
Whenever I buy something, it is usually a luxury brand product .807
I mostly prefer luxury brands, no matter what I buy .801
KMO = .916 Bartlett's test value = 4 988.398
Price Sensitivity a Factor Mean Standard Dev.
I make extra effort to find the lower price of a product .808 .846 4.07 .77
If I can buy a product for a lower price, I can change what I am planning to buy .847
I am sensitive to price differences while shopping .878
KMO = .713 Bartlett's test value = 596.583
Brand Preference a Factor Mean Standard Dev.
I consider buying luxury brands before other brands .911 .834 2.88 1.08
I prefer luxury brand products, although products offered by other brands have better features .899
I prefer to buy luxury brands even though other brands give better offers (Discounts, Installments, etc.) .907
I prefer to buy luxury brand products in my future purchases .914
KMO = .821 Bartlett's test value = 1 602.548
Descriptive statistics for the variables of brand trust, °
brand loyalty, price sensitivity and brand preference in d
the study are given in Table 4. I
When Table 4, which includes the mean scores of the |
participants' answers, is analyzed, the mean of the brand £
trust variable is 3.45, and brand loyalty is 3.29. The mean §
price sensitivity variable is 4.07, and that of the brand, g
preference is 2.88. x The Structural Equation Modeling was used to exam- H
ine the model created to determine the mediating effect 5
of price sensitivity on trust and loyalty to luxury brands H on brand preference. The model created to test the re- £ search hypotheses is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Testing research hypotheses using structural equation modeling Рис. 2. Модель для проверки выдвинутых гипотез с использованием структурных уравнений
As shown in Table 3, 64.83 % of respondents are fe- Whether the collected data fit or not is determined male (N = 365) and 35.16 % are male (N = 198). 53.64 % by evaluating various fit indices [Meydan, §e§en, 2015]. are married (N = 302), 46.36 % are single (N = 261). 89.52 To determine the fit of the created model with the data % are between the ages of 18-45 (N = 504). 51.15 % of covariance matrix, the fit values were examined. The fit respondents are undergraduate (N = 288). 26.11 % (N = indices obtained are given in Table 5. 147) do not have any regular income.
Table 4 - Descriptive statistics of the scales Таблица 4 - Описательная статистика переменных с учетом шкал
FINDINGS
The demographic characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 - Demographic characteristics of the sample Таблица 3 - Социально-демографические характеристики
участников исследования
Characteristics Frequency Percentage, %
1. Gender Female 365 64.83
Male 198 35.17
2. Marital status Married 302 53.64
Single 261 46.36
3. Age 18-25 156 27.71
26-35 181 32.15
36-45 167 29.66
46-55 44 7.82
56 and over 15 2.66
4. Education level (considering the last school you graduated from) High school 107 19.01
Associate degree 46 8.17
Bachelor's degree 288 51.15
Postgraduate 122 21.67
5. Income level Lower than 2.500 TL 35 6.22
2.500-5.000 TL 136 24.16
5.001-7.500 TL 106 18.83
Higher than 7.500 TL 139 24.69
I do not have any regular income 147 26.11
Table 5 - The Goodness-of-Fit values of the scales* Таблица 5 - Оценка адекватности значений используемых шкал
Scales N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Brand Trust 563 1.00 5.00 3.45 .85
Brand Loyalty 563 1.00 5.00 3.29 .95
Price Sensitivity 563 1.00 5.00 4.07 .77
Brand Preference 563 1.00 5.00 2.88 1.08
Scales GFI CFI NFI IFI
Fit Values 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Perfect Fit 0.95 S GFI S 1.00 0.97 S CFI S 1.00 0.95 S NFI S 1.00 0.95 S IFI S 1.00
Acceptable Fit 0.90 S GFI < 0.95 0.95 S CFI < 0.97 0.90 S NFI < 0.95 0.90 S IFI <0.95
Discrepancy GFI < 0.90 CFI < 0.95 NFI < 0.90 IFI < 0.90
Note: GFI = Goodness-of-Fit Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; NFI = Normed Fit Index; IFI = Incremental Fit Index. * Source: Dogan and Ozdamar [2017].
2 Values of 0.95 and above show a perfect fit for GFI, NFI,
3 and IFI indices and above 0.97 for the CFI index. When the £ goodness-of-fit values are examined, we observe that the | values show a perfect fit.
£ The Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and p-values
u
£ are shown in Table 6.
Table 6 - Inter-variables correlation coefficients Таблица 6 - Взаимосвязь и коэффициенты корреляции
между переменными
Scales Pearson Correlation (r) P
Brand Loyalty ^ Brand Trust 0.65 0.001*
Price Sensitivity ^ Brand Trust 0.03 0.598
Price Sensitivity ^ Brand Loyalty 0.03 0.615
Brand Preference ^ Price Sensitivity -0.02 0.462
Brand Preference ^ Brand Loyalty 0.65 0.001*
Brand Preference ^ Brand Trust 0.12 0.001*
Considering the inter-variable correlation coefficients in Table 6, the price sensitivity variable has a weak and statistically insignificant relationship with brand trust, brand loyalty, and brand preference (p >0.05). Therefore, the research hypotheses 7 and 8 are not supported.
H1 = Brand trust has a positive effect on brand loyalty. A statistically significant, positive, and healthy relationship exists between brand trust and brand loyalty (p < 0.05; r = 0.65).The hypothesis is accepted.
H2 = Brand trust has a positive effect on price sensitivity. We have determined that the price sensitivity variable has a weak and statistically insignificant relationship with brand trust (p >0.05, r = 0.03).
H3 = Brand loyalty has a positive effect on price sensitivity. We have also determined that the price sensitivity variable has a weak and statistically insignificant relationship with brand loyalty (p >0.05, r = 0.03).
H4 = Brand trust has a positive effect on brand preference. A statistically significant, positive, and fragile relationship exists between brand trust and brand preference (p <0.05, r = 0.12). The hypothesis is accepted.
H5 = Brand loyalty has a positive effect on brand preference. A statistically significant, positive, and healthy relationship exists between brand loyalty and brand preference (p <0.05, r = 0.65). The hypothesis is accepted.
H6 = Price sensitivity has a positive effect on brand preference. Similarly, the price sensitivity variable has a weak and statistically insignificant relationship with brand preference (p >0.05, r = -0.02).
H7 = Price sensitivity has a mediating role in the effect of brand trust on brand preference. Price sensitivity does not have any mediating role in the effect of brand trust on brand preference. The hypothesis is rejected.
H8 = Price sensitivity has a mediating role in the effect of brand loyalty on brand preference. Price sensitivity does not have any mediating role in the effect of brand loyalty on brand preference. The hypothesis is rejected.
CONCLUSION
Luxury brands' primary purpose is to present products with the highest quality, unique designs and functions to satisfy consumers' desires and needs. In addition to gaining confidence on a product basis, companies producing luxury brands want to support their products with the quality of the services they offer. Thus, they make efforts to ensure customer trust without compromising on the quality in all processes.
Brand trust is built prior to making a purchase. It continues during and after the purchase. Brand trust covers all processes and components from the brand's materials to the service offered in its stores. Brands that aim to achieve stability in this process can build loyalty. Particularly, the loyalty of those using the brand's products and satisfied with them is instantly created. The process of communication with the consumer also supports building trust.
Consumers remember brands with higher confidence more efficiently, and brand trust means the learning process that prevents consumers from shifting towards competing brands. Surveys show that brand trust increases the market share of brands. Alternatively, the results show that brand trust enhances the positive effect of differentiation from competitors [Pintado et al., 2017]. This study adds to the literature by revealing a statistically significant, positive, and weak relationship between brand trust and brand preference. However, a statistically significant, positive, and healthy relationship is found between brand loyalty and brand preference. Accordingly, one can suggest that brand loyalty has a more substantial effect on brand preferences than brand trust.
Brand trust and brand loyalty, which are essential for companies, are frequently examined in the literature. Based on their research, Delgado-Ballester and Munuera-Aleman [2001], Bennur and Jin [2017] stated that brand trust positively affected brand loyalty. Similarly, the present study's findings demonstrate a statistically significant, positive, and healthy relationship between brand trust and brand loyalty.
The study has determined that price sensitivity has a weak and statistically insignificant relationship with brand trust. For this reason, when brand trust is examined, it is insufficient to evaluate merely the relationship between the consumer and the brand, and it is necessary to take into account macroeconomic factors such as crisis and economic recession in a country.
O'Cass and Frost [2002] reported in their study that consumers with brand loyalty are less price-sensitive than those without loyalty. The present study has also determined that price sensitivity has a weak, statistically insignificant relationship with brand loyalty.
Loyalty can urge consumers to pay higher prices for a product offered by a brand than its competitors [Keller, 2003]. On the contrary, consumers may refrain from purchasing a product due to its price, although their trust
and loyalty to the brand may increase. The study suggests that consumers may not prefer luxury brands due to their price sensitivity, although they trust and become loyal to brands.
The research results show that price sensitivity does not have any mediating role in the effect of brand trust and loyalty on consumers' luxury brand preferences. The effect of price sensitivity and brand trust on brand preference is weak.
Consumer brand preference is an essential step in understanding consumers and has always been a topic of great interest in the marketing domain. Brand preferences reveal the qualities of a brand. They also provide critical input for companies to develop successful branding strategies.
£
et a.
References
Adamson I., Chan K.-M., Handford D. (2003). Relationship marketing: customer commitment and trust as a strategy for the smaller Hong Kong corporate banking sector. International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 21(6/7), pp. 347-358. https://doi. org/10.1108/02652320310498492.
Aktuglu I.K., Temel A. (2006). Tuketiciler markalarini nasil tercih ediyor? Selçuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, vol. 15, pp. 43-59.
Al-Hawari M.A. (2011). Automated service quality as a predictor of customers'commitment: A practical study within the UAE retail banking context. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 346-366. DOI: 10.1108/13555851111143259.
Allen N.J., Meyer J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1-18. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x.
Abdullah-Al-Mamun M.K.R., Robel S.D. (2014). A critical review of consumers' sensitivity to price: Managerial and theoretical issues. Journal of International Business and Economics, vol. 2, pp. 1-9.
Atilgan K.O., Koç O. (2019). Tuketicilerin ev yemegi restoranlarina daha fazla odeme yapma nedenlerinin incelenmesi. Çag Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 49-58.
Atilgan K.O. (2014). Tuketicilerin fiyat hatirlama dogrulugu ile ilijkili faktorlerin belirlenmesi. Eski§ehir Osmangazi Universitesi IlBF Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 81-95.
Azizi S. (2014). A model of factors affecting foreign brand trust. Journal of Competitiveness, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 20-31. DOI: 10.7441/ joc.2014.03.02.
Baj M. (2015). Markayonetimi. Ankara: Detay Yayincilik.
Bennur S., Jin B. (2017). The mediating role of brand trust and affect in clothing brand loyalty formation: a cross-cultural examination of U.S. and India. The Journal of the Textile Institute, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.201.11 33105.
Bowden J.H. (2009). The process of customer engagement: A conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 17, pp. 63-74. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679170105.
Brodie R.J., Hollebeek L.D., Biljana J., Ilic A. (2011). Customer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 252-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703.
Brumley C.M. (2002). Creating loyalty in relationship marketing. West Virginia, USA: West Virginia University Libraries.
Buran i., Koçak A. (2019). Sanal marka topluluklarinda tuketici katilimi. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araçtirmalari Dergisi, vol. 24, pp. 273-302.
Çabuk S., Demirci-Orel F. (2008). Marka karakteristikleri ile marka ve uretici firmaya duyulan guven arasindaki ilijkilerin belirlenmesi: Çukurova Universitesi olçeginde bir arajtirma. Ç.U. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 103-116.
Can P. (2019). Statu tuketiminin fiyat duyarliligina etkisini belirlemeye yonelik bir arajtirma. Anadolu Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 151-170.
Çeçen-Saglam B., Saglam M. (2016). Marka guveni ve marka bagliliginin satin alma niyeti uzerine etkisi: akilli telefon pazarinda bir arajtirma. I^letme ve Sosyal Bilimler Araçtirmalari Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 2147-4478.
Chang H.H., Liu Y.M. (2009). The impact of brand equity on brand preference and purchase intentions in the service industries. The Service Industries Journal, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1687-1706. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060902793557.
Chatterjee S.C., Chaudhuri A. (2005). Are trusted brands important? Marketing Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-16.
Chaudhuri A., Holbrook M.B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brad loyalty. Journal of Marketing, vol. 61, pp. 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255.
Chomvilailuk R., Butcher K. (2010). Enhancing brand preference through corporate social responsibility initiatives in the Thai banking sector. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 397-418. DOI: 10.1108/13555851011062296.
Çinar D. (2019). Dijital ortamda yapilan reklam harcamalarina yonelik algilamalarin tuketici-marka bagliligi boyutlari uzerindeki etkisi. ARHUSS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 88-108.
Coulter K.S., Coulter R.A. (2002). Determinants of trust in a service provider: The moderating role of length of relationship. Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210419406.
® Dawar N. (1996). Extensions of broad brands: the role of retrieval in evaluations of fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 5, fj no. 2, pp. 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0502_05.
§ Dekimpe M.G., Steenkamp J.E.M., Mellens M., Abeele P.V. (1997). Decline and variability in brand loyalty. International Journal of ^ Research in Marketing, vol. 14, pp. 405-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(97)00020-7.
o Delgado-Ballester E., Munuera-Aleman J.L. (2001). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, =T vol. 35, no. 11/12, pp. 1238-1258. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006475.
£ Delgado-Ballester E. (2002). Applicability of a brand trust scale across product categories: A multigroup invariance analysis. S European Journal of Marketing, vol. 38, no. 5/6, pp. 573-592. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560410529222. g Delgado-Ballester E., Munuera-Aleman J.L. (2005). Does brand trust matter to brand equity? Journal of Product &Brand Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510601058.
Derinozlu E. (2020). Luks marka iletiçimi. Ankara: Akademisyen Yayinevi.
Dogan i., Ozdamar K. (2017). The effect of different data structures, sample sizes on model fit measures. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 7525-7533. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2016.1241409.
Doney P.M., Cannon J.P. (1997). Trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, vol. 61, pp. 35-51. https://doi. org/10.1177/002224299706100203.
Dowling G.R., Uncles M. (1997). Do customer loyalty programs really work? Sloan Management Review, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1-24.
Ebrahim R., Ghoneim A., Irani Z., Fan Y. (2016). A brand preference and repurchase intention model: The role of consumer experience. Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 32, no. 13/14, pp. 1230-1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1150322.
Ebrahim R.S. (2013). A Study of Brand Preference: An Experiential View. PhD Thesis, Brunel University.
Fettahlioglu S.H., Birin-Atilgan C., Çildir Ç. (2019). Organik urunlere karji tuketicilerin fiyat duyarliligi ve demografik faktorler açisindan incelenmesi. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, vol. 5, no. 47, pp. 5930-5939.
Flynn L.R., Goldsmith R.E., Kim W.M. (2000). A cross-cultural validation of three new marketing scales for fashion research: Involvement, opinion seeking and knowledge. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022583.
Gokalp N. (2003). Ekonomide guven faktoru. Yonetim ve Ekonomi, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 163-174.
Goldsmith R.E., Kim D., Flynn L.R., Kimm W.M. (2005). Price sensitivity and innovativeness for fashion among Korean consumers. The Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 501-508. https://doi.org/10.3200/S0CP.145.5.501-508.
Gummerus J., Liljander V., Weman E., Pihlstrom M. (2012). Customer engagement in a facebook brand community. Management Research Review, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 857-877. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211256578.
Gurbuz A., Dogan M. (2013). Tuketicilerin markaya duydugu guven ve marka bagliligi ilijkisi. Uluslararasi Yonetim iktisat ve i§letme Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 19, pp. 239-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.11122/ijmeb.2013.9.19.345.
Habibi M.R., Laroche M., Richard M.O. (2014). The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 37, pp. 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.016.
Haciefendioglu §. (2014). Sosyal medyanin marka bagliligina etkisi uzerine bir arajtirma. Kocaeli Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 28, pp. 59-70.
Halim R.E. (2006). The effect of the relationship of brand trust and brand affect on brand performance: An analysis from brand loyalty perspective - A case of coffee instant product in Indonesia. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.925169.
Harris L.C., Goode M.M. (2004). The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: A study of online service dynamics. Journal of Retailing, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002.
Hollebeek L.D., Glynn M.S., Brodie R.J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 28, pp. 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/jJntmar.2013.12.002.
Hwang J., Chihyug O. (2013). The antecedents and consequence of consumer attitudes toward restaurant brands: A comparative study between casual and fine dining restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 32, pp. 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/jJjhm.2012.05.002.
Kalyoncuoglu S. (2017). Markaya duyulan guven ile marka sadakati ilijkisinde marka ajkinin aracilik rolu: Starbucks markasi uzerine bir arajtirma. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 383-402.
Kao D.T. (2019). The impact of envy on brand preference: Brand storytelling and psychological distance as moderators. Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2018-2004.
Keiningham T.L., Frennea C.M., Aksoy L., Buoye A., Mittal V. (2015). A five-component customer commitment model implications for repurchase intentions in goods and services industries. Journal of Service Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670515578823.
Keller K.L. (2003). Strategic brand management, building, measuring, and managing brand equity. New York: Prentice Hall.
Laroche M., Habibi M.R., Richard M.O., Sankaranarayanan R. (2012). The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1755-1767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.016.
Lau G.T., Lee S.H. (1999). Consumers' trust in a brand and the link to brand loyalty. Journal of Market-Focused Management, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 341-370. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009886520142.
Lau M.M., Chang M.T., Moon K.L., Liu W.S. (2006). The brand loyalty of sportswear in Hong Kong. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-13. http://hdl.handle.net/10397/7716.
Leverin A., Liljander V. (2006). Does relationship marketing improve customer relationship satisfaction and loyalty? International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 232-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320610671333.
Libai B. (2011). Comment: The perils of focusing on highly engaged consumers. Journal of Service Research, vol. 14, no. 3, ® pp. 275-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511414583. ^
Lin M.Q., Lee B.C. (2012). The influence of website environment on brand loyalty: Brand trust and brand affect as mediators. ^ International Journal of Electronic Business Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 308-321. ¿
Liu F., Li J., Mizerski D., Soh H. (2012). Self-congruity, brand attitude, and brand loyalty: A study on luxury brands. European o Journal of Marketing, vol. 46, no. 7/8, pp. 922-937. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211230098. g
Luk S.T.K., Yip L.S.C. (2008). The moderator effect of monetary sales promotion on the relationship between brand trust and < purchase behaviour. Journal of Brand Management, vol. 15, pp. 452-464. DOI: 10.1057/bm.2008.12. §
Mabkhot H.A., Shaari H., Salleh S. (2017). The influence of brand image and brand personality on brand loyalty, mediating by £ brand trust: An empirical study. Journal Pengurusan, vol. 50, pp. 71-82. Üj
Matzler K., Bidmon S., Grabner-Kräuter S. (2006). Individual determinants of brand affect: The role of the personality traits of z extraversion and openness to experience. Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 427-434. https://doi. s¿ org/10.1108/10610420610712801. |
Mcgowan K., Sternquist B. (1998). Dimensions of price as a marketing universal: A comparison of Japanese and U.S. consumers. =
Journal of International Marketing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X9800600408. Meydan C.H., §e§en H. (2015). YapisaleçitlikmodellesiAMOS uygulamalari, 2.Baski. Ankara: Detay Yayincilik. Mishra M.K., Kesharwani A., Das D. (2016). The relationship between risk aversion, brand trust, brand affect and loyalty: Evidence from the FMCG industry. Journal of Indian Business Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-04-2015-0045.
Morgan R.M., Hunt S.D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, no. 3,
pp. 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302. Morris M.H., Joyce M.L. (1988). How marketers evaluate price sensitivity. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 17, pp. 169-176. O'Cass A., Frost H. (2002). Status brands: examining the effects of non-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product andBrand Management, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 67-88. https://doi. org/10.1108/10610420210423455. Oliver R.L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, vol. 63, issue 4, pp. 33-44. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/00222429990634s105.
Orzan G., Platon O.E., Stefänescu C.D., Orzan M. (2016). Conceptual model regarding the influence of social media marketing communication on brand trust, brand affect and brand loyalty. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 141-156. Özdemir M., Koçak A. (2012). ílijkisel pazarlama çerçevesinde marka sadakatinin olujumu ve bir model önerisi. Ankara Universitesi SBF Dergisi, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 127-156. Pavlou P.A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.110 44275.
Phau I., Cheong E. (2009). How young adult consumers evaluate diffusion brands: Effects of brand loyalty and status consumption. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, vol. 21, pp. 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530802153185 Pintado T., Sanchez J., Carcelén S., Alameda D. (2017). The effects of digital media advertising content on message acceptance or rejection: Brand trust as a moderating factor. Journal of Internet Commerce, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 364-384. https://doi.org/10 .1080/15332861.2017.1396079.
Power J., Whelan S., Davies G. (2008). The attractiveness and connectedness of ruthless brands: The role of trust. European Journal of Marketing, vol. 42, no. 5/6, pp. 586-602. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560810862525. Rawlins B.L. (2007). Trust and PR practice. The Institute for Public Relations, vol. 1, pp. 1-18. https://doi.
org/10.1108/03090560810862525. Reast J.D. (2005). Brand trust and brand extension acceptance: The relationship. Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 14,
no. 1, pp. 4-13. DOI 10.1108/10610420510583707. Rosenbloom A., Haefner J.E. (2009). Country-of-origin effects and global brand trust: A first look. Journal of Global Marketing,
vol. 22, issue 4, pp. 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911760903022432. Sääksjärvi M., Samiee S. (2007). Nonprice Antecedents of Consumer Preference for Cyber and Extension Brands. Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 22-35. DOI: 10.1002/dir.20072. Çahin E., Gültekin G. (2017). Markaya duyulan güven ve etnosentrik egilimlerin marka sadakatine etkisi: bir marka örnegi. Süley-
man Demirel Universitesi iktisadi ve idari BilimlerFakültesi Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 993-1012. Sashi C.M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships and social media. Management Decision, vol. 50, no. 2,
pp. 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211203551. Saunders M., Lewis P., Thornhill A. (2000). Research methods for business students. 2nd ed. New York: Prentice Hall. Schoenbachler D.D.L., Gordon G., Aurand T.W. (2004). Building brand loyalty through individual stock ownership. Journal of
Product & Brand Management, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 488-497. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420410568426. Solomon R.C., Flores F. (2001). i§ dünyasinda, politikada, iliçkilerde ve yaçamda güven yaratmak. Çeviren: Ahmet Kardam, Acar Matbaacilik, Aralik, istanbul.
Swaen V., Chumpitaz R.C. (2008). Impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust. Rechercheet Applications En Marketing (English Edition), vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/205157070802300402. Swystun J. (2007). The brand glossary. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
S 0 1 Маркетинговые стратегии и практики
® Tolba A.H. (2011). The impact of distribution intensity on brand preference and brand loyalty. International Journal of Marketing * Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 56. DOI: 10.5539/ijms.v3n3p56.
§ Travis D. (2000). Emotional Branding: How Successful Brands Gain the Irrational Edge. California, USA: Prima Publishing. £ Ulker-Demirel E., Yildiz E. (2015). Marka ozgunlugunun marka tercihi, mujteri tatmini ve marka sadakati uzerindeki etkileri: o bilgisayar markalari uzerine bir arajtirma. Marmara Universitesi Oneri Dergisi, vol, 11, no. 4, pp. 83-100. =r Upamannyu N.K., Bhakar S.S., Gupta M. (2015). Effect of corporate image on brand trust and brand affect. International Journal £ of Applied Science-Research and Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 20-33.
< Uslu A., Huseynli B. (2018). Impact of price sensitivity on repurchase intention in terms of personality features. International g Journal of Economics and Administrative Studies, vol. 7, pp. 515-532. DOI: 10.18092/ulikidince.434866.
Uztug F. (2002). Markan kadarkonu$-marka iletiçimistratejileri. Media Cat Yayinlari.
Viktoria-Rampl L., Kenning P. (2014). Employer brand trust and affect: linking brand personality to employer brand attractiveness. European Journal of Marketing, vol. 48, no. 1/2, pp. 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2012-0113.
Volckner F. (2008). The dual role of price: decomposing consumers reactions to price. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0076-7.
Wakefield K.L., Inman J.J. (2003). Situational price sensitivity: the role of consumption occasion, social context and income. Journal of Retailing, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2003.09.004.
Wang E.S.T. (2013). The influence of visual packaging design on perceived food product quality, value, and brand preference. International Journal of Retail& Distribution Management, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 805-816. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJRDM-12-2012-0113.
Wang E.S.T. (2015). Effect of food service-brand equity on consumer-perceived food value, physical risk, and brand preference. British Food Journal, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2013-0260.
Wood L.M. (2004). Dimensions of brand purchasing behaviour: Consumer in the 18-24 age group. Journal of Product and Brand Management, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.154.
Zeithaml V.A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of Marketing, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302.
Zia N., Sohail M. (2016). Factors effecting consumer brand preferences in Automobile Industry. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and Management Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 55-65. DOI: 10.12816/0031492.
Information about the authors
Esra ÖZKAN PÍR
PhD, Assistant Professor of Financial Banking and Insurance Dept. Erzincan Binali Yildirim University (726 Fatih St., Erzincan, 24150, Turkey). E-mail: esraozkanpir@gmail.com.
Evrim DERiNÖZLÜ
PhD in Business Administration and Management (710 FSM Boulevard, Ankara, 06370, Turkey). E-mail: evrimderinozlu@gmail.com.
DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-6-6
Уровень доверия и лояльности люксовому бренду и потребительские предпочтения: посредническая роль чувствительности к цене
Эзра Озкан Пир1, Эврим Деринозлу
1 Эрзинджанский университет, г. Эрзинджан, Турция
Аннотация. Во времена общества потребления многие покупатели отдают предпочтение высококачественным и эксклюзивным дизайнерским брендам. В основе данного тренда лежит широкий диапазон причин, начиная с возможности подчеркнуть свой статус и благосостояние и заканчивая позитивными эмоциями и символической властью, порождаемыми подобными брендами. Исследование направлено на то, чтобы на примере рынка люксовых товаров изучить такие факторы, как уровень лояльности и доверия бренду, предпочтение потребителей к торговой марке и чувствительность к цене, а также установить наличие/отсутствие корреляции между данными переменными. В случае обнаружения данной связи - исследовать посредническую роль чувствительности к цене при влиянии доверия и лояльности бренду на потребительские предпочтения. Методологическую основу исследования составила теория запланированного поведения в контексте прогнозирования действий и намерений потребителей по отношению к люксовым продуктам. Использованы данные онлайн-опроса 563 респондентов, проживающих на территории Турции. Методами исследования послужили корреляционный анализ и методы описательной статистики. Для анализа данных применялись статистические пакеты SPSS 22.0 и AMOS, а также принципы моделирования структурных уравнений. Результаты исследования показали, что роль чувствительности к цене как медиатора между доверием потребителей, лояльностью бренду и потребительскими предпочтениями люксовых товаров не является значимой. Анализ показал наличие положительной корреляции между
доверием, лояльностью и предпочтением бренда. Выявлено слабое влияние чувствительности к цене и доверия к бренду на предпочтения потребителей. Выводы исследования подчеркивают необходимость разработки компаниями успешных маркетинговых стратегий для эксклюзивных брендов.
Ключевые слова: доверие бренду; лояльность бренду; предпочтение бренда; чувствительность к цене; люксовые бренды.
JEL Classification: M31, E21, D11 Дата поступления статьи: 8 октября 2020 г.
Ссылка для цитирования: Озкан Пир Э., Деринозлу Э. (2020). Уровень доверия и лояльности люксовому бренду и потребительские предпочтения: посредническая роль чувствительности к цене // Управленец. Т. 11, № 6. С. 70-84. DOI: * 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-6-6.
Источники
Adamson I., Chan K.-M., Handford D. (2003). Relationship marketing: customer commitment and trust as a strategy for the smaller Hong Kong corporate banking sector. International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 21(6/7), pp. 347-358. https://doi. org/10.1108/02652320310498492.
Aktuglu I.K., Temel A. (2006). Tuketiciler markalarini nasil tercih ediyor? Selçuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, vol. 15, pp. 43-59.
Al-Hawari M.A. (2011). Automated service quality as a predictor of customers' commitment: A practical study within the UAE retail banking context. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 346-366. DOI: 10.1108/13555851111143259.
Allen N.J., Meyer J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1-18. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x.
Abdullah-Al-Mamun M.K.R., Robel S.D. (2014). A critical review of consumers' sensitivity to price: Managerial and theoretical issues. Journal of International Business and Economics, vol. 2, pp. 1-9.
Atilgan K.O., Koç O. (2019). Tuketicilerin ev yemegi restoranlarina daha fazla odeme yapma nedenlerinin incelenmesi. Çag Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 49-58.
Atilgan K.O. (2014). Tuketicilerin fiyat hatirlama dogrulugu ile ili§kili faktorlerin belirlenmesi. Eski^ehir Osmangazi Universitesi iiBF Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 81-95.
Azizi S. (2014). A model of factors affecting foreign brand trust. Journal of Competitiveness, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 20-31. DOI: 10.7441/ joc.2014.03.02.
Ba§ M. (2015). Markayonetimi. Ankara: Detay Yayincilik.
Bennur S., Jin B. (2017). The mediating role of brand trust and affect in clothing brand loyalty formation: a cross-cultural examination of U.S. and India. The Journal of the Textile Institute, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.201.1133105.
Bowden J.H. (2009). The process of customer engagement: A conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 17, pp. 63-74. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679170105.
Brodie R.J., Hollebeek L.D., Biljana J., Ilic A. (2011). Customer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 252-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703
Brumley C.M. (2002). Creating loyalty in relationship marketing. West Virginia, USA: West Virginia University Libraries.
Buran i., Koçak A. (2019). Sanal marka topluluklarinda tuketici katilimi. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Ara§tirmalari Dergisi, vol. 24, pp. 273-302.
Çabuk S., Demirci-Orel F. (2008). Marka karakteristikleri ile marka ve uretici firmaya duyulan guven arasindaki ili§kilerin belirlenmesi: Çukurova Universitesi olçeginde bir arajtirma. Ç.U. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 103-116.
Can P. (2019). Statu tuketiminin fiyat duyarliligina etkisini belirlemeye yonelik bir arajtirma. Anadolu Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 151-170.
Çeçen-Saglam B., Saglam M. (2016). Marka guveni ve marka bagliliginin satin alma niyeti uzerine etkisi: akilli telefon pazarinda bir arajtirma. i^letme ve Sosyal Bilimler Ara^tirmalari Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 2147-4478.
Chang H.H., Liu Y.M. (2009). The impact of brand equity on brand preference and purchase intentions in the service industries. The Service Industries Journal, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1687-1706. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060902793557.
Chatterjee S.C., Chaudhuri A. (2005). Are trusted brands important? Marketing Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-16.
Chaudhuri A., Holbrook M.B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brad loyalty. Journal of Marketing, vol. 61, pp. 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255.
Chomvilailuk R., Butcher K. (2010). Enhancing brand preference through corporate social responsibility initiatives in the Thai banking sector. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 397-418. DOI: 10.1108/13555851011062296.
Çinar D. (2019). Dijital ortamda yapilan reklam harcamalarina yonelik algilamalarin tuketici-marka bagliligi boyutlari uzerindeki etkisi. ARHUSS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 88-108.
Coulter K.S., Coulter R.A. (2002). Determinants of trust in a service provider: The moderating role of length of relationship. Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210419406.
Dawar N. (1996). Extensions of broad brands: the role of retrieval in evaluations of fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0502_05.
Dekimpe M.G., Steenkamp J.E.M., Mellens M., Abeele P.V. (1997). Decline and variability in brand loyalty. International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 14, pp. 405-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(97)00020-7.
Delgado-Ballester E., Munuera-Aleman J.L. (2001). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, vol. 35, no. 11/12, pp. 1238-1258. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006475.
et a.
® Delgado-Ballester E. (2002). Applicability of a brand trust scale across product categories: A multigroup invariance analysis. Euro-fj pean Journal of Marketing, vol. 38, no. 5/6, pp. 573-592. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560410529222. ^ Delgado-Ballester E., Munuera-Aleman J.L. (2005). Does brand trust matter to brand equity? Journal of Product &Brand Manage-£ ment, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510601058. g Derinozlu E. (2020). Luks marka iletiçimi. Ankara: Akademisyen Yayinevi.
^ Dogan i., Ozdamar K. (2017). The effect of different data structures, sample sizes on model fit measures. Communications in Statis-x tics-Simulation and Computation, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 7525-7533. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2016.1241409. m Doney P.M., Cannon J.P. (1997). Trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, vol. 61, pp. 35-51. https://doi. I org/10.1177/002224299706100203.
Dowling G.R., Uncles M. (1997). Do customer loyalty programs really work? Sloan Management Review, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1-24.
Ebrahim R., Ghoneim A., Irani Z., Fan Y. (2016). A brand preference and repurchase intention model: The role of consumer experience. Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 32, no. 13/14, pp. 1230-1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1150322.
Ebrahim R.S. (2013). A Study of Brand Preference: An Experiential View. PhD Thesis, Brunel University.
Fettahlioglu S.H., Birin-Atilgan C., Çildir Ç. (2019). Organik urunlere kar§i tuketicilerin fiyat duyarliligi ve demografik faktorler açisindan incelenmesi. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, vol. 5, no. 47, pp. 5930-5939.
Flynn L.R., Goldsmith R.E., Kim W.M. (2000). A cross-cultural validation of three new marketing scales for fashion research: Involvement, opinion seeking and knowledge. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 110-120. https://doi. org/10.1108/eb022583.
Gokalp N. (2003). Ekonomide guven faktoru. Yonetim veEkonomi, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 163-174.
Goldsmith R.E., Kim D., Flynn L.R., Kimm W.M. (2005). Price sensitivity and innovativeness for fashion among Korean consumers. The Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 501-508. https://doi.org/10.3200/S0CP.145.5.501-508.
Gummerus J., Liljander V., Weman E., Pihlstrom M. (2012). Customer engagement in a facebook brand community. Management Research Review, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 857-877. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211256578.
Gurbuz A., Dogan M. (2013). Tuketicilerin markaya duydugu guven ve marka bagliligi ili§kisi. Uluslararasi Yonetim iktisat ve I^letme Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 19, pp. 239-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.11122/ijmeb.2013.9.19.345.
Habibi M.R., Laroche M., Richard M.O. (2014). The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 37, pp. 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j~.chb.2014.04.016.
Haciefendioglu §. (2014). Sosyal medyanin marka bagliligina etkisi uzerine bir ara§tirma. Kocaeli UniversitesiSosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 28, pp. 59-70.
Halim R.E. (2006). The effect of the relationship of brand trust and brand affect on brand performance: An analysis from brand loyalty perspective - A case of coffee instant product in Indonesia. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.925169.
Harris L.C., Goode M.M. (2004). The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: A study of online service dynamics. Journal of Retailing, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002.
Hollebeek L.D., Glynn M.S., Brodie R.J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 28, pp. 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002.
Hwang J., Chihyug 0. (2013). The antecedents and consequence of consumer attitudes toward restaurant brands: A comparative study between casual and fine dining restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 32, pp. 121-131. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.05.002.
Kalyoncuoglu S. (2017). Markaya duyulan guven ile marka sadakati ili§kisinde marka açkinin aracilik rolu: Starbucks markasi uzerine bir ara§tirma. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 383-402.
Kao D.T. (2019). The impact of envy on brand preference: Brand storytelling and psychological distance as moderators. Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2018-2004.
Keiningham T.L., Frennea C.M., Aksoy L., Buoye A., Mittal V. (2015). A five-component customer commitment model implications for repurchase intentions in goods and services industries. Journal of Service Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 433-450. https://doi. org/10.1177/1094670515578823.
Keller K.L. (2003). Strategic brand management, building, measuring, and managing brand equity. New York: Prentice Hall.
Laroche M., Habibi M.R., Richard M.O., Sankaranarayanan R. (2012). The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1755-1767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.016.
Lau G.T., Lee S.H. (1999). Consumers' trust in a brand and the link to brand loyalty. Journal of Market-Focused Management, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 341-370. https://doi.org/10.1023/AH009886520142.
Lau M.M., Chang M.T., Moon K.L., Liu W.S. (2006). The brand loyalty of sportswear in Hong Kong. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-13. http://hdl.handle.net/10397/7716.
Leverin A., Liljander V. (2006). Does relationship marketing improve customer relationship satisfaction and loyalty? International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 232-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320610671333.
Libai B. (2011). Comment: The perils of focusing on highly engaged consumers. Journal of Service Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 275276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511414583.
Lin M.Q., Lee B.C. (2012). The influence of website environment on brand loyalty: Brand trust and brand affect as mediators. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 308-321.
Liu F., Li J., Mizerski D., Soh H. (2012). Self-congruity, brand attitude, and brand loyalty: A study on luxury brands. European Journal of Marketing, vol. 46, no. 7/8, pp. 922-937. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211230098.
Luk S.T.K., Yip L.S.C. (2008). The moderator effect of monetary sales promotion on the relationship between brand trust and purchase behaviour. Journal of Brand Management, vol. 15, pp. 452-464. DOI: 10.1057/bm.2008.12.
Mabkhot H.A., Shaari H., Salleh S. (2017). The influence of brand image and brand personality on brand loyalty, mediating by brand trust: An empirical study. Journal Pengurusan, vol. 50, pp. 71-82.
Matzler K., Bidmon S., Grabner-Kräuter S. (2006). Individual determinants of brand affect: The role of the personality traits of ¿ extraversion and openness to experience. Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 427-434. https://doi. z org/10.1108/10610420610712801. ^
Mcgowan K., Sternquist B. (1998). Dimensions of price as a marketing universal: A comparison of Japanese and U.S. consumers. > Journal of International Marketing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X9800600408. |
Meydan C.H., §e§en H. (2015). Yapisal eçitlikmodellesiAMOS uygulamalari, 2.Baski. Ankara: Detay Yayincilik. 2
Mishra M.K., Kesharwani A., Das D. (2016). The relationship between risk aversion, brand trust, brand affect and loyalty: Evidence S from the FMCG industry. Journal of Indian Business Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-04-2015- § 0045. ®
Morgan R.M., Hunt S.D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, no. 3, * pp. 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302. £
Morris M.H., Joyce M.L. (1988). How marketers evaluate price sensitivity. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 17, pp. 169-176. 5 O'Cass A., Frost H. (2002). Status brands: examining the effects of non-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous it consumption. Journal ofProduct andBrand Management, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 67-88.https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420210423455. | Oliver R.L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, vol. 63, issue 4, pp. 33-44. https://doi.org/
10.1177/00222429990634s105. Orzan G., Platon O.E., Stefänescu C.D., Orzan M. (2016). Conceptual model regarding the influence of social media marketing communication on brand trust, brand affect and brand loyalty. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 141-156.
Özdemir M., Koçak A. (2012). ili§kisel pazarlama çerçevesinde marka sadakatinin olu§umu ve bir model önerisi. Ankara Universitesi
SBF Dergisi, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 127-156. Pavlou P.A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275. Phau I., Cheong E. (2009). How young adult consumers evaluate diffusion brands: Effects of brand loyalty and status consumption.
Journal of International Consumer Marketing, vol. 21, pp. 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530802153185. Pintado T., Sanchez J., Carcelén S., Alameda D. (2017). The effects of digital media advertising content on message acceptance or rejection: Brand trust as a moderating factor. Journal of Internet Commerce, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 364-384. https://doi.org/10.1080 /15332861.2017.1396079.
Power J., Whelan S., Davies G. (2008). The attractiveness and connectedness of ruthless brands: The role of trust. European Journal
of Marketing, vol. 42, no. 5/6, pp. 586-602. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560810862525 Rawlins B.L. (2007). Trust and PR practice. The Institute for Public Relations, vol. 1, pp. 1-18. https://doi.
org/10.1108/03090560810862525. Reast J.D. (2005). Brand trust and brand extension acceptance: The relationship. Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 14,
no. 1, pp. 4-13. DOI 10.1108/10610420510583707. Rosenbloom A., Haefner J.E. (2009). Country-of-origin effects and global brand trust: A first look. Journal of Global Marketing,
vol. 22, issue 4, pp. 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911760903022432. Sääksjärvi M., Samiee S. (2007). Nonprice Antecedents of Consumer Preference for Cyber and Extension Brands. Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 22-35. DOI: 10.1002/dir.20072. §ahin E., Gültekin G. (2017). Markaya duyulan güven ve etnosentrik egilimlerin marka sadakatine etkisi: bir marka örnegi. Süleyman
Demirel Universitesi ¡ktisadi ve idari BilimlerFakültesi Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 993-1012. Sashi C.M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships and social media. Management Decision, vol. 50, no. 2,
pp. 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211203551. Saunders M., Lewis P., Thornhill A. (2000). Research methods for business students. 2nd ed. New York: Prentice Hall. Schoenbachler D.D.L., Gordon G., Aurand T.W. (2004). Building brand loyalty through individual stock ownership. Journal of Product
& Brand Management, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 488-497. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420410568426. Solomon R.C., Flores F. (2001). i§ dünyasinda, politikada, iliçkilerde ve yaçamda güven yaratmak. Çeviren: Ahmet Kardam, Acar Matbaacilik, Aralik, istanbul.
Swaen V., Chumpitaz R.C. (2008). Impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust. Rechercheet Applications En Marketing (English Edition), vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/205157070802300402. Swystun J. (2007). The brand glossary. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tolba A.H. (2011). The impact of distribution intensity on brand preference and brand loyalty. International Journal of Marketing
Studies, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 56. DOI: 10.5539/ijms.v3n3p56. Travis D. (2000). Emotional Branding: How Successful Brands Gain the Irrational Edge. California, USA: Prima Publishing. Ülker-Demirel E., Yildiz E. (2015). Marka özgünlügünün marka tercihi, mü§teri tatmini ve marka sadakati üzerindeki etkileri: bilgisa-
yar markalari üzerine bir ara§tirma. Marmara Universitesi ÖneriDergisi, vol, 11, no. 4, pp. 83-100. Upamannyu N.K., Bhakar S.S., Gupta M. (2015). Effect of corporate image on brand trust and brand affect. International Journal of
Applied Science-Research and Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 20-33. Uslu A., Huseynli B. (2018). Impact of price sensitivity on repurchase intention in terms of personality features. International Journal
of Economics and Administrative Studies, vol. 7, pp. 515-532. DOI: 10.18092/ulikidince.434866. Uztug F. (2002). Markan kadar konu$-marka iletiçimistratejileri. Media Cat Yayinlari.
Viktoria-Rampl L., Kenning P. (2014). Employer brand trust and affect: linking brand personality to employer brand attractiveness.
European Journal of Marketing, vol. 48, no. 1/2, pp. 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2012-0113. Völckner F. (2008). The dual role of price: decomposing consumers reactions to price. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0076-7.
® Wakefield K.L., Inman J.J. (2003). Situational price sensitivity: the role of consumption occasion, social context and income. Journal fj of Retailing, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2003.09.004.
^ Wang E.S.T. (2013). The influence of visual packaging design on perceived food product quality, value, and brand preference. Interna-£ tional Journal of Retail& Distribution Management, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 805-816. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2012-0113. g Wang E.S.T. (2015). Effect of food service-brand equity on consumer-perceived food value, physical risk, and brand preference. x British Food Journal, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2013-0260.
x Wood L.M. (2004). Dimensions of brand purchasing behaviour: Consumer in the 18-24 age group. Journal of Product and Brand £ Management, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.154.
I Zeithaml V.A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal S of Marketing, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302.
Zia N., Sohail M. (2016). Factors effecting consumer brand preferences in Automobile Industry. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and Management Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 55-65. DOI: 10.12816/0031492.
Информация об авторах
Эзра Озкан Пир
PhD, доцент кафедры банковского дела и страхования. Эрзинджанский университет (24150, Турция, г. Эрзинджан, ул. Фатих, 726). E-mail: esraozkanpir@gmail.com.
Эврим Деринозлу
PhD в сфере бизнес-администрирования и менеджмента (06370, Турция, г. Стамбул, ул. ФСМ, 710). E-mail: evrimderinozlu@gmail.com.
