CC BY
6"RAQOBATBARDOSH KADRLAR TAYYORLASHDA FAN - TA'LIM - ISHLAB CHIQARISH INTEGRATSIYAS INI TAKOMILLASHTIRIS H ISTIQBOLLARI" MAVZUSIDAGI XALQARO ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYA 2023-yil 22-noyabr
THE INFLUENCE OF STEREOTYPES ON THE PROCESS OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: AN EXAMINATION OF RESEARCH AND CONSEQUENCES Nasrullaev Javokhirkhon Ravshankhonovich
Independent researcher, teacher of English at the chair of "Lexicology and Stylistics of English" of Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages, Uzbekistan https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10159995 Abstract. This scholarly article delves into the exploration of stereotypes and their ramifications on the efficacy of pedagogical approaches to intercultural communication. It scrutinizes how stereotypes can give rise to discriminatory practices, transforming inaccurate and unfavorable preconceptions into unjust actions directed at specific individuals or sociocultural collectives. Nevertheless, the article posits that this influence can be ameliorated and averted through the incorporation of intercultural communication components within the curricula of specialized educational institutions and high schools. This proactive measure serves to mitigate the impact of culture shock in subsequent interactions with native speakers of foreign languages while fostering the cultivation of communicative competence.
Keywords: ethnographic analysis; cross-cultural interaction; stereotype phenomena; cultural bias; communication proficiency.
Culture constitutes a multifaceted milieu within which we coexist, cogitate, undergo experiences, and forge interpersonal connections. The enduring human proclivity to appraise reality through the lens of one's own cultural milieu remains pertinent, epitomized by the conviction that one's own worldview stands as the sole veritable paradigm. Ethnocentrism manifests as the utilization of one's own cultural norms as yardsticks for evaluating the conduct of members from other cultural communities. This predisposition often leads to an undue simplification and overgeneralization of other cultures, wherein each individual is cast with the traits ascribed to their cultural identity. It is imperative to underscore that stereotypes may align with prevalent notions about individuals from a given culture; however, they inevitably fall short in providing a precise portrayal of each person due to their inherent uniqueness. Predicting attributes based on ethnic patterns proves to be an impractical endeavor. In recent times, matters pertaining to intercultural sensitivity and communicative proficiency have garnered heightened attention and research scrutiny. Educators bear the responsibility not only to impart students with insights into various cultures but also to underscore that interaction transcends mere information exchange and opinion discourse. It also encompasses the active combat against cultural stereotypes and biases associated with other ethnicities.
Common Ethnic Stereotypes and Their Impacts on Intercultural Relations Widespread narratives concerning stereotypes related to diverse ethnic groups enjoy broad recognition. An often-referenced jest revolves around "Heaven" and "Hell", delineating roles based on ethnicity. The fact that individuals from these regions can find humor in such anecdotes suggests an element of veracity in these portrayals. Stereotypes essentially represent oversimplified and generalized notions concerning distinct groups or their collective cultural heritage. Regardless of their degree of accuracy, they invariably draw from real-world foundations.
When individuals engage with people from diverse cultural backgrounds, they instinctively seek commonalities and shared traits. This inclination stems from a fundamental yearning for establishing close affiliations with those who espouse akin perspectives, customs, or linguistic
"RAQOBATBARDOSH KADRLAR TAYYORLASHDA FAN - TA'LIM - ISHLAB
CHIQARISH INTEGRATSIYAS INI TAKOMILLASHTIRIS H ISTIQBOLLARI" MAVZUSIDAGI XALQARO ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYA 2023-yil 22-noyabr
affinities. The greater the number of shared points, the more at ease individuals tend to be, expediting the establishment of novel interpersonal connections. Nonetheless, it is pivotal to grasp that in situations where commonalities are not readily apparent, a crucial question arises: will we embrace interaction, or will we withdraw from it due to feelings of apprehension and uncertainty?
Irrespective of the chosen course of action, navigating the terrain of uncertainty often culminates in the formulation of stereotypes. Stereotypes are conventionally perceived as a deleterious phenomenon, with their pursuit frequently associated with manifestations of racism and bigotry. Nevertheless, to varying degrees, we all bear responsibility for the propensity to simplify and categorize others, even when our familiarity with them merely encompasses a fragment of their multifaceted persona. Stereotypes materialize as an ubiquitous process, operating both at the collective and individual levels. Yet, the primary predicament inherent in this process arises from the stark contrast between classifying inanimate objects and categorizing human beings. The latter task proves to be markedly more intricate due to the multifarious nature of individuals and their distinctive attributes.
The first facet necessitating consideration is the notion that stereotypes wield a constraining influence on our capacity to assimilate information that contradicts our preconceived precepts. Individuals tend to disregard evidence that challenges their deeply entrenched convictions, particularly when they lack the means or impetus to counter such contrarian information. Stereotypes exhibit a formidable tenacity and present formidable resistance to alteration. Even when confronted with instances that defy these stereotypes, individuals frequently perceive them as isolated exceptions. For instance, if one harbors a long-standing stereotype that characterizes Americans as haughty, and encounters an American who exudes friendliness and affability, the inclination is to perceive this as a unique outlier and not to reconsider the prevailing beliefs concerning that cultural group. Moreover, this selective filtering only serves to reinforce information that corroborates preexisting biases. Ultimately, one observes solely that which aligns with personal inclinations, thereby skewing the decision-making process by basing it on skewed information.
A second salient dimension to consider pertains to the potential of stereotypes to materialize as self-fulfilling prophecies due to the intrinsic linkage between beliefs and behavior. It is essential to acknowledge that the societal valuation of an individual's affiliative group has a substantial bearing on their interpersonal treatment and consequently exerts an indirect influence on their comportment. To illustrate, should individuals of Caucasian descent internalize the belief that they possess inferior athletic prowess in comparison to their African American counterparts, this conviction may translate into underperformance in athletic endeavors, irrespective of the absence of any preconceived notions. Similarly, females may harbor doubts regarding their competence in technical and mathematical domains due to prevailing stereotypes positing their lesser aptitude in these areas relative to males. It is worth underscoring that this belief is unfounded, given that women are equally capable of achieving success in these domains. The repercussions of such stereotyping are markedly adverse, potentially discouraging individuals from investing additional effort in problem-solving endeavors, thereby prompting unwarranted self-doubt. These doubts are often erroneously attributed to factors such as age, ethnicity, gender, nationality, and the like.
It is imperative to note that affirmative stereotypes also feature within the paradigm. Logically, if negative stereotypes can undermine individuals' actual competencies, positive
"RAQOBATBARDOSH KADRLAR TAYYORLASHDA FAN - TA'LIM - ISHLAB
CHIQARISH INTEGRATSIYASINI TAKOMILLASHTIRIS H ISTIQBOLLARI" MAVZUSIDAGI XALQARO ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYA 2023-yil 22-noyabr
stereotypes may conversely serve as catalysts for enhanced performance. This holds true to a certain extent. However, despite their constructive implications, it is important to recognize that stereotypes, whether positive or negative, invariably espouse a reductionist perspective and do not invariably offer a comprehensive overview of the subject matter. In a broader context, especially within the framework of culturally diverse societies, the propagation of positive stereotypes concerning one group may accentuate the prevalence of adverse stereotypes directed at other groups (e.g., notions of indolence, welfare dependency, or criminal predisposition). Consequently, the perpetuation of such stereotypes can engender legal injustices, engender social animosity, and foster racial antipathy, thereby providing a breeding ground for allegations that other groups fail to meet established benchmarks, a contention which does not accurately reflect their actual contributions.
It is crucial to discern a distinction between stereotypes and cultural facts. An astute individual may pose the following query: "How can we differentiate between a stereotype and a factual account?" It is essential to bear in mind that stereotypes emanate from biased perceptions, whereas accurate portrayals of a culture derive from diligent research and empirical evidence. Four criteria are pertinent for ascertaining the validity of any cultural information. The information in question should be characterized as descriptive rather than evaluative, it must be corroborated by multiple independent sources, it should be applicable to at least a statistical majority of the population under consideration, and it should delineate characteristics that differentiate that population from others.
Consider the assertion "The Dutch are tall" within the framework of the criteria employed to ascertain whether it qualifies as a stereotype or constitutes an accurate cultural observation. The initial criterion, pertaining to descriptiveness, is duly met as the statement refrains from making moral judgments. The second criterion, contingent upon empirical research, is attainable, given the available evidence substantiating that the Dutch exhibit above-average stature when benchmarked against global norms. The third criterion, predicated on statistical substantiation, can also be satisfied, as this height attribute is applicable to a majority of, though not all, Dutch individuals. The fourth criterion, relating to contextual delineation (i.e., taller than whom?), presents a relatively more ambiguous aspect. In sum, the statement in its original formulation aligns more closely with an accurate cultural observation rather than a stereotype.
Nevertheless, how can one discern these subtleties without experiential exposure to other cultures? It is imperative to commence by augmenting one's comprehension of their own cultural milieu, concomitantly honing the aptitude for interpreting and comprehending distinct ethnic groups. This elevation in intercultural cognizance encompasses the cultivation of effective communicative proficiencies and the acquisition of competence in the realm of intercultural interaction. This approach endows foreign language instructors and students with the role of "intercultural mediators", individuals adept at critically assessing and grasping the dynamics governing the interplay between two cultures.
Differentiating between stereotypes and authentic depictions of a culture can be a formidable undertaking. Nonetheless, it is an attainable objective through conscious and concerted endeavors. Ultimately, stereotypes and prejudices will persist, yet we possess the capacity to abstain from acting upon them and can actively regulate our conduct. Additionally, we can contribute to this transformation through training in the domain of intercultural communication.
"RAQOBATBARDOSH KADRLAR TAYYORLASHDA FAN - TA'LIM - ISHLAB
CHIQARISH INTEGRATSIYAS INI TAKOMILLASHTIRIS H ISTIQBOLLARI" MAVZUSIDAGI XALQARO ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYA 2023-yil 22-noyabr
Empirical evidence underscores the indispensable role of empathy, respect, openness, and sensitivity to disparities in fostering effective intercultural communication.
Educators should prioritize the establishment of avenues for intercultural communication rooted in the values, cultural norms, and requisites of their students, as opposed to merely adhering to curricula and materials conceived within the native speaker language milieu. A primary focal point within the intercultural language curriculum is the cultivation of students' "ethnic awareness", enabling them to comprehend individuals within their native cultural context.
REFERENCES
1. Cleveland, H. (2000). The limits of Cultural Diversity. In L.A. Samovar & R.E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural Communication: A Reader (9th ed.) (pp. 427). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. Martin, D., Hutchison, J., Slessor, G., Urquhart, J., Cunningham, S. J., & Smith, K. (2014). The Spontaneous Formation of Stereotypes Via Cumulative Cultural Evolution. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1777-1786.
3. Sherman, J. W., Conrey, F. R., & Groom, C. J. (2004). Encoding flexibility revisited: Evidence for enhanced encoding of stereotype-inconsistent information under cognitive load. Social Cognition, 22(2), 214-232.
4. Stone, J., Lynch, C. I., Sjomeling M., & Darley, J. M. (1999). Stereotype threat effects on black and white athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1213-1227.
5. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.
6. Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 670-682.
7. Tavris, C., & Aronson, E. (2008). Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
8. Baird, R. M., & Rosenbaum, S. E. (Eds.). (1999). Hatred, Bigotry, and Prejudice: Definitions, Causes, and Solutions. Prometheus Books.
9. Simpson, C. (2012, April 27). Good Salary, Depending on Where You're Coming From. The National.
10. Roberson, L., Deitch, E. A., Brief, A. P., & Block, C. J. (2003). Stereotype threat and feedback seeking in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 176-188.
11. Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
12. [Link to document in PDF format]. (https://app.box.com/s/chapter-4-stereotypes.pdf)
