Научная статья на тему 'The epic of Jangar: a reason for studying the decline of the oral tradition'

The epic of Jangar: a reason for studying the decline of the oral tradition Текст научной статьи по специальности «Языкознание и литературоведение»

CC BY
313
47
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Журнал
Oriental Studies
Scopus
ВАК
Ключевые слова
ДЖАНГАР / УСТНАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ / УПАДОК / ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ

Аннотация научной статьи по языкознанию и литературоведению, автор научной работы — Dava Taya

While observing the research history of epics, we would find researchers have paid close attention to the origin, development and changes of epics, and paid little attention to the decline of epics. In the article, the author argues the study of decline of Jangar has theoretical and practical importance to understand the vanishing history of dead epics, to understand the necessity of cherishing and spreading the existing oral tradition. Previous studies on the life-cycle history of Jangar mainly concentrated on the its origin and formation, and neglected the issue of its decline and extinction. Therefore, the decline and extinction issue of the Jangar oral tradition should become an important part of Jangar studies, which is as important as the origin and formation issue, and is theoretically significant in preservation of the Jangar oral tradition. The study deals with the decline and extinction of oral traditions of minorities in China, and plays an important role in the preservation and inheritance of living oral traditions as well. It would provide valuable reference materials to understand the life-cycle history of already extinct epics including Greek ones.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Об изучении упадка устной традиции "Джангара"

Наблюдая за историей исследований эпических явлений, мы обнаруживаем, что исследователи уделяют пристальное внимание происхождению, развитию и изменениям эпических явлений и мало внимания упадку эпических явлений. В статье автор утверждает, что изучение упадка героического эпоса «Джангар» имеет теоретическое и практическое значение для понимания исчезающих эпосов, для понимания необходимости сохранять и распространять существующую устную традицию.

Текст научной работы на тему «The epic of Jangar: a reason for studying the decline of the oral tradition»

Copyright © 2017 by the Kalmyk Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Published in the Russian Federation Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the Russian Academy of Sciences Has been issued since 2008 ISSN: 2075-7794; E-ISSN: 2410-7670 Vol. 34, Is. 6, pp. 131-137, 2017 DOI 10.22162/2075-7794-2017-34-6-131-137 Journal homepage: http://kigiran.com/pubs/vestnik

UDC 398

The Epic of Jangar: a Reason for Studying the Decline of the Oral Tradition

Dava Taya 1

1 Ph.D. in Philology, Professor, Inner Mongolia University (Hohhot, People's Republic of China). E-mailLdawataya2009@qq.com

Abstract. While observing the research history of epics, we would find researchers have paid close attention to the origin, development and changes of epics, and paid little attention to the decline of epics. In the article, the author argues the study of decline of Jangar has theoretical and practical importance to understand the vanishing history of dead epics, to understand the necessity of cherishing and spreading the existing oral tradition. Previous studies on the life-cycle history of Jangar mainly concentrated on the its origin and formation, and neglected the issue of its decline and extinction. Therefore, the decline and extinction issue of the Jangar oral tradition should become an important part of Jangar studies, which is as important as the origin and formation issue, and is theoretically significant in preservation of the Jangar oral tradition. The study deals with the decline and extinction of oral traditions of minorities in China, and plays an important role in the preservation and inheritance of living oral traditions as well. It would provide valuable reference materials to understand the life-cycle history of already extinct epics including Greek ones. Keywords: Jangar, oral tradition, decline, research

Epic is one of the worldwide spread oral traditions. And the epic traditions of various ethnic groups differ from each other. While oral traditions of epics in many places including Europe had perished long ago, the epic traditions of some other places, like Asia, have survived till the present day. When those epics including Slavic ones have digressed off people's everyday life and turned to coffee shop and other entertainment occasions, some other epics, like Mongolian ones, still exist as a popular folk culture. And when it comes to epics had perished hundreds of years ago, it is impossible to study their history due to the lack of materials from that time. Therefore, the Mongolian epic tradition could provide favorable conditions for the study of life-cycle history of living oral epics. In other words, an important contribution of Mongolian epic studies to the

world epic study is to clarify some regular patterns in inheritance of living oral epics in traditional socio-cultural environment, and then to reconstruct some life-cycle history of dead epics, like that of Homer's epic [D. Taya 2013]. And it could become a reference to prevent, develop and spread the living oral traditions in the current globalization context.

Epic is a comprehensive art genre which combines storyteller's looks, facial expression, body language, voice, tone, language and musical instrument. That is to say, epic is consisted of language culture, performance culture, customary and social culture. Consequently, epic studies should also include studies of storytellers, texts, performance techniques, inheritance customs, social-cultural context as well as life-cycle history of epics. Concerning the life-cycle history of epics, the origin, development, trans-

formation, decline and digression of epic would also be involved naturally. Current studies of epics mainly concern the origin and formation of epics influenced by studies of Homer issue. That is to study the birth and development of epics based on its written text, taking the Greek epic as a model [MeneTHHCKHH 1963, 1979, 1986; HargypoB 1980; MM2007; ± ^XMM- 1998; 2002]. As to the

decline and digression of epics, scholars adhere to Marx's viewpoints, specifically, 'some arts, for instance epics, are accepted by everyone, in this regard, when art production appears as art production, it would not be created same as the ancient classical format which has significant of time in world history' 1975], and consider epics were created in the age of barbarism, and would decline naturally in civilized society. Especially, Engels' theory of 'we could be aware of basic background in later stage of barbarous society from Homer's Epics, particularly, the Iliad or Homer's epics and all myths are the main heritage Greeks inherited from barbarous society to civilized one' 1975] are cited quite often. As a result, some scholars believe that epics were created at a certain social evolution stage (an earlier stage of barbarous society), and vanish at a certain stage (a later stage of barbarous society or an earlier stage of civilized society), same as other social phenomena. That is to say, formation and digression of epics are historical phenomena, and the 'natural development rule' of human society. As a matter of fact, Marx and Engels did not specialize on epics, instead, cited materials on European epics and related studies, while discussing the evolution of human society. On the other hand, 'Marx and Engels said Iliad, Odyssey were created in a later stage of barbarous society or earlier stage of civilized society, they never said worldwide epics were created in that stage' [Buyankheshig, Tegus-bayar 1990]. For example, Mongolian epics were still prevailing until early 20th century, and some new contents were added then. Then, were Mongols still living in barbarous society even in the early 20th century? Of course, they were not. Mongols had civilized long time ago, and made civilized history of hundreds of years. Some scholars consider epics as the product of 'a people's uncivilized stage' or 'undeveloped era of art'. However, any people or ethnic groups could not express their ideas and thought clearly, let alone creating heroic epics, the summit of oral art, in their uncivilized stage or undeveloped era of art. In fact, 'not even a hundred years have passed since Mongol epics

were recorded in written form for the first time. And some are still alive among the people, and some new epics are found till recent days. Mongols have changed and updated the epics with new awareness in various historical stages, instead of once remembered ancient version (reproduced) without any changes' [Козин 1998]. Therefore, heroic epics are products of ancient and modern times at the same time.

Epic tradition is not 'an art for art's sake', just like present-day arts, but is a type of traditional culture which was created on the basis of socio-cultural needs and has become a part of local people's life, therefore to meet various needs of them. As a consequence, it does not vanish with the birth of 'art for art's sake' immediately, instead to coexist with stage arts due to the needs of different social groups. It is necessary to note that Mongolian epics have coexisted with 'art for art's sake', like Saran Hohogiin Namtar, a modern drama produced by Danzanrabjai. In fact, regardless of extinct or living epics, studies about their origin and early development are all imaginaries, as there are few real materials survived. Therefore, those living or declining oral epics including Mongolian ones could provide true materials and valuable conditions for studying the decline and vanish of epics. Which means it's possible to study the conditions in which epics change, decline, and even vanish, although it's hard to study in which conditions epics started to take shape.

Taking Jangar, the summit of Mongolian epics for example, previous studies concerned its origin and early developments. Outside China, A. Kozin [1998], A. Sh. Kichikov [1976, 1997] and N. Ts. Bitkeev [1990] wrote articles or monographs on the origin of Jangar. Chinese scholars' study mainly focused on origin, formation, development and changes as well. For instance, Buyankheshig's 'Where and When Were Epic Jangar Formed' [Buyankheshig 1981], A. Taibai's 'A Primary Discussion on the origin of Epic Jangar' [Taibai 1982], T. Jamtsa's 'A Discussion of Place and Time Epic Jangar Formed' [Jamtsa 1983] and 'A Trial Discussion of the Formation Date and Place of Jangariin Tuuji Ш ii

ii 1983], G. Buyanbatu's 'About the Origin of Jangar' [Buyanbatu 1984], Oiradbayar's 'A New Discussion of the Formation Time of Jangar' [Oiradbayar. 1986], O. Bayi's 'About the Formation Time of Epic Jangar' [Bayi 1987], Ujume's 'My Opinion about the Formation Time of Jangar' [Ujume 1987], J. Rinchindorji's 'About the Origin Time of Jan-

gaf [Rinchindorji 1988], Liu Hu's 'A Study of the Formation Time of Epics like Jangar' [$P M if ^ 1988], Sh. Norbu's 'Some Issues on the Formation Time, Material Art Culture and Locality of Epic Jangar' [Norbu 1988], Gereljab's 'The Prerequisite and historical cultural factor of Jangar Formation' [ttB^iL ^ 1990], E. Badmara's 'A Study of the Tribe and Time in Which Jangar Formed' [Badmara

1990], Altan-Orgil's 'A Trial Discussion of Time and Place Jangar Formed' [Altan-Orgil

1991], Bao Jinshan's 'A Brief Study on the Formation Date of Jangar' [Bao Jinshan 1991], Rinchindorji's 'Re-discussion of the Formation Time of Jangar'[CtkM^n f Ufa 1991; Rinchindorji 1991], B. Monkhe's 'An Analysis of the Formation Time of Jangar in Relation with the Social Features Described in' [Monkhe 1991], B. Nyamjab's 'A Discussion of the Origination Time of Jangar and some Related Issues' [Nyamjab 1993], D. Naidai's 'An Observation of Jangar's Formation Time from Its Ideological Tendency' [Naidai 1993], Gereljab's 'Two Issues Related with the Origination Time of Jangar' [Gereljab 1993], O. Bayi's 'On the Formation Time of Jangar Epics' [Bayi 1994], B. Nyamjab's 'To Study the Origination Time of Epic Jangar from Various Oirat Customs Described' [Nyamjab 1995], Bayar's ' The Issue of the Formation Time of Jangar's Basic Story' [Effi^ f ^ 1997], all these articles paid attention to the formation time of Jangar. H. Tserenbal's 'The Fixture Time of Geser and Jangar' [Tserenbal 1983], Aradhu's 'A Primary Study of the Formation and Fixture Time of Jangar' [^^T^ f 1985] and 'A Primary Study of the Formation and Fixture Time of Jangar: Concurrent Discussion of the Authorship of Jangar' [^ ^T^ f 1986], Ch. Erentsei's 'The Origination and Fixture Process of Jangar' [Erent-sei 1987], Gereljab's 'On the Time of Jangar Were Formed and Fixed' [Gereljab 1988] and 'The Method of Confirming the Formation and Fixture Time of Jangar' [Gereljab 1996], N. Naranbatu's 'An Elementary Discussion of the Formation and Fixture Date of Jangar from Perspective of History' [Naranbatu 1996], Jog-darma's 'A Discussion of Formation and Fixture Time of Epic Jangar' [Jogdarma 1998] and B. Monkhe's 'To Ascertain the Formation and Fixture Place and Time of Jangar from Its Distribution' 2001] articles all mainly discussed both the formation and fixture issue of Jangar. Jagar's 'A Study of the Time Jangar Originated and Developed' [Jagar 1990-01, 1990-03], B. Purebdeshi's 'To Study

the Formation and Development Time of Jangar from Geographic Location' [Purebdeshi 1991], Rinchindorji's 'About the Formation and Development of Jangar' [{{ffS^^ f ^^ 1996], T. Jamtsa's 'On the Origination and Development of Jangar' [Jamtsa 2004] focused on the origination and development issue of Jangar. In addition, R. Narantuya, a scholar from Mongolia, whose article 'The development and Transmission Issues of Epic Jangar' concerns the development and transmission of Jangar [Narantuya 1990]. As to academic monographs, the Second Part of 'Jangar Study' written by Rinchindorji consists of chapters concerning cultural origin, social prototype, formation date, development and changes, expansion of storyline, development of personalities, and studies the origination and development issue of Jangar from various aspects [C&MfonM 1994]. 'The Four Yellow States of Jangar' by Altan-Orgil links Jangar with the history of the Four Oirats, and aims to clarify the date and place Jangar originated from [Altan-Orgil 1995]. T. Jamtsa's 'The Issue of Jangar' monograph believes the leading character Jangar indicates Genghis Khan, so the whole epic is supposed to reflect the historical events of the 13th century [Jamtsa 1997]. 'The Geographic Condition and Socio-historic Origin of Jangar' by B. Monkhe studies the date and place where epic Jangar originated and formed, and argues it reflects the history of the Torghut Khanate in the 17th-18th centuries [Monkhe 2007]. The above-mentioned publications focus on the origin and formation of Jangar, and attempt to find out the date, place, and tribe Jangar originated from, its formation and development process. As for the publication dates, those works were published in the early 1980s to the late 1990s, and few works were published thereafter.

Basically, previous studies on the life-cycle history of Jangar mainly concentrated on the its origin and formation, and neglected the issue of its decline and extinction. Therefore, the decline and extinction issue of the Jangar oral tradition should become an important part of Jangar studies, which is as important as the origin and formation issue, and is theoretically significant in preservation of the Jangar oral tradition. The study deals with the decline and extinction of oral traditions of minorities in China, and plays an important role in the preservation and inheritance of living oral traditions as well. It would provide valuable reference materials to understand the life-cycle history of already extinct epics including Greek ones.

References

Биткеев Н. Ц. Калмыцкий героический эпос «Джангар». Проблемы типологии национальных версий. Элиста: Калм. кн. изд-во, 1990. 155 с.

Козин С. А. Джангариада. Элиста: АПП «Джан-гар»,1998. 233 с.

Кичиков А. Ш. Героический эпос «Джангар». Сравнительно-типологическое исследование памятника. М.: Наука, Гл. ред. вост. лит-ры,1997. 320 с.

Кичиков А. Ш. Исследование героического эпоса «Джангар». Элиста: Калм. кн. изд-во, 1976. 154 с.

Мелетинский Е. М. Введение в историческую поэтику эпоса и романа. М.: Наука, 1986. 318 с.

Мелетинский Е. М. Палеоазиатский мифологический эпос. М.: Наука, ГРВЛ, 1979. 228 с.

Мелетинский Е. М. Происхождение героического эпоса. М.: Наука, 1963. 460 с.

Чагдуров С. Ш. Происхождение Гэсэриады. Новосибирск: Наука, СО, 1980. 270 с.

Altan-Orgil. Jangar-un Egusugsen Tsag Uye Bolon Gazar Oron-I Turshin Ugulehu ni // Oirad-un Sudulul. 1991.01.

Altan-Orgil. Jangar-un Shira-in Dorben Toru // Obur Mongol-un Soyol-un Heblel-un Horiya. 1995.

Badmara E. Jangar-un Egusugsen Aimag ba Tsag-un Tuhai Shinjilel // Oirad-un Sudulul. 1990. 3-4.

Bayi O. Jangar-un Tuuli-in Egusun Burildugsen Tsag Uye-in Tuhai // Hagan Tengri. 1987. 01.

Bayi O. Jangar-un Tuulis-un Egusun Burildug-sen Tsag Uye-in Tuhai // Obur Mongol-un Undusuten-u Bagshi-in Degedu Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-u Setgul. 1994.04.

Bao Jinshan. Jangar-un Johiyagdagsan Tsag Uye-in Tuhai Tobchi Shinjilelte // Zhao Uda-in Mongol Unduseten-u Bagshi-in Tusgai Mergejil-un Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-u Setgul. 1991.01.

Buyanbatu G. Jangar-un Egusul-un Tuhai // Tsol-mon. 1984. 03.

Buyankheshig. Jangar-un Tuuli Hamiga Hejiye Zohiyagdagsan Tuhai. Obur Mongol-un Yehe Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-u Setgul. 1981. 03.

Buyankheshig, Tegusbayar. 'Mongol Arad-un Aman Zohiyal-un Shinjilel', Obur Mongol-un Yehe Surgaguli-in Heblel-un Horiya, 1990.

D. Taya. Mongol Tuuli Ulamjilahu Jang Uile-i Sudulhu-in Uchir // Obur Mongol-un Yehe Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-u Setgul. 2013.04.

Gereljab. Jangar-un Zohiyagdagsan Tsag Uye Tai Holbugdahu Hoyar Asagudal // Oirad-un Sudu-lul. 1993.04.

Gereljab. Jangar-un Bui Bolju Tolubjigsen Tsag Uye-in Tuhai // Obur Mongol-un Neigem-un Shinjilehu Uhagan. 1988.03.

Gereljab. Jangar-un Bui Bolju Tolübjigsen Tsag Üye-I Todulahu Ündüsen Arga Zam // Oirad-un Sudulul. 1996.01.

Erentsei Ch. Jangar-un Egüsün Bürildüjü Hebshin Togtaburijigsan Yabutsa // Obür Mongol-un Bagshi-in Yehe Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjile-gen-ü Setgül.1987.02.

Jagar. Jangar-un Egüsül Hogjil-ün Tsag Üye-in Shinjilel // Mongol Hele Utga Zohiyal. 1990.01.

Jagar. Jangar-un Egüsül Hogjil-ün Tsag Üye-in Shinjilel // Hagan Tengri, 1990.03.

Jamtsa T. Jangar-un Egüsül Hogjil-ün Tuhai // Hele ba Orchigulga. 2004.03.

Jamtsa T. Jangar Epus Egüsügsen Gazar Ba Tsag-un Tuhai Turshin Ügülehü ni // Or-ün Tsolmon. 1983. 01.

Jamtsa T. Tuuli Jangar-un Uchir // Shinjiang-un Arad-un Heblel-ün Horiya. 1997.

Jogdarma. Tuuli Jangar-un Egüschü Togtaburijigsan Tsag Üye-in Tuhai Ügülehü ni // Baragun Hoitu-in Ündüseten-ü degedü Surgaguli-in Er-dem Shinjilegen-ü Setgül. 1998.02.

Mônkhe B. Jangar tu Tusgagdagsan Neigem-ün Shinji Chinar etse Tegün-ü Zohiyagdagsan Tsag Üye-I Shinjihü ni // Oirad-un Sudulul. 1991.03.

Mônkhe B. Jangar-un Zohiyagdagsan Gazar Züi-in Orchin Higed Neigem Teühen Sorbulji // Ündüsüten-ü Heblel-ün Horiya. 2007.

Naidai D. Jangar-un Gool Üzel sanagan-u Tolüb-shirel Etse Tegün-ü Egüschü Bui Bologsan Tsag Üye-I Ajiglahu ni // Oirad-un Sudulul. 1993.02.

Naranbatu N. Teühen Egüden Etse Irejü Jangar-un Bürildün Togtanigsan Tsag Üye Ba Motel-un Tuhai Güihen Shinjihü ni // Baragun Hoitu-in Ündüseten-ü degedü Surgaguli-in Erdem Shin-jilegen-ü Setgül. 1996.02.

Narantuya R. Jangar-un Tuuli-in Hogjil Hubiral-un Asagudal du // Baragun Hoitu-in Ündüseten-ü degedü Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-ü Set-gül. 1990.01-02.

Norbu Sh. Jangar-un Tuuli-in Zohiyagdagsan Tsag Üye, Ed-ün Soyol Uralig Bolon Gazar Oron Luga Holbogdahu Jarim Asagudal Nugud-un Tuhai // Or-ün Tsolmon. 1988.08.

Nyamjab B. Jangar Tuulis Dehi Oirad Nutug-un Ele Tala-in Oilaburi etse Tegün-ü Egüsügsen Tsag Üye-I Shinjihü ni // Oirad-un Sudulul. 1995.01.

Nyamjab B. Tuuli Jangar-un Egüsügsen Tsag Üye Bolon Tegün d Holbugdahu Jarim Asagudal-un Tuhai Ügülehü ni // Oirad-un Sudulul. 1993.01.

Oiradbayar. Jangar Chohom Ali Üye-in Yamar Bütügel Bolhu Tuhai Shine ber Sudulhu ni // Obür Mongol-un Neigem-ün Shinjilehü Uha-gan.1986.04.

Pürebdeshi B. Jangar-un Tuuli Egüschü Hogjigsen Tsag Hugutsaga-I Gazar Jüi-in Bairishil etse Shinjilehü ni // Oirad-un Sudulul. 1991.04.

Rinchindorji J. Jangar-un Egüsügsen Tsag Üye-in Tuhai // Obür Mongol-un Yehe Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-ü Setgül. 1988.02.

Rinchindorji J.. Jangar-un Egüsügsen Tsag Üye-in Tuhai Dahin Ügülehü ni // Mongol Hele Utga Zohiyal, 1991.02. Taibai A. Jangar-un Tuuli-un Egüsül Garul-un Tuhai. Turshin Ügülehü ni. Shinjiang-un Edür-ün Sonin. 1982. 08.31. Tserenbal H. Geser, Jangar-un Tolübshiregsen Tsag Üye-in Tuhai // Ündüsüten-ü Hele Bichig-ün Ajil. 1983.01. Üjüme. Jangar-un Zohiyagdagsan Tsag Üye-in Tu-hai Minu Üzelte // Hele ba Orchigulga. 1987. 04.

[Aradhü] Щ^Т^ m

шшттлт m

[Aradhü] Щ^Т^ m

^ЙШ^«--ШШ

ймй® m {шшх^тш&ш

[Баяр]Е^ m

[Gereljab]féH|ML^: (>Xfé^))

ШШ^Ж» 1990^2

[B.Mönkhe]

ffiar^Êifits^^га(«тал [Liu Hu] м m

[Rinchindorji] t^M^ m ^i(^fê^) [Rinchindorji] t^M^ m WtëCïfê^)

[Rinchindorji] :( Я

tè ) ' 1994 ^ »

[T. Jamtsa] ff'M^S m

1998^°

: Ш

ШШ - «данадшш) '

References

Bitkeev N. Ts. Kalmytskiy geroicheskiy epos «Dzhangar». Problemy tipologii natsional'nykh versiy [The Kalmyk heroic epic of Jangar. National versions: problems of typology]. Elista, Kalmyk Book Publ., 1990, 155 p. (In Russ.).

Kozin S. A. Dzhangariada [The Jangariad]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.,1998, 233 p. (In Russ.).

Kichikov A. Sh. Geroicheskiy epos «Dzhangar». Sravnitel'no-tipologicheskoe issledovanie pamyatnika [The heroic epic of Jangar. A comparative-typological study pf the literary monument]. Moscow, Vost. Lit. Publ., 1997, 320 p. (In Russ.).

Kichikov A. Sh. Issledovanie geroicheskogo eposa «Dzhangar» [The heroic epic of Jangar: a case study]. Elista, Kalmyk Book Publ., 1976, 154 p. (In Russ.).

Meletinsky E. M. Vvedenie v istoricheskuyu po-etiku eposa i romana [The epic and the novel: an introduction to historical poetics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986, 318 p. (In Russ.).

Meletinsky E. M. Paleoaziatskiy mifologicheskiy epos [The Paleo-Asiatic mythological epic]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979, 228 p. (In Russ.).

Meletinsky E. M. Proiskhozhdenie geroicheskogo eposa [Origins of the heroic epic]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1963, 460 p. (In Russ.).

Chagdurov S. Sh. Proiskhozhdenie Geseriady [Origins of the Geseriad]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1980, 270 p. (In Russ.).

Altan-Orgil. Jangar-un Egusugsen Tsag Uye Bolon Gazar Oron-I Turshin Ugulehu ni [The Jangar epic: the time and place of its creation revisited]. Oirad-un Sudulul (Oirat Studies), 1991, iss. 1 (In Mong.).

Altan-Orgil. Jangar-un Shira-in Dorben Toru [The Four Laws ...]. Inner Mongolia Cultural Publ., 1995 (In Mong.).

Badmara E. Jangar-un Egusugsen Aimag ba Tsag-un Tuhai Shinjilel [The Jangar epic: the time and place of its creation revisited. A case study]. Oirad-un Sudulul (Oirat Studies), 1990, iss. 3-4 (In Mong.).

Bayi O. Jangar-un Tuuli-in Egusun Burildugsen Tsag Uye-in Tuhai [The Jangar epic: the time and place of its creation revisited]. Hagan Ten-gri (Khagan Tengri), 1987, iss. 1 (In Mong.).

Bayi O. Jangar-un Tuulis-un Egusun Burildugsen Tsag Uye-in Tuhai [The Jangar epic: the time and place of its creation revisited]. Obur Mongol-un Undusuten-u Bagshi-in Degedu Sur-gaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-u Setgul (Scholarly Journal of Inner Mongolia Pedagogical Institute), 1994, iss. 4 (In Mong.).

Bao Jinshan. Jangar-un Johiyagdagsan Tsag Uye-in Tuhai Tobchi Shinjilelte [The Jangar epic: brief notes about the time and place of its creation]. Zhao Uda-in Mongol Unduseten-u Bag-shi-in Tusgai Mergejil-un Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-u Setgul (Scholarly Journal of Inner Mongolia National Professional Pedagogical Institute), 1991, iss. 1 (In Mong.).

Buyanbatu G. Jangar-un Egusul-un Tuhai [The Jangar: a history of its emergence]. Tsolmon (Tsolmon), 1984, iss. 3 (In Mong.).

Buyankheshig. Jangar-un Tuuli Hamiga Hejiye Zo-hiyagdagsan Tuhai [Where and when the Jangar was compiled]. Obur Mongol-un Yehe Sur-

gaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-ü Setgül (Scholarly Journal of Inner Mongolia University), 1981, iss. 3 (In Mong.).

Buyankheshig, Tegüsbayar. 'Mongol Arad-un Aman Zohiyal-un Shinjilel' [Studies in Mongolian folklore]. Inner Mongolia University Press, 1990 (In Mong.).

D. Taya. Mongol Tuuli Ulamjilahu Jang Uile-i Sudulhu-in Uchir [The Mongolian epic taletell-ing tradition: a review of studies]. Öbür Mongol-un Yehe Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-ü Setgül (Scholarly Journal of Inner Mongolia University), 2013, iss. 4 (In Mong.).

Gereljab. Jangar-un Zohiyagdagsan Tsag Üye Tai Holbugdahu Hoyar Asagudal [The two problems related to determining the time when the Jangar was compiled]. Oirad-un Sudulul (Oirat Studies), 1993, iss. 4 (In Mong.).

Gereljab. Jangar-un Bui Bolju Tölübjigsen Tsag Üye-in Tuhai [The Jangar epic: the time of its emergence revisited]. Öbür Mongol-un Nei-gem-ün Shinjilehü Uhagan (Social Studies of Inner Mongolia), 1988, iss. 3 (In Russ.).

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

Gereljab. Jangar-un Bui Bolju Tölübjigsen Tsag Üye-I Todulahu Ündüsen Arga Zam [The time of creation of the Jangar epic: some basic approaches]. Oirad-un Sudulul (Oirat Studies), 1996, iss. 1 (In Mong.).

Erentsei Ch. Jangar-un Egüsün Bürildüjü Hebshin Togtaburijigsan Yabutsa [The Jangar epic: the process of compilation]. Öbür Mongol-un Bagshi-in Yehe Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjile-gen-ü Setgül (Scholarly Journal of Inner Mongolia Pedagogical University), 1987, iss. 2 (In Mong.).

Jagar. Jangar-un Egüsül Högjil-ün Tsag Üye-in Shinjilel [The Jangar epic: studying the dates and periods of its creation]. MongolHele Utga Zohiyal (Mongolian Language and Literature), 1990, iss. 1 (In Mong.).

Jagar. Jangar-un Egüsül Högjil-ün Tsag Üye-in Shinjilel [The Jangar epic: studying the dates and periods of its creation]. Hagan Tengri (Khagan Tengri), 1990, iss. 3 (In Mong.).

Jamtsa T. Jangar-un Egüsül Högjil-ün Tuhai [The Jangar epic: its emergence and development]. Hele ba Orchigulga (Language and Translation), 2004, iss. 3 (In Mong.).

Jamtsa T. Jangar Epus Egüsügsen Gazar Ba Tsag-un Tuhai Turshin Ügülehü ni [The Jangar epic: preliminary notes about the time and place of its creation]. Ör-ün Tsolmon (The Morning Star), 1983, iss. 1 (In Mong.).

Jamtsa T. Tuuli Jangar-un Uchir [About the Jangar epic]. Xinjiang People's Publ. House, 1997 (In Mong.).

Jogdarma. Tuuli Jangar-un Egüschü Togtaburijig-san Tsag Üye-in Tuhai Ügülehü ni [The Jangar epic: the time and place of its creation revisited]. Baragun Hoitu-in Ündüseten-ü degedü Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-ü Setgül

(Scholarly Journal of Northwest University for Nationalities), 1998, iss. 2 (In Mong.).

Mönkhe B. Jangar tu Tusgagdagsan Neigem-ün Shinji Chinar etse Tegün-ü Zohiyagdagsan Tsag Üye-I Shinjihü ni [Revisiting the period of creation of the Jangar epic: evidence from social characteristics described]. Oirad-un Sudulul (Oirat Studies), 1991, iss. 3 (In Mong.).

Mönkhe B. Jangar-un Zohiyagdagsan Gazar Züi-in Orchin Higed Neigem Teühen Sorbulji [Toponymy, society and history in the Jangar epic: a case study]. National Publ., 2007 (In Mong.).

Naidai D. Jangar-un Gool Üzel sanagan-u Tölüb-shirel Etse Tegün-ü Egüschü Bui Bologsan Tsag Üye-I Ajiglahu ni [Determining the time of creation of the Jangar epic: evidence from wordlview attitudes mirrored in the text]. Oirad-un Sudulul (Oirat Studies), 1993, iss. 2 (In Mong.).

Naranbatu N. Teühen Egüden Etse Irejü Jangar-un Bürildün Togtanigsan Tsag Üye Ba Motel-un Tuhai Güihen Shinjihü ni [Brief notes on the time of creation of the Jangar epic: a historical analysis]. Baragun Hoitu-in Ündüseten-ü degedü Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-ü Setgül (Scholarly Journal of Northwest University for Nationalities), 1996, iss. 2 (In Mong.).

Narantuya R. Jangar-un Tuuli-in Högjil Hubiral-un Asagudal du [Development of the Jangar epic revisited]. Baragun Hoitu-in Ündüseten-ü degedü Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-ü Setgül (Scholarly Journal of Northwest University for Nationalities), 1990, iss. 1 - 2 (In Mong.).

Norbu Sh. Jangar-un Tuuli-in Zohiyagdagsan Tsag Üye, Ed-ün Soyol Uralig Bolon Gazar Oron Luga Holbogdahu Jarim Asagudal Nugud-un Tuhai [The Jangar epic: the time of its creation revisited, with some evidencefrom material culture and toponymy]. Ör-ün Tsolmon (Morning Star), 1988, iss. 8 (In Mong.).

Nyamjab B. Jangar Tuulis Dehi Oirad Nutug-un Ele Tala-in Oilaburi etse Tegün-ü Egüsügsen Tsag Üye-I Shinjihü ni [Determining the time ofcreation of the Jangar epic: evience from the whereabouts of the Oirat Nutuq described in the epic]. Oirad-un Sudulul (Oirat Studies), 1995, iss. 1 (In Mong.).

Nyamjab B. Tuuli Jangar-un Egüsügsen Tsag Üye Bolon Tegün d Holbugdahu Jarim Asagudal-un Tuhai Ügülehü ni [About the time of creation of the Jangar epic and some related issues]. Oirad-un Sudulul (Oirat Studies), 1993, iss. 1 (In Mong.).

Oiradbayar. Jangar Chohom Ali Üye-in Yamar Bütügel Bolhu Tuhai Shine ber Sudulhu ni [The time of creation of the Jangar epic: a review of the latest studies]. Öbür Mongol-un Neigem-ün Shinjilehü Uhagan (Social Studies of Inner Mongolia), 1986, iss. 4 (In Mong.).

Pürebdeshi B. Jangar-un Tuuli Egüschü Högjigsen Tsag Hugutsaga-I Gazar Jüi-in Bairishil etse

Shinjilehu ni [Determining the time of creation of the Jangar epic: evidence from toponymy]. Oirad-un Sudulul (Oirat Studies), 1991, iss. 4 (In Mong.).

Rinchindoiji J. Jangar-un Egusugsen Tsag Uye-in Tuhai [The Jangar epic: about the period of its creation]. Obur Mongol-un Yehe Surgaguli-in Erdem Shinjilegen-u Setgul (Scholarly Journal of Inner Mongolia University), 1988, iss. 2 (In Mong.).

Rinchindorji J. Jangar-un Egusugsen Tsag Uye-in Tuhai Dahin Ugulehu ni [The Jangar epic: once again about the period of its creation]. Mongol Hele Utga Zohiyal (Mongolian Language and Literature), 1991, iss. 2 (In Mong.).

Taibai A. Jangar-un Tuuli-un Egusul Garul-un Tuhai. Turshin Ugulehu ni [The Jangar epic: preliminary notes about its emergence]. Shinji-ang-un Edur-un Sonin (Xinjiang Daily News), 1982, 31 August (In Mong.).

Tserenbal H. Geser, Jangar-un Tolubshiregsen Tsag Uye-in Tuhai [The Geser and Jangar epics: the time of their compilation revisited]. Undusuten-u Hele Bichig-un Ajil (National Languages and Scripts), 1983, iss. 1 (In Mong.).

Ujume. Jangar-un Zohiyagdagsan Tsag Uye-in Tuhai Minu Uzelte [The problem of determining the time of creation of the Jangar epic: a personal viewpoint]. Hele ba Orchigulga (Language and Translation), 1987, iss. 4 (In Mong.).

[Aradhu] M/T^ M

^» 1985^2^ (In Chin.) <>

[Aradhu] P^/T^ M

^Wsm«--M «M/K» Ê'J^fô

m im^mxmwgmt^m

» 1986^1^ (In Chin.) <=

^?±^4Ж» 1997^3Ш (In Chin.) »

[Gereljab]fêH|M№ : «>Xfê^»

«ЙШ^Ж» 1990^2

Ш (In Chin.) ° [B.Monkhe]

га «итал

^Ш> 200№Ш (In Chin.) » [Liu Hu] M M

ш (In Chin.) ° [Rinchindorji] «Ш^ M

(In Chin.) ° [Rinchindorji] МШ^ M

2Ш (In Chin.) ° [Rinchindorji] :« Я ХШ

^ tè » - 1994 ^

(In Chin.) ° [T. Jamtsa] ff'M^S M

г^шгам^га®

1983^2Ш (In Chin.) »

(In Chin.) »

1998^ (In

Chin.) °

2002^ (In

Chin.) °

?±'1975^ (In Chin.) »

'irat-айж

M±'1975^ (In Chin.) о

УДК 398

Об изучении упадка устной традиции «Джангара»

Дава Таяа 1

1доктор филологических наук (Ph.D. of Philology), профессор, Университет Внутренней Монголии (Хухэ-Хото, КНР). E-mail: dawataya2009@qq.com

Аннотация. Наблюдая за историей исследований эпических явлений, мы обнаруживаем, что исследователи уделяют пристальное внимание происхождению, развитию и изменениям эпических явлений и мало внимания—упадку эпических явлений. В статье автор утверждает, что изучение упадка героического эпоса «Джангар» имеет теоретическое и практическое значение для понимания исчезающих эпосов, для понимания необходимости сохранять и распространять существующую устную традицию.

Ключевые слова: Джангар, устная традиция, упадок, исследование

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.