CC BY
6
Russian Journal of Linguistics
ISSN 2687-0088 (print), ISSN 2686-8024 (online)
2023 Vol. 27 No. 2 363-391
http://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics
Tense-aspect constructions in Jish Arabic: Morphological, syntactic, and semantic features
Sandy HABIB 0
Tel-Hai Academic College, Israel E3mhsandy3 @gmail.com; havivsan@telhai.ac.il
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the present and past tense-aspect constructions in Jish Arabic, an undocumented Arabic variety of Upper Galilee (Israel), and delineate their morphological, syntactic, and semantic features. Nine such constructions are identified, and the structure of each construction is discussed. In addition, using the Natural Semantic Metalanguage approach (NSM), an explication (a definition using simple words) of the meaning of each construction is presented. In discussing the Jish Arabic constructions, a comparison is made with their English counterparts, which are chosen as a familiar point of reference. The comparison with English does not make the explications prone to Anglocentrism, as the explications are built via a simple, universal language. This language ensures their translatability into Jish Arabic and their verification by native Jish Arabic speakers. In addition, it makes their meanings accessible to non-specialists, as the explications can be translated into any language. This study can be seen as a contribution to the field of theoretical linguistics, particularly descriptive linguistics, as it documents the tense-aspect constructions of an undocumented variety. In addition, it can be seen as a contribution to the field of applied linguistics, especially as it compares these constructions to their English counterparts. It is hoped that this paper will stimulate the investigation of tense-aspect constructions in other non-standard Arabic varieties, most of which are undocumented.
Keywords: tense, aspect, tense-aspect constructions, Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM), Jish Arabic, English
For citation:
Habib, Sandy. 2023. Tense-aspect constructions in Jish Arabic: Morphological, syntactic, and semantic features. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (2). 363-391. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-32925
© Sandy Habib, 2023
licci ®® I This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License KJEisd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode
Видо-временные конструкции в арабском языке района Джиш: морфологические, синтаксические и семантические особенности
Сэнди ХАБИБ И
Академический колледж Тель-Хаи, Израиль Smhsandy3@gmail. com; havivsan@telhai.ac.il
Аннотация
Цель статьи - рассмотреть различные видо-временные конструкции в незадокументирован-ном арабском языке района Джиш (Верхняя Галилея, Израиль) и очертить их морфологические, синтаксические и семантические особенности. В работе обсуждается структура девяти конструкций и объясняется их значение. Дается экспликация значения каждой конструкции (определение значения простыми словами), которая формулируется с применением Естественного Семантического Метаязыка (ЕСМ). При обсуждении исследуемых арабских конструкций проводится их сравнение с английскими аналогами, которые выбраны в качестве точки отсчета. Сравнение с английским языком не делает экспликации англоцентристскими, так как ЕСМ обеспечивает их переводимость на арабский язык, используемый жителями Джиша, и их верификацию носителями этого языка. Более того, он делает их доступными неспециалистам, так как данные экспликации могут быть переведены на любой язык. Исследование вносит вклад в теоретическую лингвистику, в частности описательную, так как фиксирует видо-временные конструкции ^задокументированного языка, а также в прикладную лингвистику, поскольку в нем даны результаты сопоставительного анализа конструкций исследуемого языка с английским. Данная статья может стимулировать изучение видо-времен-ных конструкций в других нестандартных вариантах арабского языка, большинство из которых незадокументированы.
Ключевые слова: время, вид, видо-временные конструкции, ЕСМ, арабский язык района Джиш, английский язык
Для цитирования:
Habib S. Tense-aspect constructions in Jish Arabic: Morphological, syntactic,
and semantic features. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2023. V. 27. № 2. P. 363-391. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-32925
1. Introduction
Describing the tense-aspect constructions of an undescribed language variety can have three major benefits. First, it contributes to the documentation of the variety, a process which is of great importance, especially when it comes to endangered varieties. Such a documentation can reveal the richness of, not only the target variety, but also the culture of the people speaking it. Second, it allows the linguist to conduct contrastive linguistic studies in which the tense-aspect constructions of the target variety are compared to their counterparts in other varieties and/or languages; here, the comparison can be on the morphological, syntactic, and/or semantic levels. Third, it benefits people who wish to learn the variety.
The tense-aspect constructions in Modern Standard (MS) Arabic have been extensively described throughout the history of this language (Alsaif 2017, Alasmari, Watson & Atwell 2018, Fayyad 1997, Al-Saleemi 1987, Gadallah 2017, 2006, Mohammad 1982, Bahloul 2007, Ryding 2005). They have also been described in a few non-standard Arabic varieties (Eisele 1999, Brustad 2000, Bruweleit 2015, Moshref 2012). Yet, they have not been studied in the overwhelming majority of non-standard Arabic varieties. One of these varieties is Jish Arabic, described in Section 2 below. The aim of this paper is thus to describe the different tense-aspect constructions in this variety and discuss their meanings. This being so, this study is a "micro-linguistic" level study with implications for the fields of pure linguistics (more specifically, language documentation) and applied linguistics (particularly, FL teaching), points that will be elaborated on in the discussion.
Examining the micro-, rather than the macro-, linguistic level can yield more precise results. I employ the term micro-linguistic level to refer to one speech form spoken by a certain community residing in one relatively small town, and I use the term macro-linguistic level to refer to (very) similar speech forms of communities residing in the same region (which can be part of a country, a whole country, or even a number of countries, as is the case with the Arab world). Targeting the macro-linguistic level means viewing similar speech forms of different communities as if they were one speech form. While such speech forms can be very similar to each other (especially those which are geographically adjacent to each other), they are not identical; they can differ phonologically, semantically, morphologically, and/or syntactically.
The structure of this paper is as follows. Section 2 provides a theoretical background, and it is divided into two subsections: Subsection 2.1 defines the concepts of tense and aspect, and Subsection 2.2 introduces the reader to Jish Arabic. Section 3 discusses the method of explicating1 the meanings of the Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions in a simple, universal language. Section 4 presents the different Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions and the explications of their meanings. Section 5 is the discussion, and Section 6 is the conclusion.
2. Theoretical foundations 2.1. Background and goals
Before analyzing the Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions, it is important to clarify what is meant by the terms tense and aspect. From a pedagogical perspective, the meanings of these two terms seem to be regarded as straightforward and easily explained, and one would not fail to notice this if they peruse, e.g., different English grammar textbooks (see, e.g., Dray et al. 1993, Green 1995, Murphy 2019). From a linguistic perspective, on the other hand, the meanings of
1 In the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach, the word explicate means 'to define using semantic primes (and molecules).' See the methodology section.
these two terms are not straightforward. Linguists can disagree on the number of tenses and aspects in, for instance, English because they do not appear to agree on what to include under these two terms (cf. Kroeger 2005: 159). Delving into a detailed treatment of this topic is outside the scope of this article, but a brief discussion of it is still necessary.
The term tense should not be equated with time. Native speakers of any language can talk about the present moment, what preceded it, and what can come after it, as all languages have exact semantic equivalents of the English words now, before, and after (Goddard 2008, Goddard & Wierzbicka 1994, 2002, Peeters 2006). However, not every language expresses time reference through its verbal system, to which the term tense is typically restricted.
Tense can be defined as the expression of the location of an event or state in time via the language's verbal system (Comrie 1985: 9, Dixon 2012: 5, Givon 2001: 285). While linguists agree on this definition, they do not agree on the number of tenses in a certain language, as this number depends on whether or not linguists confine their definition of tense to the morphology of the verb in that language.
If tense is defined as the time reference indicated by verb morphology, English, for example, would be said to have only two tenses, past and non-past (Crystal 1997: 196). If the verb is in its second form (V2), it refers to a time in the past (e.g., I played basketball); if it is in its first form (V1) and is not preceded by to, it can refer to the present (e.g., I play basketball) or future (e.g., I will play basketball tomorrow). If the definition of tense is not confined to verb morphology, English would be said to have more than two tenses.
Exactly how many tenses a language has depends on what the linguist includes under this term. Givon (2001, 286), for example, states that English has four tenses: past (e.g., She watched the whale), present (e.g., She is watching the wale), future (e.g., She will watch the whale), and habitual (e.g., She always watches whales). On the other hand, Rozakis (2003) writes that English has six tenses: present (I live here), past (I lived here), future (I will live here), present perfect (I have lived here), past perfect (I had lived here), future perfect (I will have lived here). Declerck (2015) argues that English has eight tenses; to the six tenses mentioned by Rozakis, Declerck adds the conditional (I would live here) and the conditional perfect (I would have lived here). It is worth noting that Rozakis's (2003) analysis is more pedagogical in the sense that it echoes that of EFL grammar textbooks, which present six tenses under the heading "tenses" while the conditionals under their own heading (see, e.g., Murphy 2019).
As can be seen, unlike Rozakis (2003) and Declerck (2015), Givon (2001) does not regard the perfect as a tense; this is because he regards it as an aspect. Kroeger (2005: 159) points out that linguists do not agree on whether to classify the perfect as a tense or an aspect, as it has features of both. But what is aspect?
Aspect can be defined as the way the predicate (roughly, the verb phrase and minimally the verb) is presented. One can speak of two main kinds of aspect, lexical and morphological. Lexically, predicates can be either events (e.g., I ate the apple)
or states (e.g., I am here). Morphologically, a predicate can have perfective aspect or imperfective aspect. The perfective aspect presents the event as a whole (e.g., I ate the apple) and not as a process. The imperfective aspect presents the event as a process, and it can be of different kinds, such as the progressive (e.g., I am eating the apple), habitual (e.g., I used to eat apples), and iterative (e.g., I will keep on doing it) (Kroeger 2005: 152-57).
When discussing the forms of the verb in Classical and MS Arabic, contemporary Arabic grammarians who write in Arabic follow the traditional grammarians in talking about three siyagh (¿^>) 'forms': al-amr (j^Vl), al-madi (^Ul), and al-mudari" (Alshartuni 1969, Bukhdud 1987, Malik 2007
[13th cen.]). Al- amr 'lit. the order' is the imperative mood. Al-madi 'lit. the past' is the form used to talk about past states or events in declarative and interrogative statements. This form can also be used to refer to the future in some conditional and optative constructions. For example, the sentence ghafara allahu laka (¿i ^ ji) can mean either 'God forgave you' or 'May God forgive you.' Al-mudari" 'lit. the similar' form is employed to refer to the present in declarative sentences, to the past when preceded by, e.g., the negative marker lam (<=J), and to the future when preceded by, e.g., the negative marker lan (ji). Consider the following three sentences: (1) yaktubu alwaladu jumlatan (<^4 ^jil 4^1) 'The boy writes a sentence,' (2) lam yaktubi2 alwaladu jumlatan (<^4 ^ji' fi) 'The boy did not write a sentence,' and (3) lan yaktuba alwaladu jumlatan (<^4 iijil ji) 'The boy will not write a sentence.'
Linguists describing in English the syntax of MS Arabic or a non-standard Arabic variety use the word perfect or perfective to refer to al-madi 'lit. the past' form and the word imperfect or imperfective to refer to al-mudari" 'lit. the similar' form. At the same time, they do not agree on whether the verbal system in MS Arabic or any of the non-standard varieties encodes tense and/or aspect (Fayyad 1997, Eisele 1999, Brustad 2000, Holes 2004, Ryding 2005, Aoun, Benmamoun, & Choueiri 2010, Bruweleit 2015, Gadallah 2006, 2017, Alsaif 2017 Alasmari, Watson, & Atwell 2018, Mudhsh 2021). In this paper, I use the term perfective to refer to al-madi 'lit. the past' form and the term imperfective to al-mudari" 'lit. the similar' form.
It is worth noting that Arabic grammar textbooks written in Arabic focus exclusively on the description of Classical and MS Arabic and never on the nonstandard varieties. Thus the grammatical terms al-madi and al-mudari" are familiar to native Arabic speakers solely from Arabic grammar classes at school. While the MS Arabic word al-madi has an equivalent in the non-standard varieties, the word al-mudari" does not. Therefore, whilst the literal meaning of the former term is easily understood, that of the latter is not.
2 The jussive mood of the MS Arabic verb yaktubu (s^. | 3.M.IPFV-write(SG)-IND) is yaktub (S^i. | 3.M.IPFV-write(SG)-JUSS). In the example, the -i in yaktubi (4% is an epenthetic vowel added because the verb is followed by a word beginning with a consonant.
Based on anecdotal evidence gathered from educated Arabic speakers in Jish and elsewhere, I have found that their understanding of al-madi and al-mudari' forms is partially correct. They seem to understand al-madi form as referring exclusively to the past. Since al-madi and al-mudari' forms are always contrasted in Arabic grammar classes, native Arabic speakers seem to understand al-mudari' form as referring to the present. All the native speakers consulted thought that al-mudari' meant al-hadir (j^UJl) 'the present.' None of them realized that it means mushabih (4l^u>) 'similar' and that it is so called due to the fact that this verbal form receives the dammat 'indicative marker' and the fathat 'subjunctive marker,' which look the same as the nominative and accusative markers attached to nouns (cf. Sibawayh 1988 [8th cen.]: 13).
In this paper, I will not talk about tense and aspect separately but rather about tense-aspect constructions. In Section 4, I will present the different Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions and explicate their meanings in a simple, universal language.
Before setting out to explicate the different Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions, it should be pointed out that verbs belong to different categories. Givon (2001: 287), for example, divides the verbs in the lexicon of all languages into "four major groups in terms of their inherent aspectuality," that is:
(1) activity verbs, which describe an activity or a process and constitute the majority of verbs in any language, e.g. read, eat, and dance; semantically, they imply "doing something for some time"
(2) compact verbs, which describe events of very short duration and which can be understood as referring to "a moment," e.g. shoot, kick, and jump
(3) accomplishment verbs, whose meaning involves the component "someone did something because they wanted something to happen," e.g. leave and come
(4) stative verbs, which refer to states, e.g. know, want, and believe.
Owing to space constraints, in this paper, the semantic analyses and
explications will be restricted to the first three categories, which refer to action verbs. As the term compact may sound obscure, I will employ the term done-in-a-moment instead. The meanings of done-in-a-moment, accomplishment, and activity verbs can be described via the semantic prime do; consequently, in what follows, I will provide a general explication of each of the three types of verbs using the Jish Arabic verb imil 'do.'
In Section 4, I will present the Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions while comparing them to the following English tense-aspect constructions. The order of the presentation is as follows. Subsection 4.1 discusses the past constructions, viz. the Jish Arabic counterparts of the following English constructions:
1. Past simple
2. Past progressive
3. Past perfect simple
4. Past perfect progressive
5. Habitual past
Subsection 4.2 discusses the present tense-aspect constructions, that is the Jish Arabic counterparts of the following English constructions:
1. Present simple
2. Present progressive
3. Present perfect simple
4. Present perfect progressive
I do not include the future for two reasons. The first is space constraints. The second is owing to a lack of consensus among linguists on whether or not the future is regarded as a tense. For example, Givon (2001: 286) treats the English future as a tense, but Dixon (2012: 8) does not; he remarks:
In a language of type II, the grammatical system of tense is confined to past and (in many instances) present time. There is no overarching grammatical term referring to 'future'. One has instead to choose the appropriate member from a system of modalities. English is of this type. Past time is shown by past tense inflection on the verb, as in John went out hunting yesterday. But if one shifts from 'yesterday' to 'tomorrow' then the speaker of English must choose between stating an obligation (John should go out hunting tomorrow), or a necessity (John must go out hunting tomorrow), or a prediction (John will go out hunting tomorrow), or a conjecture (John may go out hunting tomorrow), and so on.
The same is true of Jish Arabic. Jish Arabic uses the verb rah 'lit. go' followed by the imperfective form of the verb to refer to a future event, as in sandi rah yakul 'Sandy will eat.'
If this construction, that is rah+imperfective, is included in this paper, the reader may justifiably wonder why other similar constructions, namely the Jish Arabic equivalents of the English modal constructions, are not included. The length required to treat so many constructions would greatly reduce the readability of this paper. This being so, I will limit the discussion to the constructions mentioned above.
It is worth noting that I discuss the Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions in reference to (or in partial comparison with) English. I am not discussing them in full comparison with their English counterparts, as I am not discussing the English tense-aspect constructions and comparing them to their Jish Arabic counterparts. Nor am I discussing the Jish Arabic constructions through the prism of English, as the aim of the paper is to explicate the meanings of these constructions in a simple, universal language and thus avoid Anglocentrism. Reference to the English tense-aspect constructions is meant simply to facilitate comprehension of their Arabic counterparts.3
3 So Wittgenstein (1953: 82) remarks that the "common behaviour of mankind is the system of reference by means of which we interpret an unknown language."
2.2. Jish Arabic
Arabic is a diglossic language; that is to say, it has two forms, High and Low. The High form is the standardized register, but it is not spoken natively by anyone. About 1400 years ago, this form seems to have been the mother tongue of the people of Najd (an area in present-day Saudi Arabia), although some claim that it was merely a literary language (in Fakhouri 1986: 50, in Aoun, Benmamoun, & Choueiri 2010: 1). It was also the language of Arabic poetry; even those poets who natively spoke other forms of Arabic used this form in their poems. The advent of Islam saw the standardization of this form, particularly because it was the language of the Quran. Today, this form is known as Classical Arabic, and its modern version (which has been developed by litterateurs and the media over the years) is known as Modern Standard (MS) Arabic. MS Arabic is used in formal settings, such as courts, schools, and media (Fakhouri 1986: 49-51, Holes 2018).
The Low form consists of a myriad of varieties, and each variety is the mother tongue of a community of speakers. The mutual intelligibility between any two varieties is in inverse relation to the geographical distance between them; the closer they are, the more mutually intelligible they are (Aoun, Benmamoun, & Choueiri 2010: 2). Unlike MS Arabic, none of these varieties has been developed into a variety used in all formal settings.
Jish Arabic is one of those varieties. It is spoken natively by about 3,000 people residing in Jish. Jish itself is a small town in northern Israel, about five kilometers from the Israeli-Lebanese borders. The present author was born, grew up, and resides in Jish and speaks Jish Arabic natively. Its grammar, like the grammar of the overwhelming majority of non-standard Arabic varieties, has not been fully described. In addition, there is no corpus of Jish Arabic, and hence, I rely on my knowledge of the language as well as on consulting other native speakers.
The Jish Arabic verbal system encodes aspect. In the interlinear gloss, the perfective aspect will be indicated by <pfv> and the imperfective aspect by <ipfv>. In addition, verbs can occur in the active participle, which will be indicated by <ACTPTCL>.
3. Methodology
Discussing the meanings of the different tense-aspect constructions in Jish Arabic requires a method that can evade ambiguity, complexity, and Anglocentrism. Words like tense, perfect, aspect, perfective, imperfective, and durative, for example, do not have equivalents in Jish Arabic. Using them to describe the tense-aspect constructions in Jish Arabic will result in descriptions that cannot be translated into the target language, and thus, cannot be verified by native speakers of this language. Overcoming this obstacle is possible through the Natural Semantic Metalanguage.
The Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) is a theory developed by Anna Wierzbicka, Cliff Goddard, and colleagues for over 50 years (Wierzbicka 1972,
1980, 2021, Goddard & Wierzbicka 1994, 2002a, Goddard 2008a, Gladkova 2010, Gladkova & Larina 2018, Levisen 2012, Goddard & Wierzbicka 2014, Goddard 2018, Bromhead & Ye 2020, Habib 2021, Goddard, Wierzbicka & Farese 2022). It has a number of key constructs, three of which are semantic primes, universal grammar, and explications.
Semantic primes are simple, universal concepts. They are simple in the sense that they are indefinable, and they are universal in the sense that they have exact equivalents in all languages. Their simplicity is attested through trial and error, and their universality has been proven by locating their exact equivalents in genetically and geographically different languages. Their number stands at 65, as is demonstrated in the table below:
Table 1. Semantic primes (English exponents) (Goddard & Wierzbicka 2014)
i—me, you, someone, something—thing, people, body Substantives
kind, parts Relational substantives
this, the same, other~else Determiners
one, two, much~many, little~few, some, all Quantifiers
good, bad Evaluators
big, small Descriptors
think, know, want, don't want, feel, see, hear Mental predicates
say, words, true Speech
do, happen, move, touch Actions, events, movement, contact
be (somewhere), there is, be (someone/something), mine Location, existence, specification, possession
live, die Life and death
when~time, now, before, after, a long time, a short time, for some time, moment Time
where~place, here, above, below, far, near, side, inside Space
not, maybe, can, because, if Logical concepts
very, more Augmentor, intensifier
like~as~way Similarity
NSM research indicates that semantic primes can be combined into simple phrases and sentences, according to patterns which are shared by all languages. These combinations are called canonical sentences or combinatorial frames. The following examples are illustrative: 'something happened at this time,' 'someone was doing something for some time,' and 'people can know when it happened.'
NSM linguists use combinatorial frames to build larger text-like structures called explications. An explication is an elaborate definition of a certain concept or grammatical structure. It states the meaning of this concept or structure in a simple, universal language. In this paper, I will provide an explication of each of the different Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions.
Different NSM researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of NSM in uncovering the relationship between a verbal form and its linguistic behavior, especially when it comes to the category of aspect. To give but two examples,
Wierzbicka (2002) and Gladkova (2008: 36-114) have used semantic primes in the analysis of the Polish and Russian categories of aspect, respectively.
4. Analysis
In this section, I present the Jish Arabic past and present tense-aspect constructions while referring to their English counterparts. As has been mentioned above, the English constructions are used as a familiar point of reference. This does not make the presentation prone to Anglocentrism, because, in the end, each Jish Arabic construction is explicated using a simple, universal language.
4.1. Jish Arabic past tense-aspect constructions
4.1.1. Vpfv (¿J-<Hr): Jish Arabic counterpart of English past simple
Jish Arabic uses the perfective form to talk about an action that began and ended in the past, usually at a definite time. Thus it is the equivalent of English past simple. The following example is illustrative:
(1) ^jlj* A^Uill JSi ^¿il^
sandi akal it-tuffaha mberih
Sandy eat(3SG.M.PFV) DEF-apple yesterday 'Sandy ate the apple yesterday.'
There does not seem to be any semantic difference between the Jish Arabic tense-aspect construction and its English counterpart, and both can be explicated as follows:
(A) Someone "imil 'did' something (X) [activity verb, e.g. ara 'read' or akal 'eat']
a. Sometime before now, something happened in one place
b. People can know when it happened
c. It was like this:
i. Someone was doing something in that place for some time as this someone wanted
(B) Someone "imil 'did' something (X) [done-in-a-moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. Sometime before now, something happened in one place
b. People can know when it happened
c. It was like this:
i. Someone did something in that place in one moment as this someone wanted
(C) Someone "imil 'did' something (X) [accomplishment verb, e.g. tarak 'leave' ]
a. Sometime before now, something happened in one place
b. People can know when it happened
c. It was like this:
i. Someone did something in that place because this someone wanted something to happen
ii. This thing happened as this someone wanted
A few comments are in order. First, component (a) of each explication has the semantic primes before now because some languages (like Malay) do not encode the time of action morphologically but instead semantically through a temporal expression. This component also specifies that the action happened in one place, as actions of this kind are normally spatially localized.
Second, component (b) states that people can know when the action took place. This is true of both Jish Arabic and English, both of which allow the specification of the time at which the action took place.
Third, component (c) states that the action took place as the agent wanted. This is true of so many verbs that refer to actions over which the agent has considerable control (cf. Goddard 2015: 4).
Fourth, the explications of done-in-a-moment verbs have to include the semantic primes in one moment because these verbs depict events of very short duration. In contrast, the meanings of activity verbs involve a process (hence the need for the subcomponent 'someone was doing something for some time'), at the end of which there is a result that the doer wanted (hence the need for 'as this someone wanted'). The meanings of accomplishment verbs, on the other hand, do not focus on a process but on the end result.
4.1.2. kan 'am Vipfv / kan Vactptcl O^T):
Jish Arabic counterpart of English past progressive
To talk about a continuous action in the past, Jish Arabic uses the auxiliary verb kan 'be' followed by am (progressive marker) and the imperfective form of the main verb. The auxiliary verb kan 'be' and the main verb are conjugated for person, number, gender, and aspect. The continuous action was either in progress during a specific time in the past as in (2), or was interrupted by another action as in (3), or was simultaneous to another continuous action as in (4).
(2) JSIJ ft n< i^iajll IJA JJ—J ^JV^
mberih bi-mitil hada il-wa it kun-it am ba-kul yesterday PREP-like this(SG.M) DEF-time be-1SG.PFV PROG 1SG.IPFV-eat 'I was eating at this time yesterday.'
(3) i^l U3 JSIJ ft
kan-at am ta-kul limma ij-it
be-3SG.F.PFV PROG 2SG.IPFV-eat when come-1SG.PFV 'She was eating when I came.'
(4) < ft ijS I— JSIJ ft
kun-it am ta-kul limma kun-it am ba-naddif
be-2SG.PFV PROG 2SG.IPFV-eat when be-1 SG.PFV PROG 1 SG.IPFV-eat 'You were eating while I was cleaning.'
This tense-aspect construction is expressed in English using the past progressive; its explication is as follows:
(D) Someone kan "am yi "mil 'was doing' something (X) [activity verb, e.g. ara 'read' or akal 'eat']
a. Sometime before now, something was happening in one place for some time
b. it was like this during that time:
i. Someone was doing something (X) in that place as this someone wanted
(E) Someone kan "amyi "mil 'was doing' something (X) [done-in-a-moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. Sometime before now, something was happening in one place for some time
b. it was like this during that time:
i. Someone did something (X) in that place in one moment as this someone wanted
ii. This someone did the same thing (X) many times
(F) Someone kan "am yi "mil 'was doing' something (X) [accomplishment verb, e.g. tarak 'leave']
a. Sometime before now, something was happening in one place for some time
b. it was like this during that time:
i. Someone was doing something (X) in that place because this someone wanted something to happen
ii. This thing was happening as this someone wanted
4.1.3. kan sar Vactptcl j1^ ¿6"): Jish Arabic counterpart of English past perfect simple
In Jish Arabic, to indicate that a certain action took place before another action or point in time in the past, the auxiliary verbs kan 'be' and sar 'become' are used followed by the active participle of the main verb. Both of the Jish Arabic auxiliary verbs are conjugated for person, number, gender, and aspect. Take the following example:
(5) A^laSil <U.j U
limma ija, kun-it sur-it m<a>kel it-tuffaha
When come(3SG.M.PFV) be-1SG.PFV become-1SG.PFV eat<ACTPTCL> DEF-apple 'When he came, I had eaten the apple.'
This tense-aspect construction seems to be semantically the same as the past perfect simple in English.
The explications of the three types of verbs when used in the grammatical construction kan sar Vactptcl are as follows:
(G) Someone kan sar "amil 'had done' something (X) when something (Y)
happened [activity verb, e.g. ara 'read' or akal 'eat']
a. Sometime before now, something (Y) happened in one place
b. People can know when it happened
c. Before it happened, it was like this:
i. Someone was doing something (X) in that place for some time as this someone wanted
d. When this thing (Y) happened, people could know something
(H) Someone kan sar "amil 'had done' something (X) when something (Y)
happened [done-in-a-moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. Sometime before now, something (Y) happened in one place
b. People can know when it happened
c. Before it happened, it was like this:
i. Someone did something (X) in one moment in that place as this someone wanted
d. When it happened, people could know something
(I) Someone kan sar "amil 'had done' something (X) when something (Y)
happened [accomplishment verb, e.g. tarak 'leave']
a. Sometime before now, something (Y) happened in one place
b. People can know when it happened
c. Before it happened, it was like this:
i. Someone did something (X) in that place because this someone wanted something to happen
ii. It happened as this someone wanted
d. When this thing (Y) happened, people could know something
Three comments are in order. First, of the two actions (X) and (Y), only (Y) can be described with a time expression (see component (b)). This is true of both Jish Arabic and English. Action (Y) is described using a verb in the perfective form in Jish Arabic and in the past simple in English, and both allow for the specification of time at which action (Y) took place. On the other hand, the Jish Arabic kan sar Vactptcl form and its English counterpart—past perfect simple—do not allow such a specification. In English, for instance, one can say 'I wrote a letter yesterday' but not '*I had written a letter yesterday,' and the same holds for Jish Arabic. One may claim that there is a contradiction. On the one hand, there is a specification of the time at which action (Y) happened; on the other, there is a restriction against adding a time adverb/expression to action (X). This apparent contradiction is resolved when we bear in mind that the perfect encodes an action that took place prior to the temporal reference point (at which action (Y) took place); when exactly action (Y) took place is either not known or is not in view.
Second, component (d) of each explication presents a shared feature of the English perfect and its Jish Arabic counterpart, which is their lingering relevance. Although action (X) happened before action (Y), it is deemed relevant not at the time when it occurred but at the time when action (Y) occurred (cf. Givon 2001: 296). This is why this component states that people in the place where action (Y)
took place could know something; the thing they can know can be about the person who did action (X), as in 'When I arrived, Sam had already left' (here, the speaker knows something about Sam, namely that Sam left before the speaker's arrival) or about something or someone else, as in 'By the time the firefighters arrived, the fire had burned the entire field' (here, people know something about the field, i.e. that it got entirely burned before the firefighters' arrival).
Third, the reader may wonder whether the words 'because it (Y) happened' should be added to the last component, so that it would read 'when this thing (Y) happened, people could know something because it (Y) happened.' This could be applicable to some, but certainly not all, situations. For example, if the speaker tells his friend that he was near a field that had entirely been burned when the firefighters arrived, the speaker knows about what happened to the field because he witnessed that and not because of the arrival of the firefighters. In a similar vein, the speaker's friend knows about what happened to the field because of the speaker and not because of the arrival of the firefighters.
4.1.4. kan sar-l-P^EN 'am Vipfv (O-^ ¿t>):
Jish Arabic counterpart of English past perfect progressive
The Jish Arabic tense-aspect construction kan sar-l-PoEN am Vipfv is employed to talk about a continuous or repeated action that began before and continued until another action began, as is illustrated by examples (6) and (7). It is also employed to describe states that began before another action and continued until the other action began, as is seen in example (8).
(6) J^W ft Atlui jl£ il^J l—l
limma ija, kan sar-l-i nus
when come(3SG.M.PFV) be(3SG.M.PFV) become(3SG.M.PFV)-PREP-1SG.GEN half se a am ba-kul hour PROG 1SG.IPFV-eat
'When he came, I had been eating for half an hour.'
(7) I^A J—ti i—Ija-J ft Atlui (^^j -a,J l—l
limma ija, kan sar-l-i nus
when come(3SG.M.PFV) be(3SG.M.PFV) become(3SG.M.PFV)-PREP-1SG.GEN half
se a am ba-jarrib a- mil hada il-ishi
hour PROG 1SG.IPFV-try 1SG-try this(SG.M) DEF-thing(SG.M)
'When he came, I had been trying to do this for half an hour.'
(8) AtLui jjA j-£ 4la.J l—l
limma ija, kan sar-l-i hon
when come(3SG.M.PFV) be(3SG.M.PFV) become(3SG.M.PFV)-PREP-1SG.GEN here nus se a half hour
'When he came, I had been here for half an hour.'
Note that this tense-aspect construction is expressed through the third-person singular masculine perfective form of the auxiliary verbs kan 'be' (which is not conjugated) and sar 'become' (which is conjugated for person, number, gender, and aspect, and to which the preposition -(i)l- 'to' and a pronoun in the genitive form are attached) followed by "am (the progressive marker) and the imperfective form of the main verb.
At first glance, the English past perfect progressive seems to have an exact equivalent in Jish Arabic. A closer look, however, reveals a difference. Unlike in Jish Arabic, in English, the past perfect progressive can be used for a continuous or repeated action that stopped a little before another action began. In example (9) below, it is clear that Sandy stopped his continuous action of swimming and got out of the pool only right before the speaker saw him.
(9) I knew that Sandy had been swimming in the pool because his trunks were wet.
In Jish Arabic, this sentence is expressed using the auxiliary verbs kan 'be' and "am (progressive marker) but not sar 'become.' I regard this as the Jish Arabic equivalent of English past progressive, explained in Subsection 4.1.2.
Another difference between this Jish Arabic tense-aspect construction and its English counterpart is that in Jish Arabic a specific duration of time has to be mentioned.
The meaning of kan sarlu "am ipfv(3sg.m) can be couched in NSM as follows:
(J) Someone kan sar-l-u "am yi "mil 'had been doing' something (X) for some time when something (Y) happened [activity verb, e.g. ara 'read' or akal 'eat']
a. Sometime before now, something (Y) happened in one place
b. People can know when it happened
c. Before it happened:
i. Someone was doing something (X) in that place for some time as this someone wanted
d. People in that place could know for how long
Explication (J) captures the idea that two actions/events took place, one before the other. Component (a) refers to the one that chronologically took place second, and component (b) indicates that its timing is known. Component (c) refers to the action that chronologically took place first, hence the phrase 'Before it happened', where it refers to the second action/event. The first action was continuous and was taking place as the doer wanted. Component (d) tells the reader that people can know the duration of the action (X).
Explication (K) below is identical to explication (J) above except for component (c). In explication (K), component (c) introduces a done-in-a-moment action that is repeated for some time.
(K) Someone kan sarlu "amyi "mil 'had been doing' something (X) for some time when something (Y) happened [done-in-a-moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. Sometime before now, something (Y) happened in one place
b. People can know when it happened
c. Before it happened:
i. Someone was doing something (X) in one place for some time as this someone wanted
ii. It was like this:
i. This someone did something (X) in that place in one moment
ii. For some time, this someone did this thing (X) many times
d. People in that place could know for how long
Note that accomplishment verbs cannot be used in this tense-aspect construction either in Jish Arabic or in English.
4.1.5. kan VipfV (0?-*:? ¿^T): Jish Arabic counterpart of English habitual past
To talk about habitual actions in the past, Jish Arabic uses the auxiliary verb kan 'be' and the imperfective form of the main verb, both of which are conjugated for person, number, gender, and aspect, as is exemplified in (10):
(10) C^ J^
sandT kan y-akul tuffah zaman
Sandy be(3SG.M.PFV) 3SG.M.IPFV-eat apple(PL) in.the.past 'Sandy used to eat apples in the past.'
The meaning of this tense-aspect construction can be spelled out in NSM as follows:
(L) Someone kan yi "mil 'used to do' something (X) [activity verb, e.g. ara 'read' or akal 'eat']
a. Sometime before now, it was like this for a long time:
i. Someone was doing something for some time as this someone wanted
ii. This someone often did the same thing
b. People can know that it is not like this anymore
Component (a) tells the reader that the action took place in the past and was repeated over a long period of time. The word often is a portmanteau used in NSM instead of the phrase at many times. Component (b) is necessary because a sentence in the habitual past implies that the action is not done in the present.
(M) Someone kan yi "mil 'used to do' something (X) [done-in-a-moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. Sometime before now, it was like this for a long time:
i. Someone did something in one moment, as this someone wanted
ii. This someone often did the same thing
b. People can know that it is not like this anymore
One may wonder whether or not component (a.i.) should include the words many times and read 'someone did something many times. When this someone did it, this someone did it in one moment.' After all, a sentence like 'My rabbit used to jump everywhere each time it was released from its cage' implies that the jumping was repetitive. While this is true in this case, it is not always necessarily so. Consider the sentence 'Sam used to slap me on the face each time he saw me.' This sentence means that Sam used to slap the speaker once each time he saw him. The semantic difference between the two sentences stems from the verb jump and its combination with the word everywhere.
(N) Someone kan yi mil 'used to do' something (X) [accomplishment verb, e.g. tarak 'leave']
a. Sometime before now, it was like this for a long time:
i. Someone did something because this someone wanted something to happen
ii. This thing happened as this someone wanted
iii. This someone often did the same thing
b. People can know that it is not like this anymore
It is noteworthy that, without context or a time expression indicating long duration, this tense-aspect construction—when used with done-in-a-moment and activity verbs—can refer to a continuous action in the past. In this case, its meaning is identical to that of kan am Vipfv discussed in Subsection 4.1.2.
Additionally, unlike the explications in the previous subsections, the explications in this subsection do not have the semantic primes IN this place. This is because a habitual action is not necessarily confined to one place.
4.2. Jish Arabic present tense-aspect constructions
4.2.1. VIPFV Jish Arabic counterpart of English present simple
In Jish Arabic, if the imperfective form of the verb appears without any auxiliary verb, it can convey habitual semantics, as in example (11), a fact, as in (12), or a scheduled event, as in (13). This tense-aspect construction is the Jish Arabic equivalent of English present simple.
(11) 5:00 t ^ ^
dayman ba-sbah al 5:00.
always 1 SG.IPFV-swim PREP 5:00 'I always swim at 5:00.'
(12) l^JJ -J-J jA (jinmjji -J-J1I
il-baba fransis huwwi baba roma. DEF-pope Francis 3SG.M pope Roma 'Pope Francis is the Pope of Rome.'
(13) 6:00 t OL^
li-tren bi-tla" "a 6:00
DEF-train 3SG.M.IPFV-leave PREP 6:00 'The train leaves at 6:00.'
The above examples raise the following four points about habituals and facts. First, habitual actions (he eats apples) or states (he sleeps early) repeat themselves. In the absence of adverbials (e.g., every day, almost never, sometimes or occasionally), the repetition is understood to be highly regular (at many times or at all times).
Second, every habit that exists is in the end a fact; however, not every fact is a habit. Example (12) refers to a fact—something that is true—which is not a habit.
Third, a fact can refer to an action or state that people either believe to be true (like any fact pertaining to our world) or wish to temporarily assume to be true (such as any piece of information that is mentioned in a fictional novel).
Fourth, one may be tempted to claim that all that has been mentioned here applies to the English past simple and future simple, as well as to their Jish Arabic counterparts. This is partially, but not entirely, true. A sentence like 'He always ate apples and will always do the same' refers to a habit in the past and future. The meaning of the habit, I would argue, stems from the adverb of frequency always and not from the tense-aspect construction. In the absence of adverbials expressing frequency, such a sentence would normally be understood to refer to a particular action and not to a habit.
(O) Someone byi "mil 'does' something (X) [activity verb, e.g. ara 'read' or akal 'eat']
a. People can know that it is like this at many/all times:
i. Someone is doing something for some time as this someone wants
(P) Someone byi "mil 'does' something (X) [done-in-a-moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. People can know that it is like this at many/all times:
i. Someone does something in one moment as this someone wants
(Q) Someone byi "mil 'does' something (X) [accomplishment verb, e.g. tarak 'leave' ]
a. People can know that it is like this at many/all times:
i. Someone does something because this someone wants something to happen
ii. It happens as this someone wants
Scheduled events actually refer to the future, not to the present. In addition, it carries the meaning of planning and letting other people know about the plan. The meaning of planning involves deciding to do something, the explication of which is as follows:
(R) someone byi mil 'does' something X after now
a. Sometime before now, someone thought like this for some time:
i. 'I want to do something (X) after now
ii. I want other people to know this' a. Because of it, people can know this:
i. 'this someone will do this thing (X) after now'
4.2.2. 'am Vipfv and Vactptcl (Os* Jish Arabic counterpart of English present progressive
In English, the progressive aspect of the present tense is formed by am/is/are with the present participle of the verb and is employed to refer to an action that is happening at the time of speaking or around the time of speaking, as in (14) and (15). It is also used to talk about planned events in the future, as in (16).
(14) She is speaking to you now.
(15) I am studying English this year.
(16) We are coming for dinner this evening.
Examples (17)-(19) are rendered in Jish Arabic as follows:
(17) l^J ft
am ti-hki ma -ak issa
PROG 3SG.F.IPFV-speak PREP-2SG.M now 'She is speaking to you now.'
(18) 4-iuilI ^jjl^jJ fitij ft
am ba-t allam inglizi hay is-sinni PROG 1SG.IPFV-study English this(SG.F) DEF-year 'I am studying English this year.'
(19) fjjlI l^klc. jjjU lm
ihna j<a>yy-in a=l- asha il-yom il-masa
1PL come<ACTPTCL>-PL.M PREP=DEF-dinner DEF-day DEF-evening 'We are coming for dinner this evening.'
Examples (17) and (18) demonstrate two facts. First, the English present progressive is rendered in Jish Arabic through the progressive marker am and the imperfective form of the main verb (which is conjugated for person, number, and gender). Second, the English present progressive and its Jish Arabic counterpart are used to talk about an action that is taking place at or around the time of speaking. However, unlike English am/is/are +Ving, the Jish Arabic progressive marker am and the imperfective form of the main verb cannot be used to talk about planned events in the future. To express a planned event in Jish Arabic, the active participle form of the verb and a future time expression are employed, as is seen in example (19) above.
Here are the explications of the actions taking place at the time of speech:
(S) Someone "am yi "mil 'is doing' something (X) now [activity verb, e.g. ara 'read' or akal 'eat']
a. Something is happening in one place now
b. It is like this:
i. Someone is doing something (X) in that place for some time as this someone wants
(T) Someone "am yi "mil 'is doing' something (X) now [done-in-a-moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. Something is happening in one place now
b. It is like this:
i. Someone does something (X) in that place in one moment as this someone wants
ii. This someone does the same thing (X) many times
(U) Someone "am yi "mil 'is doing' something (X) now [accomplishment verb, e.g. tarak 'leave']
a. Something is happening in one place now
b. It is like this:
i. Someone is doing something (X) in that place because this someone wants something to happen
ii. It happens as this someone wants
Here are the explications of planned future actions:
(V) Someone "amil 'is doing' something after now [activity verb, e.g. ara 'read' or akal 'eat' ]
a. Sometime before now, someone thought like this for some time: i. 'sometime after now, I want to do something for some time'
b. Because of it, this someone can think like this now:
i. 'I know this: I will do this thing sometime after now'
(W) Someone "amil 'is doing' something after now [done-in-a-moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. Sometime before now, someone thought like this for some time: i. 'I want to do something in one moment sometime after now'
b. Because of this, this someone can think like this now:
i. 'I know this: I will do this thing sometime after now'
(X) Someone "amil 'is doing' something after now [accomplishment verb, e.g. tarak 'leave']
a. Sometime before now, someone thought like this for some time: i. 'I want to do something sometime after now'
b. Because of it, this someone can think like this now:
i. 'I know this: I will do this thing sometime after now'
In the three explications (V)-(X), component (a) is about the past. It refers to a process of deciding and planning that took place before the time of speaking. In this process, the speaker thought about what they wanted to do and chose to do it.
Component (b) refers to the time of speaking whereby the speaker says that they will execute the scheduled event.
It is worth noting that, with some verbs, such as the Jish Arabic counterparts of English live and sleep—and in the absence of a future time expression—the active participle of these verbs refers to a state in the present, as in Example (20) and (22), and not to a future planned event. If these verbs are in the imperfective and are preceded by the progressive marker, their meanings change. It is not clear what these verbs have in common. Compare:
(20) jjA Ui
ana "<a>yish hon
1SG.NOM live<ACTPTCL>(SG.M) here 'I live/am living here.'
(21) ^ Ul
ana "am ba- "Tsh hali si "bi
1SG.NOM PROG 1SG.IPFV-live situation difficult 'I am going through a difficult situation.'
(22) jA
huwwi n<a>yim 3SG.M.NOM sleep<ACTPTCL>(SG.M) 'He is sleeping/asleep'
(23) fUj ^ jA
huwwi "am bi-nam
3SG.M.NOM PROG IPFV-sleep 'He is falling asleep.'
In (20) and (22), the active participle of Jish Arabic "ash 'live' and nam 'sleep' refer to living and sleeping, respectively. On the other hand, in (21) and (23), the progressive marker "am and the imperfective form of "ash 'live' and nam 'sleep' mean 'going through' and 'falling asleep' respectively.
While the reader may agree that "ayish 'living' and "am ba "Tsh 'going through' are semantically different, they may question the semantic difference between nayim 'sleeping' and "am binam 'falling asleep.' To clarify the matter, consider the following two sentences huwwi "am bina "ib ilhamidissa 'He is picking the lemons now' and huwwi mna "ib ilhamidbukra 'He is picking the lemons tomorrow.' Both refer to the same process of picking, although this process is taking place at different times; in the first sentence, the process is taking place at the time of speaking while, in the second sentence, it will take place on the following day. The same does not go for the sentences huwwi nayim 'He is sleeping now' and huwwi "am binam 'He is falling asleep,' as the former refers to a state while the latter to a process.
4.2.3. sar ^actptcl (O?^ jM:
Jish Arabic counterpart of English present perfect simple
The present perfect simple is used in English to talk about an action that happened in the past but has an effect on the present, such as in the sentence "I have eaten, and therefore, I am not hungry." Jish Arabic does not have the equivalent of have done X (as it is the same as did X), but it does have the equivalent of have already done X. Put differently, the sentences 'I ate' and 'I have eaten' are rendered in Jish Arabic in exactly the same way using the perfective form of the verb. However, 'I have already eaten' is expressed differently. Compare:
(24) ^Ki
akal-it it-tuffaha eat-1 SG.PFV DEF-apple 'I ate/have eaten the apple.'
(25) ^Uijl
sur-it m<a>kel it-tuffaha
become-1SG.PFV eat<ACTPTCL>(SG.M) DEF-apple 'I have already eaten the apple.'
As can be seen from example (25), Jish Arabic uses the auxiliary verb sar 'become' and the active participle of the main verb to convey the idea that something has already happened. The auxiliary verb sar 'become' is conjugated for person, number, gender, and aspect, while the main verb is conjugated for number and gender only. Like English have done, Jish Arabic sar amil 'have done' cannot be followed by a time expression.
The meaning of this tense-aspect construction can be spelled out as follows:
(Y) Someone sar amil 'has already done' something (X) [activity verb, e.g.
ara 'read' or akal 'eat']
a. Sometime before now, it was like this:
i. Someone was doing something for some time as this someone wanted
b. Because of this, people can know something
(Z) Someone sar amil 'has already done' something (X) [done-in-a-
moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. Sometime before now, it was like this:
i. Someone did something in one moment as this someone wanted
b. Because of this, people can know something
(AA) Someone sar amil 'has already done' something (X) [accomplishment verb, e.g. tarak 'leave']
a. Sometime before now, it was like this:
i. Someone did something because this someone wanted something to happen
ii. It happened as this someone wanted
b. Because of this, people can know something
Component (b) of each explication aims to convey the idea that this tense-aspect construction implies something that the addressee can know. Think of English I have eaten (which implies that the speaker does not want to eat anymore) or I have watched the movie many times (which implies that the speaker likes this movie); in both cases, the addressee understands the implied information because of the English tense-aspect construction. The same goes for the Jish Arabic form. Note that what the addressee can know can be about the speaker or about someone or something else. If, say, Elizabeth asks Sandy where her bag is, and Sandy answers 'I have put it in the car,' Elizabeth knows something about the bag, i.e. that it is now in the car.
4.2.4. sdr-i-PsEN 'am Vipfv ^JJM:
Jish Arabic counterpart of English present perfect progressive
To talk about an action that started in the past and continues into the present, Jish Arabic employs the following components: (1) the third-person singular masculine perfective form of the auxiliary verb sar 'become,' (2) the preposition -(i)l- 'to' and a pronoun in the genitive form, (3) the progressive marker "am, and (4) the imperfective aspect of the main verb (which is conjugated for person, number, gender, and aspect). This is the Jish Arabic equivalent of the English present perfect progressive. Here are three examples:
sar-il-kun khamis si -at "am ti-hdar-u
become(3SG.M.PFV)-PREP-2PL.GEN five hour-PL.F PROG 2lPFV-watch-PL il-filim DEF-film
'You have been watching the movie for five hours.'
(27) A^l^ill jjA lil^^
sar-l-a hon min is-se"a khamsi
become(3SG.M.PFV)-PREP-3SG.F.GEN here PREP DEF-hour five 'She has been here since five o'clock.'
(28) lil^j l^l j ' ^ lilj^
sar-il-na "am ni-hdar il-filim min
become(3 SG.M.PFV)-PREP-1 PL .GEN PROG 1PL.IPFV-watch DEF-film PREP limma wsil-it when arrive-2SG.M.PFV
'We have been watching the movie since you arrived.'
As can be seen from example (26), Jish Arabic does not use a word which is the equivalent of English for to indicate a period of time. Also, as is seen from examples (27) and (28), like English since, the Jish Arabic preposition min is used to indicate a point in time when the action started. When this preposition is followed by a verb, as in example (28), the verb is in the perfective aspect, akin to English, in which the verb that comes in the since-clause is in the past simple.
The meaning of this tense-aspect construction can be spelled out as follows:
(BB) Someone sarlu am yi mil 'has been doing' something (X) for some
time [activity verb, e.g. ara 'read' or akal 'eat']
a. Something is happening in one place now
b. It is like this now:
i. someone is doing something for some time in one place as this someone wants
c. before now, it was like this for some time in this place all the time
d. People in this place can know for how long
(CC) Someone sarlu am yi mil 'has been doing' something (X) for some
time [done-in-a-moment verb, e.g. takh 'shoot']
a. Something is happening in one place now
b. It is like this:
i. Someone does something (X) in that place in one moment as this someone wants
ii. This someone does the same thing (X) many times
c. before now, it was like this for some time in this place all the time
d. People in this place can know for how long
Like in English, in Jish Arabic, accomplishment verbs cannot be used in this tense-aspect construction. Note that English die can be used in the present perfect progressive, but its Jish Arabic equivalent mat cannot; instead, Jish Arabic uses the verb naza' 'be dying.'
5. Discussion
This study has made two main contributions. First, it contributes to the field of theoretical linguistics (especially morphology, syntax, and semantics) as it uncovers the tense-aspect constructions in a language variety whose tenses and aspects have not been studied before. It also explicates the meaning of each tense-aspect construction in simple, universal terms. This makes the explications easily understood and readily translatable into any language.
Second, it contributes to the field of applied linguistics, and mainly to teaching English as a foreign language. In addition to bringing to light the Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions, it compares them to their English counterparts. The results show that the two sets share some similarities but also some differences. On the relationship between cross-linguistic similarities and pedagogy, Ringbom and Jarvis (2009: 114) remark that:
given the important role that cross-linguistic similarities play in language learning, a natural question to follow is whether and to what extent they could be put to effective use in teaching. In general terms, a good strategy would be to make use of, and even overuse, actual similarities at early stages of learning.
If the EFL teacher in Jish is aware of these similarities and resorts to them while teaching his or her students, the latter are bound to benefit. These similarities are summarized in the following table:
Table 2. English tense-aspect constructions and their Jish Arabic counterparts
Tense-aspect construction English Jish Arabic
Past simple He V2 vpfv(3sg.m)
Past progressive He was Ving kan 'am V,pfv(3sg.m) ¿t?
Past perfect simple He had V3 kan sar Vactptcl(sg.m)
Past perfect progressive He had been Ving kan sarlu 'am V,pfv(3sg.m) ¿U-JLJ (ÔJP AÎJJL^ ¿ïT
Habitual past He used to V kan Vipfv(3sg.m)
Present simple He Vi-s Vipfv(3sg.m)
Present progressive He is Ving am Vipfv(3sg.m)
Present perfect simple He has (already) V3 sar vactptcl(sg.m) Jjilc jl^
Present perfect progressive He has been Ving sarlu 'am^ Vipfv№g.m)
In addition, this study can be of interest and benefit to non-native Arabic speakers who wish to study Jish Arabic or any Arabic variety that is linguistically very close to it.
I hypothesize that what goes for Jish Arabic with regard to tenses and aspects also goes for some other Arabic dialects but not for all of them. For example, Brustad (2000: 150) points out that the use of the auxiliary verb kan 'to be' is common in Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian, and Kuwaiti Arabic, while the progressive marker am is used in Syrian and Egyptian Arabic but not in Moroccan and Kuwaiti Arabic. Alshihry (2017: 87) goes further to point out that the "semantic meanings associated with this form [i.e., am] are not exactly the same in every dialect. For instance, this form is attested in Egyptian Arabic as an intensifying progressive marker..., and this intensifying function is not prominent in modern Levantine dialects." Exactly which dialects are like Jish Arabic and which are not requires further investigation.
It is worth noting that studies on Arabic varieties tend to focus on the macro-linguistic level, i.e. they target an Arabic variety that is claimed to cover a whole nation (such as Lebanese Arabic, Egyptian Arabic, and Moroccan Arabic). The present study, on the other hand, is at the micro-linguistic level. It investigates the Arabic variety of one small town that is part of the wider Arabic-speaking world. I argue that the micro-linguistic level provides more specificity and, in some cases, more accuracy.
Working at the macro-linguistic level means covering a vast geographical area with numerous people. Although these people may live in the same country (say Iraq), they belong to different communities, and each community lives in a certain area and has its own Arabic variety. There is no question that the Arabic varieties that are geographically adjacent to each other are very similar to each other. At the same time, they are not identical, neither phonologically nor semantically, morphologically or syntactically (Albirini, Benmamoun & Saadah 2011: 275). Two examples can be illustrative. Fassuta is an Arabic-speaking town that is about 20 kilometers from Jish. Despite its relative closeness to Jish and even though Fassuta Arabic and Jish Arabic are very similar to each other, one cannot fail to notice some phonological and semantic variations; for example, in final position, the close front unrounded vowel [i] in Jish Arabic is pronounced as the open-mid unrounded vowel [e] in Fassuta Arabic. The word for sheep is kharuf in Jish Arabic but "abur in Fassuta Arabic. Kufr al-Labad is a small town in the West Bank, and it is about 140 kilometers from Jish. In this town the word ka id (the active participle of ka "ad 'sat') can be used as a locative copula as in the sentence makka kaidi fT al-sa "udiyya 'Mecca is in Saudi Arabic' (Camilleri & Sadler 2019: 18); in Jish Arabic, its equivalent, i.e. a id, cannot be used as a copula.
This being so, it is hoped that this study will trigger other studies of the same type in which the Arabic "micro-varieties" of individual communities (especially those regarded as belonging to the same macro-variety) are investigated. This will enable microscopic comparisons of these varieties and will make the similarities and differences between them more prominent.
6. Conclusion
This paper has investigated the Jish Arabic tense-aspect constructions and provided an explication of each form. The explications use a simple, universal language; their simplicity makes them easily understandable, and their universality makes them readily translatable into any language. This, in turn, makes their meanings accessible to everyone. Additionally, this paper has demonstrated that these forms have equivalents in English. This matter can be of considerable importance to the area of EFL teaching and learning, especially as similarities can lead to positive transfer. Positive transfer, in turn, can facilitate the learning process. As Arabic varieties that are geographically adjacent to each other are highly mutually intelligible and are similar to each other, it can be argued that what goes for Jish Arabic goes also for the Arabic varieties that are adjacent to it. That said, further investigation needs to be carried out.
Acknowledgements
I am indebted to Prof. Anna Wierzbicka and Prof. Cliff Goddard for the time and energy they invested in reading and discussing earlier versions of this paper and the invaluable input they provided. I also thank the two anonymous reviewers of RJL, as well as Dr. Joseph Habib, for their constructive feedback.
REFERENCES
Al-Saleemi, Elham. 1987. A Contrastive study of the verb systems of English and Arabic. M.A. Thesis. Durham: Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7065/ (assessed 25 May 2023)
Alasmari, Jawhara, Janet C. E. Watson & Eric Atwell. 2018. A contrastive study of the Arabic and English verb tense and aspect: A corpus-based approach. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Scienecs 3 (3). 1604-1615.
Albirini, Abdulkafi, Elabbas Benmamoun & Eman Saadah. 2011. Grammatical features of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic heritage speakers' oral production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33 (2). 273-303.
Alsaif, Ebtisam A. 2017. Tense and aspect in translation from Arabic into English: Azazeel by Youssef Ziedan as a case study. Arab World English Journal 1 (1). 127-43.
Alshartuni, Rashid. 1969. Mabadi' Al-"arabiyyat [Arabic Language Principles]. 12th ed. Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq.
Alshihry, Mona A. 2017. Durative aspect markers in modern Arabic dialects: Crossdialectal functions and historical development. Ph.D. Thesis. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
Aoun, E. Joseph, Elabbas Benmamoun & Lina Choueiri. 2010. The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bahloul, Maher. 2007. Structure and Function of the Arabic Verb. London: Routledge.
Bromhead, Helen & Zhengdao Ye. 2020. Meaning, Life and Culture: In Conversation with Anna Wierzbicka. Canberra: ANU Press.
Brustad, Kristen E. 2000. The Syntax of Spoken Arabic: A Comparative Study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian, and Kuwaiti Dialects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Bruweleit, Stefan. 2015. Aspect, Tense and Action in the Arabic Dialect of Beirut. Leiden/ Boston: Brill.
Bukhdud, Ali. 1987. Almadkhal Alnahawi [Introduction to Arabic Syntax]. Beirut: al-muassasat al-jamiiyyat lil-dirasat.
Camilleri, Maris & Louisa Sadler. 2019. The grammaticalisation of a copula in vernacular Arabic. Glossa 4 (1). 1-33.
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, David. 1997. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Langauge. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Declerck, Renaat. 2015. Tense in English: Its Structure and Use in Discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2012. Basic Linguistic Theory: Further Grammatical Topics. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dray, Marcelle, Jean Koren, Tami Ronen & Jack Baum. 1993. Grammar in Focus: A Comprehensive Grammar Review. Raanana: Eric Cohen Books.
Eisele, John C. 1999. Arabic Verbs in Time: Tense and Aspect in Cairene Arabic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Fakhouri, Hanna. 1986. TarTkh Al-Adab Al- "arabT: Al-Adab Al-QadTm [A History of the Arabic Literature: Ancient Literature]. Beirut: Dar Jubail.
Fayyad, Soliman. 1997. Azminat Al-Fi "l Al- "arabTAl-Nahawiyyah: Arba "ata "ashara Zamanan [Grammatical Tenses of the Arabic Verb: Fourteen Tenses]. Beirut: Dar al-Mustaqbal al-arabi.
Gadallah, Hassan H. A. 2006. Translating English perfect tenses into Arabic: A comparative study of two translations of Pearl Buck's novel. Babel 52 (3). 243-261.
Gadallah, Hassan H. A. 2017. Translating Tenses in Arabic-English and English-Arabic
Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Givon, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. Vol. I. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Gladkova, Anna. 2008. Russian Emotions, attitudes and values: Selected topics in cultural semantics. Ph.D. dissertation. Canberra: Australian National University.
Gladkova, Anna. 2010. Russian Cultural Semantics: Emotions, Values, Attitudes. Moscow: Languages of Slavonic Cultures.
Gladkova, Anna & Tatiana Larina. 2018. Anna Wierzbicka, Words and the World. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (3). 499-520. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-3-499-520
Goddard, Cliff. 2008a. Cross-Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goddard, Cliff. 2008b. Towards a systematic table of semantic elements. In Cliff Goddard (ed.), Cross-Linguistic semantics, 59-81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goddard, Cliff. 2015. Verb classes and valency alternations (NSM approach), with special reference to English physical activity verbs. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Case studies from Austronesia, the Pacific, the Americas, and theoretical outlook, 1671-1702. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Goddard, Cliff. 2018. Minimal English and how it can add to global English. In Cliff Goddard (ed.), Minimal English for a global world: Improved communication using fewer words, 5-27. Cham: Palgrave.
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka (eds). 1994. Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka (eds). 2002a. Meaning and Universal Grammar - Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka. 2002b. Semantic primes and universal grammar. In Cliff Goddard & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Meaning and universal grammar - theory and empirical findings, 41-85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka. 2014. Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goddard, Cliff, Anna Wierzbicka & Gian Marco Farese. 2022. The conceptual semantics of 'money' and 'money verbs.' Russian Journal of Linguistics 26 (1). 7-30.
Green, Ronald. 1995. High School Grammar: A Pedagogical Grammar of English. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.
Habib, Sandy. 2011. Contrastive lexical-conceptual analysis of folk religious concepts in Arabic, Hebrew, and English: NSM approach. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Armidale: University of New England.
Habib, Sandy. 2021. On the universality of good, bad, big, and small. International Journal of Arabic Linguistics 7 (1). 51-60.
Holes, Clive. 2004. Modern Arabic: Structures, Functions, and Varieties. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Holes, Clive. 2018. Introduction. In Clive Holes (ed.), Arabic historical dialectology: Linguistic andsociolinguistic approaches, 1-28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kroeger, Paul. 2005. Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levisen, Carsten. 2012. Cultural Semantics and Social Cognition: A Case Study on the Danish Universe of Meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Malik, Abu Abdalla. 2007 [13th cen.]. Alfiyyat Ibin Malik [the 1000 Verses of Ibin Malik], Riyadh: Dar al-Minhaj.
Mohammad, Mahmoud Dawood. 1982. The Semantics of Tense and Aspect in English and Modern Standard Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Moshref, Ola Ahmed. 2012. Corpus Study of Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Diglossic Speech in Cairene Arabic. Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Mudhsh, Badri Abdulhakim DM. 2021. A comparative study of tense and aspect categories in Arabic and English. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1899568 Murphy, Raymond. 2019. English Grammar in Use. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peeters, Bert (ed.). 2006. Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical Evidence from
Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Ringbom, Hakan & Scott Jarvis. 2009. The importance of cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. In Michael H. Long & Catherine J. Doughty (eds.), The handbook of language teaching, 106-118. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Rozakis, Aurie. 2003. English Grammar for the Utterly Confused. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Ryding, Karin C. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. Sibawayh, Omar. 1988 [8th cen.]. Al-Kitab [The Book]. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khanji. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1972. Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaum. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1980. Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2002. Semantic primes and universal grammar in Polish. In Cliff Goddard & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.), Meaning and universal grammar: Theory and empirical findings. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Wierzbicka, Anna. 2021. "Semantic Primitives", fifty years later. Russian Journal of
Linguistics 25 (2). 317-342. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-2-317-342 Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Article history:
Received: 18 December 2022 Accepted: 15 April 2023
Bionote:
Sandy HABIB is a linguist and a Catholic priest. He is a Senior Lecturer at the English Teacher Education Program at Tel-Hai Academic College, Israel. In addition, he is the parish priest of St. Maroun's Church in Jish, which belongs to the Maronite Archdiocese of Haifa and the Holy Land.
e-mail: mhsandy3@gmail.com, havivsan@m.telhai.ac.il https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-5361
Сведения об авторе:
Сэнди ХАБИБ - лингвист и католический священник. Он работает старшим преподавателем в программе подготовки учителей английского языка Академического колледжа Тель-Хаи (Израиль). Кроме того, он является приходским священником в церкви Св. Марун в Джише, принадлежащей к Архиепархии Хайфы и Святой Земли. e-mail: mhsandy3@gmail.com, havivsan@m.telhai.ac.il https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-5361
