CC BY
30
Проблема onpimeHHM води актуальна для бага-тьох крат ceimy. Найбшьш перспективними для демтерал1зацп можна вважати мембранн техно -логи. Для стабiлiзацiйноi обробки води перед подачею на мембранн фтьтри використовували юно-обмгнне пом'якшеннярозчину на слабокислотному катмнМ DOWEX MAC-3 в H+ i Na+ формах. Це дозволяв пгдвищити ефективнсть баромембран-ного знесолення та термт експлуатацп мембран. Нанофшьтрацшна мембрана ОПМН-П забезпечуе очищення низькомтералйованих вод вгд сульфа-тiв (на 74-93 %) та ютв жорсткостi (67-90 %), при цьому мембрана мае низьку селективтсть по гiдрокарбонат-анiонах i не затримуе хлориди. Це дозволяв уникнути накопичення даних анютв в концентратах при нанофшьтрацтному очищенн низькомiнералiзованих вод. Зворотньоосмотична мембрана Filmtec TW30-1812-50 мае селективтсть по сульфатам та юнам жорсткостi понад 99 %. Селективтсть по хлоридам стано-вить 83-94 % для низькомiнералiзованих вод та 90-95 % для високомiнералiзованих. Концентрати м^тять юни жорсткостi, сульфати, хлориди та ггдрокарбонат атони в значних концентра-щях, Визначено умови ефективного пом'якшення утворених концентратiв при комплекснш оброб-ц вапном та алюмШевими коагулянтами. При знесоленй концентрату низько- та високомте-ралiзованих вод концентрация сульфатiв знизи-лась до 2,55-6,53 мг-екв/дм3 та 3,31-9,02мг-екв/ дм3 вiдповiдно. При цьому концентрация ютв жор-сткостi становила 3,31-9,02 мг-екв/дм3 i 4,2010,65 мг-екв/дм3. Створення комплексних тех-нологт очищення мiнералiзованих вод дозволяв забезпечити належну ефективтсть опрiснення води та переробити утворен вгдходи з отриман-ням корисних продуктiв. Це дозволить зменшити антропогенный тиск на навколишне природне сере-довище та виршити проблему дефщиту пр^ног води для населения та промисловостi
Ключовi слова: мiнералiзованi води, нанофшь-тращя, зворотнш осмос, селективтсть, продук-тивтсть, сульфати, юни жорсткостi
UDC 628.168.3
|öOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2020.206443|
TECHNOLOGY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE DESALINATION OF WASTEWATER FROM
MINES
I. Trus
PhD, Associate Professor* E-mail: inna.trus.m@gmail.com N. Gomelya
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department*
E-mail: m.gomelya@kpi.ua V. Halysh PhD, Associate Professor* E-mail: v.galysh@gmail.com I. Radovenchyk PhD, Associate Professor* E-mail: r.yar@ukr.net O. Stepova PhD, Associate Professor Department of Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic» Pershotravnevyi ave., 24, Poltava, Ukraine, 36011 E-mail: alenastepovaja@gmail.com O. Levytska PhD, Associate Professor Department of Life Safety Oles Honchar Dnipro National University Gagarina ave., 72, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010 E-mail: LLevi@ukr.net *Department of Ecology and Technology of Plant Polymers National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute" Peremohy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056
Received date 20.03.2020 Accepted date 17.06.2020 Published date 30.30.2020
Copyright © 2020,I. Trus, N. Gomelya, V. Halysh, I. Radovenchyk, O. Stepova, O. Levytska
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
1. Introduction
Globalization, the rapid development of industry, improvement of cultural and living conditions, as well as several other factors, lead to complicated issues related to environmental pollution. The increased needs by the population and industry for clean water predetermine the interest of states and scientists in finding a solution to this problem. The limited freshwater resources predetermine the relevance of a water purification issue in order to obtain high-quality drinking water for people and technical water for the industry.
The main sources of water reservoirs contamination are the discharge of insufficiently purified wastewater from industrial and communal enterprises. A large source of water pollution is the dumping of significant volumes of water from mines [1]. This leads to the contamination of surface water objects with substances contained in water from mines. Water from mines contains high concentrations of sulfates and hardness ions. Such water bodies are characterized by increased levels of mineralization and hardness. At a concentration of sulfate over 1,000 pmm, there are negative consequences. In addition, the high concentrations of sulfate cause the release of phosphates from sediments, which
potentially leads to eutrophication [2]. As a result, contaminated surface waters cause environmental and material losses. Consequently, it becomes apparent that mineralized wastewater must be subjected to proper cleaning. Based on the environmental safety requirements, all mineralized waters must be desalinated before being discharged into open water reservoirs.
To implement the environmentally safe industrial water consumption, it is necessary to develop low-waste technology of water desalination. Therefore, it is a relevant task to study the creation of technologies for the comprehensive purification of mineralized water, which would ensure the proper efficiency of water desalination and could process the waste formed, with obtaining useful products.
2. Literature review and problem statement
To reduce the shortage of freshwater and to reduce anthropogenic pressure on the environment, it is necessary to implement appropriate technologies for the purification of mineralized waters. There are many methods to purify mineralized wastewater, which include reagents-based, ion-exchange, membrane, electrochemical, biological, and others. The authors of [3] compared different methods to purify water from sulfates. It is shown that in the purification of water with the original concentration of sulfates 1,400, 700, 350, and 20 mg/dm3, the most effective was the reverse osmosis.
Paper [4] investigates the application of ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, membrane distillation, and integrated membrane processes to produce technological water from natural waters or industrial drains. It is shown that at prolonged filtering there is the formation of salt deposits. This leads to a decrease in the service life of membranes and increases the cost of the cleaning process.
The authors of work [5] applied, for the treatment of water from mines, the nano-filtering, and inverse osmotic membranes, and the efficiency of sulfate extraction was 97 % and 99 %, respectively. The efficacy of the extraction of copper, aluminum, iron, and manganese for both membranes did not exceed 95 %.
Work [6] reported a designed membrane that has potential use in the coal industry for the reuse of water, the processing of tails, pre-treatment of water before reverse osmosis.
It is shown in [7] that the application of pre-filtering at nanofiltration and reverse osmosis is appropriate from an environmental and economic point of view. The efficiency of the nanofiltration process is 90 % and 95 % for NaCl and Na2SO4, respectively.
The high price, the necessity to develop methods of brine processing, preliminary processing of solutions before feeding to membranes are the main issues for achieving the efficient cleaning of water from mines [8].
Thus, membrane technologies have a significant disadvantage [3-8]. The result of reverse osmotic treatment is the large volumes of concentrates, characterized by the elevated concentration of sulfates and hardness ions.
The concentration of dissolved solids in brine is from 20,000 to 35,000 mg/dm3, so it is quite expensive to process it and dispose of it [9].
To recycle the concentrates from baromembrane purification, it is proposed to use the biological reduction of sulfate to sulfur [3]. The main disadvantage of a given method is the high sensitivity of biological methods. In addition, at the de-
salination of mineralized waters, the concentrate, in addition to sulfates, contains a considerable amount of hardness ions.
Paper [10] uses lime to clean and soften water. A given method is quite simple and cheap. However, this method of wastewater treatment does not make it possible to reduce the sulfate concentration by less than 1,500 mg/dm3, due to the solubility of gypsum, at a sanitary norm of 250-500 mg/dm3 for drinking water and >100 mg/dm3 for fish farms.
Article [11] investigates the processes of water purification by sulfates when processing with lime, sodium aluminate. The disadvantage of sodium aluminate is the large values of residual water alkalinity. In addition, to align the pH of solutions, they must be treated with carbon dioxide.
Comprehensive technology for the purification of mineralized water was offered in paper [12]. Cleaning the baromembrane desalination concentrates was carried out by treating samples with lime and 2/3 of aluminum hy-droxochloride. The paper shows that at a dose of coagulant of 7.82 mmol/dm3 and consumption of lime of 134.0 mg-equiv./dm3, it was possible to reduce sulfate concentration to 2.7 mg-equiv./dm3. The residual alkalinity of water increases with an increased lime consumption but decreases while increasing the dose of the coagulant, which contributes to water acidification. The main drawback of a given process is significant secondary contamination of water by chlorides.
Mineralization of coal-mining waters varies from 1-3 to 20-30 g/dm3. Therefore, our research is aimed at the desalination of weakly and highly mineralized waters for obtaining drinking water for people or technical water for the needs of the industry. The research also aims to resolve a complex unresolved issue - the disposal of the concentrates with a high chloride content.
3. The aim and objectives of the study
The aim of this study is to create a technology to treat wastewater from mines, with varying levels of mineralization, to produce freshwater for people and industrial enterprises, taking into consideration the issues related to processing the formed salt solutions into target products.
To accomplish the aim, the following tasks have been set:
- to determine conditions for the ion-exchange softening of water with different levels of mineralization to improve the efficiency of water baromembrane desalination process and prolong the service time of membranes;
- to assess the effects of mineral salt concentration in solutions on the effectiveness of their desalination depending on the solution characteristics;
- to define parameters for processing the baromembrane water purification concentrates while obtaining useful products.
4. Methods for estimating the baromembrane and reagent purification of mineralized water
To desalinate mineralized water from mines, we used the nano-filtration membrane OPMN-P and the reverse osmosis low-pressure membrane Filmtec TW30-1812-50. To determine the process efficiency, we used a low-mineralized solution, close in composition to water, from the city of To-retsk: C(SO4-)=15.0 mg-equiv./dm3, H=10.3 mg-equiv./dm3, ^=4.6 mg-equiv./dm3, C(Cl-)=3.1 mg-equiv./dm3, pH=
=8.47. And a highly mineralized solution (from the mine Kreminna, Donetsk oblast): C(S04-)=32.0 mg-equiv./dm3, H=58.9 mg-equiv./dm3, ,4=18.7 mg-equiv./dm3, C(Cl-)= =500.0 mg-equiv./dm3, pH=6.53. Concentrated solutions containing NaCl in concentrations over 30 % are practically not softened on strong acidic cations. Therefore, for the stabilizing treatment of water relative to the carbonate deposits, the ion exchange softening of this solution was used based on the weakly acidic cation exchanger DOWEX MAC-3 in the H+ and Na+ forms. After that, the filtrate was fed to the baromembrane purification.
The solution was poured into a cell of 1.0 dm3 with a membrane area of 113.04 cm2 at nanofiltration desalination. The operating pressure was 0.40 MPa because this pressure provides for sufficiently high process performance. The samples of permeate of 100 cm3 were selected. The degree of permeate selection varied from 10 to 70 %.
At reverse osmosis water desalination, we poured a solution of 10 dm3. The operating pressure was 0.40 MPa. The stopwatch registered the time of selecting 1 dm3 of the permeate. The degree of permeate selection varied from 10 to 70 % for strongly-and 90 % for weakly mineralized water.
In the permeate, we determined the content of sulfates, chlorides, hardness, alkalinity, and a pH of the medium. We calculated the selectivity and performance of the nano-filtering and reverse-osmotic membrane [12].
In order to soften and clean the concentrates after water membrane desalination, the reagent methods were used. The reagents used were lime, sodium hydroxalumi-nate, aluminum hydroxochloride, synthesized in a laboratory. When stirring, water was treated with reagents, aged at 40 °C in a thermostat for 2 hours. Sediment was separated on a paper filter "Blue Ribbon"; in the filtrate, we determined hardness, alkalinity, the concentration of sulfates, chlorides, and a pH of the water. The formed sediment was separated on the filter, analyzing the solution for all the above indicators. The degree of softening (Z\) and the degree of sulfate extraction from water (4) were calculated from formulae given in [13].
alkalinity to 17-18 (Fig. 2). Thus, a given method could be effectively used for the treatment of low mineralized waters.
C, mg-equiv./dm3 10.0
pH
8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0
♦........♦.........i r
1
2
3
10
V, dm3
Fig. 1. Dependence of the hardness (1), alkalinity (2), pH (3) of a low-mineralized solution on the volume passed through the ionite DOWEX MAC-3 in acidic form
C, mg-equiv./dm3
pH
50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0
- 6
L 2
1
2
3
5
V, dm3
0
Fig. 2. Dependence of the hardness (1), alkalinity (2), pH (3) of a highly mineralized solution on the volume passed through the ionite DOWEX MAC-3 in oxygen form
C, mg-equiv./dm3
pH
5. Results of studying the purification of mineralized water
50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0
5. 1. The efficiency of water softening using DOWEX MAC-3 depending on the form of an ionite and the composition of a solution
The effectiveness of the baromembrane desalination of water and the service time of membranes depends on the quality of their pre-purification. The high- and low-mineralized solutions were passed through DOWEX MAC-3 in the H+ and Na+ forms. The cation exchanger DOWEX MAC-3 has a high capacity for hardness ions, both in cleaning the low-mineralized solutions (Fig. 1) and in the purification of highly mineralized solutions (Fig. 2, 3).
The weakly acidic cation exchanger DOWEX MAC-3 in the H+ and Na+ forms does not sorbate the cations of metals from the solutions of salts of strong acids. In cases where solutions demonstrate hydrocarbonate alkalinity, there is the decarbonization of water and its softening. This leads to water acidification and a decrease in its pH to ~4. When the cation exchange capacity is depleted, the pH increases to 7.3 and the
0.8
1.2
1.6
1
■•••■•■ 2
•■••••• 3
V, dm3
Fig. 3. Dependence of the hardness (1), alkalinity (2), pH (3) of a highly mineralized solution on the volume passed through the ionite DOWEX MAC-3 in salt form
At the sodium-cation softening of water, the hardness ions change for the ions of sodium, so the hydro carbonates of magnesium and calcium are transferred to sodium bicarbonate. Alkali is a much stronger substrate than the calcium and magnesium hydroxides, so the hydrolysis of sodium bicarbonate is stronger. Therefore, when one passed a highly mineralized solution through the ionite DOWEX MAC-3 in the H+ and Na+ forms, there is an increase in pH to 7.5-8.9. The capacity of the weakly acidic cation exchanger for hardness ions is quite high, independent of the concentration of sodium ions in the solution. At the concentration of sodium
8
4
8
6
0
chloride of =29 g/dm3, full exchange dynamic capacity for hardness ions in the cation exchanger DOWEX MAC-3 reaches 3,000 mg-equiv./dm3. Thus, DOWEX MAC-3 makes it possible to soften water effectively in order to ensure the stabilizing treatment of water before its baromembrane desalination.
A, %
In the acidic weakly- and strongly mineralized solutions, the selectivity of the membrane for sulfates and hardness ions is more than 99 %, regardless of the reaction of the medium and the degree of permeate selection. In this case, the decrease in the selectivity for chlorides is observed (Fig. 4).
80 60 40 20 0
5. 2. The effectiveness of baromembrane desalination depending on the characteristics of a solution
The performance of the nano-filtration membrane decreases with an increasing degree of permeate selection, which is primarily due to the growth of salt content in the concentrate and the increase of osmotic pressure [12]. When filtering a low-mineralized solution at a working pressure of 0.4 MPa, we observed a decrease in performance from 8.17 to 6.80 dm3/m2-h, that is, by dm3/m2-h. When filtering a cationic solution, this indicator decreased from 8.85 to 7.69, that is, by 1.16 dm3/m2-h. The filtering time of the non-cation model solution was short enough for the formation of significant deposits on its surface. At prolonged filtering of the non-treated solution, the membrane performance would significantly decrease.
The selectivity of the membrane for sulfates when filtering a model solution was within 92.3-93.3 %, for the ions of hardness - 85.4-90.5 %. For the filtered solution, the selectivity of the membrane for chlorides is zero, similar to that of the non-treated solution, for sulfates, it is 73.9-77.9 %, for hardness ions - 64.9-70.5 %, which is 16- 24 % lower compared to the non-treated solution. Thus, after treating the solution on cation exchanger DOWEX MAC-3, we observed a slight reduction in the selectivity of the OPMN-P membrane. This is due to that the lowering of the pH changed the state of the hydrate shells of double-charged ions, sulfate anions, and cations of hardness. Water acidification influences the value of the electro-kinetic potential of the membrane surface and leads to the destruction of the hydrate membrane at the membrane surface and at the surface of the membrane's pores [12].
The desalination of the solution was accompanied by an increase in the content of sulfates in the concentrate of up to 32.6 mg-equiv./dm3 at a hardness of 28.5 mg-equiv./dm3, alkalinity 4.35 mg-equiv./dm3, the chloride content, similarly to the original solution, was 3.1 mg-equiv./dm3. In an acidic solution, the content of sulfates and hardness ions are smaller, which is associated with the lower selectivity of the membrane for these pollutants. Thus, at the nano-filtering purification of weakly mineralized waters, their desalination occurs due to the extraction of sulfates and partial water softening; chlorides and hydro carbonates are not retained.
Therefore, the nano-filtering water desalination is appropriate for low-mineralized waters with acceptable chloride content. At the desalination of highly mineralized concentrates, it is advisable to use reverse osmosis. The performance of the membrane at a working pressure of 0.40 MPa practically does not depend on the method for the preliminary stabilizing treatment of the solution because the filtration of small volumes of water produces almost no sediments on the membrane. At the filtration of large volumes of water, membrane performance at the stabilizing treatment of water would remain quite high for a long time of use. Acidification of solutions, extraction of hydrocarbons from them with partial softening provides stable operation of reverse osmosis membranes.
■■•■■■■ 1
40 2
60 •■ 3
80 4
R, %
Fig. 4. Dependence of the selectivity for chlorides of the reverse osmotic membrane Filmtec TW30-181-50 on the degree of permeate selection at the filtration of weakly-(1, 2) and strongly mineralized (3, 4) solution before (1, 3) and after (2, 4) its treatment using the weakly acidic cation exchanger DOWEX MAC-3
At the maximum degree of permeate selection from weakly mineralized water, the content of sulfates in the concentrates reaches ~70 mg-equiv./dm3, hardness ions ~50 mg-equiv./dm3, chlorides ~12 mg-equiv./dm3. At the desalination of strongly mineralized water, the content of sulfates in the concentrates reaches ~90 mg-equiv./dm3, hardness ions ~150 mg-equiv./dm3, chlorides ~1,500 mg-equiv./dm3.
5. 3. Determining the effectiveness of desalinating the concentrates of water baromembrane purification when using aluminum-containing reagents and subsequent disposal of the formed sediments
This work has defined the conditions for the effective softening of solutions and purification from sulfates by the complex treatment of lime and aluminum coagulants based on the conditions of the lowest secondary contamination of water. By choosing a ratio of sodium hydroxaluminate to aluminum hydroxochloride, it is possible to adjust the content of chlorides and sodium ions in the purified water. In this case, there occurred the neutralization of the alkali formed in the hydrolysis of sodium hydroxaluminate with hydrochloric acid, which was formed in the hydrolysis of aluminum hydroxochloride. Therefore, it is not necessary to use carbon dioxide to reduce the pH of the medium, which greatly simplifies the process. In addition, it is possible to achieve a high degree of water softening and sulfate removal.
Using lime can reduce sulfate concentration to 30 mg-equiv./dm3, so in further studies, this concentration was taken as original. The softening of the baromembrane water purification concentrate was quite effective. The efficiency of softening increased with reducing the consumption of lime, while increasing the dosage of CaO decreased the residual sulfate concentration. At the reagent softening of the concentrate formed during the baromembrane desalination of a highly- and low-mineralized solution, the alkalinity was within admissible limits (Fig. 5, 6). The total mineralization decreased to permissible values (>1,000 mg/dm3). Such water can be discharged to sewage or re-used at water treatment.
c, mg-
equiv./dm3 10
8
6
4
2
0
81
85
89
93
1
2
3
97 101 DCaO, mg/dm3
Fig. 5. Dependence of sulfate concentration (1), hardness ions (2), alkalinity (3), chlorides (4) on lime dosage at a dose of sodium hydroxaluminate of 7.0 mmol/dm3 and 5/6 of aluminum hydroxochloride 7.0 mmol/dm3 at the reagent softening of a low-mineralized solution: - ^=0.0020x3-0.5207x?+45.7242^-1,321.4796, R 2=0.9316; 2 - ^=-0.0028x3+0.7490^2-66.9933x+1,986.3740, R2=0.9758; 3 - ^=-0.0015x3+0.3877x?-32.0678x+868.4039, R2=0.9679
C, mg-
equiv./dm3
10 8 6 4 2 0
< > -
......
C Cl-, mg-equiv./dm3 1,500
97.2
101.2 105.2 .....1 -■-•»2
109.2 ■•■■•• 3 ••
113.2 •-■4
1,480 1,460 1,440 1,420 1,400 117.2 121.2
DCaO, mg/dm3
Fig. 6. Dependence of sulfate concentration (1), hardness ions (2), alkalinity (3), chlorides (4) on lime dosage at a dose of sodium hydroxaluminate of 8.4 mmol/dm3 and 5/6 of aluminum hydroxochloride 8.4 mmol/dm3 at the reagent softening of a highly mineralized solution: 1 - ^=0.0086x2-2.0647x+127.2562, R 2=0.9713; 2 - ^=0.0004x2+0.1642^-16.0743, R2=0.9787; 3 - ^=-0.0185x2+4.3588^-245.2231, R2=0.9791
The formed sediment can be added to cement in quantities 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 % by weight [14]. Thus, up to 7.5 % by weight of cement can be replaced with the sediment formed during reagent water purification, without deteriorating the physical and mechanical parameters of the material.
6. Discussion of results of the desalination of mineralized waters and the development of a technological scheme for the comprehensive purification of water from mines
One variant to implement the developed processes is a fundamental technological scheme of the comprehensive purification of water from mines, wastewater, and concentrates during the complete processing of waste which is formed (Fig. 7). After a wastewater averager (1), mineralized water enters the ultrafiltration membrane (3) for purification from suspended substances. This makes it possible to reduce the load on a reverse osmosis membrane, increase the productivity of the process with a decrease in energy costs, prolong the service life of the membranes. The stabilizing treatment of water, in terms of carbonate deposits and preventing the fouling on membranes that leads to a decrease in the flow of the filtrate and an increase in osmotic pressure, employs the ion exchange water softening using the weakly acidic cation exchanger
Dowex MAS-3 in an acidic or salt form (5). If the original solution contains a low concentration of chlorides, it is advisable to desalinate it on a nanofiltration membrane (6), which completely retains sulfates and ions of hardness and passes chlorides. To desalinate highly mineralized waters, it is advisable to use reverse osmosis. Concentrates with a high content of sulfates and hardness ions should be purified by depositing sulfates and by softening applying reagent methods. For a case of concentrates with a high content of chlorides, they, after reagent softening, should be electrochemically treated to produce active chlorine.
Following the baromembrane purification, concentrates enter a ruff type mixer (14), where lime is portioned, as well as sodium aluminate and aluminum hy-droxochloride. This process ensures deep water softening, up to 2.7-1.1 mg-equiv./dm3. It is possible to reduce the sulfate concentration to 2-3 mg-equiv./dm3. After the settling tank (15), we obtain softened water along with its clarification and discoloration. The sediment, formed during water desalination, is separated and directed to the processing as an expansion admixture for cement and a sulfate activator for the slag Portland cement.
Applying the proposed technological scheme of the comprehensive treatment of mineralized waters makes it possible to create low-waste technologies for the desalination of these waters, thereby enabling complete processing of the formed liquid and solid wastes into target products.
Water from mines, along with sulfates and chlorides, can contain nitrates. In the use of ion exchange, nitrates can be removed to admissible levels by the desalination of low mineralized waters. The separation of nitrates from highly mineralized waters is a difficult task. Therefore, in further studies, it is necessary to develop environmentally and economically feasible methods to separate these anions, which would make it possible to effectively desalinate water and recycle the wastes with obtaining target products.
7. Conclusions
1
8 9 10
1 i
11 12 13
III
Fig. 7. Principal technological diagram of the comprehensive desalination of wastewater from mines: 1 — averager of wastewater from mines; 2 — pumps;
3 — ultrafiltration membrane; 4 — HCl/NaCl consumption tank; 5 — cation exchanger filter Dowex MAC-3; 6 — reverse osmotic/nanofiltration membrane; 7 — receiving chamber; 8, 9, 10 — solution containers for lime, sodium aluminate, aluminum hydroxochloride; 11, 12, 13 — discharge containers for lime, sodium aluminate, aluminum hydroxochloride; 14 — ruff type mixer; 15 — vertical vortex settler; 16 — sludge storage device; 17 — MgCO3 discharge tank; 18 — regenerative solution reservoir; I — supply of wastewater from mines; II — water to consumer;
III — return of water after the settler to the averager; V — discharge to urban sewage; IV, VI — MgCl2 for evaporation and drying; VI — sediment for processing in building materials; VII — supply of solution to electrolysis
Most water resources have an elevated level of mineralization, so they require effective comprehensive preparation. Our technologies for the desalination of low- and highly mineralized waters make it possible to obtain water of the required quality to ensure the needs of industry and people.
1. We have developed methods of the stabilizing treatment of low- and highly mineralized waters in the processes of their baromembrane desalination in order to improve the efficiency and service time of the membranes. It has been shown that the weakly acidic cation exchanger Dowex MAC-3 ensures the effective extraction of hardness ions from low-mineralized water and water with a concentration of NaCl up to 10 %. It has been demonstrated that the nanofiltration membrane OPMN-P provides for the effective purification of low mineralized waters from sulfates and hardness ions. The membrane does not retain chlorides at the low selectivity for bicarbonate anions. This avoids accumulating these anions in the concentrates at the nanofiltration water purification.
2. It has been established that it is advisable to use the reverse osmosis membrane Filmtec TW30-1812-50 for the desalination of highly mineralized waters. The selectivity of the membrane for sulfates and hardness ions is ~99 % for waters of different chemical composition. The selectivity of low mineralized waters for chlorides is more than 90 % in a non-treated solution and 75-83 % in the acidic solution, highly mineralized - 90 % and 95 %, respectively.
3. We have developed ways to process the concentrates of baromembrane water purification in order to create the low-waste technologies of water demineralization. It has been shown that at the ratio of sodium hydroxalumi-nate to aluminum hydroxochloride 1:1, it was possible to effectively desalinate the low- and highly mineralized water concentrates. For the case of desalinating the concentrate of low mineralized waters, the sulfate concentration decreased to 2.55-6.53 mg-equiv./dm3 and hardness ions - to 3.31-9.02 mg-equiv./dm3. The sulfate concentration decreased to 3.718.23 mg-equiv./dm3 and hardness ions - to
4.20-10.65 mg-equiv./dm3 in the concentrate after the reverse osmotic desalination of highly mineralized waters. We have developed a technological scheme of the comprehensive treatment of mineralized waters, which enables the creation of the low-waste technologies for the desalination of these waters with the complete processing of sediments that are formed.
16
VI
2
References
Buzylo, V., Pavlychenko, A., Savelieva, T., Borysovska, O. (2018). Ecological aspects of managing the stressed-deformed state of the mountain massif during the development of multiple coal layers. E3S Web of Conferences, 60, 00013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/ e3sconf/20186000013
Moodley, I., Sheridan, C. M., Kappelmeyer, U., Akcil, A. (2018). Environmentally sustainable acid mine drainage remediation: Research developments with a focus on waste/by-products. Minerals Engineering, 126, 207-220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.mineng.2017.08.008
Kinnunen, P., Kyllonen, H., Kaartinen, T., Makinen, J., Heikkinen, J., Miettinen, V. (2018). Sulphate removal from mine water with chemical, biological and membrane technologies. Water Science and Technology, 2017 (1), 194-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.102 Karakulski, K., Gryta, M., Sasim, M. (2006). Production of process water using integrated membrane processes. Chemical Papers, 60 (6). doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-006-0076-y
5. Ambiado, K., Bustos, C., Schwarz, A., B rquez, R. (2016). Membrane technology applied to acid mine drainage from copper mining. Water Science and Technology, 75 (3), 705-715. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.556
6. Liu, D., Edraki, M., Malekizadeh, A., Schenk, P. M., Berry, L. (2019). Introducing the hydrate gel membrane technology for filtration of mine tailings. Minerals Engineering, 135, 1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.02.030
7. Kim, J. E., Phuntsho, S., Chekli, L., Choi, J. Y., Shon, H. K. (2018). Environmental and economic assessment of hybrid FO-RO/NF system with selected inorganic draw solutes for the treatment of mine impaired water. Desalination, 429, 96-104. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.desal.2017.12.016
8. Naidu, G., Ryu, S., Thiruvenkatachari, R., Choi, Y., Jeong, S., Vigneswaran, S. (2019). A critical review on remediation, reuse, and resource recovery from acid mine drainage. Environmental Pollution, 247, 1110-1124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.085
9. Mulopo, J. (2015). Continuous pilot scale assessment of the alkaline barium calcium desalination process for acid mine drainage treatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3 (2), 1295-1302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.12.001
10. Ostovar, M., Amiri, M. (2013). A Novel Eco-Friendly Technique for Efficient Control of Lime Water Softening Process. Water Environment Research, 85 (12), 2285-2293. doi: https://doi.org/10.2175/106143013x13807328848333
11. Gomelya, N. D., Trus, I. N., Nosacheva, Y. V. (2014). Water purification of sulfates by liming when adding reagents containing aluminum. Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology, 36 (2), 70-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.3103/s1063455x14020040
12. Trus, I., Radovenchyk, I., Halysh, V., Skiba, M., Vasylenko, I., Vorobyova, V. et. al. (2019). Innovative Approach in Creation of Integrated Technology of Desalination of Mineralized Water. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20 (8), 107-113. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.12911/22998993/110767
13. Trus, I. M., Fleisher, H. Y., Tokarchuk, V. V., Gomelya, M. D., Vorobyova, V. I. (2017). Utilization of the residues obtained during the process of purification of mineral mine water as a component of binding materials. Voprosy Khimii i Khimicheskoi Tekhnologii, 6, 104-109.
14. Halysh, V., Trus, I., Nikolaichuk, A., Skiba, M., Radovenchyk, I., Deykun, I. et. al. (2020). Spent Biosorbents as Additives in Cement Production. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 21 (2), 131-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/116328
