CC BY
19VOL. 1, ISSUE 1
2020
OPEN
9
ACCESS
STUDY OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SALMONELLA SPP. ISOLATED FROM FOOD AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL
Liliia VYGOVSKA, Vitalii NEDOSEKOV, Valerii USHKALOV, Oksana BOYKO, Oleksandra KEPPLE, Yuriy VISHOVAN, Sergiy TERESHCHENKO, Liliana DAVYDOVSKA, Sergiy BOIANOVSKIY, Valentina MOMOT, Tatyana KORCHOVA
Ukrainian Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
Corresponding author: Liliia Vygovska, e-mail: [email protected]
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3700957
CZU: 579.842.14:615.33.015.8
Key words: Salmonella spp., biological properties, antibiotics, resistance, susceptibility.
Cuvinte cheie: Salmonella spp., proprietafi biologice, antibiotice, rezistenfa, sen-sibilitate.
Introduction. Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health problem that the world is facing today.
Material and methods. Isolation and identification of Salmonella spp. were performed according to DSTU EN 12824: 2004; DSTU ISO 18593: 2006 standards; Nutrient media were manufactured in accordance with DSTU EN ISO 11133:2014 standard. The antibiotic susceptibility of cultures was determined by the disk diffusion method. The research findings were both studied and interpreted in accordance with EUCAST recommendations.
Results. Out of 10 samples (material was obtained from animals, humans and foods), 10 cultures of Salmonella spp. were isolated and analyzed. The cultures were mainly susceptible to semisynthetic and inhibitor-protected penicillins, cephalosporins, car-bapenems and more often to tetracyclines, macrolides, lincosamides. Most Salmonella spp. strains were intermediate susceptibility to aminoglycosides, 30% of Salmonella spp. strains were susceptible to pefloxacin (II) and only 10% were susceptible to ciprofloxacin (II).
Conclusions. The obtained data indicate the screening feasibility of antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella spp. including a wide range of tested drugs, which may be important in determining the antibiotic therapy.
STUDIEREA SENSIBILITApI LA ANTIBIOTICE A SPECIILOR DE SALMONELLA, IZOLATE DIN MATERIALE BIOLOGICE SI PRODUSE ALIMENTARE
Introducere. Actualmente, rezistenta antimicrobiana este o problema globala de sanatate publica.
Material §i metode. Izolarea si identificarea Salmonella spp a fost efectuata conform standardelor DSTU EN 12824:2004; DSTU ISO 18593:2006; mediile nutritive fiind preparate in conformitate cu standardul DSTU EN ISO 11133:2014. Sensibilitatea tulpinilor la antibiotice a fost determinata prin metoda disc-difuzimetrica, iar studiul si interpretarea rezultatelor au fost realizate in conformitate cu recomandarile EUCAST.
Rezultate. Din 10 probe (material prelevat de la animale, oameni si din alimente) au fost izolate si studiate 10 tulpini de Salmonella spp. Preponderent, tulpinile sunt sensi-bile la penicilinele de semisinteticecele protejate de inhibitori, cefalosporine, carbap-eneme; mai frecvent prezentand rezistenta la tetracicline, macrolide si lincosamide. Pentru aminoglicozide insa majoritatea tulpinilor Salmonella spp. au prezentat sen-sibilitate intermediara, astfel, din 30% tulpini Salmonella spp. sensibile la pefloxacina (II), doar 10% au fost sensibile la ciprofloxacina (II).
Concluzii. Datele obtinute indica fezabilitatea screening-ului sensibilitatii Salmonella spp. la antibioticele din cea mai larga lista posibila de preparate testate, impunandu-se drept actiune oportuna in determinarea antibioticoterapiei.
4 OHRM
ONE HEALTH & RISK MANAGEMENT
VOL. 1, ISSUE 1
2020
INTRODUCTION
Over the XXI century, infectious diseases are still the main causes of death worldwide (1, 2). Recently, the spread of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms has become a public concern. Antimicrobials have been used in the production of livestock products for therapeutic and prophylactic purposes, which contributed to the development of adaptive mechanisms to the applied antibiotics. This, in turn, served as an impetus for the production of new antimicrobial agents.
The Ukrainian agriculture sector shows a considerable sample size among global production volumes (3, 4). An increase in both the demand and production volume of agricultural products is accompanied by a free section of the continental boundaries of semi-finished or finished agri-food products (5). Migration of people, birds and terrestrial wild animals also has contributed to the microbial long-distance transfer (5, 6, 7, 8). All these factors have differently promoted the spread of multi-resistant microbial strains to the existing antibiotics both due to their transportation by living organisms over long distances, and due to the production of the agro-industrial complex.
The purpose of this work is to study the biological properties and assess the antibiotic resistance among various groups Salmonella spp. cultures, isolated from biological samples taken from Kiev, Volyn region.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Salmonella spp. strains were isolated and identified from the research materials according to: DSTU EN 12824:2004 Microbiology of food products and animal nutrition. Horizontal method for detecting Salmonella spp.; DSTU 4769:2007 Bacteriological study of pathological material from animals. Methods of detecting salmonella; MU 4.2.2723-10 "Laboratory diagnostics of salmonella, detection of Salmonella in food products and environmental objects", 2010; DSTU ISO 18593:2006 "Microbiology of food products and animal nutrition. The study of microbial fingerprinting and washings from the surface". Antibiotic susceptibility testing by disc diffusion method, using HiMedia's discs. The research findings were studied and interpreted in accordance with EU-CAST guidelines (9).
RESULTS
The microbial cultures were isolated during the microbiological assessment of materials taken from Kiev, Volyn region.
The study confirmed 6 samples of biomaterial, obtained from birds and 6 Salmonella spp. strains were identified: S. Typhimurium (from geese), S. Virchow (from ducks), S.Virchow (from chickens), S. Gallinarum, S. Pullorum (from chickens), S. Ente-ritidis (from chickens) S. Dublin (from calf); two cultures - from food samples (S. Enteritidis, which are rare Salmonella species (F-67+) and two cultures (S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium) found in people with symptoms of food poisoning).
The bacterial cultures formed a uniform turbidity and a small amount of white amorphous sediment in the Pepted Meat Broth, which was easily broken-down while being shaken. The cultures of S. Dublin, S. Gallinarum, S. Pullorum formed growth rings. The bacterial cultures formed transparent, tender, greyish and 3-4 mm S-colonies in Meat Infusion Agar.
The laboratory animals (white mice weighing 1618 g) which were subcutaneously administered doses of 0.5x109 CFU/cm3 died in 100% of experimental animals within 8 hours.
The research findings showed that the studied cultures in 100% of cases were susceptible to ampi-cillin and ampicillin/sulbactam, whereas were resistant to benzylpenicillin and methicillin; 90% of strains were resistant to oxacillin; 50% of cultures were susceptible to ticarcillin and 10% - resistant to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid; 30% of strains were susceptible and 60% were resistant to amoxicillin; 30% of cultures were susceptible 30% - resistant to piperacillin; 20% of strains were susceptible and 80% - resistant to carbenicillin.
The structural similarity between cephalosporins and penicillins causes the same mechanism of antimicrobial action and cross-allergies in some patients (10, 11). The studied Salmonella spp. strains showed susceptibility to most of cephalosporins; no direct dependence of levels of antimicrobial susceptibility to various generation of drugs was found: 80% of the studied strains showed susceptibility and 10% showed resistance to cefazolin (I); 60% of cultures showed susceptibility and 30% showed resistance to cephalexin (I); 90% of the studied bacterial strains were susceptible and 10% of cultures were resistant to cefaclor (II).
23l
O 014 DIVI 0NE HEALTH & VOL. 1, ISSUE 1
" Lin&lvl"l RISK MANAGEMENT 2020
20% of the studied cultures were susceptible and 60% are resistant to cefuroxime (II); 90% of the studied cultures were susceptible to cefamandole
(II), no resistant cultures were detected; 80% of the studied cultures were susceptible and 20% are resistant to cefixim (III); 30% of the studied cultures were susceptible and 30% were resistant to cefoperazone (III); 80% of the cultures of the studied cultures showed susceptibility to cefotaxim
(III), no resistant cultures were detected; 50% of the studied bacterial strains showed susceptibility and 20% were resistant to ceftazidime (III); 20% of the studied strains were susceptible and 20% were resistant to ceftriaxone (III); 100% of the studied strains showed resistance to cefepim (IV).
Due to the natural activity of carbapenems (imipe-nem and meropenem) against enterobacteria, the studied cultures were found susceptible to imipe-nem (70%) and meropenem (80%).
No Salmonella spp. resistant to carbapenems was detected.
The most studied cultures exhibited a moderate resistance to aminoglycosides: 20% of cultures were susceptible and 30% were resistant to streptomycin (I); 60% - susceptible and 10% - resistant to gentamicin (I); 20% - susceptible and 20% - resistant to kanamycin (I); 20% of cultures are susceptible and 80% - intermediate susceptible to neomycin (I); 40% -and 10% - resistant to tobramycin (II); except for netilin (II), to which 100% of the cultures were susceptible, and ami-kacin (III), which showed an inhibitory effect on 20% of the studied Salmonella spp. strains
Salmonella spp. have natural resistance to macroli-des (12, 13). Our studies also proved that Salmonella spp. is resistant to macrolides. However, cultures of S. Gallinarum, S. Pullorum, S. Dublin, S. Virchow (Q) were susceptible to azithromycin (15); S. Virchow (Q) strain was susceptible to clarithromycin.
Most of the Salmonella spp. showed natural resistance to tetracyclines. The culture of S. Gallinarum Pullorum was susceptible to tetracycline, doxycy-cline; S. Typhimurium (F) showed sensitivity to Tetracycline.
High concentrations of linquamides may also exhibit bactericidal effects to relatively high susceptible microorganisms (13, 14). The studies conducted on microbial resistance to lincosami-des showed susceptibility to lincomycin and clin-damycin, except for S. Virchow (Q) strain.
f 24
Depending on the mechanism of action, quinolo-nes differ completely from other AMP drugs. 50% of Salmonella spp. were susceptible to nalidixic acid (I), norfloxacin (II), levofloxacin (III), and gatifloxacin (IV). The remaining drugs showed a susceptibility of 30% (pefloxacin (II) to 10% (ciprofloxacin (II), оfloxacin (II), lomefloxacin (II)) of the studied cultures of Salmonella spp.
Pathogenic microorganisms rarely develop antibiotic resistance to nitrofurans. (19, 20, 21). The study results showed that 40% of the studied cultures were susceptibile to furazolidone.
All the studied Salmonella spp. strains were sus-ceptibile to chloramphenicol
DISCUSSIONS
Ten Salmonella spp. strains were isolated from 10 samples of food products and biological material of various origin. Among the isolated cultures, 2 isolates belong to S. Enteritidis, 2- to S. Typhimurium, 2- to S. Virchow, 1- to S. Dublin, S. Gallinarum, S. Pullorum, S. Muenchen, Salmonella F-67+. Cultural-morphological, enzymatic and antigenic properties of the selected cultures correspond to species characteristics; all bacterial cultures proved to be pathogenic in white mice.
The cultures were predominantly susceptible to semisynthetic and inhibitor-protected penicillins, cephalosporins and carbapenems; cultures showed resistance to tetracyclines, macrolides, and lincosamides in most cases. As regarding the aminoglycosides, most of Salmonella spp. strains showed intermediate resistance; up to 50% of studied Salmonella spp. strains were susceptible to some quinolones of different generations, however, cultures showed resistance to an overwhelming number of cases; 30% of the selected Salmonella spp. cultures were susceptible to amoxicillin, whereas the cultures were non-susceptible to ampicillin, a screening recommended by EUCAST (version 8) on the enterobacteria sensitivity to amoxicillin. From 30% of Salmonella spp. strains susceptible to pefloxacin (II) (EUCAST screening recommendations on susceptibility of Salmonella spp. to ciprofloxacin), 10% cultures showed susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (II).
The study analysis found that the studied cultures isolated from food products, sick and dead animals, and biomaterial obtained from people were characterized by natural susceptibility to
О ЛИ О ИД 0NE HEALTH & VOL. 1, ISSUE 1
" Lin&lvl"l RISK MANAGEMENT 2020
antibiotics; no cases of acquired resistance was the current rational use of antibiotic therapy may found within this study. This may indicate that, be effective.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The data obtained may indicate the need for screening studies on the susceptibility of Salmonella spp. strains to antibacterial drugs, while the list of studied drugs should be expanded as much as possible. It might be important when choosing an appropriate antibiotic therapy.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
All authors declare no competing interests.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This present research was financially supported by
the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine.
REFERENCES
1. Patel R, Kandefer D, Walsh M et al. Causes and timing of death in extremely premature infants from 2000 through 2011. New england journal of medicine. 2015;372(4):331-340.
2. Crump J, Medalla F, Joyce K et al. Antimicrobial resistance among invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica isolates in the United States: national antimicrobial resistance monitoring system, 1996 to 2007. Antimicrob agents chemother. 2011;55(3):1148-54.
3. Панорама аграрного сектора Украши/Мшктер-ство аграрно! полггики та продовольства, ДУ «1нститут економжи та прогнозування НААН Украши, ГО «Центр аграрних реформ»; 2017.
4. State statistics service of Ukraine. Statistical collection: livestock of Ukraine, 2016. 2017 Available from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [Accessed 10th Septemer 2019].
5. Feshhenko Y, Gumenyuk M, Denisov O. Antibiotic resistance of microorganisms. The state of the problem and the ways to solve it. Ukrainian chemotherapy journal. 2010;23(1):4-10.
6. Pruden A, Larsson D, Amezquita A, et al. Management options for reducing the release of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes to the environment. Environmental health perspectives. 2013;121(8):878.
7. Mc Nulty K, Soon J, Wallace C. et al. Antimicrobial resistance monitoring and surveillance in the meat chain: a report from five countries in the european union and european economic area. Trends in food science & technology. 2016; 58:1-13.
8. Moroz E, Bliznyuk M, Roshchin G. Risk-oriented approach in the structure of indicative planning in the system of medical protection of the population of Ukraine during military emergencies. Personnel policy in the field of health care in the face of threats to the national security of Ukraine. Proceedings of the Annual All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical
Conference on International Participation. Kyiv; 2017.
9. EUCAST. The european committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 2018 Available from: http:// www.eucast.org/ [Accessed 10th September 2019].
10. Threlfall E, Fisher I, Berghold C, et al. Antimicrobial drug resistance in isolates of Salmonella enterica from cases of salmonellosis in humans in Europe in 2000: results of international multi-centre surveillance. Euro surveill. 2003;8(2):41-5.
11. Parry C. Management of multiple drug-resistant salmonella infections. Management of multiple drug-resistance infections. Totowa: Humana press Inc; 2004.
12. Zuckerman J. Macrolides and ketolides: azithromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin. Infectious disease clinics of north America. 2004;18(3):621-649.
13. Tenson T, Lovmar M, Ehrenberg M. The mechanism of action of macrolides, lincosamides and strepto-gramin b reveals the nascent peptide exit path in the ribosome. Journal of molecular biology. 2003; 330(5):1005-1014.
14. Morar M, Bhullar K, Hughes D, et al. Structure and mechanism of the lincosamide antibiotic adenylyl-transferase linb. Structure. 2009; 17(12):1649-1659.
15. Emmerson A, Jones A. The quinolones: Decades of development and use. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003; 51(1):13-20.
16. Mitscher L. Bacterial topoisomerase inhibitors: qui-nolone and pyridone antibacterial agents. Chem rev. 2005; 105(2):559-92.
17. Linder J, Huang E, Steinman M, et al. Fluoroquino-lone prescribing in the United States: 1995 to 2002. American journal of medicine. 2005; 118(3):259-268.
18. Cramer D. The Mode of Action of Nitrofuran Compounds: II. Application of Physicochemical Methods to the Study of Action against Staphylococcus au-reus. J Bacteriol. 1947; 54(2):119-125.
19. Brodie A, Gots J. Nitrofurans as electron acceptors for certain respiratory enzymes. Arch Biochem Bio-phys. 1952; 39(1):165-173.
20. Röschenthaler R, Kindler P, Herrlich P, et al. The action of nitrofurantoin: inhibition of growth of Esche-
RM
ONE HEALTH & VOL. 1, ISSUE 1
RISK MANAGEMENT 2020
richia coli K 12 and of IPTG-induced beta-galaoto-sidase synthesis. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1970; 215(2):203-211. 21. Anderle C, Stieger M, Burrell M, et al. Biological activities of novel gyrase inhibitors of the aminocou-
marin class. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008; 52(6):1982-1990. 22. Allsop A. New antibiotic discovery, novel screens, novel targets and impact of microbial genomics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1998; 1(5):530-534.
Date of receipt of the manuscript: 31/08/2019 Date of acceptance for publication: 02/03/2020
Liliia VYGOVSKA, ORCID 0000-0001-6745-5753
Vitliy NEDOSEKOV, ORCID 0000-0001-7581-7478, SCOPUS Author ID 5718580555 Valerii USHKALOV, ORCID0000-0001-5694-632X, SCOPUS Author ID 36130483300 Oksana BOYKO, ORCID 0000-0001-8113-9423
Oleksandra KEPPLE, ORCID 0000-0002-8123-3310, Web of Science Researcher ID B-2919-2018 Yuriy VISHOVAN, ORCID 0000-0003-1128-593X Sergiy TERESHCHENKO, ORCID 0000-0002-5786-8711 Sergiy BOIANOVSKIY, ORCID 0000-0002-4621-5192
