CC BY
48
Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, Vol. 7 No. 4 2011, pp. 51-68 ISSN 1997-0838 Original Text Copyright © 2011 by Bhat Manjula S. and Yajurvedi H.N.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Stress induced alterations in pre-pubertal ovarian follicular development in rat
Bhat Manjula S. and Yajurvedi H.N.*
Department of Zoology, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore-570 006, India Phone: +91-0821-2419778 (O) 09740970928 9(Mob)
*E-mail: hnyajurvedi@rediffmail.com
Received August 13, 2011
The objective of the study was to find out whether stress experienced during neo-natal period alters the timing of formation of pre-antral and antral follicles and if so, whether pre-treatment with CRH receptor antagonist prevents these effects in rats. New born rat pups (n= 15) were exposed to maternal separation (6 hours/ day) from post-natal day (PND) 1 to 7 and were killed on PND 8, 11 and 15. The time of exposure was randomly changed every day during light phase (7Am to 7Pm) of the day to avoid habituation. There was a significant increase in serum corticosterone levels on PND 8 and 11 in stress group rats compared to controls indicating stress response in these pups. The ovary of both control and stressed rats contained oocytes and primary follicles on PND 8 and 11 and in showed progress of follicular development upto to pre-antral and early antral follicle formation on PND 11 and 15. However, mean number of healthy oocytes and all categories of follicles at all ages studied were significantly lower in stressed rats compared to controls. Concomitant with these changes, number of atreatic follicles showed an increase over control values in stressed rats. The increase in atresia of follicles was due to apoptosis as shown by increase in the percentage of granulosa cells showing TUNEL positive staining and caspase 3 activity. On the other hand, pre-treatment with CRH- receptor antagonist (CRH 9-41) 2ng/ 0.1 ml/ rat prior to undergoing stress regime on PND 1 to 7, prevented alterations in pre- pubertal follicular development thereby indicating that the ovarian changes were due to effects of stress induced activation of HPA axis. The results indicate that, stress during neonatal phase, though does not affect timing of formation of pre-antral and antral follicles, it does enhance atresia of follicles of all categories, including follicular reserve, which may affect the reproductive potential of adults. The results, for the first time reveal that CRF receptor antagonist prevents prepubertal ovarian stress response.
Key words: Anti-CRF / Apoptosis / Corticosterone / Follicular development / Ovary / Stress
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Stress induced alterations in pre-pubertal ovarian follicular development in rat
Bhat Manjula S. and Yajurvedi H.N.*
Department of Zoology, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore-570 006, India Phone: +91-0821-2419778 (O) 09740970928 9(Mob)
*E-mail: hnyajurvedi@rediffmail.com
Received August 13, 2011
The objective of the study was to find out whether stress experienced during neo-natal period alters the timing of formation of pre-antral and antral follicles and if so, whether pre-treatment with CRH receptor antagonist prevents these effects in rats. New born rat pups (n= 15) were exposed to maternal separation (6 hours/ day) from post-natal day (PND) 1 to 7 and were killed on PND 8, 11 and 15. The time of exposure was randomly changed every day during light phase (7Am to 7Pm) of the day to avoid habituation. There was a significant increase in serum corticosterone levels on PND 8 and 11 in stress group rats compared to controls indicating stress response in these pups. The ovary of both control and stressed rats contained oocytes and primary follicles on PND 8 and 11 and in showed progress of follicular development upto to pre-antral and early antral follicle formation on PND 11 and 15. However, mean number of healthy oocytes and all categories of follicles at all ages studied were significantly lower in stressed rats compared to controls. Concomitant with these changes, number of atreatic follicles showed an increase over control values in stressed rats. The increase in atresia of follicles was due to apoptosis as shown by increase in the percentage of granulosa cells showing TUNEL positive staining and caspase 3 activity. On the other hand, pre-treatment with CRH- receptor antagonist (CRH 9-41) 2ng/ 0.1 ml/ rat prior to undergoing stress regime on PND 1 to 7, prevented alterations in pre- pubertal follicular development thereby indicating that the ovarian changes were due to effects of stress induced activation of HPA axis. The results indicate that, stress during neonatal phase, though does not affect timing of formation of pre-antral and antral follicles, it does enhance atresia of follicles of all categories, including follicular reserve, which may affect the reproductive potential of adults. The results, for the first time reveal that CRF receptor antagonist prevents pre-pubertal ovarian stress response.
Key words: Anti-CRF / Apoptosis / Corticosterone / Follicular development / Ovary / Stress
It is reported that the female reproductive system be reversible but it may not be true during initial is highly sensitive to stress (Warren and Perloth, stages of development (Armstrong, 1986). Hence,
2001) and effect of stress on gonads in adults may stress experienced during neonatal or pre-pubertal
phases might have severe adverse effects on the ovarian follicular development. A few studies, reported earlier on influence of neonatal or prepubertal stress on reproduction have not focused on ovarian follicular development .For instance, in female rats, delay in puberty following forced swimming exercise (Pellarian- Massecotte et al., ^Т) , neonatal handling induced anovulatory cycles (Gomes et al 1999) and impaired development of reproductive function (Rhees et al , 2002) and neonatal maternal deprivation induced delayed vaginal opening and onset of estrous cycle in rats (Christopher- Lau et al., 1996) have been reported. These studies have not focused on stress induced alterations in pre-pubertal follicular dynamics. It is likely that animals face stressful conditions in their pre-pubertal stage in the wild. Since the pre-antral and antral follicles are first time formed during pre-pubertal phase and complement of follicles at puberty has bearing on adult follicular dynamics (Mazaud et al., 2002) it is imperative to know whether stress during pre-pubertal life affects the ovarian follicular development. In addition it is not known whether treatment with a CRH receptor antagonist can prevent the ovarian stress response. Hence, the present study aims at investigating i) the effects of stress experienced on post-natal days 1-Т on ovarian follicular development and ii) whether pre-treatment with a CRH receptor antagonist, a-helical CRH9-41, prevents ovarian stress response. MATERIAL AND METHODS Animals and their maintenance:
Wistar albino rats bred and maintained by the central animal facility of University of Mysore were used. The rats were maintained in polypropylene cages containing a bed of paddy husk and had free access to food and water throughout the day. The food was standard rat chow pallets of which
nutritional contents were according to recommended standard for albino rats. The tap water was provided in clean glass bottles. The rats were maintained in 12: 12 light and dark photoperiod (lights on 7AM to
7 PM). Animal care, treatment and anesthesia were according to the guidelines of the committee for purpose of control and supervision of experiments on animals (CPCSEA). All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional animal ethics committee (IACE) of University of Mysore. Experiments:
Experiment 1: The body weight of each pup was recorded immediately after birth on postnatal day (PND) 1 and the pups were randomly segregated into two groups. First group formed controls where in the pups were maintained with their mothers throughout the day without any disturbance. Pups in the second group (stress group) were exposed to maternal separation, 6 hours/ day from PND 1 to 7. The pups in this group were separated from their mothers and transferred to different cages having appropriate bedding. After 6 hours all the pups were shifted back to their original cages with their mothers. Timing of separation was randomly changed every day during light phase (7AM to 7 PM) to avoid habituation. Five pups from both the groups were autopsied on PND 8 ,11 and 15. At each autopsy weight of the body and ovary were recorded, later converted to relative weight (weight per 100 g body weight) of the ovary. The right ovary was fixed in Bouin’s fixative and left ovary in buffered formaldehyde gluteraldehyde for histological and immunochemical studies respectively. The blood sample was collected and, serum was separated and stored at -200C until corticosterone concentration was determined.
Experiment 2: The rat pups on. PND 1 were randomly segregated into three groups. First group
pups served as controls and were maintained with their mothers throughout the day without any disturbance. Each pup in the second and third groups was exposed to maternal separation, 6 hours/ day as described in experiment 1. In the 3 rd group each pup received (ip) CRH antagonist (a- helical CRH9-41), 2ng/ 0.1ml distilled water/day prior to undergoing stress regime. Five pups from all the three groups were autopsied on PND 8 and 11. At autopsy weight of the body and ovaries was recorded. The ovaries were fixed in Bouin’s fluid for histological studies.
Histology and follicle counts:
The ovaries fixed in Bouin’s fluid were processed according to the standard histological method and 5^m thick serial paraffin sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Different categories of follicles were identified and classified according to Pederson and Peters (1968). Oocytes within the syncytium were counted from each section. The naked oocytes from every alternate section, the primordial follicles from every 4th section, and primary follicles (type 3 a) from every 6th section were counted. A different counting procedure was followed for advanced primary follicles (type 3b) and pre-antral and antral follicles. Each section of the ovary was observed and only the follicles showing full size oocyte was included in counts of respective category and care was taken not to repeat the counting of the same follicle more than once.
Follicular atresia:
Atreatic follicles were identified following morphological criteria described by Greenwald and Roy (1994) in hematoxylin- eosin stained serial sections the ovary. The earliest sign of atresia was presence of 5% pyknotic granulosa cells in the largest cross section of the follicle.
TUNEL (Terminal nuceotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling) assay:
The follicular atresia, determined by histological criteria was further characterized by conducting TUNEL and caspase- 3 assays. Serial sections (8^m) of the ovary were cut from left ovary fixed in buffered formaldehyde gluteraldehyde and were spread on 3- aminopropyltriethoxy saline coated micro slides. The TUNEL assay was performed in some randomly selected sections using the kit supplied by Roche Diagnostics India Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India, following the procedures of the kit manufacturer. The number of TUNEL positive and negative granulosa cells were counted in randomly selected areas in ovary sections and expressed as percentage of TUNEL positive and negative granulosa cells.
Immunohistochemical localization of caspase-3:
Some randomly selected sections of the left ovary fixed in buffered formaldehyde gluteraldehyde were spread on 3-aminopropyltriethoxy saline coated micro slides. The primary antibody (anti-mouse caspase-3) was purchased from Bi Biotech India Pvt Ltd, R & D Systems, New Delhi, India and a standard immunohistochemistry technique protocol (Feranil et al., 2005) was used. Caspase -3 positive and negative granulosa cells were counted from randomly selected areas and expressed as percentage of caspase-3 positive and negative granulosa cells.
Estimation of serum concentration of corticosterone:
The corticosterone concentration was determined by enzyme linked immuno sorbant assay (ELISA) using the kit purchased from Neogen Corporation, Canada. The corticosterone was extracted from the serum collected at autopsy and stored at - 200C, following the procedure of the manufacturer.
Statistical analysis:
The mean values of each parameter were computed using data on a minimum of five animals in each group and expressed as mean ± SE. The
mean values were compared by one way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s multiple range test and judged significant if p <0.05. All statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 17.0.
Table 1 Effect of stress experienced during post natal days 1 to7 on body and ovary weight and serum corticosterone levels in rat.
Groups Body weight (g) Percent change increase in body weight compared to initial body weight Relative weight of ovary (mg/ 100g of body weight) Serum corticosterone level (ng/ml)
PND 8 Control group 10.58± 0.27a 52.96±1.30a 56.59±0.35a 0.59± 0.003a
Stress group 9.58± 0.30a 48.95±0.99a 45.71±0.66b 1.15± 0.002b
PND 11 Control group 16.70± 0.26b 72.40±1.91c 60.23±0.37c 0.77± 0.002c
Stress group 10.80± 0.38ac 59.41±4.24d 48.03±0.60d 1.35± 0.002d
PND 15 Control group 14.50± 1.31c 68.58±0.99c 64.50±1.23e
Stress group 12.56± 0.39d 60.17±1.15d 54.46±0.68f
ANOVA F value JL «■M 3 1 © cK V 17.90 (df=5,24) P<0.01 99.66 (df=5,24) P<0.01 269.62 (df= 3,8) P<0.01
• df= degrees of freedom. PND, postnatal day.
• All values are Mean ±SE; Mean values with same superscript letters in a given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly (P<0.05) different as judged by Duncan’s multiple test.
RESULTS Experiment 1:
Body and ovary weight:
Mean body weight and percentage gain in body weight of the pups in stress group were significantly lower on PND 11 and 15 compared to controls whereas they did not differ on PND 8 compared to controls (Table 1). Relative weight of the ovary in the stress group was significantly lower on PND 8, 11 and 15 compared to controls (Table1).
Serum corticosterone levels:
Mean of corticosterone level was significantly
higher in stressed rats on PND 8 and 11 compared to controls (Table- 1).
Histology of the ovary and follicle counts:
On PND 8, oocytes, primordial and primary follicles (both type 3 a and 3b) were present in the ovaries of both the control and stress group rats. Pre-antral follicles i.e. type 4, 5a and 5b, and early antral follicles (type 6) were present in the ovaries of control and stress group rats on PND 11 and 15 in addition to primordial and primary follicles, whereas oocytes were not found on PND 15 (Table-2).
Mean number of oocytes (type 1) was
significantly lower in stress group on PND 8 compared to controls (Table-2). Mean number of primordial follicles (type 2) and primary follicles (type 3 a) was significantly lower in stress group on PND 8, 11 and 15 compared to those of controls (Table- 2). There was a significant reduction in the mean number of advanced primary (type 3b) and early pre- antral follicles (type 4) in stress group on PND 11 and 15 compared to controls (Table-2). Mean number of pre-antral follicles type 5a was significantly lower in stress group on PND 11 compared to controls where as type 5b was significantly lower in stress group on PND 15 compared to controls (Table-2). Mean number of early antral follicles (type 6) was significantly lower in stress group on PND 15 compared to controls (Table-2).
Atresia:
Mean number of atreatic primary follicles (type 3a) were significantly higher in stressed rats on PND 8, 11 and 15 compared to controls (Table- 3). Mean number of atreatic advanced primary follicles (type 3b) and pre-antral follicles (type 4, 5a and 5b) were significantly higher in stressed rats on PND 11 and 15 compared to controls. Likewise atreatic antral follicles (type 6) number was significantly higher in stressed rats on PND 15 compared to controls (Table-3)
TUNEL assay and caspase-3 localization:
The ovaries of stressed rats revealed the increased percentage of granulosa cells showing TUNEL positive staining on PND 8, 11 and 15 (Fig. 2a & b), and caspase-3 immunolocalization on PND 11 and 15 compared to controls (Table- 4, Fig. 3a &b).
Experiment 2:
Body and ovary weight:
Mean body weight and percentage gain in body
weight, mean relative weight of the ovary were significantly reduced on PND 8 and 11 in stressed rats compared to controls and anti-CRF treated stressed rats (Table- 5). Mean relative weight of the ovary in anti-CRF treated stressed rats was significantly reduced compared to controls on PND
8 (Table- 5).
Histology of the ovary and follicular counts:
On PND 8 oocytes, primordial and primary follicles were present in all the three groups and in addition to these, pre- antral follicles (type 4, 5a and 5b) and early antral follicles (type 6) were present in the ovaries of rats in all the three groups on PND 11 (Table- 6). Mean number of oocytes (type 1), primordial follicles (type 2) and primary follicles (type 3a) was significantly lower in stressed rats on PND 8 and 11 compared to controls and anti-CRF treated stressed rats (Table- 6). There was no significant difference in the mean number of advanced primary follicles (type 3b) between controls; anti-CRF treated stressed rats on PND 8 and 11 (Table- 6). Mean number of pre-antral follicles i.e. type 4, 5a and 5b and early antral follicles (type 6) was significantly lower in stressed rats compared to controls and anti-CRF treated stressed rats on PND 11 (Table- 6).
Atresia:
Mean number of atreatic primary follicles i.e. both type 3 a and 3b was significantly higher in stressed rats on PND 8 on PND 11 compared to controls and anti-CRF treated stressed rats (Table-7). Mean number of atreatic pre- antral follicles (type 4, 5a and 5b) and early antral follicles (type 6) was significantly higher in stressed rats on PND 11 compared to controls and anti-CRF treated stressed rats (Table-7).
Bhat Manjula S. and Yajurvedi H.N. Table 2 Effect of stress on ovarian follicles during pre- pubertal period.
Groups Mean number of healthy follicles/ ovary ± SE
Mean number of oocytes ± SE Category Primordial Primary Pre-antral Antral
Stage 2 3a 3b 4 5a 5b 6
PND 8 Control group 1125.6±49.36a 2251.4± 21.57“ 394.8± 16.47a 66.2± 6.06a
Stress group 576±32.06b 1973.4± 17.92b 193.6± 3.65b 55.4± 2.83a
PND 11 Control group 258± 15.15c 2048.2± 7.76b 387.2± 27.81a 145.8± 7.22b’d 62± 2.91a 44.6± 2.54a 25.0± 2.14a 5.6± 0.4a
Stress group 191.6± 14.61c 1469.2± 131.41c 240.8± 6.22c 108.8± 7.75c 30± 2.93b 23± 1.48b 23± 1.48a 2.5± 0.5a
PND 15 Control group 2672.4± 11.83d 449.8± 16.85d 161.4± 9.09d 85.4± 3.66c 64.2± 3.51c 33.2± 1.52b 23.4± 1.28b
Stress group 1931.2± 37.03b 356.8± 12.15a 129.2± 4.47b 72.4± 3.18d 61± 2.09c 20.6± 1.46a 15± 0.83c
o|s- < to 194.65 (df=3.16) 47.98 (df=5,24) 38.30 (df=3,24) 49.58 (df=5,24) 54.97 (df=3,16) 56.05 (df=3,16) 10.95 (df=3,16) 89.74 (df=3,13)
• df= degrees of freedom. PND, postnatal day.
• All values are Mean ±SE; Mean values with same superscript letters in a given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly (P<0.05) different as judged by Duncan’s multiple test.
Table 3 Mean Number of atreatic follicles in controls and stressed rats.
Groups Mean number of atreatic follicles/ ovary ± SE
Primary Pre-antral Antral
3a 3b 4 5a 5b 6
PND 8 Control group 14.20±0.73a 8.60± 0.50a - - - -
Stress group 21.60±0.74b 10.40±0.60a - - - -
D P1 Control group 11.60±0.87c 8.60±0.40a 9.00± 0.44a 8.20±0.58a 5.60±0.40a 3.40±0.50a
Stress group 21.80±0.96b 21.60±0.87b 15.40±0.67b 14.80±0.58b 9.20±0.37b 3.25±1.31a
PND 15 Control group 18.20±0.96d 13.60±0.67c 9.20±0.48a 8.80±0.37a 6.20±0.37a 5.20±0.58a
Stress group 23.40±0.67b 24.20±1.06d 14.20±0.37b 12.00±0.44c 10.80±0.37c 8.50±0.28b
ANOVA F value 31.62 (df= 5,24) p< 0.01 88.56 (df= 5,24) p< 0.01 42.60 (df=3,16) p< 0.01 36.77 (df=3,16) p< 0.01 42.00 (df=3,16) p< 0.01 10.26 (df=3,16) p< 0.01
• df= degrees of freedom. PND, postnatal day.
• All values are Mean ±SE; Mean values with same superscript letters in a given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly (P<0.05) different as judged by Duncan’s multiple test.
Table 4 Percentage of TUNEL and caspase- 3 positive and negative granulosa cells in control and stressed rats.
Mean percent of granulosa cells.
TUNEL Caspase- 3
NEGATIVE POSITIVE NEGATIVE POSITIVE
PND 8 Control group 91.00±1.15a 9.00±1.15a 90.33±0.88a 9.67±0.88a
Stress group 77.33±2.02b 22.67±2.02b 86.66±1.45ab 13.34±1.45ab
PND 11 Control group 87.33±0.88a 12.67±0.88a 88.00±2.08ab 12.00±2.08a,b
Stress group 69.66±0.88c 30.34±0.88c 83.66±1.76bc 16.34±1.76bc
PND 15 Control group 85.66±2.02a 14.34±2.02a 82.00±1.15c 18.00±1.15c
Stress group 63.33±2.33d 36.67±2.33d 78.66±0.88d 21.34±0.88d
F value (df=) 42.99 42.99 8.77 8.77
(df= 5,12) (df= 5,12) (df= 5,12) (df= 5,12)
(p< 0.05) (p< 0.05) (p< 0.05) (p< 0.05)
• df= degrees of freedom. PND, postnatal day.
• All values are Mean ±SE; Mean values with same superscript letters in a given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly (P<0.05) different as judged by Duncan’s multiple test.
Table-5 Effect of stress and CRF antagonist on body and ovary weight in pre-pubertal rats.
Groups Body weight (g) Percentage increase in body weight Relative weight of ovary (mg/ 100g of body weight)
PND 8 Control group 11.47± 0.20a 58.18±1.90a 58.54±0.48a
Stress group 8.86± 0.20b 41.25±1.22b 45.83±0.21b
Stress + anti-CRF group 11.40± 0.29a 55.25±1.19a 55.82±0.49c
PND 11 Control group 17.09± 0.29c 72.47±1.20c 62.73±0.54d
Stress group 14.42± 0.45d 63.03±1.31d 48.30±0.75e
Stress + anti-CRF group 16.92± 0.16c 71.61±0.81c 61.21±0.55d
F value (df=5,24) 134.04 (p< 0.01) 77.93 (p< 0.01) 169.57 (p< 0.01)
• f= degrees of freedom. PND, postnatal day.
• All values are Mean ±SE; Mean values with same superscript letters in a given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly (P<0.05) different as judged by Duncan’s multiple test.
Groups Mean number/ ovary ± SE
Mean number of oocytes ± SE Mean number of follicles ±SE
Category Primor dial Primary Pre-antral Antral
Stage 2 3a 3b 4 5a 5b 6
PND 8 Control group 1144.25± 57.02a 2288.25 ± 35.15a 396.75± 11.81a -H « ? *
Stress group 625.40± 35.32b 1925.80 ± 15.46b 211.40± 14.95b 51.00± 2.96a
Stress + anti-CRF group 1015.25± 38.58c 2050.75 ± 70.48b 388.50± 12.03a 66.00± 3.10a
PND 11 Control group 260.60± 18.09d 2060.60 ± 18.95b 333.20± 21.13a’c 140.20± 8.62b 64.80± 4.8a 46.60± 1.43a 28.00± 2.12a 5.00± 0.31a
Stress group 235.20± 15.12d 1500.80 ± 63.93c 231.80± 13.47b 128.06± 14.87b 33.80± 4.11b 28.40± 2.80b 4.20± 0.37b 1.4± 0.60b
Stress + anti-CRF group 230.50± 19.62d 2013.00 ± 58.50b 299.75± 46.30c 134.00± 8.08b 61.25± 3.75a 40.50± 3.27a 25.75± 1.43a 4.25± 0.62a
F value P<0.01 156.03 (df=5,21) 31.82 (df=5,21) 12.39 (df=5,21) 20.82 (df=5,21) 15.96 (df=2,11) 14.43 (df=2,11) 78.70 (df=2,11) 14.01 (df=2,11)
• df= degrees of freedom. PND, postnatal day.
• All values are Mean ±SE; Mean values with same superscript letters in a given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly (P<0.05) different as judged by Duncan’s multiple test.
Table-7 Number of atreatic follicles in control, stressed and CRH antagonist treated stressed rats.
Groups Mean number of atreatic follicles ± SE
Primary Pre-antral
3a 3b 4 5a 5b
PND 8 Control group 13.25±0.62a 8.25±0.47a - - - -
Stress group 22.80±1.24b 16.20±1.01b - - - -
Stress + anti-CRF group 12.75±0.47a 9.00±0.40ac
PND 11 Control group 13.40±0.74a 10.60±0.67c 10.20±0.7 3a 8.60±0.50a 6.00±0.44a 4.20±0.2 0a
Stress group 21.40±0.81b 20.60±0.81d 17.60±0.5 0b 15.00±0.44 b 9.00±0.44 b 1.00±0.6 3b
Stress + anti-CRF group 12.25±0.47a 10.25±0.47a’ c 8.75±0.75a 8.25±0.62a 6.25±0.25a 3.00±0.5 7a
F value 34.43 (df=5,21) P<0.01 45.78 (df=5,21) P<0.01 51.41 (df=2,11) P<0.01 54.56 (df=2,11) P<0.01 16.94 (df=2,11) P<0.01 11.19 (df=2,11) P<0.01
• df= degrees of freedom. PND, postnatal day.
• All values are Mean ±SE; Mean values with same superscript letters in a given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly (P<0.05) different as judged by Duncan’s multiple test.
^6 5b -A*. -sb^ - .» * 4
5a la
4, 5^ 51)
( 5h 5)> > ^5b lb
Figure 1 (a & b) Cross sections of the ovary showing pre-antral follicles (type 4, 5a and 5b) and early antral follicles (type 6) on postnatal day 15 in both the control (Fig. 1a) and stressed (Fig. 1b) rats. H7 E, 40X
\ \
\ \
\
2a
2b
Figure 2 (a & b) Cross section of the ovary showing TUNEL staining in control (Fig. 2a) and stressed (Fig. 2b) rats on PND 11. Note the presence of more number of TUNEL positive oocytes (arrows) in stressed rats compared to controls. 200X.
3a
i/
3b
Figure 3 (a & b) Cross sections of the ovary showing caspase- 3 immuno localization on PND 15. Note the presence of more number of granulosa cells in the stressed rats (Fig. 3b) showing caspase-3 immunolocalization compared to controls (Fig. 3a). 100X.
DISCUSSION
Maternal separation is a widely used stressor to study the effects of stress in neonatal rats (Lau et al., 1999; Rhees et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2009) and an increase in serum levels of corticosterone, which is an indication of stress , has been reported following maternal separation in rats(Wilber et al., 2007). Further, stress is known to inhibit feeding in young animals (Carr 2002; Car and Norris, 2005) leading to loss in body weight. In the present study, maternal separation (6 hours/ day from PND 1 to 7) induced significant increase in serum corticosterone concentration on PND 8 and its prevalence on PND 11 coupled with loss in body weight on PND 11 and 15 indicate that the pups were stressed and hence the ovarian changes were stress responses. Maternal separation from PND 1 to 7, in the present study, resulted in marked alteration in ovarian follicular counts. Since, the follicular compliment at puberty has bearing on adult reproductive life (Mazaud, et al
2002), the altered follicular counts induced by maternal separation during pre-pubertal period in the present study may have impact on adult ovarian function.
Several studies revealed stress induced alterations in the follicular development in adults. For instance, stress due to heat alters the efficacy of follicular selection and dominance (Badinga et al., 1993, Jordan et al., 2003) and oocyte development (Hansen, 2009) in cows, first wave of dominant follicle and pre-ovulatory follicles in cattle (Wolfenson et al., 1995) and adversely affects follicular recruitment in goats (Ozawa et al., 2005). Similarly, excessive rain fall or transportation reduces ovulation rate in sheep (Daley, 1999). Present study, for the first time, reveals effects of stress experienced during neo-natal period on prepubertal ovarian follicular development. The study gains importance due to the fact that follicular reserve is established and first time different
categories of follicles differentiate during neo-natal and pre-pubertal life respectively. The fact that, controls as well as stressed rats ovaries contained primary follicles on PND 7, pre-antral follicles on PND 11 and antral follicles on PND 15 reveal that stress did not interfere with chronology of differentiation of different category of follicles, as the observations are comparable to those reported earlier in rats (McGee and Hsueh, 2000). However, there was a drastic effect of stress on survival of healthy follicles of different categories in the present study, as maternal separation from PND 1 to 7 , caused a significant reduction in healthy oocytes on PND 8, primordial and primary follicles (type 3a) on PND 8, 11 and 15, pre-antral (4) and antral follicles on PND 15. In addition relative weight of the ovary was also reduced in stressed rats on PND 8, 11 and 15. The results reveal that all categories of follicles in pre-pubertal ovary are sensitive to stress. Stress effects on adult ovary reported earlier (Badinga et al., 1993, Daley, 1999, Wolfenson et al., 1995, Jordan et al., 2003, Ozawa et al., 2005, Hansen, 2009) and in the pre-pubertal ovary in the present study put together demonstrate that irrespective of stage of development stress interferes with ovarian function in mammals.
In the present study, in stressed rats, decrease in the number of healthy follicles of any category was not accompanied by an increase in the number of follicles next in the hierarchy. On the other hand, there was an increase in the number of atreatic follicles concomitant with decrease in number of healthy follicles of each category, thereby suggesting that the decrease in the number of healthy follicles was due to increase in rate of atresia in stressed rats. The degeneration (atresia) of follicles is an apoptotic process (Durlinger et al., 2000), and in the present study molecular markers used to characterize atresia i.e. TUNEL assay and
Caspase-3 assay also support the increased rate of atresia due to stress. It is reported that caspases execute apoptosis (Hangartner, 2000; Markstrom et al., 2002) and activate DNase (CAD caspase activated DNases), an endonuclease responsible for internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, which is hallmark of apoptosis (Markstrom et al., 2002). Activation of caspase-3 leads to final stages of cellular death, by proteolytic dismantling of large variety of cellular components (Nicholson, 1999; Yakobi et al., 2004) and is required for granulosa cell apoptosis during follicular atresia (Matikainen et al., 2001). The cleavage of genomic DNA during apoptosis may yield double as well as single stranded breaks (nicks), which can be identified by labeling 3l-OH terminal with modified nucleotidyl transferase which catalyses polymerization of labeled nucleotides to 3l-OH DNA ends in the template independent manner. In the present study increase in number of primary, pre-antral and antral atreatic follicles as judged by morphological criteria in stressed rats was accompanied by a significant increase in the percentage of granulosa cells positive to caspase-3 and TUNEL staining thereby, conforming that the loss of follicles is by apoptotic process in stressed rats.
Activation of HPA- axis (Tsigos et al., 1999; Kapoor et al., 2006; Kyrou and Tsigos, 2008) and deleterious effects of HPA axis hormones on gonads in mammals are well documented (Rivest and River, 1995; Ferin, 1999; Tillbrook et al., 2000; Kalantaridou et al., 2004). Activation of HPA axis (Tsigos et al., 1999; Kapoor et al., 2006; Kyrou and Tsigos, 2008) and an increase in the glucocorticoid secretion are the most common stress responses (Maeda and Tsukumara, 2006). Deleterious effects of increased secretion of glucocorticoid are well documented. Glucocorticoids inhibit GnRH and gonadotropin secretion (Dubey and Plant, 1985;
River and Vale, 1985; Rabin et al., 1990; Chatterjee and Chatterjee, 2009; Saketos et al., 1993; O’Conner et al., 2000), reduce sensitivity of gonadotrophin receptors (Rabin et al., 1988; Calegero et al., 1999; O’Conner et al., 2000), reduce expression of acute steroid regulatory protein (STAR) (Haung and Li, 2001) and induce apoptosis of granulosa cells (Sasson et al., 2001; Shimuzu et al., 2005). In the present study, there was a significant increase in serum levels of corticosterone on PND 8 and 11 following exposure to maternal separation from PND 1 to 7 indicating stress response and activation of HPA axis. Concomitant with increased corticosterone level, there was increased rate of follicular atresia (increase in the number of atreatic follicles) in stressed rats. However, pre-treatment with a CRH- antagonist (CRF9-41), prevented stress induced increase in atresia, because number of healthy as well as atreatic follicles i.e. primary, pre-antral and antral follicles in CRF9-41 treated stressed pups did not significantly differ from controls despite undergoing stress, whereas those of stressed rats without anti-CRF treatment (group 2) showed significant increase in atreatic follicles and decrease in healthy follicles of all categories compared to controls.. Since anti-CRF prevents stress induced increased secretion of corticosterone (Maciag et al., 2002), the altered follicular complement following stress and its prevention due to pre-treatment with anti-CRF in stressed rats in the present study indicate that, stress induced altered follicular development in the present study was due to the activation of HPA- axis. The results for the first time show that, either CRF9-41 or similar CRH receptor antagonists can prevent deleterious ovarian stress responses in mammals.
Since many decades, a dogma prevailing in mammalian oocyte biology was that a finite number of primordial follicles are formed (follicular reserve)
either pre or post-natally, and this reserve is not renewed in life time (Zuckerman et al., 1951; McLaren, 1984; Anderson and Hirshfeild, 1992; Greenwald and Roy, 1994; McGee and Hsueh, 2000; Guigon et al., 2003; Telfer, 2004; Kerr et al., 2006; Bristol-Gould et al., 2006; Findlay et al., 2009). Gradual depletion of this reserve in adults occurs by atresia and ovulation leading to reproductive senescence (Cohen, 2004). However, in recent years this dogma has been challenged by the concept of neo-oogenesis (Johnson et al., 2004, 2005; Lee et al., 2007). Proliferative large cells purified from neonatal or adult mouse ovaries, maintained in vitro, when transplanted into ovaries of chemotheraphy sterilized recipients, generated oocytes, which were fertilized leading to viable offspring (Zou et al., 2009). Pachiarotti et al. (2010) also endorsed the neo-oogenesis hypothesis by demonstrating potential germ line stem cells derived from post-natal mouse ovary. These reports revealed that adult mammalian ovary can renew oocytes. However arguments were made against replenishment of oocytes, by statistical analysis of the follicle pool over reproductive period in mice (Bristol-Gould et al., 2006; Faddy and Gosden 2009). A study involving mathematical modeling of the ovarian reserve found no evidence to support the occurrence of neo-oogenesis in humans (Wallace and Kelsey, 2010).
Hence, to date a consensus has yet to emerge regarding the validity of neo-oogenesis in adult female mammals and arguments have been put forth in favour and against the neo-oogenesis (Notarianni, 2011). It is note worthy that except the study of Zou et al., (2009), the oocyte like cells which are source of follicular reserve, described by other workers cited above have not proved the capability of these oocyte like cells to form new individuals after fertilization. Further, thus far there is no
experimental demonstration that despite loss of follicular reserve either by chemotheraphy or other means, the individuals could show normal reproductive life span, comparable to normal individuals, by renewal of lost primordial follicles. The present study provides an evidence for formation of new batch of primordial follicles in pre-pubertal ovary. On PND 15 mean number of healthy primordial follicles were significantly higher in controls as well as in stressed rat ovaries compared to respective groups on PND 11.It is interesting to note that, on PND 15, despite increase in number of follicles of higher categories, i.e. primary, pre-antral and antral, which are derived from primordial follicles, the number of primordial follicles showed a significant increase in contrast to their significant decrease concomitant with increase in number of higher category follicles on PND 11 compared to PND 8 in both the groups. .Hence, increase in number of primordial follicles on PND 15 might be due to formation of new batch of primordial follicles between PND 11 and PND 15.Thus our present study provides a preliminary evidence for possibility of formation of new primordial follicles beyond normal period i.e. between PND 1 and 3 (McGee and Hsueh, 2000) reported in rats. However, this phenomenon may be due extended period of formation follicle reserve; rather than neo-oogenesis as it is observed in prepubertal rats..
AKNOWLEGEMENT
The work was supported a grant (F.32-519/2006(SR) by University Grants Commission, India.
REFERENCES
Anderson, L.D. and Hirshfield, A.N. (1992) An
overview of follicular development in the ovary:
from embryo to the fertilized ovum in vitro. Md
Med. J, 41, 614-620.
Armstrong, D.T. (1986) Environmental stress and ovarian function. Biology of Reproduction, 34, 29- 39.
Badinga, L., Thatcher, W.W., Diaz, T., Drost, M. and Wolfenson, D. (1993) Effect of environmental heat stress on follicular development and steroidogenesis in lactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology, 39, 797-810.
Bristol-Gould, S.K., Kreeger, P.K., Selkirk, C.G., Kilen, S.M., Mayo. K.E., Shea, L.D. and Woddruff, T.K., (2006) Fate of the initial follicle pool: empirical and mathematical evidence supporting its sufficiency for adult fertility. Developmental biology, 289, 149- 154.
Calogero, A.E., Burrello, N., Bosboom, A.M., Garofalo, M.R., Weber, R.F. and D’Agata, R
(1999) Glucocorticoids inhibit gonadotrophin releasing hormone by acting directly at the hypothalamic level. J. Endocrinol. Invest., 22(9), 666- 670.
Carr, J.A. and Norris, D.O. (2005) The adrenal gland. In: Endocrine disruption. Biological basis for health effects in wild life and humans (Eds: Norris, D.O., and Carr, J.A.,) Oxford university press. USA. 111- 134.
Carr, J. A. (2002) Stress, neuropeptides, and feeding behavior: A comparative perspective. Integ. and Comp. Biol., 42, 582- 590.
Chatterjee, A. and Chatterjee, R. (2009) How stress affects female reproduction: an overview.
Biomedical Research; 20(2), 79- 83.
Daley, C.A., MacFarlane, M.S., Sakurai, H., and Adams, T.E. (1999) Effect of stress - like concentrations of cortisol on follicular development and the pre-ovulatory surge of LH
in sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 117, 11-16.
Dubey, A.K. and Plant, T.M. (1985) A suppression of gonadotropin secretion by cortisol in castrated male Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) mediated by the interruption of hypo-thalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone release. Biol Reprod, 33, 423-431.
Durlinger, A.L.L., Kramer, P., Karels, B., Grootegoed, J.A., Uilenbroek, J.T.J. and Themmen, A.P.N. (2000) Apoptotic and proliferatic changes during induced atresia of pre- ovulatory follilves in the rat. Human Reproduction, 15(12), 2504- 2511.
Faddy, M. and Gosden, R. (2009) Let’s not ignore the statistics. Biol. Reprod., 81, 231-232.
Feranil, J.B., Isobe, N. and Nakao, T. (2005) Apoptosis in the antral follicles of swamp buffalo and cattle ovary: TUNEL and caspase-histochemistry. Reprod. Dom. Anim, 40, 111116.
Ferin, M. (1999) Stress and the reproductive cycle. J. Clin. Endo and Met., 84(6), 1768-1774.
Findlay, J.K., Kerr, J.B., Britt, K., Liew, S.H., Simpson, E.R., Rosairo, D., and Drummond, A., (2009) Ovarian physiology: follicle
development, oocyte and hormone relationships.
Anim. Reprod., 6(1), 16- 19.
Gomes C.M., Frantz P.J., Sanvitto, G.L., Anselmo-Franci, J.A. and Lucion, A.B. (1999) Neonatal handling induces anovulatory estrous cycles in rats. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 32, 1239-1242.
Greenwald, G.S., and Roy S.K., (1994) Follicular development and its control. In the physiology of reproduction. Eds. Knobil, E., and J.D. Neil,
Ravan Press, New York. 629- 724.
Guigon, C.J., Mazaud, S., Forest, M.G., Brailly-Tabard, S., Coudouel, N., and Marge, S. (2003) Unaltered development of the initial follicular waves and normal pubertal onset in female rats after neonatal deletion of the follicular waves. Endocrinology, 144(8), 3651- 3662.
Hangartner, M.O. (2000) The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nature 407, 770-776.
Hansen, P.J. (2009) Effect of heat stress on mammalian reproduction. Phil. R. Trans. Soc., 364, 3341- 3350.
Haung, T. and Li, S.P. (2001) Dexamethasone inhibits leutinizing hormone induced synthesis of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in cultured rat pre-ovulatory follicles. Biology of Reproduction, 64, 163- 170.
Johnson, J., Bagley, J., Skaznik-Wikiel, M., Lee, H.J., Adams, G.B., Niikura, Y., Tschudy, K.S., Tilly, J.C., Cortes, M.L., Forkert, R., Spitzer, T., Iacomini, J., Scadden, D.T. and Tilly, J.L. (2005) Oocyte generation in adult mammalian ovaries by putative germ cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Cell, 122, 303--315.
Johnson, J., Canning, J., Kaneko, T., Pru, J.K. and Tilly, J.L. (2004) Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature, 428, 145-150.
Jordan, E.A. (2003) Heat stress and reproduction. J. dairy Sci., 86,: E104-E114.
Kalantaridou, S.N., Makrigiannakis, Zoumakis, A.E. And Chrouses, G.P. (2004). Stress and the female reproductive system. J. Reprod. Immunol., 62, 31
Kapoor, A., Dunn, E., Kostaki, A., Murcus, H. and Matthews, H.G. (2006) Fetal programming of hypothalamo- pituitary- adrenal function: prenatal stress and glucocorticoids. J. Physiol., 572(1), 31- 44.
Kerr, C.L., Shamblott, M.J. and Gearhart, J.D. (2006) Pluripotent stem cells from germ cells.
Methods Enzymol, 419, 400-426.
Kwak, H.R., Lee, J.W., Kwon, K., Kang, C.D., Cheong, I.Y., Chun, W., Kim, S. and Lee, H.J. (2009) Maternal social separation of adolescent rat induces hyperactivity and anxiolytic behavior. Korean J Physio Pharmacol, 13, 7983.
Kyrou, I. and Tsigos, C (2008) Chronic stress, visceral obesity and gonadal dysfunction. Hormones 7(4), 287- 293
Lau, C., Klinfelter, G., and Cameron, A., (1996) Reproductive development and function in the rat after repeated maternal deprivation stress.
Fundamental and applied toxicology, 30, 298301.
Lee, H.J., Selesniemi, K., Niikura, Y., Klien, R., Dombkowski, D.M. and Tilly, J.L. (2007) Bone marrow transplantation generates immature oocytes and rescueslong term fertlity in a preclinical mouse model of chemotheraphy induced premature ovarian failure. J. Clin. Oncol, 25, 3198- 3204.
Maciag, C.M., Dent, G., Gilligan, P., He, L., Dowling, K., Ko, T., Levine, S. and Smith, M.A. (2002) Effects of non- peptide CRF antagonist (DMP 696) on the behaviotral and endocrine sequelae of maternal separation. Neuropsychopharmacology, 26, 574- 582.
Maeda, K. and Tsukumara, H. (2006) The impact of stress on reproduction: Are glucocorticoids are inhibitory or protective to gonadotrophin secretion? Endocrinology, 147(3), 1085- 1086.
Markstrom, E., Svensson, E. Ch., Shao, R., Svanberg, B. and Billing, H. (2002) Survival factors regulating ovarian apoptosis- dependence
on follicle differentiation. Reproduction, 123, 23-30.
Matikainen, T., Perz, G.I., Zheng, T.S., Kluzak, T.R., Reuda, B.R., Flavell, R.A., and Tilly, J.L.
(2001) Caspase- 3 gene knockout ddefines cll lineage specificity for programmed cell death signaling in the ovary. Endocrinology, 142(6), 2468-2480.
Mazaud, S, Guigon, C.J., Lozach, A, Magre, S.
(2002) Establishment of the reproductive function and transient fertility of female rats lacking primordial follicle stock after fetal irradiation. Endocrinology 143(12), 4775-4787
McGee, E.A. and Hseuh, J.W.A. (2000) Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles.
Endocrine reviews, 21(2), 200- 214.
McLaren, A. (1984): Meiosis and differentiation of mouse germ cells. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., 38, 723.
Nicholson, D.W. (1999) Caspase structure, proteolytic substrates, and function during apoptotic cell death. Cell Death Differ., 6, 10281042.
Notarianni, E. (2011) Reinterpretation of evidence advanced for neo-oogenesis in mammals, in terms of a finite oocyte reserve. Journal of Ovarian Research, 4, 1-11.
O’Connor, T.M., O’Halloran, D.J. and Shanahan, F
(2000) The stress response and hypothalamo-pituitary- adrenal axis: from molecule to melonchonia. Q. J. Med.., 93, 323- 333.
Ozawa, M., Tabayashi, D., Latief, T.A., Shimizu, T., Oshima, I. and Kanai, Y. (2005) Alterations in follicular dynamics and steroidogenic abilities induced by heat stress during follicular ecruitment in goats. Reproduction 129, 621-630.
Pacchiarotti, J., Maki, C., Ramos, T., Marh, J.,. Howerton, K., Wong, J., Pham, J., Anorve, S., Chow, Y.C. and Izadyar, F. (2010). Differentiation potential of germ line stem cells derived from the postnatal mouse ovary. Differentiation, 79, 159-170.
Pederson, T., and Peters, H., (1968) Proposal for a classification of oocytes and follicles in the mouse ovary. J. Reorod. Fertllil., 17, 555- 557.
Pellarian -Messicotte, J., Brisson, G.R., St. Pierre, C., Rioux, P. and Rajotte, D. (1987) Effect of excersise on the onset of puberty, gonadotrophin and ovarian inhibin. Journal of Applied Physiology, 630, 1165- 1173.
Rabin, D.S., Schmidt, P.J., Campbell, G., Gold, P.W., Jensvold, M. and Rubinow, D.R., et al, (1990) Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in patients with the premenstrual syndrome. J Clin EndocrinolMetab., 71, 1158-1162.
Rabin, D., Gold, P.W., Margioris, A.N. and Chrousos, G.P. (1988) Stress and reproduction:physiologic and pathophysiologic interactions between the stress and reproductive axes. Adv Exp Med Biol., 245, 377-387.
Rhees, R.W., Lephart, E.D. and Eliason, D. (2001) Effect of maternal separation during early postnatal development on male sexual behavior and female reproductive function. Behave. Brain Res., 123(1), 1- 10.
River, C. and Vale, W. (1985) Effect of the Longterm Administration of Corticotropin- releasing Factor on the Pituitary-Adrenal and Pituitary-Gonadal Axis in the Male Rat. J. Clin. Invest., 75, 689-694.
Rivest, S. and Rivier, C. (1995) The role of corticotropin-releasing factor and interleukin- 1 in the regulation of neurons controlling
reproductive functions. Endocr Rev., 16, 177199.
Saketos, M., Sharma, N. and Santoro, N.F. (1993) Suppression of the hypothalamicpituitary-ovarian axis in normal women by glucocorticoids. Biol Reprod., 49, 1270-1276.
Sasson, R., Tijima, K. and Amsterdam, A. (2001) Glucocorticoids protect against apoptosis
induced by serum deprivation, cyclic adenosine 3l, 5l - monophosphate and P53 activation in immortalizedhuman granulosa cells:
involvement of Bcl-2. Endocrinology 142(2), 802- 811.
Shimizu, T., Ohshima, I., Ozawa, M., Takahashi, S., Tajima, A., Shiota, M., Miyazaki, H. and Kanai, Y. (2005) Heat stress diminishes gonadotropin receptor expression and enhances susceptibility to apoptosis of rat granulosa cells. Reproduction, 129, 463-472.
Telfer, E.E. (2004) Germline stem cells in the postnatal mammalian ovary: a phenomenon of prosimian primates and mice? Reprod Biol Endocrinol., 2, 24.
Tsigos, C., Kyrou, I., Chala, E., et al, (1999) Circulating tumor necrosis factor alpha concentrations are higher in abdominal versus peripheral obesity. Metabolism, 48, 1332-1335.
Wallace, W.H.B. and Kelsey T.W. (2010) Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause. PLoS One, 5, e8772.
Warren, M.P. and Perloth, N.E. (2001) The effect of intense exercise on the female reproductive system. Journal of Endocrinology, 170, 3-11.
Wilber, A.A., Southwood, C., Sokoloff, G., Steinmetz, J.E., and Wellman, C.L., (2007) Neonatal maternal separation alters adult eyeblink conditioning and glucocorticoids
receptor expression in the interpositus nucleus of the cerebellum. Dev. Neurobiol., 67, 1751-1764.
Wolfenson, D., Thatcher, W.W., Badinga, L., and Lew, B.J. (1995) The effect of heat stress on follicular development during estrous cycle in lactating dairy cattle. Biol. Reprod, 52, 11061115.
Yakobi, K., Wojtowicz, A., Tsafriri, A. and Gross, A. (2004) Gonadotrophins enhance caspase- 3 and -7 activity and apoptosis in the theca-interstitial cells of rat pre-ovulatory follicles in culture. Endocrinology, 145, 1943- 1951.
Zuckerman, S. (1951): The number of oocytes in the mature ovary. Recent Prog. Horm. Res., 6, 63108.
