CC BY
42023, Scienceline Publication
Worlds Veterinary Journal
World Vet J, 13(1): 45-56, March 25, 2023
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.54203/scil.2023.wvj5
Strategies for Prevention and Control of Multidrug-resistant Bacteria in Ruminants
Gamil Sayed Gamil Zeedan , Abeer Mostafa Abdalhamed* © , and Alaa Abdelmoneam Ghazy
Department ofParasitology and Animal Diseases (Infectious Diseases), National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth Street, Dokki, 12622, Giza, Egypt *Corresponding author's Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Antibiotics are no longer effective in treating bacterial infections due to antimicrobial drug resistance. Therefore, various alternative strategies have been developed to combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. The current review article aimed to shed light on strategies to prevent and control MDR bacteria in ruminants. Due to the development of new resistant bacteria, there is a need for effective treatments and prevention protocols in livestock and humans. With growing antibiotic-resistant organisms, a few antimicrobial medicines will be available to treat the infection when no new drugs are developed. This highlights the importance of looking for other strategies for combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria. In this regard, alternative strategies have been proposed to minimize antimicrobial drug overuse in ruminants. These alternative procedures include alternatives for growth promotion (such as in-feed enzymes, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and antimicrobial peptides), alternatives for disease prevention (such as vaccines, immune modulators, chicken egg yolk antibodies, farm management, and biosecurity), and alternatives for disease treatment such as plant extracts and phage-therapy to antibiotics. These alternative methods should be safe and efficient without inducing microbial resistance.
Keywords: Antibiotic, Bacteria, Multidrug-resistant, Medicine, Ruminants INTRODUCTION
The increase in bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics increases the need for research to find alternative strategies to reduce the use of antibiotics in animals (Aizawa et al., 20016; Alfredo and Rodríguez-Hernández, 2017; Abdalhamed et al., 2018). Alternatives products with antibiotics activity should be non-toxic, easily eliminated from the body, stable through the gastrointestinal tract, easily decomposed, friendly to the environment, selectively active against pathogens with minimum effects on host gut flora, and also have a positive impact on feed efficiency and promote growth. In addition, be effective for prevention and treatment against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial pathogens (Ali and Dixit, 2012)
Alternatives strategies for prevention and control of MDR bacteria in ruminants include antibiotics for growth promotion (such as in-feed enzymes, probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics, and antimicrobial peptides), alternatives to antibiotics for disease prevention (such as vaccines, immune modulators, chicken egg yolk antibodies, farm management, and biosecurity), alternatives to antibiotics for disease treatment (such as phytochemicals plant extracts and phage-therapy), and other alternatives for disease prevention include Nanoparticles (NPs) (Alwhibi and Soliman, 2014). Alternative methods may reduce antibiotic resistance but could not be a substitution for antibiotics (Aizawa et al., 20016; Babutan et al., 2021).
Antimicrobial peptides are host defense peptides, abundantly distributed in nature, and used as alternatives to antibiotic therapy, as they have direct and indirect inhibitory effects on pathogenic bacteria (Alfredo and Rodríguez-Hernández, 2017). Using vaccines against infectious diseases as an alternative therapy has attracted much attention because no resistance occurred against vaccines (Alwhibi and Soliman, 2014; Ike et al., 2021). Hypericin, an anthraquinone, has antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus spp. (Alwhibi and Soliman, 2014; Abdalhamed et al., 2021; Ike et al., 2021). Combinations between different plant extracts and purified plant derivative compounds could be effective against drug-resistant bacteria. Various plant compounds and antibiotic complexes could be effective against MDR bacteria (Anadón 2006, Abdalhamed et al., 2022).
Studies have revealed that about 70 species of bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., are susceptible to honey which has extreme antimicrobial activities (Atmaca, 2016; Ike et al., 2021). Bacteriophages (phages) are viral predators of bacteria and are evaluated as a potential alternative to antibiotics for treating antibiotic-resistant bacteria in human and veterinary medicine (Bai et al., 2018). Therefore, the current review article aimed to shed light on strategies to prevent and control MDR bacteria in ruminants.
ISSN 2322-4568
A R
c n
w
2 2 4
2 OO 6
t < e e d :
y
ON
2 O
3 2 2
JO E
I —
E W
A R T
HH
C
L
E
45
Alternatives to antibiotics for growth promotion
Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotic
Probiotics are live strains (yeast, fungi, and bacteria) of strictly selected microorganisms administered in adequate amounts to improve the balance of microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants. Lactobacillus (L.)spp., Bacillus spp., Enterococcus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Micrococcus spp., Pediococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Propionibacterium spp., Saccharomyces spp., Aspergillus spp. are the most common species that have been evaluated for their ability to replace with antibiotics for growth promotion and control enteric pathogens in dairy and beef cows (Baird et al., 2017; Razavi et al. 2019). An experiment that administered a probiotic mixture containing Lactobacillus (L.) acidophilus, L. helveticus, L. bulgaricus, L. lactic, Streptococcus thermophiles, and Enterococcus faecium to sheep experimentally infected with a Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) indicated a decreased fecal shedding of the pathogen (Baird et al., 2017). Probiotics are used as feed additives to improve animal health and productivity, stimulate intestinal microbial flora, improve digestion, enhance nutrient absorption and bioavailability, prevent enteric pathogens' colonization, stabilize pH, and increase mucosal immunity. They could act as an ideal candidate for enhancing the general health condition of ruminants. Lactobacillus acidophilus fecal isolate and Bifidobacterium pseudo catenulatum SPM1309 showed a strong growth inhibitory effect against MDR pseudomonas aeruginosa and MDR acinetobacter baumannii (Banai et al., 2002; Balakrishnan et al., 2017). The L. fermentum supernatant with bovine lactoferrin had synergistic inhibitory activities against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains (Barbu et al., 2016; Abdalhamed et al., 2021). The combinations of L.casei and L. rhamnosus with antibiotics amikacin and gentamycin (GEN) have synergistic activities on P. aeruginosa (Barthod et al., 2018).
Prebiotics are non-digestible dietary elements preferentially digested in gut microbes, resulting in increased immune response against antimicrobial activity and consequently improving host health. Carbohydrates, such as oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, polyols, and protein hydrolyses, are the most frequent prebiotics utilized in animal feed additives (Abd El-Moez et al., 2013). Fructo-oligosaccharide, spray-dried bovine serum, and oligosaccharides have specific health effects and decrease the incidence of enteric diseases. Manna-blocked pathogen colonization in the intestinal tract of calves that is by yeast fermentation such as yeast culture, cell walls, refined functional carbohydrates, and mannan-oligosaccharide (MOS) is used as prebiotics (Bechinger and Gorr, 2016). Mannan-oligosaccharide may act to inhibit bacterial and cryptosporidium attachment to the intestinal wall. Also, Bacillus subtilis alters the rumen microbiome and improves digestion at weaning. The administration of oligosaccharides promotes desirable intestinal microflora and improved growth performance in weaned calves. Commercial prebiotic celmanax prevents entero hemorrhagic E. coli colonization in the cattle gastrointestinal tract (Bhola and Bhadekar, 2019). Supplementing animal feed with probiotics increases lactate and antibody synthesis, reduces intestinal pH, inhibits intestinal microflora, and reduces pathogen bacteria in the stomach (Blair et al., 2015). Synbiotics are probiotics and prebiotics together. They are created to boost health benefits in a particular way. Continuous oral co-administration of synbiotics, such as the Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult and galactooligosaccharides, enhanced survival rates and protected mice in an in-vivo investigation when they were challenged with MDR Acinetobacter baumannii. (Bricknell and Dalmo, 2005). Synbiotics are natural and safe, also supported by several research findings for possible application in food animals for preventing, supporting therapy, and safe alternative to current antibiotics for reducing antimicrobial usage (Chanda et al., 2011; Castillo and Gatlin 2015; Castelani et al., 2019).
Antimicrobial peptides
Antimicrobial peptides are host defense peptides, abundantly distributed in nature, and are used as alternatives to antibiotic therapy. They have direct and indirect inhibitory effects on pathogenic bacteria (Castillo and Gatlin, 2015). They are expected to be the next generation of alternatives to antibiotic therapy for preventing bacterial resistance (Chanda et al., 2011). Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities and are amphipathic. They have hydrophobic/cationic properties which bind with the phospholipid bilayer of the bacterial cell wall, causing cell wall portion and resulting in cell death (Chusri et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2014; Chanda et al., 2011). The AMPs enhance nutrient digestibility and benefit the growth performance of large and small ruminants (Cianciosi et al., 2018). They are formed by ribosomally synthesized bacteriocins and non-ribosomal bacitracin, gramicidin, and polymyxin (Cheng et al., 2014). The A3, P5, and cecropin AD are three synthetic AMPs that control animal growth by fostering a healthy gut microbiome (Cianciosi et al., 2018). Bacitracin zinc and methylene salicylic acid have been approved as feed additives in USA and China (Counoupas et al., 2018). SMAP-29, a cathelicidin-derived peptide isolated from sheep myeloid mRNA, induces antimicrobial activity against MRSA, vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. faecium and Pseudomonas (P.) aeruginosa. Antibacterial peptides isolated from Enterococcus mundtii (ST4V) have inhibitory effects against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus species, P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Streptococcus (S.) pneumonia and Staphylococcus (Crisol-Martínez et al., 2017). Peptide AP-CECT7121 is an antimicrobial peptide produced by Enterococcus faecalis CECT7121, with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive bacteria, an attractive candidate for its use as a natural therapeutic tool for the treatment of infections produced by multi-resistant Staph. aureus and vancomycin-resistant Ent. faecium isolated from humans and animals (Delany et al., 2014; Delpech et al., 2017).
46
Dewul (2014) suggests that AMP is used in feed additives for goats to improve rumen microbiota, and food efficiency, preventing ruminal fermentation and potentiating growth performance (Dhama et al., 2014). Dini et al. (2011) declared that the substitution and modification of peptide amino acids could enhance their antibacterial activity and be effective against all MDR bacteria spp.
Bacteriocin
Bacteriocins are ribosomal synthesized AMPs that destroy pathogenic bacteria cell walls. Bacteriocins are subdivided based on their modifications into class I (lantibiotics) and class II (heat-stable) peptides (Doolan et al., 2014; Dorneles et al., 2015). The P. aeruginosa is susceptible to the antibiotic actions of bacteriocins; in particular, pyocin S5 was effective at a concentration 100 times lower than tobramycin. Lactic acid (LAB) commonly secrete bacteriocins, while colicins and microcins are produced from E. coli (Eja et al., 2011). Probiotics using lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and bacteriocins like nisin are the most commonly explored (Giguere et al ., 2013). Founou et al. (2016) indicated that bacteriocins act on cell walls and inhibit protein expression genes. Commercially available bacteriocin products can treat superficial and systemic bacterial infections. They have several potential applications in veterinary medicine as nisin-based teat sanitizers, amrubisin, Wipe- Out® Dairy, Wipes, and Mast Out® are alternatives for antibiotics in treating mastitis. A teat dip containing lantibiotic available for therapeutic uses against staphylococcal infection. It has been demonstrated to be highly effective against S. aureus and S. dysgalactiae (Giguere et al., 2013). Founou et al. (2016) revealed that multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus spp., which causes mastitis, may be controlled by cationic nisin/dioctadecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide NPs.
In-feed enzymes
By acting on feed components in the animal's gastrointestinal tract, several enzymes are added to animal feed to improve digestion processes and nutritional bioavailability (Giguere et al., 2013). In-feed Enzymes are crucial components for minimizing drug misuse and are a stimulant for animals' immune and overall health. The most popular feed enzymes are glycanase and phytase, offered commercially as feed additives (Hamasalim, 2016). The advantages of feed enzymes are optimizing digestion and enhanced nutrient availability of high-fiber ration in the rumen of ruminants (Hambleton et al., 1988). The direct impact of feed enzymes is on animals' natural immunity; the p-mannanase enzyme is commercially available as p-mannanase (CTCzyme®); it could decrease the somatic cell counts in cow's milk (Hana et al., 2016). In light of these findings, in-feed enzymes could be an effective alternative to antibiotics in controlling Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) bacteria in dairy cattle (Hazam et al., 2019).
Alternatives to antibiotics for disease prevention
Vaccines
Vaccination is an effective strategy for preventing and eradicating infectious diseases worldwide; it could be used against AMR bacteria in humans and animals. The application of vaccines as an alternative therapy to antibiotics has attracted much attention since there was no vaccination resistance (Hu et al., 2017). The common licensed veterinary vaccines include live-attenuated, inactivated, or killed vaccines and toxoids (Table 1). Veterinary vaccines are ideal candidates for preventing infections, reducing antibiotic consumption, enhancing productivity, and reducing antibiotic resistance (Jalilsood et al., 2015). Although vaccination has become a potent weapon against drug-resistant bacteria, some bacteria could evade the protection that vaccines are induced; hence, frequent vaccination updates are necessary (Jin et al., 2019). Vaccine development is crucial in the area where AMR bacteria are endemic (Jorge and Dellagostin, 2017).
Inactivated killed vaccines
The inactivated vaccine is produced in-vitro by inactivated bacterial cultures and adjuvant with oil-base to enhance immune responses. They are inexpensive in production and stable in storage. Oil adjuvant inactivated emulsion vaccine for Hemorrhagic septicemia (type B:6) is used for active immunization against hemorrhagic septicemia and pneumonic pasteurellosis for cattle, buffaloes, sheep, and goat vaccinations as shown in Table 1 (Jin et al., 2019). Currently, most bacterial vaccines include living attenuated and inactivated or killed microbial strains with varying degrees of efficacy; for example, Brucella (B.) abortus (RB51) is a vaccine used for brucellosis prevention in cattle (Jorge et al., 2016). Killed S. aureus vaccines are also developed for bovine mastitis (Jouda et al., 2016).
Live-attenuated vaccines
Live attenuated vaccines are prepared by the passage of bacteria in an unusual host or cell after several passages of the bacterial strain in different media (Kahn et al., 2019). Unlike the anti-viral vaccine, which is quite mature, the availability of antibacterial vaccines is still rare in the market (Jouda et al., 2016). However, Brucella abortus strain 19 and strain RB 51 vaccines, both live attenuated vaccines produced from Brucella abortus, are the most often utilized brucellosis vaccines in actual practice. The Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccination could provide longer-lasting protection for young calves than RB51. Furthermore, the RB51 vaccine aids in distinguishing between animals that have received the vaccination and those that have been infected by not interfering with serological diagnosis (Kar et al., 2016, Table 1).
47
Table 1. Vaccination schedules for bacterial diseases in ruminants
Disease Type Time of vaccination Immunity Dose/ route Indication
Black Quarter Formal killed vaccine Once a year, before the monsoon One season 5 ml/ SC Against Black Quarter in cattle and other ruminants.
B. abortus Strain 19 smooth (live) attenuated About 6 months of age 3-4 calving 2 ml/ SC to female calves between 4 to 8 months old Protection of cattle, buffaloes against Brucellosis
'Brucellosis RB51 Live attenuated vaccine of B. abortus rough strain RB51 1-2 years animals vaccinated annually 2ml as one or 2 doses at 30-day interval Protection cattle, buffaloes, and sheep against brucellosis by B. abortus
Living attenuated B. Melitensis vaccine 3 to 8 months lambs and kids
Hemorrhagic Septicemia (HS) Vaccine Inactivated HS Oil Adjuvant Vaccine (type B:6) Once a year, before monsoon One season 2 ml in cattle 1 ml in sheep, IM Protection of cattle and sheep against HS and pneumonic pasteurellosis
• Clostridial diseases • ULTRABAC® 7 • Covexin 8 • Cubolac 8 • Covaccin 10 ULTRABAC® 7 vaccine First dose 6 Weed of age second dose 4-6 weeks later/ Annual revaccination with a single dose One season 5 mL/ SC Protection against clostridial diseases: • blackleg - Clestrodium chauvoei • malignant edema - Clostridium septicum • black disease - Clostridium novyi • gas-gangrene - Clostridium sordellii • enterotoxemia, enteritis - Clostridium perfringens types B, C, and D
• Polyvalient clostridia vaccine Covexin 8 Polyvalent formalized killed vaccine 6 months 2 ml - sheep 5 ml cattle IM Protects cattle, sheep, and goat against clostridial diseases
Mixed Vaccine Inactivated Bovine Rota, Corona Viruses, and E. Coli Vaccine 2 doses at least two weeks apart to pregnant cows, the second dose given 2-3 weeks before calving. One year 4 ml in pregnant cow or buffalo against diarrhea caused by Rota, Coronaviruses, and E. Coli
Tuberculosis BCG About 6 months of age To be repeated every 2-3 years
Anthrax Spore Once a year, before monsoon One season 1ml, SC
B. abortus: Brucella abortus, RB51: Brucella abortus attenuated strain RB51 vaccine (RB51), BCG: Bacille Calmette-Guerin, SC: Subcutaneous, IM: Intramuscular, HS: Hemorrhagic septicemia, E. Coli: Escherichia coli
48
To cite this papery Gamil Zeedan GS, Abdalhamed AM, and Ghazy AA (2023). Strategies for Prevention and Control of Multidrug-resistant Bacteria in Ruminants. World Vet. J., 13 (1): 45-56. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.54203/scil.2023.wvj5
Toxoids
Toxoid vaccines are bacterial toxins that physically or chemically have treated until they no longer produce disease but retain the capacity to induce immunity (Karuppiah and Rajaram, 2012). They are currently used commercially as single toxoid vaccines such as toxoid from Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis causing caseous Lymphadenitis, and combined Clostridium perfringens Types C and D and tetanus (CD-T vaccine) for Sheep and goats (Karuppiah and Rajaram, 2012)
Recombinant vaccines
The DNA, subunit, and vector vaccinations are the three types of recombinant vaccines. Insertion cloning of a DNA segment into a vector is used to create recombinant vaccines. Recombinant DNA vaccines develop pathogenic agent-specific proteins, whereas subunit vaccines synthesize a recombinant protein in vitro and are injected into the host. Recombinant vector vaccines employ an attenuated bacterium to either proliferate and express the antigen within the host or multiply and express the antigen outside the host (Varadi et al., 2017). Advanced recombinant vaccines are unquestionably the future vaccines for animal disease prevention that develop safe, effective, and comprehensive protection against various infections. Before field trials, recombinant vaccinations must be safe for both the host and the environment (Kazemi et al., 2014). Recombinant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is vectored vaccine such as Ag85B antigen (a protein found on the bacterial surface) for cattle that showed protective immune responses against Mycobacterium bovis (Khulbe and Sati 2005). Various approaches have been investigated for vaccine development against S. aureus in bovine mastitis, including whole organism vaccines, live attenuated S. aureus, capsular-polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines, DNA vaccines encoding clumping factor A, and recombinant S. aureus-mutated enterotoxin type C (Kon and Rai 2012).
Immunostimulants
Immunostimulants are chemicals that activate phagocytes, and neutrophils and are the alternative complement system to lysozyme activity to boost the innate immune system of the hosts in a non-specific manner to promote resistance to the disease (Landers et al., 2012). By releasing cytokines and cytokine inhibitors, non-specific antiinflammatory drugs (steroids), and changing a particular antigen-based response through interferons, immunostimulants regulate the immune response to pathogen assault (Langeveld et al., 2014). Some bacterial substances (-glucans) and different plant constituents could directly initiate innate defense mechanisms by expressing intracellular gene(s) and controlling antimicrobial compound production. Animals' natural immune protection against pathogenic bacterial assault might be improved by using immunostimulants as feed additives during stressful times (Liu et al., 2017; Lewis, 2018).
Chicken egg yolk antibodies
Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) are immunoglobulin of birds, reptiles, and amphibians that transfer passive immunity to their embryos and offspring (Lubroth et al., 2007). Chicken IgY is used as an alternative to antibiotics for treating diarrhea in young calves (Figure 1). Also, IgY or hyperimmune egg products are commercially available worldwide to improve health and prevent enteric pathogens in young livestock. Now many companies are focusing on establishing and producing IgY for animal feed supplementation (Mabrouk, 2012). The oral administration of IgY to calves is commercially available against various intestinal pathogens, such as bovine enterotoxigenic E. coli and Salmonella spp. (Marquardt and Li, 2019). Data availability in-vivo about IgY in clinical trials indicates the possibility of using it as an alternative to current antibiotics (McCaughey et al., 2014).
Figure 1. Hyperimmune egg-yolk antibodies as a prophylaxis and treatment of intestinal microbial diseases in livestock prepared in a dry form by spray- or freeze-drying and incorporated diet with egg yolk
49
Alternatives to antibiotics for disease treatment
Plant-derived phytochemicals
Phytochemicals (phytobiotics or phytogenies) are natural bioactive compounds that originated from plants to treat MDR bacteria in ruminants or used as growth promoters (McCaughey et al., 2014; Marquardt and Li, 2018). Plant parts and extracts are mostly affordable, readily available, natural, and non-toxic. Quinones, alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, terpenoids, essential oils, tannins, lignans, glucosinolates, and a few secondary metabolites are among the phytochemicals' bioactive constituents. Some antimicrobial agents of plants include peptides that possess antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa (Meeusen et al., 2019). Hypericin, an anthraquinone, had antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus spp. An alkaloid called berberine has antibacterial properties against S. Agalactiae. Berberine, and its DNA-binding actions damage the bacterial cell membrane structure and cause cell death by making the membrane more permeable (Pliasas et al., 2022). A study showed the potent antibacterial properties of garlic against resistant bacterial strains, including P. aeruginosa (Molan and Rhodes, 2015). Methanol and chloroform extracts of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) inhibit E. coli (Mushtaq et al., 2016). Thalictrum minus extract showed antibacterial activities varied between the bacterial species, while 5-Hydroxy-thalidasine has good antibacterial activities in combination with ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and streptomycin against MDR. Anthraquinones and saponins in aloe vera have direct antibacterial effects (Okeke et al., 2011). Curcumin (CUR) and Nigella sativa have inhibitory effects against S. cereus, and S. aureus (Pachón-Ibanez et al., 2017). Egyptian honey, black cumin, and essential onion oils have an inhibitory effect against Gram-negative and positive AMR bacteria isolated from small ruminants with mastitis, with inhibitory zone diameter (IZD) of 13 mm to 28 mm and a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 3.25 to 25 mg/mL (Pariza and Cook, 2017). The IZD of Comiphora (c.) molmol oils extract against AMR Pseudomonas spp. isolated from dairy cows and buffaloes with mild mastitis varied from 3.25 and 6.25mg/mL (Payne, 2015). Peña-González et al. (2017) reported that the MIC of C. molmol methanolic extracts was 3.12 mg/mL for E. coli, Klebsiella (K.) pneumoniae, and P.aeruginosa. Meanwhile, it was 12.5 mg/mL for A. baumannii, and 6.25 mg/mL for S. aureus.
Combination therapy among herbal antimicrobials
Combinations between different plant extracts and purified plant derivative compounds synergize against drug-resistant bacteria (Purwanti and Yuwanta, 2014). The synergistic inhibitory effects of other fruits and leaves plant extracts (aqueous and ethanolic) of Foeniculum vulgare, Priminellaanisum, Carumcarvi, Majorana hortensis, Mentha longifolia, and Salvia officinalis medicinal plants reported on multi-drug-resistant E. coli O157:H7 isolated from human, cattle, and foods (Raguvaran et al., 2015). When tested individually, the aqueous extracts of Foeniculum vulgare had 1.4 cm (IZD) inhibition zone on E. coli O157:H7. Meanwhile, combining aqueous extracts of Foeniculum vulgare, Priminellaanisum, and Carumcarvi (1:1:1) had synergistic antibacterial effects against resistant E. coli with an inhibition zone of 4 cm . Thymus vulgaris combined with Cinnamomum zeylonicum essential oils have antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus, which is indicated by the synergistic effect of the combination between T. vulgaris, C. zeylonicumon, and S. aureus with fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index of 0.26 (Razná et al., 2020).
Combination between plant derivatives and antibiotics
The combination of plant compounds and antibiotics complexes synergizes against MDR bacteria. Synergistic effects were observed between tea extract and chloramphenicol against enteropathogens such as Salmonella (Sa.) Typhimurium, Sa. Typhi, Sa. dysenteriae, Yersinia enterocolitica, and E. coli. The synergistic inhibitory effects of chloramphenicol and tea extract against S. Dysenteria were 2.5 ^g /mL (MIC 5 ^g/mL) and 5.094 mg/ (MIC 9.089 mg/mL). The essential oil of Helichrysum italicum had inhibitory effects against MDR E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii, and when combined with beta-lactams, quinolones, and chloramphenicol increased their antimicrobial effects (Reinhardt, 2017). Mixing of ellagic and tannic acids enhanced the antibacterial activities of novobiocin, clorobiocin, rifampicin, and fusidic acid against Acinetobacter baumannii (Ren et al., 2019). A combination of ampicillin with A. sativum and, Gongronema latifolium extracts had additive effects and synergism against S. aureus (Rizzi et al., 2012). The synergistic activity between Salvia officinalis and Cichorium intybus extracts with amoxicillin and chloramphenicol against S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, B.subtilis, E.cloacae, K. pneumoniae, and P. mirabilis has been noted (Rodriguez et al., 2002). The combination of Coriandrum sativum essential oil and gentamicin antibiotic has a synergistic effect. In contrast, the antagonistic effect was observed in the variety of Coriandrum sativum essential oil and erythromycin antibiotics on Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria (Salim et al., 2018).
Honey against multidrug-resistant bacteria
Honey has extreme antimicrobial activities. About 70 species of bacteria are susceptible to honey, including MRSA and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE). The antimicrobial effects of honey occur from different components, including flavonoids, phenols, high sugar concentration, acidity, and the production of hydrogen peroxide. Also, other types of honey have methylglyoxal, lysozyme, and defensin-1, which induce antibacterial activity (Ahmed and Ibrahim HM 2016). The Synergistic effect among all the bioactive components of honey is responsible for its intense antibacterial activity (Schatzschneider, 2019).
50
Phage therapy
Bacteriophages (phages) are viral predators of bacteria, and they have the potential effect of being replaced with antibiotics for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in humans and animals. Lytic phages (Phagetherapy) are used to treat MDR bacteria, while temperate phage is unsuitable. Bacteriophages integrate their genome into the bacterial host DNA and transfer virulence factors, including antibiotic resistance genes, to targeted pathogenic bacteria (Figures 2 and 3). However, it is challenging to discover lytic phages specific to all bacterial diseases in the cattle industry (Sharma et al., 2018). Phages can interact with bacterial-specific binding sites on specific pathogenic bacteria by tail fibers without harming beneficial microflora. Commercial phages were introduced by many companies in the USA and France (Sharma et al., 2017).
Figure 2. Differentiation between phages and lytic phages cycles (https://coliphages.com/index.php/reproduction/ with UploadWizard)
Figure 3. Different nanoparticles mechanisms in bacterial cells (Singh et al., 2014).
Applications of nanoparticles for the prevention and treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria
Nanotechnology has evolved into a novel, significant branch of science with broader applications in veterinary sciences, particularly against MDR bacteria (Tawfick and Gad, 2014; Suzuki et al., 2014; Siddiqi et al., 2018; Simons et al., 2020). Nanoparticles have antibacterial properties and include silver (Ag), iron oxide(Fe3O4), titanium oxide(TiO2), copper oxide (CuO), gold (Au NPs), zinc oxide (ZnO), chitosan, carbon nanotubes. The antimicrobial mechanisms of NPs acted directly on the bacterial cell wall, preventing biofilm formation and triggering natural and acquired immune responses. They are produced by reactive oxygen species (ROS), which interact with DNA and proteins, as shown in the different bacterial mechanisms of NPs compared to standard antibiotics against MDR bacteria in Figure 3 (Varzakas et al., 2010; Vijayan et al., 2019).
The medicinal application of NPs for treating bovine mastitis is an important solution for treating MDR bacteria as an alternative to antibiotics against pathogenic bacteria. Wang et al. (2017) explored the synergistic activity of silver NPs and antibiotics by examining the antibacterial activity of AuNPs against E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, S. aureus, and K. pneumonia (Tiwari et al., 2005; Wittebole et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2017). They discovered that the MICs of AuNPs against the tested bacteria were 2.93 ug/ml, 7.56g/ml, 3.92 ug/ml, and 3.15 ug/ml, respectively. ZnONPs are used in animal health and production as an antibacterial, food preservative, and feed additive (Tiwari et al., 2005; Wittebole et al., 2014). Yew et al. (2016) reported that the different sizes of AuNPs successfully inhibited the growth of varying MDR bacteria, including MRSA. Zamek-Gliszczynski et al. (2018) mentioned that AgNPs and capsaicin have antibacterial characteristics and could effectively be used to inhibit the growth of MDR- extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) producing E. coli of bovine origin (Thu et al., 2017; Zeedan et al., 2018). The AgNPS has a promising effect on AMR bacteria. AgNPs with an average size of 10 nm using biomolecule apigenin can inhibit cell viability and biofilm formation of MDR pathogenic bacteria such as Prevotella Melaninogenica and Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolated from uterine secretion (Zeedan et al., 2014).
Farm management and biosecurity control
Biosecurity is vital in controlling AMR bacteria and reducing antibiotic control of AMR bacteria in animals. It is defined as all actions to stop the spread of infectious diseases among people or animals on farms and in the surrounding environment. Biosecurity decreases the possibility of infectious agent spreading (Simons et al., 2020).
CONCLUSION
The rising antibiotic resistance and the lack of new antimicrobials have triggered scientists to develop an alternative for antimicrobial compounds to minimize antibiotics use. Some other options have been proposed to reduce antimicrobial drug overuse to overcome the increasing rate of MDR bacteria in ruminants. These alternative procedures include alternatives to antibiotics for growth promotion (such as in-feed enzymes, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and antimicrobial peptides), alternatives to antibiotics for disease prevention (such as vaccines, immune modulators, chicken egg yolk antibodies, farm management, and biosecurity), and alternatives to antibiotics for disease treatment such as plant extracts and phage-therapy. These alternative methods should be safe and efficient without inducing microbial resistance. These strategies reduce the need for antibiotics in animals and combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Besides, rapid and accurate diagnostic approaches which provide sufficient sensitivity and specificity are necessary for detecting resistance in bacterial pathogens to fight and solve this problem.
DECLARATIONS
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt, for the time and facilities during this work.
Competing interests
The authors declared that they have no competing interests.
Funding
No Funding receive from any organization or any person.
Authors' contribution
Abeer M. Abdalhamed and Gamil SG Zeedan established the research idea and drafted the manuscript. Alaa A Ghazy shared in the conception of the research idea and helped in manuscript preparation.
Ethical consideration
Not applicable.
Material and data availability
Not applicable.
52
REFERENCES
Abdalhamed AM, Zeedan GSG, Arafa AA, Ibrahim ES, Sedky D, and Hafez AAN (2022). Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical and subclinical mastitis in ruminants and studying the effect of novel green synthetized nanoparticles as one of the alternative treatments. Veterinary Medicine International, 2022: 6309984. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6309984
Abdalhamed AM, Ghazy AA, Ibrahim ES, Arafa AA, and Zeedan GSG (2021). Therapeutic effect of biosynthetic gold nanoparticles on multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella species isolated from ruminants. Veterinary World, 14(12): 3200-3210. Available at: http://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.14/December-2021/19.html
Abdalhamed AM, Ghazy AA, and Zeedan GSG (2021). Studies on multidrug-resistance bacteria in ruminants with special interest on antimicrobial resistances genes. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 9(6): 835-844. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2021/9.6.835.844
Abdalhamed AM, Zeedan GSG, and Zein HA (2018). Isolation and identification of bacteria causing mastitis in small ruminants and their susceptibility to antibiotics, honey, essential oils, and plant extracts. Veterinary World, 11(3): 355-362. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.355-362
Abd El-Moez Nagwa SI, Ata NSA, Zaki MS (2013). Bacterial causes of sudden death in farm animals. Life Science Journal, 10(1): 1188-1201.
Ahmed HA and Ibrahim HM (2016). Efficacy of a locally prepared bovine mastitis vaccine. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, 30(1): 302-311. Available at: http://www.bvmj.bu.edu.eg
Aizawa E, Tsuji H, Asahara T, Takahashi T, Teraishi T, Yoshida S, Ota M, Koga N, Hattori K, and Kunugi H (2016). Possible association of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the gut microbiota of patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 202: 254-257. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.038
Alfredo NV and Rodríguez-Hernández J (2017). Antimicrobial polymeric nanostructures. Nanostructures for Antimicrobial Therapy, chapter 4, pp. 85115. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-46152-8.00004-4
Ali H and Dixit S (2012). In vitro antimicrobial activity of flavanoids of Ocimum sanctum with synergistic effect of their combined form. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease, 2(1): S396-S398. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(12)60189-3
Alwhibi MS and Soliman DA (2014). Evaluating the antibacterial activity of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) seed extract against a selection of different pathogenic bacteria. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 8(Spl. Edn. 2): 817-821. Available at: https://microbiologyjournal.org/evaluating-the-antibacterial-activity-of-fenugreek-trigonella-foenum-graecum-seed-extract-against-a-selection-of-different-pathogenic-bacteria/
Anadón A (2006). WS14 the EU ban of antibiotics as feed additives (2006): Alternatives and consumer safety. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 29: 41-44. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2006.00775 2.x
Babutan I, Alexandra-Delia L, and Ioan B (2021). Antimicrobial polymeric structures assembled on surfaces. Polymers, 13(10): 1552. DOI: https://www. doi.org/10.3390/polym13101552
Bai DP, Lin XY, Huang YF, and Zhang XF (2018). Theranostics aspects of various nanoparticles in veterinary medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(11): 3299. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113299
Baird JR, Monjazeb AM, Shah O, McGee H, Murphy WJ, Crittenden MR, and Gough MJ (2017). Stimulating innate immunity to enhance radiation therapy-induced tumor control. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 99(2): 362-373. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.014
Balakrishnan MN, Punniamurthy N, Mekala P, Ramakrishnan N, and Kumar SK (2017). Ethno-veterinary formulation for treatment of bovine mastitis. Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 18(S1): 377-382.
Banai M (2002). Control of small ruminant brucellosis by use of Brucella melitensis Rev. 1 vaccine: Laboratory aspects and field observations. Veterinary Microbiology, 90(1-4): 497-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00231-6
Barbu EM, Cady KC, and Hubby B (2016). Phage therapy in the era of synthetic biology, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 8: a023879. Available at: https://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/content/8/10/a023879.short
Barthod L, Lopez JG, Curti C, Bornet C, Roche M, Montana M, and Vanelle P (2018). News on therapeutic management of MDR-tuberculosis: A literature review. Journal of Chemotherapy, 30(1): 1-5. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1120009X.2017.1338845
Bechinger B and Gorr SU (2016). Antimicrobial peptides: Mechanisms of action and resistance. Journal of Dental Research. 96(3): 254-260. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1177/002203451667997
Bhola J and Bhadekar R (2019). Invitro synergistic activity of lactic acid bacteria against multi-drug resistant staphylococci. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 19: 70. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2470-3
Blair J, Webber MA, Baylay AJ, Ogbolu DO, and Piddock LJ (2015). Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 13(1): 42-51. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3380
Bricknell I and Dalmo RA (2005). The use of immunostimulants in fish larval aquaculture. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 19(5): 457-472. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j .fsi.2005.03.008
Castelani L, Arcaro JRP, Braga JEP, Bosso AS, Moura Q, Esposito F, Sauter IP, Cortez M, and Lincopan N (2019). Short communication: Activity of nisin, lipid bilayer fragments and cationic nisin-lipid nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus spp. isolated from bovine mastitis. Jourinal of Dairy Sciences, 102(1): 678-683. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15171
Castillo S and Gatlin III DM (2015). Dietary supplementation of exogenous carbohydrase enzymes in fish nutrition: A review. Aquaculture, 435: 286292. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.011
Chanda S, Dave R, and Kaneria M (2011). In vitro antioxidant property of some Indian medicinal plants. Research Journal of Medicinal Plants, 5(2): 169-179. Available at: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=rjmp.2011.169.179
Cheng G, Hao H, Xie S, Wang X, Dai M, Huang L, and Yuan Z (2014). Antibiotic alternatives: The substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry?. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5: 217. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217
Chusri S, Villanueva I, Voravuthikunchai SP, and Davies J (2009). Enhancing antibiotic activity: A strategy to control Acinetobacter infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 64(6): 1203-1211. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp381
Cianciosi D, Forbes-Hernández TY, Afrin S, Gasparrini M, Reboredo-Rodriguez P, Manna PP, Zhang J, Bravo Lamas L, Martínez SF, Toyos PA et al. (2018). Phenolic compounds in honey and their associated health benefits: A review. Molecules, 23(9): 2322. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092322
Counoupas C, Pinto R, Nagalingam G, Britton WJ, and Triccas JA (2018). Protective efficacy of recombinant BCG over-expressing protective, stage-specific antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Vaccine, 36(19): 2619-2629. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j .vaccine.2018.03.066
53
Crisol-Martínez E, Stanley D, Geier MS, Hughes RJ, and Moore RJ (2017). Understanding the mechanisms of zinc bacitracin and avilamycin on animal production: Linking gut microbiota and growth performance in chickens. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(11): 4547-4559. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8193-9
Delany I, Rappuoli R and DeGregorio E (2014). Vaccines for the 21st century. EMBO Molecular Medicine, 6: 708-720. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201403876
Delpech G, Bistoletti M, Ceci M, Lissarrague S, Bruni SS, and Sparo M (2017). Bactericidal activity and synergy studies of peptide AP-CECT7121 against multi-resistant bacteria isolated from human and animal soft tissue infections. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 9(3): 355-362. DOI https://www.doi .org/10.1007/s12602-017-9289-3
Dewulf J (2014). An online risk-based biosecurity scoring system for pig farms. Veterinary Ireland Journal, 4(8): 426-429. Available at: https://www.cabdirect.org/globalhealth/abstract/20143277428
Dhama K, Tiwari R Chakraborty S, Saminathan M, Kumar A, Karthik K, Wani MY, Amarpal, Vir Singh S, and Rahal A (2014). Evidence based antibacterial potentials of medicinal plants and herbs countering bacterial pathogens especially in the era of emerging drug resistance: An integrated update. International Journal of Pharmacology, 10(1): 1-43. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2014.1.43
Dini C, Fabbri A, and Geraci A (2011). The potential role of garlic (Allium sativum) against the multi-drug resistant tuberculosis pandemic: A review. Annali Dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita, 47(4): 465-473. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4415/ANN 11 04 18
Doolan DL, Apte SH, and Proietti C (2014). Genome-based vaccine design: The promise for malaria and other infectious diseases. International Journal for Parasitology, 44(12): 901-913. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.07.010
Dorneles EM, Lima KG, Teixeira-Caryalho A, Araujo SM, Martins-Filho AO, SriranganathanN, Al Qublan H, Heinemann MB, and Lage AP (2015). Immune response of calves vaccinated with Brucella abortusS19 or RB51 and revaccinated with RB51. PLoSONE, 10(9): e0136696. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136696
Eja ME, Arikpo GE, Enyi-Idoh KH, and Ikpeme EM (2011). An evaluation of the antimicrobial synergy of garlic (Allium sativum) and Utazi (Gongronema latifolium) on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Malaysian Journal of Microbiology, 7(1): 49-53. Available at: https://doaj.org/article/046bce6daa7447668e10c6192e3696cb
El Atki Y, Aouam I, El Kamari F, Taroq A, Nayme K, Timinouni M, Lyoussi B, and Abdellaoui A (2019). Antibacterial activity of cinnamon essential oils and their synergistic potential with antibiotics. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, 10(2): 63. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_366_18
Fomenky B (2019). Modulation of the gastrointestinal tract microbiota by two direct fed microbials and their efficacy as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoter use in calf management operations. Doctoral Dissertation, Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Founou LL, Founou RC, and Essack SY (2016). Antibiotic resistance in the food chain: A developing country-perspective. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7: 1881. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01881
Giguére S, Prescott JF, and Dowling PM (2013). Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine. John Wiley & Sons., pp. Available at: https://b2n.ir/p75542
Hamasalim HJ (2016). Synbiotic as feed additives relating to animal health and performance. Advances in Microbiology, 6(4): 288-302. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=65592
Hambleton P, Prior SD, and Robinson A (1988). Approaches to the rational design of bacterial vaccines. In: E. Jucker (Editor), Progress in Drug Research. pp. 377-378. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-0348-9154-7 11
Hana DB, Kadhim HM, Jasim GA, and Latif QN (2016). Antibacterial activity of Commiphora molmol extracts on some bacterial species in Iraq. Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy, 5(12): 406-412. Available at: https://saspublishers.com/article/1349/download/
Hazam PK, Goyal R, and Ramakrishnan V (2019). Peptide based antimicrobials: Design strategies and therapeutic potential. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 142: 10-22. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.08.006
Hu Y, Liu X, Shan C, Xia X, Wang Y, Dong M, and Zhou J (2017). Novel bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus alimentarius FM-MM4 from a traditional Chinese fermented meat Nanx Wudl: Purification, identification and antimicrobial characteristics. Food Control, 77: 290-297. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.02.007
Ike AC, Ononugbo CM, Obi OJ, Onu CJ, Olovo CV, Muo SO, Chukwu OS, Reward EE, and Omeke OP (2021). Towards improved use of vaccination in the control of infectious bronchitis and newcastle disease in poultry: Understanding the immunological mechanisms. Vaccines, 9(1): 20. DOI: https://www. doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9010020
Jalilsood T, Baradaran A, Song AA, Foo HL, Mustafa S, Saad WZ, Yusoff K, and Rahim RA (2015). Inhibition of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria by a novel biofilm-forming Lactobacillus isolate: A potential host for the expression of heterologous proteins. Microbial Cell Factories, 14: 96. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0283-8
Jorge S and Dellagostin OA (2017). The development of veterinary vaccines: A review of traditional methods and modern biotechnology approaches. Biotechnology Research and Innovation, 1(1): 6-13. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.biori.2017.10.001
Jouda MM, Elbashiti T, Masad A, and Albayoumi M (2016). The antibacterial effect of some medicinal plant extracts and their synergistic effect with antibiotics. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5(2): 23-33.
Kahn LH, Bergeron G, Bourassa MW, De Vegt B, Gill J, Gomes F, Malouin F, Opengart K, Ritter GD, Singer RS et al. (2019). From farm management to bacteriophage therapy: strategies to reduce antibiotic use in animal agriculture. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1441(1): 31-39. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14034
Kar D, Bandyopadhyay S, Dimri U, Mondal DB, Nanda PK, Das AK, Batabyal S, Dandapat P, and Bandyopadhyay S (2016). Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles and capsaicin against MDR-ESBL producing Escherichia coli: An in vitro study. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease, 6(10): 807-810. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(16)61135-0
Karuppiah P and Rajaram S (2012). Antibacterial effect of Allium sativum cloves and Zingiberofficinale rhizomes against multiple-drug resistant clinical pathogens. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 2(8): 597-601. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60104-X
Kazemi J, Ahmadi M, Dastmalchi Saee H, and Adibhesami M (2014). Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles along with protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus isolated from cattle mastitis. Biological Journal of Microorganism, 2(8): 15-22. Available at: https://bjm.ui.ac.ir/article_19503.html?lang=en
Khulbe K and Sati SC (2009). Antibacterial activity of Boenninghausenia albiflora reichb (Rutaceae). African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(22): 63466348. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.5897/AJB2009.000-9481
Kon KV and Rai MK (2012). Plant essential oils and their constituents in coping with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 10(7): 775-790. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.15 86/eri .12.57
Landers TF, Cohen B, Wittum TE, and Larson EL (2012). A review of antibiotic use in food animals: Perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Reports, 127(1): 4-22. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1177/003335491212700103
Langeveld WT, Veldhuizen EJ, and Burt SA (2014). Synergy between essential oil components and antibiotics: A review. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 40(1): 76-94. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2013.763219
Lewis A (2018). An in vitro evaluation of the antibacterial and anticancer properties of the antimicrobial peptide nisin Z. Doctoral dissertation, NorthWest University, South Africa.
Liu C, Guo J, Yan X, Tang Y, Mazumder A, Wu S, and Liang Y (2017). Antimicrobial nanomaterials against biofilms: An alternative strategy. Environmental Reviews, 25(2): 225-244. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1139/er-2016-0046
Lubroth J, Rweyemamu MM, Viljoen G, Diallo A, Dungu B, and Amanfu W (2007). Veterinary vaccines and their use in developing countries. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 26(1): 179-201. Available at: https://europepmc.org/article/med/17633302
Mabrouk MI (2012). Synergistic and antibacterial activity of six medicinal plants used in folklore medicine in Egypt against E. coli O157: H7. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(2): 1321-1327. Available at: http://www. aensiweb .com/old/jasr/jasr/2012/1321-1327.pdf
Marquardt RR and Li S (2018). Antimicrobial resistance in livestock: Advances and alternatives to antibiotics. Animal Frontiers, 8(2): 30-37. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1093/af/vfy001
McCaughey LC, Grinter R, Josts I, Roszak AW, Waloen KI, Cogdell RJ, Milner J, Evans T, Kelly S, Tucker NP et al. (2014). Lectin-like bacteriocins from Pseudomonas spp. utilise D-rhamnose containing lipopolysaccharide as a cellular receptor. PLoS Pathogens, 10(2): e1003898. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003898
Meeusen ENT, Walker J, Peters A, Pastoret PP, Jungersen G, Bousquet J et al. (2019). Veterinary vaccines and their use in developing countries Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International des Epizooties, 26(1): 179.
Molan PC and Rhodes T (2015). Honey: Abiologic wound dressing. Wounds, 27(6): 141-151. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10289/9553
Mushtaq S, Rather MA, Qazi PH, Aga MA, Shah AM, Shah A, and Ali MN (2016). Isolation and characterization of three benzylisoquinoline alkaloids from Thalictrum minus L. and their antibacterial activity against bovine mastitis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 193 : 221-226. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.07.040
Okeke IN, Peeling RW, Goossens H, Auckenthaler R, Olmsted SS, de Lavison JF, Zimmer BL, Perkins MD, and Nordqvist K (2011). Diagnostics as essential tools for containing antibacterial resistance. Drug Resistance Updates, 14(2): 95-106. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2011.02.002
Pachón-Ibanez ME, Smani Y, Pachon J, and Sanchez-Cespedes J (2017). Perspectives for clinical use of engineered human host defense antimicrobial peptides. FEMS Microbiology Review, 41(3): 323-342. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1093/femsre/fux012
Pariza MW and Cook M (2010). Determining the safety of enzymes used in animal feed. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 56(3): 332-342. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.10.005
Payne C (2015). The role of prebiotics in dairy calf performance, health, and immune function. Master of Science, Kansas State University, US. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2097/20420
Peña-González CE, Pedziwiatr-Werbicka E, Martín-Pérez T, Szewczyk EM, Copa-Patiño JL, Soliveri J, Pérez-Serrano J, Gómez R, Bryszewska M, Sánchez-Nieves J et al. (2017). Antibacterial and antifungal properties of dendronized silver and gold nanoparticles with cationic carbosilane dendrons. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 528(1-2): 55-61. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.067
Pliasas VC, Fthenakis GC, and Kyriakis CS (2022). Novel vaccine technologies in animal health. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9: 866908. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.866908
Potter A and Gerdts V (2008). Veterinary vaccines: Alternatives to antibiotics?. Animal Health Research Reviews, 9(2): 187-199. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S1466252308001606
Purwanti S, Zuprizal, Yuwanta T, and Supadmo (2014). Duodenum histomorphology and performance as influenced by dietary supplementation of turmeric (Curcuma longa), Garlic (Allium sativum) and its combinations as a feed additive in broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 13(1): 36-41. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2014.36.41
Raguvaran R, Manuja A, and Manuja BK (2015). Zinc oxide nanoparticles: opportunities and challenges in veterinary sciences. Immunome Research, 11(2): 1-8. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4172/1745-7580.1000095
Razavi SA, Pourjafar M, Hajimohammadi A, Valizadeh R, Naserian A, Laven R, and Mueller K (2019). Effects of dietary supplementation of bentonite and Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall on acute-phase protein and liver function in high-producing dairy cows during transition period. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51: 1225-1237. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11250-019-01815-3
Razná K, Sawinska Z, Ivanisová E, Vukovic N, Terentjeva M, Stricík M, Kowalczewski PL, Hlavacková L, Rovná K, Ziarovská J et al. (2020). antioxidant characterization, antimicrobial activities, and genomic microRNA based marker fingerprints. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(9): 3087. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093087
Reinhardt A (2017). Antimicrobial peptides as new potential antibiotics. PhD thesis, University of Cologne, Germany. Available at: https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/7672/
Ren Z, Yao R, Liu Q, Deng Y, Shen L, Deng H, Zuo Z, Wang Y, Deng J, Cui H et al. (2019). Effects of antibacterial peptides on rumen fermentation function and rumen microorganisms in goats. PLoS One, 14(8): e0221815. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221815
Rizzi C, Bianco MV, Blanco FC, Soria M, Gravisaco MJ, Montenegro V, Vagnoni L, Buddle B, Garbaccio S, Delgado F et al. (2012). Vaccination with a BCG strain overexpressing Ag85B protects cattle against Mycobacterium bovis challenge. PLoS One, 7(12): e51396. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051396
Rodriguez JM, Martinez MI, Kok J (2002). Pediocin PA-1, a wide-spectrum bacteriocin from lactic acid bacteria. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 42(2): 91-121. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10408690290825475
Salim HM, Huque KS, Kamaruddin KM, and Haque Beg A (2018). Global restriction of using antibiotic growth promoters and alternative strategies in poultry production. Science Progress, 101(1): 52-57. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3184/003685018X15173975498947
Schatzschneider U (2019). Antimicrobial activity of organometal compounds: Past, present, and future prospects. Advances in Bioorganometallic Chemistry, Chapter 9, pp. 173-192. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814197-7.00009-1
Sharma C, Rokana N, Chandra M, Singh BP, Gulhane RD, Gill JP, Ray P, Puniya AK, and Panwar H (2018). Antimicrobial resistance: Its surveillance, impact, and alternative management strategies in dairy animals. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 4: 237. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00237
Sharma G, Kumar A, Sharma S, Naushad M, Dwivedi RP, ALOthman ZA, and Mola GT (2017). Novel development of nanoparticles to bimetallic nanoparticles and their composites: A review. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 31(2): 257-269. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2017.06.012
Siddiqi KS, Husen A, and Rao RA (2018). A review on biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles and their biocidal properties. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 16: 14. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0334-5
Simons A, Alhanout K, and Duval RE (2020). Bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides from bacterial origin: Overview of their biology and their impact against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Microorganisms, 8(5): 639. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050639
Singh R Smitha MS, and Singh SP (2014). The role of nanotechnology in combating multi-drug resistant bacteria. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 14(7): 4745-4756. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2014.9527
Suzuki K, Yu C, Qu J, Li M, Yao X, Yuan T, Goebl A, Tang S, Ren R Aizawa E et al. (2014). Targeted gene correction minimally impacts whole-genome mutational load in human-disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cell clones. Cell Stem Cell, 15(1): 31-36. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.06.016
Tawfick MM and Gad AS (2014). In vitro antimicrobial activities of some Egyptian plants' essential oils with medicinal applications. American Journal of Drug Discovery and Development, 4(1): 32-40. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3923/ajdd.2014.32.40
Thu HM, Myat TW, Win MM, Thant KZ, Rahman S, Umeda K, Nguyen SV, Icatlo Jr FC, Higo-Moriguchi K, Taniguchi K et al. (2017). Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) for prophylaxis and treatment of rotavirus diarrhea in human and animal neonates: a concise review. Food Science of Animal Resources, 37(1): 1-9. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.1.1
Tiwari RP, Bharti SK, Kaur HD, Dikshit RP, and Hoondal GS (2005). Synergistic antimicrobial activity of tea and antibiotics. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 122(1): 80-84.
Varadi L, Luo JL, Hibbs DE, Perry JD, Anderson RJ, Orenga S, and Groundwater PW (2017). Methods for the detection and identification of pathogenic bacteria: Past, present, and future. Chemical Society Reviews, 46(16): 4818-32. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00693K
Varzakas TH, Arvanitoyannis IS, and Bezirtzoglou E (2010). Development and manufacture of yogurt and other functional dairy products. In: F. Yildis (Editor), Functional dairy foods and flora modulation. CRC Press., USA. pp. 339-374. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1201/9781420082081
Vijayan A and Chitnis CE (2019). Development of blood stage malaria vaccines. Methods in molecular biology. Humana., New York, NY. pp. 199218. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9550-9_15
Wang L, Qu K, Li X, Cao Z, Wang X, Li Z, Song Y, and Xu Y (2017). Use of bacteriophages to control Escherichia coli O157: H7 in domestic ruminants, meat products, and fruits and vegetables. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 14(9): 483-493. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1089/fpd.2016.2266
Yew YP, Shameli K, Miyake M, Kuwano N, Bt Ahmad Khairudin NB, Bt Mohamad SE, and Lee KX (2016). Green synthesis of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles using seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii) extract. Nanoscale Research Letters, 11: 276. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1498-2
Zamek-Gliszczynski MJ, Taub ME, Chothe PP, Chu X, Giacomini KM, Kim RB, Ray AS, Stocker SL, Unadkat JD, Wittwer MB et al. (2018). Transporters in drug development: 2018 ITC recommendations for transporters of emerging clinical importance. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 104(5): 890-899. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1112
Zeedan GS, Abdalhamed AM, Abdeen E, Ottai ME, and Abdel-Shafy S (2014). Evaluation of antibacterial effect of some Sinai medicinal plant extracts on bacteria isolated from bovine mastitis. Veterinary World, 7(11): 991-998. Available at: https://www. cabdirect. org/cabdirect/ab stract/20143414487
Zeedan GS, Abdalhamed AM, Ibrahim ES, and El-Sadawy HI (2018). Antibacterial efficacy of green silver nanoparticles against bacteria isolated from calf diarrhoea. Asian Journal of Epidemiology, 11(2): 65-73. Available at: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=aje.2018.65.73
56
