Some stability results for Picard iterative process in uniform space Текст научной статьи по специальности «Математика»

Владикавказский математический журнал 2010, Том 12, Выпуск 4, С. 67-72

SOME STABILITY RESULTS FOR PICARD ITERATIVE PROCESS IN UNIFORM SPACE

M. O. Olatinwo

We prove some stability results for Picard iteration in uniform space by introducing the concept of an

Me-distance as well as using some contractive conditions. Our results generalize, extend and improve some

earlier results.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 47H06, 54H25.

Key words: Picard iteration, uniform space, contractive conditions.

1. Introduction

The following concepts shall be required in the sequel:

Definition 1.1 [5, 27]. A uniform space (X, $) is a nonempty set X equipped with a nonempty family $ of subsets of X x X satisfying the following properties:

(i) if U is in $, then U contains the diagonal {(x, x) |x G X};

(ii) if U is in $ and V is a subset of X x X which contains U, then V is in $;

(iii) if U and V are in $, then U H V is in $;

(iv) if U is in $, then there exists V in $, such that, whenever (x, y) and (y, z) are in V,

then (x, z) is in U;

(v) if U is in $, then {(y, x) | (x, y) G U} is also in $.

$ is called the uniform structure of X and its elements are called entourages or neighbourhoods or surroundings.

The space (X, $) is called quasiuniform if property (v) is omitted.

The notions of an A-distance and an E-distance were introduced by Aamri and El Moutawakil [1] to prove some common fixed point theorems for some new contractive or

expansive maps in uniform space. In [1], the following contractive definition was employed:

Let f, g : X ^ X be selfmappings of X. Then, we have

p(f(x),f(y)) < ^(p(g(x),g(y))) (x,y G X), (i)

where ^ ^ R+ is a nondecreasing function satisfying

(i) for each t G (0, +ro), 0 < ^(t);

(ii) lim ^”(t) =0, t G (0, +ro).

n—

The function ^ satisfies also the condition ^(t) < t, for each t > 0.

Several stability results established in metric spaces and normed linear spaces are available in the literature, but to the best our knowledge, up till now, no stability result has been proved in uniform space. For excellent study of stability of the fixed point iterative procedures, we refer our readers to Ostrowski [20], Harder and Hicks [8], Rhoades [21, 23], Osilike [18], Osilike

© 2010 Olatinwo M. O.

and Udomene [19], Jachymski [17], Berinde [3, 4] and the papers of the author [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. Harder and Hicks [8], Rhoades [21, 23], Osilike [18], Osilike and Udomene [19] as well as Berinde [3] proved various stability results for certain contractive definitions. The first stability result on T-stable mappings was due to Ostrowski [20].

In this paper, our purpose is to obtain some stability results for Picard iteration in uniform space by introducing some new concept of stability in uniform space, notion of an Me-distance as well as using two contractive conditions which are more general than (1) above.

Our results are improvements, generalizations and extensions of some of the results of Harder and Hicks [8], Rhoades [21, 22], Osilike [18], Osilike and Udomene [19], Berinde [3, 4] as well as the recent results of the author [9, 10].

2. Preliminaries

Let (X, $) be a uniform space.

Remark 2.1. When topological concepts are mentioned in the context of a uniform space (X, $), they always refer to the topological space (X, t($)).

Definition 2.1 [1]. If V G $ and (x,y) G V, (y,x) G V, x and y are said to be V-close. A sequence {xn}~=Q C X is said to be a Cauchy sequence for $ if for any V G $, there exists N ^ 1 such that xn and xm are V-close for n, m ^ N.

Definition 2.2 [1]. A function p : X x X ^ R+ is said to be an A-distance if for any V G $, there exists 5 > 0 such that (x, y) G V wherever p(z,x) ^ 5 and p(z, y) ^ 5 for some z G X.

Definition 2.3 [1]. A uniform space (X, $) is said to be Hausdorff if the intersection of all V G $ reduces to the diagonal {(x,x)| x G X}, i. e. if (x, y) G V for all V G $ implies x = y. A surrounding V G $ is said to be symmetric if V = V-1 = {(y,x)|(x,y) G V}.

Definition 2.4 [1]. Let (X, $) be a uniform space and p be an A-distance on X.

(i) X is said to be S-complete if for every p-Cauchy sequence {xn}^=0, there exists x G X with limn—^ p(xn, x) = 0.

(ii) X is said to be p-Cauchy complete if for every p-Cauchy sequence {xn}^=o, there exists x G X with limn—ro xn = x with respect to t($).

Definition 2.5 [4]. A function ^^ R+ is called a comparison function if:

(i) ^ is monotone increasing;

(ii) lim ^n(t) = 0, V t ^ 0.

n—ro

Remark 2.2. Every comparison function satisfies the condition ^(0) = 0.

Also, both conditions (i) and (ii) imply that ^(t) < t for all t > 0.

Remark 2.3. A sequence in X is p-Cauchy if it satisfies the usual metric condition.

We shall employ the following contractive conditions: For a selfmapping T: X ^ X:

(i) there exist a G [0,1) and a monotone increasing function p: R+ ^ R+ such that p(0) = 0, and for all x, y G X,

p(Tx, Ty) ^ p(p(x, Tx)) + ap(x, y); (2)

(ii) there exist a continuous comparison function ^^ R+ and a monotone increasing function p: R+ ^ R+ such that p(0) = 0, and for all x, y G X, we have

p(Tx,Ty) ^ p(p(x,Tx)) + ^(p(x,y)).

(3)

Remark 2.4. The contractive condition (2) is more general than (1) in the sense that if in (2), p(u) = 0 for all u G R+, then we obtain (1) above.

Lemma 2.1 [3, 4]. If 5 is a real number such that 0 ^ 5 < 1, and {en}^=o is a sequence of positive numbers such that limn—ro en = 0, then for any sequence of positive numbers {un}“=o satisfying

un+1 ^ 5un + en, n = 0,1,2,...,

we have limn—ro un = 0.

In addition to the notions above, we shall state the following definitions of an Me-distance and stability of iterative process in a uniform space:

Lemma 2.2 [10, 15]. If ^: R+ ^ R+ is a subadditive comparison function and {en}^=0 is a sequence of positive numbers such that limn—ro en = 0, then for any sequence of positive numbers {un}£=o satisfying

m

Un+1 5fc (un) + 6n, n = 0, 1,...,

fc=0

where 50, 51,..., 5m G [0,1] with 0 ^ m=0 5fc ^ 1, we have limn—ro un = 0.

Definition 2.6. A function p: X x X ^ R+ is said to be an Me-distance if (p1 ) p is an A-distance;

(p2) p(x, y) ^ p(x, z) + p(z, y) for all x, y G X;

(p3) p(x, y) ^ p(y, x) for all x, y G X.

Remark 2.5. The function p: X x X ^ R+ is called an E-distance if p satisfies only the

properties (p1) and (p2). See Aamri and El Moutawakil [1] and Olatinwo [16] for more on the

concept of an E-distance.

Definition 2.7. Let (X, $) be a Hausdorff uniform space and p: X x X ^ R+ an Me-distance. Suppose that Fy = {u G X| Tu = u} = 0 is the set of the fixed points of T. Let {xn}-=0 C X be a p-Cauchy sequence generated by an iterative process involving T defined by

xn+1 = f (T,xn), n = 0,1, 2,..., (4)

where xo G X is an initial approximation and f is some function. Suppose that X is S-complete with respect to {xn}£=o, or X is p-Cauchy complete with respect to {xn}^=. Let {yn}^=o C X be an arbitrary p-Cauchy sequence and set en = p(yn+1, f (T, yn)), n = 0,1, 2,.... Then, the iterative process (4) is said to be T-stable or stable with respect to T if limn—ro en = 0 implies that X is S-complete with respect to {yn}^°=o, or X is p-Cauchy complete with respect to

{yn}£=0.

Remark 2.6. (i) Definition 2.7 reduces to that of Harder and Hicks [8] if p = d and X becomes a complete metric space and the notion of S-completeness or p-Cauchy completeness reduces to the concept of convergence in complete metric space.

(ii) If in (4),

xn+1 = f (T,xn)= Txn, xo G X, n = 0,1, 2,..., (5)

then we obtain the Picard iterative process.

3. Main Results

Theorem 3.1. Let (X, $) be a Hausdorff uniform space and p: X x X ^ R+ an Me-distance such that p(x',x') = 0 for some x' G R+. Let T: X ^ X be a selfmap of X satisfying the contractive condition (2) and p: R+ ^ R+ a monotone increasing function such that p(0) = 0. Let xo G X and {xn}^=o the Picard iterative process associated to T defined by (5). Suppose that T has a fixed point u and let X be S-complete with respect to {xn}^=o. Then, the Picard iterative process is T-stable.

< Let {yn}2=0 C X, en = p(yn+1,Tyn) and assume that lim en = 0. Then, we shall

n——^o

employ the properties of an Me-distance, condition (2) as well as Lemma 2.1 to establish that X is S-complete with respect to {yn}^=o. That is, we shall show that limn—ro p(yn, u) = 0, for some u G Ft C X:

p(yn+1,u) ^ p(yn+1,Tyn) + p(Tyn, Tu) = p(Tu,Tyn) + en (6)

^ p(p(u,Tu)) + ap(u, yn) + en = ap(yn, u) + en.

Since 0 ^ a < 1, Lemma 2.1 and (6) yield lim p(yn+1,u) = 0. Since limn—ro p(yn+1, u) = 0

n—ro

for some u G X, we conclude that X is S-complete with respect to {yn}^=o.

Conversely, let X be S-complete with respect to {yn}^°=o. Then, we prove that limn—ro en = 0. Again, by the properties of an Me-distance and condition (2) we have, for u G FT C X,

en = p(yn+1,Tyn) ^ p(yn+1,u) + p(Tu,Tyn)

^ p(yn+1 ,u) + p(p(u,Tu)) + ap(u,yn)= p(yn+1,u) + ap(u,yn) ^ 0 as n ^ to,

since X is S-complete with respect to {yn}^=o. So, it follows that limn—ro en = 0.

Hence, the Picard iterative process is T-stable. >

Remark 3.1. Theorem 3.1 is a generalization and extension of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 of Berinde [3], Theorem 1 of Osilike [18] (and same result in [19]), Theorem 1 of Rhoades [21, 23], Theorem 2 of Harder and Hicks [8] as well as Theorem 3.1 of the author [9]. Theorem 3.1 is further generalized to the following result:

Theorem 3.2. Let (X, $) be a Hausdorff uniform space and p: X x X ^ R+ an Me-distance such that p(x', x') = 0 for some x' G R+. Let T: X ^ X be a selfmap of X satisfying the contractive condition (3). Suppose also that ^: R+ ^ R+ is a continuous subadditive comparison function and p: R+ ^ R+ a monotone increasing function such that p(0) = 0. Let xo G X and {xn}^°=o the Picard iterative process associated to T defined by (5). Suppose that T has a fixed point u and let X be S-complete with respect to {xn}^°=o. Then, the Picard iterative process is T-stable.

< Again, let {yn}£=o C X, en = p(yn+1, Tyn) and assume that limn—ro en = 0. Then, by the properties of an Me-distance, condition (3) and Lemma 2.2, we have for some u G Ft C X :

p(yn+1,u) ^ p(Tu,Tyn) + en ^ ^(p(yn,u)) + en. (7)

By using Lemma 2.2 in (7), we get limn—rop(yn+1,u) = 0. Since limn—rop(yn+1,u) = 0 for some u G X, we deduce that X is S-complete with respect to {yn}^°=o.

Conversely, let X be S-complete with respect to {yn}^°=o. Then, for u G Ft C X, we have

en = p(yn+1,Tyn) ^ p(yn+1,u) + ^(p(u,yn)) ^ 0 as n ^ to,

since X is S-complete with respect to {yn}^=o. So, it follows that limn—ro en = 0.

Hence, the Picard iterative process is T-stable. >

Remark 3.2. Theorem 3.1 is a generalization and extension of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 of Berinde [3], Theorem 1 of Osilike [18] (and same result in [19]), Theorem 1 of Rhoades [21, 23], Theorem 2 of Harder and Hicks [8] as well as similar results of the author [9, 10].

Remark 3.3. The proof is similar when X is p-Cauchy complete with respect to {yn}^=o as S-completeness implies p-Cauchy completeness.

Remark 3.4. We obtain a direct extension of Theorem 1 of Osilike [18] if we replace the contractive conditions (2) and (3) in both Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2 by the following: there exist constants L ^ 0 and a G [0,1) such that for all x, y G X,

p(Tx, Ty) ^ Lp(x, Tx) + ap(x, y). (8)

References

1. Aamri M., Moutawakil D. E. Common fixed point theorems for E-contractive or E-expansive maps in uniform spaces // Acta Math. Acad. Paedagogicae Nyiregyhaziensis.—2004.—Vol. 20.—P. 83-91.

2. Banach S. Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur applications aux equations integrales // Fund. Math.—1922.—Vol. 3.—P. 133-181.

3. Berinde V. On the stability of some fixed point procedures // Bul. Stiint. Univ. Baia Mare. Ser. B, Matematica-Informatica.—2002.—Vol. 18, № 1.—P. 7-14.

4. Berinde V. Iterative approximation of fixed points.—Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007.—325 p.

5. Bourbaki N. Elements de mathematique. Fas. II. Livre III: Topologie generale (Chapter 1: Structures topologiques), (Chapter 2: Structures uniformes). Quatrieme Edition. Actualites Scientifiques et Industrielles, №. 1142, Hermann, Paris (1965).

6. Ciric Lj. B. A Generalization of Banach’s contraction principle // Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.—1974.— Vol. 45.—P. 267-273.

7. Ciric Lj. B. Some recent results in metrical fixed point theory.—Beograd: University of Belgrade, 2003.

8. Harder A. M., Hicks T. L. Stability results for fixed point iteration procedures // Math. Japonica.— Vol. 33, № 5.—P. 693-706.

9. Imoru C. O., Olatinwo M. O. On the stability of Picard and Mann iteration processes // Carp. J. Math.—2003.—Vol. 19, № 2.—P. 155-160.

10. Imoru C. O., Olatinwo M. O., Owojori O. O. On the stability results for Picard and Mann iteration procedures // J. Appl. Funct. Differ. Equ.—2006.—Vol. 1, № 1.—P. 71-80.

11. Olatinwo M. O., Owojori O. O., Imoru C. O. Some stability results on Krasnoselskij and Ishikawa fixed point iteration procedures // J. Math. Stat.—2006.—Vol. 2, № 1.—P. 360-362.

12. Olatinwo M. O., Owojori O. O., Imoru C. O. Some stability results for fixed point iteration processes // Aus. J. Math. Anal. Appl.—2006.—Vol. 3, № 2.—P. 1-7.

13. Olatinwo M. O. Some stability and strong convergence results for the Jungck-Ishikawa iteration process // Creative Math. & Inf.—2008.—Vol. 17.—P. 33-42.

14. Olatinwo M. O. Some stability results for two hybrid fixed point iterative algorithms of Kirk-Ishikawa and Kirk-Mann type // J. Adv. Math. Studies.—2008.—Vol. 1, № 1-2.—P. 87-96.

15. Olatinwo M. O. Some unifying results on stability and strong convergence for some new iteration processes // Acta Math. Academiae Paedagogicae Nyiregyhaziensis.—2009.—Vol. 25, № 1.—P. 105-118.

16. Olatinwo M. O. An extension of some common fixed point theorems for selfmappings in uniform space // J. of Concrete and Appl. Math.—2009.—Vol. 7, № 2.—P. 179-186.

17. Jachymski J. R. An extension of A. Ostrowski’s theorem on the round-off stability of iterations // Aequ. Math.—1997.—Vol. 53.—P. 242-253.

18. Osilike M. O. Some stability results for fixed point iteration procedures // J. Nigerian Math. Soc.— 1995.—Vol. 14-15.—P. 17-29.

19. Osilike M. O., Udomene A. Short proofs of stability results for fixed point iteration procedures for a class of contractive-type mappings // Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.—1999.—Vol. 30, № 12.—P. 1229-1234.

20. Ostrowski A. M. The round-off stability of iterations // Z. Angew. Math. Mech.—1967.—Vol. 47.—P. 7781.

21. Rhoades B. E. Fixed point theorems and stability results for fixed point iteration procedures // Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.—1990.—Vol. 21, № 1.—P. 1-9.

22. Rhoades B. E. Some fixed point iteration procedures // Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.—1991.—Vol. 14, № 1.— P. 1-16.

23. Rhoades B. E. Fixed point theorems and stability results for fixed point iteration procedures II // Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.—1993.—Vol. 24, № 11.—P. 691-703.

24. Rhoades B. E. A comparison of various definitions of contractive mappings // Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.—1977.—Vol. 226.—P. 257-290.

25. Rus I. A. Generalized contractions and applications.— Cluj Napoca: Cluj Univ. Press, 2001.

26. ZamSrescu T. Fix point theorems in metric spaces // Arch. Math.—1972.—Vol. 23.—P. 292-298.

27. Zeidler E. Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications, fixed-point theorems I.—New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.

Received July 10, 2009

Olatinwo M. O.

Department of Mathematics,

Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

ОБ УСТОЙЧИВОСТИ ИТЕРАЦИОННОГО ПРОЦЕССА ПИКАРА В РАВНОМЕРНЫХ ПРОСТРАНСТВАХ

Олатинво М. О.

Доказаны результаты об итерационном процессе Пикара в равномерных пространствах. С этой целью введены понятие Ме-расстояния и некоторые условия сжатия. Полученные факты обобщают, расширяют и улучшают некоторые ранее опубликованные результаты.

Ключевые слова: итерационный процесс Пикара, равномерные пространства, условия сжатия.