Научная статья на тему 'SOME ISSUES OF IMPROVING THE PROCEDURE FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE TRIAL'

SOME ISSUES OF IMPROVING THE PROCEDURE FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE TRIAL Текст научной статьи по специальности «Право»

CC BY
136
24
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
civil procedure / civil court / prosecutor / prosecutor's opinion / protest / judge / presentation / appeal protest / cassation protest

Аннотация научной статьи по праву, автор научной работы — Atalykova G., Khabibullaev D.

The article analyzes the grounds and procedure for the participation of the prosecutor in court, the opinion of the prosecutor, the protest of the prosecutor, the dispute and issues of the consistency and procedural equality of the parties. The positive experience of foreign countries in this area was also studied, suggestions and recommen-dations were made to improve the industry and legislation.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «SOME ISSUES OF IMPROVING THE PROCEDURE FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE TRIAL»

JURISPRUDENCE

SOME ISSUES OF IMPROVING THE PROCEDURE FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF THE

PROSECUTOR IN THE TRIAL

Atalykova G.

Teacher of the department "Civil law and civil process" Yuzhno-Kazakhstan State University named after M.Auezova, PhD.

Khabibullaev D.

Head of Department "Civil Procedure and economic procedural law " Tashkent State University Of Law, PhD, Professor

Abstract

The article analyzes the grounds and procedure for the participation of the prosecutor in court, the opinion of the prosecutor, the protest of the prosecutor, the dispute and issues of the consistency and procedural equality of the parties. The positive experience of foreign countries in this area was also studied, suggestions and recommendations were made to improve the industry and legislation.

Keywords: civil procedure, civil court, prosecutor, prosecutor's opinion, protest, judge, presentation, appeal protest, cassation protest.

The Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Additional Measures to Further Improve the Activity of Courts and Improve the Efficiency of Justice" signed on 24 July 2020 in order to bring the procedure of the prosecutor's participation in court proceedings in line with advanced international standards, the right of the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the Prosecutor General and their deputies to protest against court decisions, verdicts, rulings and decisions will be abolished.

In addition, the prosecutor may recall cases of judgments, decisions, rulings or decisions of the court that have entered into force, only in the presence of the parties' appeals, in civil and economic cases initiated by other persons in the courts, except as provided by law it was decided to exclude the participation of the prosecutor on his own initiative1.

In order to implement these priorities, in order to ensure the effectiveness and effectiveness of the parties, the prosecutor reconsiders the norms involving the principal of the prosecutor's participation in the court to further improve the principles. The performance is a requirement of the period.

Therefore, the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2021 According to the law, a number of additions and changes have been made to the norms related to the participation of the prosecutor in the civil procedure legislation. In particular, the second part of Article 50 of the Code of the Civil Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan was adopted in the new edition. According to him, the prosecutor shall have the right to participate in the hearing of the procurator, as well as the prosecutor only in the discussion of the civil case in the work on initiated. The prosecutor may not participate in the discussion of the

work discussed with applications of other persons on the discussion.

So, now prosecutors may not participate in the courts on their own initiative.

It is also excluded by Article 50 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan "The prosecutor has the right to participate in the initiative of other persons" excluded.

In this regard, the experience of foreign countries shows that prosecutors will mainly participate in the protection of the interests of the state and society. For example, in Germany, a prosecutor is not involved in civil, economic, administrative and administrative2. According to Article 27, the Law of the Russian Federation, the rights and freedoms of citizens were violated in the order of citizenship and administrative proceedings, in person in court and the arbitral tribunal protection If the rights and freedoms of a group of citizens are particularly social importance, the prosecutor shall provide a lawsuit and support the interests of victims in court or the arbitral tribunal3.

The specifics for the legislation of the Armenian Republic of Armenia is that the prosecutor shall hold mainly in the interests of the state. For example, according to Article 27, Armenia's "On Prosecutor's Office", the property's property is violated, or the official state body or official, or its requirement, will submit a law-suit4.

Law of the Republic of Belarus "On the Prosecutor's Office" As a written assignment of the higher prosecutor 45, the right prosecutor shall be involved in the

1 National Database of Legislation, 24.07.2020, No 06/20/6034/1103

2 Civil Procedural Code of the Federal Republic of Germany

// https://lawbook.online/protsess-zarubejnyih-grajdanskiy/

grajdanskiy-protsessualnyiy-kodeks-56683.html.

3 Federal law "On the Procuracy of the Russian Federation (in the edition of the Federal Law of November 17, 1995 N 168-FZ) (with changes on July 31, 2020) // http://docs.cntd.ru /document/9004584

4 Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Prosecutor's Office" // http://base.spinform.ru /show_doc.fwx?rgn=113216

implementation of civil, entrepreneurial or economic activities5.

In the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the procurator shall attend the prosecutor in the civil and economic process6.

In addition, one of the most important changes was reformed the recent institutes of judicial documents7. Control procedure was canceled. Violation and proceedings of the court of appellate, cassation, cassation complaint, cassation complaint, cassation complaint, censification complaint, censification complaint, censi-fication of the case, the government of the case of the court documents against court documents8. (protest), appointment of cassation appeal to repayment, suspension of cassation complaints, suspension of court documents, complaints of court documents, and participate in the case, The ruling of the court of cassation included new legal norms, such as the obligation of the court of cassation, such as costration procedure. Also, some of the procedural norms related to the court of appeal and cassation were adopted in a new edition.

Of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan Article 3851, the appeal (protest) may be submitted within one month from the date of its adoption. Of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Article 4051 The complaint (protest) may be submitted within the day of adoption within one year from the date of its adoption.

The court of the court of censification shall be given within three months after the expiry date of the issuance of the missed cassation period, and the missing period is recognized by the court, can be restored9.

A ruling on refusal to restore or recover the missed cassation complaint (protest) complaint.

If a copy of the Party to Appeal to Appeal to Appeal to the Work considered without the participation of the prosecutor, a copy of the appeal confirmed the party's case covenatory protest shall be attached (Articles 387, 407 of FPC).

Of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan Article 4071 The judge of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall have the right to work in the case of a cassation complaint (protest).

Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the provincial prosecutor, the provincial prosecutor, and their deputies, to request the case to address the relevant court to address the issue of civial procedure. The rightful is right. So, this rule means that other persons involved in the parties and the case, but the proof of law and obligations to protect the rights and legitiatures of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, as well as the representative to protect the rights and legitimate interests of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. In the event, the relevant subjects may request the case from the appropriate court to bring cu-cus.

In our opinion, it is expedient to improve some procedural norms related to the participation of prosecutor.

The First, in the first part of Article 50 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan "If the prosecutor is able to personally protect his rights, freedoms and legitimate interests. It is defined to refer to the court. In our opinion, it is advisable to exclude the words "or other causes" at the first part of this article. Because other causes of what is included in the law is not clear. This creates the right to appeal to the prosecutor on the desired ground. In addition, this norm makes it more different problems in judicial practice. Legal scientists have also expressed their opinion in research work10.

The Second, taking into account the controversy and equality of the parties in the procedural legislation, it is time to protest the prosecutor and revise the procedure for consideration of the prosecutor11. Because in many foreign countries, it includes a submission or petition. For example, Article 320 of the Civil Procurity Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, Article 323 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kyrgyz-stan, the prosecutor of the Republic of Turkmen Republic of Turkmen Republic of Turkmen Republic is entitled to enter a petitioner's request. According to Article 441 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the prosecutor has the right to appeal the appeal12. In this regard, A.Khayrulina13, A.Khakber-diev14, I.Salimova15 also put forward their scientific views.

5 Law of the Republic of Belarus "On the Prosecutor's Office" // https://pravo.by /document/?guid=3871&p0=H10700220

6 Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On the Prosecutor's Office" // https://online.zakon.kz /document/?doc_id=31690116

7 Ibratova F. B. et al. Special features of modern legal systems: cases and collisions. - 2017.

8 Ibratova F., Khabibullaev D. LEGAL ISSUES OF SIGNS OF BANKRUPTCY AND THE REALIZATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WORKERS IN CASES OF BANKRUPTCY OF EMPLOYERS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN //Znanstvena Misel. - 2019. - №. 11-2. - С. 55-61.

9 Барышова М. В. и др. Социальное предпринимательство: научные исследования и практика. - 2019.

10 Эсанова З. УЧАСТНИКИ ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЬНОГО

ПРОИЗВОДСТВА: ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКИЕ ПРАВИЛА И

АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ //Review of law

sciences. - 2020. - №. 3.

11 Ibratova F. B. et al. Legal Issues of Observation-Bankruptcy Procedures Applicable by the Economic Court of Uzbekistan //J. Advanced Res. L. & Econ. - 2019. - Т. 10. - С. 187.

12 The Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation // http://www.consultant.ru; Civil Procedure Code of the Kyr-gyz Republic // http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg; Civil Procedure Code of Turkmenistan // http://continent-online.com; Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan // https://online.zakon.kz

13 Хайрулина А. Б. МЕЖДУНАРОДНО-ПРАВОВЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ ЗАЩИТЫ ПРАВ ЖЕНЩИН В СИСТЕМЕ ООН //«Хукукий тадкикотлар» электрон журнали. -2019. - №. SPECIAL IS

14 Хакбердиев А. А. ЖИНОИЙ ИНСЦЕНИРОВКАДАГИ САЛБИЙ ХОЛАТЛАР //«Хукукий тадкикотлар» электрон журнали. - 2020. - №. SPECIAL 4.

15 Salimova I. M. The Concept Of Relevance In Civil And Economic Procedural Law And Its Relationship With Other

If we establish the ability to enter the application only if the prosecutor on this issue applies only to the court, we will think that this issue will be the most effective solution.

Third, in accordance with Article 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Article 11 of the Code of Economic Procedure, the principle of the crucial basis is strengthened on the basis of the controversy and equality of the parties16. However, the prosecutor's view of the prosecutor in the interests of the prosecutor in the case and the result of the work, although it is legitimate during the trial in court proceedings, will be subject to the principle of the equality of the parties17. Also, the prosecutor's opinion is also in a sense affects the independence of the court. You also need to think about this issue.

Fourth, in the theory and practice of procedural law, it is important to the principle of the principle of mutual competence of the parties. If we interpret noise in civil court proceedings, it is true that understanding all the activities of all proceedings in this process18. According to D. Khabibullaev, the development of the principle of library in court will strengthen the evidence and the process of proving. According to him, the parties substantiate their claims to the court in protecting their rights and interests19. But it is time to determine the act of forcingy participation of the controversy in the courts, ensuring the procedural equality of lawyers, and the prosecutor in civic, economic and administrative, to ensure mandatory participation in courts20. In this regard, the civil procedure of some countries strengthened the conditions for the parties in this regard, as well as the court to appoint a lawyer. For example, in Article 50 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, civil cases of the lawyer must be strengthened in Article 67 of the Civil Procedure of the Republic of Azerbaijan21.

Chapter 4, paragraph 78 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Federal Republic of Germany on this issue provides for the mandatory participation of a lawyer in the proceedings as a representative of the party. According to him, in the courts of landgerixtax and other high-riving instance, the parties will participate in

the lawyer, operate, work and introduce the parties is carried out through a lawyer. In family cases, persons participating in the parties and work will be introduced through the lawyers that can participate in court22.

According to D. Khabibullaev, the list of cases in which a lawyer must act as a contract representative in civil, economic and administrative cases in order to increase the effectiveness of the lawyer's participation in the implementation of the principle of dispute based on positive foreign experience, to ensure qualified legal assistance to those involved strengthening is desirable23. According to I. Salimova, the unification of the procedural rights and obligations of the prosecutor with the persons involved in the case will further guarantee the principle of dispute between the parties in practice24. According to Lawyer O. Pirmatov, economic and civil court tries to solve the case of a civil or economic court to his favor by presenting his demand and objections based on the principle of contribaries and objection. The decision of the court's decision in economic and civil lawsuates is inextricably linked to the evidence and the movement that the parties aimeds25.

In short, the unification of the prosecutor's participation in the court to ensure the principle of controversy and equality in the procedural law, participating in the proceedings in the case, guarantees of judicial proceedings, guarantees of civil proceedings increasing the legislation of the righteous judgment and the establishment of civil, economic and administrative law-suing laws in accordance with the general international norms and regulations.

REFERENCES:

1. National database of legislation, 24.07.2020 y., No 06/20/6034/1103

2. Civil Procedure Code of the Federal Republic of Germany // https://lawbook.online/protsess-za-rubejnyih-grajdanskiy/ grajdanskiy-protsessualnyiy-kodeks-56683.html.

3. Federal law "On the Procuracy of the Russian Federation (in the edition of the Federal Law of November 17, 1995 N 168-FZ) (with changes on July 31, 2020) // http://docs.cntd.ru /document/9004584

Legal Categories //Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government. - 2021. - Т. 27. - №. 1. - С. 362-369.

16 Ибратова Ф. Б. Гражданско-правовые проблемы признания банкротами индивидуальных предпринимателей в Республике Узбекистан //Вопросы современной юриспруденции. - 2015. - №. 5-6 (47).

17 Ibratova F. Problems of a settlement in bankruptcy cases in economic courts //Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science. - 2019. - №. 28-3.

18 Эсанова З. РОЛЬ ОТДЕЛЬНЫХ ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНЫХ ИНСТИТУТОВ В СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ: НА ПРИМЕРЕ ГРАЖДАНСКИХ ДЕЛ //Review of law sciences. - 2018. - №. 2.

19Khabibullaev D. Issues For Improving The First Instance Court Decisions On Civil Cases //European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. - 2020. - Т. 7. - №. 02. - С. 2020.

20Хабибуллаев Д. НЕКОТОРЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ

СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЯ ГРАЖДАНСКОГО

ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНОГО КОДЕКСА РЕСПУБЛИКИ

УЗБЕКИСТАН //Review of law sciences. - 2017. - Т. 1. -№. 1.

21 Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan. http://continent-online.com.

22 German Civil Procedure Code // https://law-book.online/protsess-zarubejnyih-grajdanskiy/grajdanskiy-protsessualnyiy-kodeks-56683.html.

23 Хабибуллаев Д. Ю. СУД БУЙРУГИНИ ТАКОМИЛЛАШТИРИШ БУЙИЧА АЙРИМ ФИКР-МУЛОХДЗАЛАР //«Хукукий тадкикртлар» электрон журнали. - 2019. - №. SPECIAL IS.

24 Salimova I. M. EXECUTIVE DOCUMENT-AN INDEPENDENT PROCEDURAL ACT OF ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS //Юридический факт. -2019. - №. 70. - С. 23-25.

25 Shavkatovich, Pirmatov Otabek. "THE PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CIVIL LITIGATION: EXPERIENCE OF UZBEKISTAN." PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 17.7 (2020): 9192-9199

4. Law of the Republic of Armenia "On Procuracy" // http://base.spinform.ru /show_doc.fwx?rgn=113216

5. Law of the Republic of Belarus "On Procuracy" // https://pravo.by /docu-ment/?guid=3871&p0=H10700220

6. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Procuracy" // https://online.zakon.kz /docu-ment/?doc_id=31690116

7. Ibratova F. B. et al. Special features of modern legal systems: cases and collisions. - 2017.

8. Ibratova F., Khabibullaev D. LEGAL ISSUES OF SIGNS OF BANKRUPTCY AND THE REALIZATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WORKERS IN CASES OF BANKRUPTCY OF EMPLOYERS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN //Znanstvena Misel. - 2019. - №. 112. - С. 55-61.

9. Барышова М. В. и др. Социальное предпринимательство: научные исследования и практика. - 2019.

10. Эсанова З. УЧАСТНИКИ ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЬНОГО ПРОИЗВОДСТВА: ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКИЕ ПРАВИЛА И АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ //Review of law sciences. - 2020. - №. 3.

11. Ibratova F. B. et al. Legal Issues of Observation-Bankruptcy Procedures Applicable by the Economic Court of Uzbekistan //J. Advanced Res. L. & Econ. - 2019. - Т. 10. - С. 187.

12. The Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation // http://www.consultant.ru; Civil Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic // http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg; Civil Procedure Code of Turkmenistan // http://continent-online.com; Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan // https://online.zakon.kz

13. Хайрулина А. Б. МЕЖДУНАРОДНО-ПРАВОВЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ ЗАЩИТЫ ПРАВ ЖЕНЩИН В СИСТЕМЕ ООН //«Хукукий тадкикотлар» электрон журнали. - 2019. - №. SPECIAL IS

14. Хакбердиев А. А. ЖИНОИЙ ИНСЦЕНИРОВКАДАГИ САЛБИЙ ХОЛАТЛАР //«Хукукий тадкикотлар» электрон журнали. -2020. - №. SPECIAL 4.

15. Salimova I. M. The Concept Of Relevance In Civil And Economic Procedural Law And Its Relationship With Other Legal Categories //Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government. - 2021. - Т. 27. - №. 1. - С. 362-369.

16. Ибратова Ф. Б. Гражданско-правовые проблемы признания банкротами индивидуальных предпринимателей в Республике Узбекистан //Вопросы современной юриспруденции. - 2015. - №. 56 (47).

17. Эсанова З. РОЛЬ ОТДЕЛЬНЫХ ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНЫХ ИНСТИТУТОВ В СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ: НА ПРИМЕРЕ ГРАЖДАНСКИХ ДЕЛ //Review of law sciences. -2018. - №. 2.

18. Ibratova F. Problems of a settlement in bankruptcy cases in economic courts //Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science. - 2019. - №. 28-3.

19. Khabibullaev D. Issues For Improving The First Instance Court Decisions On Civil Cases //European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine. -2020. - Т. 7. - №. 02. - С. 2020.

20. Хабибуллаев Д. НЕКОТОРЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЯ ГРАЖДАНСКОГО ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНОГО КОДЕКСА РЕСПУБЛИКИ УЗБЕКИСТАН //Review of law sciences. - 2017. - Т. 1. - №. 1.

21. Civil Procedural Code of the Republic of Azerbaij an. http ://continent-online.com.

22. Civil Procedure Code of Germany // https://lawbook.online/protsess-zarubejnyih-grajdan-skiy/grajdanskiy-protsessualnyiy-kodeks-56683.html.

23. Хабибуллаев Д. Ю. СУД БУЙРУЕИНИ ТАКОМИЛЛАШТИРИШ БУЙИЧА АЙРИМ ФИКР-МУЛОХ,АЗАЛАР //«Хукукий тадкикотлар» электрон журнали. - 2019. - №. SPECIAL IS.

24. Salimova I. M. EXECUTIVE DOCUMENT-AN INDEPENDENT PROCEDURAL ACT OF ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS //Юридический факт. - 2019. - №. 70. - С. 23-25.

25. Shavkatovich, Pirmatov Otabek. "THE PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CIVIL LITIGATION: EXPERIENCE OF UZBEKISTAN." PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 17.7 (2020): 9192-9199

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.