CC BY
20
Siddiqov Ilyosjon Bakhromovich, teacher of Fergana State University, the Republic of Uzbekistan, E-mail: gulchehra_3@mail.ru,
SOCIAL AND PHILISOPHICAL PERFORMANCE OF MAKING YOUTH'S INTELLECTUAL CULTURE
Abstract: This article is devoted to the socio-philosophical problems of the formation of intellectual culture components of the youth, their organizational, methodological, psychological and social factors in social development. It also discusses the socio-philosophical content of the intellectual culture problem, the development of the intellectual culture of young people in the context of social development, and its impact on the development of civilization.
Keywords: youth, intellectual, culture, science, intellectual culture, intellectual capital, innovative ideas, intellectual abilities, structure of intellectual culture, intellectual cultural functions.
Intellectual culture is the ability to designate goals and objectives of the gnoseological activity, which is based on human intelligence, planning skills, developing diverse intellectual capabilities, working with sources of knowledge and information and technology.
The main functions of 'Intellectual Culture' are followers: gnoseological, humanistic, communicative, informative, educational and social normative. According to the system of methodological knowledge, developing of intellectual culture has axiological, technological, personal-creative and cognitive components. It turns out that a person creates new ideas through creative thinking, puts various problems and solves them, solves their specific solutions, and sometimes finds unique approaches, methods, and methods to such solutions. The creative nature of the person's mind provides his socialization.
It is important to pay special attention to the socio-philo-sophical aspects of organizational, methodological and moral factors of formation of intellectual culture in young people. Prior to addressing these issues, it is desirable to focus on the peculiarities of the formation of intellectual culture.
Research shows that the parents, teachers and educators of the great talented people were also talented, creative people. For instance, Alisher Navoi's family and his ability to memorize many poems from his childhood, A. S. Pushkin 'snanny Arina Radionovna made them get lots of achievements.
Margaret Munnerlyn Mitchell, the author ofwell-known novel 'Gone with the Wind', remembers that her mother gave her 'cash prize' for reading and re-telling the main meaning of books, and the higher 'payment', the more complex work. That fact influenced on her future becoming a great writer.
Human's spiritual and intellectual features are based on their education and the environment which they live in. A well-planned educational system in a family is a base of being well-educated at school, by contrast, if there is no necessary
bringing-updeeds in a family, it causes to many problems in school educational work.
It is vital that there should be very close and loyal, natural and simple, warm relationship between children and educators in a family, and should not be any type of formality. It is the main stage of formatting primitive intellectual cultural components in the youth in a family.
It is essential to create initial componentsof culture, which are acts of thought, in a family such as different vital experiences and scientific knowledge, skill of distinguishing, comparing, adding, dividing, abstracting, sequencing a number of complexes of information and news in the youth.
Because the spiritual consciousness of young people depends on the development of society in a certain intellectual field, as well as on the spiritual and cultural level of the particular family. The most important component of spiritual consciousness can be expressed as intellectual behavior and its three forms:
Firstly, a verbal intellect, which refers to the word, the erudition, the meaning of understanding the readers;
Secondly, the ability to solve problems;
Thirdly, the capacity to implement the set goals [1].
Thus, the intellect is the ability of a person to reach a certain level of understanding, thinking activity, which enables the individual to acquire new knowledge and effectively use them in his work. It is the basis of people's knowledge and behaviour (rationality)in a society. Like these skills must be formed in a family. Elders should give youngers lots of puzzles, do different intellectual games, which increase youngers' ability of thinking, and also they have to listen to youngers' ideas though they are very simple, encourage youngers' working skills, appreciate their own working or gaming results.
It is very theoretical-methodologically important to focus on 'intellectual potential', which is a main part of intellectual culture when we discuss about intellectual culture.
SOCIAL AND PHILISOPHICAL PERFORMANCE OF MAKING YOUTH'S INTELLECTUAL CULTURE
Being contrast to intellectual resource, intellectual potential refers a set of intellectual-creative abilities, although they are hidden, not officially noted, they are a real basis for any activity. Therefore, a subject must have a complex set of complex mental functions that will facilitate the acting of the functions of execution, implementation, and performance of a particular activity, i.e., the study of the subject of mental work [2]. That is why researcher Michael Polani states that'individual knowledge requires intellectual potential. It's not just about being of knowledge, but the person who seeks to know, his or her interest in knowledge, personal approach to interpretation and use of the information, and his or her perception of it [3].
The problem of skill has always attracted the attention of thinkers and philosophers of all time, as a human being is a researching object for many subjects, ability is also considered as that object.
The talent is the functional uniqueness of the human anatomical-physiological nature of the human brain, the nervous system, the emotional and behavior, and the basis of the development of organism's ability. People are inherently different in nature and form the basis of their abilities. Person's ability, which has not developed, could be forgotten.
The structure of intellectual skills has followers: the talent are the genetic base of ability; common abilities such as learning, attention, memory, imagination, role, hard working, appear in the same way in different type of human activities; specific abilities such as musical, mathematical, organizational ones, which appear in some kind of activities; social abilities, which are divided into groups and developed by common and special talents; professional abilities, which are involved in the selection of profession, specialty and labour activity [4].
Owners of creative abilities have the power to provide the vitality of a particular society. Moreover, the younger generation, with its creativity, becomes the vital force of the society. On the contrary, in social non-active people collapse destroying power of real being. In this sense, the idea that high creative ability is inherent in a person is not true according to us.The generation has a role to play in the formation of the talent.But in today's philosophical studieshas been discovered that children of unique creators did not have this ability and, on the contrary, had a lot of cases where many talented were born from parents who did not have this ability.This demonstrates that creativity is actually present in everyone, but this capability is often abandoned. Of course, this issue seems to be superficial, but in fact it is a very complex process that requires extensive specialized knowledge.
The experiences of social, economic, political and professional activities confirm that the only intellectual capacity of a human being to find place in society, family, or social groups is not sufficient. The growing generation must be able to have
a high level of thinking, skills and high intelligence about the future development of the society, which has a sense of indifference for the fate of its country and its people, from the old thinking effect. This is firstly.
Secondly, it is a great task to upbringing and harmonizing a comprehensively advanced generation that has become our main goal and task to form a society that has a high intellectual base.
According to sociological psychological research, further advancement in the education and upbringing of gifted and intellectually gifted children is largely based on the essence of psychological terms that describe the abilities of parents, educators, teachers and the general public, and their specific developmental laws on scientific basis and that they are closely connected with their understanding.
The effectiveness of each case is closely interconnected with the understanding of the physical and psychological guidelines for a thorough understanding of the essence of the matter and its precise realization before it begins. This is, of course, solved based on the intellectual capacity of the person performing the task. The views that the ability to pass through a genealogy through the heredity is contrary to scientific theories. The rise of intellectual capacity of each person's mental development, including his talent, is governed by socio-historical principles. Ability to develop depends on the social conditions that initially emerges in the child's needs, interests, and directions. In this regard, from the lower stages of the education system, it is necessary to focus on the development of intellectual potential youth:
- intellectual competence, including the broad vision of the person, the intellectual preparation ready for vital activity in the society, the system of intellectual universality;
- a system of intellectual abilities and intellectual abilities, based on them;
- a system of concepts formed on the basis of self-reflection;
- a system of important attributes that can be adapted to the intellectual system [5].
The rise of intellectual culture in young people requires the creation of the ability to overcome contradictions on the path to creative thinking. These difficulties include followers:
- conformism, the desire to be like others; a person is afraid to declare extraordinary ideas in order to avoid laughing or foolishness to others;
- control censorship (in particular hidden senses or self-criticism), that is, people who are usually afraid of the consequences of their ideas can never be innovators [6]; there must be some kind of equality between the individual's ability and self-criticism, and the excessive humour of his talent can lead to creative disintegration;
- fear of human activity, that is the loss of luck and initiative;
- inability to adapt to social reality; this is a turmoil in changing the way they work in extreme conditions;
- striving to find ways of implementing a new task in certain social conditions; but excessively high motivation often leads to unreasonable decisions.
Based on the above, the following conclusions can be made:
1. Creating and introducing a socio-psychological mechanism to study the intellectual culture of youth, which is formed in the form of ability, talent, abilities and talents formed on the basis of physical and psychological development laws.
2. Creating the most appropriate courses for young people to get acquainted with parents, educators, teachers, and even the general public through the intellectual culture and its development laws.
3. By studying the intellectual potential of each of the younger generations through socio-spiritual and psycho-di-
agnostic methods, and developing a unique curriculum and system for it.
4. Creating a system for the broad introduction of innovation, and scientifically-based solutions to the development of intellectual capabilities of young people with the impact of individualized teaching and learning.
5. Talent formation in a person is connected with high level of knowing, thought, intellectual developing. That's why it is necessary to be able to anticipate the skills and talent skills of the person and to direct them in the right direction.
6. Intellectual culture is formed with knowing human being and the world, appreciating them. It is vital to develop youngers' thinking activity and extend it basing above mentioned. Because that may give an opportunity to bring up our youngers as free and independent, self-conscious, self-aware ones, who are skilled, political-aware one, who can stay against different branches, who are loyal to our motherland interests.
References:
1. Зиновьев А. Высшее образование и логика интеллекта / А. Зиновьев // Almamater. 2004.- № 5.- С. 11-15.
2. Шипунова О. Д. Интеллект и субъективность (Социально-философский анализ): Дис. ... д-ра филос. наук. - Санкт-Петербург, 2004.- 354 с.
3. Полани М. Личностное знание. На пути к посткритической философии. Перевод с английского.- М.: Прогресс, 1985.- 344 с.
4. Иншаков О. Интеллектуальный фактор инновационной деятельности. МЗ РСФР, Волгоград. гос. ун-т.- Волгоград. 2003.- 118 с.
5. Пономарева Е. Инновация как научная и политическая проблема / Е. Пономарева, А. Никифорова // Свободная мысль. 2011.- № 1.- С. 29-44.
6. Старжинский В. П. Динамика науки и инновационное развитие: пособие для магистрантов и аспирантов / В. П. Стар-жинский, В. В. Цепкало.- Минск: БНТУ, 2013.- 389 с.
