CC BY
59
Редакционная статья
Severe chronic allergic (and related) diseases: a uniform approach — a MeDALL-GA2LEN-ARIA Position Paper
In collaboration with the WHO Collaborating Center for Asthma and Rhinitis
J. Bousquet*/**/ **VW1/2, j.m. Anto*/**/3/4/5/6, P. Demoly*/***/$/7/s, H.J. Schunemann*/***/9, A. Togias10,
M. Akdis*/**/11, C. Auffray**/12, C. Bachert*/**/***/13, T. Bieber*/14, P.J. Bousquet*/***/$/1, K.H. Carlsen*/**/***/15, T.B. Casale***/16, A.A. Cruz***/17, T. Keil*/**/18, K.C. Lodrup-Carlsen*/**/***/15, M. Maurer*/**/***/19,
K. Ohta***/20, N.G. Papadopoulos*/***/21, M. Roman Rodriguez22, B. Samolinski***/23, I. Agache***/24,
A. Andrianarisoa^25, I. Annesi-Maesano*/**/***/26, F. Ballester27, C.E. Baena-Cagnani***/28/29,
X. Basagana**/3/4/5, E.D. Bateman***/30, E.H. Bel*/31, A. Bedbrook*/**/ ***/$/7, B. Beghue***/32, M. Beji^33,
A. Ben Kheder***/€/34, M. Benet**/3/4/5, K.S. Bennoor**/35, K.C. Bergmann*/***/19, F. Berrissoul€/36,
C. Bindslev Jensen*/**/ ***/37, G. Bleecker38, S. Bonini*/***/39, A.L. Boner40, L.P. Boulet***^41,
C.E. Brightling42, J.L. Brozek***/9, A. Bush43, W.W. Busse44, P.A.M. Camargos***/45, G.W. Canonica*/***/46,
W. Carr***/47, A. Cesario48/49, Y.Z. Chen***/50, A. Chin-Suorn^36, A. Chiriac***/1, D.J. Costa***/51, L. Cox52,
A. Custovic***/53, R. Dahl***/54, U. Darsow*/55, T. Didi^55A, W.K. Dolen56, H. Douagui***/57,
R. Dubakiene**/***/58, A. El-Meziane€/59, J. Fonseca***/60, W.J. Fokkens*/***/61, E. Fthenou**/62,
A. Gamkrelidze***/63, J. Garcia-Aymerich**/3/4/5/6, R. Gerth van Wijk***/64, E. Gimeno**/3,
S. Guerra**/3/4/5/64A, T. Haahtela*/**/***/65, H. Haddad€/66, P. Hellings***/67, B. Hellquist-Dahl***/54,
C. Hohmann*/**/18, P. Howarth*/***/68, J.O. Hourihane69, M. Humbert***/70, B. Jacquemin*/2/71, J. Just72,
0. Kalayci***/73, M.A. Kaliner74, F. Kauffmann*/**/2/71, M. Kerkhof**/75, G. Khayat^76, B. Koffi N'Goran***^77, M. Kogevinas**/3/4/5/77A, G.H. Koppelman**/78, M.L. Kowalski*/**/***/79, I. Kull*/**/80/81, P. Kuna***/82,
D. Larenas***/83, I. Lavi**/3, L.T. Le***/84, P. Lieberman85, B. Lipworth***/86, B. Mahboub***/87,
M.J. Makela*/**/***/65, F. Martin^88, F.D. Martinez**/89, G.D. Marshall90, A. Mazon^27, E. Melen*/**/91,
E.O. Meltzer***/92, F. Mihaltan***/€/93, Y. Mohammad***/€/94, A. Mohammadi^95, I. Momas**/96,
M. Morais-Almeida***/97, J. Mullol*/***/98, A. Muraro99, R. Naclerio***/100, S. Nafti^101,
L. Namazova-Baranova*/***/102, M.C. Nawijn**/103, D. Nyembue***/104, S. Oddie**/105/106, R. O'Hehir***/107,
Y. Okamoto108, M.P. Orru***/109, C. Ozdemir***/110, G.S. Ouedraogo***/111, S. Palkonen*/**/***/112,
P. Panzner***/113, G. Passalacqua*/***/46, R. Pawankar***/114, B. Pigearias^115, I. Pin**/116/117, M. Pinart**/3, C. Pison*/**/118/119/120, T.A. Popov***/121/122, D. Porta**/123, D.S. Postma**/124, D. Price***/125, K.F. Rabe***/126,
J. Ratomaharo^127, S. Reitamo*/**/65, D. Rezagui€/128, J. Ring*/***/129, R. Roberts130, J. Roca***/131,
B. Rogala*/***/132, A. Romano*/***/133, J. Rosado-Pinto***/134, D. Ryan135/136, M. Sanchez-Borges***/137,
G.K. Scadding***/138, A. Sheikh139, F.E.R. Simons***/140, V. Siroux**/141/142, P. Schmid-Grendelmeier*/***/143,
H.A. Smit**/144, T. Sooronbaev***/145, R.T. Stein3/145A, P.J. Sterk***/31/127, J. Sunyer***/3/4/5/6,
1. Terreehorst*/***/146, E. Toskala*/**/***/147, Y. Trembla^148, R. Valenta*/**/149, D. Valeyre€/150,
O. Vandenplas***/151, C. van Weel***/152, M. Vassilaki**/62, R. Varraso*/2/71, G. Viegi*/***/153, D.Y. Wang***/154,
M. Wickman*/**/155, D. Williams***/156, S. Wohrl*/157, J. Wright*/**/105, A. Yorgancioglu***/158,
O.M. Yusuf***/159, H.J. Zar***/160, M.E. Zernotti***/28, M. Zidarn161, N. Zhong***/162, T. Zuberbier*/**/***/19/163
* — Member of GA2LEN (Global Allergy and Asthma European Network, Grant Agreement FP6)
** — Member of MeDALL (Mechanisms of the Development of ALLergy, Grant Agreement FP7 N°264357, MeDALL paper N°5)
*** — Member of ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma)
$ — WHO Collaborating Center for Asthma and Rhinitis (Montpellier)
— Espace Francophone de Pneumologie (Societe de Pneumologie de Langue Francaise)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55 55A
56
57
University Hospital, Department of Respiratory Diseases, Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France Inserm, CESP Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Respiratory and Environmental Epidemiology team, Villejuif, France
Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain Municipal Institute of Medical Research (IMIM-Hospital del Mar), Barcelona, Spain CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain HO Collaborating Center for Asthma and Rhinitis, Montpellier, France
University Hospital of Montpellier — Inserm U657, Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
Functional Genomics and Systems Biology for Health, CNRS Institute of Biological Sciences, Villejuif, France
RL (Upper Airways research Laboratory), University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
University of Oslo; Oslo University Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Oslo, Norway
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
ProAR — FMB, Federal University of Bahia School of Medicine, Salvador, Brazil
Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charite — Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Allergy-Centre-Charite at the Dept. of Dermatology, Charite — University Medicine Berlin, Germany
Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo,
Japan
Allergy Dpt, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Greece
on Pisa Primary Care Centre, IB-Salut Balearic Health Service, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania
Public Hospital Medical Service, Ministry of Health, Antananarivo, Madagascar
EPAR U707 INSERM, Paris; EPAR UMR-S UPMC, Paris VI, Paris France
University of Valencia and Center for Public Health Research (CSISP), Valencia, Spain
Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University, Cordoba, Argentina;
School of Specialization, Respiratory Medicine, University of Genoa, Italy Health Sciences Faculty, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Department of Pulmonology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Divisions of Human Genetics Infection, Inflammation and Repair, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
Service de Pneumologie Allergologie, Centre Hositalo-Universitaire de la Rabta, Tunis, Tunisia
Hopital A Mami, Ariana, Tunisia
National Institute of Diseases of Chest & Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
IR KHMER, Cambodia
Odense University Hospital — Denmark
Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
Institute of Neurobiology and Molecular Medicine — CNR, Rome, Italy and Department of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
Department of Paediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Institut de cardiologie et de pneumologie de l'Hopital Laval and Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada Institute for Lung Health, Leicester, UK
Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital and National Heart and Lung Institute,
Imperial College, London, UK
Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; George R. and Elaine Love Professor, Chair — Dept of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
Dept of Pediatrics, Medical School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Allergy & Respiratory Diseases, DIMI, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
Southern California Research, Mission Viejo, California, USA
Deputy Scientific Director, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Roma, Italy and
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
National Cooperative Group of Pediatric Research on Asthma. Asthma Clinic and Education Center of the apital Institute of Pediatrics, Peking, China Center for Asthma Research and Education, Beijing, P. R. China Primary Care Dept., Montpellier I University, France
Nova Southeastern University Osteopathic College of Medicine, Davie, Florida, USA University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, Technische Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany Service de pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier de la Region d'Annecy, Annecy, France Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
Service de pneumo-allergologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Beni-Messous, Algiers, Algeria
nEflMATPMHECKAfl ^APMAKOflOrMfl /2011/ TOM 8/ № 4
Редакционная статья
58 Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Lithuania, GA2LEN collaborating centre
59 Societe Marocaine des Maladies Respiratoires, BP1828, Derb Ghellaf, Casablanca, Maroc AND Centre of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Centre commercial Nadia, Casablanca, Maroc
60 Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Department & CINTESIS, and Allergy Division, Porto University, Portugal; Allergy, Hospital S. Joao & Instituto, CUF; CINTESIS, Porto University Medical School
61 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
62 Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
63 HO CO in Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia
64 Section of Allergology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands 64A University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
65 Department of Dermatology, Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland
66 Association Franco-Libanaise de Pneumologie (AFLP) and Service de pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier Tarbes- Lourdes, Bigorre, France
67 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
68 University of Southampton, England
69 University College Cork, Ireland, UK
70 Universite Paris-Sud, Service de Pneumologie, Hopital Antoine-Beclere, Clamart, France
71 University Paris Sud 11, UMRS 1018, Villejuif, France
72 Groupe Hospitalier Trousseau-La Roche-Guyon, Centre de l'Asthme et des Allergies, APHP, Universite Paris 6, France
73 Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Pediatric Allergy and Asthma Unit, Hacettepe, Ankara, Turkey
74 George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington DC — Institute for Asthma and Allergy, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
75 Department of Epidemiology, GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
76 Service de Pneumologie, Hotel-Dieu de France & Faculte de Medecine, Universite Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth, Liban
77 Service des Maladies Respiratoires, Centre Hospitaliere Universitaire, Abidjan, Ivory Coast 77A Department of Nutrition, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece
78 Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
79 Department of Immunology, Rheumatology and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
80 Centre for Allergy Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
81 Department of Clinical Science and Education, Sodersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
82 Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
83 Allergy Department, Hospital Medica Sur, Mexicocity, Mexico
84 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hochiminh City, Vietnam
85 Unversity of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis Tennessee, USA
86 Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Univeristy of Dundee, UK
87 Pulmonary and allergy unit, Dubai Health Authority and University of Sharjah, UAE
88 Compiegnes, Association Franco-Vietnamienne de Pneumologie
89 Arizona Respiratory Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
90 Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS USA
91 Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
92 Allergy & Asthma Medical Group & Research Center, University of California, San Diego, USA
93 Institute of Pneumology Marius Nasta, Bucharest, Romania
94 Tishreen University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medecine, Lattakia, Syria
95 Association Franco-Marocaine de Pathologie Thoracique (AFMAPATH), Marrakech, Morocco
96 Paris Descartes University, Department of Public health and biostatistics, EA 4064 and Paris municipal Department of social action, childhood, and health, Paris, France
97 Immunoallergy Department, CUF-Descobertas Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
98 Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS. Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
99 Department of Pediatrics — University of Padua, Padua, Italy
100 Professor and Chief of OHNS, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
101 Mustapha Hospital, Algiers, Algeria
102 Scientific Center for Children's Health RAMS, Moscow, Russia
103 Laboratory of Allergology and Pulmonary Diseases, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
104 Kinshasa University, Congo
105 Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
106 Bradford Neonatology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
107 Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
108 Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
109 Pharmacist, Italy
110 Marmara University, Seher, Yildizi Sokak 16/10 Etiler, Istanbul, Turkey
111 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pediatrique Charles de Gaulle, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, West Africa
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120 121 122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145 145A
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
FA European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients' Associations, Brussels, Belgium
Charles University Prague, Medical School and Hospital in Plzen, Dept. of Allergy and Clin. Immunology, Plzen, Czech
Republic
Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
NICE and Societe de Pneumologie de Langue Francaise, France
HU de Grenoble;
INSERM, U823, Institut Albert Bonniot, Grenoble; University Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Grenoble;
Inserm 884;
University of Grenoble, France
Clinic of Allergy and Asthma, Medical University Sofia, Bulgaria Clinic of Allergy
Asthma, Alexander's University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service Lazio Region, Rome, Italy
Department of Pulmonology, GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen,
Groningen, The Netherlands
GPIAG, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands PNEUMALGA and Societe de Pneumologie de l'Ocean Indien Association Franco-Algerienne de Pneumologie (AFAP)
Technische Universitat Munchen — Germany
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, USA
Institut Clinic del Torax, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
Silesian University School of Medicine, Zabrze, Poland
Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, UCSC-Allergy Unit, Complesso Integrato Columbus, Rome, Italy Immunoallergy Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal Hospital Dona Estefania, Lisboa, Portugal Woodbrook Medical Centre, Loughborough, England Clinical Research Fellow, University of Aberdeen, Scotland
Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Centro Medico-Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, Venezuela Royal National TNE Hospital, University College London, UK
Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Edinburgh, UK Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Canada
INSERM, U823, Team of Environmental Epidemiology applied to Reproduction and Respiratory Health, Grenoble; Universite Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
Allergy Unit, Dept. of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zuerich, Switzerland
Julius Center of Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
National Centre Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidade Catolica RGS, Porto Alegre, RS — Brazil Dept of ENT and Paediatrics, AMC hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Axis in Reproduction, Perinatal and Child Health, Faculty of medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Allergy Research, Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Universite Paris 13, PRES Sorbonne-Paris-Cite and Assistance publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Avicenne hospital, Bobigny, France
University Hospital of Mont-Godinne, Catholic University of Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, HB Nijmegen,
The Netherlands
CNR Institutes of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology (IBIM), Palermo, and of Clinical Physiology (IFC), Pisa, Italy Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Republic of Singapore
Sachs' Children's Hospital, Stockholm; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Dermatology, Division of Immunology, Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DIAID), Wien, Austria
Celal Bayar University School of Medicine Dept. of Pulmonology, Manisa, Turkey he Allergy & Asthma Institute, Islamabad, Pakistan
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa School of Child and Adolescent Health, Red Cross Childrens Hospital, University of Cape Town, South Africa University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Slovenia
Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Diseases and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou, China
Secretary General of the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN), Network of Excellence, Charite — Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
nEflMATPMHECKAfl ^APMAKOflOrMfl /2011/ TOM 8/ № 4
Редакционная статья
Correspondence:
Jean Bousquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Montpellier
34295-Montpellier-Cedex 05, phone: +33-611-42-88-47, email: [email protected] Accepted: 31.07.2011 r., submitted for publication: 05.08.2011 r.
Concepts of disease severity, activity, control and responsiveness to treatment are linked but different. Severity refers to the loss of function of the organs induced by the disease process or to the occurrence of severe acute exacerbations. Severity may vary over time and needs regular follow up. Control is the degree to which therapy goals are currently met. These concepts have evolved over time for asthma in guidelines, task forces or consensus meetings. The aim of this paper is to generalize the approach of the uniform definition of severe asthma presented to WHO for chronic allergic and associated diseases (rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic urticaria, atopic dermatitis) in order to have a uniform definition of severity, control and risk, usable in most situations. It is based on the appropriate diagnosis, availability and accessibility of treatments, treatment responsiveness and associated factors such as co-morbidities and risk factors. This uniform definition will allow a better definition of the phenotypes of severe allergic (and related) diseases for clinical practice, research (including epidemiology), public health purposes, education and the discovery of novel therapies.
Key words: IgE, allergy, severity, control, risk, asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, urticaria, atopic dermatitis.
Abbreviations
ACQ: Asthma Control Questionnaire
ACT: Asthma Control Test
AD: Atopic dermatitis
ARIA: Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma
ATS: American Thoracic Society
CRS: Chronic rhinosinusitis
CRSsNP: Chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps
CRSwNP: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
EASI: Eczema Area and Severity Index
EPR3: Expert report 3
ERS: European Respiratory Society
FP: Framework Programme
GA2LEN: Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (FP6)
GINA: Global initiative for asthma
LMIC: Low and middle-income country
MeDALL: Mechanisms of the Development of Allergy (FP7)
NAEPP: National Asthma Education Prevention Program
POEM: Patient-oriented Eczema Measure
SCORAD: SCORing Atopic Dermatitis SCUAD: Severe chronic upper airway disease
U-BIOPRED: Unbiased BIOmarkers for the PREDiction of respiratory disease outcomes VAS: Visual analogue scale
WAO: World Allergy Organiztion
WHO: World Health Organization
INTRODUCTION
Allergic diseases represent the world's most common diseases. Several mechanisms are involved, but many patients suffer from IgE-mediated reactions [1]. Over 400 million people suffer from allergic rhinitis and 300 from asthma [2]. Up to 50% of the population in certain age groups and countries are sensitized to allergens. Not all sensitized patients are symptomatic [3] and symptom severity varies widely from mild to severe and from intermittent to persistent. Most patients have an early onset of symptoms but the clinical phenotypes of allergic diseases vary with age [4].
Acute, IgE-mediated, severe reactions (e. g. anaphylaxis [5]) occurring in patients sensitized to drugs [6], foods [7] or hymenoptera venoms [8] may be life-threatening. Many types of acute non-IgE-mediated allergic diseases or non-allergic diseases [1] such as aspirin hypersensitivity, hereditary angioedema [9], cold urticaria [10] or skin reactions such as DRESS (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) or Lyell syndrome [11] may also be life-threatening. Acute allergic (and related) diseases will not be considered in this document.
Major IgE-mediated chronic diseases include rhinitis (and conjunctivitis) [12], asthma [2], atopic dermatitis [13] and gastro-intestinal diseases. However, allergy is not always involved [14-17]. Diseases such as contact dermatitis are linked with other immune reactions. The present document will propose the definition of the severity of allergic and related (non-allergic origin) diseases: asthma, rhinitis (conjunctivitis), rhinosinusitis [18, 19], atopic
dermatitis and chronic urticaria [20, 21]. However, the list will be expanded later.
Co-morbidities play a major role in severity adding to the complexity of the disease and its management [12]. However, in the current document, each disease will be considered separately since there may be patients with a severe disease (e. g. rhinitis) associated to a milder one (e. g. asthma). Concepts of disease severity, activity, control and responsiveness to treatment are linked. Severity refers to the loss of function of the organs induced by the disease process. It may vary over time and needs regular follow up. Activity refers to the current level of activation of the biological network perturbations that cause the disease and their clinical consequences. Control is the degree to which therapy goals are currently met. Disease activity and control can be viewed as opposite.
These concepts have evolved over time for asthma in guidelines [23, 24], task forces [25] or consensus meetings
[26]. Up to 2006, asthma was classified by severity alone [22-25]. Then, newer GINA guidelines replaced «grading by severity» with «grading by control» using the same items. Neither classification seems adequate when employed in isolation, nor is the classification of asthma by control alone sufficient [26]. The NAEPP-EPR3 guidelines [23] made key suggestions combining impairment, response to treatment and risks. This concept was adopted by GINA
[27]. The uniform definition of severe asthma presented to WHO [28] used the NAEPP-EPR3 approach [23].
The aim of this paper is to generalize the approach of the uniform definition of severe asthma presented to WHO [28]
to allergic and related diseases in order to have a uniform definition of severity, control and risk usable in most situations. This uniform definition will allow to better define phenotypes of severe allergic (and related) diseases for clinical practice, research (including epidemiology), public health purposes, education and discovery of novel therapies (Table 1).
1. SEVERITY, CONTROL, RESPONSE TO TREATMENT AND RISK IN ASTHMA
The stratification/grading of asthma severity includes several components (Table 2). The most useful concept of asthma severity is based on the intensity of treatment required to obtain control [26].
1.1. Control
The level of asthma control incorporates current clinical control and exacerbations over the past 6 to 12 months [26]. The measurement of current asthma control may be assessed by individual outcome measures such as daily or nocturnal symptoms, symptoms linked to activities or exercise, monitoring of peak flow or pulmonary function, as needed use of relievers, and exacerbations. Used individually these measures cannot accurately assess asthma control. A composite measure reflecting all key endpoints is more relevant [29] and has been used in guidelines (22, 2008 #27059, 23) (Table 3).
Several scores for the control of asthma have been validated and translated in many languages in adults and adolescents. Examples are:
• The Royal College of Physicians three questions [32].
• The Juniper's Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) of Juniper based on 6 questions (ACQ6) and FEV1 (ACQ7) [33], but ACQ6 is more predictive than ACQ7 for asthma control [34].
• The Asthma Control Test (ACT) based on 5 questions [35, 36].
In children, a few asthma control questionnaires have been validated [37, 38].
None of these questionnaires assess appropriately exacerbations that are of importance in the assessment of control of asthma and deserve further attention.
Table 1. Goals of the current paper
• The current document develops a common strategy to the severity of chronic allergic (and related) diseases taken individually.
• It does not consider acute allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis.
• It does not take into account co-morbidities [29].
• It is intended to be used by all stakeholders involved
in the management or research of allergic (and related) diseases.
Table 2. Components contributing to asthma severity [23, 28]
1 Level of control • Current clinical control (impairment): Symptoms, health status and functional limitations over previous 2-4 weeks • Severe exacerbations over previous 6-12 months (use of oral or systemic corticosteroid)
2 Level of current treatment prescribed
3 Inhalation technique and compliance to treatment
4 Responsiveness to treatment
5 Exposure to aggravating factors
6 Risk
Biomarkers hold promise to capture complementary information, but need to be validated with regard to control. Biomarkers are either not readily available or completely unavailable in most practice settings [39].
Although asthma therapy is primarily aimed at controlling the disease, the control level of asthma is independent of the step of asthma treatment. Control can be achieved at any severity level. A patient under total control may still have severe disease (e. g. oral corticosteroid-treated patient). Patients achieving control with treatment have a lower risk of exacerbation than those who are uncontrolled [39].
Table 3. Level of asthma control in patients & 5 years of age [28] (Adapted from GINA 2006 [31] and 2007 NAEPP-EPR3 [23]) Any of the components places the patient in the category
Control level Well controlled** Partially controlled** Poorly controlled**
Daytime symptoms in the past 2-4 weeks ^ 2 days/week but not more than once a day > 2 days/week or more than once a day but ^ 2 days/week Throughout the day
Limitations of activities in the past 2-4 weeks None Some limitation Extremely limited
Nocturnal symptoms/awakenings in the past 2-4 weeks None ^ 2 nights/week > 2 nights/week
Need for short acting inhaled P2-agonists in the past 2-4 weeks ^ 2 days per week > 2 days per week Several times a day
Lung function FEVl or PEFR* FEV±/FVC (< 11 yrs of age) & 80% predicted or personal best & 80% 60-79% predicted or personal best 75-80% < 60% predicted or personal best < 75%
Exacerbation(s) (requiring oral or systemic corticosteroids)*** 0-1/yr 2/yr Frequent (> 2/yr)
Consider severity and interval since last exacerbation
* — FEV-l or PEF may be & 80% predicted in patients with severe persistent asthma; ** — For well controlled asthma, all components should be present; for partially or poorly controlled asthma, any of the components places the patient in the category; *** —At present, there are inadequate data to correspond frequencies of exacerbations with different levels of asthma control of severity.
nEflMATPMHECKAfl ^APMAKOflOrMfl /2011/ TOM 8/ № 4
Редакционная статья
1.2. Response to treatment
Responsiveness to treatment has been demonstrated in studies assessing risk reduction during treatment. Studies at the community level reveal a considerable reduction of hospitalizations and deaths using appropriate management [40]. Successful studies have been carried out in Low and Middle Income countries (LMICs) [41, 42] or deprived populations [43]. The concept is therefore applicable to all populations and all countries. In the NAEPP-EPR3 guidelines [22], resistance to therapy is defined as uncontrolled asthma despite high dose inhaled corticosteroid. For the INNOVATE trial (omalizumab), the European Medical Agency requested the assessment of asthma control in patients treated by inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting p-agonists [44].
1.3. Risk
The concept of asthma risk [23] is intended to capture:
• The likelihood of future asthma exacerbations.
• Progressive loss of pulmonary function over time (or for children, reduced lung growth).
• Risk of adverse effects from treatment, which should always be considered carefully.
These domains respond differentially to treatment. The assessment of risk domain is more difficult than the evaluation of control.
12
1.4. Definition of asthma severity and control
The definition of asthma severity, control and exacerbations proposed to WHO [28] took guidelines [23, 24] and the 2008 ATS/ERS Task Force report into consideration [26] (Figure 1). The recent consensus by U-BIOPRED from the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) distinguishes severe asthma from alternative diagnoses by providing a stepwise algorithm to single out severe refractory asthma from difficult asthma based on insufficient therapy, poor treatment adherence and/or co-morbidity [45].
In patients appropriately diagnosed, severe asthma is defined by the level of current clinical control and risks as: «Uncontrolled asthma which can result in risk of frequent severe exacerbations (or death) and/or adverse reactions to medications and/or chronic morbidity (including impaired lung function or reduced lung growth in children)» [28].
This proposal also includes wheezing disorders in preschool children although there is dispute as to the age at which the label «asthma» can properly be applied [46, 47]. A consensus was proposed [48], but the conclusions are still under discussion.
Figure. 1. Evaluation of asthma severity [23]
2. UNIFORM APPROACH TO THE SEVERITY OF CHRONIC
ALLERGIC (AND RELATED) DISEASES
Severe allergic (and related) diseases include 7 groups, each
carrying different public health messages and challenges
(Figure 2):
• Control should be monitored in all patients with a diagnosis of chronic allergic disease using available tests. Control should be regularly evaluated and treatment adapted to its level.
• Diagnosis is the first step, but it is not always easy as certain diseases may overlap (e.g. wheezing in preschool children).
• Responsiveness to treatment is the ease with which disease control is achieved by therapeutic interventions. For asthma or allergic rhinitis, effective treatments are available for most patients. Some diseases (e. g. some phenotypes of non-allergic rhinitis or urticaria) are more difficult to control.
• Availability and affordability of the treatment: The management of allergic disease depends on the context of national (or regional), economic and health provider settings and facilities, health system as well as individual and societal variables (beliefs, cultural and socio-economic determinants). In high-income countries, treatments are available and, for most patients, they are affordable. However, in many LMICs and in some deprived areas of high-income countries, essential medicines may be available but are rarely affordable [50]. Even if medications are affordable, health professional knowledge concerning their use is fragmented needing training, and health system often lacks infrastructure for early diagnosis, follow up, education as well as legislation for referral.
• Re-assessment of the diagnosis of the disease: In patients who are uncontrolled despite optimal treatment, all reasonable efforts to eliminate other diagnoses must be made. Patients may suffer from a mild disease that is considered to be severe because it is underlined by another disease (e. g. wheezing in cystic fibrosis). It may be difficult to ascribe the differential severity to the allergic disease or the underlying one. On the other hand, there may be a degree of overdiagnosis which could lead to a false impression of severe disease.
• Difficult-to-treat severe disease represents a category in which partial or poor response to treatment reflects factors other than the disease alone. Issues to address in such cases include:
• Poor adherence to treatment.
• Incorrect inhalation technique.
• Adverse environmental circumstances such as passive smoke or allergen exposure.
• Psychosocial issues.
• And co-morbidities which cannot be controlled.
Any or all of these factors can be very important in any
chronic disease.
• Patients with treatment-dependent severe disease
are those who require the highest level of recommended treatment to maintain control. This requirement for high doses of medication and multiple medications suggests a component of treatment resistance or insensitivity. Although the disease is controlled, the patients are at risk for exacerbations if treatment is inappropriately reduced or becomes unavailable.
• Patients with treatment-resistant severe disease are those who are partially or poorly controlled despite the highest recommended treatment provided according
to guidelines existing in the country (or if guidelines do not exist, the highest controller medications available in the country). This insensitivity may not an absolute phenomenon, but varies from patient to patient and with time.
• Severity should be re-assessed at regular intervals
as it may change over time.
3. SEVERE ALLERGIC AND RELATED DISEASES
3.1. Allergic and non-allergic rhinitis (and rhino-conjunctivitis)
Allergic rhinitis is an IgE-mediated reaction of the nasal mucosa. It is often associated with conjunctivitis (rhino-conjunctivitis) [11]. Non-allergic rhinitis represents a group of heterogeneous diseases in which no IgE-mediated reaction can be demonstrated [17]. Unmet clinical needs are clear in allergic and non-allergic rhinitis [51].
3.1.1. Control
Control and severity are not well delineated in rhinitis. Using the new definition, measures of the control of allergic rhinitis include symptom scores, Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) [52], objective measures of nasal obstruction such as peak inspiratory flow measurements, acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry [53], a recent modification of the ARIA severity classification [54] or patient's reported outcomes such as quality-of-life [11, 55, 56]. More recently, a score with several items was proposed [57]. It appears in rhinitis that a simple measure such as VAS may be sufficient to appreciate the control of the disease [58] and is particularly relevant to primary [59] or pharmacy care [60]. The level of control of allergic rhinitis is assessed independent of the treatment step [52, 61]. Vernal conjunctivitis is not considered in this document.
3.1.2. Responsiveness to treatment
Most patients with allergic rhinitis can be controlled using guideline-based treatment. However, among patients with moderate to severe symptoms who comply with an adequate treatment according to guidelines, up to 20% continue to be bothered by their symptoms. The GA2LEN-ARIA-WAO task force has proposed the new appellation of Severe Chronic Upper Airways Disease (SCUAD) for these cases where patients' symptoms are not sufficiently controlled despite their pharmacological treatment [51, 62]. However, SCUAD applies to all nasal diseases irrespective of the allergic component. Allergic conjunctivitis is frequently associated with pollen-induced rhinitis but it is more difficult to control than rhinitis [63].
The efficacy of treatment of non-allergic rhinitis is variable
[17]. It is heterogeneous in etiologies and inconsistently benefits from treatments which are effective in allergic rhinitis [64, 65].
3.1.3. Re-assessment of the diagnosis of the disease
Many different conditions can mimic allergic and non-allergic rhinitis [66]. Local allergic reactions with nasal but not systemic IgE antibodies [67] may be more important than initially thought. Misdiagnosis (e. g. nasal tumors, granulomas, cerebrospinal rhinorrhea) may lead to adverse outcomes if the patient is not appropriately re-assessed and reviewed.
3.1.4. Risk
Allergic rhinitis impairs work [68, 69] and school performance [70, 71]. Moreover, sedation in patients with allergic rhinitis may be increased by using HL-antihista-mines with sedative properties [72]. The major long-term risk of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis is the development of asthma [73].
nEflMATPMHECKAfl ^APMAKOflOrMfl /2011/ TOM 8/ № 4
Редакционная статья
3.2. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS)
3.2.1. Control
Control and severity are not well delineated in CRS. Using the new definition, it is proposed that an overall symptom score measured by VAS may more accurately monitor control, and could be combined with disease specific [18, 74] and generic health status assessment instruments [18].
3.2.2. Responsiveness to treatment
Responsiveness to treatment differs in CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) and CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) [75-77]. The principle of SCUAD also applies to CRS [51]. The pathophysiology of CRSsNP is poorly understood [19] and treatment options are limited to topical corticosteroids [18]. According to clinical experience and reports, sinus surgery improves symptoms in the short-term in 65-90% of the cases.
In CRSwNP, symptoms may be controlled by topical corticosteroid treatment in mild to moderate localized disease [78-80]. However, in severe polyposis and asthma co-morbidity, repeated courses of intranasal and/or oral corticosteroids are usually insufficient in controling symptoms. Repeated sinus surgeries may be needed with inconsistent clinical benefits [81].
3.2.3. Re-assessment of the diagnosis of the disease
The differential diagnosis includes all forms of rhinitis, as well as underlying sinus diseases such as cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, non-invasive fungal sinusitis, allergic fungal sinus disease and invasive forms
[18]. Sinus headache needs to be differentiated from neurological, ocular or facial pains. Other rare diagnoses are Wegener's, other granulomas disease, cocaine abuse or lymphomas. Any unilateral obstruction, pain and bleeding has to be investigated by a specialist to exclude malignancies, meningoceles and other serious conditions [82].
3.2.4. Risk
Very rarely, acute complications with a spread of the disease into the orbit, the meninges, the brain or frontal bone (osteomyelitis) may develop in the course of acute exacerbations of the disease. Mucoceles develop slowly as long-term complications after surgery, but also develop spontaneously.
About 10-15% of the CRSsNP and up to 45% of the CRSwNP patients will develop co-morbid asthma, which may be severe [83]. CRSwNP may also develop into a systemic disease such as aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease [84], or Churg-Strauss syndrome [85]. Allergic fungal sinus disease may be accompanied by allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA).
Repeated courses of oral corticosteroids in patients with persistent CRS may affect bone metabolism and lead to HPA-axis dysfunction [79, 86].
3.3. Chronic urticaria
Urticaria describes the spontaneous or inducible occurrence of wheals and flares often accompanied by pruritus which generally subside within hours, while new lesions occur. Chronic urticaria is a group of spontaneous or inducible diseases characterized by symptom persistence or reoccurrence over 6 weeks [21, 87] with several clinical unmet needs [88]. Angioedema describes a deep swelling in the dermis which can be accompanied by pain and predominantly involves soft tissues, e.g. in the face (eyelids, lips) or genital area.
3.3.1. Control
Control and severity are not well delineated in chronic urticaria [88]. Using the new definition, control can be assessed by daily number of wheals and intensity of pruritus as assessed using the weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7) [89] and/or the chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire (CU-Q2oL) [90, 91]. Patient diaries and health-related quality of life instruments can be used.
3.3.2. Responsiveness to treatment
In chronic urticaria, symptomatic treatment is the rule since causal treatment is rarely effective [22, 88]. Chronic urticaria can be fully controlled in a minority of patients by following the guideline-recommended step-up approach. The aim of treatment in chronic urticaria is the absence of symptoms,
i. e. the complete protection from the reoccurrence of wheals, pruritus, and angioedema. This can be achieved in less than half of all patients by using licensed doses of non-sedating oral Hl-antihistamines, the guideline-recommended first step therapy and only in-label treatment option [92].
3.3.3. Re-assessment of the diagnosis of the disease
Urticaria vasculitis and auto-inflammatory disorders (e. g. cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS) [93], Schnitzler syndrome [94], mastocytosis [95]) and hereditary or other complement associated disease [8] must be considered in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria who present with wheals and signs of systemic inflammation or recurrent angioedema without wheals. These diseases are associated with a high risk of severe morbidity and mortality.
3.3.4. Risk
The risks in chronic inducible urticaria are different from those in chronic spontaneous urticaria and specific for each inducible urticaria. In general, low thresholds for trigger intensity and for trigger exposure time are indicators of high disease activity [96].
Some inducible urticarias such as cold urticaria and exercise-induced urticaria can induce severe systemic reactions including anaphylactic shock which may lead to death (e. g. swimming in cold water).
Chronic spontaneous urticaria patients are at risk of developing comorbidities such as autoimmune disorders (e. g. autoimmune thyroiditis) [97].
Since many patients cannot be controlled using recommended doses of medications, uncontrolled patients often develop depression and anxiety [98].
Many chronic urticaria patients are at risk of experiencing adverse effects of their therapy since they often receive doses higher than those recommended as well as the off-label use of other medications.
3.4. Atopic dermatitis
3.4.1. Control
Several severity tests of current atopic dermatitis (AD) have been published. Three measurements (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis [SCORAD] [99], Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] [100], and Patient-oriented Eczema Measure [POEM]) have been tested sufficiently and performed adequately [101]. Other scoring systems such as the Langeland-Rajka score have been designed to include information about the recent past (3 months) of the disease [102]. Besides the objective parameters such as erythema or excoriations, the more subjective aspect of pruritus/itching is of great importance in the evaluation of the disease since it also reflects the severity. SCORAD also includes a VAS component for this particular
symptom. Furthermore, SCORAD has been used to classify AD into 3 main severity forms: mild (< 15), moderate (> 15 and < 40) and severe (> 40). Recently, a patient-oriented version of SCORAD (PO-SCORAD) was proposed and validated, allowing the estimation of severity by the patients themselves or the caregivers of affected children [103]. These scoring systems only provide a snapshot of the current disease situation for a given patient at a defined time point [104] and should be more appropriately considered as control tests.
Impaired QOL is common in AD, both in children (patients and caregivers) and adults. Impaired QOL may be observed in infants [105]. Several QOL measures (disease-specific and generic) have been used [106].
3.4.2. Responsiveness to treatment
Most cases of patients seemingly resistant to the treatment are certainly explained by a lack of correct implementation of the guidelines [107, 108]. This can be improved by an intense treatment under supervision and adapted educational programs. Thus, as in other chronic diseases, the responsiveness and control of the disease is tightly dependent on the compliance of the patients/parents. However, truly therapy-resistant AD severe cases exist, which may be explained by a particular genetic predisposition. There are currently no studies available having addressed this issue, but it is estimated that no more than 5% of AD belong to this group [13].
3.4.3. Re-assessment of the diagnosis of the disease
Depending on the age of onset, AD can be misdiagnosed [107, 108]. In preschool children, the spectrum of differential diagnosis is very wide including either common diseases such as psoriasis or rather rare conditions such as Schwachman Diamond's syndrome (also named Burke-Syndrome) agammaglobulinaemia, ataxia telangiectasia [109] and histiocytic disorders [110]. In adults, other diseases such as seborrheic dermatitis or cutaneous T cell lymphoma have to be excluded [111].
3.4.4. Risk
Atopic dermatitis during infancy is a risk factor for other atopic diseases occurring later in childhood [112-114]. This is probably the case for about 30% of AD patients, mostly with early onset, i.e. in infancy. During the first year of life, atopic dermatitis is mostly related to food allergy, but very often spontaneously improves after one to two years. Children with early onset, a filagrin mutation and having food allergy (mainly peanut) have almost a 100% risk of developing allergic asthma [115].
On the other hand, about 30% of adult patients seem to develop specific IgE against self-proteins, suggesting an autoimmune form of AD in adulthood for which allergen avoidance is therefore meaningless [116].
Due to a strongly impaired innate immunity response of the epidermal barrier in AD, these patients have a high risk of developing superinfections with bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, fungi such as Malassezia sympo-dialis or herpes simplex virus or causing eczema herpeticum, a severe complication of AD [117, 118].
The increased permeability of the skin associated with chronic inflammation may also favor sensitization to haptens, causing increasing rates of allergic contact dermatitis [119].
4. APPLICATION TO CHILDREN
4.1 Severe problematic asthma
Severe problematic asthma is probably as common in children as in adults, with approximately 4-5% of children
with asthma [120]. Phenotypes of severe problematic asthma differ in children and in adults [121, 122]. A proposal with a 4-step procedure for the diagnosis and assessment of severe problematic asthma in childhood has recently been published [123]. The steps include (a) a full diagnostic work-up that may exclude other chronic lung diseases which may mimic severe asthma; (b) a multidisciplinary assessment to identify factors of importance including co-morbidities; (c) an assessment of the pattern of inflammation and (d) a documentation of the level of corticosteroid responsiveness.
4.2 Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and chronic rhinosinusitis
For children, there is an increasing awareness that rhinitis may start in very early childhood, but definitions and control measures are largely lacking. Treatment challenges are frequently more pronounced in children, with sparse documentation of pharmacological intervention in severe disease, which is often part of complex atopic disease presentation.
It is difficult to diagnose allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis in preschool children. Furthermore, children of this age have frequent infections of the upper airways, and management is challenging due to a lack of guidelines, co-morbidities and a lack of objective parameters to guide diagnosis.
There are specific problems in childhood/adolescence such as general symptoms of malaise occurring during important school and university examinations in the spring pollen season [124].
In children, it may be difficult to distinguish between persistent non-allergic rhinitis and rhinitis associated with recurrent respiratory tract infections.
Cystic fibrosis or primary ciliary dyskinesias are important to rule out in patients suspected of chronic rhinosinusitis.
5. IMPORTANCE OF A UNIFORM APPROACH
5.1. Subphenotyping severe/uncontrolled diseases
Allergic diseases represent complex multi-dimensional diseases with marked heterogeneity depending on environmental factors and socio-economic determinants. Tools to phenotype individual disease subtypes are now being developed in order to characterize the various patterns of triggers that induce symptoms, different clinical presentations of the disease, and different inflammatory markers. This is the case for asthma (US SARP: Severe Asthma Research Program [125, 126], U-BIOPRED [45, 127] and allergic disease onset (MeDALL, Mechanisms of the Development of ALLergy, FP7 [49]) but more research is needed to identify allergic disease subphenotypes or endophenotypes [128] based on severity.
Phenotyping subtypes can be used to characterize and predict disease severity, progression, and response to treatment, and may help identify unique targets for treatment [26]. Heterogeneity also exists within each dimension of the disease (e.g. eosinophils and asthma severity) [129, 130], across diseases (e.g. eosinophils in asthma and COPD) and in relation to co-morbidities [131, 132]. Phenotypes may also change over time.
Phenotype heterogeneity may reflect a priori defined hypotheses or lead to the generation of novel hypotheses through multiple logistic regression [131, 133], cluster analysis [126, 132] or free scale networks. However, a uniform definition applied worldwide is needed, and then detailed subphenotyping of severe allergic diseases may be approached [28].
5.2. Clinical practice
A uniform definition provides a framework to decide who needs targeting for treatment or improved treatment [28].
nEflMATPMHECKAfl ^APMAKOflOrMfl /2011/ TOM 8/ № 4
Редакционная статья
It will help in the delivery of appropriate health care through better organization for diagnosis and treatment in primary care and/or specialist clinics. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended in patients with severe allergic diseases [39]. For this, the use of a common language across primary, secondary and tertiary care is important. A major challenge is that their functional differentiation of level of care turns into a segregation of patient flows. The use in guidelines of the same definitions and criteria across the board of health care will facilitate a smooth transfer of patients from primary care to more specialized care and back, according to their needs. Communication with patients or parents of patients should be focused on providing information on the need for therapy and consequent use of therapy, as well as on the risks of not complying with these recommendations.
5.3. Personalized medicine
The main challenge for allergic diseases in the 21st century is to understand their complexity. Identification of the underlying mechanisms will help the prognosis, diagnosis and treatment of disease [49] as well as the transition to predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory (P4) medicine [134]. The uniform approach of severity is perfectly embedded within this new paradigm.
16
5.4. Registries for severe allergic (and related) diseases
Severe asthma registries provide a foundation upon which to generate a greater understanding of public health need, define phenotypic heterogeneity to inform the design of research studies and to improve overall clinical care [28]. Registries will help for the surveillance of severe allergic diseases. Data from the registries may provide evidence of inadequacies in control of diseases. The establishment of an internationally-agreed definition of severe allergic (and related) diseases will provide the opportunity to develop a single registry in order to capture core information in both developed and developing countries. This is particularly relevant to the worldwide changing demography of allergic diseases.
5.5. Clinical trials
For clinical trials, it is essential to have clarity as to what definitions have been used — severity assessed before treatment or after treatment, and in this case, which treatment was used. In addition, clinical trials should consider co-morbidities and confounding conditions necessary for adequate assessment of clinical responses (e. g. smoking and asthma) or effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches.
5.6. Registration of medicines and reimbursement
Controlled trials designed with a uniform approach of severity [135] will be more easily evaluated by the agencies for approval and by the Health Technology Assessment agencies (such as NICE) for reimbursement.
5.7. Research on mechanisms and genetics
More research into severe allergic diseases is urgently needed. Many large collaborative studies are already ongoing for severe asthma [125-127], but not for the other diseases. A uniform definition and a collaborative approach to epidemiological, genetic and mechanistic research are important. Different levels of phenotype characterization (granularity) can be applied to assess
phenotypic characterization in patients with severe allergic (and related) diseases. For the success of such approaches it is important to develop global partnerships and platforms to ensure the application of standard methodology and protocols to promote the collection and sharing of samples and data through appropriate infrastructure in different countries [28].
5.8. Epidemiology
In epidemiologic population studies, standardized definitions are fundamental. It is often difficult to assess severity since many patients are undertreated. The uniform definition of severe allergic (and related) diseases accounts for these patients and articulates time frames for appropriate assessment of severity and control. Thus, the definition will facilitate epidemiological research, understand modifiable risk factors and comparisons across studies in different populations. Control usually refers to events occurring recently (over the last 2-4 weeks) whereas severity refers to those occurring over a long period of time (e. g. 6-12 months).
5.9. Public health planning
For public health purposes, a uniform definition of severe allergic (and related) diseases is needed to identify the prevalence, burden and costs incurred by severe patients in order to improve quality of care and optimize health care planning and policies. This definition will provide support for more precise calculations on the needs and costs for medications in a country.
5.10. Developed and developing countries
A uniform definition of severe allergic (and related) diseases should be applicable to local and geographical conditions of all countries, phenotypes, risk factors, availability and affordability to treatment differing widely around the world. Research must be planned to evaluate the phenotypes of «severe» allergic (and related) diseases from different countries.
5.11. Development of novel therapies
For treatment-resistant severe allergic (and related) diseases, more detailed cellular and molecular phenotyping is needed to identify new targets for the development of novel therapies and to improve current therapies in a cost-effective manner. Ultimately, novel therapies studied in clinical trials should help define the pathogenesis of the diseases and determine the importance of the treatment in large patient populations or in subpopulation of patients based on the concept of distinct phenotypes and endotypes.
CONCLUSIONS
It is likely that a uniform definition of severe allergic diseases will help in a better understanding of phenotypes but there is a need for a validation process of the proposed definition for severe chronic allergic diseases across different populations and countries with different income, age groups and different disease phenotypes.
Acknowledgment: This paper is part of MeDALL WP2 and was completed during a meeting in CREAL, Barcelona (June 29-30, 2011), and the French Speaking Respiratory Forum (Espace Francophone de Pneumologie, Societe de Pneumologie de Langue Francaise, Nice, July 8-10, 2011) in collaboration with the WHO Collaborating Center for Asthma and Rhinitis (Montpellier).
1. Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, Friedmann PS, Lanier BQ, Lockey RF, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 May; 113 (5): 832-6.
2. Bousquet J, Anto JM, Bachert C, Bousquet PJ, Colombo P Crameri R, et al. Factors responsible for differences between asymptomatic subjects and patients presenting an IgE sensitization to allergens. A GALEN project. Allergy. 2006 Jun; 61 (6): 671-80.
3. Svanes C, Sunyer J, Plana E, Dharmage S, Heinrich J, Jarvis D, et al. Early life origins of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2010 Jan; 65 (1): 14-20.
4. Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF, Jr., Bock SA, Branum A, et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report — Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Feb;
117 (2): 391-7.
5. Demoly P Pichler W, Pirmohamed M, Romano A. Important questions in Allergy: 1 — drug allergy/hypersensitivity. Allergy. 2008 May; 63 (5): 616-9.
6. Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb; 125 (2 Suppl 2): S116-25.
7. Bilo BM, Rueff F, Mosbech H, Bonifazi F, Oude-Elberink JN. Diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergy. 2005 Nov; 60 (11): 1339-49.
8. Zuraw BL. Clinical practice. Hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4; 359 (10): 1027-36.
9. Krause K, Zuberbier T, Maurer M. Modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of cold contact urticaria. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2010 Jul; 10 (4): 243-9.
10. Roujeau JC. Clinical heterogeneity of drug hypersensitivity. Toxicology. 2005 Apr 15; 209 (2): 123-9.
11. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A, et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA)
2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen). Allergy. 2008 Apr; 63 Suppl 86: 8-160.
12. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N. Global surveillance, prevention and control of Chronic Respiratory Diseases. A comprehensive approach. Global Alliance against Chronic Respiratory Diseases. World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 156346 8. 2007: 148 pages.
13. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. N Engl J med. 2008; 358 (14): 1483-94.
14. Pearce N, Pekkanen J, Beasley R. How much asthma is really attributable to atopy? Thorax. 1999 Mar; 54 (3): 268-72.
15. Weinmayr G, Forastiere F, Weiland SK, Rzehak P, Abramidze T, Annesi-Maesano I, et al. International variation in prevalence of rhinitis and its relationship with sensitisation to perennial and seasonal allergens. Eur Respir J. 2008 Nov; 32 (5): 1250-61.
16. Bousquet PJ, Leynaert B, Neukirch F, Sunyer J, Janson CM, Anto J, et al. Geographical distribution of atopic rhinitis in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey I. Allergy. 2008 Oct; 63 (10): 1301-9.
17. Bousquet J, Fokkens W, Burney P Durham SR, Bachert C, Akdis CA, et al. Important research questions in allergy and related diseases: nonallergic rhinitis: a GA2LEN paper. Allergy. 2008 Jul; 63 (7): 842-53.
18. Fokkens W, Lund V, Mullol J. EP3OS. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. 2007. Rhinology. 2007; 45 (Suppl 20): 1-139.
19. Bachert C, Van Bruaene N, Toskala E, Zhang N, Olze H, Scadding G, et al. Important research questions in allergy and related diseases: 3-chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis — a GALEN study. Allergy. 2009 Apr; 64 (4): 520-33.
20. Hastan D, Fokkens WJ, Bachert C, Newson RB, Bislimovska J, Bockelbrink A, et al. Chronic rhinosinusitis in Europe — an underestimated disease. A GA(2)LEN study. Allergy. 2011 May 24.
21. Zuberbier T, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Walter Canonica G, Church MK, Gimenez-Arnau A, et al. EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: definition, classification and diagnosis of urticaria. Allergy.
2009 Oct; 64 (10): 1417-26.
22. Zuberbier T, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Walter Canonica G, Church MK, Gimenez-Arnau AM, et al. EAACI/GA (2)LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: management of urticaria. Allergy. 2009 Oct; 64 (10): 1427-43.
23. Expert panel report 3: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. US Department of Health and Human Services. 440 pages. 2007.
24. Bousquet J, Clark TJ, Hurd S, Khaltaev N, Lenfant C, O'Byrne P et al. GINA guidelines on asthma and beyond. Allergy. 2007 Feb; 62 (2): 102-12.
25. Proceedings of the ATS workshop on refractory asthma: current understanding, recommendations, and unanswered questions. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Dec; 162 (6):2341-51.
26. Taylor DR, Bateman ED, Boulet LP Boushey HA, Busse WW, Casale TB, et al. A new perspective on concepts of asthma severity and control. Eur Respir J. 2008 Sep; 32 (3): 545-54.
27. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention (GINA), 2010 update. http://wwwginasthmaorg/pdf/GINA_ Report_2010pdf. 2010.
28. Bousquet J, Mantzouranis E, Cruz AA, Ait-Khaled N, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bleecker ER, et al. Uniform definition of asthma severity, control, and exacerbations: document presented for the World Health Organization Consultation on Severe Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Nov; 126 (5): 926-38.
29. Bousquet J, Anto JM, Sterk PJ, Adcock IM, Chung KF, Roca J, et al. Systems medicine and integrated care to combat chronic noncommunicable diseases. Genome Med. 2011 Jul 6; 3 (7): 43.
30. Humbert M, Holgate S, Boulet LP, Bousquet J. Asthma control or severity: that is the question. Allergy. 2007 Feb; 62 (2): 95-101.
31. Bateman ED, Hurd SS, Barnes PJ, Bousquet J, Drazen JM, Fitzgerald M, et al. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J. 2008 Jan; 31 (1): 143-78.
32. Thomas M, Gruffydd-Jones K, Stonham C, Ward S, Macfa-rlane TV. Assessing asthma control in routine clinical practice: use of the Royal College of Physicians '3 Questions'. Prim Care Respir J.
2008 Aug 12.
33. Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J. 1999; 14 (4): 902-7.
34. Juniper EF, Bousquet J, Abetz L, Bateman ED. Identifying 'well-controlled' and 'not well-controlled' asthma using the Asthma Control Questionnaire. Respir Med. 2006 Apr; 100 (4): 616-21.
35. Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jan; 113 (1): 59-65.
36. Thomas M, Kay S, Pike J, Williams A, Rosenzweig JR, Hillyer EV, et al. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) as a predictor of GINA guideline-defined asthma control: analysis of a multinational cross-sectional survey. Prim Care Respir J. 2009 Mar; 18 (1): 41-9.
37. Juniper EF, Gruffydd-Jones K, Ward S, Svensson K. Asthma Control Questionnaire in children: validation, measurement properties, interpretation. Eur Respir J. 2010 Dec; 36 (6): 1410-6.
38. Liu AH, Zeiger RS, Sorkness CA, Ostrom NK, Chipps BE, Rosa K, et al. The Childhood Asthma Control Test: retrospective determination and clinical validation of a cut point to identify children with very poorly controlled asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Aug; 126 (2): 267-73, 73 el.
39. British Guideline on the Management of Asthma. Thorax.
2008 May;63 Suppl 4: ivl-121.
40. Haahtela T, Tuomisto LE, Pietinalho A, Klaukka T, Erhola M, Kaila M, et al. A 10 year asthma programme in Finland: major change for the better. Thorax. 2006 Aug; 61 (8): 663-70.
41. Souza-Machado C, Souza-Machado A, Franco R, Ponte EV, Barreto ML, Rodrigues LC, et al. Rapid reduction in hospitalisations after an intervention to manage severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2010 Mar; 35 (3): 515-21.
42. Andrade WC, Camargos P, Lasmar L, Bousquet J. A pediatric asthma management program in a low-income setting resulting in reduced use of health service for acute asthma. Allergy.
2010 Jun 14.
43. Evans R, 3rd, Gergen PJ, Mitchell H, Kattan M, Kercsmar C, Crain E, et al. A randomized clinical trial to reduce asthma morbidity among inner-city children: results of the National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study. J Pediatr. 1999 Sep; 135 (3): 332-8.
44. Humbert M, Beasley R, Ayres J, Slavin R, Hebert J, Bousquet J, et al. Benefits of omalizumab as add-on therapy in patients with severe persistent asthma who are inadequately controlled despite best available therapy (GINA 2002 step 4 treatment): INNOVATE. Allergy.
2005 Mar; 60 (3): 309-16.
45. Bell E, Sousa A, Fleming L, Bush A, Chung K, Versnel I, et al. Diagnosis and definition of severe refractory asthma: an international consensus statement from the Innovative Medicines Initative (IMI). Thorax. 2011 (in press).
nEflMATPMHECKAfl ^APMAKOflOrMfl /2011/ TOM 8/ № 4
Редакционная статья
46. Castro-Rodriguez JA, Holberg CJ, Wright AL, Martinez FD. A clinical index to define risk of asthma in young children with recurrent wheezing [In Process Citation]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 162 (4 Pt 1): 1403-6.
47. Devulapalli CS, Carlsen KC, Haland G, Munthe-Kaas MC, Pettersen M, Mowinckel P, et al. Severity of obstructive airways disease by age 2 years predicts asthma at 10 years of age. Thorax.
2008 Jan; 63 (1): 8-13.
48. Brand PL, Baraldi E, Bisgaard H, Boner AL, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Custovic A, et al. Definition, assessment and treatment of wheezing disorders in preschool children: an evidence-based approach. Eur Respir J. 2008 Oct; 32 (4): 1096-110.
49. Bousquet J, Anto J, Auffray C, Akdis M, Cambon-Thomsen A, Keil T, et al. MeDALL (Mechanisms of the Development of ALLergy): an integrated approach from phenotypes to systems medicine. Allergy. 2011 May; 66 (5): 596-604.
50. Cameron A, Ewen M, Ross-Degnan D, Ball D, Laing R. Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis. Lancet. 2009 Jan 17; 373 (9659): 240-9.
51. Bousquet J, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Casale TB, Cruz AA, Lockey RJ, et al. Unmet needs in severe chronic upper airway disease (SCUAD). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Sep; 124 (3): 428-33.
52. Bousquet PJ, Combescure C, Neukirch F, Klossek JM, Mechin H, Daures JP et al. Visual analog scales can assess the severity of rhinitis graded according to ARIA guidelines. Allergy. 2007 Apr; 62 (4): 367-72.
53. Ragab SM, Lund VJ, Saleh HA, Scadding G. Nasal nitric oxide in objective evaluation of chronic rhinosinusitis therapy. Allergy. 2006 Jun; 61 (6): 717-24.
54. Valero A, Ferrer M, Sastre J, Navarro AM, Monclus L, Marti-Guadano E, et al. A new criterion by which to discriminate between patients with moderate allergic rhinitis and patients with severe allergic rhinitis based on the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma severity items. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Aug; 120 (2): 359-65.
55. Baiardini I, Bousquet PJ, Brzoza Z, Canonica GW, Compalati E, Fiocchi A, et al. Recommendations for assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related quality of life in clinical trials on allergy: a GA(2)LEN taskforce position paper. Allergy.
2009 Nov 20.
56. Baiardini I, Bousquet PJ, Brzoza Z, Canonica GW, Compalati E, Fiocchi A, et al. Recommendations for assessing patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life in clinical trials on allergy: a GA (2)LEN taskforce position paper. Allergy. 2010 Mar;
65 (3): 290-5.
57. Schatz M, Meltzer EO, Nathan R, Derebery MJ, Mintz M, Stanford RH, et al. Psychometric validation of the rhinitis control assessment test: a brief patient-completed instrument for evaluating rhinitis symptom control. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010 Feb; 104 (2): 118-24.
58. Bousquet PJ, Combescure C, Klossek JM, Daures JP Bousquet J. Change in visual analog scale score in a pragmatic randomized cluster trial of allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
2009 Jun; 123 (6): 1349-54.
59. Ryan D, van Weel C, Bousquet J, Toskala E, Ahlstedt S, Palkonen S, et al. Primary care: the cornerstone of diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Allergy. 2008 Aug; 63 (8): 981-9.
60. ARIA in the pharmacy: management of allergic rhinitis symptoms in the pharmacy. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma. Allergy. 2004 Apr; 59 (4): 373-87.
61. Bousquet J, Annesi-Maesano I, Carat F, Leger D, Rugina M, Pribil C, et al. Characteristics of intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis: DREAMS study group. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Jun; 35 (6): 728-32.
62. Bousquet PJ, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Casale TB, Mullol J, Klossek JM, et al. Uncontrolled allergic rhinitis during treatment and its impact on quality of life: a cluster randomized trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 20l0 Sep; 126 (3): 666-8 el-5.
63. Bousquet J, Lund VJ, Van Cauwenberge P, Bremard-Oury C, Mounedji N, Stevens MT, et al. Implementation of guidelines for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled trial. Allergy. 2003 Aug; 58 (8): 733-41.
64. Webb DR, Meltzer EO, Finn AF, Jr., Rickard KA, Pepsin PJ, Westlund R, et al. Intranasal fluticasone propionate is effective for perennial nonallergic rhinitis with or without eosinophilia. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Apr; 88 (4): 385-90.
65. Greiner AN, Meltzer EO. Pharmacologic rationale for treating allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Nov;
118 (5): 985-98.
66. Bousquet J, Van Cauwenberge P Khaltaev N. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 108 (5 Suppl): S147-334.
67. Rondon C, Romero JJ, Lopez S, Antunez C, Martin-Casanez E, Torres MJ, et al. Local IgE production and positive nasal provocation test in patients with persistent nonallergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr; 119 (4): 899-905.
68. Dykewicz MS, Fineman S. Executive Summary of Joint Task Force Practice Parameters on Diagnosis and Management of Rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998; 81 (5 Pt 2):463-8.
69. Bousquet J, Neukirch F, Bousquet PJ, Gehano P Klossek JM, Le Gal M, et al. Severity and impairment of allergic rhinitis in patients consulting in primary care. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jan; 117 (1): 158-62.
70. Blaiss MS. Allergic rhinitis and impairment issues in schoolchildren: a consensus report. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Dec; 20 (12): 1937-52.
71. Simons FE. Learning impairment and allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 1996; 17 (4): 185-9.
72. Church MK, Maurer M, Simons FE, Bindslev-Jensen C, van Cauwenberge P, Bousquet J, et al. Risk of first-generation H (l)-antihistamines: a GA (2)LEN position paper. Allergy. 2010 Apr;
65 (4): 459-66.
73. Shaaban R, Zureik M, Soussan D, Neukirch C, Heinrich J, Sunyer J, et al. Rhinitis and onset of asthma: a longitudinal population-based study. Lancet. 2008 Sep 20; 372 (9643): 1049-57.
74. Lim M, Lew-Gor S, Darby Y, Brookes N, Scadding G, Lund VJ. The relationship between subjective assessment instruments in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2007 Jun; 45 (2): 144-7.
75. Van Zele T, Claeys S, Gevaert P Van Maele G, Holtappels G, Van Cauwenberge P, et al. Differentiation of chronic sinus diseases by measurement of inflammatory mediators. Allergy. 2006 Nov; 61 (11): 1280-9.
76. Zhang N, Van Zele T, Perez-Novo C, Van Bruaene N, Holtappels G, Deruyck N, et al. Different types of T-effector cells orchestrate mucosal inflammation in chronic sinus disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Sep 17.
77. Van Bruaene N, Derycke L, Perez-Novo CA, Gevaert P, Holtappels G, De Ruyck N, et al. TGF-beta signaling and collagen deposition in chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug; 124 (2): 253-9, 9 el-2.
78. Stjarne P, Blomgren K, Caye-Thomasen P Salo S, Soderstrom T. The efficacy and safety of once-daily mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 Jun; 126 (6): 606-12.
79. Mullol J, Obando A, Pujols L, Alobid I. Corticosteroid treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis: the possibilities and the limits. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2009 Nov; 29 (4): 657-68.
80. Vaidyanathan S, Barnes M, Williamson P Hopkinson P, Donnan PT, Lipworth B. Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis with oral steroids followed by topical steroids: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 1; 154 (5): 293-302.
81. Vento SI, Ertama LO, Hytonen ML, Wolff CH, Malmberg CH. Nasal polyposis: clinical course during 20 years. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000 Sep; 85 (3): 209-14.
82. Alobid I, Guilemany JM, Mullol J. Nasal manifestations of systemic illnesses. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2004 May; 4 (3): 208-16.
83. Bachert C, Zhang N, Holtappels G, De Lobel L, van Cauwenberge P Liu S, et al. Presence of IL-5 protein and IgE antibodies to staphylococcal enterotoxins in nasal polyps is associated with comorbid asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Nov; 126 (5): 962-8, 8 e1-6.
84. Kowalski ML, Makowska JS, Blanca M, Bavbek S, Bochenek G, Bousquet J, et al. Hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) — classification, diagnosis and management: review of the EAACI/ENDA (#) and GA2LEN/HANNA*. Allergy. 2011 Jul;
66 (7): 818-29.
85. Fuchs HA, Tanner SB. Granulomatous disorders of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2009 Feb; 17 (1): 23-7.
86. Bonfils P, Halimi P, Malinvaud D. Adrenal suppression and osteoporosis after treatment of nasal polyposis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 Dec; 126 (11): 1195-200.
87. Kaplan AP Greaves M. Pathogenesis of chronic urticaria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Jun; 39 (6): 777-87.
88. Maurer M, Weller K, Bindslev-Jensen C, Gimenez-Arnau A, Bousquet P, Bousquet J, et al. Unmet clinical needs in chronic spontaneous urticaria. A GA(2)LEN task force report (1). Allergy.
2010 Nov 17.
89. Mathias SD, Dreskin SC, Kaplan A, Saini SS, Spector S, Rosen KE. Development of a daily diary for patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010 Aug; 105 (2): 142-8.
90. Mlynek A, Zalewska-Janowska A, Martus P, Staubach P, Zuberbier T, Maurer M. How to assess disease activity in patients with chronic urticaria? Allergy. 2008 Jun; 63 (6): 777-80.
91. Baiardini I, Braido F, Brandi S, Canonica GW. Allergic diseases and their impact on quality of life. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol.
2006 Oct; 97 (4): 419-28; quiz 29-30, 76.
92. Kropfl L, Maurer M, Zuberbier T. Treatment strategies in urticaria. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Jun; 11 (9): 1445-50.
93. Neven B, Prieur AM, Quartier dit Maire P Cryopyrinopathies: update on pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol.
2008 Sep; 4 (9): 481-9.
94. Soubrier M. Schnitzler syndrome. Joint Bone Spine. 2008 May; 75 (3): 263-6.
95. Valent P, Arock M, Bischoff SC, Buhring HJ, Brockow K, Escribano L, et al. The European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM). Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Oct 30; 116 (19-20): 647-51.
96. Magerl M, Borzova E, Gimenez-Arnau A, Grattan CE, Lawlor F, Mathelier-Fusade P, et al. The definition and diagnostic testing of physical and cholinergic urticarias — EAACI/gA^LEN/EDF/UNEV consensus panel recommendations. Allergy. 2009 Dec; 64 (12): 1715-21.
97. Dreskin SC, Andrews KY. The thyroid and urticaria. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Oct; 5 (5): 408-12.
98. Willemsen R, Roseeuw D, Vanderlinden J. Alexithymia and dermatology: the state of the art. Int J Dermatol. 2008 Sep; 47 (9): 903-10.
99. Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index. Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology. 1993; 186 (1): 23-31.
100. Hanifin JM, Thurston M, Omoto M, Cherill R, Tofte SJ, Graeber M. The eczema area and severity index (EASI): assessment of reliability in atopic dermatitis. EASI Evaluator Group. Exp Dermatol. 2001 Feb; 10 (1): 11-8.
101. Schmitt J, Langan S, Williams HC. What are the best outcome measurements for atopic eczema? A systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Dec; 120 (6): 1389-98.
102. Rajka G, Langeland T. Grading of the severity of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1989; 144: 13-4.
103. Stalder JF, Barbarot S, Wollenberg A, Holm EA, De Raeve L, Seidenari S, et al. Patient-Oriented SCORAD (PO-SCORAD): a new self-assessment scale in atopic dermatitis validated in Europe. Allergy. 2011 Mar 18.
104. van Velsen SG, Knol MJ, Haeck IM, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Pasmans SG. The Self-administered Eczema Area and Severity Index in children with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: better estimation of AD body surface area than severity. Pediatr Dermatol.
2010 Sep-Oct; 27 (5): 470-5.
105. Alanne S, Nermes M, Soderlund R, Laitinen K. Quality of life in infants with atopic dermatitis and healthy infants: a follow-up from birth to 24 months. Acta Paediatr. 2011 Feb 22.
106. Rehal B, Armstrong A. Health Outcome Measures in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review of Trends in Disease Severity and Quality-of-Life Instruments 1985-2010. PLoS One. 2011; 6 (4): e17520.
107. Saeki H, Furue M, Furukawa F, Hide M, Ohtsuki M, Katayama I, et al. Guidelines for management of atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol.
2009 Oct; 36 (10): 563-77.
108. Darsow U, Wollenberg A, Simon D, Taieb A, Werfel T, Oranje A, et al. ETFAD/EADV eczema task force 2009 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Mar; 24 (3): 317-28.
109. Bos JD. Atopiform dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2002 Sep; 147 (3): 426-9.
110. Filipovich A, McClain K, Grom A. Histiocytic disorders: recent insights into pathophysiology and practical guidelines. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Jan; 16 (1 Suppl): S82-9.
111. Clark rA, Fuhlbrigge RC. Immunology and skin disease 2009: frontiers in cutaneous immunology. J Invest Dermatol. 2009 Aug; 129 (8): 1849-51.
112. Leung DY. Preface to atopic dermatitis intervention to control the atopic march. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Dec;
112 (6 Suppl): S117.
113. Illi S, von Mutius E, Lau S, Nickel R, Gruber C, Niggemann B, et al. The natural course of atopic dermatitis from birth to age 7 years
and the association with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 May;
113 (5): 925-31.
114. Spergel JM. Epidemiology of Atopic Dermatitis and Atopic March in Children. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2010 Aug; 30 (3): 269-80.
115. Brown SJ, Asai Y, Cordell HJ, Campbell LE, Zhao Y, Liao H, et al. Loss-of-function variants in the filaggrin gene are a significant risk factor for peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar; 127 (3): 661-7.
116. von Bubnoff D, Andres E, Hentges F, Bieber T, Michel T, Zimmer J. Natural killer cells in atopic and autoimmune diseases of the skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Jan; 125 (1): 60-8.
117. Ong PY, Leung DY. The infectious aspects of atopic dermatitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2010 Aug; 30 (3): 309-21.
118. Shiohara T, Sato Y, Takahashi R, Kurata M, Mizukawa Y. Increased susceptibility to cutaneous viral infections in atopic dermatitis: the roles of regulatory T cells and innate immune defects. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2011; 41: 125-35.
119. Fonacier LS, Aquino MR. The role of contact allergy in atopic dermatitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2010 Aug; 30 (3): 337-50.
120. Lang A, Carlsen KH, Haaland G, Devulapalli CS, Munthe-Kaas M, Mowinckel P et al. Severe asthma in childhood: assessed in 10 year olds in a birth cohort study. Allergy. 2008 Aug; 63 (8): 1054-60.
121. Lang A, Mowinckel P, Sachs-Olsen C, Riiser A, Lunde J, Carlsen KH, et al. Asthma severity in childhood, untangling clinical phenotypes. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 Sep; 21 (6): 945-53.
122. Fitzpatrick AM, Teague WG, Meyers DA, Peters SP Li X, Li H, et al. Heterogeneity of severe asthma in childhood: Confirmation by cluster analysis of children in the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Severe Asthma Research Program. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Feb; 127 (2): 382-9 e13.
123. Lodrup Carlsen KC, Hedlin G, Bush A, Wennergren G, de Benedictis FM, De Jongste JC, et al. Assessment of problematic severe asthma in children. Eur Respir J. 2011 Feb; 37 (2): 432-40.
124. Walker S, Khan-Wasti S, Fletcher M, Cullinan P, Harris J, Sheikh A. Seasonal allergic rhinitis is associated with a detrimental effect on examination performance in United Kingdom teenagers: case-control study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Aug; 120 (2): 381-7.
125. Balzar S, Fajt ML, Comhair SA, Erzurum SC, Bleecker E, Busse WW, et al. Mast cell phenotype, location, and activation in severe asthma: data from the severe asthma research program. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 1; 183 (3): 299-309.
126. Moore WC, Meyers DA, Wenzel SE, Teague WG, Li H, Li X, et al. Identification of asthma phenotypes using cluster analysis in the Severe Asthma Research Program. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.
2010 Feb 15; 181 (4): 315-23.
127. Auffray C, Adcock IM, Chung KF, Djukanovic R, Pison C, Sterk PJ. An integrative systems biology approach to understanding pulmonary diseases. Chest. 2010 Jun; 137 (6): 1410-6.
128. Lotvall J, Akdis CA, Bacharier LB, Bjermer L, Casale TB, Custovic A, et al. Asthma endotypes: a new approach to classification of disease entities within the asthma syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Feb; 127 (2): 355-60.
129. Brasier AR, Victor S, Boetticher G, Ju H, Lee C, Bleecker ER, et al. Molecular phenotyping of severe asthma using pattern recognition of bronchoalveolar lavage-derived cytokines. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Jan; 121 (1): 30-7 e6.
130. Miller MK, Johnson C, Miller DP, Deniz Y, Bleecker ER, Wenzel SE. Severity assessment in asthma: An evolving concept. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Nov; 116 (5): 990-5.
131. Wenzel SE. Asthma: defining of the persistent adult phenotypes. Lancet. 2006 Aug 26; 368 (9537): 804-13.
132. Haldar P, Pavord ID, Shaw DE, Berry MA, Thomas M, Brightling CE, et al. Cluster analysis and clinical asthma phenotypes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug 1;178 (3):218-24.
133. ten Brinke A, Sterk PJ, Masclee AA, Spinhoven P Schmidt JT, Zwinderman AH, et al. Risk factors of frequent exacerbations in difficult-to-treat asthma. Eur Respir J. 2005 Nov; 26 (5): 812-8.
134. Auffray C, Charron D, Hood L. Predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory medicine: back to the future. Genome Med. 2010; 2 (8): 57.
135. Bousquet J, Schunemann HJ, Bousquet PJ, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Casale TB, et al. How to design and evaluate randomized controlled trials in immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: an ARIA-GA(2)LEN statement. Allergy. 2011 Jun; 66 (6): 765-74.
nEflMATPMHECKAfl ^APMAKOflOrMfl /2011/ TOM 8/ № 4
