CC BY
39Список литературы
1. Кулагина И.Ю., Колюцкий В.Н. Возрастная психология: Полный жизненный цикл развития человека: учеб. пособие для студентов высших учебных заведений. М.: Сфера, 2001. 464с.
2. Лютова Е.К. Развитие личности и креативность школьников с различными уровневыми и структурными характеристиками интеллекта: автореф. дис. ... канд. психол. наук. СПб., 2000. 24 с.
3. Выготский Л.С. Собрание сочинений М.: 1982. т.2.
4. Психология. //Под ред. А.В.Петровского, М.Г.Ярашевского. М., 1991. С.247.
5. Рензулли Дж. Модель школьного обучения. //Современные концепции творчества и одаренности. //Под ред. Д. Б. Богоявленской. -М., 1997. С. 214-215.
6. Жураев У.Т. Практический анализ функционирования ситуационных и личностных детерминант волевой деятельности // Проблемы Науки. 2020. №1 (146).
SELF-RELATION AS A PHENOMENON OF PSYCHOLOGY
Kuzmenko T.R.
Kuzmenko Tatyana Ruslanovna - STudent, PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT PEDAGOGICAL INSTITUTE BELGOROD NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY, BELGOROD
Abstract: due to the fact that the concept of self-relation is relevant today, it makes sense to understand its nature in order to understand what psychologists are dealing with. Keywords: self-relation, «I», domestic psychology.
Today, the concept of self-relation is becoming more and more relevant, because it is at the heart of the harmonious development of the individual. In General, if we consider the system of relations in which the formation of a person takes place, as such, the attitude to oneself in a certain period of life becomes one of the leading ones. Thus, it is possible to evaluate people and analyze their actions only through the prism of their ideas, expectations, requirements for themselves, etc. Therefore, to be aware of the patterns that occur in society, first of all, you should learn to understand and love yourself.
There are many approaches to the concept of self-relation, but this definition was first revealed in the philosophy of G. Hegel. In psychology, gradually distinguish the approach that States that it is the attitude to oneself that is the object of psychological analysis, this view is held by uJames, V. V. Stolin, S. R. Pantileev.
The main problem of our article as a self-relation is revealed in the course of psychological science. In other words, we will consider the history of the formation of the concept of self-relation, the approaches of various authors to this problem and the content of this phenomenon.
So, the concept of self-relation is quite young, it was introduced in 1974 by the Georgian psychologist N. I. Saijveladze. In his understanding, it is the attitude to oneself in a situation of need satisfaction [1]. But the prerequisites for the formation of this concept were laid down in philosophy, so G. Hegel, who considered the attitude to oneself as something inseparable from self-consciousness, in turn, he distinguished three forms of development of the latter: the individual, where the individual is aware of his existence and equates or distinguishes himself from others; cognizers-a person learns his inner potential through the knowledge of another person; whereas the universal is the equalization of oneself with
others, the awareness of General moral categories. Other philosophers also touched on self-relation, but did not consider it a separate phenomenon and more concerned with its individual components, such as values, self-consciousness, etc [1].
In the course of domestic psychology, self-relation is considered by many authors, some of them we will now consider. N. Sarjveladze, whom we have already mentioned, treated this concept as a "social installation", in his opinion, he refers to the attitude to himself as a system of "personality - social world" and is one of the structural units of the dispositional core. "N. I. Sarjveladze developed his own scheme of the structure of self-relation, based on the theory of installation. When developing the structure of self-relation, he pointed out the existence of two axes of orientation: 1) what the installation is aimed at, what is its subject content, and 2) how the installation is aimed at its subject, what is the method of attitude. Self-relation, according to N. I. Sarjveladze, is an establishment education that has three components: cognitive, emotional and conative" [4]. Stolin, which primarily considered the identity, said that "the predisposition to a specific interaction of personality with society and himself, presented as some readiness or fixed installation the subject of life"[2]. To him self, it was assumed a product of consciousness, the psychologist defined this concept as a superficial representation of the "I" subject.
Also, one of the researchers of self-relation was S. R. Pantileev, he studied this problem in depth, based on the works of V. V. Stolin. The researcher believed that this is a hierarchical system and associated it with a measure of satisfaction of the leading motives and needs. In addition, it allocates a three-tier system, which includes self-esteem, automate, and self-abasement. Each of the components has its own substructure, so self-esteem - self-confidence, reflected self-attitude, self-guidance, social desirability of the " I»;
autosympathy - self-acceptance, self-worth, self-attachment; self-deprecation - internal conflict and self-blame [2].
I. Chesnokova had a different point of view, she considered self-relation through the phenomenon of self-consciousness, she said that "a multi-Stage and complex process of self-knowledge is necessarily associated with a variety of experiences, which are also generalized in the future in the emotional and value attitude of the individual to himself. The generalized results of self-knowledge of emotional and value attitude to oneself are fixed in the corresponding self-assessment, which is included in the regulation of personality behavior as one of the defining moments. In the real life of a person, self-consciousness manifests itself in the inseparable unity of its individual internal processes - self-knowledge, emotional and value attitude to oneself and self-regulation of behavior in various forms of interaction of people in society" [3].
So, we have considered how the phenomenon of self-relation in psychology was formed, some approaches to it and the structure in the understanding of various authors. From all the material presented above, we can conclude that self-relation is one of the key and complex definitions of psychological science. To date, there is also no clear definition of this concept.
References
1. Sarjveladze N.I. Personality and its interaction with the social environment: monograph. Tbilisi: "Metsniereba", 1989. 206 p.
2. Panteleev S.R. self-Relation as an emotional-evaluative system: monograph. Moscow: Mosk Publishing house. UN-TA, 2011. 100 p.
3. Chesnokova I.I. Problems of self-awareness in psychology: monograph. Moscow: Nauka, 2007, 144 p.
4. Nikiforova M.V. Change in the ratio of participants in the long-term Art therapy group. [Electronic resource] / M.V. Nikiforova/ / - access Mode:http://elib.sfukras.ru/bitstream/handle/2311/28875/nikiforova_0.pdf?sequence=2/ (date of access: 02.05.2020).
