CC BY
24
Бухгалтерский учет, анализ и аудит
DOI: 10.14529/em180310
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR LEASE FINANCING RECEIVABLES AN PAYABLES
I.N. Dmitrieva, A.F. Chernenko
South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
Financial lease analysis methods, presented in various sources, reveal only the efficiency of the use of the subject of lease. At the same time the available sources do not consider the analysis of debt, which also arises when concluding a leasing contract. In this regard, the article presents the methodological basis for the analysis of lease financing receivables and payables, which include: estimation of the share of debt in balance sheet total and estimation of the dynamics of its change; determination of debt profitability and turnover. The indicator of lease financing debt profitability is formed by the method of proportional-cost division of the degree of resources (capital) participation in profit-making, which makes it possible to determine the profitability of specific assets and their sources. It is suggested to accept the amount of leasing payments received by the lessor as turnover, when determining the period of turnover of accounts receivable. The amount of leasing payments paid by the lessee is suggested to be accepted as a turnover, when determining the period of turnover of accounts payable.
Keywords: financial lease, leasing efficiency, accounts receivable, accounts payable, profitability, turnover.
Introduction
Leasing operations are present on the capital markets for more than 50 years and nowadays they are the most popular and requested type of operations. The global leasing service market is approximately estimated as $ 350 billion [19]. Despite the tough economic environment in 2014-2015, leasing is still a highly demandable operation in Russia. For the past 5 years the amount of conducted leasing deals reached 6000 billion roubles and since 2016 the significant growth of the leasing deals amount becomes evident: in 2016 the growth rate figured up to 36 % and in 2017 - 48 % [22]. Ural federal district is found on the 3d place in the leasing business, behind Moscow and St. Petersburg. Therefore, leasing operations appear to be a topical issue today.
The purpose of this work is to develop methodological basis for the analysis of lease financing receivables and payables.
To achieve this aim the authors used the already existing approaches to leasing operations analysis. They have developed indicators for evaluating the state and dynamics of changes in the amount of leasing payments debt, and also indicators of profitability and turnover rate of receivables and payables.
1. Theoretical framework for the analysis of accounts receivable and payable
A prospective and retrospective analysis of leasing operations was previously considered by the authors in various sources [2, 16], but the focus was mainly on assessing the effectiveness of the use of the leasing mechanism in the acquisition of property and analysis of the subject of the financial lease agreement: the return on assets, turnover, and profitability of leasing property. At the same time, besides leasing
property, at the conclusion of the leasing contract there is also a debt: for the lessor - debt receivable; for the lessee - the debt payable. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the analysis of lease financing receivables and payables in order to develop the methodological basis for leasing operations.
After careful analysis of the methods of leasing operations analysis which are presented in domestic and international sources (textbooks, monographs, periodicals and scientific publications) authors got the following results: leasing operations efficiency is presented as a prospective analysis or analysis of leased property in the available sources, the analysis of the leasing payment debt is not disclosed at all there. Therefore it is decided to conduct the analysis of ordinary receivables and payables.
In the works [4, 8, 20, 21] analysis of the effectiveness of leasing operations is a comparative analysis of discounted cash flows arising in connection with the implementation of a leasing transaction and when buying property under a loan agreement. Therefore, this analysis is conducted with the aim of selecting the optimal source of financing for the investment project and does not allow analyzing the leasing payment debt.
The source [7] provides «a system of economic indicators for the analysis of leasing operations», which includes:
1) the renewal rate by leasing;
2) the renewal rate of fixed assets by leasing;
3) the coefficient of disposal of leased property;
4) the coefficient of shift and leasing of property.
The presented analysis of leasing operations can
be carried out (as the author himself notes [7]) in case the leased property is on the balance of the lessee. The disadvantage of the presented «system» is that the au-
thor considered the analysis of only leased property (the structure and dynamics of leased property, its share in the amount of fixed assets), rather than leasing operations, as stated in the title. Therefore, it is impossible to analyze the debt using the indicators presented.
In [3], the author considers the non-factor analysis as the priority direction, and the study of absolute indicators, adjusted for the time factor. It is especially relevant (as the author himself notes) while moving to international financial reporting standards, according to which accounts receivable and payable should be reflected with consideration of the loss of the debt value in time [3]. However, a comparative analysis of the discounted amounts of accounts receivable and payable is not applicable to the analysis of leasing transactions, as a result of the fact that the same amount will be the receivable for the lessor and the payable for the lessee.
The sources [17, 18] give an estimate of accounts receivable and payable on the basis of horizontal and vertical analysis, which allows us to assess only the structure and dynamics of changes in debt. In works [1, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 17], the ratio of receivables (payables) turnover is determined by the ratio of the sales proceeds to the average annual value of the receivable (payable) debt. The proposed method ignores the fact that sales revenue was obtained from another part of the capital [14]. The source [1] does not specify what amount of debt to take for the calculation: the average value or the absolute indebtedness for a certain date. This all limits the application of the proposed method in practice and does not allow us to draw conclusions about the state of debt.
2. Methodological basis of the analysis of lease financing payables and receivables
An analysis of the debt on a leasing payment
should be considered from the position of the subject of the leasing transaction, since the lessor has a receivable, and the lessee has a payable debt. Taking as a basis the structure of debt analysis at the source [14], we will present the methodological basis for the analysis of a leasing payment debt, which is carried out in three stages.
The purpose of the analysis of lessor's leasing payment debt is to assess the receivables' state, dynamics of changes, and repayment period.
Stage I. An estimation of the share of debt in balance sheet total and an estimation the dynamics of its change. Usually a leasing agreement is concluded for a long period; therefore, accounts receivable are mostly long-term. However, cases of short-term transactions and the transfer of debt from long-term to short-term are not excluded.
For convenience in calculating and evaluating the structure and dynamics of the change in the receivables, we use Table 1.
The indicators calculated in Table 1 provide an overview of the existence and changes of the lease financing receivables in the period under consideration. As can be seen from the table, the most part of the organization's funds - 62 % at the beginning of the year and 71 %> and the end of the year - is diverted into the accounts receivable of the lessor.
For the year, the total amount of lease financing receivables was increased by 14.9 %. In general, the debt is long-term - 78.2 % at the beginning of the year and 81.6 % at the end of the year. During the period in question, the share of long-term debt increased significantly - by 20 %. A substantial share of long-term debt means that leasing contracts are mostly concluded for a long term and the subject of the leasing agreement is recorded on the balance sheet of the lessee.
Table 1
Structure and dynamics of changes in the absolute value of lease financing receivables
Start of the year End of the year Change
Index value, balance value, balance value, balance growth rate
thousand sheet tot. thousand sheet tot. thousand sheet tot.
roubles share, % roubles share, % roubles share, %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
I. lease financing
receivables, in- 37 740 62,0 43 380 71,0 5 640 9,0 14,9
cluding
long-term 29 500 78,2 35 400 81,6 5 900 3,4 20,0
short-term 8 240 21,8 7 980 18,4 -260 -3,4 -3,2
II. Balance sheet total 60 800 100,0 61 080 100,0 280 0,0 0,5
NB: 1) the table is calculated as follows: 3 = 2.I / 2.II * 100; 5 = 4.I / 4.II * 100;
6 = 4 - 2; 7 = 5 - 3;
8 = 6 / 2 * 100;
2) the share of lease financing receivables is calculated from the balance sheet total. Shares of long-term and short-term debts are calculated from the amount of lease financing receivables.
Short-term leasing payment debts are 21.8 % and 18.4 %, respectively, during the period in question the share of short-term debt was decreased by 3.2 %. The presence of short-term receivables may indicate that the lessor has short-term leases and (or) as of the reporting date, the accrued current lease payments are not paid off.
Thus, the size and structure of the receivables of an economic entity testifies to the specific nature of the leasing activity and is believed to be acceptable.
Stage II. Determining the profitability of receivables.
Profitability means «efficiency», «cost-effectiveness», «viability» [11]. Usually, this indicator is determined by the ratio of the total amount of profit to the average amount for the analyzed period, the cost of only the studied resource, ignoring the fact that this profit is obtained through the use of other resources [15]. «It seems only plausible to correlate the part of the profit, acquired (conditionally or unconditionally) through utilizing the resource under consideration with the cost of the resource, and not the whole profit. Therefore, the profit (income) could be divided between different kinds of resources according to the part they took in its acquisition, which is justified by their expenditure in the cost estimate» [15]. In other words, the profitability of a particular asset or the source of its acquisition shows the amount of income in percent that this resource brings to the organization.
The profitability of an individual asset is equal to the ratio of the share of profit corresponding to the degree of participation of the analyzed asset in its acquisition, to the average value of this asset for the analyzed period [13].
Accordingly, the indicator of profitability of lease financing receivables, formed by the method of proportional-cost division of the degree in which the resources take part in profit-making, is determined by the formula
Px-
il cur
Pr I —
Rl с
(1)
where Prl is the profitability of lease financing receivables; P is the amount of profit from sales received by the enterprise for the period under study; R l cur is the amount of current VAT exclusive lease financing receivables; C ot - total resources spent on profit-making; R l av - average value of VAT exclusive lease financing receivables.
Stage III. Identification of the lease financing receivables turnover period. Accounts receivable commits a turnover as it is repaid, so the value of its turnover is the amount of its repayment.
The lease financing receivables turnover period (PT R i) is determined by the formula
PTR t= (2)
PS r l - the amount of settled lease financing receivables over a year (the sum of charged and settled lease payments).
The period of the accounts receivable turnover shows how much time in years the debt will be repaid in the amount of average balances.
Let's consider an example of calculation of lease financing receivables profitability and turnover. For example, the profit for the reporting period was 8,800 thousand roubles, the amount of current VAT excluded lease financing receivables amounted to 9,850 thousand roubles, the amount of repaid lease payments for the year is 12,200 thousand roubles, the total cost of resources to receive profit amounted to 39,060 thousand roubles, the average value of VAT excluded accounts receivable - 40,560 thousand roubles.
Define the profitability of accounts receivable under the formula 1:
Pr I —
Rl С
■ — 5 %.
where AB R1 is an average balance of lease financing receivables;
Define the period of turnover of accounts receivable under the formula 2:
ABn1 = 1^=3,3 K 1 PSRI 12 200 J
Thus, the profitability of lease financing receivables accounted for 5 %, and the turnover period was 3.3 years. Accordingly, accounts receivable in the amount of the average balance will be repaid in 3 years and 4 months.
The purpose of the analysis of the lease payment debt from the lessee is to assess the state, dynamics of changes and the length of repayment of accounts payable. The analysis is carried out in three stages.
Stage I. Calculation and estimation of the share of accounts payable as a result of the balance sheet, as well as the dynamics of its change. By analogy with accounts receivable, the calculation and evaluation of the structure and dynamics of changes in accounts payable is given in Table 2.
The calculated indicators provide an overview of the change in accounts payable for the period under study, as well as its significance for the organization. As can be seen from Table 2, the share of accounts payable as a result of the balance sheet is not significant and is 15.2 % at the beginning of the year and 11.6 % and end of the year.
During the reporting period, the total share of leasing payment debt as a result of the balance decreased by 3.6 %. At the beginning and the end of the year, almost all debts are long-term 98 % and 97.3 %, respectively. This indicates that the leasing agreements are concluded for a long time. The presence of short-term accounts payable (2 % and 2.7 % at the beginning and end of the year, respectively) indicates that the lessee has accrued but not repaid current lease payments at the reporting date. For the year, the amount of leasing payment debt is decreased by 20 %.
Table 2
Structure and dynamics of changes in the absolute value of lease financing payables
Start of the year End of the year Change
Index value, balance value, balance value, balance growth rate
thousand sheet tot. thousand sheet tot. thousand sheet tot.
roubles share, % roubles share, % roubles share, %
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
I. Lease financing payables, including 5 000 15,2 4 000 11,6 -1 000 -3,6 -20,0
long-term 4 900 98,0 3 890 97,3 -1 010 -0,7 -20,6
short-term 100 2,0 110 2,7 10 0,7 10,0
II. Balance sheet total 33 000 100,0 34 500 100,0 1 500 0,0 4,6
NB: 1) the table is calculated as follows: 3 = 2.I / 2.II * 100; 5 = 4.I / 4.II * 100;
6 = 4 - 2; 7 = 5 - 3;
8 = 6 / 2 * 100;
2) the share of lease financing payables is calculated from the balance sheet total. Shares of long-term and short-term debts are calculated from the amount of lease financing payables.
Stage II. Determining the profitability of accounts payable.
Having set the task of determining the profitability of accounts payable, it is necessary to answer the question, is there a fee for using it? The answer to this question will influence the procedure for determining profitability [14]. On the one hand, all accounts payable, if not sanctioned not subjected to fines, is considered to be «free». On the other hand, taking into account the specifics of leasing relations, leasing payment debt can be attributed to «paid» as well because the leasing agreement, as well as the loan agreement, is urgent, refundable and payable.
However, there is a significant difference in the calculation of interest on the loan and fees on the leasing. Interest on the loan is accrued by the means of other expenses and in accounting are reflected separately from the principal amount of the loan received obligations (paragraph 7 and 4 of Russian Accounting Regulations 15/2008 «Accounting for borrowing costs and loans»). Remuneration under a leasing agreement is already included in the value of the contract and is not separately recorded in the lessee's account. At the same time, the accounting treatment of leasing payments depends on the terms of the leasing agreement:
a) if the property is reflected in the balance sheet of the enterprise, the entire amount of leasing payments will be reflected in the balance sheet with a gradual decrease in its amount as the debt is paid under the leasing agreement;
b) if the property is reflected on off-balance accounts, then the balance sheet will only reflect the current debt on the leasing payment from the moment of its accrual to the moment of its repayment.
Consequently, if no sanctions and fines were imposed on the payables under consideration on the leas-
ing payment during the analyzed period, then this debt is considered «free».
The indicator of profitability of lease financing payables, formed by the method of proportional-cost division of the degree in which the resources take part in profit-making, is determined by the formula
CI i
_ _ P xc/,
Pc l_ (3)
L I BC BC2 ' V /
where PC l is the profitability of lease financing payables;
P is the the amount of profit from sales received by the enterprise for the period under study;
CI l - average value of lease financing payables
sum;
BC - average balance total for the period under consideration.
Stage III. Identification of the lease financing payables turnover period. Accounts payable commits a turnover as it is repaid, so the value of its turnover is the amount of its repayment.
The lease financing payables turnover period (PT R i) is determined by the formula
PTCI l _ (4)
CI1 PSci(' v '
where ABCI t - is an average balance of lease financing payables; PSCI t is the amount of settled lease financing payables over a year (the sum of settled lease payments)
The period of turnover of accounts payable shows how much time in years this debt will be repaid in the amount of average balances.
Let's consider an example of calculation of lease financing payables profitability and turnover. Let's assume that the profit from sales for the reporting period was 3 500 thousand roubles, the amount of repaid receivables for the year was 1,000 thousand roubles, the remaining data are presented in Table 2.
Define the profitability of accounts payable under the formula 3:
.5000 + 4000. P x CI, 3500 x (-2-)
P c i= = -------=1,4 c
ВС2
,33000_+_34500.2 ( 2 )
Define the period of turnover of accounts payable under the formula 4:
PTCI i =
AB
ci I
,5000 + 4000. ( 2 J
= 4,5 years.
PSci i 1000
Thus, the profitability of lease financing payables for the period under study was 1.4 %, and the turnover period was 4.5 years. Consequently, accounts payable in the amount of the average balance will be repaid in 4 years and 6 months Conclusion
The effectiveness of using a leasing contract for the acquisition of fixed assets is now proven. This can be seen in the analysis of statistical data on the market of leasing services. However, the economic literature does not pay sufficient attention to the analysis of leasing operations, which include the analysis of the subject of the leasing contract and arisen debts.
The authors proposed methodological bases for the analysis of lease financing receivables and payables. The presented analysis allows to estimate a condition and dynamics of debts change, to calculate its profitability and turnover period.
To assess the share of debt as a result of the balance sheet, as well as the dynamics of its change, a table is proposed that makes it convenient to calculate the required indicators and visualize them. The indicator of profitability of lease financing receivables and payables is formed by the method of proportional-cost division of the degree of participation of assets and their sources in making a profit. When determining the period of debt turnover, the amount of repaid lease payments is taken as turnover.
The indicators of efficiency of leased property in the source [16] were considered earlier by the authors, as well as the methodological basis of the analysis of lease financing payables presented in this paper, will allow the economic entity to evaluate the efficiency of leasing operations in a complex.
References
1. Berdnikova L.F., Odarich V.V. [On the analysis of the effectiveness of the use of receivables and payables]. Karel'skiy nauchnyy zhurnal [Karelian Scientific Journal], 2016, no. 4(17), pp. 56-59. (in Russ.)
2. Dmitrieva I.N. [Leasing and credit: comparative analysis with reference to strategic analysis]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya [Financial Analytics: Science and Experience], 2010, no. 10(34), pp. 29-40. (in Russ.)
3. Zaretskaya V.G. [Evaluation and analysis of accounts receivable and accounts payable taking into account the time factor]. Mezhdunarodnyy bukhgalterskiy uchet [International Accounting], 2014, no. 29, pp. 44-53. (in Russ.)
4. Kovalev V.V. Lizing: finansovye, uchetno-analiticheskie i pravovye aspekty [Leasing: financial, accounting, analytical and legal aspects]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2011. 448 p.
5. Kravchenko Ye.N., Tazhibov T.G. [Analysis of accounts receivable and accounts payable for tax consulting purposes]. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo [Business. Education. Law], 2013, no. 4(25), pp. 244-248. (in Russ.)
6. Naumenko T.S. [The main stages of a comprehensive analysis of accounts receivable]. Nauchnyy vestnik Yuzhnogo instituta menedzhmenta [Scientific Bulletin of the Southern Institute of Management], 2016, no. 3(15), pp. 50-54. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.31775/2305-3100-2016-3-50-54
7. Naumkina N.A. Uchet i analiz lizingovykh operatsiy v deyatel'nosti kommercheskikh organizatsiy -lizingopoluchateley [Accounting and analysis of leasing operations in the activities of commercial organizations -lessees. Abstract of Cand. econ. sci. diss.]. Samara, 2012. 26 p.
8. Panina I.V. Uchet i analiz lizingovykh operatsiy [Accounting and analysis of leasing operations]. Voronezh, 2005. 288 p.
9. Plastinina V.G. [Comparative analysis of accounts receivable and accounts payable]. Mezhdunarodnyy akademicheskiy vestnik [International Academic Journal], 2015, no. 3(9), pp. 68-71. (in Russ.)
10. Popov V.V., Kolbasina Ye.I. [Methodology of the Analysis of the Turnover of Receivables and Payables]. Universitetskiy kompleks kak regional'nyy tsentr obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury [University complex as a regional center for education, science and culture. Proc. of All-Russia sci.-method. conf.]. Orenburg, 2016, pp. 1536-1541. (in Russ.)
11. Lapusta M.G., Nikol'skiy P.S. Sovremennyy finansovo-kreditnyy slovar' [Contemporary financial and credit dictionary]. Moscow, 2002. 567 p.
12. Tolkacheva Ye.G. [Analysis methods of accounts receivable of an organization]. Potrebitel'skaya kooperatsiya [Consumer Cooperation], 2011, no. 1(32), pp. 31-37. (in Russ.)
13. Chernenko A.F. Analizpokazateley finansovogopolozheniya ifinansovykh rezul'tatovpredpriyatiya [Analysis of indicators of financial situation and financial results of an enterprise]. Chelyabinsk, 2006. 274 p.
14. Chernenko A.F., Basharina A.V. Analiz finansovoy otchetnosti [Analysis of financial statements]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks Publ., 2010. 285 p.
15. Chernenko A.F. [Problems of assessing profitability and a way of resolving them]. Izvestiya Chelyabinskogo nauchnogo tsentra UrO RAN [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the RAS], 2003, no. 1, pp. 115-119. (in Russ.)
16. Chernenko A.F., Dmitrieva I.N. Finansovyy menedzhment i audit lizingovykh operatsiy [Financial management and audit of leasing operations]. Chelyabinsk, 2011. 203 p.
17. Sheremet A.D., Nagashev Ye.V. Metodika fmansovogo analiza deyatel'nosti kommercheskikh organizatsiy [Methods of financial analysis of commercial organizations]. Moscow, 2008. 208 p.
18. Voytolovskiy N.V., Kalinina A.P., Mazurova I.I. (Eds.) Ekonomicheskiy analiz. Osnovy teorii. Kompleksnyy analiz khozyaystvennoy deyatel'nosti organizatsii [Economic analysis. Fundamentals of the theory. Comprehensive analysis of the economic activities of the organization]. Moscow, 2008. 520 p.
19. Islam M.A., Islam M.R., Siddiqui M.H. Lease Financing of Bangladesh: a Descriptive Analysis. International Journal of Economics, finance and Management Sciences, 2014, no. 1(2), pp. 33-42. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.15
20. Miroshnikova T. Formation of an Effective Mechanism of Financial and Credit Support Reproduction Process. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015, no. 5(6), pp. 84-92. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s3p84
21. Zaridis A.D. Comparative Analysis of Leasing's Evaluation as a Method of Financing Investments in Greek Agribusiness Sector Before and During Greek Economic Crisis. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 2017, no. 2(2), pp. 79-86. DOI: 10.11648/j.jbed.20170202.12
22. Rynok lizinga: itogi 2017 goda i perspektivy razvitiya [Leasing Market: Results of 2017 and Development Prospects]. Available at: https://raexpert.ru/researches/leasing/2017/att1.
Irina N. Dmitrieva, candidate of economic Sciences, associate Professor of accounting, analysis and audit, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, indmit82@mail.ru.
Aleksey F. Chernenko, doctor of Economics, Professor of accounting, analysis and audit departments, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, 2052@bk.ru.
Received August 10, 2018
УДК 338.2 йО!: 10.14529/ет180310
МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ДЕБИТОРСКОЙ И КРЕДИТОРСКОЙ ЗАДОЛЖЕННОСТИ ПО ЛИЗИНГОВОМУ ФИНАНСИРОВАНИЮ
И.Н. Дмитриева, А.Ф. Черненко
Южно-Уральский государственный университет, г. Челябинск, Россия
Методы анализа финансового лизинга, представленные в различных источниках, выявляют только эффективность использования предмета лизинга. При этом доступные источники не учитывают анализ задолженности, который также возникает при заключении договора лизинга. В связи с этим в статье представлены методологические основы анализа дебиторской и кредиторской задолженности по лизинговому финансированию, которые включают: оценку доли задолженности в общем балансе и оценку динамики ее изменения; определение доходности и оборачиваемости долга. Показатель доходности заемного лизингового финансирования формируется методом пропорционально-стоимостного деления степени участия ресурсов (капитала) в получении прибыли, что позволяет определить доходность конкретных активов и их источников. Сумму лизинговых платежей, полученных лизингодателем, предлагается принимать в качестве оборота при определении срока оборота дебиторской задолженности. Сумму лизинговых платежей, уплаченных лизингополучателем, предлагается принимать в качестве оборота при определении срока оборота кредиторской задолженности.
Ключевые слова: финансовый лизинг, эффективность лизинга, дебиторская задолженность, кредиторская задолженность, рентабельность, оборачиваемость.
Литература
1. Бердникова, Л. Ф. К вопросу об анализе эффективности использования дебиторской и кредиторской задолженности /Л.Ф. Бердникова, В.В. Одарич //Карельский научный журнал. - 2016. - № 4 (17). - С. 56-59.
2. Дмитриева, И.Н. Лизинг и кредит: сравнительный анализ применительно к стратегическому анализу / И.Н. Дмитриева // «Финансовая аналитика: проблемы и решения». - М.: ООО «Издательский дом ФИНАНСЫ и КРЕДИТ». - 2010. - № 10 (34). - С. 29-40.
3. Зарецкая, В.Г. Оценка и анализ дебиторской и кредиторской задолженностей с учетом фактора времени /В.Г. Зарецкая //Международный бухгалтерский учет. - 2014. - № 29. - С. 44-53.
4. Ковалев, В.В. Лизинг: финансовые, учетно-аналитические и правовые аспекты: учебно-практическое пособие /В.В, Ковалев. -М.: Проспект, 2011.- 448 с.
5. Кравченко, Е.Н. Анализ дебиторской и кредиторской задолженности для целей налогового консультирования / Е.Н. Кравченко, Т.Г. Тажибов // Бизнес. Образование. Право.- 2013. - № 4 (25). -С. 244-248.
6. Науменко, Т. С. Основные этапы комплексного анализа дебиторской задолженности / Т. С. Нау-менко //Научный вестник Южного института менеджмента. - 2016. - № 3 (15). - С. 50-54.
7. Наумкина, Н.А. Учет и анализ лизинговых операций в деятельности коммерческих организаций -лизингополучателей: автореф. дис. ... канд. экон. наук /Н.А. Наумкина, 2012. - 26 с.
8. Панина, И.В. Учет и анализ лизинговых операций: монография /И.В. Панина; под ред. Д.А. Ендо-вицкого. - Воронеж: Изд-во Воронеж. гос. ун-та, 2005. - 288 с.
9. Пластинина, В.Г. Сравнительный анализ дебиторской и кредиторской задолженности / В.Г. Пластинина //Международный академический вестник. - 2015. - № 3 (9). - С. 68-71.
10. Попов, В.В. Методология анализа оборачиваемости дебиторской и кредиторской задолженности / В. В. Попов, Е. И. Колбасина // Университетский комплекс как региональный центр образования, науки и культуры: материалы Всероссийской научно-методической конференции, 2016. - С. 1536-1541.
11. Современный финансово-кредитный словарь / под общ.ред. М.Г. Лапусты, П.С. Никольского. -2-е изд., доп. -М.: ИНФРА-М, 2002. - 567 с.
12. Толкачева, Е.Г. Методические аспекты анализа дебиторской задолженности организации /Е.Г. Толкачева //Потребительская кооперация. - 2011. - № 1 (32). - С. 31-37.
13. Черненко, А.Ф. Анализ показателей финансового положения и финансовых результатов предприятия: монография /А.Ф Черненко. - Челябинск, 2006. - 274 с.
14. Черненко, А.Ф. Анализ финансовой отчетности: учебное пособие /А.Ф. Черненко, А.В. Башари-на. - Ростов н/Д: Феникс, 2010. - 285 с.
15. Черненко, А.Ф. Проблемы оценки рентабельности и пути их разрешения / А.Ф. Черненко// Известия Челябинского научного центра УрО РАН. - 2003. - № 1. - С. 115-119.
16. Черненко, А.Ф. Финансовый менеджмент и аудит лизинговых операций: монография / А.Ф. Черненко, И.Н. Дмитриева. - Челябинск: Издательский центр ЮУрГУ, 2011. - 203 с.
17. Шеремет, А.Д. Методика финансового анализа деятельности коммерческих организаций /А.Д. Шеремет, Е.В. Нагашев. - 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. -М.: ИНФРА-М, 2008. - 208 с.
18. Экономический анализ. Основы теории. Комплексный анализ хозяйственной деятельности организации: учебник / под ред. Н.В. Войтоловского, А.П. Калининой, И.И. Мазуровой. - М.: Высшее образование, 2008. - 520 с.
19. Islam, M.A. Lease financing of Bangladesh: A descriptive analysis / Islam, M.A., M.R. Islam, M.H. Siddiqui //International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences. - 2014. - № 1 (2). - Р. 3342. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20140201.15
20. Miroshnikova, T. Formation of an Effective Mechanism of Financial and Credit Support Reproduction Process / T. Miroshnikova // Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. - 2015. - № 5 (6). - P. 84-92. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s3p84
21. Zaridis, A.D. Comparative Analysis of Leasing's Evaluation as a Method of Financing Investments in Greek Agribusiness Sector Before and During Greek Economic Crisis / A.D. Zaridis // Journal of Business and Economic Development. - 2017. - № 2 (2). - P. 79-86. DOI: 10.11648/j.jbed.20170202.12
22. Рынок лизинга: итоги 2017 года и перспективы развития. - https://raexpert.ru/ researches/leasing/2017/att1.
Дмитриева Ирина Николаевна, кандидат экономических наук, доцент кафедры бухгалтерского учета, анализа и аудита, Южно-Уральский государственный университет (г. Челябинск), indmit82@mail.ru
Черненко Алексей Федорович, доктор экономических наук, профессор кафедры бухгалтерского учета, анализа и аудита, Южно-Уральский государственный университет (г. Челябинск), 2052@bk.ru
ОБРАЗЕЦ ЦИТИРОВАНИЯ
Dmitrieva, I.N. Research Methodology for Lease Financing Receivables and Payables / I.N. Dmitrieva, A.F. Chernenko // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия «Экономика и менеджмент». - 2018. - Т. 12, № 3. - С. 92-98. DOI: 10.14529/em180310
Поступила в редакцию 10 августа 2018 г.
FOR CITATION
Dmitrieva I.N., Chernenko A.F. Research Methodology for Lease Financing Receivables and Payables. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Economics and Management, 2018, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 92-98. DOI: 10.14529/em180310
