CC BY
15
_LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGES (UDC 81)_
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.2021.28.4.1
РЕПРЕЗЕНТАЦИЯ КОНЦЕПТОВ ФРАЗЕОЛОГИЗМАМИ С ОНИМАМИ В АНГЛИЙСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ
Научная статья
Шевченко Е.М. *
ORCID: 0000-0001-9293-1424, Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет, Белгород, Россия
* Корреспондирующий автор (lenlen2007[at]mail.ru)
Аннотация
Статья посвящена проблеме преломления реальности в нашем сознании в виде концептов, репрезентированных на языковом уровне фразеологизмами. В фокусе внимания когнитивной лингвистики находится типология знаний и их репрезентация на концептуальном и языковом уровнях. Концептуализация устанавливает связь между языковыми единицами и концептами, демонстрируя репрезентацию знаний, которые могут получать осмысление в различных когнитивных контекстах. Актуальность статьи определяется многоуровневой теорией значений языковых единиц и заключается в изучении концептуальных структур, лежащих в основе фразеологических единиц с онимами. Цель статьи - рассмотреть матричный формат репрезентации концептов ФЕ с онимами. Автор акцентирует внимание на матричном формате когнитивных знаний. Когнитивная матрица объединяет различные когнитивные контексты, которые определяют формирование и понимание фразеологических единиц со значением онимов. В результате проведенного исследования автор выделяет четыре уровня концептуализации фразеологических единиц с онимами на основе знаний о когнитивных механизмах, формирующих значения фразеологических единиц. Перспективу для исследования представляет четвертая группа фразеологических единиц с интертекстуальными компонентами-онимами, которые порождают интертекстуальные концепты.
Ключевые слова: концептуализация, концепт, фразеологическая единица, оним, матрица.
REPRESENTATION OF CONCEPTS BY PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH ONYMS IN ENGLISH
Research article
Shevchenko Y.M. *
ORCID: 0000-0001-9293-1424, Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod, Russia
* Corresponding author (lenlen2007[at]mail.ru)
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the problem of reality refraction in our consciousness in the form of concepts, represented at the linguistic level by phraseological units. Cognitive linguistics focuses on the typology of knowledge and its representation at the conceptual and language levels. Conceptualization establishes a connection between language units and concepts, demonstrating the representation of knowledge that can be comprehended in various cognitive contexts. The relevance of the article is determined by a multilevel theory of language units' meanings, and it lies in the study of conceptual structures underlying the phraseological units with onyms. The aim of the article is to study concepts' representation by phraseological units with onyms as a matrix format of knowledge. The author underlines the matrix format of cognitive knowledge. Cognitive matrix unites different cognitive context which determine the formation and understanding of phraseological units with onyms' meaning. As a result of the research, the author differentiates three levels of conceptualization of phraseological units with onyms based on the knowledge about the cognitive mechanisms that form the meanings of phraseological units. The research perspective represents the fourth group of onyms, not so recurrent, but containing intertextual components producing intertextual concepts.
Keywords: conceptualization, concept, phraseological unit, onym, matrix.
Introduction
The surrounding reality receives its refraction in our consciousness in the form of concepts, which are represented at the linguistic level in the form of linguistic units. Concept is "the basic unit of a person's mental code" [5, P. 257]. It can be verbalized not only by words, but also by phraseological units (PU). "The nature of the meaning of a PU is closely connected with the background knowledge of a native speaker, with the practical experience of an individual, with the cultural and historical traditions of the people who speak this language» [6, P. 176]. A PU condenses information about the national and cultural characteristics of a particular ethnic group. In the process of categorizing the surrounding reality, "cognitive knowledge is enriched with linguistic, the indirect form of expression of which is phraseological meanings» [4, P. 211]. The cognitive contexts in which phraseological units comprehended are very diverse. The multidimensional nature of knowledge allows us to talk about its special format; this is the knowledge of a matrix format, that is, a system of interrelated cognitive contexts [2, P. 53].
"Naming cognizable situations, phraseology, on the one hand, takes in and captures in its meanings the generalized experience of cognitive development of reality, and on the other - it introduces language signs into the established language relations" [1, P. 79], verbalizing concepts. An important feature of the phraseological verbalization of a concept with onyms is its multi-level nature. Following Y.S. Stepanov [3, P. 75] we think, that a concept actualized by a PU has: 1. an "active layer", 2. a "passive" layer or a historical and cultural layer, 3. the layer connected with an internal form or etymology. In the "active"
layer of a concept, knowledge understandable to all native speakers is actualized. The "passive" layer contains additional knowledge about concepts, considered in a diachronic aspect. The layer connected with etymology highlights the "original essence" which underlies the basis of phraseological units. Thus, a concept is structured, being a complex multi-layered phenomenon. We suggest, that taking into consideration the structure of a concept, as well as the features of a PU as one of the language signs that verbalizes the concept, conceptual processes can be considered at the level of: 1. knowledge underlying the onyms' components in PUs (a first-level conceptualization); 2. knowledge about the structures that form the "original essence" or inner form of PUs (a second-level conceptualization); 3. knowledge encoded in the actual meanings of PUs (a third-level conceptualization).
It is evident that conceptual structures containing multidimensional knowledge has a multi-level nature and at the language level they can be represented by PUs with onyms. It should be noted that by onyms we mean proper names used as common nouns. There are many varieties of onyms: mythonyms, zoonyms, toponyms, but in this paper we consider the anthroponyms, since the analysis of the actual material showed that they are the most recurrent group. Taking into consideration the fact, that anthroponyms are precedent texts, that is, they appeal to well-known characters, prototypical situations [7, P. 130], the object of the study is a PU with onyms, the subject is their conceptualization. The material for the study includes 253 units, compiled by the method of continuous scanning of the phraseological dictionaries.
Methods
According to the goals and objectives of the study, the following methods were used: conceptual and etymological analyses.
Results
The results of the conceptual analysis of PUs with onyms showed that a first-level conceptualization is connected with the knowledge underlying the onyms' components in PUs. It can be illustrated by the following PUs: Tom fool, Tom Tailor, Tom Thumb, Peeping Thomas, nervous Nellie, Jack the Lad, clever Dick, smart Aleck, Billy - no friends, Johnny-come-lately. It follows from above examples that this group of PUs contains onyms of folk origin, the meanings of these PUs are evident without any etymological analysis: they have sheer inner forms. The onyms' adjacent components give a semantic "charge " to the whole PU, actualizing multidimensional knowledge. Thus, PUs with onyms, imbued with cultural meanings, can represent concepts by themselves as they are precedent: native speakers have certain associations with them. Another group of PUs with onyms illustrates second-level conceptual structures forming the basis of the secondary nomination signs. This group can be illustrated with PUs which onyms' components go back to real historical folk prototypes: Hobson choice, Real McCoy, Tom oBedlam. In these PUs such as Hobson s choice etymological analysis helps to reveal the origin of proper names. The actual meaning of the PU "forced choice, lack of choice". It goes back to a certain Hobson, the owner of a paid stable in Cambridge in the XVI century, who obliged his clients to take only the horse closest to the exit [10]. In these PUs a second-level conceptualization takes place since the etymological analysis highlights the knowledge of the structures that form the internal form of the PU.
A third-level conceptualization is typical for the PUs which have an onym component representing a historical or a literary hero (an eponym): Cordelia's gift, Darby and Joan, the Admirable Crichton, the thread of Ariadne's, Promethean fire, Adam s ale. To clarify it we can give an example: what will Mrs. Grundy say? A precedent onym "Mrs. Grundy" actualizes the knowledge of the first level: "a hypocrite". At the second level of conceptualization the knowledge of the "original essence" can be represented. The etymological analysis spotlights on the inner form of the PU - "a literary hero". Mrs. Grundy-never appearing on the stage character of the comedy T. Morton (Th. Morton, 1769-1838) "Speed the Plough" - the embodiment of walking morality" [8]; This PU can be conceptualized at the third-level as it reveals the knowledge encoded in the actual meaning of the PU "what will people say?" Another example the thread of Ariadne s goes back to Greek mythology. At the first level of PU conceptualization, the name Ariadne of the mythological character is highlighted, the knowledge of the second level is connected with PU's internal form "daughter of Minos and Pasiphae: she gave Theseus the thread with which he found his way out of the Minotaur's labyrinth" [9], at the third level of PU conceptualization an idea of an actual meaning" the guiding thread" is objectivized.
Proper names Adam and Eve in the PU when Adam delved and Eve span who was then a gentleman? actualize the idea of the progenitors of humanity at the first level of conceptualization. A second-level conceptualization is verbalized with compound nomination "when Adam delved and Eve span" representing an inner form of a "distant past". At the third level additional conceptual features of the PU are objectivized as it was "one of the slogans of the peasants War of 1381, attributed to Monk John Ball who was Wat Tyler's supporter"[8]. The whole PU verbalizes forth-level conceptual processes in modern language; it is used ironically about a person who boasts of his origin.
Conclusion
Generally speaking, the cognitive contexts in which comprehension takes place are diverse and can be represented as components of a matrix providing access to different layers of knowledge. Analyzing 253 phraseological units and cognitive structures underlying them, the author differentiates four groups of PU with onyms which, can be considered at different levels of conceptualization. The first group of PUs with onyms is distinguished on the basis of a separate onyms components' ability to verbalize separate concepts at the first level of conceptualization. These precedent onyms are of folk origin with obscure etymology but understandable to all native speakers. The second group is represented with PUs which onym components go back to real historical folk prototypes, etymological analysis reveals their "original essence". At the second level of conceptualization the knowledge about the structures that form the internal form of these PUs is actualized. A third-level conceptualization is typical for the third group of PUs which has an onym component representing a historical or a literary hero. At this level of conceptualization the knowledge encoded in actual meanings of PUs is objectivized. In conclusion, it
should be noted that the research perspective represents the fourth group of onyms, not so recurrent, but containing intertextual components producing intertextual concepts.
To sum it up, it should be mentioned that the study of concepts' representation by PU with onyms as a matrix format of knowledge helps to investigate different layers of culture and to differentiate additional conceptual features clarifying unique historico-cultural peculiarities.
Конфликт интересов Conflict of Interest
Не указан. None declared.
Список литературы / References
1. Алефиренко Н. Ф. Фразеология в свете современных лингвистических парадигм: Монография. - Москва: ООО «Элпис», 2008. - 271 с.
2. Болдырев, Н. Н. Многоаспектность как особый формат знания и лингвистические методы его исследования / Н. Н. Болдырев // Международный конгресс по когнитивной лингвистике: Сборник материалов. - Тамбов: Издательский дом ТГУ им. Г. Р. Державина, 2008. - 822 с.
3. Константы: словарь русской культуры / Юрий Степанов. - 2. изд., испр. и доп. - Москва: Акад. проект, 2001. -989c.
4. Мелерович, А. М. Изоморфизм между семантикой и формой фразеологической единицы и принципы построения словарных дефиниций / А. М. Мелерович, В. М. Мокиенко // Сборник научных трудов «Слово - сознание - культура». -Москва: «Флинта: Наука», 2006. - 256 с.
5. Стернин И. А. Типы значений и концепт/ И. А. Стернин // Сборник научных трудов «Концептуальное пространство языка». - Тамбов: Изд-во ТГУ им. Г. Р. Державина, 2005. - С. 257 - 282
6. Шевченко Е.М. Гендерные стереотипы во фразеологической картине мира английского языка / Е. М. Шевченко, Е. С. Данилова // Материалы Четвертой международной научной конференции по когнитивной фразеологии «Фразеология в языковой картине мира: когнитивно-прагматические регистры» - Белгород: «ООО Эпицентр», 2019. - С. 176-179.
7. Шевченко Е.М. Прецедентные антропонимы в английском языке / Е. М. Шевченко, А. М. Шевченко // Материалы Третьей международной научно-практической конференции «Инноватика в современном мире: опыт, проблемы и перспективы» - Уфа: Изд. НИЦ Вестник науки, 2020 - С. 129-134.
8. ABBYY Lingvo CD'12 dictionary: Электронный словарь / ABBY Software, 2008. - 1 СD-ROM.
9. Collin's Online Dictionary [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/ (дата обращения: 21.05.2021).
10. Online Etymology Dictionary [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://www.etymonline.com/ (дата обращения: 23.05.2021).
Список литературы на английском / References in English
1. Alefirenko N. F. Frazeologija v svete sovremennyh lingvisticheskih paradigm: [Phraseology in the light of modern linguistic paradigms]: Monograph / N. F. Alefirenko. - Moscow: "Elpis", 2008 - 271 p. [in Russian]
2. Boldyrev, N. N. Mnogoaspektnost' kak osobyy format znaniya i lingvisticheskie metody ego issledovaniya [Multidimensionality as a specific format of knowledge and linguistic methods of its research] / N. N. Boldyrev // Mezhdunarodnyy kongress po kognitivnoy lingvistike: Sbornik materialov[International Congress on Cognitive Linguistics: Collection of Papers]. - Tambov: Izdatel'skiy dom TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina, 2008. - 822 p. [in Russian]
3. Konstanty. Slovar' russkoy kul'tury [Constants. Dictionary of Russian Culture] / Y.S., Stepanov. - Moscow: Akad. proekt, 2001. - 989 p. [in Russian]
4. Melerovich, A. M. Izomoorfizm mezhdu semantikoy i formoy frazeologicheskoy edinicy i principy postroeniya slovarnyh definiciy [Isomorphism between the semantics and the form of a phraseological unit and the principles of constructing dictionary definitions] / A. M. Melerovich, V. M. Mokienko // Sbornik nauchnyh trudov "Slovo - soznanie - kul'tura" [Collection of scientific works "Word-consciousness-culture"]. - Moscow: "Flinta: Nauka", 2006 - 256 p. [in Russian]
5. Sternin I. A. Tipy znacheniy i concept [Types of meanings and concept] / I. A. Sternin // Sbornik nauchnyh trudov "Konceptual'noe prostranstvo yazyka" [Collection of scientific works "The conceptual space of language"]. - Tambov: Izd-vo TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina, 2005. - P. 257-282. [in Russian]
6. Shevchenko E. M. Gendernye stereotipy vo frazeologicheskoy kartine mira angliyskogo yazyka. [Gender stereotypes in the phraseological picture of the world of the English language] / E. M. Shevchenko, E. S. Danilova // Materialy Chetvertoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii po kognitivnoy frazeologii "Frazeologiya v yazykovoy kartine mira: kognitivno-pragmaticheskie registry" [Proceedings of the Fourth International Scientific Conference on Cognitive Phraseology "Phraseology in the linguistic picture of the world: cognitive-pragmatic registers"]. - Belgorod: "OOO Jepicent", 2019. - P. 176-179. [in Russian]
7. Shevchenko E. M. Precedentnye antroponimy v anglijskom yazyke [Precedent anthroponyms in English] / E. M. Shevchenko, A. M. Shevchenko // Materialy Tret'ey mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii «Innovatika v sovremennom mire: opyt, problemy i perspektivy» [Proceedings of the Third International Scientific and Practical Conference " Innovation in the Modern World: Experience, Problems and Prospects»]. - Ufa: Izd. NIC Vestnik nauki, 2020 - P. 129-134. [in Russian]
8. ABBYY Lingvo CD'12 dictionary: Electronic dictionary / ABBY Software, 2008. - 1 СD-ROM.
9. Collin's Online Dictionary [Electronic resource]. - URL: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/ (accessed: 21.05.2021).
10.Online Etymology Dictionary [Electronic resource]. - URL: http://www.etymonline.com/ (accessed: 23.05.2021).
