CC BY
3
citizens' access to justice serve to increase the level of historical importance. In fact, the adoption of a decree fully meets the requirements of democracy in the country to achieve the independence of the judicial system, justice, protection of rights and legal interests of citizens, reliable judicial work carried out in the direction of strengthening the institution of "reform the reform, but not for people" that has become a living testimony to the idea.
In short, to ensure the independence of the judicial system in the country during the years of independence, the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens, to achieve the liberalization of criminal law and criminal law, justice, judicial supervision of the implementation of the Institute of comprehensive judicial reforms carried out in the true sense of the human rights and interests to provide full service. After all, the main purpose of living in this sacred land reform in every man's dreams come true and the creation of decent living conditions.
References:
1. The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. T.2016.10-p
2. The publication of the newspaper, No. 38 of February 22, 2017
УДК 21:322
Dexqonova S.
teacher of department «History of Uzbekistan» Namangan Engineering Pedagogical Institute
Uzbekistan, Namangan city Muxiddinova X.G. teacher of department «History of Uzbekistan» Namangan Engineering Pedagogical Institute
Uzbekistan, Namangan city RELATIONSHIP AND INTERACTION OF RIGHTS AND MORALS Abstract: This article deals with the relationship between law and morals. Law and morality interact with each other in the process of setting social relations. Their demands largely coincide: that which condemns and encourages law, condemns and encourages, as a rule, morality. Keywords: law, morals, customs, societies, law
СООТНОШЕНИЕ И ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ ПРАВА И МОРАЛИ Аннотация: В этой научной статье рассматривается соотношение права и морали. Право и мораль взаимодействуют между собой в процессе упорядочения общественных отношений. Их требования во многом совпадают: то, что осуждает и поощряет право, осуждает и поощряет, как правило, и мораль.
Ключевые слова: право, мораль, обычаи, общество, закон The most significant regulators of people's behavior have always been: customs; morality; right. As is known, the most ancient rules of the people's command were customs. The custom is closest to instinct, because people are fulfilling it, not thinking why it is needed, it's just "so since the beginning of time".
The custom united and ordered the primitive community of people, but where they did not overcome its dominance, the development of society froze at a dead point, because the customs choked creative imagination, the desire for a new, unusual.
Another system of rules of conduct is morality. The rules of morality arise as spontaneously as customs, but differ from the latter in that they have an ideological basis. A person does not simply mechanically repeat what his ancestors performed before him, but he makes a choice: he must do what the moral dictates him. What is the man guided by, justifying his choice? A conscience that gives rise to a sense of duty. The meaning of a moral duty is that one person recognizes himself in another, sympathizes with the other.
Although morality, like custom, guided people to observe collective interests, collective action, it was an important step forward compared with the custom of becoming an individual in humans as natural beings. Morality is a system of principles of a deeply personal relationship of man to the world in terms of due. Morality is first and foremost a vital landmark in which the person's striving for self-improvement is expressed. Its main function is the affirmation of the human in man. If the mechanical repetition of customs is still close to instinct, then conscience, duty, sense of responsibility inherent in morality, alien to the world of nature, are the anodes of the second nature - human culture.
It is to the extent of the culturological development of society that people gradually begin to form individual needs and interests (economic, political, social, etc.). And in connection with the protection of an individual and his personal interests, a third system of rules of conduct arose-law. The formation of this system is closely connected with the emergence of inequality within the community of people that followed the Neolithic revolution (the transition from the appropriating economy to the producing one).
Thus, the right initially arises to express the claims of people to those or other goods as permission, realized by the individual in order to meet his own needs through forceful influence on other individuals. But this method of protection was not reliable enough. In addition, using force, you can not so much protect your own, how many to assign someone else's rights. This led to a mess that threatened the death of society. Therefore, a new organization has emerged in society that aims to streamline relations between people - the state, and its instrument is law - an act issued by the state and compulsory to execute under pain of physical coercion. The law (and other official sources) enshrined the rights recognized by society (claims to social benefits). Consequently, the law can be characterized as a set of rules of conduct that define the boundaries of freedom and equality of people in the implementation and protection of their interests, which are fixed by the state in official sources and whose enforcement is ensured by the compulsory power of the state.
The unity of the norms of law and morality is based on the commonality of socio-economic interests, the culture of society, the commitment of people to the ideals of freedom and justice.
Unity and the relationship between law and morality is expressed in the fact
that:
- in the system of social norms they are the most universal, extending to the whole society;
- in the norms of morals and morals, a single object of regulation - social relations;
- as well as the norms of morality, the norms of morality come from society;
- the rules of law and morals have a similar structure;
- the norms of law and the norms of morality were separated from the syncretic (merged) customs of the primitive society in the course of its decomposition.
At the same time, the norms of morality and morality differ from each other in the following ways:
The norms of morality are formed in society on the basis of ideas about good and evil, honor, conscience, justice. They acquire mandatory importance as they are recognized and recognized by the majority of members of society. The norms of law established by the state, after the entry into force immediately become mandatory for all persons in the sphere of their action;
The norms of morality are not fixed in special acts. They are contained in the minds of people. In turn, legal norms are expressed in official state acts (laws, decrees, resolutions, etc.);
Norms of law and morality in the vast majority of cases are respected voluntarily on the basis of a natural understanding of the people's fairness of their injunctions. The implementation of these and other norms is ensured by internal conviction, as well as by means of public opinion. Such methods of protection are quite sufficient for moral norms. To ensure the legal norms, state enforcement measures are also applied;
The norms of morality are in the form of the most generalized rules of behavior (be kind, fair, honest, do not envy, etc.). Legal norms are detailed, in comparison with the norms of morality, rules of conduct. They have clearly defined legal rights and duties of participants in public relations;
The norms of morality cover practically all areas of people's relationships, including the legal sphere. Law affects only the most important spheres of public life, regulating only public relations controlled by the state.
Differences between law and morality are the basis for their interaction. They serve one purpose - the coordination of the interests of the individual and society, the maintenance and maintenance of public order. Implementation of legal norms, their implementation is largely determined by how they correspond to the norms of morality. In order for the legal norms to work effectively, they should at least not contradict the moral values of society. In some cases, the right helps to rid society of obsolete moral standards. For example, it was due to the right that the process of overcoming blood feuds - one of the postulates of morality of past times - was going on. At the same time, a number of legal norms (in particular, criminal norms) directly fixes moral norms in the law, backing them with legal sanctions.
