Railway track representation in mathematical model of vehicles movement Текст научной статьи по специальности «Строительство и архитектура»

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вюник Дншропетровського нацюнального унiверситету залiзничного транспорту, 2017, № 6 (72)

ЗАЛ1ЗНИЧНА КОЛ1Я

UDC 625.1.033:539.3

M. B. KURHAN1, D. M. KURHAN2*

'Dep. «Roads Design and Construction», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010, tel +38 (056) 373 15 48, e-mail [email protected], ORCID 0000-0002-8182-7709

2 Dep. «Track and Track Facilities», Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Lazaryan St., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010, tel. +38 (056) 373 15 42, e-mail [email protected], ORCID 0000-0002-9448-5269

RAILWAY TRACK REPRESENTATION IN MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF VEHICLES MOVEMENT

Purpose. The tasks of modeling the interaction of track and rolling stock are basic ones for most areas of modern scientific research of railway transport. The compilation of the model by the principle of Lagrange d'Alembert has found a very wide application for solving the problems of rolling stock dynamics. Representation of the railway track in the model of vehicle movement can be implemented in several ways, which, among other things, will differ in detail. The purpose of this work is to create a methodology for representing the railway track in mathematical models of interaction with rolling stock and obtaining practical results for different characteristics and design of the track and the level of maximum speed. Methodology. The problem consists of determining such track characteristics as the reduced mass, the stiffness coefficient, and the dissipation coefficient. As a tool for solving this problem we used the model of the stress-strain behavior of the railway track based on the joint use of the elastic wave propagation equations to describe the topography of the part of the system that is involved in the interaction at a given time and the equations of dynamic equilibrium of its deformation. This makes it possible to take into account the dynamics of the deflection of the underrail base, which is especially important for the conditions of passenger traffic, which can be carried out at high speed. Findings. The authors obtained theoretically justified stiffness and dissipation coefficients of the railway track for calculating the dynamics of rolling stock in modern models based on systems of equations in accordance with the Lagrange d'Alembert principle. The established values, in contrast to those given in other sources, have a reasonable dependence on the track design and the speed of movement. Originality. The authors expanded the approaches of railroad track representation in models of rolling stock described by systems of equations by the Lagrange-d'Alembert principle. The paper presents the developed method for determining the characteristics of the railway track for such models is based on the results of variant calculations of the dynamic deflection of the rail from the passage of the wheel. Practical value. The authors obtained the values of the stiffness and dissipation coefficients of the railway track depending on the design and speed of motion for practical use in appropriate models of interaction between track and rolling stock.

Key words: railway track; interaction of track and rolling stock; railway track model; track stiffness; track dissipation; dynamic track deflection; passenger traffic

Introduction

The tasks of modeling the interaction of track and rolling stock are the basic ones for most areas of modern scientific railway transport research. Depending on the task being solved, one can use both relatively simple, sometimes even flat calculation schemes and the developed models de-

scribed by systems with dozens of equations. Despite the fact that it is always being modeled the interaction process between track and rolling stock, the tasks of rolling stock research and those aimed at the railway track research have fundamental differences.

Today one can not recommend a single mathematical model and, even, a single modeling

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вюник Дншропетровського нацюнального унiверситету залiзничного транспорту, 2017, № 6 (72)

principle to solve the entire variety of tasks of interaction between the track and rolling stock. It is the problem definition should determine the permissible hypotheses and assumptions, obligatory factors of influence, possible accuracy of the output data and sufficient accuracy of the obtained results and other characteristics determining the choice of the adequate for this case model.

It is rather difficult to obtain satisfactory results trying to combine simulation of rolling stock and railway track operation. Therefore, the most commonly used are not general models, but a staged modeling of processes in several different models. Thus, in the models of rolling stock with detailed accounting of dynamic processes in a vehicle and maximal simplification of rail track, the forces acting on the track are obtained. Further, such forces become the initial load (usually a simplified one to the static application of these forces) in models with detalization of rail track operation. This approach to the consistent application of two fundamentally different models is becoming increasingly widespread today.

Models of rolling stock are, in most cases, systems of motion (oscillations) of a set of interconnected solids. Usually, for the mathematical description of such models, the systems of differential equations of the second kind, compiled according to Lagrange-d'Alamber principle are used [1, 2].

As a rule, it is taken a constant mass of interacting bodies, linearity of the connections between them, constant speed of motion, immutability of geometry of the bodies themselves (the deformations of system are determined by the change in position of bodies, not by their own deformation), the invariance of the physical (especially the elastic ones) characteristics of bodies and so on. Attempts to eliminate such assumptions considerably complicate solution of the equation system, and in most cases, it makes impossible to obtain the solution with the necessary accuracy at all.

Particular attention should be paid to the fact that the system of bodies, described by the Lagrange equations of the second kind may have a local or global coordinate system. From the point of view of mathematical tools, this does not have a fundamental difference, but it has significant disadvantages for practical application. The local coordinate system assumes that its center moves together with the system, as a rule it is located in the center of the weight of the largest body, for

example, the car body. Then the coordinates of all bodies at each step of calculation are moves relative to this point. At each step of calculation, they have values about one order, both between themselves and between values at other steps. This approach provides a certain accuracy of results of solving the equation system at each step in each direction. However, with this approach, a vehicle under study does not move along the track, but only fluctuates in one place. Local track inequalities are set in the same local coordinate system, and the global change in the motion trajectory is taken into account as application of the corresponding external forces. Thus, for example, the motion in a curve is set by applying to the bodies of the corresponding centrifugal force.

Global coordinate system establishes a permanent point of its center, the position of which does not change during the entire sequence of calculations. It simplifies the mechanism for describing the track position and makes it possible to set its spatial position as an array of coordinates. The advantages of this approach are, first, the ability to set any layout of the track, including the results of outdoor shooting; and secondly, the forces arising from changing the motion trajectory will be calculated as a consequence, not set as the source data. However, all displacements of individual bodies of car will also be determined relative to the originally set coordinate center. This will increase the calculation error.

Consequently, for the tasks in which it is the rolling stock dynamics that is under study, the local coordinate system is used - this is a more common variant. In some cases, when it is important to study the motion dynamics, depending exactly on the track geometry the global coordinate system is used.

Modeling according to the principle of La-grange-d'Alamber has found a very broad application for solving the tasks of rolling stock dynamics. In accordance with the principles of solid state mechanics it is assumed that the object has a constant mass. The force applied to the object point instantly leads to displacement of all its other points and the body moves as one whole relative to the mass center. The use of such an approach for modeling the operation of a railway track construction may take place, but for the most tasks it should be considered inappropriate. One can divide a railway track into integral objects with a constant mass on© M. B. Kurhan, D. M. Kurhan, 2017

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вюник Дншропетровського нацюнального унiверситету залiзничного транспорту, 2017, N° 6 (72)

ly conditionally. Moreover, these masses will have small displacement values, which will occur in a short period of time.

Purpose

The work is aimed to create a methodology for representing a rail track in mathematical models of interaction with rolling stock and obtain practical results for various characteristics and track design and the maximum speed level.

Methodology

Rail track representation in the model of vehicle movement can be carried out in several ways, which, first of all, will differ in different detaliza-tion.

One of the variants involves description of rail track as an endless beam, which lies on an elastic, non-inertial basis - the Winkler model. This model is the basis of many static calculation schemes and is adequate for many tasks. But such a system will have an infinite number of freedom degrees, which is inconvenient for inclusion in rolling stock models. An alternative is the Vlasov model, which makes it possible to express displacement of the beam (rail) points and underrail base through displacement of the contact points of wheels and rails.

In this case, the general approach is maintained: a system assembly of separate rigid bodies with mass and connections between them. In the simplest form it can be a tight connection of wheel with a rail track, Fig. 1, a. Then the stiffness of such a bearing reduced to one wheel can be determined by the formula

k =

2U

(1)

where U - is an elasticity modulus of underrail base; k -relative stiffness coefficient.

This variant is rarely used. The absence of a dissipative connection makes the system too sensitive to the swing: the accumulation of errors in the solution of equations can lead to continuous oscillations.

In most cases, it is used the variant where each wheel has a rigidly dissipative connection with the reduced part of the rail track - Fig. 1, b.

Today, it is spreading the tendency to take into account the track inertia, that is, a track (or its individual elements) should have a mass, which

doi 10.15802/stp2017/118380

makes it an integral object of the mass oscillation system and makes it possible to detalize for separate components. The weight implies the so-called «reduced mass» - that is, the one interacting with the wheel. Sometimes it means the mass of rail, sometimes - the mass of the track upper structure (again, reduced to one wheel). It is clear that in any case this mass is conditional, its value should change in the process of interaction, but systems based on the Lagrange-d'Alamber princile make it impossible to use variable masses. In addition, the railway track operates in the conditions of elastic deformations that can not be fully identified by the displacement of mass centers of rigid bodies.

Depending on the detalization degree of subsystem «rail track», the following variants are possible:

- the reduced mass of rail is taken into account; it is assumed that the rail and the wheel, as an object with their total mass, have a rigidly dissi-pative connection with underrail base, Fig. 1, c;

- it is taken into account the reduced mass of rail, which has a rigidly dissipative connection with underrail base; to separate the wheel mass from the rail between them a rigid connection, (with a large numerical value) is established, Fig. 1, d;

- it is taken into account the reduced mass of the track is taken into account, which has a rigidly dissipative connection with the base, Fig. 1, e;

- it is taken into account the weight of sleeper (interacting with the wheel), which has a rigidly dissipative connection with under sleeper base on the one side and with a rail on the other (as a rule, unimportant one (Fig. 1, f), although there may be the variants of rail mass separation too (Fig. 1, g);

- it is taken into account the weight of sleeper (interacting with the wheel), which has a rigidly dissipative connection with the rail on the one side and with ballast on the other, which has a rigid connection with sub-ballast base (Fig. 1, f).

The given classification is developed on the basis of works [1, 2, 6, 7, 9-11], and others.

From the point of view of vehicle movement modeling the variants from "f" (see Fig. 1) and further are not specify the calculation results as they complicate the general system of equations and can be identically referred to the variant "e" or even simpler ones. Such detalization takes place when trying to simulate the railroad operation itself.

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вюник Днiпропетровського нацiонального ушверситету залiзничного транспорту, 2017, № 6 (72)

2У

/^f//////////7/77/ >---

777777777777777/

£—2

ч! I

I

N//////////7/7/7/

'©—©

3

1

3

Т

/

V0-О

_| Ld

'О—©

i

£

:©—©

N

% +

///////////z/7////

3

15

'Ш

777777777777777

Fig. 1. Options for rail track representation in the model based on the Lagrange-d'Alamber equation system: 1 - wheel; 2 - rail; 3 - underrail base; 4 - conditional object with a weight of a track, reduced to one wheel; 5 - immovable foundation; 6 - sleeper; 7 - under sleeper base; 8 - sub-ballast base

Thus, the task of presenting a rail track in models of rolling stock is reduced to determining characteristics of connections between its elements and the wheel. They can be obtained either by purely analytical approaches, or according to the results of dependences of the track deflections on the applied load. The latter variant can be implemented either experimentally according to the results of field measurements, or theoretically based on the results of variant calculations using corresponding models of the stress-strain behavior of the rail track. A similar problem was solved by

Prof. O. M. Darenskyi in the work [3]. This work based on analytical calculations determines the support rigidity reduced to one wheel, for the zone of rail joints in the conditions of industrial transport operation.

In order to solve such problem for mainline transport, especially for the conditions of passenger traffic, which can occur at high speed [4], one of the important characteristics of the rail track model which can be applied is the ability to take into account the dynamics of the underrail base deflection.

b

a

c

2

3

e

1

2

h

g

2

6

6

7

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вюник Дншропетровського нацюнального унiверситету залiзничного транспорту, 2017, № 6 (72)

Thus, the task consists of determining such characteristics of the track as the reduced mass, rigidity coefficient, and dissipation coefficient. To solve the task let us consider the following calculation scheme, Fig. 2.

Differential equation for describing fluctuations of such system will have the following form

d2 z n dz , x

m —- + b — + Kz = P (t) •

1 dt2

dt

(2)

If one integrates along the length of the covered distance, then

tz2 d 2z

mtV —-

1 7.2

dz

+ ßf Vd- + kz = P ( x ), dt2 ßt dt 1 V '

(3)

where V - is the movement speed.

The equations (3) are reduced to the classical form

d2 - „ d- 2 P ( x ) —- + 2r — + ш2- = v ' dx dx H

(4)

where r = -

ß,

Fig. 2. Calculation scheme of track operation reduced to one wheel

Operation of the track reduced to one wheel is considered as a system with one freedom degree consisting of mass that has a rigid (K ) and dissi-pative (b) connection with the base. An external force (P) variable in time is applied to the system. Such calculation scheme is identical to the rail track representation in the Lagrange-d'Alamber models shown in the Fig. 1, e, but, if necessary, it can be reduced to the other variants.

2mV

-; œ =

H = mtV2.

mV

The force will be presented using the expression

P (x) = Ae k ( cos kx + sin kx),

(5)

where A - is the parameter determining the force amplitude.

Then solution of the equation (4) will have following form:

:( x) = Ce r ( cos шх + sin шх) +

^(ш2 + 2kt2 - 4r£t )cosktx + (ш2 - 2kt2)sinkxx

-kx

mtV 2

ш4 - 4rktш2 + 4kt4 + 8r 2kt2 - 8rkt3

(6)

f

where С = -

mtV 2

2U

ш'

+ 2kt - 4rkt

ш4 - 4rkш2

-4kt4 + 8r 2kt2 -

8rk

t /

Let's assume that the wheel covers the distance from one axle between sleepers to the other, Fig. 3, and then the process is cyclically repeated. This approach corresponds both to the models in which the vehicle (wheel) movement along the track is conditional (wheel position relative to the track does not change in the local coordinate system, and movement relative to the track is taken into account by applying the corresponding external forces (accelerations, constraints), and the models in which movement along the track is set in explicit form, taking into account the wheel position along the track length.

I

l/2 l/2

x

Fig. 3. Sample limits for deflection dependence on the strength

z

l

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вюник Дншропетровського нацюнального унiверситету залiзничного транспорту, 2017, № 6 (72)

As a tool for solving such a problem it was used a model of stress-strain behavior of the rail track based on combination of equations of elastic wave propagation to describe the geometry of the outline of the part of the system space that is involved in the interaction at a given time and the equations of dynamic equilibrium of its deformation [5].

Findings

According to simulation results of the dynamic deflection of the rail, one can establish its dependence on the applied force. As noted above, this dependence will be determined in the area

0 ± l/,

where l - is the distance between

the sleeper axes. Example of the obtained deflections when the support is load-unloaded by a wheel for the area with elasticity modulus of underrail base of 32 MPa is shown in the Fig. 4

Fig. 4. Deflection of rail track according to modeling:

1 - statics; 2 - 80 km/h; 3 - 160 km/h; 4 - 240

Formula (6) shows the analytic dependence of the deflection on the force. Thus, the track characteristics can be determined as a result of approximating the data array of deflections obtained by modeling (Zm) by function (6). Approximation algorithm according to criterion of the least squares:

z = f (kt, ßt, mx, P); Zm = {zm,) = f (P)}; R = £(zm,} - z) ;

i

3kt e ( kt(min); kt(max) ) , 3ßt e [ 0;ßt(max) ), ^mt e [0; mt(max) ) : R ^ kt ^ kt(min) ; kt ^ kt(max) ; ßt ^ ßt(max) ; mt ^ t(max) *

min;

The calculation results are summarized in the Table 1. They make it possible on reasonable grounds to set the rail track characteristics for the rolling stock modeling according to Lagrange-d'Amberm principle. Analysis of results showed that application of reduced mass of track objects in such models is appropriate in cases when there is no complete deflection of the rail occurring at a sufficiently high speed [8], or in cases of simulation of stress-strain state of directly separate elements of the rail track.

Originality and Practical Value

Theoretically proved stiffness and dissipation coefficients of the rail track for calculations of rolling stock dynamics in modern models based on the Lagrange-d'Alamber equation systems are obtained. The established values as opposed to those given in other sources have a substantiated dependence on the track structure and movement speed.

(7)

Table 1

Characteristics of railway track as a support when interacting with a wheel

U, MPa Indicator Movement speed, km/h

80 120 160 200 240 280

21 к, MN/m 47.4 48.2 49.5 51.2 53.2 55.3

ßt, kN s/m 100 70 60 40 40 40

32 kt, MN/m 62.6 63.1 63.9 65.0 66.2 67.7

ßt, kN s/m 130 80 70 60 50 50

57 kt, MN/m 97.2 97.9 98.6 99.4 100.4 101.8

ßt, kN s/m 210 160 110 90 80 70

X

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вюник Дншропетровського нацюнального унiверситету залiзничного транспорту, 2017, N° 6 (72)

Conclusions

The stiffness and dissipation coefficients of the rail track as a support reduced to interaction with the wheel in the models of vehicle movement are determined not only by the elasticity of the under-rail base layers, but also have a direct and inverse dependence on the movement speed, respectively.

The approaches of rail track representation in the rolling stock models, described by the equation systems based on the Lagrange-d'Alamber principle are expanded. The value of rigidity and dissipation coefficients of the railway track depending on its design and speed are obtained.

LIST OF REFERENCE LINKS

1. Вершинский, С. В. Динамика вагона / С. В. Вершинский, В. Н. Данилов, И. И. Челноков. - Москва : Транспорт, 1972. - 304 с.

2. Даншенко, Е. I. Залiзнична колш : щдруч. для вищ. навч. закл. : у 2 т. / Е. I. Даншенко. - Ки!в : 1нпрес, 2010. - Т. 2. - 456 с.

3. Даренский, А. Н. Моделирование взаимодействия пути и подвижного состава при дискретном подрельсовом основании в зоне рельсовых стыков / А. Н. Даренский, А. В. Клименко // 1нформ.-керуючi системи на залiзн. трансп. - 2012. - № 4 (101). - С. 15-22.

4. Курган, М. Пвдготовка коли для тдвищення швидкосп руху погдав / М. Курган, Д. Курган, Н. Хме-левська // Укр. залiзницi. - 2017. - № 9/10. - С. 14-21.

5. Курган, М. Б. Теоретичш основи впровадження високошвидшсного руху по1здв в Укрш'ш : монографiя / М. Б. Курган, Д. М. Курган ; Дшпропетр. нац. ун-т залiзн. трансп. iм. акад. В. Лазаряна. - Дшпро : ДНУЗТ, 2016. - 283 с.

6. Connolly, D. P. Use of Conventional Site Investigation Parameters to Calculate Critical Velocity of Trains from Rayleigh Waves / D. P. Connolly, M. C. Forde //Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. - 2015. - Vol. 2476. - Р. 32-36. doi: 10.3141/2476-05.

7. Kouroussis, G. A combined numerical/experimental prediction method for urban railway vibration / G. Kouroussis, K. E. Vogiatzis, D. P. Connolly //Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. - 2017. -Vol. 97. - Р. 377-386. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.030.

8. Kurhan, D. M. Features of perception of loading elements of the railway track at high speeds of the movement / D. M. Kurhan // Наука та прогрес транспорту. - 2015. - № 2 (56). - С. 136-145. doi: 10.15802/stp20-15/42172.

9. Meli, E. An innovative wheel-rail contact model for railway vehicles under degraded adhesion conditions / E. Meli, A. Ridolfi //Multibody System Dynamics. - 2015. - Vol. 33. - Iss. 3. - Р. 285-313. doi: 10.1007/s 11044-013-9405-4.

10. Railway construction / Sz. Fisher, B. Eller, Z. Kada, A. Nemeth. - Gyor : Universitas-Gyor Nonprofit Kft.,

2015. - 334 p.

11. Study of ground vibrations induced by railway traffic in a 3D FEM model formulated in the time domain: experimental validation / J. F. Ruiz, P. A. Costa, R. Calgada [et al.] // Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. -

2016. - Vol. 13. - Iss. 5. - Р. 652-664. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2016.11-72649.

М. Б. КУРГАН1, Д. М. КУРГАН2*

'Каф. «Проектування i будшництво дорт>, Дтпропетровський нацюнальний ушверситет затзничного транспорту iменi академжа В. Лазаряна, вул. Лазаряна, 2, Дшпро, Украша, 49010, тел. +38 (056) 373 15 48, ел. пошта [email protected], ORCID 0000-0002-8182-7709

2 Каф. «Колш та колшне господарство», Дтпропетровський нацюнальний ушверситет залiзничного транспорту iменi академжа В. Лазаряна, вул. Лазаряна, 2, Дншро, Украша, 49010, тел. +38 (056) 373 15 42, ел. пошта [email protected], ORCID 0000-0002-9448-5269

ПРЕДСТАВЛЕННЯ ЗАЛ1ЗНИЧНО1 КОЛИ В МАТЕМАТИЧН1Й МОДЕЛ1 РУХУ ЕК1ПАЖ1В

Мета. Задачi моделювання взаемодп коли та рухомого складу е базовими для бшьшосп напрямшв су-часних наукових дослщжень залiзничного транспорту. Складання моделi за принципом Лагранжа-

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вюник Дншропетровського нацюнального унiверситету залiзничного транспорту, 2017, N° 6 (72)

д'Аламбера знайшло широке застосування для вирiшення задач динамiки рухомого складу. Представления залХзничнох коли у моделi руху ек1паж1в може здшснюватися дек1лькома способами, як1, серед шшого, бу-дуть вiдрiзнятися рiзною деталiзацiю. Метою дано! роботи е створення методики представления залХзничнох коли у математичних моделях взаемоди з рухомим складом та отримання практичних результата для рiзних характеристик i конструкцш коли на рiвнi максимально1 швидкостг Методика. Задача дослХдження склада-еться з визначення таких характеристик коли: приведена маса, коефiцiент жорсткостi, коефщент дисипаци. Як iнструмент для хх розв'язання була застосована модель напружено-деформованого стану залХзничнох коли, основана на поеднанш рiвнянь поширення пружнох хвилi для опису геометри обрису частини простору системи, що залучена до взаемоди на даний момент часу, та рiвнянь динамХчнох рiвноваги хх деформаци. Це дае можливХсть урахування динамiки прогину тдрейковох основи, що особливо важливо для умов пасажир-ського руху, який може вщбуватися з високою швидк1стю. Результати. Отримаш теоретично обгрунтованi коефiцiенти жорсткосп та дисипаци залХзничнох коли для розрахункхв динамiки рухомого складу в сучасних моделях на основi систем рiвнянь, складених за принципом Лагранжа-д'Аламбера. Встановлеш значення, на вiдмiну вщ наведених в iнших джерелах, мають обгрунтовану залежнiсть, що поеднуе конструкцп коли та швидкостi руху. Наукова новизна. Розширеш пiдходи представлення залХзничнох коли у моделях рухомого складу, описаних системами рiвнянь за принципом Лагранжа-д'Аламбера. Розроблена методика визначення характеристик залХзничнох коли для таких моделей за результатами варiантних розрахункхв динамiчного прогину рейки вщ проходження колеса. Практична значимкть. Авторами отриманi значення коефщенпв жорсткосп й дисипаци залХзничнох коли залежно вХд хх конструкци та швидкосп руху для практичного застосування у вХдповХдних моделях взаемоди коли X рухомого складу.

Ключовi слова: залХзнична колХя; взаемодХя коли та рухомого складу; модель залХзничнох коли; жорст-кхсть коли; дисипащя коли; динамХчний прогин коли; пасажирський рух

Н. Б. КУРГАН1, Д. Н. КУРГАН2*

'Каф. «Проектирование и строительство дорог», Днепропетровский национальный университет железнодорожного транспорта имени академика В. Лазаряна, ул. Лазаряна, 2, Днипро, Украина, 49010, тел. +38 (056) 373 15 48, эл. почта [email protected], ОЯСГО 0000-0002-8182-7709

2 Каф. «Путь и путевое хозяйство», Днепропетровский национальный университет железнодорожного транспорта имени академика В. Лазаряна, ул. Лазаряна, 2, Днипро, Украина, 49010, тел. +38 (056) 373 15 42, эл. почта [email protected], ORCID 0000-0002-9448-5269

ПРЕДСТАВЛЕНИЕ ЖЕЛЕЗНОДОРОЖНОГО ПУТИ В МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКОЙ МОДЕЛИ ДВИЖЕНИЯ ЭКИПАЖЕЙ

Цель. Задачи моделирования взаимодействия пути и подвижного состава являются базовыми для большинства направлений современных научных исследований железнодорожного транспорта. Составление модели по принципу Лагранжа-д'Аламбера нашло широкое применение для решения задач динамики подвижного состава. Представление железнодорожного пути в модели движения экипажей может осуществляться несколькими способами, которые, среди прочего, будут отличаться детализацией. Целью данной работы является создание методики представления железнодорожного пути в математических моделях взаимодействия с подвижным составом и получение практических результатов для разных характеристик, конструкций пути на уровне максимальной скорости. Методика. Задача исследования состоит из определения таких характеристик пути: приведенная масса, коэффициент жесткости и коэффициент диссипации. В качестве инструмента для ее решения была использована модель напряженно-деформированного состояния железнодорожного пути, основанная на совместном использовании уравнений распространения упругих волн для описания геометрии очертания части пространства системы, которая задействована во взаимодействии на данный момент времени, и уравнений динамического равновесия ее деформации. Это дает возможность учесть динамику прогиба подрельсового основания, что особенно важно для условий пассажирского движения, которое может осуществляться с высокой скоростью. Результаты. Получены теоретически обоснованные коэффициенты жесткости и диссипации железнодорожного пути для расчетов динамики подвижного состава в современных моделях на основе систем уравнений, составленных по принципу Лагранжа-д'Аламбера. Установленные значения, в отличие от приведенных в других источниках, имеют обоснованную зависимость, которая объединяет конструкции пути и скорости движения. Научная новизна. Расшире-

Наука та прогрес транспорту. Вюник Дншропетровського нащонального унiверситету залiзничного транспорту, 2017, № 6 (72)

ны подходы представления железнодорожного пути в моделях подвижного состава, описанных системами уравнений по принципу Лагранжа-д'Аламбера. Разработана методика определения характеристик железнодорожного пути для таких моделей по результатам вариантных расчетов динамического прогиба рельса от прохождения колеса. Практическая значимость. Авторами получены значения коэффициентов жесткости и диссипации железнодорожного пути в зависимости от конструкции и скорости движения для практического использования в соответствующих моделях взаимодействия пути и подвижного состава.

Ключевые слова: железнодорожный путь; взаимодействия пути и подвижного состава; модель железнодорожного пути; жесткость пути; диссипация пути; динамический прогиб пути; пассажирское движение

REFERENCES

1. Vershinskiy, S. V., Danilov, V. N., & Chelnokov, I. I. (1972). Dinamika vagona. Moscow: Transport. (in Russian)

2. Danilenko, E. I. (2010). Zaliznychna koliia [Textbook] (Vol. 2). Kyiv: Inpres. (in Ukrainian)

3. Darenskiy, A. N., & Klimenko, A. V. (2012). Modelirovaniye vzaimodeystviya puti i podvizhnogo sostava pri diskretnom podrelsovom osnovanii v zone relsovykh stykov. Informacijno-kerujuchi systemy na zaliznychno-mu transporti, 4(101), 15-22. (in Russian)

4. Kurhan, M., Kurhan, D., & Khmelevska, N. (2017). Pidhotovka kolii dlia pidvyshchennia shvydkosti rukhu poizdiv. Ukrainska zaliznytsia, 9-10(51-52), 14-21. (in Ukrainian)

5. Kurhan, M. B., & Kurhan, D. M. (2016). Teoretychni osnovy vprovadzhennia vysokoshvydkisnoho rukhu poizdiv v Ukraini [Monograph]. Dnipro: Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan. (in Ukrainian)

6. Connolly, D. P., & Forde, M. C. (2015). Use of Conventional Site Investigation Parameters to Calculate Critical Velocity of Trains from Rayleigh Waves. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2476, 32-36. doi: 10.3141/2476-05. (in English)

7. Kouroussis, G., Vogiatzis, K. E., & Connolly, D. P. (2017). A combined numerical/experimental prediction method for urban railway vibration. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 97, 377-386. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.030. (in English)

8. Kurhan, D. M. (2015). Features of perception of loading elements of the railway track at high speeds of the movement. Science and Transport Progress, 2(56), 136-145. doi: 10.15802/stp20-15/42172. (in English)

9. Meli, E., & Ridolfi, A. (2015). An innovative wheel-rail contact model for railway vehicles under degraded adhesion conditions. Multibody System Dynamics, 33(3), 285-313. doi: 10.1007/s11044-013-9405-4. (in English)

10. Fisher, S., Eller, B., Kada, Z., & Németh, A. (2015). Railway Construction. Gyor: Universitas-Gyor Nonprofit Kft. (in English)

11. Fernández Ruiz, J., Costa, P. A., Calgada, R., Medina Rodríguez, L., & Colago, A. (2016). Study of ground vibrations induced by railway traffic in a 3D FEM model formulated in the time domain: experimental validation. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(5), 652-664. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2016.1172649. (in English)

Prof. O. L. Tiutkin, Dr. Sc. (Tech.) (Ukraine); Prof. O. M. Darenskyi, Dr. Sc. (Tech.) (Ukraine) recommended this article to be published

Received: June 06, 2017

Accessed: September 12, 2017