CC BY
79
RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries 2018 Vol. 13 No. 3 224—231
Вестник РУДН. Серия: АГРОНОМИЯ И ЖИВОТНОВОДСТВО http://journals.rudn.ru/agronomy
DOI: 10.22363/2312-797X-2018-13-3-224-231 УДК 633.15:631.445.4
OPTIMIZATION OF INNOVATIVE STRIP-TILL TECHNOLOGY OF MAIZE CULTIVATION FOR GRAIN ON BLACK SOILS IN STEPPE ZONE OF VOLGOGRAD REGION
V.M. Ivanov, A.V. Kubareva
Volgograd State Agricultural University
Universitetskiy pr, 26, Volgograd, 400002, Russian Federation
Abstract. Studies carried out in steppe zone of chernozem soils of Volgograd region have established that winter wheat after fallow and maize are the best precursors for maize, cultivated for grain under strip-till technology. Growing maize after sunflower annually led to a significant decrease in crop yields. N66P32K32 turned to be the best rate of mineral fertilizers. Seeding rate of 60 thousand seeds per ha was optimal for early maize hybrids. It was found that total water consumption over the three-year period was 2653 m3/ha with fertilizer rate N66P32K32, and corn and sunflower rose to 2,700 and 2,695 m3/ha. At N66P32K32, winter wheat plants used moisture most economically. The water consumption coefficient, which shows moisture consumption for creation of a ton of produce, was 421.0 m3/t. For corn, it increased by 34.1, and for sunflower by 247.7 m3/t. In control after all precursors, moisture consumption per ton of grain sharply increased: according to winter wheat, water consumption coefficient was equal to 551.9 m3/t, corn and sunflower were 53.0 and 360.1 m3/t more. The maximum values of dry matter accumulation in 2013 and 2015 were recorded at flowering stage: depending on precursor, after winter wheat — 9.07 and 7.24 t/ha, after maize — 8.67 and 6.77, and after sunflower — 6.64 and 4.76 t/ha, respectively. Over the research years the largest daily increasing of dry biomass during germination-flowering was observed after winter wheat — 452 and 361 kg/ha, decreased slightly after corn — 432 and 337 kg/ha, and a significant decrease was noted after sunflower — 331 and 237 kg/ha. In arid 2014 season, during the period of precipitation deficit, the indicators were significantly lower. The best yield results were obtained in more favorable 2013 and 2015 research years. The studies showed that the best maize precursor was winter wheat — 5.524 t/ha. The lowest yield was obtained after sunflower — 3,456 t/ha. Moreover, maximum yield was achieved at fertilizer application N66P32K32 — 5.324 t/ha, N50P16K16 — 4.813 t/ha and in the control — 4.015 t/ha.
Keywords: maize for grain, mineral fertilizers, seeding rate, precursor, strip-till, yield
INTRODUCTION
It is important to preserve and enhance natural fertility of soil based on development and introduction of new technologies. It is essential to achieve a sharp reduction in material and energy costs [1]. A promising method is the innovative strip-till system, which allows increasing grain production, increasing yield, saving fuel, since entire soil surface of field is not processed [2—4]. The peculiarity of strip-till technology is that soil is treated with strips, while in intermediate regions the soil remains unplowed, and natural structure remains intact as in direct sowing [5—7]. Strip-till technology also contributes to better warming of soil and better contact of seeds with it [8]. Intensive cultivation of maize for grain allows for higher yields 2.4 times under unfavorable conditions and 2.1 times — in good weather conditions in comparison with the control [9, 10].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research was carried out on Krasnokorotkovsky experimental field in Novo-anninskiy district of the Volgograd region in 2013—2015 to develop elements of the innovative strip-till technology. A three-factorial experiment was laid by the split plot method. Factor A was precursors — winter wheat after black fallow, maize for grain, sunflower; factor B — rates of mineral fertilizers — control (without fertilizers), N50P16K16 (N16P16K16 — for the main application + N34 for fertilizing, N66P32K32 (N32P32K32 + N34 for fertilizing) and factor C — seeding rates: 50, 60 and 70 thousand of seeds per ha. The registration area of third-grade plot was 182 m2. The soil in the experiment is southern chernozem with a humus content of 4.7%, pH 8, total nitrogen — 84.7 mg/kg (very low), mobile phosphorus — 43.4 mg/kg (increased), exchange potassium 395.0 mg/kg (increased). Early hybrid 'NK Gitago' (FAO 200) was used.
In autumn systemic herbicide Rap was used, 36% water solution (A) at a dose of 4 l/ha with a working fluid consumption of 50 l/ha. The strips were cut in October by Ortman cultivator with a depth of 23—25 cm and a width of 25 cm with simultaneous application of main fertilizer in liquid form. The sowing was carried out by 6-row Monosem seed drill to 6...7 cm depth. In 2013 sowing was carried out on April 22, in 2014 — May 5 and in 2015 — on May 26. Herbicide Ballerina, 41.7% suspension emulsion was applied at 0.4 l/ha with a working fluid consumption of 200 l/ha for crop protection in the phase of 3—5 leaves, and Vetter cultivator was used to carry out N34 ammonium nitrate fertilizing in variants N16P16K16 u N32P32K32. In 2014 pests population (stem moth, cotton scoop) reached Economic Threshold Limit (ETL), and therefore, Karate Zeon insecticide was used for their destruction, at a dose of 0.2 l/ha. Harvesting was carried out by Akros-530 combine harvester with corn mower Orosh.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The weather conditions were different. Amount of precipitation was 199 mm during sowing-full ripeness period in 2013, 127 mm in 2014 and 235 mm in 2015. The average humidity was 30% in 2013, 27% in 2014 and 31% in 2015, and the average daily air temperature was 23.0 °C, 27.1 °C and 23.7 °C, respectively. The hydrothermal coefficient was 0.75 in 2013 and this period was estimated as dry, in 2014 — 0.42 (very arid), and in 2015 — 0.92 (arid).
Field maize germination was high and averaged for 3 years 91.4% after winter wheat, 91.0% after maize and 89.9% after sunflower. Total survival reached 87.4%, 85.3% and 83.5%, respectively.
Maize vegetative period in 2013 and 2015 in fertilized variant N66P32K32 after winter wheat and maize lasted 100 days, and after sunflower — 98 days. In the control, it decreased by one day according to experiment variants. In arid 2014 vegetative period was 2 days shorter: in the first fertilizer variant it was 98, 98, 96 days, and in the second — 97, 97 and 95 days.
The total water consumption over three-year period at N66P32K32 fertilization after winter wheat was 2653 m3/ha, after maize and sunflower it increased to 2700 and 2695 m3/ha, respectively (Table 1). Moisture was used most economically at N66P32K32
fertilization after winter wheat. The water consumption coefficient was 421.0 m3/t. After maize and sunflower it increased by 34.1 and 247.7 m3/t, respectively. In control variant after all precursors moisture consumption per ton of grain sharply increased: after winter wheat water consumption coefficient was 551.9 m3/t, after maize and sunflower it was 53.0 and 360.1 m3/t more.
Table 1
Total water consumption of maize for grain depending on precursor and fertilizer application at seeding rate 60 thousand of seeds per ha (average for 2013—2015), mi/ha
Indicators Precursor
Winter wheat Maize Sunflower
untreated N66P32K32 untreated N66P32K32 untreated N66P32K32
Available moisture in 0—1,0 m (sowing), mi/ha 1 605 1 604 1 577 1 577 1 530 1 529
Precipitation during growing season, mm 187 187 187 187 187 187
Precipitation used, C = 0.7, mm 130.9 130.9 130.9 130.9 130.9 130.9
Available moisture in 0—1,0 m (before harvesting), mi/ha 252 260 178 186 134 143
Total water consumption, mi/ha 2 662 2 653 2 708 2 700 2 705 2 695
Precipitation in total water consumption, % 49.2 49.3 48.3 48.5 48.4 48.6
Soil moisture in total water consumption, % 50.8 50.7 51.7 51.5 51.6 51.4
Average daily water consumption, mi/ha 26.9 26.7 27.6 27.2 28.1 27.7
Yield, t/ha 4.823 6.302 4.477 5.933 2.966 4.030
Coefficient of water consumption, mi/t 551.9 421.0 604.9 455.1 912.0 668.7
The amount of grain per 1 mm of productive moisture, kg 18.1 23.8 16.5 21.9 10.9 14.9
The least amount of grain per mm of productive moisture (10.9 kg) was formed after sunflower at zero fertilizer application, and the largest (23.8 kg) — after winter wheat at N66P32K32 fertilization.
Most leaves were formed during heading stage, and winter wheat, maize and sunflower leaf mass averaged 35.07, 33.81 and 27.20 thousand m2/hectare. In terms of mineral nutrition, control was the least responsive, and amounted 29.30 thousand m2/ha, at N50P16K16 and N66P32K32 this indicator reached 32.36 and 35.67 thousand m2/ha. Increase in seeding rate resulted in increasing leaf area: for 50 thousand seeds/ha it was 30.74 thousand m2/ha, for 60 thousand seeds/ha — 31.89 and for 70 thousand seeds/ha — 33.45 thousand m2/ha.
Accumulation of dry matter in 2013 and 2015 had maximum values at flowering phase: after winter wheat — 9.07 and 7.24 t/ha, maize — 8.67 and 6.77 t/ha, and sunflower — 6.64 and 4.76 t/ha. The greatest average daily increase in dry biomass during seedlings — flowering was observed after winter wheat — 452 and 361 kg/ha, it decreased slightly after maize — 432 and 337 t/ha, and a significant decrease was
recorded after sunflower — 331 and 237 kg/ha in 2013 and 2015, respectively. In dry 2014 these indicators were significantly lower. Accumulation of dry biomass was the best at N66P32K32 fertilizing: in 2013 — 9.30 t/ha, in 2014 and 2015 — less by 3.55 and 2.54 t/ha. Average daily growth for 2013, 2014 and 2015 was as follows: 463, 286 and 337 kg/ha, respectively. According to the factor C, on average, over the years of study, Accumulation of dry matter at seed rates 50,000, 60,000 and 70,000 seeds/ha was 6.37, 6.60 and 6.61 t/ha. The average daily increase in the factor of seed rate was slightly lower at 50,000 seeds/ha — 317 kg/ha, and at 60,000 and 70,000 seeds/ha — 329 kg/ha. In full ripeness weight of maize dry matter after winter wheat reached 6.03 and 4.87 t/ha, after maize — 5.77 and 4.51 t/ha, after sunflower — 4.42 and 3.16 t/ha. Accumulation of dry biomass in 2014 was 4.35 t/ha after winter wheat, and after maize and sunflower it decreased by 0.35 and 2.33 t/ha.
Average daily growth of dry biomass for three-year data in flowering — full ripeness period after winter wheat was 319 kg/ha, after maize — 300 kg/ha and after sunflower — 206 kg/ha. Application of mineral fertilizers contributed to an increase in dry matter accumulation. So, at N50P16K16 for research years it was 4.46 t/ha, at N66P32K32 — 4.84 t/ha, and at zero fertilizing — only 3.86 t/ha have accumulated. The average daily growth of dry biomass was: without fertilizer — 240 kg/ha, at N50P16K16 — 281 kg/ha, at N66P32K32 — 304 kg/ha. Accumulation of dry biomass at seed rate of 50, 60 and 70 thousand seeds/ha was 4.24, 4.39 and 4.42 t/ha. The average daily plant biomass increase at seed rate of 50 thousand seeds/ha was 267 kg/ha, at 60 and 70 thousand seeds/ha it was 279 kg/ha.
Photosynthetic potential (PP) in 2013 and 2015 was maximum, it reached 2217 and 1883 thousand m2 x day/ha after winter wheat, 2159 and 1765 m2 x day/ha after maize, 1773 and 1400 thousand m2 x day/ha after sunflower. PP in 2014 amounted to 1772, 1658 and 1068 thousand m2 x day/ha after winter wheat, maize and sunflower. Application of N50P16K16 and N66P32K32 increased PP for three-year data to 1764 and 1897 thousand m2 x day/ha, and without fertilizing it reached 1583 thousand m2 x day/ha. As seed rate increased, photosynthetic potential of crops increased: at 50, 60 and 70 thousand seeds/ha it amounted to 1681, 1745 and 1818 thousand m2 x day/ha.
In 2013, 2014, 2015 net photosynthetic rate (NP) for precursors studied was 6.39, 6.35 and 5.53 g/m2/day, respectively. The best results were obtained in N66P32K32 variant, when NP averaged 6.25 g/m2/day, while in N50P16K16 and in control fertilizer variants it decreased by 0.06 and 0.42 g/m2/day, respectively. Optimal seed rates were 50 and 60 thousand seeds/ha, (6.19 and 6.16 g/m2/day) and at 70 thousand seeds/ha NP was 5.92 g/m2 /day.
On average over the research years, the largest mass of grain from commodity cobs was formed when corn was grown after winter wheat — 104.5 g. After maize and sunflower it decreased to 100.0 and 68.9 g. The weight of 1000 grains for these precursors was 255.6, 248.3 and 219.9 g, respectively. Grain mass was the best at variant with N66P32K32, 50 thousand seeds/ha seed rate (100.6 g and 101.3 g, 255.2 and 252.4 g, respectively).
Maize yield was influenced not only by meteorological conditions, but also by cultivation technology studied (Table 2). The best results were obtained in more favorable
2013 and 2015 research years. Winter wheat turned to be the best maize precursor — 5.524 t/ha. The lowest yield was obtained after sunflower — 3.456 t/ha. The maximum yield was achieved at N66P32K32 fertilizer application — 5.324 t/ha, and then N50P16K16 (4.813 t/ha) compared to the control (4.015 t/ha). The optimal seed rate for average of 3 years was 60 thousand seeds/ha, and in unfavorable year 2014, the best was 50 thousand seeds/ha, which is confirmed by the statistical processing data.
Table 2
Corn grain yield depending on precursors, fertilizer doses and seed rates in 2013—2015, t/ha
Factors and combinations 2013 2014 2015 average 2013—2015
Winter wheat Maize Sunflower Winter wheat Maize Sunflower Winter wheat Maize Sunflower
А 6.615 6.310 4.790 4.695 4.293 2.142 5.263 4.926 3.421
5.524 5.176 3.451
В control — 4.842 N50P16K16 — 6.039 N66P32K32— 6.835 control — 3.190 N50P16K16 —3.785 N66P32K32 —4.154 control 4.012 4.024
N50P16K16 4.614 4.813
N66P32K32 4.984 5.324
С 50 thousand — 5.570 60 thousand — 6.081 70 thousand — 6.065 50 thousand — 3.814 60 thousand — 3.734 70 thousand — 3.581 50 thousand 4.488 4.624
60 thousand 4.615 4.810
70 thousand 4.506 4.717
LSD05 2013: A,B,C = 0.064, AB, AC, BC = 0.110, ABC = 0.064
LSD05 2014: A,B,C = 0.061, AB, AC, BC = 0.106, ABC = 0.061
LSD05 2015: A,B,C = 0.066, AB, AC, BC = 0.114, ABC = 0.066
CONCLUSIONS
The experiments showed that the best maize precursors were winter wheat after black fallow and maize in cultivation of maize for grain using strip-till technology in steppe zone on chernozem soils in Volgograd region,. Sunflower was the worst maize precursor.
The best mineral nutrition was N66P32K32.
Optimal seed rate for early maize hybrid was 60 thousand seeds/ha.
© V.M. Ivanov, A.V. Kubareva, 2018.
REFERENCES
[1] Petrov NY, Imangaliev KN, Davydov SV, Zenina EA. Resource-saving technology of maize cultivation for grain in Volgograd Region. Agrarnyj vestnik Urala. 2008; 52(10):52—53. (In Russ).
[2] Meinel T. Strip-till: Innovation Kazakhstan agriculture. Pole deyatel'nosti. 2013;(11):55—57. (In Russ).
[3] Dudenhoeffer CJ, Nelson KA, Motavalli PP, Burdick B, Dunn D, Goyne KW. Utility of phosphorus enhancers and strip-tillage for corn production. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2013;5(2):37—46.
[4] Paudel B, Radovich TJ, Chan-Halbrendt C, Crow S, Tamang BB, Halbrendt J, Thapa K. Effect of conservation agriculture on maize-based farming system in the mid-hills of Nepal. Procedia Engineering. 2014;78:327—336.
[5] Belyaev VI, Meinel T, Tiessen RU. Strip-till technology: design and application features of the equipment of leading global manufacturers. Bulletin of ASAU. 2013;109(11):86—91. (In Russ).
[6] Borisenko IB, Sokolova MV. Strip-till technology as a response to tasks of a modern farmer. Poisk innovatsionnykh putei razvitiya zemledeliya v sovremennykh usloviyakh: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii posvyashchennoi 70-letiyu Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta i kafedry «Zemledelie i agrokhimiya»; 2014 may 14; Volgograd. Volgograd: Volgogradskii GAU Publ.; 2014. p.114—117. (In Russ).
[7] Kravchenko RV, Troneva OV. Effect of basic tillage on the efficiency of maize cultivation in Stavropol territory. Scientific Journal of KubSAU. 2011;71(7):680—689. (In Russ).
[8] DeJong-Hughes J, Vetsch J. On-farm comparison of conservation tillage systems for corn following soybeans. University of Minnesota Extension; 2007.
[9] Domanov NM, Ibadullaev KB, Gorokhova ZY. Agroecological efficiency of maize cultivation technologies depending on degree of intensity and weather conditions. Vestnik of VSAU. 2011;29(2):30—33. (In Russ).
[10] Fedorenko VP, Pashchenko YM, Dudka EL. Corn protection under intensive cultivation technology. Zashchita i karantin rastenii. 2011;(5): 17—24. (In Russ).
Author's personal data:
Vladimir Mihajlovich Ivanov — Doctor of Agricultural Science, professor, Volgograd State Agricultural University; e-mail: ivanov-vgsxa@mail.ru
Anastasia Vladimirovna Kubareva — PhD student, Volgograd State Agricultural University; e-mail: ivanov-vgsxa@mail.ru,
For citation:
Ivanov V.M., Kubareva A.V. Optimization of innovative strip-till technology of maize cultivation for grain on chernozem soils in steppe zone of Volgograd region. Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries, 2018, 13 (3), 224—231. doi: 10.22363/2312-797X-2018-13-3-224-231.
DOI: 10.22363/2312-797Х-2018-13-3-224-231
ОПТИМИЗАЦИЯ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ ИННОВАЦИОННОЙ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ СТРИП-ТИЛ ПРИ ВОЗДЕЛЫВАНИИ КУКУРУЗЫ НА ЗЕРНО В СТЕПНОЙ ЗОНЕ ЧЕРНОЗЕМНЫХ ПОЧВ ВОЛГОГРАДСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ
В.М. Иванов, A.В. Кубарева
ФГБОУ ВО Волгоградский государственный аграрный университет пр. Университетский, 26, Волгоград, 400002, Российская Федерация
Проведенными исследованиями в степной зоне черноземных почв Волгоградской области установлено, что для кукурузы, возделываемой на зерно по технологии Стрип-тил, лучшими предшественниками являются озимая пшеница по пару и сама кукуруза. Размещение кукурузы
после подсолнечника ежегодно обусловливало значительное снижение урожайности культуры. Из испытанных доз минеральных удобрений лучшей была N66P32K32. Оптимальной для раннеспелых гибридов кукурузы являлась норма высева 60 тыс./га всхожих семян. Было установлено, что суммарное водопотребление за трехлетний период составило 2653 м3/га с нормой удобрения N66P32K32, а кукуруза и подсолнечник — до 2700 и 2695 м3/га. С дозой удобрений N66P32K32, растения озимой пшеницы использовали влагу наиболее экономично. Коэффициент водопотребления, который показывает потребление влаги для создания тонны продукции, составил 421,0 м3/т. Для кукурузы он увеличился на 34,1, а для подсолнечника — на 247,7 м3/т, соответственно. На контроле после всех предшественников потребление влаги на тонну зерна резко увеличилось: по озимой пшенице коэффициент водопотребления составлял 551,9 м3/т, кукуруза и подсолнечник — 53,0 и 360,1 м3/т. Максимальные значения накопления сухого вещества в 2013 и 2015 гг. выявлены на стадии цветения: в зависимости от предшественника, после озимой пшеницы — 9,07 и 7,24 т/га, после кукурузы — 8,67 и 6,77, а после подсолнечника — 6,64 и 4,76 т/га, соответственно. За годы исследований наибольшее ежедневное увеличение сухой биомассы во время прорастания-цветения наблюдалось после озимой пшеницы — 452 и 361 кг/га, несколько уменьшилось после кукурузы — 432 и 337 кг/га, а после подсолнечника отмечено значительное снижение — 331 и 237 кг/га. В засушливый сезон 2014 года, в период дефицита осадков, показатели были значительно ниже. Наилучшие результаты урожайности были получены в более благоприятные по увлажнению годы исследований в 2013 и 2015 гг. Исследования показали, что лучшим предшественником кукурузы была озимая пшеница — 5,524 т/га. Самый низкий урожай был получен после подсолнечника — 3,456 т/га. Кроме того, максимальный выход был достигнут при применении удобрений N66P32K32 — 5,244 т/га, N50P16K16 — 4,813 т/га, а на контроле — 4,015 т/га.
Ключевые слова: кукуруза на зерно, минеральные удобрения, норма высева, предшественник, Стрип-тил, урожайность
БИБЛИОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ СПИСОК
[1] Петров Н.Ю. Ресурсосберегающая технология возделывания кукурузы на зерно в условиях Волгоградской области / Н.Ю. Петров, К.Н. Имангалиев, С.В. Давыдов, Е.А. Зенина // Аграрный вестник Урала. 2008. № 10 (52). С. 32—53.
[2] Майнель Т. Strip-till: Инновация в земледелии Казахстана // Поле деятельности. 2013. № 11. С. 55—57.
[3] Christopher, J Dudenhoeffer. Utility of Phosphorus Enhancers and Strip-Tillage for Corn Production / J. Christopher Dudenhoeffer, Kelly A. Nelson // Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2013. No 2. pр. 37—46.
[4] Paudela Bikash. Effect of conservation agriculture on maize-based farming system in the mid-hills of Nepal / Bikash Paudela, Theodore J.K. Radovich, Catherine Chan-Halbrendta and other // Humanitarian Technology: Science, Systems and Global Impact. 2014. No 78. pр. 327—336.
[5] Беляев В.И. Технология Strip-till: особенности конструкций машин ведущих мировых производителей и их применение / В.И. Беляев, Т. Майнель, Р. Тиссен // Вестник Алтайского ГАУ. Научный журнал. 2013. № 11 (109). С. 86.
[6] Борисенко И.Б. Технология Strip-till как ответ на решение задач современного фермера / И.Б. Борисенко, М.В. Соколова // Поиск инновационных путей развития земледелия в современных условиях: Материалы междунар. научно-практ. конф. посвященной 70-летию Волг. гос. агр. ун-та и каф «Земледелие и агрохимия»: 14 мая 2014 г. г. Волгоград. Волгоград: ФГБОУ ВПО Волг. ГАУ, 2014. 532. С. 114—117.
[7] Кравченко Р.В. Влияние основной обработки почвы на эффективность возделывания кукурузы в условиях Ставропольского края / Р.В. Кравченко, О.А. Тронева // Научный журнал КубГАУ. 2011. № 71 (07). С. 613—622.
[8] DeJong-Hughes Jodi. On-Farm Comparison of Conservation Tillage Systems for Corn Following Soybeans / Jodi DeJong-Hughes, Jeffrey Vetsch // University of Minnesota Extension. 2007. BU-08483.
[9] Доманов Н.М. Агроэкологическая эффективность технологий возделывания кукурузы на зерно в зависимости от степени интенсивности и погодных условий / Н.М. Доманов, К.Б. Ибадуллаев и др. // Вестник Воронежского ГАУ. 2011. № 2 (29). С. 30—33. [10] Федоренко В.П. Защита кукурузы при интенсивной технологии ее возделывания // Защита и карантин растений. 2011. № 5. С. 17—24. Catherine Chan-Halbrendta and other // Humanitarian Technology: Science, Systems and Global Impact. 2014. No 78. рр. 327—336.
Для цитирования:
Иванов В.М., Кубарева А.В. Оптимизация элементов инновационной технологии Стрип-тил при возделывании кукурузы на зерно в степной зоне черноземных почв Волгоградской области // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Агрономия и животноводство. 2018. Т. 13. № 3. С. 224—231. doi: 10.22363/2312-797X-2018-13-3-224-231.
