CC BY
10
d 10.24412/2181-1784-2021 -1 -649-668
mm
wrnrngpo w&mEmm^rnrMif^im^i, nmHBSûiMÉmfrj, ttA^tt^Mim^mmmmo "&MMW
m, tm^ffift, mm ft, mw^ffiftg* "mMMwmx^imm, & ^rnMMMÊMiïï^rmi, m^mxMMS, rnm^i, ^Mi
tâmHBSûmm^mij, -mmm*ixmrn^rnm^fttt, rn^rn
, MmMitmimmmrn&M
xrnm: ¿ÊMgfô; Mrn&rn
Annotation. The original context of the "contact zone" emphasizes the "colonial frontier", and the conceptual model of the center and the periphery is closely embedded in it. Pratt uses Barth's mythology to deconstruct the representational method of "travel writing", criticizes the mechanism of collusion between art and imperial ideology, and regards cultural heterogeneity as the source of cultural confrontation. The "contact zone " has become the spatial object of the postcolonial research center and the edge, the subject and the object, and the concepts of "contact ", "power asymmetry " and "heterogeneity " are clustered around it. The characteristic of high loadability makes it possible to move towards Many problem areas, such as colonial studies, gender studies, pedagogical studies, etc. The "contact zone" belongs to the category of space. In the ternary dialectics of "space, knowledge
and power", the "contact zone" is separated from the instrumental analysis concept and confronts its own spatial attributes, rather than being placed by power. , Releasing marginal sounds such as ambiguity, difference, and heterogeneity has become its mission in the third space. The "Silk Road" is a "contact zone" in a broad sense, that is, the space support for exchanges and mutual learning on the Silk Road. Said's post-colonial studies fixed "feeling structure " as the aesthetic mechanism of collusion between art and political ideology. The core feature of "feeling structure" was unilateralized, and the aesthetics of Silk Road could be effective for the interaction of "feeling structure". Give examples to explain the spatiality and interactivity of the "contact zone". In "Space and Aesthetics", it transcends unilateralism horizontally and refutes the monopoly behavior of the border areas created by the spread of modernity through time. The spatial potential of Silk Road aesthetics is released.
Keywords: "contact zone "; third space; sensation structure; silk road aesthetics
imMmmfam^nmm, (Pickles) m&rnmfc
(Rutherdale), MlS^ + l^B^M^MM^TO; W
KWft, (Olson) WftMMKStè-^^&^fôl^, ^^.
^M^^MMKBtlM^MKI^TRl^M^"liftffl^fo &
Louise Pratt )£
(Arts of contact zone) ^^frMl^i ^fêftt^M, # il, «h^m^ÏBlo
möWfrJo
1 Pratt IliSliS^fGIS^ilgiSiJiliS^SBiyi^SS® (Director of the program in Modern Thought and
Literature Arts of contact zone>^ÜE991^ffProfession ,dModern
Language Association tffi
3
4 1I08£|fflRichard Pietschmann First New Chronicle and Good
Government.^^giHKQuechua )Sïî|lI08£^ïillB|iSS^?iI,?||Bi^t-Miaï^t-tEDn3ncas )SüIßgÜig1g;Guama
lÜHpietschmann
"^M^f^M^ÛÀifâÂÉlA, MK^Äl"A"^
M-SSclecuituratlon
Ortiz, Fernando. "The Social Phenomenon of Transculturation and its Importance", in Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar. Alfred A. Knopf: New York, 97-103, 1947/1995.
7 iiraaii^ra:^
6
11
[M].^BMHJ^UägrsilHc|2005^4^1||i-335l 654
«t, , -MIîtS"Élt^ati
12
655
at, , ±
tomBAS ,
fft-iHfto -^il^fê^—TO^lmi, ^^ilSIffii^i
15
656
iJÉl^»; +
tt^taitt,
i8 Henri Lefebvre The Survival of Capitalism.Trans by Frank Bryant.St.Martin's Press,New York,i976,pi6.
20 №ISSMJ]lHffi®|2005.02
21 PaSl^geÜliM[M].RSiÜ|5ii3i<SHS|20i0^ilS993I
22
, ©TOT> >
23
24 « CM1ffiliiI[J]3§^2018^.2/i
26 Henri LefebvreThe Production of Space. Trans by Donald Nicholson-Smith,Massachusetts ,Blackwell,p12i
28 Henri Lefebvre The Production of Space. Trans by Donald Nicholson-Smith,Massachusetts ,Blackwell,p405
658
№ 20«a 70
29 Henri Lefebvre The Production of Space. Trans by Donald Nicholson-Smith,Massachusetts ,Blackwell,p407
30 M§№Mt
31 M§№Mt
32 M§№Mt
33 MjjgF"1^^
34 iiSSBis
659
«flÉWÏW) , , "o 36
fo
aiölWiio ,
36 ?i^a®[M].Hg^i|jÛÛI^,2002^12^^,i85î
3i
660
»J,
fftWftfo
41
44 Homi K.Bhabha .The Location of Culture.Lodon. Routledge,1994,pix.
46 Homi K.Bhabha The Location of Culture.Lodon. Routledge,1994,p38-39.
661
IM48, ,
49 , ^^m^^ffi^ttw c^iW)
^ , ^Ämf 419 m, 427 m> 52 o ffi^MWf
419, 427 ,
47 Homi K.Bhabha The Location of Culture. Lodon. Routledge,1ii4,p1-2.
48 MMÈBMM^^ vKOTfâl
52 33l»jaili€i9gâlil!Bi9lil[M]^gdlBIIIKb1i84^10^1|52.82^î
662
space) ,
[BT5; , M2AW,
tMW,
mxm^t'i^^WW^m^^mmwn^^Wm^57, MM^m
^W-^W^X^ , "^II" , SIM!
54
55 Henri Lefebvre The Production of Space. Trans by Donald Nicholson-Smith,Massachusetts ,Blackwell,p188.
57 nmtmtM]
lived space), I^WSI^^IWS^H^il^lo
, lived space £ third
space , ^^fW^WM^M&m , ,
, bP
, UltrêWl^tto
Â^fèttW^o
18 ^a^s 19 ,
665
(Winston Ma)Mff^WM£# (The Silk Road in Cyberspace» tfiè^tfeA
1 M^^X^S^» [M]^
2017 ^ 4 ^o
2009 ^ 8 ^o
3 «Â^É»^» 2005 ^
12 ^o
^ 2005 ^ 8 ^o
2004 ^ 6 ^o
2010 ^o
7 m «X^äi^AH» [M].^.#, iB^ttf^Ift. 1998
8 W^.mfâï^^fê» 2008 ^ 11
9 2002 ^ 12 ^o
10 UM.M ---[M].m # , ÜAK^^
fro
fr , 2010 ¥o
12 [M].^^^ » m
, 1998 ¥ 11 Mo
13 » 2014 ¥ 1 Mo
14 WKr^Mfr » 2019 ¥ 7 Mo
15 «»ÉÉÂ^: KjfâXÉfëM-^^» [M].^ A » # » » 2005 ¥ 4 M» M 21-33 ^o
16» 1964¥5Mo
17 + [M].^M: XMM , 1984 ¥ 10 Mo
18 ^M.M «^SXX^X^» MM , M^A^ftM
fr , 2008 ¥ 9 Mo
ftMfr » 2010¥8Mo
20 rni.M «MMt»iJ» [M]X№^ , #. wifö, ^.^M: AK^Mfr »
2017 ¥ 3 Mo
21 , ^^mj.^K.mW^X«™^^» [M].Ï^
^ # » HI^Mfr» 1998 ¥o
22 MmM «f^ÉÉ^» [M].^ » » 2013 ¥ 1
M » M 58 ^o
23 [J].M^ » 2019 ¥ M 4
24 » 2005.02o
25 «ilMÉWft^: + M) » 2015 ¥ 5 Mo
26 # » ffi^^ » 2006 ¥M 6
27 ^A^. [J]X^Wi.2018 ¥ 2 Mo
M)> 2014 ^ 3 ^o
29 Henri LefebvreThe Production of Space. Trans by Donald Nicholson-Smith,Massachusetts ,Blackwell.
30 Homi K.Bhabha .The Location of Culture.Lodon. Routledge,1994.
31 Henri Lefebvre The Survival of Capitalism.Trans by Frank Bryant.St.Martin's Press,New York,1976.
32 Mary Louise Pratt. Arts of the Contact Zone, Profession, Modern Language Association.1991.
33 Ortiz, Fernando. "The Social Phenomenon of Transculturation and its Importance", in Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar. Alfred A. Knopf: New York, 97-103, 1947/1995.
34 Markus Viehbeck Transcultural Encounters in the Himalayan Borderlands:Kalimpong as a "contact zone ". Heidelberg university publishing.2017.
