CC BY
10
Vestn. Samar. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki
[J. Samara State Tech. Univ., Ser. Phys. Math. Sci.], 2020, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 752-761 ISSN: 2310-7081 (online), 1991-8615 (print) d https://doi.org/10.14498/vsgtu1799
Short Communications
MSC: 74A20, 74A35, 74A60
On the Neuber theory of micropolar elasticity. A pseudotensor formulation
© V. A. Kovalev1, E. V. Murashkin2, Y. N. Radayev2
1 Moscow City Government University of Management, 28, Sretenka st., Moscow, 107045, Russian Federation.
2 A. Ishlinsky Institite for Problems in Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 101, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119526, Russian Federation.
Abstract
The present paper deals with a pseudotensor formulation of the Neuber theory of micropolar elasticity. The dynamic equations of the micropolar continuum in terms of relative tensors (pseudotensors) are presented and discussed. The constitutive equations for a linear isotropic micropolar solid is given in the pseudotensor form. The final forms of the dynamic equations for the isotropic micropolar continuum in terms of displacements and microrotations are obtained in terms of relative tensors. The refinements of Neuber's dynamic equations are discussed. Those are also considered in the cylindrical coordinate net.
Keywords: micropolarity, elasticity, continuum, microrotation, pseudoscalar, relative tensor, weight, constitutive equation.
Received: 16th July, 2020 / Revised: 17th October, 2020 / Accepted: 16th November, 2020 / First online: 22nd November, 2020
Short Communication
3 ©® The content is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Please cite this paper in press as:
Kovalev V. A., Murashkin E. V. , Radayev Y.N. On the Neuber theory of micropolar elasticity. A pseudotensor formulation, Vestn. Samar. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki [J. Samara State Tech. Univ., Ser. Phys. Math. Sci.], 2020, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 752-761. https://doi.org/10.14498/vsgtu1799. Authors' Details:
Vladimir A. Kovalev © https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-9531
D.Sc. (Phys. & Math. Sci.), Ph.D., M.Sc., Professor; Professor; Dept. of Financial Management and Financial Law; e-mail: [email protected]
Evgenii V. Murashkin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-4742
Cand. Phys. & Math. Sci., PhD, MD; Senior Researcher; Lab. of Modeling in Solid Mechanics; e-mail: [email protected]
Yuri N. Radayev © https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-2151
D.Sc. (Phys. & Math. Sci.), Ph.D., M.Sc., Professor; Leading Researcher; Lab. of Modeling in Solid Mechanics; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
752
© Samara State Technical University
1. Preliminary remarks
The classical theories of continuum mechanics often is not acceptable for mathematical modeling of the modern materials behavior (for example, elastic metamaterials [1,2] or biomaterials [3]: among them sands, soils and other granular elastic media, even perfectly plastic media exhibiting irreversible volume transformation (for instance, the Coulomb-Mohr media), fibrous media, honeycomb structures, reinforced composite materials, bones, vessels, muscles, and other tissues). In those materials the waves of microtations coupled to the displacements waves are observed due to the microstructure effects. Moreover, mirror modes of propagating waves in hemitropic media are caused by a physical mechanism manifested in the hemitropic elastic equations as their sensitivity to mirror reflections and 3D-space inversions.
A first variant of asymmetric elasticity theory was developed by the Cosserats brothers (1909) in the pioneering work [4]. Further consideration of the micropolar theory for finite deformation have been carried out by Truesdell and Toupin [5]. The Aero and Kuvshinskii derived linear constitutive equation of micropolar continuum in [6]. The material anisotropy of micropolar media has been considered and discussed in the Mindlin studies (see for example [7,8]). The problem of stress concentration is the subject of the Neuber papers [9-11]. An extension of micropolar theory to the hemitropic case can be found in [12,13].
In the general case of micropolar anisotropy the elastic material is specified by the 171 constitutive constant, which extremely complicates the equations analysis while solving applied problems. A semi-isotropic (hemitropic) solid is determining by nine constitutive constants of which only three new dimensionless ones if compared to the isotropic case. Literary search shows that papers devoted to micropolar theory often contain errors and misprints in the fundamental equations (see for example [10,14]) making them difficult to understand.
Another important issue in mathematical modelling of micropolar material behaviour is a deficiency of relative tensors technique [5,15-25], since micropolar characteristics actually are relative tensors. The relative tensors notation provides a deep insight to the physical and geometric nature of considered physical fields. Nonetheless, relative tensors notation in the continuum mechanics is not widespread. The most recent relative tensor formulation of hemitropic micropolar continuum in application to growing solid mechanics is discussed in [26].
The present paper is arranged as follows. The second section is devoted to a number of fundamental definitions from relative tensors algebra. The covariant derivative of an arbitrary relative tensor is considered.
In Sec. 3 Neuber's dynamic equations are derived in terms of relative tensors. The constitutive equations for linear isotropic micropolar continuum are furnished by pseudotensors notation. The weights of relative tensors of linear micropolar elastic medium and constitutive scalars are verified and presented by tables 1 and 2. The final form of Neuber's dynamic equations in an arbitrary curvilinear coordinate system is obtained. The misprints in Neuber's dynamic equations known from [10] are corrected.
The Sec. deals with a formulation of dynamic equations in cylindrical coordinate net. The obtained equations are of crucial importance for investigating wave propagation in long cylindrical waveguides.
The final section contains concluding remarks.
2. Relative tensors algebra and covariant differentiation
The permutation symbols and the fundamental orienting pseudoscalar are fundamental objects of relative tensor theory. This theory is a subject of many discussions found in multidimensional geometry tutorials and tensor analysis books [5,15-25,27]. A re-orientation of a coordinate frame (left-handed into into right-handed or vice versa) can be afforded by re-enumeration of coordinate axes, thus allowing to introduce the fundamental object of relative tensor algebra and multidimensional geometry — the Levi-Civita permutation symbols [18]. It is well known, that the permutation symbols determined according to
i+1 fortriplets (1, 2, 3), (2, 3,1), (3,1, 2); 1 e ijk = 1 e jk = < -1 for triplets (3, 2,1), (1, 3, 2), (2,1, 3); I 0 in all other cases;
[-1] [+1] • k
are not absolute tensors. In fact, permutation symbols €ijk and e %3 are the relative tensors (pseudotensors) of the weight —1 (w.g.t. = -1) and at the same time — relative contravariant tensors of the weight +1 (w.g.t. = +1). Hereinafter, position above a root symbol is reserved for weight of a relative tensor which is additionally embraced by square brackets.
We proceed to discussion of an orienting pseudoscalar (relative scalar of weight +1 (w.g.t. = +1)), defined by the sequential application of inner and cross products to the covariant basis vectors:
[+1]
e = i (IX i) (1)
12 3
and the relative scalar of the negative weight —1 (w.g.t. = —1):
[-1L1 1 /2 3 e 1 = i ■ (t x i).
Note that the pseudoscalar (1) is related to the parallelepiped volume built on the vectors %. In further considerations, we will omit the weight indication for
fundamental symbols such as e, e^k, e%:jk and also true for zero weight relative tensors. Here once again, we emphasize that e > 0 for a right-handed coordinate system, e < 0 for a left-handed coordinate system.
In general, the transformation formula for a relative tensor of weight W reads by [15-17]
rgrr = A w (dpxl ■ ■ ■ (dsxn)(dixa)(d]xb) ■ ■ ■ (d-kxc)Tpj:;:,
— ■ d — d A = det(a- x%), dp = —, dp = —.
v 3 h p dxP' p dxP
Here, an overlined symbol should be considered as related to new coordinates xk (k = 1,2,3), A denotes the transformation Jacobian.
Covariant derivative of the relative tensor T^™' 'kn of a given weight W is similarly defined by the corresponding derivative for an absolute tensor [15,17,21]:
where
[ W ] [ W ] [ w ]
Y7 rp lm---n _ a rp Im-'-n i m sm-'-nj^l i
vp J ¿7—k = °P 1 ij—k + 1 ij—k r sp +
ij—k
JP
ij—k
ij—k i [w],
_ pi rp Im---n
r sp ^ sj---k
[ W]
■ rp lm••• 5rs _
* * + ^ ij••• k r ip
[ W] [ W]
_pl rp lm---n _ tit rp Im---n-ps (2)
' ' r sp ^ ij---s '' ^ ij---k r sp- (2)
3. Reminder and refinement of Neuber's micropolar elasticity theory
The applying relative tensors formalism to the Neuber's theory allows to clarify its physical sense. The dynamic equations in terms of relative tensors can be presented in contrary to [9]
V XtXu = pd.d.Vu,
[_2]
v \ _nXu + euXr!tXv = - e aa[+V
(3)
In the latter equation contrary to the Neuber theory we use e«>v despite of weights unbalance.
The equations (3) in a curvilinear coordinate net can be rearranged due to (2) as follows
dxtxu + tvuT^X + tXr> T^ = pd.d.Vu,
[_ % u . [_ i]u^A . [_I]a,^u . [_1];
dx m u + [ mur> Txx + m ^T^ + m lXuT^x + eu Xv tXv = - 0 d.d.u ]U
(4)
i^V-u . i-llA^n . „.An, [^Uol+i],
Linear isotropic micropolar elastic constitutive equations [9] in terms of rela-
Table 1
Relative tensors of the isotropic micropolar elasticity
Standard terminology Notation adopted in [26] Neuber's notation Weight Transformation to absolute tensor
displacements vector uk yu 0
asymmetric strain tensor force stress tensor eij aik dxu tAM 0 0
mass density P P 0
couple stress tensor Àk mxu -1 mAu = e m Au
microinertia I 6 -2 J-2] 6 = e2 6
microrotation vector wryness tensor & < + 1 + 1 u 1 [+1]* u)u = - w u e 1 [+1] k\u = _ k\u e
tive tensors are furnished by
tA1 = G[(1 + e2' a2l)VAF^ + (1 - e2' a2l)VVA + 2[ aVA,?+J+
+ 2i/(1 - 2z/)-1^AlV,,V^], (5)
[m%M = 4G[ /][ ¿1][V[+/]» + ftv^+l^ + c^V,,[+/],?].
In the above formulae the constitutive scalars and pseudoscalars are denoted
by:
- G is the shear modulus of elasticity;
- v is the Poisson ratio; [-1]
- is the micropolar characteristic length; [-2]
- a ,b,c are dimensionless constitutive scalars.
Upon substituting constitutive equations (5) in equations (3) the Neuber dynamic equations in terms of relative tenors read by
(1 + e 2 a )AV^ + ((1 - 2v)-1 - e2 a )V VaVa+ + 2[ aVA" Va+J = pG-1d.d.V1,
[-21 '- 1l '-1l [+1] '-il '- 1l [+1K
('a1 -I I A)[+]i - I I (b + ^V^V A+-
[a] [-2] [+1]
— JL.vvVa = — 9 (4G)-1aa[+>.
Note that in the original paper [9] the multiplier I2 is omitted in the second term of the second equation of the system (6).
Dynamic equations of linear micropolar elasticity by notation introduced in [13,26] in relative tensors are represented by
(1 + e 2[-c1)V sV s U + (1 — e2-] + 2v(1 — 2u)-1)VlVk uk+
[-2W, [+1]
+ 2c1etki V k 0 = pG-1d.d.U
[-1][-1] 2 [+2] [+1] 2 [+2] [+1]. L L [(1 + e-2[ c2)VsVs 0 + (1 — e c2 + 2C3)V*Vk 0 k] —
(7)
[-2l [+1l [-2l [+1l - 2[ c1(2 <pi - elklgksVsul) = I G-1d.d. <t.
Comparison of equations (6) and (7) leads to the relations between the micropolar constitutive constants in the form
[-11[_11 bin-!] [-2l [-2l [+2l 1 -b C
L L =2 1 I (1 + b), C1 = a , c2 = ——T, c3
1+ 3 1+
The weights of the Neuber constitutive scalars and pseudoscalars l,a,b,c are given by table 2. The weight of constitutive scalar b in table 2 is verified by formula
2 [+2] 2— 2
2+ 2
Table 2
Micropolar constitutive scalars of Neuber's theory
Standard terminology Root notation Weight Transformation
to absolute tensor
shear modulus of elasticity G 0
the Poisson ratio V 0
micropolar characteristic length 1 -1 [-1] 1 = e 1
dimensionless -2 2[-2] a = e2 a 1
micropolar modulus i a
dimensionless b 0
micropolar modulus ii
dimensionless c 0
micropolar modulus iii
4. Neuber's dynamic equations in cylindrical coordinates
We proceed the paper to consideration of Neuber's dynamic equations in cylindrical coordinate net (r, fi, z). It is convenient to assume that the reference plane of the former is the Cartesian ^y-plane (with equation 2 = 0), and the cylindrical axis is the Cartesian 2-axis. Then the z-coordinate is the same in both systems. The transformation formulae between cylindrical (r, fi, z) and Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) can be furnished by
X = r COS fi, y = r Sin fi, z = z.
The nonzero components of metric tensor and Christoffel symbols are determined by
911 = 1, 922 = r2, 933 = 1, r22 = -r, rf2 =r2! = r-1.
Thus, the dynamic equations (4) can be presented in following form
dr (rtrr) + dptpr + rdztzr - tpp = rpdx)yr,
(tpp) + dp(rtrp) + ^dztzp + tpr = rpd.d.v1, rdz (tzz) + dptpz + dr (rtzr) = rpd• a Fz,
iW ^ , « ^ , «[-1] , [-1] , n , \ ["2U [+Hr (8)
dr(r mrr) - mpp + dp mVr + rdz mzr + m>rr + r(tpz - tzp) = rOd• a u , (8)
[-1] . MK , M] , o M] , _l[-1] . „ , ^ J+1]p
dp + dr(r mrip)+ mvr + rdz mzip + r 1 mrif + r(tzr - trz)= rdd^d^
w
[-1^ * [-1] , « [-1] , [-1] , n * ^ [-)2**[+1]z dr(r mrz) + dp mVz + rdz mzz + mrz + r(Up - tw) = rOd^d^ u .
The obtained equations (8) are of crucial importance for investigating waves propagation in long cylindrical waveguides.
5. Conclusions
(i) The Neuber dynamic equations of the linear micropolar continuum in terms of relative tensors (pseudotensors) in an arbitrary curvilinear coordinate system are presented and discussed. The misprints in original Neuber's dynamic equations are eliminated.
(ii) The constitutive equations for linear isotropic micropolar continuum are furnished by pseudotensors notation.
(iii) The weights of relative tensors of linear micropolar elastic medium and the Neuber constitutive scalars are verified and given by tables 1 and 2.
(iv) The final forms of the dynamic equations for the isotropic micropolar continuum in terms of displacements and microrotations are obtained in terms of relative tensors.
(v) The refinements of the final form of Neuber's dynamic equations are discussed.
Competing interests. We declare that we have no competing interests. Author's Responsibilities. We take full responsibility for submitting the final manuscript in print. We approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding. This study was in part financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (State Registration Number AAAA-A20-120011690132-4) and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (projects nos. 1801-00844, 20-01-00666).
Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to the reviewers for careful reading of the paper and valuable improvements, suggestions and comments.
References
1. Maugin G. A. Non-classical continuum mechanics, Advanced Structured Materials, vol.51. Singapore, Springer Verlag, 2017, xvii+259 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-981-10-2434-4.
2. Chandrasekhar S. Liquid Crystals. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992, xvi+460 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511622496.
3. Goriely A. The mathematics and mechanics of biological growth, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics book series, vol.45. New York, Springer, 2017, xxii+646 pp. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-0-387-87710-5.
4. Cosserat E., Cosserat F. Théorie des corps déformables. Paris, A. Hermann et fils, 1909, 126 pp.
5. Truesdell C., Toupin R. The Classical Field Theories, In: Principles of Classical Mechanics and Field Theory, Encyclopedia of Physics, vol. III/1; eds. S. Flügge. Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg, Springer, 1960, pp. 226-902. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45943-6_ 2.
6. Aero E. L., Kuvshinskii E. V. Fundamental equations of the theory of elastic media with rotationally interacting particles, Soviet Physics-Solid State, 1961, vol.2, no. 7, pp. 12721281.
7. Mindlin R. D., Tiersten H. F. Effects of couple-stresses in linear elasticity, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 1962, vol.11, no. 1, pp. 415-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00253946.
8. Mindlin R. D. Influence of couple-stresses on stress concentrations, Experimental Mechanics, 1963, vol.3, no. 1, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02327219.
9. Neuber H. Über Probleme der Spannungskonzentration im Cosserat-Körper, Acta Mechan-ica, 1966, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 48-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176729.
10. Neuber H. On the general solution of linear-elastic problems in isotropic and anisotropic Cosserat continua, In: Applied Mechanics; eds. Gortler H.. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 1966, pp. 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29364-5_16.
11. Neuber H. On the Effect of Stress Concentration in Cosserat Continua, In: Mechanics of Generalized Continua; eds. Kroner E.. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 1968, pp. 109-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30257-6_13.
12. Dyszlewicz J. Micropolar Theory of Elasticity, Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, vol.15. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2004, xv+345 pp. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-540-45286-7.
13. Radayev Yu. N. The Lagrange multipliers method in covariant formulations of micropolar continuum mechanics theories, Vestn. Samar. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki [J. Samara State Tech. Univ., Ser. Phys. Math. Sci.], 2018, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 504-517 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14498/vsgtu1635.
14. Nowacki W. Theory of Asymmetric Elasticity. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1986, viii+383 pp.
15. Veblen O., Thomas T. Y. Extensions of Relative Tensors, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 1924, vol.26, no. 3, pp. 373-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/1989146.
16. Veblen O., Thomas T. Y. The geometry of paths, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 1923, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 551-608. https://doi.org/10.2307/1989307.
17. Veblen O. Invariants of Quadratic Differential Forms. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1927, 102 pp.
18. Levi-Civita T. The Absolute Differential Calculus (Calculus of Tensors). London, Glasgow, Blackie & Son Limited, 1927, 450 pp.
19. Shirokov P. A. Tensor Calculus: Tensor Algebra. Moscow, Leningrad, ONTI GTTI, 1934, 464 pp. (In Russian)
20. Schouten J. A. Tensor Analysis for Physicist. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1951, x+275 pp.
21. Thomas T. Y. Concepts from Tensor Analysis and Differential Geometry, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 1. London, New York, Academic Press, 1961, v+119 pp.
22. Sokolnikoff I. S. Tensor Analysis: Theory and Applications to Geometry and Mechanics of Continua. New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1964, xii+361 pp https://archive.org/ details/tensoranalysisth0000soko.
23. Gurevich G. B. Foundations of the Theory of Algebraic Invariants. Groningen, P. Noordhoff, 1964, viii+418 pp.
24. Synge J. L., Schild A. Tensor Calculus, vol. 5. New York, Courier Corporation, 1978, 334 pp.
25. Das A. Tensors: The mathematics of Relativity Theory and Continuum Mechanics. New York, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007, xii+290 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-0-387-69469-6.
26. Murashkin E. V., Radayev Yu. N. On a micropolar theory of growing solids, Vestn. Samar. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki [J. Samara State Tech. Univ., Ser. Phys. Math. Sci.], 2020, vol.24, no. 3, pp. 424-444. https://doi.org/10.14498/vsgtu1792.
27. Rosenfeld B. A. Multidimensional Spaces, In: A History of Non-Euclidean Geometry, Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, 12. New York, Springer, 1988, pp. 247-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8680-1_7.
Вестн. Сам. гос. техн. ун-та. Сер. Физ.-мат. науки. 2020. Т. 24, № 4. С. 752-761
ISSN: 2310-7081 (online), 1991-8615 (print)
d https://doi.org/10.14498/vsgtu1799
УДК 539.3
К теории микрополярной упругости Нейбера. Псевдотензорная формулировка
© В. А. Ковалев1, Е. В. Мурашкин2, Ю. Н. Радаев2
1 Московский городской университет управления Правительства Москвы,
Россия, 107045, Москва, ул. Сретенка, 28.
2 Институт проблем механики им. А. Ю. Ишлинского РАН,
Россия, 119526, Москва, просп. Вернадского, 101, корп. 1.
Аннотация
Рассматривается псевдотензорная формулировка теории микрополярной упругости Нейбера. Приведены и обсуждаются динамические уравнения микрополярного континуума в терминах относительных тензоров (псевдотензоров). Даны определяющие уравнения для линейного изотропного микрополярного твердого тела. Окончательные формы динамических уравнений для изотропного микрополярного континуума в терминах смещений и микровращений получены в терминах относительных тензоров. Устранены недочеты в окончательной форме динамических уравнений Нейбера. Получены динамические уравнения Нейбера в цилиндрической системе координат.
Ключевые слова: микрополярность, упругость, континуум, микровращение, псевдоскаляр, относительный тензор, вес, определяющее уравнение.
Получение: 16 июля 2020 г. / Исправление: 17 октября 2020 г. / Принятие: 16 ноября 2020 г. / Публикация онлайн: 22 ноября 2020 г.
Краткое сообщение
3 ©® Контент публикуется на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru) Образец для цитирования
Kovalev V. A., Murashkin E. V. , Radayev Y.N. On the Neuber theory of micropolar elasticity. A pseudotensor formulation, Vestn. Samar. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., Ser. Fiz.-Mat. Nauki [J. Samara State Tech. Univ., Ser. Phys. Math. Sci.], 2020, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 752-761. https://doi.org/10.14498/vsgtu1799.
Сведения об авторах
Владимир Александрович Ковалев © https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-9531 д.ф.-м.н.; профессор; каф. финансового менеджмента и финансового права; e-mail: [email protected]
Евгений Валерьевич Мурашкин& https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-4742 к.ф.-м.н.; старший научный сотрудник; лаб. моделирования в механике деформируемого твердого тела; e-mail: evmurashkin@google. com
Юрий Николаевич Радаев © https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-2151
доктор физико-математических наук, профессор; ведущий научный сотрудник; лаб. моделирования в механике деформируемого твердого тела; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
760
© Самарский государственный технический университет
Конкурирующие интересы. Заявляем, что в отношении авторства и публикации этой статьи конфликта интересов не имеем.
Авторский вклад и ответственность. Все авторы принимали участие в разработке концепции статьи и в написании рукописи. Авторы несут полную ответственность за предоставление окончательной рукописи в печать. Окончательная версия рукописи была одобрена всеми авторами.
Финансирование. Работа выполнена в рамках государственного задания (№ госрегистрации АААА-А20-120011690132-4) и при поддержке Российского фонда фундаментальных исследований (проекты № 18-51-00844, № 20-01-00666). Благодарности. Авторы благодарят рецензента за внимательное прочтение статьи, ценные предложения и комментарии.
