ON THE FLEXIBILITY OF TYPE I HALF LOGISTIC EXPONENTIATED FRECHET DISTRIBUTION
Olalekan Akanji Bello r Sani Ibrahim Doguwa1 Abukakar Yahaya1 Haruna Mohammed Jibril2 Department of Statistics, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria1. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria,
Nigeria2.
In this article, we delve into the modeling and analysis of lifetimes, which hold substantial importance across various scientific and industrial fields. Our focus is on introducing a novel distribution termed the Type I Half-Logistic Exponentiated Frechet (TIHLEtF) Distribution, which is an extension of the Frechet distribution. We have derived a crucial representation of the density function for this distribution. Furthermore, we explore several statistical properties associated with the TIHLEtF distribution. These properties encompass explicit expressions for the quantile function, probability-weighted moments, moments, moments generating function, reliability function, hazard function, and order statistics. To estimate the model parameters, we employ the maximum likelihood estimation technique and present the results of a simulation study. To emphasize the superiority of our newly introduced distribution, we apply it to two real datasets. The outcomes of our analysis reveal that the TIHLEtF distribution outperforms the other considered distributions in terms of fitting the data in these real-world cases.
Keywords Type I Half-Logistic Exponentiated-G, Frechet distribution, Quantile function, Hazard function, Maximum likelihood, Order Statistics
The Frechet distribution, often referred to as the type II extreme value distribution, plays a crucial role in various fields, including engineering, actuarial science, environmental studies, medical sciences, economics, finance, and insurance. It serves as a fundamental statistical tool in these disciplines. It was introduced by [10] as a means of modeling extreme values in data. Despite the widespread use of traditional probability distributions in these areas, there is a growing need for more flexible forms of these distributions, and the Frechet distribution is one such example that has been proposed to meet this need. It is a flexible tool for modeling data and is widely used in extreme value theory. Various researchers have proposed several modifications to the Frechet
[email protected]' [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
|2
Abstract
I. Introduction
^ » ^ 11 c t t~\ » w 1 IT1, T., ., RT&A, No 3 (79)
O A. Bello SI D°guwa A. Yahaya/ H.M. Jibri1 Volume 19 September 2024
On the Flexibility of TIHLEtF Distribution_VOlUme 19 September 2U24
distribution in recent literature. The exponentiated Frechet was first introduced by [16], followed by the beta Frechet proposed by [17], and the transmuted Frechet proposed by [13]. The gamma extended Frechet defined by [7], while [12] introduced the Marshall-Olkin Frechet. The Kumaraswamy Frechet proposed by [14], while [9] studied the transmuted exponentiated Frechet. [1] investigated the transmuted Marshall-Olkin Frechet, and [3] proposed the Kumaraswamy Marshall-Olkin Frechet, [2] also studied the Weibull Frechet. A novel distribution family was introduced by [4] in their recent study, which they have named Type I Half-Logistic Exponentiated-G (TIHLEt-G). This distribution family is characterized by two positive shape parameters, denoted by A and a , and can be applied to any arbitrary cumulative distribution function (cdf) H (x,5). The cumulative distribution function (cdf) and the probability density function (pdf) for TIHLEt-G are given by
1 _ ri _ Ha( r 9)1A
G(x; A,a,£) = —[-, x > 0, A,a> 0 (1)
and
2Aah(x;$)H*_I[1 _H" ,]A_1
Ul^G(xA,a,S) =-( ) (x;*)[ ^ 2x;*)J , x > 0 A,a> 0 (2)
[1 + [1 _ H (^f]
The TIHLEt-G family of distributions is noteworthy due to several factors, as explained in [4]. This family of distributions offers increased flexibility in terms of kurtosis compared to conventional models. It also enables the creation of skewed distributions even for symmetrical ones and can produce heavy-tailed distributions that better fit real data. The TIHLEt-G family can generate symmetric, left-skewed, right-skewed, and reversed-J shaped distributions and allows for special models with different types of hazard rate functions. The Frechet distribution's cdf and pdf are provided as _(-)s
H(x;0,3) = e x , x > 0,0,3 > 0 (3)
_(-f
h(x;0,3) = 303x-3_1e x , x > 0,0,3 > 0 (4)
The rest of the paper is organized into several sections. The second section describes the materials and a method used to drive the pdf and cdf of Type I Half-Logistic Exponentiated Frechet (TIHLEtF) Distribution and presents the expansion of the density. In the third section, we explore the statistical properties of the distribution, including its moment, moment-generating function, probability-weighted moment, reliability function, hazard function, and quantile function. The fourth section derives order statistics. The fifth section describes how maximum likelihood estimation is used to estimate the unknown model parameters and presents the results of a simulation study. The sixth section demonstrates the flexibility of the TIHLEtF distribution using two real data sets. Finally, the paper concludes with a summary of the findings and some closing remarks in the seventh section.
II. The Type I Half-Logistic Exponentiated Frechet (TIHLEtF) Distribution
A new model called the TIHLEtF model is introduced, where a random variable X is said to follow the TIHLEtF model if its cumulative distribution function (cdf) is obtained by using equation (3) in equation (1), which is defined as follows:
FTlHLEtF (X; 1 a, = '
1 - f -a(^ л
1 - e x
V J
1 +
1 -
( -a(^
1 '
x > 0,X,a,6,5 > 0
(5)
V 7
and the pdf corresponding to equation (6) is
-(-f -(a-\X-f
fTIHLEtp(x;Ä,a,e,ö) = 2Xaô0sx-s-1e x e x
where d is a scale parameter and A, a, 5 are shape parameters.
Л-1 Й „ л
1 +
1 - e x 1 - e x
(6)
Figure 1: Plots of pdf of TIHLEtF distribution for different values of parameters
III. Expansion of Density for TIHLEtF Distribution
In this section, we present an advantageous expansion of the pdf and cdf for the TIHLEtF distribution. As a result of the generalized binomial series being
x-j ^ (b + i-1)
(1 + z )b = £ (-1)'
i=0 V i
Moreover, by applying the binomial theorem from equation (7) to equation (6)
fT1HLEtF (x;1,a,e,S) = 2asesx-s-1e x e x £ ( -1)
i=0
f1+ i 1 " -(-)s~ a
1 - e x
V i _ _
1(i+1)-1
(7)
also
r -, a
1 - - 9
e x
A(i+1)-1
=E ( -1)J
j=0
(A(i +1) -1)
Now, the pdf can be written as
fTIHLEtF (x; A a 9,8) = ]T nP
i, j =0
a( j+1)
(8)
where, n = 2AaS9sx-s-1(- 1J+J
i + 1)
V ' J
A(i + 1) -1)
J
Furthermore, an expansion for the [F^^^p (x; A, a, 9, c>)] is produced, with h being an integer, and the binomial expansion is worked out once more.
[F„ (x;A,a,0,S)]h = £ ( -1)p+m
p, m=0
(h)(h + p -1)
v m J
1) " -(9)s~ a
1 - e x
J _ _
A( p+m)
Consider
n a
1 - -9
e x
A( p+m )
=E ( -1)2
( A( p + m) ^
2=0
The cdf can be written as:
[ ftihlef (x;a,a,e,s)] =
p,m=0
(9)
where, (pt = ^ ( -1)
p+m+z
2=0
h + p-1)( h )(A(m + p) )
p
v m J
h
z
J
J
V
v
IV. Statistical Properties We derived some statistical properties of the new distribution. I. Probability weighted moments
The probability-weighted moments (PWMs) were introduced by [11]. It is used to derive inverse form estimators for the parameters and quantiles of a distribution. The PWMs, is denoted by Kr s which can be derived for a random variable X using the following affiliations.
K,s = E[XrF(x)s ] = J xrf (x)F(x)sdx (10)
The PWMs of TIHLEtF distribution is developed by substituting (8) and (9) into (10), and substituting h with s, as proceed
(( j+1+ z )
Krs = EE w j;
i, j=0 p,m=0 Consider the integral
dx
x'
a(j+1+z )
dx
,0s
Let y = a( j +1 + z)(—)s ^ x = x
a( j +1 + z)0s
y
; dx = ■
dyx
S-1
00öa( j +1 + z)
Then
a( j +1 + z)0è
dyx
s-1
y _ 393a(j +1 + z)
The PWMs of TIHLEtF can be written as proceed
œ s L L-i r
Krs = Ë Ë (a)39(j +1 + z)5 -~g)
r
f»œ — r
= Jo y se~>dy = r(1 - -)
i, j=0 p,m=0
now
<Pt=Y ( - !)
z ,q=0
and fjp =
p+m+z+q
s + p-1Y s YÂ(m + p)^
P J
v m J
ri + \\(A(i +1) -f\
v ' J
(11)
(12)
œ
0
1
r
œ
z
II.
Moments
Moments are fundamental to all statistical analysis, particularly in applications. So, for the new distribution, we determine the rth moment.
/•œ
E(Xr ) = J xr/(x)dx
Using the important representation of the pdf as shown in equation (8), we have
x
œ
E(X )=Ënp j;
i, j=0
Consider the integral
a(j+1)
dx
x
-(-f
a( j+1)
dx
0 s
Let w = a(j + 1)(—)s ^ x = x
Then
a(j + l)0é y
1
s , dwxs-1 ; dx =
a( j + 1)0sS
(13)
(14)
a(j + 1)0s y
dwx
S-1 r r r r
— --1 /»œ----/»œ----r
- = 0ras(j + 1)s J w se-wdw = J w se~wdw = T(1 —)
a(j + 1)0ss j0 j0 s
œ
0
r
œ
0
The rth moment of the TIHLEtF distribution can be expressed as follows
r r
-1 r.
E(Xr) =£vfas(j +1)à Г(1 --)
i,j=0 à
(15)
Now
Tjp = 2Ясх(-1)
i+j
i + 11
V ' J
1(i +1) -11
The expected value and the spread of the TIHLEtF distribution can be described by the following
" 11 -i 1 E(X) =Y%ea5(j +1)5 T(1 -^
i, j=0
and
Ш i i_l 1
var ( x )=£nP a (j + 1)à Г(1 - -)-
i,j=0 à
ш 1 1_1 1
£^0aà(j + 1)à Г(1 --)
i,j=0 à
III. Moment-generating function (mgf)
The Moment-Generating Function of x is expressed as follows:
Mx (t ) = f etCf ( x)dx
(16)
where the expansion of eîx = £
(tx) "
m!
The moment-generating function of TIHLEtF distribution can be represented as follows
m m ,
--1 mN
5'
Mx (t ) =££
i, j=0 m=0
tmVpemas (j+1)à г(1 - m)
m!
(17)
IV. Reliability function
The reliability function provides the likelihood that an individual will endure beyond a designated time frame. This function is defined as follows:
R( x;1,a,0,3) =
r -, a
1 - -(-)à
e x
- -
1 +
r -, a
1 - -(-)à
e x
(18)
V. Hazard function
The hazard function represents the likelihood of the event of interest happening within a relatively brief time period. It can be defined as follows:
2
m=0
1
1
Aa303x 3le
T (x; A, a,0,3) =
1- a 1 A a ~l
1+ 1 _ [ _ 1 _ [ _(-)3_
e x e x
(19)
VI. Quantile Function
The quantile function, also known as the inverse CDF, of the TIHLEtF distribution is obtained by using the CDF in equation (5)
x = Q(u) =
0
(20)
_ log
1 _
1 _ U U +1
The median of the TIHLEtF distribution can be derived by substituting U=0.5 in equation (20) as follows:
0
median = Q(0.5) =-r (21)
_ log
1 _
1 _ 0.5 0.5 +1
- 01 = 1.2 6=1.2 1=3 0=1.5
-- 01 = 12 8 = 1.2 1=5 0=1.5 \ a = 1.2 6 = 1.2 1=7 a=1.5
Figure 2: Plots of the hazard function of the TIHLEtF distribution for different parameter values.
VII. Order Statistics
Let X,X,...,Xbe independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) random variables with their corresponding continuous distribution functionF(x). Let XVn < X« < ... < X„ the corresponding ordered random sample from the TIHLEtF distributions. Let Frn (x) and fr.n (x), r = 1,2,3,..., n denote the CDF and PDF of the rth order statistics Xr.n respectively. The PDF of the rth order statistics of Xrn is given as:
f (x; 2, a, 9) =-f(x)-E ( -1)1
) B(r, n - r +1) E )
i
n - r
[ F (x)]v
(22)
The PDF of r order statistic for TIHLEtF distribution is derived by substituting equation (8) and equation (9) into equation (22). Also replacing h with v + r — 1 in equation (9), so we
fr.n (x;2,a,9,5) =
1
n—r ro r+v—1
B(r, n r + 1) v=0 i, j=0 p,m=0
EE E (- 1)v
( n — r^
V v J
VpVt
a( j+i+z)
(23)
The PDF of minimum order statistic of the TIHLEtF distribution is obtained by setting r = 1 in equation (23) as
n—1 ro v
fin(x;2,a,9,5) = 2n2a595x-5—1EE E (— 1)'+j(—1)P+m+z(—1)
v=0 i, j=0 p,m=0
(n — 1Y i +
V v J
V ' J
(2(i +1) — 1V v + p — 1Y v Y2(m + p) ^
j
V m J
a( j+i+z)
(24)
Also, the PDF of maximum order statistic of the TIHLEtF distribution is obtained by setting r = n in equation (23) as
fn:n (x; 2, a, 9,5) = 2«2a59V5—1 E E (— 1)*+' (—1)p+m+z (—1)
i, j=0 p,m=0
(i + \\(2(i +1) —
(n + v + p — 2 Y n + v — 1Y 2(m + p) ^
m
—(-f
VJ
a( j+i+z)
(25)
z
ro n+v—1
z
V. Parameter Estimation
Given complete data, we investigate the maximum likelihood method to estimate the TIHLEtF distribution's unknown parameters. Maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) are attractive because they can be used to produce confidence intervals and offer straightforward approximations that work well in finite samples. The resulting approximation for MLEs is simple to handle in distribution theory, both analytically and numerically. Let , x^, x^,..., x be a random sample of size n from the TIHLEtF distribution. Then, the likelihood function based on the observed sample for the vector of the parameter (2, a, 9,5)T is given by
log L = n log(2) + n log(A) + n log(a) + n log(S) + nS log(0) - (S -1)2 log( x)
n /} n
-a2 (- )S+ (A-1)2 log
i=1 xi i=1
1-
- (-)S
- 22 log
1 +
1-
- (-)S
(26)
The components of the score vector AL =
dL (0) dL (0) dL (0) dL (<f>)
dA ' da ' d0 ÜS
are given as
d log L n -A,
= T+2 log
dA A
i=1
1 -
-(-)S
- 22
i=1
^=n(- )S+(A-1)2
da a ft X TT
" -( a " -(
e X log e X
_ _ _ _
1-
-(- )S
A
+ 22-
i=1
- a A-1 a
" _(-)s" " _(- )S" " _(-)s"
1 - e X e X log e X
= 0
1 +
1 -
-(-)S x
^ = n + n log(0) + 2 log( Xi) - a2 (-)S log(-)
do o
i =1
a
+ (A-1)2"
i=1 Xi Xi a-1 a
- (-)S xi
-(-> 0 x 0 e x (-)S log(-) X x.
i=1
1-
-(-)S
A
22-
i=1
n-1 A-1
1 - -(- )S -(- )S
e Xi a e Xi
1 - " _(-)s e X - a A log 1 - " -( e X a
1 + a 1 - a -(- )S e Xi X A
= 0
e X (-)S log—)
— x.
= 0
" _(-)S" a
1+ 1 - e Xi
(27)
(28)
i=1
i=1
T
a
n
a
n
A
^^ = — — a5E (0)5—11 + (2 —1)E
59 9 E x x E
-(0)5 9 x' 5(—)
5—1
1
i i
1—
—(9 5
n
2E
i=1
- a 2—1 a—1
■ —(9 )5" ~ —(9 )5" —(9 )5 9 s, 1
2 1— e xi a e xi
1+
r r -, a
—(9 )5
1— e xi
= 0
(30)
a
2
5L U) 5L U) 5L U) 5L U) The MLEs are obtained by setting -,-,-and- to zero and solving these
52 5a 59 55
equations simultaneously. These equations cannot be solved analytically, so we have to appeal to numerical method.
I. Simulation Study
In this section, a numerical analysis will be conducted to evaluate the performance of MLE for TIHLEtF Distribution.
Table 1: MLEs, biases and RMSE for some values of parameters
(1.5,1,2,1.5) (2,1,3,2.5)
n Parameters Estimated Bias RMSE Estimated Bias RMSE
Values Values
2 1.5650 0.0650 0.7475 2.1548 0.1548 0.9708
20 a 1.0471 0.0471 0.5045 1.0385 0.0385 0.4666
9 2.0348 0.0348 0.3533 3.0465 0.0465 0.3439
5 1.7878 0.2878 0.7086 2.8275 0.3275 0.9009
2 1.5507 0.0507 0.5664 2.1074 0.1074 0.7485
50 a 1.0106 0.0106 0.3523 1.0073 0.0073 0.3337
9 2.0310 0.0310 0.2845 3.0360 0.0360 0.2589
5 1.6328 0.1328 0.4472 2.6418 0.1418 0.5924
100 2 1.5251 0.0251 0.4358 2.0546 0.0546 0.5630
a 1.0024 0.0024 0.2587 1.0024 0.0024 0.2520
9 2.0271 0.0271 0.2265 3.0456 0.0456 0.1937
5 1.5729 0.0729 0.2982 2.5830 0.0830 0.4288
250 2 1.5391 0.0391 0.3064 2.0524 0.0524 0.3855
a 1.0018 0.0018 0.1615 1.0011 0.0011 0.1426
9 2.0280 0.0280 0.1695 3.0313 0.0313 0.1479
5 1.5153 0.0153 0.1928 2.5129 0.0129 0.2808
500 2 1.5269 0.0269 0.2273 2.0285 0.0285 0.2806
a 1.0004 0.0004 0.1024 1.0002 0.0002 0.0983
9 2.0284 0.0284 0.1306 3.0251 0.0251 0.1162
5 1.5034 0.0034 0.1372 2.5062 0.0062 0.2051
1000 2 1.5215 0.0215 0.1693 2.0275 0.0275 0.2059
a 9 8
1.0001 0.0001 0.0729 1.0000 2.0182 0.0182 0.1014 3.0206 1.5012 0.0012 0.1005 2.5013
0.0000 0.0693 0.0206 0.0868 0.0013 0.1446
The presented table demonstrates that the biases and RMSE values converge towards zero. As the sample size increases, the estimations approach the original (true) values, indicating the efficiency and reliability of the estimates.
VI. Applications to Real Data
We fit the TIHLEtF distribution to two real data sets and give a comparative study with the fits to the Exponentiated Half-Logistic Frechet (EHLF) distribution by [6], Kumaraswamy Exponentiated Frechet (KExF) distribution by [8], Gompertz Frechet (GoFr) distribution by [18], Exponentiated Frechet (ExFr) distribution by [16], and Frechet distribution by [10] as comparator distributions for illustrative purposes.
The EHLF distribution by [6]
f (x;a,A,9, J) = 2aA9J9x -
1 - eL
A-1
1 -
1-e
1 +
1 - eL
- (a+l)
The KExF distribution by [8]
f (x; a, a, A, 9, J) = aAaJ9Ax- (1+A)e
(9)a
■ -(9)a " a-1 r n a
1 - -(9)a
1 - e x 1 - e x
a-1
1- a a
■ -(9)a " 1 - e x
1 - 1 -
J-l
The GoFr distribution by [18]
f (x;a,A,9, J) = 9(Ja'Vj-J The ExFr distribution by [16]
-(-)J
-(-)J
f " {-(-A -a"
A-1 9 1- 1-eL (x J
A
v
f (x; a, A, a) = aAaA
1 - e
- (f)A
x-(1+A)e^-(*
The Fr distribution by [10]
-(-f
f (x; 9, a) = 89ax~a-1e x
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
The two datasets used to illustrate the application offer practical proof of the adaptability and appropriateness of the new proposed distribution. This distribution is shown to be the optimal
9
9
J
(9+1) „ ^x
^ » T, n nT ^ » w 1 T., RT&A, No 3 (79) O A. Bello, SI Doguwa, A. Yahaya, H M. Jibril Volume 19 S 'ber 2024 On the Flexibility of TIHLEtF Distribution_Volume l9, September 2024
selection for modeling the datasets, distinct from the comparator distributions mentioned earlier.
All calculations were conducted using the R programming language.
Data set 1
The first data set shown below represents the strength of carbon fibers tested under tension at gauge lengths of 10mm, previously used by [5]:
1.901, 2.132, 2.203, 2.228, 2.257, 2.350, 2.361, 2.396, 2.397, 2.445, 2.454, 2.474, 2.518, 2.522, 2.525, 2.532, 2.575, 2.614, 2.616, 2.618, 2.624, 2.659, 2.675, 2.738, 2.740, 2.856, 2.917, 2.928, 2.937, 2.937, 2.977, 2.996, 3.030, 3.125, 3.139, 3.145, 3.220, 3.223, 3.235, 3.243, 3.264, 3.272, 3.294, 3.332, 3.346, 3.377, 3.408, 3.435, 3.493, 3.501, 3.537, 3.554, 3.562, 3.628, 3.852, 3.871, 3.886, 3.971, 4.024, 4.027, 4.225, 4.395, 5.020.
1-1-1-1
2 3 4 5
Data
Figure 3: Fitted pdfs for the TIHLEtF, EHLF, KExF, GoFr, ExFr and Fr distributions to the data set 1
Table 2: The MLEs, log-likelihoods, and goodness of fit statistics of the models are based on the strength of carbon fibers tested under tension at gauge lengths of 10 mm (Data set 1).
Distributions a 2 9 5 P LL AIC
TIHLEtF 1.2456 3.7093 3.0756 3.1438 -56.4277 120.8555
EHLF 22.4675 0.2832 19.1580 1.3491 -58.9236 125.8472
KExF 2.4724 3.7429 2.0495 9.6236 0.4923 -60.2204 130.4407
GoFr 5.3750 2.7756 3.3750 6.3750 -67.2387 142.4774
ExFr 0.7937 5.8763 2.6529 -69.9499 145.8998
Fr 2.7215 5.4345 -79.5116 155.0232
^ » ^ 11 c t t~\ » w 1 IT1, T., ., RT&A, No 3 (79)
OA Bello SI D°guwa A. Yahaya, H.M. Jibri1 Volume 19 September 2024
On the Flexibility of TIHLEtF Distribution_VOlUme 19 September 2U24
Maximum likelihood was employed to estimate the parameters of both the newly developed distribution and five other comparable distributions. The outcomes are presented in Table 2. Extremely, the newly proposed distribution exhibited the lowest AIC value based on the goodness of fit measure, closely followed by EHLF. Furthermore, the superiority of the proposed distribution over its competitors is reinforced by visually assessing the fit, as illustrated in Figure 3. This underscores the fact that the newly recommended distribution is the most appropriate choice for accurately representing the carbon fiber dataset among the mentioned distributions.
Data set 2
The second data set shown below represents the survival times of one hundred and twenty-one (121) patients with breast cancer obtained from a large hospital in a period from 1929 to 1938, previously used by [19]:
0.3, 0.3, 4.0, 5.0, 5.6, 6.2, 6.3, 6.6, 6.8, 7.4, 7.5, 8.4, 8.4, 10.3, 11.0, 11.8, 12.2, 12.3, 13.5, 14.4, 14.4, 14.8, 15.5, 15.7, 16.2, 16.3, 16.5, 16.8, 17.2, 17.3, 17.5, 17.9, 19.8, 20.4, 20.9, 21.0, 21.0, 21.1, 23.0, 23.4, 23.6, 24.0, 24.0, 27.9, 28.2, 29.1, 30.0, 31.0, 1.0, 32.0, 35.0, 35.0, 37.0, 37.0, 37.0, 38.0, 38.0, 38.0, 39.0, 39.0, 40.0, 40.0, 40.0, 41.0, 41.0, 41.0, 42.0, 43.0, 43.0, 43.0, 44.0, 45.0, 45.0, 46.0, 46.0, 47.0, 48.0, 49.0, 51.0, 51.0, 51.0, 52.0, 54.0, 55.0, 56.0, 57.0, 58.0, 59.0, 60.0, 60.0, 60.0, 61.0, 62.0, 65.0, 65.0, 67.0, 67.0, 68.0, 69.0, 78.0, 80.0, 83.0, 88.0, 89.0, 90.0, 93.0, 96.0, 103.0, 105.0, 109.0, 109.0, 111.0, 115.0, 117.0, 125.0, 126.0,127.0,129.0,129.0,139.0,154.0.
Figure 4: Fitted pdfs for the TIHLEtF, EHLF, KExF, GoFr, ExFr and Fr distributions to the data set 2
Table 3: The MLEs, log-likelihoods, and goodness of fit statistics of the models based on the survival time of patients
with breast cancer (Data 2).
Distributions a À 0 S ß LL AIC
TIHLEtF 4.6372 6.6628 3.7129 0.4224 - 599.0163 1206.033
EHLF 6.0551 0.1075 5.2159 0.1429 - 644.6529 1297.306
KExF 0.0343 5.5835 0.2036 5.9722 13.1474 - 619.2298 1248.46
GoFr 41.0479 59.0871 0.2511 0.5019 -1311.34 2630.68
ExFr 1.3538 0.6216 18.0606 - 632.1718 1270.344
Fr 16.8934 0.6524 -695.0586 1394.117
^ » T, n nT ^ » w 1 T., RT&A, No 3 (79)
O A. Bello, SL Doguwa, A. Yahaya, H.M. Jibril Volume 19 S 'bex 2024
On the Flexibility of TIHLEtF Distribution_V°lume l9, September 2024
The parameters of the TIHLEtF distribution and five similar distributions were estimated using the maximum likelihood method, and the outcomes are detailed in Table 3. It's worth highlighting that the new distribution displayed the lowest AIC value when compared to the other options, which signifies that it is the most appropriate choice for modeling the survival time of patients with breast cancer based on the goodness of fit measure AIC. Additionally, a visual examination of the fit, as illustrated in Figure 4, reinforces the idea that the new distribution outperforms its rivals.
VII. CONCLUSION
In our research, we have introduced and explored a novel statistical distribution known as the Type I Half-Logistic Exponentiated Frechet Distribution, building upon the distribution family introduced by [4]. This study delved into various statistical aspects of this newly introduced distribution. These aspects encompassed explicit quantile functions, probability-weighted moments, moments, moments generating functions, reliability functions, hazard functions, and order statistics. For parameter estimation, we utilized the maximum likelihood method. Our analysis also included simulations to assess the effectiveness of this newly proposed distribution. To underscore the significance and versatility of this innovative distribution, we compared it with well-established models using two authentic datasets. The outcomes of our investigation underscore the superiority of the new distribution in comparison to the other models under consideration. This implies that the proposed distribution shows promise for effectively modeling data across various applications.
References
[1] Afify, A. Z., Hamedani, G. G., Ghosh, I. & Mead, M. E. (2015). The transmuted Marshall-Olkin Frechet distribution: properties and applications. International Journal of Statistics and Probability, 4, 132-184.
[2] Afify, A. Z., Yousof, H. M., Cordeiro, G. M., M. Ortega, E. M., & Nofal, Z. M. (2016). The Weibull Frechet distribution and its applications. Journal of Applied Statistics, 43(14), 2608-2626.
[3] Afify, A. Z., Yousof, H. M., Cordeiro, G. M., Nofal, Z. M., & Ahmad, M. (2016). The Kumaraswamy Marshall Olkin Frechet Distribution with Applications. Journal of ISOSS, 2(2), 151-168.
[4] Bello, O. A., Doguwa, S. I., Yahaya, A., & Jibril, H. M. (2021). A Type I Half Logistic Exponentiated-G Family of Distributions: Properties and Application. Communication in Physical Sciences, 7(3).
[5] Bi, Q., & Gui, W. (2017). Bayesian and classical estimation of stress-strength reliability for inverse Weibull lifetime models. Algorithms, 10(2), 71.
[6] Cordeiro, G. M., Alizadeh, M. & Ortega, E. M. M. (2014a). The exponentiated half logistic family of distributions: Properties and applications. Journal of Probability and Statistics, 1-21.
[7] Da Silva, R. V., de Andrade, T. A., Maciel, D. B., Campos, R. P., & Cordeiro, G. M. (2013). A New Lifetime Model: The Gamma Extended Frechet Distribution. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 12(1), 39-54.
[8] Diab, L. S., & Elbatal, I. (2016). A new generalization of exponentiated Frechet distribution. International Journal of Reliability and Applications, 17(1), 65-84.
[9] Elbatal, I., Asha, G., & Raja, A. V. (2014). Transmuted exponentiated Frechet distribution: properties and applications. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 3(3), 379.
[10] Frechet, M. (1924). Sur la Loi des Erreurs d'Observation. Bulletin de la Soci et e Math ematique de Moscou, 33(1), 5-8.
[11] Greenwood, J. A., Landwehr, J. M., Matalas, N. C., & Wallis, J. R. (1979). Probability weighted moments: definition and relation to parameters of several distributions expressable in inverse form. Water resources research, 15(5), 1049-1054.
^ » T, 11 t t~\ » w 1 IT1, T., ., RT&A, No 3 (79)
O.A. Bello, S.I. Doguwa, A. Yahaya, H.M. Jibril Volume 19 S mber 2024
On the Flexibility of TIHLEtF Distribution_V°lume 19, September 2U24
[12] Krishna, E., Jose, K. K., Alice, T., & Ristic, M. M. (2013). The Marshall-Olkin Frechet distribution. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 42(22), 4091-4107.
[13] Mahmoud, M. R., & Mandouh, R. M. (2013). On the transmuted Frechet distribution. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 9(10), 5553-5561.
[14] Mead, M. E. & Abd-Eltawab A. R. (2014). A note on Kumaraswamy Frechet distribution. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8, 294-300.
[15] Mead, M. E., Afify, A. Z., Hamedani, G. G., & Ghosh, I. (2017). The beta exponential Frechet distribution with applications. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 46(1), 41-63.
[16] Nadaraja, S., & Kotz, S. (2003). The Exponentiated Frechet distribution, Interstat Electronic Journal, 1-7.
[17] Nadarajah, S., & Gupta, A. K. (2004). The beta Frechet distribution. Fareast journal of theoretical statistics, 14(1), 15-24.
[18] Oguntunde, P. E., Khaleel, M. A., Ahmed, M. T., & Okagbue, H. I. (2019). The Gompertz Frechet Distribution: Properties and Applications. Cogent Mathematics & Statistics, 6(1), 1568662.
[19] Ramos, M.W. A., Marinho, P. R. D., Da Silva, R. V., & Cordeiro, G. M. (2013).The exponentiated Lomax Poisson distribution with an application to lifetime data. Advances and Applications in Statistics, 34(2), 107-135.