NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS OF THE DUAL NULL FIELD METHOD FOR DIRICHLET PROBLEMS OF LAPLACE’S EQUATION IN ELLIPTIC DOMAINS WITH ELLIPTIC HOLES Текст научной статьи по специальности «Математика»

% 1И..1..й11?

2022. Т. 39. С. 80—95

Онлайн-доступ к журналу: http://mathizv.isu.ru

Серия «Математика»

Research article

УДК 519.63 MSC 65M38

DOI https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2022.39.80

Numerical Experiments of the Dual Null Field Method for Dirichlet Problems of Laplace's Equation in Elliptic Domains with Elliptic Holes

Zi-CaiLi1, Hung-Tsai Huang2, Li-Ping Zhang3, Anna A. Lempert4, Ming-Gong Lee5H

1 National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

2 I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

3 Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China

4 Matrosov Institute for System Dynamics and Control Theory SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russian Federation

5 Chung Hua University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan И [email protected]

Abstract. Dual techniques have been used in many engineering papers to deal with singularity and ill-conditioning of the boundary element method (BEM). In the first part of the two-part article, our efforts were focused on studying the theoretical aspects of this problem, including the analysis of errors and the study of stability. We provided the theoretical analysis for Laplace equation in elliptic domains with elliptic holes. To bypass the degenerate scales of Dirichlet problems, the second and the first kinds of the null field methods (NFM) are used for the exterior and the interior boundaries, simultaneously. This approach is called the dual null field method (DNFM).

This paper is the second part of the study. Numerical results for degenerate models of an elliptic domain with one elliptic hole at a + b = 2 are carried out to verify the theoretical analysis obtained. The collocation TTefftz method (CTM) is also designed for comparisons. Both the DNFM and the CTM can provide excellent numerical performances. The convergence rates are the same but the stability of CTM is excellent and can achieve the constant condition numbers, Cond = O(l).

Keywords: boundary element method, degenerate scales, elliptic domains, dual null field method, collocation Trefftz methods, condition number

Acknowledgements: The reported study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Grant 109-2923-E-216-001-MY3 and RFBR, research project 20-51-S52003.

For citation: LiZ.C., HuangH.T., ZhangL.P., LempertA. A., LeeM. G.Numerical Experiments of the Dual Null Field Method for Dirichlet Problems of Laplace's Equation in Elliptic Domains with Elliptic Holes. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 2022, vol. 39, pp. 80-95. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2022.39.80

Научная статья

Численные эксперименты двойственным методом нулевого поля в задаче Дирихле для уравнения Лапласа в эллиптических областях с эллиптическими отверстиями

З. К. Ли1, Х.Ц.Хуанг2, Л.П.Жанг3, А. А. Лемперт4, М.Г.Ли5и

1 Государственный университет имени Сунь Ятсена, Гаосюн, Тайвань

2 Университет Ишоу, Гаосюн, Тайвань

3 Чжэцзянский технологический университет, Ханчжоу, Китай

4 Институт динамики систем и теории управления имени В. М. Матросова СО РАН, Иркутск, Российская Федерация

5 Университет Чунг Хуа, Синьчжу, Тайвань И [email protected]

Аннотация. Двойственные методы часто используются для решения проблемы сингулярности и плохой обусловленности метода граничных элементов (МГЭ). В первой части работы изучаются теоретические аспекты данной проблемы, включая анализ ошибок и исследование устойчивости. Так, авторами был выполнен анализ уравнения Лапласа в эллиптических областях с эллиптическими отверстиями. Для того чтобы преодолеть алгоритмическую сингулярность (degenerate scale problem) в задаче Дирихле, второй и первый виды МНП использовались для внешних и внутренних границ одновременно. Данный подход мы назвали методом двойственного нулевого поля (ДМНП).

Настоящая статья является второй частью исследования. Здесь представлены результаты вычислительных экспериментов для вырожденных моделей эллиптической области с одним эллиптическим отверстием при а + b = 2 для проверки полученного теоретического анализа. Также для сравнения результатов разработан метод на основе коллокации Треффца (CTM). И DNFM, и CTM показывают отличные результаты. Их скорость сходимости одинакова, при этом устойчивость CTM превосходна и позволяет достичь постоянных чисел обусловленности, Cond = 0(1).

Ключевые слова: метод граничных элементов, вырожденные шкалы, эллиптическая область, двойственный метод нулевого поля, метод коллокации Треффца, число обусловленности

Благодарности: Работа выполнена при частичной финансовой поддержке Министерства науки и технологии Тайваня (грант 109-2923-E-216-001-MY3) и РФФИ (проект 20-51-S52003).

Ссылка для цитирования: LiZ.C., HuangH.T., ZhangL.P., LempertA. A., LeeM. G. Numerical Experiments of the Dual Null Field Method for Dirichlet Problems of Laplace's Equation in Elliptic Domains with Elliptic Holes // Известия Иркутского государственного университета. Серия Математика. 2022. Т. 39. C. 80-95. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2022.39.80

1. Introduction

Dual techniques have been used in many engineering papers (see [1-3; 14]) to deal with singularity and ill-conditioning of the boundary element method (BEM). Our efforts are paid to explore theoretical analysis to fill up the gap between theory and computation. Our group provides the analysis for Laplace equation in circular domains with circular holes in [9] and elliptic domains with elliptic holes ( [12]) in [10]. When the field nodes are located on the exterior elliptic boundary, the degenerate scales of algorithm singularity occurs at a + b = 2 [5], where a and b are two semi-axes of the exterior ellipse. It is too complicated to find all pitfall nodes of the null field method (NFM) causing algorithm singularity, as done in [5]. However, when the field nodes are confined on the same ellipses, the degenerate scales may be bypassed, see [10].

To guarantee the non-singularity of coefficient matrices obtained, other numerical algorithms should be solicited. In [1], a self-regularized method is proposed in the matrix level to deal with non-unique solutions of the Neumann and Dirichlet problems which contain rigid body mode and degenerate scale, respectively. In [3], they have examined the sufficient and necessary condition of boundary integral formulation for the uniqueness solution of 2D Laplace problem subject to the Dirichlet boundary condition by five regularization techniques, namely hypersingular formulation, method of adding a rigid body mode, rank promotion by adding the boundary flux equilibrium (direct BEM), CHEEF method and the Fichera's method (indirect BEM). In [4], they revisited the problem of an infinite plane with two identical circular holes by using the complex variables instead of using the degenerate kernel. The complex variables provide another way to solve these problems and it was easier than the degenerate kernel to understand. They have analytically derived the degenerate scale and compare the result with that of the degenerate kernel, and the equivalence is also proved.

The error analysis of the DNFM is made for elliptic domains with one elliptic hole to reach the optimal convergent rates and the bounds of condition numbers of the DNFM of a simple case are derived to display good stability in [10]. More important results are given in this paper. The dual null field method (DNFM) is studied to present numerical experiments for Laplace's equations with elliptic domain with elliptic holes to avoid the algorithm singularity. Numerical results for degenerate models at a + b = 2 are carried out to verify the theoretical analysis made in [10]. Besides, the collocation Trefftz method (CTM) in [8] is also designed for comparisons. Both the dual null field method and the CTM can provide excellent numerical performances. The CTM offers the constant condition numbers, but the dual null field method may link the BEM and the original

NFM for arbitrary solution domains, where the original NFM denotes the algorithms using piecewise polynomials as those in the BEM, instead of the semi-analytic solutions in this paper. This paper with [9] and [10] may shorten some gap between computation and theory of the dual null field method (DNFM).

This paper is organized as follows. In the next section, for elliptic domains with one elliptic hole, the dual null field method (DNFM) are described, and the algorithm of the DNFM is discussed. In Section 3, the theoretical outcomes of the errors and stability are stated. In Section 4, numerical experiments of the dual techniques and the CTM are reported. In the last section, a few concluding remarks are made.

2. The Dual Null Field Method in Elliptic Domains with

Elliptic Holes

The elliptic coordinates are defined in [13] by

x = a0 cosh p cos в, у = a0 sinh p sin 0, (2.1)

where a0 > 0 and two coordinates (p, в) have the ranges: 0 < p < ж and 0 < в < 2к. More characteristics of elliptic coordinates are provided in [12]. Denote the large ellipse Sr with p = R, where the elliptic coordinates (р,в) are given by (2.1) with the origin (0,0). Also denote a small ellipse Srx С Sr with p = Ei, where the other (i.e., local) elliptic coordinates (p, в) are given by

x = a1 cosh pcos 0, y = a1 sinh psin 0, (2.2)

where a1 > 0. This Cartesian system (x,y) with the origin (x1,y1) is rotated from the axis X, by a counter-clockwise angle в as in Figure 1.

Figure 1. The ellipse Sr with an elliptic hole Sr1 .

The coordinate transformations between (p, 9) and (p, d) are given in (2.10) and (2.14) below.

Denote the annular domain by S = Sr \ Sr1 , and its boundary by dS = OSr U OSr1 . In this paper, consider the Dirichlet problem only,

d2u d2u n . „.

= w + w = 0in * (2-3)

u = f on OSr, u = g on OSr1 , (2.4)

where f and g are the known functions. On the exterior elliptic boundary OSr, suppose that there exist approximations of series expansions (see [12]),

M

u

k=l

M

f œ a0 + ^[au cos kff + bk sin кв} on 8Sr, (2.5)

= /* ~—^T ¡Pô + ^[Pk cos кв + qk sin kff}} on dSR, (2.6)

OU &oTo(u) I f—' J

fc=l

where ,bk,Pk and qk are coefficients, and ro(ff) = a/sinh2 E + sin2 ff. On the interior elliptic boundary 8Sr1 , similarly

N k=l

( N

g œ a0 + ^[ak cos кв + bk sin кв} on DSr1 (2.7)

k=l

du du 1

Po + ^[pk cos кв + qk sin kff}\ on DSr1 , (2.8)

dv dp a\T\ (ff) ^ k=1 j

where ak, bk,Pk and qk are coefficients, and r1(d) = \/sinh2 R1 + sin2 ff. For the Dirichlet problem, the coefficients ak and bk in (2.5) and ak and bk in

(2.7) are known, but the coefficients pk and qk in (2.6) and pk and qk in

(2.8) are unknown to be sought.

For the numerical computation of explicit algebraic equations, the coordinate transformations between different elliptic coordinates are needed. In general, the axes of the small ellipse are not along the X and Y axes. The local Cartesian coordinates X'O'Y' are located from the standard Cartesian coordinates XOY by rotating a counter-clockwise angle 0 e [0,^), see Figure 1. There exist the relations of coordinates,

(x' \ = ( cose sineN ( x\ (x \ = (cose — sineN ix' \ \y'J V — sin e cos e J \y J , \y ) lysine cos e J \y'J '

Denote the local elliptic coordinates (p, ff) in X'O'Y' as

X = a1 cosh p cos ff, y = a1 sinh p sin ff, (2.9)

where a1 > 0. We cite from [12] the explicit formulas of the transformations between two different elliptic coordinates. The transformation from (p, ff)

of (2.1) to (p, 9) of (2.2) is given by

T : {(p, 9) ^ (p,9)}, (2.10)

where

p = sinh-1(F (x, max)), 0 = cos-1(-), (2.11)

a1 cosh p

where the function F(x, y; a) is defined as

F(x, y-a) = ~^J(x2 + y2 - a2) + ^^+ y2 — a2)2 + 4^, (2.12) 2a

and the coordinates are

x\ = / cos 0 sin 0 \ / a cosh p cos 9 — x1 \ (213) y J y — sin 0 cos 0 y y a sinh p sin 9 — y1 J ' (. )

The inverse transformation from (p, 9) to (p, 9) is given by

T-1 : {(p,9) ^ (p, 9)}, (2.14)

where

x

p = sinh-1(F (x,y;a)), 6> = cos-1(-—), (2.15)

a cosh p

and

( ^ = f cos в — sine\ / a1 cosh p cos ^ ^ + / ^ ^ (2 16) \y J у sin в cos в J у a1 sinh p sin 9 J у y1 J ' (. )

2.1. The dull null field methods (DNFM)

From [10], we have derived the dual null field method with explicit algebraic equations and are given below,

д

—Cext(p, 9;p, 9) (2.17)

1 M

=-—т- \ > ke-kp(ak sinh kR cos k9 + bk cosh kR sin к9)

&оТо(p, в) I k=1

M

—P° — ^ e-kp(pk cosh kR cos k9 + qk sinh kR sin i k=1

1 N --- \ cos(r? — Щ)р0 + > ke-kp{ak sinh kR1 cos[k9 — rj + fj]

(P, k==1

N

+bk cosh kR1 sin[k0 — •q + fj]} + ^ e-kp{pk cosh kR1 cos[k9 — щ + Щ]

k=1

+qk sinh kR1 sin[k0 — rj + ^]}\ =0, p > R,p > R1,

and

Cmt(p, 9; p, 9) = — [R + ln(^)]Po (2.18)

m 1 ^

+ > —e kR{Pk cosh A; p cos k9 + q^ sinh kp sin k9} k=l

N i

[R + ln(—)]p0 + ^ te-kRl {pk coshkp cos k9 + qk sinh kp sin fa9} 2 fa k=l

M

+a0 + ^ e kR[ak coshkp cos k9 + bk sinh kp sin к 9} к=1

N

—a0 — ^ e-kRl [йк coshkp cos k9 + bk sinh kp sink 9} = 0, p < R\.

k=l

2.2. Algorithms of Dual Null Field Method

Denote the explicit equations (2.17) and (2.18) by

Vext(p, 9; p, 9) = 0, Cmt(p, 9;p, 9) = 0. (2.19)

Choose the uniform nodes on the same ellipses,

(p, 9) = (R + e, jA 9), j = 0,1,..., 2M, (2.20)

(p, 0) = (R — e, jA 9), j = 0,1,..., 2N, (2.21)

where e > 0, 0 < e < Ri, A9 = ^and A9 = ^^r+i. We obtain 2(M + N) + 2 collocation equations of the NFM,

M Vext(R + e, jA9; pj, 9j) = M f(jA9), j = 0,1,..., 2M, (2.22) s/WjCint(pj, 9j; R — ё, jA9) = O'A0), j = 0,1,..., 2N, (2.23)

where the corresponding coordinates (pj, 9j) and (pj, 9j) can be evaluated from (R+e, jA9) and (R — e, jA9), based on the coordinate transformations (2.10) and (2.14). The wights w0 = 1 and wj = 2 for j > 1. By following [8], Eqs. (2.22) and (2.23) are called the collocation Trefftz method (CTm). Eqs. (2.22) and (2.23) lead to the following linear equations,

Ax = b, (2.24)

where the matrix A e Rnxn, the vector x(e Rn) = [p0,pk, Qk, p0,pk, Qk]T and n = 2(M+N)+2. The unknown coefficients can be obtained by solving (2.24) if matrix A is nonsingular. When p = R and p = Ri, 6 = 6 = 0,

and the collocation equations of the NFM lead to those of the interior field method (IFM) [6].

2.3. Removal of Algorithm Singularity

Let us discuss the degenerate scales of the DNFM. We have a proposition without proof, see [10].

Proposition 1. For Laplace's equation in elliptic domains with one elliptic hole, when a + 6 = 2, there do not exist degenerate scales of the DNFM. When a + 6 = 2, the statement is true if constant p (> R) and not small M are chosen.

3. Analysis of Errors and Stability

3.1. Error Bounds

We have explored in [10] the analysis for elliptic domains with one elliptic hole, and here we just present their convergence and stability outcomes for

reference. _

Define the norm ||t>||0 = ^Ju2 jdSR v^ds + J9Sr v2ds, we have the following theorem.

Theorem 1. Suppose u e HP(dSR), uu e HP-l(dSR) (p > 2), u e Ha(9SRl) and uu G Ha-l(dSRl) (a > 2), and the exact coefficients of the Dirichlet conditions in (2.5) and (2.7) be given. Then the solutions from, the DNFM (2.17) and (2.18) have the following bound,

||u - uM-N ||o,r ^ C{~MP (llullP>dSR + llu» ||P-l.SSB ) (3.1)

+J^ (||u|kasBl + hvL-^as^ ^.

We choose p = R and p = Rl. For simplicity, consider the simple case: (1) the symmetric cases qk = qk = 0 and M = N, and (2) the same elliptic coordinates with (p, 0) = (p, d) are used, i.e., ao = al,xl = yl = 0, 6 = 0 and = . We have a theorem about the condition number of the simple case.

Theorem 2. Under the simple case of elliptic domains with one elliptic hole, for the DNFM (2.22) and (2.23) ate = ê = 0, there exist the bounds,

Cond(A)=0(M ). (3.2)

4. Numerical Experiments 4.1. Two Computed Models

Consider a large elliptic domain with a small elliptic hole, as shown in Figure 2. The large ellipse is defined by a = 2.5, 6 = 2, a0 = Va2 — b2 = 1.5 and

x = a0 coshR cos в, у = a0 sinhR sin в.

(4.1)

From tanhR = ^ = 225 = 0.8, we have R = 1.0986. The small ellipse is

2

= R

Р = Ri р \

/ё \ Л®

1-2 -1 / O 2.5

-2

Figure 2. Model Problem on the ellipse Sr with an elliptic hole Sr1 .

defined by a = 1,5 = 2, and ai = Va2 — b2 = ^, where the local elliptic coordinates with origin (—1,0) are given by

x = ai cosh R cos 0 — 1, у = ai sinh R sin 0.

(4.2)

For simplicity in computation, the long axis of the small ellipse is chosen along semiaxis X with 0 = 0. From tanhR = 2, we have R = 0.5493. The Dirichlet condition is given by

и = a0 = 1 on OSr, и = a0 = 0 on 0Sr1 .

(4.3)

Such a problem is called Model Problem in this paper.

We design Degenerate Model as follows. The exterior large ellipse OSr with a + b = 2 as in Figure 3. Choose a0 = 1.5, and obtain from (2.1)

R = ln = ln — = 3.79367, ao ao

a = ao cosh R = 1.5625, 6 = 2 — a = 0.4375.

(4.4)

X

Choose the interior ellipse dSrx with origin (—0.5,0) and (a, b) = (0.5,0.1). We have from (2.9)

tanhRl = -, Rl = 0.2040, al = V a2 - b2 = 0.4899. (4.5) 5

When the Dirichlet condition is also given by (4.3), Degenerate Model is called in this paper.

Figure 3. Degenerate Model on the ellipse Sr at a + b = 2 with an elliptic hole Sr1 .

4.2. By the Dual Null Field Method The interior solutions are given, see [10].

um-n(p, 0; p, 0) = ao - [R + ln(y )]po - [p + ln(y )]po (4.6)

m N _

+ ^ pke-kR cosh kp coskff + ^ ^e-kp coshkR1 cos A:ff, in

k=1

k=1

Two explicit equations of the DNFM are obtained from (2.17) and (2.18)

d

-^—Cext(p, 0;p, ff) :=-T—^ { - Po - ^ Pke kp cosh kR cos kd

du aoTo (p, 9)1

m

T

N

arn(p, 0)

p >R,

I cos(r — ri)p0 + ^pke kpcoshkR1 cos(kff — r + r)} =0,

(4.7)

k=1

and

ao

,ai.

Uni(p, ff; p, ff) := ao — ao — [R + ln(—)]po — [Ri + ln(— )]po

2

2

(4.8)

m N _

+ ^ p:e~kR coshkp coskff + ^ Pie-kRi coshkp coskff = 0, p <RX.

k=1

k=1

The (N + M + 2) collocation equations with p = R, p = R are chosen as

1 д -

Cext (R,jM] Pj, 6j)=0, j = 0,1,-,M, (4.9)

V^j^nt(pj, 6j;Ri, jA6) = 0, j = 0,1,..., N, (4.10)

where weights w0 = 1 and Wj = 2(j > 1). Eqs. (4.9) and (4.10) are expressed by Ax = b, where A e Rnxn, x e Rn,n = M+N+2. The condition number and the effective condition number are defined in [7] by Cond = and Cond_eff = —.., where amax and amin are the maximal and the

^min ^"min || x||

minimal singular values of matrix A, respectively, and ||x|| is the 2-norm of vector x. We compute the errors, |MU,asfl, INU,asfll, INIo,asfl, INIo,asfll

and the norm HerHfc = ^^¡S^+HUsv

For Model Problem, Table 1 shows the errors and the condition numbers.

Table 1

Errors and condition numbers of Model Problem by the DNFM, where

£ = U — UM-N.

м llel|o,0SR ||e||o,ssRl NU ||e|U,SSR Cond Cond_eff

6 1.270E-02 4.977E-03 1.364E-02 1.394E-02 5.461E-03 15.97 8.72

12 3.665E-04 2.847E-04 4.640E-04 4.643E-04 3.384E-04 29.97 16.66

18 1.733E-05 1.629E-05 2.378E-05 2.145E-05 2.006E-05 43.94 24.55

24 9.649E-07 1.036E-06 1.416E-06 1.184E-06 1.294E-06 57.91 32.42

30 5.870E-08 7.040E-08 9.166E-08 7.184E-08 8.873E-08 71.87 40.28

From Table 1, there exist the asymptotes,

IHU = 0(0.62м), \\e\Uasn = 0(0.62M), \НЦ^Й1 = 0(0.63M), (4.11) Cond = 0(M), Cond_eff = 0(M). (4.12)

For Degenerate Model, when M = 20, the errors and the condition numbers are listed in Table 2 for different N. It can be seen the compatible maximal errors on two boundaries are found as N = 5. Hence in computation, we choose the ratios (M : N) = (4 : 1). The errors and the condition numbers are listed in Table 3.

From Table 3, there exist the asymptotes,

IHU = 0(0.69м), IHI^as* = 0(0.69м), \HU,Ssfll = 0(0.69M), (4.13) Cond = 0(M), Cond_eff = 0(M). (4.14)

Eqs. (4.11)-(4.14) coincide with the error and stability analysis in Section 3. In particular, by the DNFM not only can the algorithm singularity be bypassed, but also the good stability as Cond = 0(M) may be achieved.

Table 2

Errors and condition numbers of Degenerate Model by the DNFM at M = 20.

N llel|o,ÖSR ||e||0,ÖSRl NU ||e|U,öSR Cond Cond_eff

3 1.83E-04 1.39E-03 1.40E-03 1.74E-04 2.50E-03 42.26 10.94

4 1.83E-04 1.95E-04 2.67E-04 1.75E-04 4.59E-04 48.10 12.50

5 1.83E-04 1.05E-04 2.11E-04 1.75E-04 1.78E-04 53.32 13.88

8 1.83E-04 1.74E-06 1.83E-04 1.75E-04 2.68E-06 66.58 17.39

10 1.83E-04 2.25E-08 1.83E-04 1.75E-04 3.11E-08 74.11 19.38

12 1.83E-04 4.45E-09 1.83E-04 1.75E-04 8.16E-09 80.95 21.18

15 1.83E-04 3.92E-11 1.83E-04 1.75E-04 6.90E-11 90.24 23.63

20 1.83E-04 3.47E-15 1.83E-04 1.75E-04 1.49E-14 103.90 27.22

Table 3

Errors and condition numbers for Degenerate Model by the DNFM with

(M : N) = (4 : 1).

M |e|0,ÖSR |e|o,ösRl NU ||e|U,öSR |e|TC,ösRl Cond Cond_eff

12 3.55E-03 1.51E-03 3.85E-03 3.66E-03 2.55E-03 33.04 8.51

16 6.09E-04 1.85E-04 6.37E-04 6.23E-04 4.42E-04 43.15 11.20

20 1.83E-04 1.05E-04 2.11E-04 1.75E-04 1.78E-04 53.32 13.88

24 2.90E-05 2.83E-05 4.05E-05 3.02E-05 3.38E-05 63.50 16.57

28 1.19E-05 3.09E-06 1.23E-05 1.09E-05 7.24E-06 73.69 19.25

32 1.54E-06 1.58E-06 2.21E-06 1.68E-06 2.78E-06 83.87 21.93

36 8.17E-07 3.01E-07 8.71E-07 6.95E-07 4.92E-07 94.04 24.61

40 9.65E-08 8.10E-08 1.26E-07 1.05E-07 1.04E-07 104.22 27.29

4.3. Degenerate Model by the CTM

We may use the following particular solutions (PS) from [12],

uM-N = uM-N(p, ff;p, ff)=«o + aop (4.15)

M

+ y^ e-kR{ak cosh kp cos kff + ßk sinh kp sin kff } k=1

N

+ y^ e-kp{ak cosh kR1 cos kff + ßk sinh kR1 sin kff}, k=1

where ak,ak and are the coefficients. For the simple case, the solutions (4.15) are simplified as

uM-MN = uM-MN(p, 0; p, d) = ao + aop (4.16)

M N

+ y^ ake~kR cosh kp cos kd + y^ ake~kp cosh kRl cos kd. k=l k=l

Compared (4.16) with (4.6), we find the relations of coefficients, ao = -po, ao = ao - [R + ln(y)]po - ln(y)po,

ak = ^Pk, ak = kpk. (4.17) From the Dirichlet condition (4.3), we have

uMM (R, 0;p, 0)=ao + aop (4.18)

M N

+ y^ake_kR cosh kR cos kd + s^2/ake~kp cosh kR cos kd = 1, k=1 k=1 uMT-MN(p, 0;Ru 0) = ao + ao Ri (4.19)

M N

+ ak k R cosh cos k + ak k R cosh k R cos = 0. k=1 k=1

The corresponding collocation equations at the nodes in (4.9) and (4.10) can be obtained. For Degenerate Model, the errors and the condition numbers are listed in Table 4.

Table 4

Errors and condition numbers of Degenerate Model by the CTM for (M : N) = (4:1).

M llello,esR ||e||o,esRl NU ||e|U,esR Cond Cond_eff

12 3.13E-03 1.52E-03 3.48E-03 2.81E-03 2.58E-03 13.99 3.58

16 4.99E-04 1.88E-04 5.33E-04 4.59E-04 4.48E-04 13.95 3.59

20 1.74E-04 1.06E-04 2.03E-04 1.53E-04 1.79E-04 13.94 3.60

24 2.51E-05 2.83E-05 3.78E-05 2.46E-05 3.38E-05 13.93 3.60

28 1.14E-05 3.09E-06 1.19E-05 1.00E-05 7.24E-06 13.92 3.61

32 1.36E-06 1.58E-06 2.08E-06 1.43E-06 2.78E-06 13.91 3.61

36 7.88E-07 3.01E-07 8.43E-07 6.52E-07 4.92E-07 13.91 3.61

40 8.70E-08 8.10E-08 1.19E-07 9.42E-08 1.04E-07 13.91 3.61

From Table 4, there exist the asymptotes,

|MU = 0(0.69M), M^as* = 0(0.69M), |HU,asfll = 0(0.66M),(4.20) Cond = 0(1), Cond_eff = 0(1). (4.21)

Compared (4.20) and (4.21) with (4.13) and (4.14), the convergence rates are the same, but the stability of the CTM is excellent, because both Cond and Cond_eff remain unchangeable, when M ^ œ. Note that the coefficients from the DNFM and the CTM indeed satisfy the coefficient relations (4.17), due to limited space, we did not show the coefficients from these two methods in this paper. Both the CTM and the DNFM offer the excellent numerical performance, but the DNFM may link the BEM and the original NFM, see [11].

5. Concluding Remarks

Let us give a few remarks, to address the novelties of this paper.

1. The DNFM for Laplace's equation in circular domains with circular holes was first proposed in [9]; and the first part of the current study in [10] is devoted to the analysis of the DNFM for Laplace's equation in elliptic domains with elliptic holes. This paper with [9] and [10] may establish a theoretical foundation and numerical validation to fill up some gap between theory and computation.

2. For the degenerate case of an elliptic domain with an elliptic hole at a + b = 2 of the IFM, however, the renovated methods should be adapted. The algorithms of the DNFM are proposed in [10], and the removal of algorithm singularity is verified by the numerical experiments in Section 4.

3. Numerical experiments are carried out in Section 4, to support the theoretical analysis made in [10]. Moreover, the collocation Trefftz methods (CTM) is also used for comparisons. Both the CTM and the DNFM offer the excellent numerical performance. Although the CTM yields the excellent stability with Cond = 0(1), the DNFM may link the BEM and the original NFM for arbitrary domains, see [11].

References

1. Chen J.T., Han H., Kuo S.R., Kao S.K. Regularization for ill-conditioned systems of integral equation of first kind with logarithmic kernel. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 2014, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1176-1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2013.856900

2. Chen J.T., Hong H.K., Review of dual finite element methods with emphasis on hypersingular integrals and divergent series. Appl. Mech. Rev., 1999, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3098922

3. Chen J.T., Lee Y.T., Chang Y.L., Jian J. A self-regularized approach for rank-deficient systems in the BEM of 2D Laplace problems. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 2017, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 89-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2016.1138948

4. Kuo S.R., Kao S.K., Huang Y.L., Chen J.T. Revisit of the degenerate scale for an infinite plane problem containing two circular holes using con-

5.

6.

7.

8. 9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16. 17.

formal mapping. Applied Mathematics Letters, 2019, vol. 92, pp. 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2018.11.023

Lee M.G., Li Z.C., Zhang L.P., Huang H.T., Chiang J.Y. Algorithm singularity of the null-field method for Dirichlet problems of Laplace's equation in annular and circular domains. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 2014, vol. 41, pp. 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2014.01.013

Li Z.C., Chiang J.Y., Huang H.T., Lee M.G. The new interior field method for Laplace's equation on circular domains with circular holes. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 2016, vol. 67, pp. 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2016.03.006

Li Z.C., Huang H.T., Wei Y., Cheng A.H.-D. Effective Condition Number for Numerical Partial Differential Equations. Beijing, Science Press, 2014, 286 p. Li Z.C., Lu T.T., Hu H.Y., Cheng A.H.-D. Trefftz and Collocation Methods. Southampton, Boston, WIT press, 2008, 432 p.

Lee M.G., Zhang L.P., Li Z.C., Kazakov A.L. Dual Null Field Method for Dirichlet Problems of Laplace's Equation in Circular Domains with Circular Holes. Siberian Electronic Mathematical Reports, 2021, vol. 19(1), pp. 393-422. https://doi.org/10.33048/semi.2021.18.028

Li Z.C., Huang H.T., Zhang L.P., Lempert A.A., Lee M.G. Analysis of Dual Null Field Methods for Dirichlet Problems of Laplace's Equation in Circular Domains with Circular Holes: Bypassing the degenerate scales. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, submitted, June 2021.

Li Z.C., Zhang L.P., Lee M.G., Interior field methods for Neumann problems of Laplace's equation in elliptic domains, Comparisons with degenerate scales. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem, 2016, vol. 71, pp. 190-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2016.07.003

Li Z.C., Zhang L.P., Wei Y., Lee M.G., Chiang J.Y. Boundary methods for Dirichlet problems of Laplace's equation in elliptic domains with elliptic holes. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 2015, vol. 61, pp. 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2015.07.001

Morse P.M., Feshbach H. Methods of Theoretical Physics. New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1953, 997 p.

Portela A., Aliabadi M.H., Rooke D.P. The dual boundary element method: effective implementation for crack problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 1992, vol. 33, pp. 1269-1287. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620330611 Krnic L. Types of Bases in the Algebra of Logic. Glasnik Matematicko-Fizicki i Astronomski, series 2, 1965, vol. 20, pp. 23-32.

Lau D., Miyakawa M. Classification and enumerations of bases in Pk (2). Asian-European Journal of Mathematics, 2008, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 255-282. Miyakawa M., Rosenberg I., Stojmenovic I. Classification of Three-valued logical functions preserving 0. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 1990, vol. 28, pp. 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-218X(90)90005-W

Об авторах

Ли Зи-Кай, проф., Государственный университет имени Сунь Ятсена, Тайвань, 80424, г. Гаосюн, [email protected]

About the authors Zi-Cai Li, Prof., National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, 80424, Taiwan, [email protected]

Хуанг Хунг-Цай, профессор, Университет Ишоу, Тайвань, 84001, Гаосюн, [email protected]

Жанг Ли-Пинг, проф., Чжэцзянский технологический университет, Китай, 310023, г. Ханчжоу, [email protected]

Лемперт Анна Ананьевна, канд. физ.-мат. наук, Институт динамики систем и теории управления имени В. М. Матросова СО РАН, Российская Федерация, 664033, г. Иркутск, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9562-7903

Ли Минг-Гонг, проф., Университет Чунг Хуа, Тайвань, 30012, г. Синьчжу, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-2247

Hung-Tsai Huang, Prof., I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, 84001, Taiwan, [email protected]

Li-Ping Zhang, Prof., Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, China, [email protected]

Anna A. Lempert, Cand. Sci. (Phys.Math.), Matrosov Institute for System Dynamics and Control Theory SB RAS, Irkutsk, 664033, Russian Federation, [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9562-7903

Ming-Gong Lee, Prof., Chung Hua University, Hsin-Chu, 30012, Taiwan, [email protected],

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-2247

Поступила в 'редакцию / Received 25.10.2021 Поступила после рецензирования / Revised 23.12.2021 Принята к публикации / Accepted 17.01.2022