Научная статья на тему 'Molecular responses of groundnut ( Arachis hypogea L. ) to Zinc stress'

Molecular responses of groundnut ( Arachis hypogea L. ) to Zinc stress Текст научной статьи по специальности «Биологические науки»

CC BY
133
45
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
HEAVY METAL STRESS / ARACHIS HYPOGEA L / SDSPAGE POLYPEPTIDES / RESTRICTION ENZYMES

Аннотация научной статьи по биологическим наукам, автор научной работы — John De Britto A., Leon Stephan Raj T., Sutha M.

Heavy metals are important environmental pollutants and their toxicity is a problem of increasing significance for ecological, evolutionary and environmental reasons. The interference of germination related proteins by heavy metals has not been well documented at the proteomic and genomic level. In the current study, molecular responses of germinating groundnut seeds were investigated under Zinc stress. The SDS-PAGE showed the preliminary changes in the polypeptides patterns under Zinc stress. Restriction digestion banding pattern of EcoRI and Hind III enzymes showed distinct banding pattern in the treated plants.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Molecular responses of groundnut ( Arachis hypogea L. ) to Zinc stress»

Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, Vol. 9 No. 3 2013, pp. 152-158 ISSN 1997-0838 Original Text Copyright © 2013 by John De Britto, Leon Stephan Raj, Sutha

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Molecular Responses of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) to Zinc Stress

A. John De Britto, T. Leon Stephan Raj and M. Sutha

Post Graduate and Research Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, St.Xavier's College (Autonomous). Palayamkottai - 627 002, Tamil Nadu, India.

Tel: 0091- 462- 4264374, Fax: 0091- 462-2561765. *E-Mail: [email protected]

Received February 27, 2013

Heavy metals are important environmental pollutants and their toxicity is a problem of increasing significance for ecological, evolutionary and environmental reasons. The interference of germination related proteins by heavy metals has not been well documented at the proteomic and genomic level. In the current study, molecular responses of germinating groundnut seeds were investigated under Zinc stress. The SDS-PAGE showed the preliminary changes in the polypeptides patterns under Zinc stress. Restriction digestion banding pattern of EcoRI and Hind III enzymes showed distinct banding pattern in the treated plants.

Key words: Heavy metal stress, Arachis hypogea L., SDS- PAGE - polypeptides, Restriction enzymes.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Molecular Responses of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) to Zinc Stress

A. John De Britto, T. Leon Stephan Raj and M. Sutha

Post Graduate and Research Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, St.Xavier's College (Autonomous). Palayamkottai - 627 002, Tamil Nadu, India.

Tel: 0091- 462- 4264374, Fax: 0091- 462-2561765. *E-Mail: [email protected]

Received February 27, 2013

Heavy metals are important environmental pollutants and their toxicity is a problem of increasing significance for ecological, evolutionary and environmental reasons. The interference of germination related proteins by heavy metals has not been well documented at the proteomic and genomic level. In the current study, molecular responses of germinating groundnut seeds were investigated under Zinc stress. The SDS-PAGE showed the preliminary changes in the polypeptides patterns under Zinc stress. Restriction digestion banding pattern of EcoRI and Hind III enzymes showed distinct banding pattern in the treated plants.

Key words: Heavy metal stress, Arachis hypogea L., SDS- PAGE - polypeptides, Restriction enzymes.

The effect of environmental stresses on plants has been one of the main interests in modern biological research. This is connected with radical ecological changes and reduction in biodiversity. Changes driven by ecological stresses can be investigated at molecular and other hierarchical levels. Such stresses as drought, salt, cold, heat, chemical pollutants, heavy metals and others, frequently act together and trigger adaptive and protective mechanisms (Vinocur and Altman, 2005). Heavy metals represent both essential components for the maintenance of normal biological functions

and toxic agents with damaging consequences when present in inappropriate amounts. Metals such as copper and zinc play important roles as cofactors for normal enzyme functioning, and zinc contributes to the structural elements of some transcription factors. Excessive concentrations of trace elements (Cd, Co, Cr, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn) are toxic and lead to growth inhibition, decrease in biomass and death of the plant (Zenk, 1996). Plants exposed to high levels of heavy metals typically accumulate the metals in their tissues, often to toxic levels that decrease growth or reproduction.

The mechanisms utilized by plants to protect cells from excess heavy metals are not completely understood, but are known to include internal and eternal chelators, efflux pumping, vacuolar compartmentalization, and heat-shock proteins (Cobbett, 2000).

A general response of plants to elevated levels of heavy metals appears to be increased synthesis of various heat-shock proteins (Hsps) (Barque et al., 1996; Wollgiehn and Neumann, 1999). However, the specific cell components or processes targeted by Hsps during metal stress are not yet identified. The genome (DNA) is stable through many stress, the transcriptome (mRNA population) and proteome (protein population) change during development, under biotic and abiotic stress, sometimes rapidly and dramatically (Rampitsch and Srinivasan, 2006). Present investigation was carried out to understand the Zinc stress mediated molecular response in groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.), an important legume food crop of India grown on about 8 million ha of land.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material and stress treatment

The groundnut seeds (Nadu) were collected from seed testing centre, Tirunelveli and soaked with water for 24 hrs. Ten pre-soaked seeds were sown in trays filled with equal amount of garden soil and sandy soil and treated with aqueous solution of different concentrations Zinc (0.10 ppm and 0.15 ppm conc.) at regular interval. Distilled water was used in case of control. The Zinc treated germinated plant materials were collected on 10th and 20th day for analysis.

Isolation of protein

The isolation of protein was done as per Lowry et al. (1951) and separated in 10% Sodium Dodecyl

Sulphate - Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) following the procedure given by Lammelli (1970).

DNA Isolation

Genomic DNA was isolated form the young leaves of the stressed plants as per standard protocol of Doyle and Doyle (1987) and quantified as per Sambrook and Russell (2000).

Restriction Enzyme Digestion

Restriction digestion performed by two restriction enzymes Eco R I and Hind III. The restriction digestion mixture was prepared by sterile double distilled water (13 ^l), 10X restriction buffer (2 ^l), DNA sample (3 ^l) and restriction enzyme (2 ^l) in a micro centrifuge tube. The mixture was gently mixed by repeated pipetting or tapping and incubated at 370 C. The reaction was stopped by incubating the mixture at 600 C for 2 minutes. The reaction product was checked in the Agarose Gel (1%) Electrophoresis.

Determination of Molecular Weight

The molecular weight of the protein and DNA was compared by standard molecular ruler. Standard proteins with molecular weights of 205.0, 97.4, 66.0, 43.0, 29.0, 20.1, 14.8, 6.5, 3.5 and 2.8 kilo Dalton (kDa) were used as markers. 100 base pairs (bp) molecular marker was used as DNA standard ruler.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Protein Profile

Totally 17 bands (Figure 1) were observed on 10th day of Zinc stress. The control had five bands with molecular weight ranging from 112.0 to 3.5 kDa. Plants treated with 0.10 ppm and 0.15 ppm Zinc showed seven and five banding patterns ranging from 39.8 to 2.8 and 35.8 to 2.8 kDa respectively (Table 1). On 10th day concentration,

five new bands (39.8, 28.2, 8.0, 5.1 and 2.8 kDa) low molecular weight HSPs (Vierling, 1991). Similar

were observed in 0.10 ppm and four new bands types of proteins were observed in the stressed

(39.8, 28.2, 8.0 and 2.8 kDa) were observed from conditions in our study. The main function of such

0.15 ppm. In 0.10 ppm the number of bands was HSPs is to alter the conformation or assembly of

slightly increased and their molecular weight also other protein structure.

differed from control. Same type of new protein Through genetic analysis and cellular biological

bands were observed in 0.15 ppm. research it became clear that the major stress

On the 20th day, eleven bands were reported in proteins were acting as molecular chaperones in a

control and their molecular weight varied from variety of cellular systems. It now seems that

112.0 to 2.0 kDa. At 0.10 ppm and 0.15 ppm Zn virtually all the major families of stress proteins act

concentrations, ten and eight banding patterns as molecular chaperones in at least one system.

ranging from 28.0 to 2.9 and 56.2 to 4.0 kDa were Molecular chaperons are key components

reported. On 20th day, three new bands (28.0, 11.0 contributing to cellular homeostasis in cells under

and 8.0 kDa) were observed in 0.10 ppm Zn stress conditions. They are responsible for the

treatment so also three new protein bands (56.2, protein folding, assembly, translocation and

11.0 and 8.0 kDa) were observed in case of 0.15 degradation (Knight and Ackerly, 2001). It is well

ppm Zn treatment (Figure. 1). known that members of HSP70kDa family are

Several classes of Heat Shock Proteins (HSP) mainly localised in i cytoplasm, where both stress-

have been described in plants, among them induced and constitutive polypeptides are

HSPllOkDa, HSP90kDa, HSP70kDa HSP60kDa and expressed (Bukau and Horwich, 1998; Morimoto,

1998).

123 4 'S' ~ 6 M

KD

— 205

— 97.4

— 66

— 43

— 29

— 20,1

— 14.3

6.5

r~ 3.5

1.10th day Control 2.10th day 0.10ppm

3.10th day 0.15ppm 4. 20th day Control

5. 20th day 0.10ppm 5. 20th day 0.15ppm

M. Molecular Weight Marker.

Figure 1. Effect of Zinc on protein in Arachis hypogea L.

JOURNAL OF STRESS PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY Vol. 9 No. 3 2013

Eco R I

Hind III

1. Control, 2. O.IOppm, 3. 0.15ppm

Figure 2. Restriction digestion banding pattern on 20th day zinc treated groundnat plant.

Table 1. Molecular weight of Proteins in Arachis hypogeae L. under Zinc stress.

Band Number 1Oth DAY 2Oth DAY Molecular Marker (Lane 7)

Control (Lane 1) 0.10ppm (Lane 2) 0.15ppm (Lane 3) Control (Lane 4) 0.10ppm (Lane 5) 0.15ppm (Lane 6)

1 + - - + - - 205.0

2 - - - - - 97.4

3 + 66.0

4 - - - - - +

5 - + + + - - 43.0

6 - + + - + 29.0

7 - - - + -

8 + + - + + + 20.0

9 + + - + + + 14.3

10 - - - - + + -

11 - - - + + - -

12 + - - + + - -

13 - + + + + + -

14 - + - + + + 6.5

15 + - + + + + 3.5

16 - + + + + - 2.8

Table 2. DNA banding pattern of EcoRI and Hind III digestion in Zinc Treated 20th day Arachis hypogea L.

Band No. EcoRI Hind III

Control (Lane-1) bp 0.10ppm (Lane-2) bp 0.15ppm (Lane-3) bp Control (Lane-1) bp 0.10ppm (Lane-2) bp 0.15ppm (Lane-3) bp

1. - 1784.6 - - - -

2. 1778.2 1778.2 1778.2 1778.2 1778.2 1778.2

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

3. - - - - - 1757.3

4. - 1428.4 - - 1603.6 -

5. 1380.6 - 1380.6 - - -

6. - - - 1258.4 1258.4 -

7. - - - - - -

8. - - - - - -

9. - - - - - 1174.3

Restriction Analysis

Usually restriction enzymes recognize only the recognition sites. If the DNA is affected due to stresses the recognition sequences also are affected or altered and it will be reflected in the banding pattern when such restriction enzymes are used. In our investigation, we used two restriction enzymes EcoRI and Hindlll both in the control and the treated DNA of 20th day groundnut sample and compared the banding pattern. The molecular weight of the control plant differed from treated plant (Figure 2) proving that in treated plants the DNA sequences have been altered by Zn stress. It was reported that Zn ions were shown to inhibit DNA fragmentation and apoptosis induced by various stimuli in different systems (Ciesieslska et al., 2000; Cai and Cherian, 2003).

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that, although zinc metal is essential for normal plant growth and physiological processes, above threshold concentrations the metal is toxic and may result in growth inhibition and altered metabolic processes in groundnut. The Heat Shock Proteins and chaperones are synthesized in response to Zn stress in ground nut plants. It is important that ground nut crop should be protected from such heavy metal stress and measures should be taken to reduce Zn stress.

REFERENCES

Barque, J. P., Abahamid, A., Chacun, H. and Bonaly, J. (1996) Different heat-shock proteins are constitutively overexpressed in cadmium and pentachlorophenol adapted Euglena gracilis cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 223: 7-11.

Bukau, B. A. and Horwich, A. L. (1998) The Hsp 70

and Hsp 60 chaperone machines. Cell, 92: 351366.

Cai, L. and Cherian, G. (2003) Zinc-metallothionein protects from DNA damage induced by radiation better than glutathione and Cu-or Cd- metallothioneins. Toxicol Lett., 136: 193198.

Ciesieslska, A. S., Stachura, A., Sbotwinska, M., Kamibska, T., Sniezka, R., Paduch, R., Abramczyk, D., Filar, J. and Szerszen, M. K. (2000) The inhibitory effect of zinc on cadmium-induced cell apoptosis and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) production in cell cultures. Toxicology, 145: 159-171.

Cobbett, C. S. (2000) Phytochelatins and their roles in heavy metal detoxification. Plant Physiology, 123: 825-832.

Doyle, J. J. and Doyle, J. L. (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull., 19: 11-15.

Knight Ch, A. S. and Ackerly, D. D. (2001) Correlated evolution of chloroplast heat shock protein expression in closely related plant species. Amer. J. Botany., 88: 411- 418.

Lammelli, U. K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins. during the assembly of the head of the bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227: 680.

Lowry, O. H., Rose Brough, Fan, N. J. and Randall, R. J. (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin-phenol reagent. J. Bio. Chem., 193: 265-272.

Morimoto, R. I. (1998) Regulation of the heat shock transcriptional response: cross talk between a family of heat shock factors, molecular chaperones and negative regulators. Genes. Dev., 12: 3788-3796.

Rampitsch Ch and Srinivasan, M. (2006) The application of proteomics to plant biology: a

review. Can. J .Bot., 4: 883-892.

Sambrook and Russell. (2000) Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Third Edition.Vol 1. Cold Spring Harbors Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.

Vierling, E. (1991) The roles of heat shock proteins in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 32: 579-620.

Vinocur, B. and Altman, A. (2005) Recent advances

in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 6: 123-132.

Wollgiehn, R. and Neumann, D. (1999) Metal stress response and tolerance of cultured cells from Silene vulgaris and Lycopersicon peruvian-um: role of heat stress proteins. Journal of Plant Physiology, 154: 547- 553.

Zenk, M. H. (1996) Heavy metal detoxification in higher plants-a review. Gene, 179: 21.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.