CC BY
40Russian Journal of Nematology, 2014, 22 (1), 31 - 38
Molecular and morphological characterisation of Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. n. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchinae) from southwestern Iran
Ali Yaghoubi, Ebrahim Pourjam, Mohammad Reza Atighi and Majid Pedram
'Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
e-mail: pourjame@modares.ac.ir
Accepted for publication 19 January 2013
Summary. Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. n. is described and illustrated based on morphological, morphometic and molecular characters. The new species is characterised by its body length of 355-487 ^m in females, a slightly off-set head, lateral field with three lines, total stylet length of 9.0-12.5 ^m, excretory pore at 55-70 ^m and hemizonid at 59-76 ^m distance from anterior end, shape of the tail in females and males and arrangement of papillae in male. The new species comes close in morphology and morphometrics to five known species of the genus, namely E. attenuata, E. musae, E. sylvestris, E. kelardashtensis and E. pini, mostly by having a long and filiform tail (posterior body). Based on molecular data (the results of the phylogenetic comparisons using sequences of 28S rDNA D2D3 expansion segment), the new species shows more similarity to E. kelardashtensis (80.8% similarity in overlapping part of partial sequences of D2D3). Compared with E. attenuata, the new species has a shorter body, shorter stylet, lower a and b values, shorter post-uterine sac, more posterior position of vulva, differences in shape of the tail and spicules of male. Compared with E. musae, the new species has shorter body, shorter stylet and post-uterine sac, lower b value and presence of male. Compared with E. sylvestris, the new species has a shorter stylet, lower a and b values, more anteriorly located vulva, greater distance between vulva-posterior body end and presence of male. Compared with E. kelardashtensis, it has a shorter stylet, lower b value and MB, greater value of vulva-posterior body end to body width in vulva ratio, lateral field with three incisures, midventral precloacal papilla (P1), difference in position of P2 and shape of tail and spicules in male. Compared with E. pini, the new species has a shorter body and stylet, lower b value and midventral precloacal papilla (P1) and the second pair of subventral papillae (P2). Molecular analyses were performed based on 757 bp partial sequences of 28S rDNA D2D3 segment and showed E. ruehmi sp. n. to be unique, but closest to E. kelardashtensis. Both species formed a clade with 0.98 Bayesian posterior probability in Bayesian inference and 87% bootstrap value in the Maximum Likelihood method.
Key words: 28S rDNA D2D3, Ektaphelenchoides, molecular phylogeny, new species, Khouzestan province, Iran.
The genus Ektaphelenchoides Baujard, 1984 was erected by Baujard (1984) and currently contains 11 valid species, namely E. pini (Massey, 1966) Baujard, 1984, E. attenuata (Massey, 1974) Baujard, 1984, E. musae Baujard, 1984, E. compsi Baujard, 1984, E. winteri Hooper, 1995, E. spondylis Kanzaki, Giblin-Davis & Center, 2009, E. hunti Atighi, Pourjam, Pedram, Ye & Robbins, 2012, E. sylvestris Pedram, Pourjam, Atighi, Ye & Houshmand, 2012, E. andrassyi Atighi, Pourjam, Pedram, Ye & Aliramaji, 2013, E. kelardashtensis Atighi, Pourjam, Pedram, Ye, Robbins & Namjou, 2013 and E. poinari Aliramaji, Pourjam, Atighi, Ye, Roshan-Bakhsh & Pedram, 2014. A review on
related hosts and locality of the above mentioned taxa is given in Atighi et al. (2012) and Aliramaji et al. (2014). Currently, E. sylvestris is successfully reared in a co-culture with rhabditid and aphelenchid nematodes and recently the predatory behaviour of E. spondylis was observed on Pseudodiplogasteroides sp. (Kanzaki, 2014).
During our surveys on plant-parasitic and free-living nematodes in southern Iran, a new species of Ektaphelenchoides was recovered from soil samples collected about the rhizosphere of an unidentified weed and is described herein as E. ruehmi sp. n. This is the sixth species of the genus described originally from Iran along with E. hunti, E.
sylvestris, E. andrassyi, E. klardashtensis and E. poinari. The seventh species, E. compsi has previously been reported from Iran (Rafiee et al, 2011).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Several soil samples were collected from southwestern Iran during 2012-2013. To obtain a cleaner suspension of nematodes, the tray method (Whitehead & Hemming, 1965) was used to extract them. The nematodes were heat killed by adding boiling 4% formalin solution and then transferred to anhydrous glycerin and mounted on permanent slides according to De Grisse (1969). Permanent slides were examined using a Nikon Eclipse E600 light microscope. Photographs were taken using an Olympus DP72 digital camera attached to an Olympus BX51 microscope with differential interference contrast (DIC). Drawings were made using a drawing tube attached to the microscope and were redrawn using CorelDRAW® software version 12.
For molecular study, a single nematode specimen was hand-picked and transferred to a small drop of AE buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, 0.5 mM EDTA; pH 9.0) on a clean slide and squashed using a clean slide cover. The suspension was collected by adding 15 ^l AE buffer. DNA samples were stored at -20°C until used as a PCR template. Primers for LSU D2D3 amplification were forward primer D2A (5'-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGT-3') and reverse primer D3B (5'-TGCGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA-3') (Nunn, 1992). PCR was carried out in a total volume of 20 ^l (13.3 ^l distilled water, 2 ^l 10* PCR buffer, 0.4 ^l dNTP mixture, 0.8 ^l 50 mM MgCl2, 1 ^l of each primer (10 pmol ^l"1), 0.5 ^l of Taq polymerase (CinnaGen, Tehran, Iran, ca 5 U ^l-
and 1 ^l of DNA template). The thermal cycling program was as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. A final extension was performed at 72°C for 10 min. PCR product was purified and sequenced directly for both strands using the same primers with an ABI 3730XL sequencer (Bioneer Corporation, South Korea). The newly obtained sequence was submitted to GenBank database under accession number KF509853.
The sequences of D2D3 expansion segments of 28S ribosomal RNA gene (D2D3 LSU) of the new species was compared with those of other nematode species available in GenBank using the BLAST homology search program. The selected sequences were aligned using the ClustalX2 (http://www.clustal.org/) software. The model of
base substitution was evaluated using MrModeltest 2 (Nylander, 2004). The Akaike-supported model, a general time reversible model, including among-site rate heterogeneity and estimates of invariant sites (GTR+G+I) was used in phylogenetic analyses. Bayesian analysis was performed to reconstruct phylogenetic tree using MrBayes v 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist, 2001; Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003) running the chain for one million generations. After discarding burn-in samples and evaluating convergence, the remaining samples were retained for further analyses. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method within a Bayesian framework was used to determine equilibrium distribution and help to estimate the posterior probabilities of the phylogenetic trees (Larget & Simon, 1999) using the 50% majority rule. An ML tree was constructed by using RaxmlGUI 1.1 (Silvestro & Michalak, 2011) software using the same nucleotide substitution model as in the BI in 1000 bootstrap replicates. For the both phylogenetic analyses methods (BI and ML), Poikilolaimus piniperdae Fuchs, 1930 (DQ059060) was used as the outgroup.
DESCRIPTION
Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. n.
(Figs 1 & 2)
Measurements. Table 1.
Female. Body slightly curved ventrally after heat relaxation. Cuticle finely annulated, annules ca 1.0 ^m wide. Lateral field with three incisures. Lip region slightly off-set, separated from the rest of body without a distinct constriction. Three lips in lateral view equal in size. Stylet without basal swellings, its conus occupying 40-50% of total stylet length. Procorpus cylindrical, 4.5-6.6 times longer than stylet length, connected to an elongate, rectangular to oval metacorpus, its anterior granular part occupying 28-46% of the total length and the posterior part weakly muscular. Pharyngeal gland lobe dorsally overlapping intestine 0.8-1.3 times the distance from anterior end to the base of median bulb or 4.5-6.7 times body width at median bulb level. Nerve ring surrounding pharynx slightly anterior to excretory pore position. Excretory pore at 55-70 ^m distance from anterior end. Hemizonid 313 ^m posterior to excretory pore. Ovary single, outstretched, oocytes mostly in single file. Spermatheca oval to irregular in shape, having spheroid sperm cells, vaginal perpendicular to body axis, not sclerotised. Post-uterine sac short, less than or equal to half body width at vulva region. Vulva at 258-341 ^m from anterior end. Intestine ends in a
blind sac. Anus and rectum indistinct. Distance between vulva and body end 8.8-11.8 times of body width at vulva region. Postvulval body part tapering gradually to a filiform tail tip.
Male. Body slender, J-shaped after heat relaxation, the posterior end more ventrally bent. Anterior region similar to that of female. Testis single, expanded anteriorly. Spicules arcuate, separate, ca 2.9 times longer than capitulum width, lamina/calomus complex smoothly and
symmetrically curved, condylus well-developed with rounded tip, rostrum pointed, cucullus absent. The midventral precloacal papilla (P1) 9.5 ^m anterior to cloacal opening, the second pair of subventral papillae (P2) just posterior to cloacal aperture (1.8 ^m distance from cloacal opening) and the third pair (P3) at ca 34% of tail length posterior to cloacal aperture, the fourth subventral pair of papillae (P4) absent. Tail conoid, posterior part spicate.
Characters Holotype Female Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. Paratype Female n. Male
n - 19.0 2.0
L 411 424.9 ± 39.7 (355-487) 348.5 ± 9.2 (342-355)
a 34.3 34.5 ± 1.9 (31.3-38.0) 33.2 ± 1.4 (32.3-34.2)
b 6.2 6.4 ± 0.4 (5.3-7.0) 5.3 ± 0.2 (5.2-5.5)
b' 3.5 3.4 ± 0.2 (3.0-3.8) 7.7 ± 1.4 (6.7-8.7)
V or T 72.5 69.8 ± 1.9 (67.3-73.3) -
c - - 10.2 ± 1.3 (9.2-11.1)
c' - - 4.1 ± 0.8 (3.6-4.6)
Stylet 11 11.0 ± 0.9 (9.0-12.5) 10.0 ± 0.7 (9.5-10.5)
Conus 4.5 5.0 ± 0.6 (4-6) 4.5 ± 0.7 (4-5)
m 41 45.6 ± 2.4 (40.9-50.0) 44.9 ± 3.9 (42.1-47.6)
Anterior end to centre of center of median bulb 47 45.8 ± 4.2 (39-52) 43.5 ± 3.5 (41-46)
MB 71.2 69.5 ± 4.7 (52.2-76.1) 66.4 ± 4.7 (63.1-69.7)
Excretory Pore 64 64.6 ± 5.1 (55-73) 67.0 ± 4.2 (64-70)
Hemizonid 69 69.4 ± 6.2 (59-75) 58.0 ± 9.9 (51-65)
Pharynx 66 66.3 ± 8.5 (57-92) 65.5 ± 0.7 (65-66)
Overlapping 53 59.3 ± 7.5 (56-73) 46.0 ± 7.1 (41-51)
Head-Vulva 298 296.7 ± 28.8 (248-341) -
Body Width(BW) 12 12.3 ± 1.2 (10-14) 10.5 ± 0.7 (10-11)
PUS 6 4.7 ± 0.9 (3-7) -
PUS/body width at vulva 0.5 0.4 ± 0.1 (0.3-0.5) -
Median bulb Length 15 13.2 ± 1.1 (12-15) 12.5 ± 1.4 (11.5-13.5)
Median bulb Width 0.8 7.6 ± 0.6 (7-9) 7.0 ± 0.0 (7-7)
BW in Median bulb 11 10.8 ± 0.5 (10-12) 9.8 ± 0.4 (9.5-10.0)
Vulva-Body end 113 128.2 ± 14.6 (97-151) -
Anal Body Width - - 8.5 ± 0.7 (8-9)
Tail - - 34.5 ± 3.5 (32-37)
Spicules length (arc line) - - 13 ± 0.0 (13-13)
Tablel. Morphometries of Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. n. All measurements are in ^m and in the form: mean ±s.d. (range).
A CDF
Fig. 1. Line drawing of Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. n. A: Pharynx in detail; B: Female posterior body region and part of its reproductive system showing spermatheca having sperm cells; C: Anterior end and stylet; D: Lips and body annules; E & F: Entire body of male and female; G: Spicules; H: Male posterior end showing papillae; I: Male tail tip.
Molecular characterisation and phylogeny.
Sequencing of D2D3 segment of 28S rRNA gene of the new species yielded 757 base pairs. A BlastN search using this sequence, revealed it as a unique sequence and the closest matches were species of genera Ektaphelenchoides, Devibursaphelenchus Kakulia, 1967 and Cryptaphelenchus Fuchs, 1937. Thirty-nine aphelenchid species were selected for reconstructing the phylogenetic tree using Poikilolaimus piniperdae as outgroup, yielding in 821 total characters from which 189 characters were conserved, 611 characters variable and 521 characters parsimony informative. The average nucleotide composition of this dataset was as
follows: 22.9% A, 19.3% C, 30.5% G and 27.3% T. Figure 3 presents a phylogenetic tree inferred from BI. The BPP and ML BS values exceeding 50% are given for the appropriate clades in the shape BPP/ML BS. The new species, E. ruehmi sp. n. is in a highly supported clade with E. kelardashtensis in both BI and ML analyses. This could be explained with their close morphology too. All species of Ektaphelenchoides form a fully supported group with Ektaphelenchus obtusus Massey, 1956, Devibursaphelenchus wangi Gu, Wang & Zheng, 2010, D. hunanensis Yin, Fang & Taijan, 1988, D. lini Braasch, 2004 and Cryptaphelenchus sp. in BI. This group was not supported in ML method. Based
Fig. 2. Microphotographs of Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. n. A: Anterior end and stylet; B: Pharynx and the position of excretory pore (arrow); C: Part of pharynx showing overlapping; D: Part of female genital tract; E: Spermatheca in detail, F: Lips and body annules, G: Three lateral lines; H: Male posterior end and papillae; I: Spicules in detail; J: Blind end of intestine (female); J: Female tail tip. (All scale bars = 10 ^m).
¡.(10/100
0.53/-
AB537560 Pseudaphelenchus vindai _ AB470972 Pseudaphetenchus yukiae
, AM269475 Ruehmaphelenchus asiaticus
] .00/39
O.W-
0.55^
0.73 -
^ I— JN153103 Bursaphelenchus mazandaranense H r— AY 50 80 84 Bursaphelenchus hofinanni M- AM 396574 Bursaphelenchus pinasteri
OQ/96 T Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
—|r GQ870257 Bursaphelenchus mucronatus — EU295493 Bursaphelenchus mucronatus _ F J520229 Bwsaphelenchus doui - EU295497 Bursaphelenchus lhailandae
0.98/53
AM396578 Bursaphelenchus vallesianus AM396569 Bursaphelenchus hililegardae AY508073 Bursaphelenchus ahruptus
0 -- KF509853 Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. ti.
1.00/791
1,00/-
0,99/88
cE
1,00/-1
JQ446374 Ektaphelenchoides keiardasmensii
--- JN714466 Ektaphelenchoides huntt
AB434934 Ektaphelenchoides spnndylis
DQ257625 Ektaphelenchoides cumpsi - JQ446375 Ektaphelenchoides andrassyl
0.97/74
0.68/-
1.00/1001
GQ903770 Devibursaphelenchus ivangi
I ,m i srj
r
1— FJ768945 Devibursaphelenchus hunanensis DQ257623 Ek t ap h dene ho ides pini _ F J768944 De vibursaphelench us I in i
T
AB368533 Ektaphelenchus abtusus - EU287596 Ciyplaphelenchs sp.
0.71/53r-o.67/7;| L
- AM396589 Aphelertchoides stammeri
- EU287654 Schistonchus caprifici
till 18 7600 Laimaphelenchus auslrulis _ EU287598 Laimaphelenchus preissii
. AY508I09 Aphelenchoidcs besseyi I 00/97r- DQ912928 Schistonchus centerae
0.78/62| 0.99/77 1.00/88
0.63/.
DQ912925 Schistonchus aureus
— DQ328683 Aphelenchoidcs J^garia
— EU287S95 Laimaphelenchus heidelbergi
- AB368539 Laimaphelenchus sp.
j (jftmji- HQ283353 Aphelenchoidcs varicaudatus
K.
FJ 64 34 8 8 Aphelenchoidcs sp. A B 368 540 Aphelenchoidcs fragariae
-DQQ59060 Poikilolaimus piniperdae
Fig. 3. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree inferred from 40 sequences of the D2D3 domains of the 28S rDNA under the GTR+I+G model. BPP and ML BS values are given for each appropriate clade in the shape BPP/ML BS. The newly sequenced species of Ektaphelenchoides is in bold.
on the given phylogenetic tree, the six sequenced species of Ektaphelenchoides with the one another species presented in this study are not monophyletic.
Differential diagnosis and relationships. The new species is characterised by its body length of 355-487 ^m in females, lateral field with three incisures, stylet 9.0-12.5 ^m long, excretory pore at 55-70 ^m and hemizonid at 59-76 ^m distance from anterior end, post-uterine sac short, less than or equal to half body width at vulva region, distance between vulva and body end 8.8-11.8 times body width at vulva region, posterior body end (tail) filiform, having rare males in population characterised by arcuate spicules, ca 2.9 times longer than capitulum width with well-developed condylus having rounded tip, pointed rostrum,
lacking cucullus, midventral precloacal papilla (P1) 9.5 ^m anterior to cloacal opening, the second pair of subventral papillae (P2) just posterior to cloacal aperture, the third pair (P3) at ca 34% of tail length posterior to cloacal aperture and lacking fourth subventral pair of papillae (P4). The new species comes close in morphology and morphometrics to five known species of the genus namely E. attenuata, E. musae, E. sylvestris, E. kelardashtensis and E. pini mostly by having a long and filiform tail (posterior body). Based on molecular data (the results of the phylogenetic comparisons using sequences of 28S rDNA D2D3 expansion segment), it shows more similarity to E. kelardashtensis.
Compared with E. attenuata, the new species has a shorter stylet (9.0-12.5 vs 20 ^m), shorter body
(355-487 vs 870-880 pm), lower a ratio (31-38 vs 34-42), lower b ratio (5.1-6.9 vs 12-13), more posterior position of vulva (V = 67.4-73.3 vs 61-63), slightly set off lip region vs clearly set off, shorter post-uterine sac ca 0.3-0.6 body width vs 1.5, spicules with pointed rostrum vs rounded and male tail spicate vs filiform.
Compared to E. musae, the new species has a shorter stylet (9.0-12.5 vs 18.5-22.0 pm), shorter body length (355-487 vs 500-710 pm), lower b ratio (5.1-6.9 vs 7.4-9.8) and shorter post-uterine sac (3-7 vs 9-19 pm).
Compared to E. sylvestris, the new species has a shorter stylet (9.0-12.5 vs 18-23 pm), shorter body length (355-487 vs 644-843 pm), greater a ratio (3138 vs 25-32), lower b ratio (5.1-6.9 vs 8-11), anterior position of vulva (V = 67.4-73.3 vs 75.076.5) and shorter vulva-posterior body end distance (97-151 vs 153-204 pm).
Compared to E. kelardashtensis, the new species has a shorter stylet (9.0-12.5 vs 13-16 pm), lower b ratio (5.1-6.9 vs 8.0-11.2), more posterior position of vulva (V = 67.4-73.3 vs 61.5-68.0), more anterior position of median bulb (MB = 52.5-76.1 vs 79.394.0), lower ratio of vulva-posterior body end to body width in vulva region (8.8-11.8 vs 12.6-17.4), lateral line with three incisures vs obscure, position of P2 (just posterior to cloacal aperture vs just anterior to cloacal aperture) shape of tail (conoid with spicate terminus vs conoid with sharply pointed terminus) and shape of spicules.
Compared to E. pini, the new species has a shorter stylet (9.0-12.5 vs 23 pm), shorter body (355-487 vs 720 pm), lower b ratio (5.1-6.9 vs 9) and midventral precloacal papilla (P1) and the second pair of subventral papillae (P2) vs their absence.
Type habitat and locality. Recovered from soil samples collected about the rhizosphere of an unidentified weed, in Khouzestan province, southwestern Iran during March 2013. GPS coordinates N32°27.450, E48°22.796.
Type material. Holotype female, five paratype females and paratype males deposited at Nematode Collection at Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. Three female paratypes deposited at each of the following collections: CABI Europe-UK, Egham, Surrey, UK; USDA Nematode Collection, Beltsville, MD, USA and Department of Nematology, Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Etymology. The new species is named in honor of Walter Rühm, a pioneer in the taxonomy of bark-beetle associated nematodes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We acknowledge the Iranian National Science
Foundation (INSF) and Tarbiat Modares University
(Iran) for financial supports.
REFERENCES
Aliramaji, F., Pourjam, E., Atighi, M.R., Ye, W., Roshan-Bakhsh, A. & Pedram, M. 2014. Description of Ektaphelenchoides poinari sp. n. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchinae) from Iran with compendium of the valid species of the genus Ektaphelenchoides Baujard, 1984. Russian Journal of Nematology, Russian Journal of Nematology 22:11-22.
Atighi, M.R., Pourjam, E., Pedram, M., Ye, W. & Robbins, R.T. 2012. Molecular and morphological characterization of Ektaphelenchoides hunti sp. n. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchinae) from north of Iran. Russian Journal of Nematology 20: 37-44.
Atighi, M.R., Pourjam, E., Pedram, M., Ye, W., Robbins, R.T. & Namjou, S. 2013. Molecular and morphological characterization of Ektaphelenchoides kelardashtensis sp. n. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchinae) from northern Iran. Russian Journal of Nematology 21: 23-30.
Baujard, P. 1984. Remarques sur la sous-famille des Ektaphelenchinae Paramonov, 1964 et proposition d'Ektaphelenchoides n. gen. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae). Revue de Nématologie 7: 147-171.
Braasch, H. 2004. A new Bursaphelenchus species (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae) sharing characters with Ektaphelenchidae from the People's Republic of China. Zootaxa 624: 1-10.
De Grisse, A.T. 1969. Redescription ou modifications de quelques techniques utilisees dans l'etude des nematodes phytoparasitaires. Mededelingen Faculteit
Landbouwwetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent 34: 351-369.
Gu J., Wang, J. & Zheng, J. 2010. Devibursaphelenchus wangi sp. n. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchinae) feeding on Aphelenchoides sp. Russian Journal of Nematology 18: 49-57.
Hooper, D.J. 1995. Ektaphelenchoides winteri n. sp. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchidae) from wood fly larvae Xylodiplosis sp. (Diptera: Cecidomyidae). Fundamental and Applied Nematology 18: 465-470.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
Kakulia, G.A. 1967. [New nematode genus, Devibursaphelenchus n. g. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae).] Soobschcheniya Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoi SSR 47: 439-443 (In Russian).
Kanzaki, N. 2014. Ektaphelenchoides spondylis is a predatory nematode. Nematology 16: 245-247.
Kanzaki, N., Giblin-Davis, R.M. & Center, B.J. 2009. Description of Ektaphelenchoides spondylis sp. n.
(Nematoda: Ektaphelenchinae) isolated from Spondylis buprestoides (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Japan. Nematology 11: 181-188.
Larget, B. & Simon, D.L. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 750-759.
Massey, C.L. 1956. Nematode parasites and associates of the Engelmann spruce beetle (Dendroctonus engelmanni Hopk.). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 23: 14-24.
Massey, C.L. 1966. The nematode parasites and associates of Dendroctonus adjunctus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in New Mexico. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 59: 424-440.
Massey, C.L. 1974. Biology and Taxonomy of Nematode Parasites and Associates of Bark Beetles in the United States. Agriculture Handbook (№ 446). USA, USDA, Forest Service, 233 pp.
Nunn, G.B. 1992. Nematode molecular evolution. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Nottingham, UK, 192 pp.
Nylander, J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. Available from: <http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/nylander.html).
Pedram, M., Pourjam, E., Atighi, M.R., Ye, W. & Houshmand, A. 2012. Ektaphelenchoides sylvestris sp. nov. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchinae) from Iran. Annales Zoologici 62: 325-329.
Rafiee, H., Moghadam, E.M. & Najafnia, M. 2011. First report of Ektaphelenchoides compsi Baujard, 1984 (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) from Iran. International Journal of Zoological Research 7: 164-168.
Ronquist, F. & HUELSENBECK, J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
Silvestro, D. & Michalak, I. 2011. RaxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for raxML. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 12: 335-337.
Whitehead, A.G. & Hemming, J.R. 1965. A comparison of some quantitative methods for extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Annals of Applied Biology 55: 25-38.
Yin, K., Fang, Y. & Tarjan, A. C. 1988. A key to species in the genus Bursaphelenchus with a description of Bursaphelenchus hunanensis sp. n. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) found in pine wood in Hunan Province, China. Proceedings of Helmithological Society of Washington 55: 1-11.
A. Yaghoubi, E. Pourjam, M.R. Atighi, M. Pedram. Молекулярная и морфологическая характеристика Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. n. (Nematoda: Ektaphelenchinae) из юго-западного Ирана.
Резюме. Приводится описание строения, а также морфометрические и молекулярные данные для Ektaphelenchoides ruehmi sp. n. Новый вид отличается длиной тела у самок 355-487 дт, слегка обособленным головным концом, латеральными полями с тремя линиями, общей длиной стилета 9.012.5 дт, экскреторной порой на расстоянии 55-70 дт и гемизонидом на расстоянии 59-76 дт от головного конца, особой формой хвостового конца у самцов и самок и расположением папилл самца. По морфологи и морфометрии новый вид сходен с пятью известными видами рода: E. attenuata, E. musae, E. sylvestris, E. kelardashtensis и E. pini наличием длинного и нитевидного хвостового конца. По молекулярным признакамa (нуклеотидным последовательностям D2D3 сегмента 28S рДНК), новый вид сходен с E. kelardashtensis (80.8% сходство по совпадающей части последовательности D2D3). В сравнении с E. attenuata новый вид имеет более короткое тело и стилет, меньшие значения индексов a и b, более короткий рудимент задней матки смещен кзади вульвой, особенностями формы хвостового конца и спикул. В сравнении с E. musae новый вид имеет более короткое тело, стилет и рудимент задней матки, меньшее значение индекса b. также у нового вида чаще с = встречаются самцы. В сравнении с E. sylvestris новый вид имеет более короткий стилет, меньшее значение индексов a и b, смещенную вперед вульву, большее расстояние между вульвой и задней частью тела, и часто встречающихся самцов. В сравнении с E. kelardashtensis новый вид имеет более короткий стилет, меньшее значение индексов b и MB, большее значение отношения расстояния от вульвы до задней оконечности тела к ширине тела на уровне вульвы, латеральное поле с тремя инцизурами, наличие среднебрюшной преклоакальной папиллы, иное расположение папиллы P2 и форму хвостового конца самцов и спикул. В сравнении с E. pini, новый вид имеет более короткое тело и стилет, меньшее значение b. У нового вида имеются преклоакальные папиллы P1 и вторая пара субвентральных папилл P2. Молекулярный анализ частичной последовательности D2D3-сегмента 28S рДНК длиной 757 п.н. показал обособленность E. ruehmi sp. n. Ближайший вид - E. kelardashtensis. Оба вида формировали ветвь при поддержке в Байесовой филограмме (обратной вероятности) 0.98 и 87% бутстрепа в анализе методом максимального правдоподобия.
