CC BY
73
Вестник Московского университета. Серия 9. Филология. 2018. № 3
Denis S. Mukhortov, Ji Xiaoxiao
METAPHOR CLUSTERING IN AMERICAN
PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURALS -
FROM GEORGE H.W. BUSH TO DONALD TRUMP
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
This paper explores the phenomenon of metaphor clustering in American presidential inaugurals. The analysis shows that metaphor clustering plays a vital role in these inaugurals. Metaphor clusters may contribute to the cognitive and structural coherence of a discourse, the elaboration of important topics within a discourse, and also the fulfillment of a discourse's central purpose. Comparing the use of metaphor clusters in eight inaugurals reveals some similarities and some differences. The central topics of fundamental American values and country development appear in metaphor clusters in each of the seven inaugurals (except Trump's inaugural). Regarding differences, it is evident that each president uses his own individual metaphor types, including a certain favored metaphor which appears more frequently than the rest. This preferred metaphor often repeats itself throughout a discourse and is also used to link together several metaphors in a metaphor cluster. For example, the breeze metaphor is used as a binder to link several metaphors in Bush Senior's inaugural (1989).Trump's inaugural is different from the other four presidents' in terms of the use of metaphor clusters. The instance of metaphor clustering dominated by the carnage metaphor presents a scary image, which brings him some harsh criticism.
Key words: conceptual metaphor; presidential inaugurals; metaphor clusters; metaphor relations; discourse coherence; functions of metaphor.
1. Introduction
Metaphors have been a keen intellectual interest ever since Aristotle's era. The very nature of describing and understanding one kind of thing through the terms of another poses quite a problem for scholars who are interested in truth, particularly philosophers. To name just one example here, Thomas Hobbes once regarded the use of metaphors as a kind of
Denis S. Mukhortov — Candidate of Philology; Associate Professor at Lomonosov Moscow State University's School of Philology, English Linguistics Department (e-mail: [email protected]).
Ji Xiaoxiao — PhD student at Lomonosov Moscow State University's School of Philology, English Linguistics Department (e-mail: [email protected]).
abuse ofspeech [Leviathan, 1996: 21], though he himselfused "Leviathan" metaphorically as the title of his book. It seems as though metaphors have already become ingrained into human thought. Any attempt of thinking without them seems impossible and unnecessary.
What is necessary, however, is to understand them as comprehensively as possible in order to avoid misusing them, whether it be intentionally or unintentionally, and to recognize any occurrences of misuse as efficiently as possible. The ability to recognize metaphor use is highly important because of the crucial roles it plays within a number of discourses, especially in political discourse. According to Kobozeva [2001], the functions of metaphor in the field of political discourse include: a heuristic function to assist the understanding of the ever-changing political reality and formulation of new political programs, an argumentative function to convince the audience of the correctness of certain political views, and a pragmatic interactive function to mitigate the most dangerous political statements that affect controversial political problems and minimize the responsibility of the speaker for the possible literal interpretation of his words by the addressees. Additionally, metaphorical language functions as a common platform which enables addressers to input non-conventional opinions into the consciousness of the addressees [Kobozeva, 2001]. Metaphors in political discourse have the potential to be one of the most effective ways of manipulating the human consciousness [Mukhortov, 2015a]. They may be used to describe and define any actual political situation, associating positive traits with the user and negative ones with his or her opponent [Ji Xiaoxiao, 2016b].
In modern times, the Conceptual Metaphor Theory proposed by Lakoff and Johnson [1980] has inspired various metaphor studies in many different research fields. Their idea of considering metaphors in terms of thought expands the overall understanding of metaphors. People not only express their ideas through metaphors, but also think metaphorically, know the world through metaphors, and even try to transform the linguistic picture ofthe addressee during the process of communication [Chudinov, 2013: 4]. In political discourse, observing the changes in prevailing metaphors across different epochs enables us to understand their different political realities and subsequently the changes in political situations, country, culture, lifestyle and ways of thinking [Kondratjeva and Kovaleva, 2016]. For example: in the Soviet totalitarian era, the dominating metaphors are military ones; in the era of stagnation, metaphors of kinship are at the forefront; during perestroika, architectural metaphors are most prevalent; and at the end of last century, the theatrical, sexual and criminal metaphors are most common [Baranov, 1991; Budaev, 2011; Kaslova, 2003; Chudinov, 2001, cit. in Kondratjeva and Kovaleva, 2016].
Among many branches of metaphor studies, the topic of the relationship between metaphors drew a certain amount of attention from scholars. For example, Baranov [2014: 43] put forward the notion of "metaphor constellation" which refers to the totality of metaphoric models that are interrelated in terms of approximation in profiling certain properties of the source sphere and the target sphere. The focus of this notion is mainly on the relationship between metaphors which are similar to each other to some extent. Compared to the topic of the relationship between metaphors, the phenomenon of the distribution of metaphors in a discourse is given relatively less attention. However, its obvious existence in different discourse contexts means that it deserves much more attention and effort in exploring its nature and characteristics.
The concept of metaphor clustering in this paper concerns the distribution of metaphors in a discourse and the relationship between metaphors in a discourse, i.e. how these metaphors are distributed in a discourse and how they are related to each other. The crowding of several metaphors may form a relative complete cognitive scenario, in which either several images crowd together to form a coherent or incoherent picture, or one image repeats itself to reinforce its effect. These cognitive scenarios embody the speaker or writer's deliberate or subconscious focus in a discourse and are usually closely related to the important topics of the discourse.
One of the earliest studies written about the distribution of figurative language in a discourse comes from the field of psychotherapy. Pollio and Barlow [1975] discovered that figurative language bursts in certain periods throughout individual sessions, and the bursts of figurative language tend to demonstrate therapeutic insight. Pollio and Barlow claimed that these findings suggest that there is a correlation between changes in the rate of figurative language production and the nature and purpose ofthe discourse. Although there is no direct mention of the term "metaphor clustering" in the study, this research is an early glimpse at the phenomenon of the distribution of figurative language in certain discourse context and contributes to the development of the topic.
Jamieson [1980] was likely to be the first user of the term "metaphoric cluster". He studied the phenomenon of metaphoric clusters in the rhetoric of Pope Paul VI and Edmund G. Brown Jr., a politician. He believed that it was not the recurrence of a single metaphor which made their rhetoric significant, but the appearance of clusters of related metaphors. Jamieson did not provide an exact definition for the term "metaphoric cluster". However, his analysis reveals that he viewed metaphoric clusters not based on the distribution of metaphors in a discourse but based on the relationship between different metaphoric lexicons or between different metaphors. He also utilized terms equivalent to "metaphor cluster", such
as "the metaphoric networks" and "clusters of related metaphors" in the paper. Nevertheless, his work is inspiring for subsequent researchers. His claim that "recurrent patterns observable in the surface language reflect deeper rhetorical consistencies" [1980: 51] reveals the close relationship between the occurrence of a certain linguistic feature and its effect in rhetoric.
More recently, metaphor clustering has been studied in many other discourse contexts, such as college lectures, Baptist sermons, business media discourses, and conciliation conversations, which has revealed some insightful findings. Corts and Meyer [1999], in their study of three college lectures, find that figurative language and gestures frequently occur in bursts. These bursts tend to occur when teachers explain unknown and difficult topics to their students, or when different ways of understanding a known topic are presented to students. Besides this, the study finds that "metaphors and gestures both singly and in combination serve 2 functions: (a) to orient audience members to the structure and flow of the lecture and (b) to present and emphasize novel perspectives on significant lecture content" [Corts and Meyer, 1999: 81].
Aside from the college lectures, Corts and Meyer [2002] also study Baptist sermons, which inherently contain many occurrences of figurative language. They find that the clusters of figurative language in Baptist sermons contain a central root metaphor that represents the topic under consideration. The clustering of figurative language in Baptists sermons is usually rooted in a certain topic which is relatively important to the purpose of the speech. Koller [2003] researched metaphor use in business media texts on marketing and mergers and acquisitions, concluding that certain dominant metaphors are qualitatively supported by other metaphors in the metaphor clusters. Metaphor clusters fulfill certain important functions, such as relevance-production in discourse. Cameron and Stelma [2004] studied the conciliation conversations and found that metaphor clusters are "sites of intensive work relating to the central discourse purpose" [2004: 107]. Thus, it can be said that the phenomenon of clustering is closely related to the purpose of discourse itself.
Studies of metaphor clustering confirm that the phenomenon of metaphor clustering exists in many different discourses, and that it is highly important to both the structure and purpose of a discourse. However, there has not been a great deal of such research into political discourse specifically. This paper is a minor contribution to this field.
This paper will analyze metaphor clustering in presidential inaugurals, a specific type of presidential discourse. Presidential discourse, as a kind of political discourse of power, is a specific manifestation of the communication between those in power and the public, and even of the political transformation at a certain era [Gavrilova, 2004]. The study of linguistic
characteristics of a president can reveal his speech patterns, his views, and his manner of political decision-making [Mukhortov, 2015b: 93]. Additionally, his discourse is also deeply influenced by the national culture and political culture. Thus, studying his language and style, such as in the course of the pre-election debate, may reveal a linguistic culture of the nation, its value orientation, and the availability of manipulative technologies for those in power to influence national consciousness [Mukhortov, 2016: 24]. Furthermore, the analysis of specific linguistic features, such as metaphor use in presidential discourse, may reveal the influence of some national and cultural background on presidents' linguistic characteristics and their personal rhetoric [Ji Xiaoxiao, 2016a: 242].
It is a well-known fact that presidential inaugurals are usually written with the help of professional speechwriters. The appearance of speechwrit-ers in the political sphere may partly relate to the complexity of politics and therefore the importance ofproper wording; any carelessness in presidential discourse may lead to troublesome or even disastrous results. Any illogical or improper wording may damage a president's image and reputation. As for the question of who the true author of these speeches is, one reasonable answer may be that it is the person who takes the responsibility for the speeches [Chudinov, 2012: 54]. After all, it is presidents who make the final decision on whether to accept the address, with or without any changes. And when they decide to accept it, they are fully responsible for every word that comes out of their mouths.
Even so, when studying the linguistic characteristics of presidential inaugurals, we have to keep in mind that underlying these linguistic characteristics are not only the thoughts of the presidents themselves, but most of all the "collective unconscious" [Jung, 1996] that belongs to a specific party, or a whole political cycle, or even the whole nation. Therefore, the metaphor use in presidential inaugurals can reflect both the president's own personal thoughts and, more importantly, they may reflect the thoughts and consciousness of his party or his country as a whole.
2. Corpus and method
2.1. Corpus
This paper examines the possible metaphor clustering in eight inaugurals of five American presidents, including George H. W. Bush (1989), Bill Clinton (1993 and 1997), George W. Bush (2001 and 2005), Barack Obama (2009 and 2013), and Donald Trump (2017). The overall data of the addresses contains about 15,660 words. The transcripts of these speeches come from the website "The American Presidency Project": http://www. presidency.ucsb.edu/inaugurals.php
2.2. Method
The definition of metaphor clustering
In this paper, we locate metaphor clustering wherever groups of metaphorical sentences are found. The term metaphorical sentence refers to a sentence that contains one metaphor or more. That is to say, metaphorical sentences are used as the basic unit for studying metaphor clustering in a discourse. Metaphor clustering can be regarded as a textual, or discursive, phenomenon suggesting a combination of metaphors located in adjacent metaphorical sentences throughout a text.
There are two types of metaphor clustering: The first type refers to different kinds of metaphors occurring together in adjacent metaphorical sentences. It is assumed that the minimum number of metaphors making up a cluster is three. Within this cluster, three additional phenomena may occur — when a target domain is metaphorically understood in terms of different source domains, when a source domain is used to understand different target domains, or the phenomenon that different source domains are used to understand different target domains. The second type refers to the phenomenon of an extended metaphor where one metaphor is repeated and developed through linked source domains and target domains in consecutive metaphorical sentences throughout a text or discourse.
The visual presentation-scatter diagram
The results of research are presented both with qualitative discussions and related diagrams. In this paper, scatter diagrams (created with Microsoft Excel) will be used to visually present the distribution of metaphors and metaphor clusters within a discourse. In the scatter diagrams the horizontal axis shows the length of a discourse, i.e. numbers of sentences from the beginning of the discourse. The vertical axis shows the number of metaphorical sentences corresponding to each sentence in a discourse. If a sentence is metaphorical, we will count 1, if not, we will leave it uncounted. This serves the purpose of making each metaphorical sentence a point of data, while non-metaphorical sentences are not counted as a data point. Therefore, these data points will form a horizontal, discontinuous trend. Each instance of metaphor clustering will be bracketed in the diagrams.
The shortcoming ofusing a scatter diagram here is that it only presents a rough representation ofthe distribution of metaphors in a discourse and the variation of the metaphor clusters. This will be further refined and elaborated upon by analyzing specific examples of the phenomenon. Another shortcoming is that more than one metaphor may exist in a metaphorical sentence. Since we only count this sentence as one metaphorical sentence, the diagram may overlook some instances of clustering. The reason why we count a metaphorical sentence that may contain more than one metaphor as one instead of two or three is that we intend to make a horizontal, straight
line of metaphor distribution in a discourse instead of a curved line, since straight lines are more visually understandable. Therefore, this shortcoming will also be solved by the qualitative example analysis.
In the examples, all metaphorical words or phrases come in bold and italics and they are confirmed after checking their basic meaning and contextual meaning with the help of the Merriam-Webster online dictionary.
3. Qualitative analysis
In this section, we will firstly look at metaphor clusters in each inaugural and attempt to answer the following questions: What are their characteristics? How are they related to the address itself? How are the metaphors in a metaphor cluster related to each other? What are their functions in the address? Secondly, an attempt will be made to compare the use of metaphor clusters in all the eight inaugurals in order to find out possible similarities and differences among them.
3.1 Metaphor Clusters in Each Inaugural
George H.W. Bush (January 20, 1989)
(1) I come before you and assume the Presidency at a moment rich with promise. We live in a peaceful, prosperous time, but we can make it better. For a new breeze is blowing, and a world refreshed by freedom seems reborn. For in man's heart, if not in fact, the day of the dictator is over. The totalitarian era is passing, its old ideas blown away like leaves from an ancient, lifeless tree. A new breeze is blowing, and a nation refreshed by freedom stands ready to push on. There is new ground to be broken and new action to be taken. There are times when the future seems thick as a fog; you sit and wait, hoping the mists will lift and reveal the right path. But this is a time when the future seems a door you can walk right through into a room called tomorrow.
Great nations of the world are moving toward democracy through the door to freedom. Men and women of the world move toward free markets through the door to prosperity. The people of the world agitate for free expression and free thought through the door to the moral and intellectual satisfactions that only liberty allows. (January 20, 1989)
(2) Some see leadership as high drama and the sound of trumpets calling, and sometimes it is that. But I see history as a book with many pages, and each day we fill a page with acts of hopefulness and meaning. The new breeze blows, a page turns, the story unfolds. And so, today a chapter begins, a small and stately story of unity, diversity, and generosity — shared, and written, together. (January 20, 1989)
o
Q.
■S 0 (0
MS
^ ( ) ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^ ( )
4 MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Sentences
Figure 1: Distribution diagram of metaphorical sentences in the presidential inaugural of George H.W. Bush in 1989.
There are two occurrences of metaphor clustering in Bush Senior's inaugural. In example (1), several metaphors are crowded together in the two adjacent paragraphs, creating a cognitive scenario that presents the audience with a picture of an unfavorable past and a present filled with the opportunity of progress and a bright future. Moreover, the related metaphorical linguistic expressions in the address suggest that what may make this bright future a reality is the change that will come about when the president is in office.
The first metaphor that deserves our attention is the breeze metaphor. It appears twice in example (1), and five times throughout the address overall. A breeze is a light, gentle wind, which usually causes people to feel a sense of comfort. It is a weather phenomenon common in spring which is synonymous with rebirth and renewal. Therefore, the breeze metaphor used here by George H.W. Bush indicates that on the one hand, there will be some new changes in society during his presidential term, while on the other hand, the change will be tender and minor, which is comfortable and easy to accept, especially due to his former role as vice president to Reagan before he was elected as president.
Because a new breeze is blowing, a world is "reborn", "old ideas blown away like leaves from an ancient, lifeless tree", a nation starts to "push on", and "a new ground is to be broken". It can be noted that the breeze metaphor is combined with the birth metaphor, journey metaphor, the leaves and tree simile, and the building metaphor. All these images contribute to one picture in which a new change is on the way and that this change will have a positive impact. There are causal links between the breeze metaphor and other metaphors here: The following fog simile, journey metaphor, door simile, and room metaphor are also connected, especially the journey metaphor and the door metaphor. George H.W. Bush uses these metaphors here to present us with two pictures to compare: One is the image of a
place full of mist, in which everything is unclear and it is impossible to see an exit route, and the other is a picture of a door that waits for people to walk through it. The two pictures are all about the future. It is clear that the second picture is favorable for everyone; the future depicted in the second picture is the one everyone wants. The correlated images used by the president reinforce the fact that he is well qualified to be a president who would bring his people a brilliant future.
In example (2), Bush combines the breeze metaphor with the book metaphor and the story metaphor. History is seen as a storybook. Again, the new breeze means a new change, and the change turns a new page of the book of history and brings about new developments. It brings a bright future, unity, diversity, and generosity. Example (2) compares the image of high drama and the image of books. High drama is usually used in political discourse to signal something negative, as is the case in this instance. The second image of books is much more preferable.
All in all, we can see from the two examples that metaphors are linked to each other in each instance of metaphor clustering. They are topically related, describing one of the main topics of the address: change. Change is an eternal force in the world. It is a force unseen by humans, but the result it brings can be observed by humans. The formation and development of everything is closely related to the force of change. In presidential inaugurals, the topic of change is oft-mentioned. This instance of metaphor clustering shows the image of a negative past and a positive future. The good future will be guaranteed by the change brought about by the president.
In terms of discourse structure, example (1) appears towards the beginning of the inaugural, and example (2) at the end of the inaugural. In addition, metaphors in these two metaphor clusters are linked together by the breeze metaphor that functions as a cohesive tool. In fact, the repeated occurrence of the breeze image reveals its three main functions: First of all, it has a cohesive function in terms of the text itself. Like a thread, it runs through this inaugural address. In many cases, it is used with other images, such as leaves of an old tree, a beautiful kite and an unfolding book of history. Therefore, the breeze metaphor is combined with other images to make a coherent metaphor system in the discourse. Secondly, it has a reassuring function. The breeze is a natural phenomenon. It is a natural force that cannot be stopped or eliminated. Therefore, the change it brings will certainly occur. All the promises made by the presidents will certainly be realized because of the breeze. This metaphor reassures the audience and makes them believe that a new, positive change will soon occur. Thirdly, this metaphor has the function of justifying an argument or enhancing the justification of an argument. This also reinforces the qualifications of the
speaker. The arguments based on the breeze metaphor are justified because they are logically valid. The breeze can blow away leaves from an old lifeless tree, so it is logically valid that old ideas of the totalitarian era will pass. The breeze can help a kite fly higher and higher, so it is logically valid that more people will be freed when freedom is understood in terms of a kite. The breeze can blow pages of a book, so it is logically valid that people will get to experience new developments for people because of the inevitable change that will take place in the future.
Bill Clinton (January 20, 1993)
(1) We know we have to face hard truths and take strong steps, but we have not done so; instead, we have drifted. And that drifting has eroded our resources, fractured our economy, and shaken our confidence. Though our challenges are fearsome, so are our strengths. Americans have ever been a restless, questing, hopeful people. And we must bring to our task today the vision and will of those who came before us. From our Revolution to the Civil War, to the Great Depression, to the civil rights movement, our people have always mustered the determination to construct from these crises the pillars of our history. Thomas Jefferson believed that to preserve the very foundations of our Nation, we would need dramatic change from time to time. Well, my fellow Americans, this is our time. Let us embrace it.
Our democracy must be not only the envy of the world but the engine of our own renewal. There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America. And so today we pledge an end to the era of deadlock and drift, and a new season of American renewal has begun.
(2) The brave Americans serving our Nation today in the Persian Gulf, in Somalia, and wherever else they stand are testament to our resolve. But our greatest strength is the power of our ideas, which are still new in many lands. Across the world we see them embraced, and we rejoice. Our hopes, our hearts, our hands are with those on every continent who are building democracy and freedom. The cause is America's cause. The American people have summoned the change we celebrate today. You have raised your voices in an unmistakable chorus. You have cast your votes in historic numbers. And you have changed the face of Congress, the Presidency, and the political process itself. Yes, you, my fellow Americans, have forced the spring. Now we must do the work the season demands. To that work I now turn with all the authority of my office. I ask the Congress to join with me. But no President, no Congress, no Government can undertake this mission alone.
In Bill Clinton's inaugural in 1993, there are two examples of metaphor clustering. In example (1), the metaphorical words and phrases in bold and italics seem to crowd into three groups. However, the last two groups are semantically much closer to each other, with one short sentence between them, so they can be identified as metaphor clustering. The metaphor cluster
consists of the building metaphor, engine metaphor, illness-curing metaphor, movement metaphor, and the seasonal metaphor. These metaphors relate to the topic of change, and past and future.
MS
|1i ( )♦♦♦♦( )♦♦
Q.
& 0
4 MS
20
40 60 Sentences
80
100
Figure 2: Distribution diagram of metaphorical sentences in the presidential inaugural of Bill Clinton in 1993.
There are two building metaphors - HISTORY IS A BUILDING and NATION IS A BUILDING. As an indispensable part of human life, buildings are everywhere: They may take the form of a house that provides shelter to people, a museum that provides knowledge to people, or a theater that provides entertainment to people. To understand an abstract concept in terms of construction may emphasize different aspects of this abstract concept with focus on different parts of construction. It may emphasize the difficulty of the building process, or it may emphasize the final product of the construction. It may even emphasize the materials used in the construction. All these possibilities depend on the user's conceptualization habits.
It is common to see a country as a construction; the development of a country requires a literal building process and a metaphorical building process. To see a country as a construction makes the abstract concept of a country seem more real and concrete. As a result, the metaphor presents the audience with an image of construction, making any contribution to the building ofAmerica visible. It is human nature to tend to believe what is visible. When something is visible it means that it is controllable. Humans are afraid of the unknown and losing control. Therefore, construction metaphors, to some extent, make abstract concepts seem less abstract and more familiar to us by concretizing the abstract concept and making it seem more real.
In the same way, seeing history as a construction process makes what seems distant and abstract seem nearer to us. Additionally, the construction metaphor makes us see what we have achieved, thus allowing us to feel a sense of accomplishment because we can vividly see the result. This sense
of accomplishment makes us feel that there is some value in our contributions, and therefore what we have is valuable. This sense of self worth is important for everyone.
The two building metaphors have different focus points: The metaphor HISTORY IS A BUILDING highlights the determination of American people who can take advantage of crises and transform them into the pillars of the building of history. It reveals a positive attitude towards crises. We know that a crisis is a situation full of problems that must be solved quickly in order to avoid the worsening of the situation. To some, it may seem like a pit that is impossible to climb out of. To others, it may be a chance which can be made use of, depending on an attitude people have towards it. The second building metaphor NATION IS A BUILDING highlights the necessity of change in order to maintain and strengthen the foundation of the nation. Here, the speaker emphasizes the importance of change.
The engine metaphor reveals the importance and indispensability of democracy in the country's development. The word "engine" refers to a machine that converts any form of energy into a mechanical force and motion. It serves as an energy source. Without it, any type of machine cannot operate. The illness-curing metaphor suggests that America has a self-healing capacity. The next metaphor is the movement metaphor. Movement is another common phenomenon in our lives. From the metaphorical linguistic expression "the era of deadlock and drift", it can be seen that the country's development is understood in terms of forward-bound movement. No development means no movement, and negative development means directionless movement. The last metaphor is the season metaphor. It refers to changes in social condition.
From the discussion above, we can see from the metaphor cluster that these metaphors are used to describe both the bad past and the promising future. The promising future is guaranteed by the change brought about by what is right with America and the traditional American ideals, such as democracy. Therefore, the metaphor clustering is topical in the inaugural because it helps to elaborate on one of the main topics of the inaugural, i.e. change.
In example (2), the metaphor cluster includes the building metaphor, chorus metaphor, personification, spring metaphor. The first metaphor we will talk about is the spring metaphor. Spring is a natural phenomenon, which relates to the abstract idea of rebirth. Spring is one of the phases in the succession of the four seasons. The succession of the four seasons in itself suggests a sense of determination and assurance, since it is certain that spring must come after winter. Therefore, the spring metaphor has a reassuring function here, making the audience feel certain that new change will come and everything will be better in spring. The spring metaphor ap-
pears in four places throughout the address. It has a cohesive function in terms of text production, it is like a thread running through the inaugural address. It sticks to the theme of the inaugural address, i.e. the renewal of America. Therefore, by using the spring metaphor, Bill Clinton suggests that his presidential term will bring a new and preferable change. Besides this, this spring/season metaphor has the function ofjustifying an argument or enhancing the justification of an argument. The arguments based on the metaphor are justified because they are logically valid.
The related linguistic expressions ofthe spring metaphor are also worth discussing. The linguistic expressions like "Yes, you, my fellow Americans, have forced the spring" reveals the speaker's intention of strengthening the audience's sense of participation in the political process. The second-person pronoun "you" unifies the audience, making each person feel that they are involved in the process which is so important and so grand. The expression "you forced the spring" is rhetorically powerful, but realistically impossible. How could humans "force" the spring? It is an impossibility. Thus, the impossibility makes the activity itself seem so exciting and grand, making the doers feel highly powerful and confident. Therefore, although this expression is realistically impossible, it is rhetorically persuasive. It makes humans feel that they are powerful. This feeling is what matters for humans. Facing nature, humans are small and sometimes powerless, and this frightens them. So, humans seek every means to be powerful and to control everything they possibly can. We can see why such an expression is a powerful and persuasive strategy: It not only satisfies and reassures the audience emotionally, but also makes them feel confident about choosing the president who speaks these words.
In this inaugural, there is a similar expression: "we force the spring". It is functionally similar to what we have discussed, and only differs in the use of pronouns. The first-person plural pronoun "we" includes both the president himself and the whole audience. The use of this pronoun unifies the audience and himself, and the use of the second-person plural pronoun "you" refers to all Americans. When the second-person plural is used, Americans get all the credit for "forcing the spring". Thus, the feeling of power strengthens. The spring metaphor is used to describe the actions that should be taken in this season. Therefore, in the expression "we must do the work the season demands" the season refers to the spring. And in spring, we have to work hard in order to harvest in fall. Spring is the season of beginnings. This sense may be closely related to the tradition of farming. In this season, farmers begin to cultivate their land and harvest all the products of autumn. Therefore, spring is related to the beginning of doing something productive. To relate the concept of spring with work and service is therefore highly convincing to the audience.
Bill Clinton (January 20, 1997)
(1) At the dawn of the 21 century, a free people must now choose to shape the forces of the information age and the global society, to unleash the limitless potential of all our people, and yes, to form a more perfect Union.
When last we gathered, our march to this new future seemed less certain than it does today. We vowed then to set a clear course to renew our Nation. In these 4 years, we have been touched by tragedy, exhilarated by chal-lege, strengthened by achievement. America stands alone as the world's indispensable nation. Once again, our economy is the strongest on Earth. Once again, we are building stronger families, thriving communities, better educational opportunities, a cleaner enviroment..
(2) The divide of race has been America's constant curse. And each new wave of immigrants gives new targets to old prejudices. Prejudice and contempt cloaked in the pretense of religious or political conviction are no different. These forces have nearly destroyed our Nation in the past. They plague us still. They fuel the fanaticism of terror. And they torment the lives of millions in fractured nations all around the world.
These obsessions cripple both those who hate and of course those who are hated, robbing both of what they might become. We cannot, we will not, succumb to the dark impulses that lurk in the far regions of the soul everywhere. We shall overcome them. And we shall replace them with the generous spirit of a people who feel at home with one another. Our rich texture of racial, religious, and political diversity will be a godsend in the 21st century. Great rewards will come to those who can live together, learn together, work together, forge new ties that bind together.
(3) Fellow Americans, we must not waste the precious gift of this time. For all of us are on that same journy of our lives, and our journy, too, will come to an end. But the journey of our America must go on.
And so, my fellow Americans, we must be strong, for there is much to dare. The demands of our time are great, and they are different. Let us meet them with faith and courage, with patience and a grateful, happy heart. Let us shape the hope of this day into the noblest chapter in our history. Yes, let us build our bridge, a bridge wide enough and strong enough for every American to cross over to a blessed land of new promise.
May those generations whose faces we cannot yet see, whose names we may never know, say of us here that we led our beloved land into a new century with the American dream alive for all her children, with the American promise of a more perfect Union a reality for all her people, with America's bright flame of freedom spreading throughout all the world.
From the height of this place and the summit of this century, let us go forth.
MS
^ A^i / \ ^miliy^ AJk A
IT \ J )
MS
Q.
is 0
| 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Sentences
Figure 3: Distribution diagram of metaphorical sentences in the presidential inaugural of Bill Clinton in 1997.
In the second presidential inaugural of Bill Clinton, there are three occurrences of metaphor clustering. In example (1), the metaphor cluster includes the dawn metaphor, journey metaphor, personification NATION IS A PERSON, and the building metaphor. The dawn metaphor is a conventional metaphor, as the phrase "at the dawn of " is equal to "at the beginning of". The journey metaphor is used to recall the change in confidence between the past and present. From the sentences "when last we gathered, our march to this new future seemed less certain than it does today. We vowed then to set a clear course to renew our Nation", we can see that the president implicitly acclaims himself since he describes the "less certain" journey in the past as becoming clearer after his first term and implies that America became the world's most indispensable nation due to his governance. To personify America as a person standing alone is to highlights the image of a hero who is highly important. It is a political strategy to aggrandize America's status in the world. The building metaphor is used to concretize abstract concepts, therefore making the process of change visible and vivid to the audience.
In example (2), the metaphor cluster is based on one target domain with different source domains. The target domain is two kinds of negative attitudes: prejudice and contempt. These forces are metaphorical plagues, fuel, evil powers, robbers, and dark impulses. It is evident that the metaphors in this metaphor cluster are combined and accumulated to strenghthen their power to describe the negative nature of prejudice and contempt. On the contrary, the texture metaphor and tie metaphor presents a positive picture of unity and harmony.
In example (3), the gift metaphor journey metaphor, bridge metaphor, and fire metaphor are connected to each other to present a picture of a traveller on a journey. The target domains in this metaphor cluster are time, human life, the development of a country, history, and freedom. In
this example, the sentences "For all of us are on that same journey of our lives, and our journey, too, will come to an end. But the journey of our America must go on" show the speaker's distinction between a human's life and the development of the country, that is, one is a forward-oriented journey which will come to an end one day, while the other is an endless forward journey.
The journey metaphor, as a spatial movement metaphor, is drawn from the fundamental human experience. Spatial movement is an action performed by humans and other creatures in nature; it is one of the most basic states of life. In political discourse, spatial movement is mostly used to understand the abstract concepts of "growth" or "development". In this inaugural, it can be seen that, among other metaphors, the journey metaphor is relatively frequently used. The repeated use of the journey metaphors creates a coherent cognitive scenario in the address, i.e. everyone is on the same journey to an unknown, but possibly happy, destination. When politicians use journey metaphors, it is often to highlight the action of "going" and possible bright and positive destinations, thus giving their discourse a reassuring function.
Special attention should be paid to Clinton's combining of the journey metaphor with the bridge metaphor. Bill Clinton uses this metapor frequently in his acceptance address in 1996. He uses the bridge metaphor in almost twenty paragraphs in the address, relating his bridge metaphor to a variety of topics. Most of his bridge metaphors are used to acclaim his past accomplishements and future plans. The interdiscursive use of the bridge metaphor not only connects Clinton's different discourses, but also maintains the continuity of metaphor use throughout them.
The fire metaphor is used to understand freedom, depicting an image of fire with flames spreading throughout the entire world. In this example, the understanding of freedom in terms of fire highlights the "brightness" and "rapid dissemination" of fire, among other features. America's freedom is seen as a fire that can rapidly be proliferated and beneficial to other countries.
Fire has rich metaphoric associations. According to Osborn [1967], it is, primarily, a basic condition for human development, providing warmth and cooked food, thus guaranteeing their health and bodily comfort. Secondly, fire relates inseparably to light. In ancient times fire and light went together, both providing the condition for sight. Light can also represent intellectual knowledge, and so can fire. Thirdly, fire can be rapidly reproduced and spread from one place to another, so it can represent the rapid proliferation of something, such as an idea. Fourthly, fire burns and breaks down substances, therefore, it has functions of both purifying and destroying. In this case, fire sometimes relates to the religious notion of purgatory. A good example of the purifying function of fire could be found in the Early Modern period from 15th to 18th of witch-hunts in Early Modern
Europe and Colonial North America, when a lot of so-called "witches" were burned alive.
George W. Bush (January 20, 2001)
(1) I am honored and humbled to stand here where so many ofAmerica's leaders have come before me, and so many will follow. We have a place, all of us, in a long story, a story we continue but whose end we will not see. It is a story of a new world that became a friend and liberator of the old, the story of a slaveholding society that became a servant offreedom, the story of a power that went into the world to protect but not possess, to defend but not to conquer.
It is the American story, a story of flawed and fallible people united across the generations by grand and enduring ideals. The grandest of these ideals is an unfolding American promise that everyone belongs, that everyone deserves a chance, that no insignificant person was ever born.
(2) Americans are called to enact this promise in our lives and in our laws. And though our Nation has sometimes halted and sometimes delayed, we must follow no other course.
Through much of the last century, America's faith in freedom and democracy was a rock in a raging sea. Now it is a seed upon the wind, taking root in many nations. Our democratic faith is more than the creed of our country. It is the inborn hope of our humanity, an ideal we carry but do not own, a trust we bear and pass along. Even after nearly 225 years, we have a long way yet to travel.
(3) Much time has passed since Jefferson arrived for his inauguration. The years and changes accumulate, but the themes of this day, he would know: our Nation's grand story of courage and its simple dream of dignity.
We are not this story's author, who fills time and eternity with his purpose. Yet, his purpose is achieved in our duty. And our duty is fulfilled in service to one another. Never tiring, never yielding, never finishing, we renew that purpose today, to make our country more just and generous, to affirm the dignity of our live and every life. This work continues, the story goes on, and angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.
MS
-i ( X ) » ♦♦ ♦ « ( )
♦MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 Sentences
Figure 4: Distribution diagram of metaphorical sentences in the presidential inaugural of George W. Bush in 2001.
Q.
JS 0
<D
In George W. Bush's first inaugural address, there are three examples of metaphor clustering. In example (1), the story metaphor is repeated, creating a metaphor cluster. The word "story" is used metaphorically, referring to a description of events in a person's life or in the development of a country. When the president says that "we have a place, all of us, in a long story, a story we continue but whose end we will not see", he unifies the audience and gives the whole audience a sense of participation. This also makes such a grand and vague concept ofthe development of a country seem much clearer, since stories are familiar to all of us. Then, the repeated sentence structures of "it is a story of ..." and "it is the American story, a story of." focuses on America's history, and the positive changes America has undertaken over the centuries.
The story metaphor occurs at the beginning of the inaugural and is also repeated at the end of the inaugural. It functions as a cohesive tool to the structure of the address. In example (3), the sentence "we are not this story's author, who fills time and eternity with his purpose. Yet, his purpose is achieved in our duty" shows that although people cannot decide where the story is going, they can meaningfully contribute to the story. The story metaphor in this sentence encourages people to take part in the story process. The story metaphor combines what has happened in the past and what will happen in the future. It contributes to the elaboration of the topic of this address, i.e. past and future. The uses of the story metaphor at the beginning and end of the inaugural echo each other, thus making the address structurally coherent.
In example (2), the president uses a novel metaphor; America's faith in freedom and democracy is seen as "a rock in a raging sea" in the past, and "a seed upon the wind, taking root in many nations" at the time when the address is made. The two images present two different situations of America's faith in freedom and democracy. The comparison between the two images highlights the importance of change; the picture of a rock in a raging sea tells its story of being alone, under great pressure, while the image of a seed upon the wind taking root in many places reveals its vitality and quick dissemination.
Example (2) also includes the spatial movement metaphor and the journey metaphor. The conceptual metaphors NO DEVELOPMENT IS NO MOVEMENT and BAD DEVELOPMENT IS SLOW MOVEMENT are revealed by the relevant metaphorical words and phrases. The verb "halt" describes a situation in which no movement occurs, and the verb "delay" means a movement or process happens slower than usual. In this case, the negative development of a nation is understood in terms of there being no movement at all or slow movement, while the phrase "follow other course" reveals the determination of maintaining walking on the established road. The sentence "we have a long way yet to travel" also manifests the idea that the development of the country is understood in terms of a journey.
George W. Bush (January 20, 2005)
(1) Today I also speak anew to my fellow citizens. From all of you I have asked patience in the hard task of securing America, which you have granted in good measure. Our country has accepted obligations that are difficult to fulfill and would be dishonorable to abandon. Yet because we have acted in the great liberating tradition of this Nation, tens of millions have achieved their freedom. And as hope kindles hope, millions more will find it. By our efforts, we have lit afire as well, afire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power. It burns those who fight its progress. And one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world.
(2) We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom, not because history runs on the wheels of inevitability—it is human choices that move events; not because we consider ourselves a chosen nation—God moves and chooses as He wills. We have confidence because freedom is the permanent hope of mankind, the hunger in dark places, the longing of the soul. When our Founders declared a new order of the ages, when soldiers died in wave upon wave for a union based on liberty, when citizens marched in peaceful outrage under the banner "Freedom Now," they were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled. History has an ebb and flow of justice, but history also has a visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of Liberty.
MS
» ♦ ♦♦<()<►♦♦♦■()
4 MS
Q.
.S 0
20
40 60 Sentences
80
100
Figure 5: Distribution diagram of metaphorical sentences in the presidential inaugural of George W. Bush in 2005.
The second inaugural of George W. Bush includes two examples of metaphor clustering. In example (1), the image of fire is related to the notion of freedom and hope. As discussed above, fire has rich metaphoric associations; it provides warmth and cooked food, thus guaranteeing health and bodily comfort for humans. It relates inseparably to light, which represents intellectual knowledge. It also burns and breaks down substances, therefore it has both purifying and destructive functions. All the characteristics of fire mentioned here can be seen in example (1). The linguistic expression
"hope kindles hope" highlights the ease with which fire spreads, and the sentences "by our efforts, we have lit a fire as well, a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power. It burns those who fight its progress. And one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world" depicts fire in full, with its quality of warmth, purifying force, rapidly-spreading nature, and illumination.
Example (2) includes the journey metaphor, machine metaphor, and sea metaphor. The sentence "we go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom" reveals that the development of a country is a forward-oriented movement. Here, the journey metaphor is combined with the machine metaphor to describe the notion of history. The sentence "We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom, not because history runs on the wheels of inevitability — it is human choices that move events" highlights people's desire to make history. The idea that "history not runs on the wheels of inevitability" may come from Martin Luther King Jr., who once said that "Somewhere along the way — Somewhere we must come to see that human progress never rolls in on the wheels of inevitability. It comes through the tireless efforts and the persistent work of dedicated individuals who are willing to be coworkers with God" in his Methodist Student Leadership Conference Address in 1964. The idea behind these sentences is that change doesn't just happen by itself, instead, you need to work hard for it. History doesn't just happen by itself, instead, humans make history.
The sea metaphor in example (2) comes mainly from the phrase "wave upon wave". The phrase can also be used as "wave after wave", meaning large quantities of something, coming in one wave after another. Here, it is used to describe the high number of soldiers who sacrificed themselves for their nation. The phrase "ebb and flow" means a frequently changing situation. The sentence "history has an ebb and flow ofjustice" reveals how the condition ofjustice changes throughout history. Both examples use the phenomena of sea to describe some change, the first being the quantitative change and the second being the situational change.
Barack Obama (January 20, 2009)
(1) Forty-four Americans have now taken the Presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet every so often, the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because we the people have remained faithful to the ideals of our forebears and true to our founding documents.
(2) In reaffirming the greatness of our Nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of shortcuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the fainthearted,
for those who prefer leisure over work or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things — some celebrated, but more often men and women obscure in their labor — who have carried us up the long, rugged path toward prosperity and freedom.
(3) Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched. But this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control. The Nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our gross domestic product, but on the reach of our prosperity, on our ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart, not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good.
(4) America, in the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our hardship, let us remember these timeless words. With hope and virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents and endure what storms may come. Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end; that we did not turn back, nor did we falter. And with eyes fixed on the horizon and God's grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift offreedom and delivered it safely to future generations.
Figure 6: Distribution diagram of metaphorical sentences in the presidential inaugural of Barack Obama in 2009.
There are four occurrences of metaphor clustering in Barack Obama's first inaugural. In example (1), the nature phenomena related to the sea, like rising tides, still waters, gathering clouds and raging storms are used to describe the situation of the country. Behind these metaphors lies the ship of state metaphor. In western culture, the ship of state is a well-known and oft-used metaphor. Plato, in his Book VI of the Republic, compared the governance of a city-state to steering a ship. In modern American political culture, the ship of state metaphor is a common metaphor in which the image of the state is viewed as a ship in need of a government to command
MS
—m 4 J^^ ¿M^H^ A ^^ AA/MWA A AAA A ^^¿M^l
o l ^ / ' / ^ /
8
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Sentences
♦MS
and control it, and the head of the government is viewed as the captain of the ship. It is clear that Obama uses the ship of state metaphor implicitly here, highlighting the changeable and dynamic situations a ship may meet at sea. Here, the rising tides are used to describe the condition of a country being successful or thriving, the still waters are used to describe its stable condition, and the gathering clouds and raging storms are used to indicate a crisis situation a country may meet. These natural phenomenon metaphors are used to describe all kinds of situations a country may come across, and during these various moments, America "has carried on" due to the faithfulness to the ideals of forbearers and founding documents. The nature phenomenon metaphor is used alongside the movement metaphor, here, to present us with a picture of a ship travelling constantly through the sea, despite facing various challenging situations.
Example (2) and (4) are all about journey metaphors. In example (2), the development of a country is described as a journey: a long, rugged journey with its destination of prosperity and freedom. And only "the doer" instead of "the fainthearted" can arrive at the destination. The journey metaphor, here, is intended to inspire people to work hard to make their country great. In example (4), Obama depicts a determined traveler who keeps going forward despite of the negative situation, such as winter, the icy current and storms. The use ofjourney metaphors runs throughout the address, structurally functioning as a cohesive tool. To describe something as a journey provides a relatively concrete framework for it. When the journey metaphor is used to describe the development of a country, the abstract concept of development seems to possess the characteristics of journey-related, unpredictable circumstances along the way, forward movement, a destination-oriented nature, and, most of all, the desirable and happy end that we have no clear and certain idea of. The journey metaphor, here, is used not only to encourage people, but also to unify people by providing a so-called shared journey experience.
In example (3), the metaphor cluster consists of a machine metaphor and a journey metaphor. The market is seen as a machine which can generate wealth and expand freedom, while also having the potential to fall out of our control if not monitored carefully. Machines are man-made, therefore, they can be operated, checked, regulated, and fixed by people. Therefore, the MARKET IS MACHINE metaphor used by the president reveals a fundamental principle of the Democratic Party, which holds the idea that the economy should be regulated and certain government intervention in the market is necessary.
Barack Obama (January 20, 2013)
(1) We, the people, declare today that the most evident of truths — that all of us are created equal — is the star that guides us still; just as it guided
our forebears through Seneca Falls and Selma and Stonewall; just as it guided all those men and women, sung and unsung, who left footprints along this great Mall, to hear a preacher say that we cannot walk alone; to hear a King proclaim that our individual freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on Earth.
(2) It is now our generation's task to carry on what those pioneers began. For our journey is not complete until our wives, our mothers and daughters can earn a living equal to their efforts. Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law-for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well. Our journey is not complete until no citizen is forced to wait for to exercise the right to vote. Our journey is not complete until we find a better way to welcome the striving, hopeful immigrants who still see America as land of opportunity-until bright young students and engineers are enlisted in our workforce rather than expelled from our country. Our journey is not complete until all our children, from the streets of Detroit to the hills of Appalachia, to the quiet lanes of Newtown, know that they are cared for and cherished and always safe from harm.
That is our generation's task — to make these words, these rights, these values of life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness real for every American. Being true to our founding documents does not require us to agree on every contour of life. It does not mean we all define liberty in exactly the same way or follow the same precise path to happiness. Progress does not compel us to settle centuries-long debates about the role of government for all time, but it does require us to act in our time.
MS
a A^ A . ^mumii^A aa
♦MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 Sentences
Figure 7: Distribution diagram of metaphorical sentences in the presidential inaugural of Barack Obama in 2013.
The two metaphor clusters in Obama's second inaugural all consist of journey metaphors. From the inaugural in 2009 and this inaugural, it can be deduced that Obama predominantly favors journey metaphors. As we
Q.
& 0
have discussed in the paragraph above, the journey metaphor has a special ability to unify and reassure people. The journey metaphor makes the abstract concept of development seem as if it possessed the characteristics of journey-related unpredictable circumstances along the way, forward movement, destination-oriented, and most of all, the desirable and happy end that we have no clear and certain idea of. The journey metaphor is used to make the audience feel as though they have a choice to make, thus to unify them by providing them with a so-called shared journey experience.
The star metaphor in example (1) relates to the idea of equality. Stars at night provide light, and can therefore guide travelers at night. Thus, this presents the idea that equality is necessary for the development of a country, especially in its dark times. In example (2), the sentence structure "For our journey is not complete until..." is repeated five times in the paragraph. The journey metaphor outlines the president's ambitions, or rather, goals for the future. Metaphors, repetition, and parallelism are combined here to fulfill the president's appeal for the necessary changes in the future.
Donald Trump (January 20, 2017)
MS
() ♦ * ♦♦♦♦
< MS
20 40 60 80 100 Sentences
Figure 8: Distribution diagram of metaphorical sentences in the presidential inaugural of Donald Trump in 2017.
(1) But for too many of our citizens a different reality exists: Mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner citizens: rusted-our factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our Nation; an education system, flush with cash, but which leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of all knowledge; and the crime and the gangs and the drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential.
This American carnage stops right here and stops right now. We are one Nation, and their pain is our pain, their dreams are our dreams, and their success will be our success. We share one heart, one home, and one glorious destiny.
Q.
JS 0
Metaphors are somewhat scattered, or located unevenly, in Trump's inaugural. The only instance of metaphor clustering spotted in research is used to describe a frightening image. It includes several conceptual metaphors: the metaphor POVERTY IS A LOCATION, FACTORIES ARE TOMBSTONES, personification CRIMES ARE CRIMINALS, and carnage metaphor SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DESOLATION IS CARNAGE. These metaphors are crowded together to form a very negative image. These metaphors are connected to each other, or rather, all other metaphors are used to serve the dominant metaphor in this clustering — the carnage metaphor.
'Carnage' literally means "great and usually bloody slaughter or injury, as in battle". Trump used it to refer to a social and economic desolation when he said that "This American carnage stops right here and stops right now". However, due to its negative connotations, the word disturbed people by presenting a scary image. This hyperbolic metaphor to some extent influences the assessment of the address. It was harshly criticized by the media as soon as it emerged.
It should be noted that Trump's inaugural is different from the other inaugurals. The traditional aims of presidential address in unifying the two parties and the people and reiterating the traditional American ideas seem to be given less attention. In fact, the address was harshly criticized in the domestic media because of its content and wording. It was branded as an "unprecedented, divisive speech" [Time, 2017], "striking a tone of nationalism and populism" [Wall Street Journal, 2017; Los Angeles Times, 2017], and being "one ofthe most ominous" in U.S. history [Los Angeles Times, 2017].
3.2. Comparison
Regarding significant similarities and differences between the addresses under analysis, tables of comparison have been made, outlining the metaphors in all metaphor clusters of each president and indicating source and target domains.
Table 1. Metaphor types by source domains and target domains in metaphor clusters in George H.W. Bush's presidential inaugural in 1989
1989
Target domain Source domain
Change Breeze
Freedom Refreshing power
Development Forward Movement
History Book (Storybook)
Tomorrow Room
Table 2. Metaphor types by source domains and target domains in metaphor clusters in Bill Clinton's presidential inaugural in 1993 and 1997
1993 1997
Target domain Source domain Target domain Source domain
Change Spring
Freedom Building Freedom Fire
Democracy Engine/Building
Development Movement Development Forward move-
ment/journey
History Building History Book
Nation Building Country Person
Problem and solution Illness-curing
Time Gift
Means to future Bridge
Negative attitudes Plague, fuel, evil
force, robber, dark
impulses
Families, commu- Building
nities, opportuni-
ties, environment
Table 3. Metaphor types by source domains and target domains in metaphor clusters in George W. Bush's presidential inaugural in 2001 and 2005
2001 2005
Target domain Source domain Target domain Source domain
Faith in freedom and democracy Development Country development A rock in a raging sea/ A seed upon the wind Forward movement/ Journey Story Freedom/Hope Development History Fire Forward movement Machine
Table 4. Metaphor types by source domains and target domains in metaphor clusters in Barack Obama's presidential inaugurals in 2009 and 2013
2009 2013
Target domain Source domain Target domain Source domain
Freedom Gift Equality Star
Development Forward Movement/Journey Development Forward movement/Journey
Market Machine
Country situation Rising tides/still waters/gathering clouds/raging storms/ winter/icy currents
Table 5. Metaphor types by source domains and target domains in metaphor clusters in Donald Trump's presidential inaugural in 2017
2017
Source domain Target domain
Location Tombstone Criminal Carnage Poverty Factory Crime Social and economic desolation
The first observation to be made is that Trump's use of metaphor clustering is different from the other four presidents. The only instance of Trump's metaphor clustering is the negative description of social condition. While in the other four presidents' instances, certain target domains-topics are oft-mentioned. They are America's fundamental ideas and the country's development. The topic of development appears in all clusters, and every occurrence is elaborated through the image of a journey. The topic of development is the most important priority for any country, so it comes as no surprise that each president talks about it in his inaugural.
Although each president draws on the fundamental ideas of modern society in their inaugurals, the ideas emphasized through their individual clusters are different. The topic of freedom appears in all the inaugurals. The difference lies in the fact that different source domains are used to describe it. In the clusters of Bush Senior's inaugural, freedom is seen as something that can refresh the nation to help it move forward. The topic of freedom also appears in other places in the inaugural, aside from the clusters. In a simile made especially for children, freedom is described as a beautiful kite. The concept of freedom as fire appears in the clusters of the inaugurals of Bill Clinton (1997) and Bush Junior (2005). As opposed to the fire metaphor, Bill Clinton (1993) views freedom in terms of construction. Obama (2009), in his clusters, speaks about freedom in terms of being a gift, but uses the metaphor of light to discuss freedom in other points of his address. Bush Junior, (2001) when talking about the topic of freedom in his clusters, focuses on the faith in freedom and democracy which was once a rock in a raging sea but then became a seed upon the wind.
Another repeatedly mentioned idea in these clusters is democracy, although it is less frequently mentioned than freedom. Clinton (1993) describes democracy in terms of engines and buildings, while Bush Junior (2001) mentions both freedom and democracy together. Among all the inaugurals and clusters, only Obama (2013) uses metaphors to describe the idea of equality. He uses the star-with-a-journey metaphor to highlight the importance of equality in the development of a country.
Metaphors used for the topic of change only occur in the clusters of the inaugurals of Bush Senior (1989) and Bill Clinton (1993). Bush Senior uses the breeze metaphor, while Bill Clinton (1993) uses the spring metaphor.
It can be seen that in terms of the source domains used in the clusters of these presidents the journey metaphor is oft-used. Furthermore, each president has his own points of focus within the use of source domains: Bush Senior concentrates on his breeze metaphor, Bill Clinton prefers the building metaphor in 1993 and the journey metaphor in 1997, Bush Junior prefers the story metaphor in 2001 and the fire metaphor in 2005, and Obama prefers the journey metaphor in both of his two inaugurals.
Secondly, when we look at how the metaphors in these clusters are organized, most of them are topically related to each other. Some clusters use several source domains to describe a target domain, which illustrates example (2) in Bill Clinton's inaugural (1997): the negative attitudes of prejudice and contempt are seen in terms of the plague, fuel, evil forces, and dark impulse. Some clusters may contain different metaphors to form a multi-detailed image and elaborate a topic, which can be seen in example (3) of Bill Clinton's address (1997): the gift metaphor, journey metaphor, book metaphor, bridge metaphor, and fire metaphor are used to present a picture of the country's ongoing development.
Thirdly, these metaphors play an important role in contributing to some of the main purposes of presidential inaugurals: unification of the country, reiteration of American values, and offering of a bright future. And this phenomenon appears in nearly every instance of clustering.
4. Conclusions
Research into the metaphor clusters in these eight presidential inaugurals shows that metaphor clustering is an integral part of political discourse and it plays a vital role in these inaugurals. Some metaphor clusters involve the important topics of the inaugurals and are used to elaborate upon these abstract notions. Such metaphor clusters exist in almost all the inaugurals, focusing on topics like American values and country development. Some metaphor clusters may be used only to explain an abstract concept, such as prejudice and contempt in Clinton's inaugural (1993). Some metaphor clusters, as in Trump's inaugural (2017), may be used to produce negative images. The very fact that metaphor clusters occur both at the beginning and at the end of an inaugural suggests that they contribute to the form and content of the discourse structure, making it flow more smoothly or cementing the constituent parts. Or they echo each other in order to create a coherent and structurally sound cognitive scenario within each inaugural.
Comparing metaphor clusters in these inaugurals reveals certain similarities and differences of metaphor use. The topics of American values and country development are discussed in each inaugural (except Trump's talk) and in each metaphor cluster. The differences primarily lie in the use of source domains. For example, in Bush Junior's inaugural (2001), the story metaphor is repeated many times; in Clinton's inaugural (1993), the
building metaphor is repeated and even used for different target domains; the journey metaphor is highlighted in Barack Obama's inaugurals (both in 2009 and 2013). Secondly, aside from the fact that Bush Senior's inaugural (1989) and Bill Clinton's inaugural (1993) explicitly use metaphor to elaborate on the topic of change in terms of breeze (Bush Senior) and spring (Bill Clinton), no other inaugurals use metaphors to speak about change. Both the breeze metaphor and the spring metaphor function as a thread running throughout the entirety of the inaugurals, creating cognitive and discursive coherence. This reveals the importance given to the topic of change during Bush Senior's time and Bill Clinton's first term.
Trump's inaugural is an exception in terms of the use of metaphor clustering. It is consistent with the fact that his address is evaluated to be an exception in many aspects, such as negative tone and specific wording. The negative image created by the instance of metaphor clustering brings him harsh criticism.
Studying metaphor clustering provides a different viewpoint on how metaphors are used in political discourse. Crowding in discourse, they are reinforced and, hence, more effective.
References
Cameron, L., Stelma, J. Metaphor Clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied
Linguistics. 2004. 1(2): 107-136. Corts, D., Meyers, K. Conceptual clusters in figurative language production.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2002. 31(4): 391-408. Corts, D., Pollio, H. Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol. 1999. 14(1): 8-100. Cameron L., Low G. Figurative variation in episodes of educational talk and
text. European Journal of English Studies. 2004. 8(3): 355-73. Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Edited with an introduction and notes by J.C.A. Gaskin. N.Y., 1996.
Jamieson, K.H. The metaphoric cluster in the rhetoric of Pope Paul VI and Edmund G. Brown. Jr., Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1980. 66:1, 51-72. Jung, C.G. The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Vol. 9 Part 1. L., 1996.
Koller, V. Metaphor clusters, metaphor chains: analyzing the multifunction-
ality of metaphor in text. Metaphorik 5. 2003. 115-34. Koller, V. Metaphor clusters in Business Media Discourse: A Social Cognition Approach. Dissertation.Vienna University. 2003. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago. 1980. Osborn, M. Archetypal Metaphor in Rhetoric: The light-Dark Family. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1967. Vol. 53, pp. 115-126. Pollio, H.R., Barlow, J.M. A behavioural analysis of figurative language in psychotherapy: One session in a single case study. Language and Speech. 1975. 18, pp. 236-254.
Baranov, A.N., Karaulov, Yu.N. Russkaya politicheskaya metaphora: mate-rialy k slovaryu. [The Russian Political Metaphor: materials for a dictionary. M. Prosveschenie, 1991. 184 p.
Baranov, Yu.N. Descriptornaya teoriya metaphory [A Descriptive Theory of Metaphor]. M. Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. 2014. 632 p.
Budaev, E.V. Sopostavitelnaya politicheskaya metaphorologiya [Contrastive Political Metaphor Studies]. Nizhniy Tagil. NTGSPA. 2011. 330 p.
Gavrilova, M.V. Kognitivniye I ritoricheskiye osnovy prezidenskoi rechi (na materiale vistupleni V.V. Putina I B.N. Eltsina) [Cognitive and rhetorical origins of presidential discourse (A study into V. Putin's and B. Yeltsin's discourses)]. Saint-Petersburg, 2004.
Kaslova, A.A. Metaforicheskoye modelirovanie prezidentskih viborov v Rossii I SShA v 2000. Dissertatsiya kandidata filol. nauk. [Metaphoric modelling of the 2000 Russian presidential vote. Thesis of Candidate of Philology]. Yekaterinburg, 2003. 208 p.
Kobozeva, I.M. Semanticheskiye problemy analiza politicheskoy metafory [Semantic problems of political metaphor research]. Vestnik Moskovsko-go Universiteta [Moscow University Bulletin]. Seriya 9. Filologiya [Series 9. Philology.]. 2001. 6, pp. 132-149.
Kondratieva, O.N., Kovaleeva, K.A. Dinamika metaforicheskih modeley v politicheskoy kommunikatsii (na primere vistupleni Yu. Timoshenko) [Dinamics of metaphoric models in political communication (A study into Yu. Timoshenko's Discourse]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics]. 2016. 4(58), pp. 34-47.
Mukhortov, D.S. Metafora vo vneshnepoliticheskom diskurse kak proyavle-nie obschnosti ideologicheskikh ustanovok agnlosaksonskikh politikov (na materiale vistupleniy B. Obamy, D. Kemerona, T. Ebbota I S. Kharp-era v 2014-2015) [Metaphor in foreign policy discourse as a marker of Anglo-Saxon politicians' shared ideological beliefs: a study of the rhetoric of Barak Obama, David Cameron, Tony Abbott, and Steven Harper in 2014-2015]. Politicheskaya Lingvistika: problematika, metodologiya, as-pekty issledovaniya i perspektivy razvitiya nauchnogo napravleniya: mate-rialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (27 noyab. 2015) / Ural. gos. ped. un-t; gl. red. A.P. Chudinov. [Political Linguistics: Problems, Methods, Aspects of Research and Prospects of Scientific Development: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (November 27, 2015). Ekaterinburg, 2015, pp. 175-182.
Mukhortov, D.S. Praktika kognitivno-diskursivnogo analiza yazykovoy lich-nosti politika (opyt prochteniya publichnykh vystupleniy Billa Klintona) [An experience of cognitive-discursive research into the politician's stylistic behavior]. Kommunikativnye issledovaniya [Communication Research] 2015. № 2 (4). P. 86-95.
Mukhortov, D.S. Sovremennaya yazikovaya lichnost: pragmalingvisticheskiy analiz kommunikatsii [Contemporary Stylistic Behaviour] // v sbornike "Nauka I obschestvo v epokhu tekhnologii I kommunikatsii: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 3 dekabrya 2015" [in Science and Society in the Age of Techology and Communication: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, December 3,
2015"], pod red. Yu.S. Rudenko, N.A. Rybakovoy, E.R. Gatiatullinoy, mesto izdaniya "MYu im. S.Yu.Vitte" [ed. By Yu.S. Redenko, N.A. Ry-bakova, E.R. Galiatullina, published by the Vitte Moscow University], Moscow, 2016, pp. 20-26.
Ji Xiaoxiao. Ob issledovanii metafory v amerikanskom prezisentskom diskurse [Metaphor in American presidential discourse] // Politicheskaya Lingvistika [Political Linguistics]. 2016. No. 6 (60), pp. 239-243.
Ji Xiaoxiao. Osobennosti assotsiativnogo polya ekonomicheskogo dis-kursa Baraka Obamy [Featuring Associations of B. Obama's Economic Discourse] // Politicheskaya Lingvistika [Political Linguistics]. 2016. No. 6 (60), pp. 250-256.
Chudinov, A.P. Rossiya v metaphoricheskom zerkale: kognitivnoe issledo-vaniye politicheskoy metafory (1991-2000): monogr. Ekaterinburg, 2001. 238 p.
Chudinov, A.P. Diskursivnye kharakteristiki politicheskoy kommunikatsii [Discourse Features of Political Communication] // Politicheskaya Lingvistika [Political Linguistics]. 2012. No. 2 (40). P. 53-59.
Chudinov, A.P. Ocherki po sovremennoy politicheskoy metaforologii [Essays in Contemporary Political Metaphor Studies]. Ekaterinburg, 2013. P. 173.
Bender, M.C. Donald Trump Strikes Nationalistic Tone in Inaugural Speech: Historians and speechwriters call the address one of the most ominous entrances ever, reinforcing familiar campaign themes of American decline. The Wall Street Journal. January 20, 2017, Available: https://www. wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-strikes-nationalistic-tone-in-inaugural-speech-1484957527? tesla=y&mod=e2tw. Accessed 27 March 2018.
Bierman, N. Donald Trump delivers short, populist inaugural address. Los Angeles Times. January 20, 2017, Available: http://www.latimes.com/na-tion/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-updates-donald-trump-delivers-short-populist-1484934128-htmlstory.html. Accessed 27 March 2018.
Drehle, D.von. Donald Trump's unprecedented, divisive speech. Time, January 20, 2017, Available: http://time.com/4641547/inauguration-2017-donald-trump-america-first/ Accessed 27 March 2018.
Д.С. Мухортов, Цзи Сяосяо
МЕТАФОРИЧЕСКИЕ КЛАСТЕРЫ В ИНАУГУРАЦИОННЫХ ВЫСТУПЛЕНИЯХ АМЕРИКАНСКИХ ПРЕЗИДЕНТОВ: ОТ ДЖ. БУША-СТ. ДО ДОНАЛЬДА ТРАМПА
Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова» 119991, Москва, Ленинские горы, 1
В данной статье анализируется прагматическое значение метафорических кластеров в инаугурационных выступлениях американских президен-
тов c 1988 по 2018 г. Утверждается, что с точки зрения текстообразования кластеры способствуют выстраиванию дискурса, структурированию его логики, достижению главных прагматических задач выступающего и акцентированию затрагиваемых им в речи проблем и вопросов. Проведенный анализ восьми инаугурационных выступлений выявляет ряд закономерностей и указывает на существующие идиолектные различия в плане использования метафор, которые — по воле спичрайтера или не зависимо от нее — создают кластеры и тем самым усиливают метафорический потенциал текста. Так, отмечается тот факт, что в семи речах, за исключением выступления Трампа, центральной темой, описываемой метафорами, являются фундаментальные американские ценности. Различия в использовании метафор носят субъективный характер. У каждого президента появляется свой — или навязанный спичрайтером — образ, который встречается чаще других. Он также становится одним из магистральных, и ему отводится роль кластерообразователя. Примером является метафора breeze в речи Дж. Буша-старшего. В статье утверждается, что смена тональности и образности в инаугурационных метафорических кластерах может подвергнуть политика острой критике со стороны истеблишмента или общества, что было продемонстрировано неортодоксальным поведением Дональда Трампа.
Ключевые слова: концептуальная метафора; инаугурационное выступление президента страны; метафорический кластер; метафорические отношения; связность дискурса; функции метафоры.
Сведения об авторах: Мухортов Денис Сергеевич — кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры английского языкознания МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова (e-mail: [email protected]); Цзи Сяосяо — аспирант кафедры английского языкознания МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова (e-mail: [email protected]).
Список литературы
Cameron, L., Stelma, J. Metaphor Clusters in discourse// Journal of Applied
Linguistics. 2004. 1(2): 107-136. Corts, D., Meyers, K. Conceptual clusters in figurative language production //
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.2002.31(4): 391-408. Corts, D., Pollio, H. Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures // Metaphor and Symbol. 1999. 14(1): 8-100. Cameron, L., Low G. Figurative variation in episodes of educational talk and
text // European Journal of English Studies. 2004.8(3): 355-73. Hobbes, T: Leviathan. Edited with an introduction and notes by J.C.A. Gaskin. New York, 1996.
Jamieson, K.H. The metaphoric cluster in the rhetoric of Pope Paul VI and Edmund G. Brown// Jr., Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1980. 66:1, 51-72 Jung, C.G. The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Vol.9 Part 1. London. 1996.
Koller, V. Metaphor clusters, metaphor chains: analyzing the multifunctionality of metaphor in text // Metaphorik 5. 2003. 115-34.
Koller, V. Metaphor clusters in Business Media Discourse: A Social Cognition Approach. Dissertation.Vienna University. 2003.
Lakoff, G, Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago. 1980.
Osborn, M. Archetypal Metaphor in Rhetoric: The light-Dark Family // Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1967. Vol. 53. P. 115-126.
Pollio, H.R., Barlow, J.M. A behavioural analysis of figurative language in psychotherapy: One session in a single case study // Language and Speech. 1975. 18. P. 236-254.
Баранов А.Н., Караулов Ю.Н. Русская политическая метафора: материалы к словарю. М.: Просвещение, 1991. 184 с.
Баранов А.Н. Дескрипторная теория метафоры. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2014. 632 с.
Будаев Э.В. Сопоставительная политическая метафорология. Нижний Тагил: НТГСПА, 2011. 330 с.
Гаврилова М.В. Когнитивные и риторические основы президентской речи (на материале выступлений В.В. Путина и Б.Н. Ельцина). СПб, 2004.
Каслова А.А. Метафорическое моделирование прези-дентских выборов в России и США (2000 г.): Дисс. ... канд. филол. наук. Екатеринбург, 2003. 208 с.
Кобозева И.М. Семантические проблемы анализа политической метафоры // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 9: Филология. 2001. № 6. С. 132-149.
Кондратьева О.Н. Ковалеева К.А. Динамика метафорических моделей в политической коммуникации (на примере выступлений Ю. Тимошенко) // Политическая лингвистика. 2016. № 4 (58). C. 34-47.
Мухортов Д.С. Метафора во внешнеполитическом дискурсе как проявление общности идеологических установок англосаксонских политиков (на материале выступлений Б. Обамы, Д. Кэмерона, Т. Эб-ботта и С. Харпера в 2014-2015 гг.) // Политическая лингвистика: проблематика, методология, аспекты исследования и перспективы развития научного направления: материалы Междунар. науч. конф. (27 нояб. 2015 г.) / Урал. гос. пед. ун-т; гл. ред. А.П. Чудинов. Екатеринбург, 2015. C. 175-182.
Мухортов Д.С. Практика когнитивно-дискурсивного анализа языковой личности политика (опыт прочтения публичных выступлений Билла Клинтона). Коммуникативные исследования. 2015. № 2 (4). С. 86-95.
Мухортов Д.С. Современная языковая личность: прагмалингвисти-ческий анализ коммуникации. В сборнике «Наука и общество в эпоху технологий и коммуникаций: материалы международной научно-практической конференции. 3 декабря 2015 года» / Под ред. Ю.С. Руденко, Н.А. Рыбаковой, Э.Р. Гатиатуллиной, место издания ЧОУВО «МУ им. С.Ю. Витте» Москва, 2016. C. 20-26.
Цзи Сяосяо Об исследовании метафоры в американском президентском дискурсе // Политическая лингвистика. 2016. № 4 (58). C. 239-243.
Цзи Сяосяо Особености ассоциативного поля экономического дискурса Барака Обамы // Политическая лингвистика. 2016. No. 6(60). С. 250-256.
Чудинов А.П. Россия в метафорическом зеркале: когнитивное исследование политической метафоры (1991-2000): моногр. Екатеринбург, 2001. 238 с.
Чудинов А.П. Дискурсивные характеристики политической коммуникации // Политическая лингвистика. 2012. 2 (40). С. 53-59.
Чудинов А.П. Очерки по современной политической метафорологии. Екатеринбург, 2013. 176 с.
Bender, M.C. Donald Trump Strikes Nationalistic Tone in Inaugural Speech: Historians and speechwriters call the address one of the most ominous entrances ever, reinforcing familiar campaign themes of American decline. The Wall Street Journal. January 20, 2017. Available: https://www. wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-strikes-nationalistic-tone-in-inaugural-speech-1484957527? tesla=y&mod=e2tw. Accessed 27 March 2018.
Bierman, N. Donald Trump delivers short, populist inaugural address. Los Angeles Times. January 20, 2017. Available: http://www.latimes.com/ nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-updates-donald-trump-delivers-short-populist-1484934128-htmlstory.html. Accessed 27 March 2018.
Drehle, D. von. Donald Trump's unprecedented, divisive speech. Time, January 20, 2017. Available: http://time.com/4641547/inauguration-2017-donald-trump-america-first/. Accessed 27 March 2018.
