CC BY
36ORRM
'medical sciences
OPEN
MENTAL HEALTH DURING THE COVID-19 QUARANTINE IN FIVE COUNTRIES
Erika Yohanna BEDOYA CARDONA1, Ioana POPA2, Anna MORANDI2, Cristina MONTOMOLI2
1University Cooperativa of Colombia, Colombia 2University of Pavia, Italy
Corresponding author: Erika Yohanna Bedoya Cardona, e-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.38045/ohrm.2021.4.06 CZU: 616.89:616.98:578.834.1
Keywords: mental health, COVID-19, quarantine, pandemic.
Cuvinte cheie:
sänätate mintalä, COVID-19, carantinä, pandemie.
Introduction. As part of the holistic concept of health, mental health can be focused on prevention of contagion and coping with the disease and its consequences in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic. The present study describes, compares, and analyzes the association of the impact of the event, perceived stress, coping strategies, emotional regulation, and sociodemographic characteristics during the quarantine in various countries. Material and methods. This research is a multicentric and epidemiological study with a convenience online snowball sampling of the general population and university students. Results. 1.179 participants from Colombia, Brazil, Mexico, Italy, and Spain responded to the survey. Most of them included students and workers, with a high educational level and living with family during the quarantine. There are significant differences in the medians of all variables among countries and sociodemographic characteristics. The variables positively and significantly associated with the impact of the event during quarantine included the perceived stress, the coping strategies of alcohol/drug use, planning and active coping, focus on emotions and vent, the emotional regulation strategy expressive suppression, and living in Italy.
Conclusions. These results have contributed to the understanding of mental, emotional, and behavioral response to quarantine, as well as underline the urgency of monitoring mental health among the vulnerable groups, in order to design specific prevention and intervention programs.
SANATATEA MINTALA IN TIMPUL CARANTINEI COVID-19 IN CINCI TARI Introducere. Ca parte a conceptului holistic de sanatate, in actuala pandemie COVID-19, sanatatea mintala presupune prevenirea contagiunii si gestionarea bolii si a consecintelor acesteia. Prezentul studiu descrie, compara si analizeaza asocierea impactului evenimentu-lui, stresului perceput, strategiilor de adaptare, reglarii emotionale si a caracteristicilor sociodemografice in timpul carantinei in diferite tari.
Material si metode. Studiu epidemiologic multicentric, cu o esantionare conventionala de tipul„bulgari de zapada" online a populatieigenerale si a studentilor universitari. Rezultate. A fost realizat un sondaj la care au participat 1.179 de respondenti din Columbia, Brazilia, Mexic, Italia si Spania. Majoritatea dintre ei sunt studenti si muncitori, cu un nivel ridicat de educatie, care au locuit cu familia in timpul carantinei. Exista diferente semnificative intre medianele tuturor variabilelor intre tari si caracteristici sociodemografice. Variabilele asociate pozitiv si semnificativ, cu impactul evenimentului in timpul carantinei, includ: stresul perceput, consumul de alcool/droguri, planificarea si gestionarea activa, concentrarea asupra emotiilor, strategia de reglare emotionala, suprimarea expresiva si locuirea in Italia.
Concluzii. Aceste rezultate contribuie la intelegerea reactiilor mintale, emotionale si com-portamentale in timpul carantinei si releva necesitatea monitorizarii urgente a sanatatii mintale in grupurile vulnerabile in scopul proiectarii unor programe specifice de prevenire si de interventie.
ORRM
INTRODUCTION
In the current COVID-19 pandemic, governments responded urgently to the biological threat and economic concerns, however, little effort has been directed to the mental health of the general population (1), which is part of the holistic concept of health, even though it is well known that experiences of quarantine can generate mental health effects (2-10). For example, during the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) Sim et al. (11), in a study on the general population in Singapore found that psychiatric morbidity was associated with being put in fever stations, younger age, increased sense of guilt, and less substance use, while post-traumatic morbidity was associated with greater use of the coping strategies as denial and planning. On the other hand, Main et al. (12) showed that the number of stressors and the use of avoidance coping strategies positively predicted psycho-logical symptoms. Active coping positively predicted life satisfaction when controlling for stressors. Additionally, all types of coping served as a buffer against the negative impact of stressors on perceived overall health. During the 2015 Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic, Khalid et al. (13) investigated emotions, perceived stressors, and coping strategies in healthcare personnel working in a hospital in Jeddah (Saudi Arabia), finding that as a coping strategy, positive attitudes in the workplace, clinical improvement of infected colleagues, and interruption of disease transmission among healthcare workers after taking strict protective measures eased their fear.
The complexity of the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide, the socio-economic, political, and cultural situation in every single country, where there are many differences in terms of contagion containment measures, restrictions, laws, and sanctions, government and health authorities' management of the situation, type of information disseminated by media, resources available for diagnoses, treatments, and aid, number of infections and deaths, job and economic losses, etc., leads us to wonder about the psychological impact of the quarantine measures and all their implications. For example, during the initial stage of the outbreak, Wang et al. (14) showed that female gender, being a student, physical symptoms (e.g. myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor health were significantly associated with a
higher psychological impact, stress, anxiety, and depression. Up-to-date and accurate specific health information (e.g. on treatment and on the local outbreak situation), and particular precautionary measures (e.g. hand hygiene and wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact, stress, anxiety, and depression. Therefore, it is important to know the perception, beliefs, emotions, and reactions regarding quarantine, since a measure of such a magnitude and length of time, even if it is taken for the good of the population, can usually generate psychological distress (15).
To date, most of the studies on the subject carried out in Asian, North American, European, and Australian countries are retrospective, have evaluated compliance with quarantine measures using ad-hoc scales, and used standardized scales to measure psychological variables, in healthcare personnel, in specific populations subjected to isolation, and in university students. The present study differs from other studies as it seeks to compare the impact of the event, perceived stress, coping strategies, emotional regulation as components of mental health, and soci-odemographic characteristics such as gender, age, education level, occupation, and cohabiting during the first phase of the COVID-19 quarantine, in a sample of the general population and university students from various countries in Europe and Latin America.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
An observational and multicentric study was carried out by Universities in Colombia, Italy, Spain, Mexico, Brazil, and an international NGO (Spain). The type of sampling was a non-probabilistic snowball since a digital questionnaire was sent through a link by email, WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, etc. Participants were asked to share the link with their contacts. Data were collected in all the countries involved between April and June 2020. Online consent was obtained from participants. The survey was anonymous, and confidentiality of information was assured. Since the online questionnaire design contained the forced answering option, there are no missing data.
The survey was completed by 1.179 participants (27.48% male) aged between 15 to 76 years (m=33.52, SD=13.4) from Colombia (N=356),
ORRM
Brazil (N=364), Mexico (N=202), Italy (N=166), and Spain (N=91). The first part of the digital questionnaire contained socio-demographic questions about gender, age, education level, occupation, and cohabiting during the first phase of the COVID-19 quarantine. Then the following instruments were included:
1. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R; 16-18) is a 22-item self-report scale designed to assess current subjective distress resulting from a traumatic life event, which in the current study corresponded to quarantine. The Cronbach's alphas in the present study for the total scale in the total sample and the Spanish version were .95, for the Portuguese and Italian versions were .94. For the subscales, the Avoidance Cronbach's alphas for the total sample and the Portuguese version were .85, for the Spanish version was .87, and for the Italian version was .80. The Intrusion Cronbach's alphas for the total sample and the Portuguese version were .90, for the Spanish version was .91, and for the Italian version was .89. And the Hyperarousal Cronbach's alphas for the total sample, the Spanish and Portuguese versions were .87, and for the Italian version was .86.
2. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14 items; 19-21) contains 14 items assessing perceived stress in unexpected situations during the last month. The Cronbach's alphas for the total sample and all versions in the three languages were .87.
3. The Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE; 22, 23) contains 60 items evaluating 15 coping strategies. The Cronbach's alpha for the total scale in the total sample was .87, for the Spanish version .89, Italian version .85, and Portuguese version 88. While for the subscales, Cronbach's alphas range from .77 to .95 for the total sample, .76 to .95 for the Spanish version, .74 to .96 for the Italian version, and .71 to .95 for the Portuguese version.
4. The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ; 24-26) is a self-report questionnaire that consists of two scales corresponding to two emotional regulation strategies: Cognitive reappraisal (6 items) and expres sive suppression (4 items). The Cronbach's alpha
for the total sample was .79, for the Spanish version was .78, Portuguese and Italian versions were .80. For the subscales, the Cognitive reappraisal Cronbach's alphas for the total sample and the Spanish version were.71, for the Portuguese version was .73, and for the Italian version was .75. The Expressive suppression Cronbach's alphas for the total sample was .87, for the Portuguese version was .86, and for the Spanish and Italian versions were .88.
Cronbach's alpha was calculated to estimate the internal consistency of the scales and subscales in the total sample and the three versions by language. Normality tests were performed to identify the type of distribution of each variable (Kolmogorov-Smirnov), finding that none of them exhibited a normal distribution. Then, non-parametric statistics were performed. To compare differences in medians, Kruskal-Wallis tests with posthoc pairwise comparisons using Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction were employed. Spearman correlations were used to explore the relationship between the different variables. Finally, to analyze the association of the impact of the event (as a continuous variable) with perceived stress, coping strategies, emotional regulation, and socio-demographic variables, Generalized Linear Models (GLM) were employed. These are an extension of linear models that allow the use of non-normal distributions and non-constant variances, with a Gaussian distribution and link = Identity. The final multivariate GLM was selected by using the lowest Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), the normal residual distribution, and the inflation factor of variance (VIF) to verify the absence of multicollinearity in post-estimation tests. In all analyses p<.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis was performed using the STATA 16 Software.
RESULTS
Table 1 shows that the greatest part of the sample is made of women, youth, and adults, with a high level of education, most of whom are devoted to studying and working, and the majority were living with family during the quarantine period.
In the present study, all the instruments pre sented good internal consistency. Nevertheless, since for the comparison of groups, Cronbach's
ORRM
Table 1. Distribution of the study population by sociodemographic characteristics and countries.
Variables Total Sample Countries N(%)
N l%Oj Colombia Brazil Mexico Italy Spain
Gender
Male 324(27.5) 113(31.7) 83(22.8) 53(26.2) 38(22.9) 37(40.6)
Female 855(72.5) 243(68.3) 281(77.2) 149(73.8) 128(77.1) 54(59.3)
Age (Years)
15 - 44 693(58.8) 211(59.3) 196(53.8) 146(72.3) 96(57.8) 44(48.4)
45 - 76 486(41.2) 145(40.7) 168(46.1) 56(27.7) 70(42.2) 47(51.6)
Education Level
Elementary/High school 311(26.4) 81(22.8) 57(15.7) 46(22.8) 80(48.2) 47(51.6)
Professional /Postgraduate 868(73.6) 275(77.2) 307(84.3) 156(77.2) 86(51.8) 44(48.4)
Occupation
Student & worker 534(45.3) 169(47.5) 136(37.4) 127(62.8) 70(42.2) 32(35.2)
Worker & Other 645(54.7) 187(52.5) 228(62.6) 75(37.1) 96(57.8) 59(64.8)
Live with
Family 1106(94.1) 341(95.8) 339(94.2) 201(99.5) 141(84.9) 84(92.3)
Alone or Roommates 69 (5.9) 15(4.2) 21(5.8) 1(0.5) 25(15.0) 7 (7.7)
alpha values from 0.7 to 0.8 are considered satisfactory (27), in the present study only the COPE subscales with values above .70 have been used for analysis. In Table 2, it can be seen that there are significant differences in all variables between all countries, except in cognitive reappraisal. The medians of the impact of the event are lower in Colombia and Mexico. The median of perceived stress in Colombia is lower than in the other countries. Also, the median of perceived stress in Mexico is lower than in Brazil. Concerning differences in the medians of coping strategies, Brazil's median of seeking social support is higher than Colombia, Mexico, and Spain. The medians show that turning to religion is less used in European countries; humour is less used in Colombia and Mexico than in Spain; alcohol-drug use in Colombia is lower than in Brazil and Italy; planning and active coping is most used in Colombia and Brazil; focusing on emotions and vent is higher in Brazil; positive reinterpretation is higher in Colombia. Finally, the expressive suppression emotional regulation strategy is higher in Spain.
Table 3 shows that there are significant differences for almost all the socio-demographic characteristics, except among cohabiting groups for which differences were found only in turning to religion and expressive suppression (higher medians in those living with family). The medians of the impact of the event, perceived stress, and focus on emotions and vent are higher in women,
people under 45 years, with low educational levels, and students. At the same time, seeking for social support and turning to religion is higher in women, adults over 45 years, with high educational level, being workers and other (housewives and pensioners), and the same for positive reinterpretation and cognitive reinterpretation, except for the gender for which there were no differences. On the other hand, the medians of humor are higher in men with a high educational level, while the consumption of alcohol or drugs is higher in young men. Planning is higher in men, adults, with a high educational level, workers and other (housewives and pensioners). Finally, expressive suppression is higher in men who live with relatives.
Spearman's correlations among the Impact of Event with Perceived Stress, Coping Strategies, and Emotional Regulation were made. The positive correlations with perceived stress, social support, alcohol and drug use, focus on emotion and vent, and expressive suppression; and the negative correlations with religion, planning, positive reinterpretation, and cognitive reappraisal correspond to what is theoretically expected It was found that only Humour does not present a statistically significant correlation with the Impact of the event, while moderate and weak, but statistically significant correlation coefficients were found with the other variables (tab. 4). There was no multicollinearity among variables.
ORRM
Table 2. Comparison of medians (IQR) of Impact of the Event, Perceived Stress, Coping Strategies, and
Emotional Regulation by Countries
Impact Coping Strategies Emotional Regulation
Total Sample ofthe PS Event SSS TRL HUM ADU PAC FEV PRI CR ES
29(30) 26(14) 19(8) 10(8) 7(6) 4(0) 14(5) 8(4) 8(3) 31(11) 14(8)
1 Colombia 26(32) 23(12) 18(9) 11(6) 8(5) 4(0) 15(6) 8(4) 9(3) 32(10 15(7)
2 Brazil 32(28) 29(13) 20(7) 11(7) 7(4,5) 4(1) 15(6) 9(3) 8(3) 31(10) 14(7)
3 Mexico 22(29) 26(14) 18(9) 10.5(7) 8(7) 4(0) 14(6) 8(5) 8(4) 31(11) 14(8)
4 Italy 34(29) 28(12) 19(7) 4(4) 6(4) 4(0) 14(6) 8(4) 8(4) 29(9) 13(8)
5 Spain 37(32) 28(14) 19(9) 4(5) 8(7) 4(2) 13(5) 9(4) 8(3) 31(13) 15(10)
Total Differ" **** **** Í¡cí¡CÍ¡CÍ|C ** ** **** **** * ND **
1:2**** 1^**** 4:1**** 1:3**
Differences among countriesb 1:4**** 1:3* 2:1*** 4:2**** 1:5*** 3:5** 1:2* 1:4** 1:4*** 2:1**** 2:3*** 2:5**
1:5** 1:4**** 3:2** 1:5**** 3:4** 2:3*** 3:5* * 2:3*** 2:5** 4:3**** 5:1**** 5:2**** 5:3**** 1:5*** 2:3** 2:4*** 2:5** 1:4** 1:5*
Note: aKruskal Wallis; bDunntest with Bonferroni correction; ****p < .0001. ***p < .001. **p < .01. *p < .05.
IQR - Interquartile range; PS - Perceived Stress; SSS - Seeking social support; TRL - Turning to Religion; HUM -Humour; ADU - Alcohol-drug use; PAC - Planning and active coping; FEV - Focus on emotions and vent; PRI -Positive reinterpretation; CR - Cognitive Reappraisal; ES - Expressive Suppression; TD - Total Difference; ND - No Differences
Table 3. Comparison of medians (IQR) of Impact of the Event, Perceived Stress, Coping Strategies, and Emotional Regulation by Sociodemographic Characteristics.
Socio- _Coping Strategies_Emotional Regulation
demographic Impact of
Characteristics the Event PS SSS TRL HUM ADU PAC FEV PRI CR ES
Gender **** **** *** **** **** ** ** **** ND ND ****
Male 24(30) 23(12) 18(7.5) 9(8) 8(6) 4(1) 15(6) 8(3) 8(3) 30(11.5) 15.5(8)
Female 32(30) 28(13) 19 (7) 10(8) 7(5) 4(0) 14(5) 9(4) 8(3) 31(10) 14(7)
Age (Years) **** **** ND **** ND ** **** **** **** **** ND
(15 - 44) 33(32) 29(13) 18(8) 9(9) 7(6) 4(1) 14(6) 9(4) 8(3) 30(11) 14(8)
(45 - 76) 25(27) 22(12) 19(7) 11(6) 7(6) 4(0) 16(5) 8(3) 9(3) 32(9) 14(8)
Education Level **** **** **** **** ** ND **** ** **** **** ND
Elementary/ High school 36(33) 29(13) 18(7) 8(8) 7(5) 4(1) 13(5) 9(4) 8(3) 29(12) 14(8)
Professional/ Postgraduate 27.5(30) 25(12) 19(7) 10(8) 8(5) 4(0) 15(6) 8(3) 9(3) 32(10) 14(8)
Occupation **** **** ** ** ND ND **** **** **** **** ND
Student/ Worker 34.5(32) 29.5(13) 18(8) 9(9) 7(6) 4(1) 13(5) 9(5) 8(3) 30(11) 14(8)
Worker / Other 25(28) 23(13) 20(7) 10(8) 7(5) 4(0) 15(5) 8(3) 9(3) 31(9) 14(8)
Live with ND ND ND **** ND ND ND ND ND ND **
Family 29(29) 26(14) 19(8) 10(8) 7(6) 4(0) 14(5) 8(4) 8(3) 31(11) 14(8)
Alone or Roommates 35(30 27(15) 20(8) 7(8) 7(4) 4(1) 15(5) 9(5) 8(2) 30(10) 12(9)
Note: aKruskal Wallis; bDunntest with Bonferroni correction; ****p < .0001. ***p <. 001. **p < .01. *p <. 05.
IQR - Interquartile range; PS - Perceived Stress; SSS - Seeking social support; TRL - Turning to Religion; HUM -
Humour; ADU - Alcohol-drug use; PAC - Planning and active coping; FEV - Focus on emotions and vent; PRI -
Positive reinterpretation; CR - Cognitive Reappraisal; ES - Expressive Suppression; TD - Total Difference; ND - No
Differences.
ORRM
Table 5 shows that the most functional multivar-iate GLM to explain the Impact of the event during the quarantine period includes perceived stress, the coping strategies Alcohol-drug use,
Planning and active coping, and Focus on emotions and vent, the emotional regulation strategy Expressive Suppression, and living in Italy.
Table 4. Spearman correlation of Impact of Event with Perceived Stress, Coping Strategies,
and Emotional Regulation.
_Impact of Event
Perceived Stress
.62*
Seeking social support
.13*
Coping Strategies
Emotional Regulation
Turning to religion -.08**
Humour -.00
Alcohol-drug use 25***
Planning and active coping - 09**
Focus on emotions and vent 53***
Positive reinterpretation -17***
Cognitive Reappraisal -13***
Expressive Suppression
.11*
Note: *** p < .0001. ** p < .01. * p <. 05.
Table 5. Multivariate GLM of Impact of Event with Perceived Stress, 7 Coping Strategies,
Emotional Regulation, and Country.
Impact of Event Coef. Standard Error z P> | z | 95% Conf. Interval
Perceived Stress .92 .06 14.7 .001 .80 1.04
Coping Strategies
Alcohol-drug use .77 .17 4.33 .001 .42 1.12
Planning and active coping .49 .12 4.03 .001 .25 .73
Focus on emotions and vent 1.9 .19 10.07 .001 1.54 2.28
Emotional Regulation
Expressive Suppression .44 .08 5.62 .001 .29 .60
Country (Ref. Colombia)
Brazil -.99 1.09 -.91 .364 -3.15 1.15
Mexico -.83 1.27 -.66 .512 -3.32 1.65
Spain 1.45 1.70 .85 .395 -1.89 4.79
Italy 4.75 1.34 3.47 .001 2.07 7.43
DISCUSSIONS
Results show statistically significant differences in all variables among countries. Although earlier studies have compared psychological aspects during quarantine and the COVID-19 pandemic in different countries (7, 28), not all of them have included the same countries or instruments as the present study. However, given that the orientations of the citizens of the same country tend to be shaped by a national culture (29), it is expected that there will be cross-cultural differences to assess stressors and implement coping strategies (30). Nevertheless, it is possible to argue that the differences among countries in the present study, in addition to cultural factors
(31), could be due to less restrictive and less clear containment, quarantine, and isolation measures in Latin America than in Europe (7, 32). For example, it can be observed that in Italy and Spain the state of alarm and the quarantine measures have lasted longer because there the outbreak occurred earlier than in Latin American countries, and to date, some restrictions still exist. Another crucial aspect is the term applied to the contagion containment measures and the effect that this can generate on the citizens' perception: in Italy, they were referred to as lock-down, in Spain as confinement, in Brazil as social distancing, in Colombia as preventive isolation and in Mexico as healthy distance. Despite these
ORRM
elements, it is important to continue analyzing how cultural factors can contribute to the success or failure of measures to contain the pandemic at a global level.
Regarding the sociodemographic characteristics, the medians of the impact of the event, perceived stress, and focus on emotions and vent are higher in women, people under 45 years, with low educational levels, and students. At the same time, seeking for social support and turning to religion is higher in women, adults over 45 years, with high educational level, being workers and other (housewives and pensioners), and the same for positive reinterpretation and cognitive reinterpretation, except for the gender for which there were no differences. On the other hand, the medians of humor are higher in men with a high educational level, while the consumption of alcohol or drugs is higher in young men. Planning is higher in adult men, people with a high educational level, workers, housewives, and pensioners. Finally, expressive suppression is higher in men who live with relatives. These results are consistent with those reported in previous studies (2, 33-35) which are explained by the characteristics of women's role in society, which implies an overload of responsibilities, in the workplace, at home, and in child and family care (36). On the other hand, within the age groups it was found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, stress levels were higher in people under 45 years of age (37), who, according to Salari et al. (9), are more concerned about the consequences at a professional and economic level. Furthermore, young people are more exposed to large amounts of information through social networks and media (38-40). Also, it may be hypothesized that younger people have not developed yet the emotional maturity to deal with situations of frustration. Another source of discomfort is the fact that their socialization and learning processes have been interrupted (41).
There are also differences in perceived stress between the educational levels since people with a low educational level tend to make more use of unreliable media and are more influenced by conspiracy theories (39, 40). Moreover, regarding occupation, there are differences between students and workers, and workers and others (i.e. housewives, unemployed, and retired people). Nonetheless, as reported in previous investigations (42), students were the most stressed
category during quarantine. Despite quarantine and all the changes, it entailed from a professional viewpoint, causing an increase in the burden for a large part of the workers, it can be argued that being employed in these pandemic circumstances turns out to be a protective factor not only against possible financial losses, but it also can help maintain well-being, support among colleagues and sense of life (43).
The results about coping strategies and emotional regulation are similar to those reported by Eisenbarth (44) and Makarowski et al. (28) and can be explained according to Sica et al. (23), who stated that gender-related differences in the adoption of coping strategies can be attributed to differences in the stressful situations that are faced: as a matter of fact, women usually face more stressful circumstances associated with family care and health, while men deal with situations more related to work and financial difficulties. Concerning age groups, results are consistent with previous research demonstrating that young people tend to use less active coping strategies than adults (23). As regarding the educational and occupational level, it may be hypothesized that the use of some strategies may be associated with the age and the most used strategies in each group. Furthermore, these results are similar to the ones reported by Pieh et al. (45) and Prati (8) showing that adults under 35 years of age, women, the unemployed, people living alone, and with low-income present the most severe mental health problems.
To explain the association between the impact of the event with perceived stress, coping strategies, and emotional regulation, Lazarus and Folkman (46) proposed that there were two general types of coping with stress: the first, termed problem-focused, is aimed at doing something to solve the situation or modify the stress, whereas the second, the emotion-focused, is aimed at reducing the emotional distress. However, this does not mean that they are positive or negative. People sometimes use adaptive or non-adaptive strategies, and this may be linked to the fact that reactions to the same stimulus are different and may vary depending on circumstances. For example, social support is only a small part of the negative consequences of a stressful event, while personal coping resources can reduce its negative impact. On the other hand, the weak and moderate correlations
ORRM
in the present study can be explained according to the fact that people facing stressful experiences can deploy various coping strategies that may be theoretically considered mutually exclusive, and at a pragmatic level they may operate independently depending on the situation, context, timing, etc. (47), as found in our GLM.
The most functional model to predict perceived stress during quarantine includes different coping and emotional regulation strategies that should not be dichotomously considered, but should rather be interpreted according to the function they fulfill when used in a specific situation. Given that coping responses try to reduce the stressful situation (46), some reactions are
CONCLUSIONS
more functional than others, such as the ones found in the present study aimed at directly facing the problem (planning and active coping). In contrast, those trying to mitigate the discomfort (drug or alcohol use, focus on emotion and vent, and expressive suppression), that may be better for well-being in the short term - for example during the quarantine period - although they are only fulfilling a merely palliative function without modifying the source of stress (48), in the long term, they can affect the quality of life and psychological well-being, since it has been found that people who make more use of avoidance strategies and who are focused on emotional distress, tend to present more mismatch that affects mental health (8, 23).
The results of the present research, which in turn corroborate previous studies, may contribute to the understanding why people react differently during quarantine across different countries, according to sociodemographic characteristics. However, when analyzing the differences in responses to quarantine, it must be considered that the evaluation of these variables was carried out at an individual and not collective level. Therefore, although an attempt has been made to group the results and to interpret them by using general theoretical models, individual differences should be either taken into account. Nevertheless, these results may help to identify the urgency of monitoring mental health in vulnerable groups such as the youth, students and women, in order to design specific prevention and intervention programs.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to express our appreciation to the researchers and the institutions that have participated in this multicentric study for their support in the design and dissemination of the questionnaire and the data collection. This study received financial support from the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia within the call for projects "Proyectos para Implementación de Estrategias Institucionales con Aval de Instancias Rectorales 2020" (ID project 2781).
REFERENCES
1. Xiang YT, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, Ng CH. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. The Lancet. 2020; 7(3): 228-229. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8
2. Babore A, Lombardi L, Viceconti ML, Pignataro S, Marino V, Crudele M, et al. Psychological effects of the C0VID-2019 pandemic: Perceived stress and
ETHICAL APPROVAL
The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee and the Faculty of Psychology of a Colombian University. It follows the international ethical guidelines for health research involving human beings of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) and the Declaration of Helsinki since the data collection has only been done through standardized questionnaires for this study and it is not intended to produce a psychological or psychiatric diagnosis.
coping strategies among healthcare professionals. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 293:113366, 11. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113366 3. Balmford B, Annan JD, Hargreaves JC, Altoe M, Bateman IJ. Cross-Country Comparisons of Covid-19: Policy, Politics and the Price of Life. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2020; 76:525551. doi:10.1007/s10640-020-00466-5
ORRM
4. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 2020; 395(10227):912-920. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736 (20)30460-8
5. Di Fronso S, Costa S, Montesano C, Di Gruttola F, Ciofi EG, Morgilli L, et al. The effects of COVID-19 pandemic on perceived stress and psychobioso-cial states in Italian athletes. Interna-tional Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2020; doi:10.1080/1612197X.2020.1802612
6. Luo M, Guo L, Yu M, Jiang W, Wang H. The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 291:113190. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190
7. M®kel® MJ, Reggev N, Dutra N, Tamayo RM, Sil-va-Sobrinho RA, Klevjer K, et al. Perceived efficacy of COVID-19 restrictions, reactions and their impact on mental health during the early phase of the outbreak in six countries. Royal Society Open Science. 2020; 7:200644. doi:10.1098/rsos. 200644
8. Prati G. Mental health and its psychosocial predictors during national quarantine in Italy against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. 2021; 34(2):145-156. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1861253
9. Salari N, Hosseinian-Far A, Jalali R, Vaisi-Raygani A, Rasoulpoor S, Mohammadi M, et al. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Health. 2020; 16(1):57. doi:10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w
10. Veer IM, Riepenhausen A, Zerban M, Wackerhagen C, Puhlmann L, Engen H, et al. Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown. PsyArXiv. 2020. doi:10.31234/ osf.io/4z62t
11. Sim K, Huak Chan Y, Chong PN, Chua HC, Wen Soon S. Psychosocial and coping responses within the community health care setting towards a national outbreak of an infectious disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2010; 68(2):195-202. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.004
12. Main A, Zhou Q, Ma Y, Luecken LJ, Liu, X. Relations of SARS-related stressors and coping to Chinese college students' psychological adjustment during the 2003 Beijing SARS epidemic. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2011; 58(3):410-423. doi:10.1037/a0023632
13. Khalid I, Khalid TJ, Qabajah MR, Barnard AG, Qushmaq IA. Healthcare workers emotions, perceived stressors and coping strategies during a MERS-CoV outbreak. Clinical Medicine & Research.
2016; 14(1):7-14. doi:10.3121/cmr.2016.1303
14. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(5):1729. doi:10.3390/ijerph 17051729
15. Rubin GJ, Wessely S. The psychological effects of quarantining a city. British Medical Journal. 2020; 368: m313. doi:10.1136/bmj.m313
16. Báguena MJ, Villarroya E, Beleña A, Díaz A, Roldán C, Reig R. Propiedades Psicométricas de la Versión Española de la escala Revisada de Impacto del Estresor. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 2001; 27:581-604.
17. Caiuby AVS, Lacerda SS, Quintana MI, Torii TS, Andreoli SB. Adaptafäo transcultural da versäo brasileira da Escala do Impacto do Evento-Revisada (IES-R). Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2012; 28:597-603.
18. Craparo G, Faraci P, Rotondo G, Gori A. The Impact of Event Scale - Revised: psychometric properties of the Italian version in a sample of flood victims. Neuropsychiatry Diseases and Treatment. 2013; 9:1427-32. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S51793. Epub 2013 Sep 19. PMID: 24092980; PMCID: PMC3788700.
19. Remor E. Psychometric Properties of a European Spanish Version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2006; 9(1):86-93. doi:10.1017/S1138741600006004
20. Luft CDB, Sanches SDO, Mazo GZ, Andrade A. Versäo brasileira da Escala de Estresse Percebido: tradufäo e validafäo para idosos. Revista de Saúde Pública. 2007; 41(4):606-615. doi:10.1590/S0034-89102007000400015
21. Mondo C, Sechi C, Cabras C. Psychometric evaluation of three versions of the Italian Perceived Stress Scale. Current Psychology. 2019; 1-9. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-0132-8
22. Crespo M, Cruzado JA. La evaluación del afronta-miento: adaptación española del cuestionario COPE con una muestra de estudiantes universitarios. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 1997; 23:797-830.
23. Sica C, Magni C, Ghisi M, Altoe G, Sighinolfi C, Chiri LR, et al. Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced-Nuova Versione Italiana (COPE-NVI): Uno strumento per la misura degli stili di coping. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamenta-le. 2008; 14(1):27-53.
24. Rodríguez-Carvajal R, Moreno-Jiménez B, Garrosa E. Cuestionario de Regulación Emocional. Versión española. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; 2006.
ORRM
25. Balzarotti S, John OP, Gross JJ. An Italian Adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2010; 26(1):61-67. doi:10.1027/ 1015-5759/ a000009
26. Boian AC, Soares DSM, Silva J. Questionário de Regulafao Emocional adaptado para a populafao brasileira. 2009. Available from: http://spl. stanford.edu/pdfs/erq_portuguese_brazilian.pdf
27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. British Medical Journal. 1997; 314(7080):572. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
28. Makarowski R, Piotrowski A, Predoiu R, Gorner K, Predoiu A, Mitrache G, et al. Stress and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic among martial arts athletes - A cross-cultural study. Archives of Budo. 2020; 16: 161-171.
29. De Vaus J, Hornsey MJ, Kuppens P, Bastian B. Exploring the east-west divide in prevalence of affective disorder: A case for cultural differences in coping with negative emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2018; 22(3):285-304. doi:10.1177/1088868317736222
30. Wong PTP, Wong LCJ., editors. Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping. New York: Springer; 2006.
31. Chun CA, Moos RH, Cronkite RC. Culture: A Fundamental Context for the Stress and Coping Paradigm. In: Wong PTP, Wong LCJ. (eds.). Handbook of Multicultural Perspectives on Stress and Coping. International and Cultural Psychology. Boston, MA: Springer; 2006. p. 29-53 Available from: doi:10.1007/0-387-26238-5_2
32. Guan Y, Deng H, Zhou X. Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on career development: Insights from cultural psychology. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2020; 119:103438. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103438
33. Broche-Pérez Y, Fernández-Fleites Z, Jiménez-Puig E, Fernández-Castillo E, Rodríguez-Martin BC. Gender and Fear of COVID-19 in a Cuban Population Sample. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2020; 1-9. doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00343-8
34. Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: Implications and policy recommendations. General Psychiatry. 2020; 33(2):e100213. doi:10.1136/ gpsych-2020-100213
35. Rossi R, Socci V, Talevi D, Mensi S, Niolu C, Pacitti F, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2020; 11:790. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00790
36. Alon TM, Doepke M, Olmstead-Rumsey J, Tertilt M. The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2020.
doi:10.3386/w26947.
37. Dai H, Zhang SX, Looi KH, Su R, Li J. Perception of Health Conditions and Test Availability as Predictors of Adults' Mental Health during the COVID -19 Pandemic: A Survey Study of Adults in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17:5498. doi:10.3390/ijerph17155498
38. Garfin DR. Technology as a coping tool during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: Implications and recommendations. Stress and Health. 2020; 36(4):555-559. doi:10.1002/smi. 2975
39. Hossain MM, Tasnim S, Sultana A, Faizah F, Ma-zumder H, Zou L, et al. Epidemiology of mental health problems in COVID-19: A review. F1000Research. 2020; 9:636. doi:10.12688/ f1000research.24457.1
40. Martínez-Taboas A. Pandemias, COVID-19 y Salud Mental: Qué Sabemos Actualmente?. Revista Caribeña de Psicología. 2020; 4(2):143-152. doi:10. 37226/rcp.v4i2.4907
41. Sun QH, Su Y. Psychological crisis intervention for college students during novel coronavirus infection epidemic. Psychiatry Research. 2020;289: 113043. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020. 113043
42. Odriozola-González P, Planchuelo-Gómez Á, Irur-tia MJ, de Luis-García R. Psychological effects of the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown among students and workers of a Spanish university. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 290:113108. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.11310
43. Crayne MP. The traumatic impact of job loss and job search in the aftermath of COVID-19. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2020; 12(S1):S180-S182. doi:10.1037/ tra0000852
44. Eisenbarth CA. Coping with Stress: Gender Differences among College Students. College Student Journal. 2019; 53(2):151-162.
45. Pieh C, Budimir S, Probst T. The effect of age, gender, income, work, and physical activity on mental health during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown in Austria. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2020; 136:110186. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110186
46. Lazarus RS. Estrés y Emoción. Manejo e implicaciones en nuestra salud. Bilbao, España: Desclée de Brouwer; 2000.
47. Cheng C, Lau HPB, Chan MPS. Coping flexibility and psychological adjustment to stressful life changes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. 2014; 140(6):1582-1607. doi:10.1037/ a0037913
48. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989; 56:267-283. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267
ORRM
Date of receipt of the manuscript: 21/06/2021 Date of receipt of the manuscript: 24/09/2021
Erika Yohanna BEDOYA CARDONA, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3398-8188; SCOPUS Author ID: 55841539000 Ioana POPA, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9534-2083; SCOPUS Author ID: 55987923500 Anna MORANDI, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0573-9421; SCOPUS Author ID: 8438910700 Cristina MONTOMOLI, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8526-5846, SCOPUS Author ID: 6603687469
