CC BY
21
NANOSYSTEMS: PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY, MATHEMATICS, 2016, 7 (3), P. 488-491
Magnetic silica nanoparticles for the removal of Pb+2 from water
N. Shukla1'2, A. Saxena1'*, V. Gupta1, A. S. Rawat1, V. Kumar1, S. Shrivastava2, C. Rajagopal1, P.K. Rai1'*
1Centre for Fire, Explosive and Environment Safety, Timarpur, Delhi-110054, India 2Department of Chemistry, Institute of Excellence in Higher Education, Bhopal-462016, India *[email protected], * [email protected]
PACS 81.16.Be DOI 10.17586/2220-8054-2016-7-3-488-491
Zero valent iron impregnated silica nanoparticles (Fe0/n-SiO2) were synthesized using sol-gel process followed by supercritical drying, wet impregnation and hydrogen reduction. The synthesized nanoparticles were characterized by nitrogen Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (N2-BET), Scanning Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Vibrating Sample Magnetometer and X-ray diffraction techniques. Prepared samples were found to be magnetic with ultra-low density (0.048 g/mL) and high surface area (422 m2/g). Prepared samples were evaluated for adsorptive removal of Pb+2 (5, 10, 25 and 50 ppm) from contaminated water. Results indicated that the adsorption of Pb+2 was faster at lower concentrations (5 and 10 ppm) as > 80 % of Pb+2 was removed within 480 minutes. At higher concentrations, the adsorption was slower, and the removal efficiency of 51.24 and 21.78 % were observed for 25 and 50 ppm Pb+2 respectively, whereas for bare SiO2 nanoparticles, it was 39.64 and 14.04 %.
Keywords: Fe0/n-SiO2, Pb+2, removal capacity, removal percentage, pH enhancement.
Received: 23 January 2016 Revised: 22 April 2016
1. Introduction
Lead (Pb+2) is one of the most common and hazardous inorganic water pollutants. A huge amount of Pb+2 is introduced daily in water streams in the form of wastewater from industries such as battery and paint manufacturers. Lead-containing pipes used in water supply systems are also responsible for the water contamination [1]. It has been proved that Pb+2 is non-biodegradable and produces poisonous effects on living beings. In the human body, it can accumulate in kidneys, bones, muscles and may cause of anaemia, irritability, dizziness, renal weakness and cancer [2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has set permissible limit for Pb+2 as 0.010 mg/L in potable water. To reduce the threats of Pb+2 poisoning, many water treatment techniques have been developed for the removal of Pb+2 from water. Common treatment methods for Pb+2 removal from water are chemical precipitation, ion exchange, electro-flotation, membrane filtration and reverse osmosis [3]. All of these methods have some commercial and operational limitations, therefore, it is essential to develop new technologies having low cost and high Pb+2 removal efficiencies. There has been intense interest in the utilization of nanoparticles for the purification of Pb+2-contaminated water. Due to their small size and high specific surface area, nanoparticles possess a wide range of reactive sites to adsorb environmental contaminants [4]. Various nanoparticles have been previously reported for the removal of Pb+2 from water. Nano zero valent iron (Fe0) has been found as one of the most successful nano-adsorbent for the removal of Pb+2 from contaminated water [5]. Although Fe0 has been proved to be an efficient adsorbent of Pb+2, it also has some drawbacks. It is highly unstable and is readily oxidized with atmospheric oxygen and water. Furthermore, Fe0 nanoparticles also aggregate with time and due to these drawbacks the available binding sites and reactivity of these nanoparticles become reduced. To overcome or minimize these drawbacks, Fe0 nanoparticles have been loaded or impregnated on solid supports. Various composites of Fe0 nanoparticles supported/ impregnated clays, zeolites, etc. have been previously reported for the removal of Pb+2 from contaminated water [6]. Silica based solid supports (zeolites, MCM-41 and SBA-15) have been found most suitable matrices among all supporting materials for the impregnation of Fe0 nanoparticles [7]. Previous attempts to disperse Fe0 nanoparticles over silica were limited to SBA-15 and MCM-41. In the present work, we report the synthesis of high surface area and low density Fe0 impregnated silica nanoparticles (Fe0/n-SiO2) and their application for the removal of Pb+2 from contaminated water.
2. Preparation and characterization of Fe0/n-SiO2
The synthesis of Fe0/n-SiO2 was carried out by a two-step procedure, in the first step, SiO2 nanoparticles (n-SiO2) were synthesized by the sol-gel procedure followed by supercritical drying of liquid gel to aerogel at 265 °C [8]. In the second step, the synthesized SiO2 particles were impregnated with solution of FeCl3 in methanol containing 8.0 % w/w of Fe. The material was dried and subjected to reduction under H2 gas at 600 °C for 3 - 4 h. This resulted in magnetic silica nanoparticles having 7.2 % Fe0 (determined by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotomer).
Detailed characterization of n-SiO2 has been reported in our previous communications [8,9], herein the characterization of impregnated system, i.e., Fe0/n-SiO2 has been discussed. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm of Fe0/n-SiO2 showed type IV pattern, which indicated that all particles have mesoporous characteristics. The appearance of H3 hysteresis loop also signified the presence of slit shaped pores in nanoparticles and wide pore size distributions [10]. Fe0/n-SiO2 showed BET surface area as 422 m2/g. The BJH pore size distribution curve of Fe0/n-SiO2 indicated pore maxima for micropores and mesopores at 18 and 200 A respectively. Fe0/n-SiO2 was found to possess low density (0.048 g/mL) and low moisture content (0.56 %). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of Fe0/n-SiO2 (Fig. 1) was matched from reported literature. It displayed the characteristic peak at 44.83 °, which indicated the presence of iron predominantly in the zero valency state, diffraction peaks at 44.83 ° (110), 64.99 ° (200) and 82.45 ° (211) confirmed that the Fe0 is in bcc (body-centered cubic) phase (JCPDS 00-006-0696). Moreover broad hump at 21.56 ° indicated the presence of amorphous hydrated silica [11].
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image of Fe0/n-SiO2 (Fig. 2) displayed its dendritic texture in which all nanoparticles aggregated and depicted huge porosity. Scanning Electron Microscope with Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscope (SEM-EDX) data of Fe0/n-SiO2 indicated around 7.2 % loading of Fe0 with uniform distribution on the silica nanoparticles (Fig. 3). Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) image of Fe0/n-SiO2 indicated the spherical shape of prepared nanoparticles (Fig. 2-inset). The particle diameter Fe0/n-SiO2 was observed in between 7 to 32 nm (maximum particles were of 17 nm). The magnetic properties of Fe0/n-SiO2 were examined using Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM) analysis. The appearance of hysteresis loop indicated the value of saturation magnetization (Ms) ~ 4.409 emu/g with a high coercivity (Hc) of 121.7 Oe. The sample showed higher coercivity and lower saturation magnetization in comparison to bulk iron (Hc=0.9 Oe, Ms=220 emu/g), which is indicative of iron particles in nanometer size range [12], furthermore, these impregnated nanoparticles also showed magnetic attraction. Characterization data of Fe0/n-SiO2 supported the formation of low density magnetic zero-valent iron loaded SiO2 nanoparticles. Characterization data also suggested that the surface area, bulk density and moisture content of bare n-SiO2 were decreased, whereas particle size of n-SiO2 increased after impregnation with Fe0 (Table 1).
TABLE 1. Characteristics of bare n-SiO2 and Fe0 impregnated n-SiO2
Adsorbent Bulk density (g/ml) Moisture content (%) Surface area (m2/g) Particle size range (nm) Particle shape
n-SiO2 0.035 0.80 628 3-25 Spherical
Fe0/n-SiO2 0.048 0.56 422 7-32 Spherical
3. Absorptive removal of Pb+2 using prepared nanoparticles
Prepared nanoparticles of n-SiO2 and Fe0/n-SiO2 were examined to remove Pb+2 from water. The experiments were carried out at four different Pb+2 concentrations, viz, 5, 10, 25 and 50 ppm. Adsorptive removal studies were performed at a dose level of 1 mg/mL (nanomaterial/ Pb+2 solution). 100 mg of Fe0/n-SiO2 was taken separately in 100 mL Pb+2 solutions of different concentrations. All samples were shaken continuously in rotatory shaker at the speed of 200 rpm. After shaking for fixed time periods, 2 mL sample was taken out, centrifuged and separated. Additionally, the Pb+2 concentrations were determined using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. Results indicated > 80 % removal of Pb+2 by both the adsorbents within 360 min for 5 ppm Pb+2. As the concentration of Pb+2 varied from 5 to 50 ppm the adsorption potential of n-SiO2 and Fe0/n-SiO2 decreased from 100 to 14.04 % and 100 to 21.78 % respectively within 2880 min (Fig. 4 and 5).
The change in pH during the kinetics experiments was also measured because of its importance in controlling the removal of Pb+2.
490
N. Shukla, A. Saxena, et al.
Fig. 1. XRD pattern of Fe0/n-SiO2
Fig. 2. SEM & TEM (inset) images
Fig. 3. SEM-EDX of Fe0/n-SiO2
Fig. 4. Removal of Pb+2 by n-SiO2
Fig. 5. Removal of Pb+2 by Fe0/n-SiO2
Fig. 6. Change in pH by the both adsorbents during Pb+2 removal
Considerable change in pH for n-SiO2 and Fe0/n-SiO2 was observed during the Pb+2 removal studies (Fig. 6). The maximum hike in pH for n-SiO2 and Fe0/n-SiO2 was measured as 7.29 and 7.72 respectively (initial pH was 5.4). The increase in pH of medium by zero valent iron impregnated nano adsorbents was due to the formation of iron oxide/hydroxides on oxidation in aqueous medium. The removal kinetics also affected at higher pH as Pb+2 got precipitated to Pb0, PbO, Pb(OH)2, etc. [9] at this pH. Here, it was also noticeable that the removal of Pb+2 increased with gradual increase of the medium's pH, which may be due to the protonation/deprotonation of the hydroxyl species on the surface of the nanoparticles. Overall studies indicated Fe0/n-SiO2 system as a promising material for the removal of Pb+2 from contaminated water.
4. Conclusion
Magnetic nanoparticles of Fe0/n-SiO2 with high surface area and low density were prepared using the sol-gel method followed by wet impregnation technique and hydrogen reduction. The synthesized nano-composite and bare SiO2 nanoparticles were evaluated for adsorptive removal of Pb+2 from contaminated water. Although the surface area of n-SiO2 was higher than Fe0/n-SiO2, yet it showed lower Pb+2 removal percentage. The pH enhancement (up to 7.72) by both adsorbents was also recorded during the removal studies. The results suggested that the removal of Pb+2 by both the adsorbents may be due to high surface area and also by the protonation/deprotonation of the hydroxyl species created on the surface of nanoparticles after reaction with water. Further work is going on to establish the specific mechanism for Pb+2 removal.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Dr. Chitra Rajagopal, OS & Director CFEES, Delhi for providing lab facilities to carry out and publish this work.
References
[1] Chen J.Z., Tao X.C., Xu J., Zhang T., Liu Z.L. Biosortption of lead, cadmium and mercury by immobilized microcystisaeruginosa in a column. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(12), P. 3675-3679.
[2] Naeem A., Saddique M.T., Mustafa S., Kim Y., Dilara, B. Cation exchange removal of Pb from aqueous solution by sorption onto NiO. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 168(1), P. 364-368.
[3] Brooks R., Bahadory M., Tovia F., Rostami H. Removal of lead from contaminated water. International Journal of Soil, Sediment and Water, 2010, 3(2), Article 14, P. 1-13,.
[4] Ali I. New generation adsorbents for water treatment. Chemical Reviews, 2012, 112, P. 5073-5091.
[5] Li X.Q., Elliott D.W., Zhang W.X. Zero-valent iron nanoparticles for abatement of environmental pollutants. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Material Science, 2006, 31, P. 111-122.
[6] Crane R., Scott T.B. Nanoscale zero valent iron:future prostectus for an emerging water treatment technology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 211-212, P. 112-125.
[7] Petala E., Dimos K., Douvalis A., Bakas T., Tucek J., Zboril R., Karakassides M.A. Nanoscale zero-valent iron supported on mesoporous silica: Characterization and reactivity for Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 26, P. 295-306.
[8] Saxena A., Srivastava A.K., Singh B., Kinetics of adsorption of 2-CEES and HD on impregnated silica nanoparticles under static conditions. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 2009, 55(5), P. 1236-1245.
[9] Shukla N., Saxena A., Gupta V., Rawat A.S., Kumar V., Rai P.K., Shrivastava S. Removal of lead from water by using low density metal oxide nanoparticles. Advance Science Engineering and Medicine, 2015, 7(5), P. 298-405.
[10] Chang S.S., Clair B., Ruelle J., Beauche J., Renzo F.D., Quignard F., Zhao G.J., Yamamoto H., Gril J. Mesoporosity as a new parameter for understanding tension stress generation in trees. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2009, 60(11), P. 3023-3030.
[11] Xu Y.M., Qi J., He D.M., Wang D.M. Chen H.Y. Guan J., Zhang Q.M. Preparation of amorphous silica from oil shale residue and surface modification by silane coupling agent. Oil Shale, 2010, 27(1), P. 37-46.
[12] Pelecky D.L.L., Rieke R.D. Magnetic properties of nanostructured materials. Chemistry of Materials, 1996, 8, P. 1770-1783.
