CC BY
49ISSN 2072-5981 doi: 10.26907/mrsej
aänetic Resonance in Solids
Electronic Journal
Volume 21 Special Issue 4 Paper No 19413 1-7 pages 2019
doi: 10.26907/mrsej-19413
http: //mrsej. kpfu. ru http: //mrsej. ksu. ru
Established and published by Kazan University Endorsed by International Society of Magnetic Resonance (ISMAR) Registered by Russian Federation Committee on Press (#015140),
August 2, 1996 First Issue appeared on July 25, 1997
© Kazan Federal University (KFU)*
"Magnetic Resonance in Solids. Electronic Journal" (MRSey) is a
peer-reviewed, all electronic journal, publishing articles which meet the highest standards of scientific quality in the field of basic research of a magnetic resonance in solids and related phenomena.
Indexed and abstracted by Web of Science (ESCI, Clarivate Analytics, from 2015), Scopus (Elsevier, from 2012), RusIndexSC (eLibrary, from 2006), Google Scholar, DOAJ, ROAD, CyberLeninka (from 2006), SCImago Journal & Country Rank, etc.
Editor-in-Chief Boris Kochelaev (KFU, Kazan)
Honorary Editors
Jean Jeener (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels) Raymond Orbach (University of California, Riverside)
Executive Editor
Yurii Proshin (KFU, Kazan) mrsej@kpfu. ru
0 © I This work is licensed under a Creative
* m-we» Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Special Editor of Issue
Eduard Baibekov (KFU)
Editors
Vadim Atsarkin (Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics, Moscow) Yurij Bunkov (CNRS, Grenoble) Mikhail Eremin (KFU, Kazan) David Fushman (University of Maryland, College Park) Hugo Keller (University of Zürich,
Zürich)
Yoshio Kitaoka (Osaka University,
Osaka)
Boris Malkin (KFU, Kazan) Alexander Shengelaya (Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi) Jörg Sichelschmidt (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Dresden) Haruhiko Suzuki (Kanazawa University, Kanazava) Murat Tagirov (KFU, Kazan) Dmitrii Tayurskii (KFU, Kazan) Valentine Zhikharev (KNRTU,
Kazan)
Technical Editors of Issue
Nurbulat Abishev (KFU) Maxim Avdeev (KFU) Eduard Baibekov (KFu) Alexander Kutuzov (KFU)
* In Kazan University the Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) was discovered by Zavoisky E.K. in 1944.
Short cite this: Magn. Reson. Solids 21, 19413 (2019) doi: 10.26907/mrsej-19413
Low-temperature luminescence spectrum of forbidden 4f 135d-4f14 transitions in CaF2:Lu3+ crystal
O.V. Solovyev1'*, V.N. Makhov2, H. Stryhanyuk3, M.Kirm4
1Kazan Federal University, Kremlevskaya 18, Kazan 420008, Russia 2P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Leninskiy Prospekt 53, Moscow 119991, Russia 3Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Isotope Biogeochemistry, 04318 Leipzig, Germany 4Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwald Str. 1, Tartu 50411, Estonia
*E-mail: [email protected]
(Received May 27, 2019; accepted May 28, 2019; published June 6, 2019)
The Lu3+ 4f 135d—4f14 VUV luminescence in CaF2:Lu3+ crystal at 8K was studied with a high spectral resolution using synchrotron radiation excitation. Absence of a zero-phonon line in the recorded spectrum was explained and features in the recorded spectrum were reproduced by simulation based on the microscopic model of electron-phonon interaction and the developed theory of non-Condon spectra.
PACS: 78.40.Ha, 78.20.Bh.
Keywords: 5d-4f luminescence, electron-phonon interaction, non-Condon effect, lanthanides, CaF2:Lu3+.
Dedicated to the 80th birthday of Prof. Boris Zalmanovich Malkin
1. Introduction
During the past two decades there has been a considerable interest in vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) spectra of rare earth (RE) compounds, on the basis of which new efficient VUV lasers, phosphors and scintillator materials can be designed. Absorption (excitation) and emission spectra of 4fn-4fn-15d transitions have been recorded for different RE ions in various host crystals and theoretical modeling of energy level patterns and transition intensities in such spectra was carried out for a lot of systems. However, a significant part of intensity of the 4fn-4fn-15d transitions falls in broad vibronic bands with widths up to a thousand of wavenumbers even at liquid helium temperature complicating analysis of the spectra. In literature until 2007 4fn—4fn-15d vibronic bands were commonly approximated simply with Gaussian functions with a set of adjustable parameters: offset, bandwidth, intensity ratio of zero-phonon line (ZPL) to vibronic band, etc. [1].
In the mid-2000s Prof. B.Z. Malkin proposed a method that allowed to simulate uniformly the energy level structure and the sophisticated lineshape of electron-vibrational 4fn—4fn-15d bands, being based on a microscopic model of electron-phonon interaction and implementing the real phonon spectrum of the host crystal lattice. Ref. [2] was the first paper written that presented this method and approbated it for several light RE ions in LiYF4 crystal. One of the authors of the present paper O.V.S., being B.Z. Malkin's graduate student at that time, was much inspired by the potential of this method, on the one hand - and, on the other hand, he was fascinated by the experimental results revealed on VUV luminescence spectra of the Lu3+ ion in LiYF4 crystal by other authors of the present paper. Namely, no ZPLs were found in those spectra, indicating that the corresponding electric dipole 4f 135d—4f14 transitions are forbidden. A natural idea arose - to extend the B.Z. Malkin's method of modeling of electron-vibrational 4fn—4fn-15d bands to forbidden transitions, for which Condon approximation is inapplicable. So, a fruitful combination of high quality experimental data on LiYF4:Lu3+ spectra and its inter-
Low-temperature luminescence spectrum of forbidden 4f 135d-4f14 transitions in CaF2:Lu3+ crystal
pretation using the novel theoretical approach was published in the article [3] , which was issued on paper even before the original article [2] due to faster reviewing procedure in Physical Review B. Several more publications came out in which the method was successfully applied to different compounds; at some point Prof. Malkin wrote himself on his personal page on the University website in the section 'The most important recent result': "A method of modeling of intercon-figurational electron-vibrational 4fn-4fn-l5d spectra of rare earth ions in dielectric crystals".
Celebrating the collaboration arisen in the 2000s, in the present study we investigate yet another low-temperature 4f l35d-4f14 luminescence spectrum, which also corresponds to forbidden electric dipole transitions in the Lu3+ ion - this time in CaF2 crystal. The high resolution spectrum recorded in the VUV spectral region at the famous SUPERLUMI station using synchrotron radiation excitation is compared with the results of simulation, based on the B.Z. Malkin's microscopic model of electron-phonon interaction and the expressions for non-Condon luminescence, that we derived and reported in [3,4].
2. Experiment and simulation details
High-resolution emission spectrum was studied at the SUPERLUMI station of HASYLAB at DESY, the only facility in the world enabling such research under synchrotron radiation excitation generated by the DORIS storage ring [5-7]. Single crystal of CaF2 doubly doped with 0.04 mol % Lu3+ and 0.02 mol % Ce3+ was grown by the vertical Bridgman method in a fluorine atmosphere. VUV emission spectrum was recorded using an open position-sensitive microchannel-plate detector coated with Csl in combination with a 1-m NIM VUV monochro-mator, achieving spectral resolution better than 0.5 A in the second order. More experimental details can be found in [8].
Impurity Lu3+ ions substitute for Ca2+ ions in CaF2 crystal. No local deformations of CaF2 lattice were introduced, we considered the Oh point symmetry for Lu3+ sites (non-local charge compensation). In the nearest surrounding of the Ca2+ site, there are eight fluorine ions which form a cube with the distance 2.3642 A from the Ca2+ ion. Lattice vibrations were considered in the harmonic approximation. Vibration spectrum of the CaF2 crystal lattice was studied in [9]. The maximum phonon frequency of this crystal equals 477 cm-1. Results of optical absorption and neutron inelastic scattering experiments were described successfully in the framework of the shell model [10]. Using parameters of this model, we computed frequencies and polarization vectors of vibrations for 216000 wave vectors distributed over the Brillouin zone. The electron-phonon interaction, linear in dynamic displacements of the lattice ions, was considered within the cluster approximation: modulation of the crystal field by ligand' shells vibrations was considered only. Imaginary parts of the lattice advanced Green's functions for the displacements of shells in the cluster Ca2+F- were calculated at the equally spaced 954 points on the frequency axis by numerical integration over the Brillouin zone.
To simulate spectral envelopes for the CaF2:Lu3+ crystal luminescence, we used the microscopic model of electron-phonon interaction derived by Prof. B.Z. Malkin in [2]. The simulations involved: calculation of crystal field parameter B0}(5d) (there is only independent parameter for the Oh point symmetry; here and further we use crystallographic axes) for the 5d electron as an explicit function of lattice ion's coordinates in the framework of the exchange charge model, B.Z. Malkin's famous development in crystal field theory [11] (lattice contribution to the Coulomb part of B4(5d) was estimated using the Ewald method); numerical diagonalization of the effective impurity ion Hamiltonian containing energies of electrostatic Coulomb and exchange interactions between electrons, spin-orbit interactions and the crystal field interactions for the
ground (4f14) and excited (4f 135d) electronic configurations (configuration interactions were neglected); calculations of the 5d electron-phonon coupling constants as derivatives of crystal field parameters with respect to coordinates of crystal lattice ions; electron-phonon interaction was neglected for the 4f electrons as it is much smaller than for the 5d electron due to much more contracted space distribution of 4f wavefunctions. The calculated spectral lineshape was convoluted with the Gaussian with the full width at half maximum 19 cm-1 to take into account the inhomogeneous broadening induced by random lattice strains.
Radial moments of the 5d electron density, overlap integrals between the 5d electron and the ligands' outer electronic shells, bipolar expansion coefficients, which account for extended charge distributions of these electrons, were calculated using the 2s, 2p functions of the F- ion from [12] and the 5d function of the Lu3+ ion, which was obtained by modifying the Yb2+ function [13] to conform the moments of 5d electron density, calculated in [14] for Lu3+ with the use of standard program packages of atomic physics. Note, that the calculated bipolar expansion coefficients are negative, thus indicating the strong overlap between charge distributions of a 5d electron and ligands' outer electrons is to be considered strictly [15].
We derived analytical expressions for the shape of low-temperature non-Condon absorption and luminescence spectra of impurity centers in dielectric crystals in [4]. A solution of the Schrodinger equation for an electronic subsystem within the adiabatic approximation was considered in the first order of perturbation theory for the electron-vibrational interaction linear in normal coordinates of the vibrational subsystem (the Kubo-Toyodzawa approach [16]). It was proved that if an optical transition is forbidden in Condon approximation due to symmetry selection rules, the low-temperature non-Condon absorption and luminescence spectra are mirror symmetric and do not contain a zero-phonon line. The derived shape of the non-Condon spectrum of a symmetry forbidden electric dipole transition is determined by a lattice advanced Green's function diagonal over perturbation of the electric dipole moment matrix element due to electron-vibrational interaction: transition becomes allowed through borrowing the intensity from allowed transitions via electron-vibrational interaction. Conditions under which a symmetry forbidden electronic transition becomes allowed within the established approximations due to interaction with vibrations have been determined in [4].
3. Results and discussion
The ground configuration 4f14 of the Lu3+ ion is a nondegenerate state with a wavefunction transforming according to the identical irreducible representation r1g of the Oh point symmetry group. The Lu3+ ion excited 4f 135d configuration consists of 140 states and splits in the Oh symmetry crystal field into 58 levels: 6 singlets Г1и, 5 singlets Г2и, 12 doublets Г3и, 18 triplets Г4и and 17 triplets Г5и. Since vector components transform according to the irreducible representation Г4и, electric dipole 4f 135d-4f14 transitions are allowed only for the 18 4f 135d triplets of the Г4и type. Transitions for all other 4f135d levels are symmetry forbidden in Condon approximation. If we go beyond this approximation, they can become allowed due to admixture of Г4и levels by electron-vibrational interaction; the shape of corresponding low-temperature non-Condon spectra can be calculated using formulas derived in [4]. It is quite symbolic that symmetrized displacements of a cubic cluster were revealed also by B.Z. Malkin in [17]: there are 5 types of even displacements, which correspond to irreducible representations r1g (totally symmetric), r3g, r4g (corresponds to rotations of the cluster and therefore can be neglected), r5g (two sets of displacements). Only interaction with totally symmetric vibrations contributes in adiabatic approximation to the Condon form of an optical band. Now let us consider a non-Condon spec-
Low-temperature luminescence spectrum of forbidden 4f 135d-4f14 transitions in CaF2:Lu3+ crystal
trum corresponding to a symmetry forbidden electric dipole 4f l35d(r3u)—4f14 transition. Since [r3u x r3u]symm = rlg +r3g and r3u x r4u = r4g + r5g, such a transition becomes allowed within adiabatic approximation due to interaction with vibrations of r5g symmetry. As for a symmetry forbidden electric dipole 4f l35d(r5«)-4f14 transition, since [^ x ^]symm = r^ + ^ + ^ and r5u x r4u = r2g +r3g + r4g +r5g, such a transition remains forbidden within the established approximations even with electron-phonon interaction taken into account.
The Lu3+ ion 4f l35d energy levels are determined by the following impurity ion Hamil-tonian parameters: crystal field parameter B)(5d) (which is in turn determined within the exchange charge model by three adjustable parameters Gs, Ga, Gn), crystal field parameters B)(4f), B0j(4f), spin-orbit interaction constants Z(4f), Z(5d), parameters of electrostatic interaction F(2)(fd), F(4)(fd), G(l)(fd), G(3)(fd), G(5)(fd), energy shift of the excited 4fl35d configuration. One of the principles of the present study was to vary as few Hamiltonian parameters as possible. Spin-orbit interaction constants were taken from data on gaseous Lu3+ [18]: Z(4f) = 3406 cm^, Z(5d) = 1939 cm-1. Exchange charge model parameters Gs = 2.3, Ga = 2.282, Gn = 0.1 were taken from our unpublished investigation of CaF2:Ce3+ spectra; these values are also very close to the values that we established in our investigation of Tm2+ spectra in CaF2 crystal [19]. Corresponding calculated 5d crystal field parameter equals B)(5d) = —31492 cm_l; this is nearly 1.5 times smaller than the B)}(5d) value for the Ce3+ ion in CaF2 that was used in [1]. Similarly, we fixed the 4f crystal field parameters at the level of 2/3 of the values that were used in [1] for CaF2:Ce3+: B4(4f) = — 1267cm-\ Bg(4f) = 333cm-^ Also, 4 out of 5 parameters of electrostatic interaction were taken from our investigation of LiYF4:Lu3+ spectra [3,15]: F(2)(fd) = 19727cm-\ F(4)(fd) = 10477cm-\ G(3)(fd) = 5640cm-\ G(5)(fd) = 7807cm-l. The only actually fitted parameter (not taking into account the excited configuration energy shift) was the G(l)(fd) parameter of electrostatic interaction; we obtained the following value G(l)(fd) = 3210cm-1.
Calculations show that two lowest 4f l35d levels are a doublet r3u and a triplet r5u with very close energies, while the third excited level - a triplet r4u - is situated more than 2000 cm_l higher. Such an energy level structure is typical for this symmetry, the same one was obtained in [20] for Yb2+ in SrCl2. Note that electric dipole transitions from the two lowest 4f l35d levels to the ground configuration 4fl4 are forbidden by symmetry. Therefore, to simulate the low-temperature luminescence spectrum for the CaF2:Lu3+ crystal it is necessary to use the formulas for non-Condon lineshape derived in [4]. It follows from the analysis above that this spectrum becomes allowed for the doublet r3u due to interaction with vibrations of r5g symmetry; no ZPL should be observed in this spectrum. On the contrary, electric dipole transition to the ground configuration 4fl4 is allowed for the third 4f l35d level, so a ZPL should be observed in corresponding spectrum having a Condon shape.
These theoretical results agree with experiment very well. The CaF2:Lu3+ emission spectrum measured with high resolution reveals no ZPL indeed. In Fig. 1 this spectrum measured at 8 K is compared with the simulated non-Condon luminescence spectrum corresponding to transitions from the 4f l35d(r3u) level. The calculated energy of zero-phonon 4f l35d(r3u)—4fl4 transition is marked for convenience: 80310 cm_l. It is interesting to note that the energy positions of three maxima in the recorded spectrum are reproduced by simulation (but not their relative intensities): 170cm-l, 250 cm^ and 330 cm^ with respect to the energy of zero-phonon transition. One more maximum in the measured spectrum is found at the energy of 780 cm^ with respect to the energy of zero-phonon transition. It is not reproduced by calculations - actually the calculated spectral distribution vanishes at such high energies much exceeding the maxi-
Energy (cm1)
Figure 1. 4f 135d-4f14 luminescence spectra recorded at 8 K (solid line) and simulated for 0 K (dashed line) of Lu3+ ion in the CaF2 :Lu3+ crystal. Arrow marks the calculated zero-phonon transition energy.
mum phonon energy of the CaF2 crystal, perhaps indicating that a quadratic non-Condon effect should be considered in this case [21]. Whether it is possible to improve agreement between calculations and experimental data by fitting the model parameters, which were not varied in the present study for methodical reasons, remains an open question. However, it is obvious, that shape of a non-Condon spectrum is much more sensitive to variation of Hamiltonian parameters than the Condon shape, especially in the case when Condon contribution to a spectrum vanishes due to symmetry.
It is interesting to note that in [8] CaF2:Lu3+ emission spectra were recorded, with a somewhat lower spectral resolution, for a set of temperatures ranging from 8K to 200 K, and an additional band was observed with a maximum at about 80620 cm-1 for temperatures 140 K and above. However, our calculations show that there are no any additional energy levels close to this energy. We think that the band observed in [8] is simply the anti-Stokes component of the non-Condon luminescence spectrum considered above; the energy « 80620 cm-1 of the observed additional maximum seems to be in agreement with the energy of the most intensive maximum revealed in the measured low-temperature luminescence spectrum (79980 cm-1, see Fig. 1) mirrored with respect to the zero-phonon transition energy 80310 cm-1. We are planning to publish a theoretical approach that would allow calculating the non-Condon shape of optical spectra at finite temperatures in the nearest future.
In [8] excitation spectrum of the CaF2:Lu3+ crystal has also been investigated at 8K. In agreement with the calculation results discussed above, a ZPL is indeed observed in this spectrum, which corresponds to the allowed transitions from the ground configuration 4f14 to the third 4f135d level (r4u symmetry). The energy of the observed ZPL gives us the energy of zero-phonon transition for this 4f135d(r4u) level: 82420 cm-1. Value of the only parameter varied in the present study - G(1)(fd) - was chosen in order to fit this energy, once the position of zero-phonon transition in Fig. 1 was fixed.
For clarity, we collected in Table 1 some specific spectral characteristics of the three lowest 4f135d levels of Lu3+ ion in CaF2: the level number in the order of energy increase (N), Oh point
Low-temperature luminescence spectrum of forbidden 4f 135d-4f14 transitions in CaF2:Lu3+ crystal Table 1. Spectral characteristics of the lowest 4f 135d levels in CaF2:Lu3+(energies given in cm-1).
N Ir. rep. ecf ezpl Ezpl (exper.)
1 r3u 80389 80310 Not observed (symmetry forbidden transitions)
2 r5u 80389.4 80311
3 r4u 82505 82420 82420
symmetry group irreducible representation (Ir. rep.), the calculated eigenvalue of the effective impurity ion Hamiltonian, often called 'crystal field energy' (Ecf), the calculated zero-phonon line (or zero-phonon transition, to be more precise) energy (Ezpl), the zero-phonon line energy derived from the experimental data (EZPL (exper.)).
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge fruitful collaboration with Prof. Dr. B.Z.Malkin and inspiring influence of his scientific ideas. The authors would like to thank S.Kh. Batygov for providing us with the crystal for measurements. We are very grateful to Prof. Dr. G.Zimmerer for his contribution to the development of SUPERLUMI, his kind support and interest to research of all user groups exploiting this magnificent station, which was dedicated to luminescence investigations of materials.
References
1. Van Pieterson L., Reid M.F., Wegh R.T., Soverna S., Meijerink A. Phys. Rev. B 65, 045113 (2002)
2. Malkin B.Z., Solovyev O.V., Malishev A.Yu., Saikin S.K. J. Lumin. 125, 175 (2007)
3. Kirm M., Stryganyuk G., Vielhauer S., Zimmerer G., Makhov V.N., Malkin B.Z., Solovyev O.V., Abdulsabirov R.Yu., Korableva S.L. Phys. Rev. B 75, 075111 (2007)
4. Solovyev O.V. Phys. Solid State 52, 728 (2010)
5. Zimmerer G. Radiat. Meas. 42, 859 (2007)
6. Makhov V.N. Phys. Scripta 89, 044010 (2014)
7. Bel'skii A.N., Vasil'ev A.N., Ivanov S.N., Kamenskikh I.A., Kolobanov V.N., Makhov V.N., Spasskii D.A. Crystallogr. Rep. 61, 886 (2016)
8. Makhov V.N., Batygov S.Kh., Dmitruk L.N., Kirm M., Vielhauer S., Stryganyuk G. Phys. Solid State 50, 1625 (2008)
9. Elcombe M.M., Pryor A.W. J. Phys. C 3, 492 (1970)
10. Ignatiev I.V. Fizika Tverdogo Tela 32, 2698 (1990) (in Russian)
11. Malkin B.Z., in Spectroscopy of Solids Containing Rare-Earth Ions, edited by A.A. Kaplyan-skii and R.M. Macfarlane, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1987), p. 13
12. Clementi E., Mclean A.D. Phys. Rev. A 133, 419 (1964)
13. Starostin N.V., in Spectroscopy of Crystals, Nauka, Moskva (1975), p. 256 (in Russian)
14. Reid M.F., van Pieterson L., Meijerink A. J. Alloys Compd. 344, 240 (2002)
15. Solovyev O.V., Malkin B.Z. J. Mol. Struct. 838, 176 (2007)
16. Kubo R., Toyodzawa Y. Prog. Theor. Phys. 13, 160 (1955)
17. Malkin B.Z., in Paramagnetic Resonance, Kazan University, Kazan (1968), Vol.4, p.3 (in Russian)
18. Sugar J., Kaufman V.J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 562 (1972)
19. Solovyev O.V. Magn. Reson. Solids 11, 14 (2009)
20. Pan Z., Duan C.-K., Tanner P.A. Phys. Rev. B 77, 085114 (2008)
21. Solovyev O.V., Yunusov R.Yu. Opt. Spectrosc. 116, 754 (2014)
