CC BY
25SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS VOLUME 4 I ISSUE 1 I 2023 _ISSN: 2181-1601
Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF 2022=5.016) Passport: http://sjifactor.com/passport.php?id=22257
LINGUOPRAGMATIC FEATURES OF TRANSLATION OF BUSINESS
CORRESPONDENCE...
Nargiza Abbasova Shahnoza Murodova
Phd, Fergana State University Master's degree student
ABSTRACT
Relevance of the research is associated with the rapid growth of international contacts in the individual and public levels as in a professional environment business communication, negotiations, lawsuits and cases involving foreign individuals or legal entities, and in the domestic sphere tourism, emigration, and so on. Respectively, the issue of legal translation constantly requires more and more in-depth study and systematization due to its complexity.
Key terms: pragmatics, pragmalinguistics, business documents, translation of official business documents, formal speech, business correspondence.
The style of official correspondence and documents (the range of use of this style is very wide is wide, and in the literature on stylistics it is called by different names, in particular, official style of work, style of official documents) economic, legal and diplomatic communication in relationships, government agencies, courts, trade interactions used to make Accordingly, in this style, articles of legal law, diplomatic appeals - notes, decisions of government agencies, instructions, orders, contracts, official announcements and messages, correspondence and similar work documents are written.
There are two forms of formal speech:
1. Oral form of formal speech.
2. Written form of formal speech.
In dictionaries word official means an administrative or related to administration. And here, another meanings of this item:
•Government, state or relating to an organization, determined by them. Official representative.
• Announced by the government, state bodies or an organization, issued, distributed. Official information. Official information.
•Legally approved, formalized. Official documents. Official organization.
•It is specific to the language of dealings, correspondence and documents carried out by
the state was; correspondence. Formal Style [1]
"Official work style. It is a type of functional style, which is formal (to the office characteristic) possession of lexicon and phraseology, stamps, conditional
SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS VOLUME 4 I ISSUE 1 I 2023 _ISSN: 2181-1601
Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF 2022=5.016) Passport: http://sjifactor.com/passport.php?id=22257
abbreviations, nomenclature is the use of terms, in the correct nomenative sense of words with signs such as its use, almost no means of expressive speech characterized" [2] . The style of official correspondence and documents (the range of use of this style is very wide is wide, and in the literature on stylistics it is called by different names, in particular, official style of work, style of official documents) economic, legal and diplomatic communication in relationships, government agencies, courts, trade interactions used to make Accordingly, legal articles in this style, diplomatic appeals -notes, decisions of government agencies, instructions, orders, contracts, official announcements and messages, correspondence and similar work documents are written. The purpose and function of formal speech is from formal communication: informant and receivers, which are classified in two cases:
• In the first classification, the informer is a manager, and the receiver of information is an employee is considered From official working documents to working documents included in this group order documents: includes documents such as orders, instructions, orders. Contact form expressed orally and in writing.
• In the second classification, the employee gives information, the leader receives information to be reliable, such official working documents as information - to the group of informational documents incoming: application report, receipt, existing letter, reference and similar work a set of documents. In this case, the form of communication is mainly written
Accuracy, logic, brevity typical of scientific style in formal speech there are extralinguistic markers such as completeness.
When talking about the linguistic features of official speech,both in form, that is, as oral and written (working documents), some linguistic is free of units. For example, diminutive affixes, dialectal words, argot and slang words, disease, metaphor, diagnosis, revitalization, The service is no longer used for expression of thought such as exaggeration.[3]. Conciseness, completeness and accuracy of the text of the official speech is also his it depends on how to use linguistic units correctly.
There are strict words in the official speech, in which the document after the text or after, within the text. for example Entrants of the order material type: in the order, the order part is from the string, begins with the word "BUYURAMAN" with all letters written in capital letters in uzbek language. "ACCEPT", "ASSIGN", "TRANSFER" in the command section all letters of verbs such as "LET'S BE MARKED", "LET'S BE RELEASED" are capital letters is written with capital letters in English. The main feature of formal speech is accuracy and conciseness, in which it is ready syntactic devices are widely used, clear and clear expression of speech provides. Also, there are a lot of figurative sentences, especially compound sentences is used. It is new in linguistics, like all other fields during the past centuries theories, new directions were
SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS VOLUME 4 I ISSUE 1 I 2023 _ISSN: 2181-1601
Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF 2022=5.016) Passport: http://sjifactor.com/passport.php?id=222ff7
brought to the field and their essence great work has been done to reveal it, and even now such scientific research is ongoing. In particular, from the last quarter of the 20th century starting with the study of language units based on the principles of anthropocentric research became the leading tasks of linguistics. Also official in Uzbek language Pragmalinguistic research of speech texts of our linguistics are considered urgent problems. First, what is pragmatics, its appearance about the history of being, by whom it was brought to science, and its study we want to touch on different views. "Pragmatics (Greek pragma, pragmatos - work, action, practical) - language a special branch of linguistics that studies the function of symbols in speech direction"[4]. The source of pragmatics is CH. Peirce, W. James, D. Dune, CH. Morris is associated with the name of famous philosopher scientists. Because in their work (XIX the end of the century and the beginning of the 20th century) sign system and linguistic sign ideas about functionality are thrown into the middle, and the main ones about semiotics concepts are defined, the interaction between syntax, semantics and pragmatics differences are shown[5]. Pragmatics is based on the ideas of the above scientists was formed, as a scientific term by the American scientist CH.Morris was introduced: "The term pragmatics was introduced by CH.I.Morris in the 30s of the 20th century brought into scientific circulation"[6]. Later this term is several It is widely used in the scientific works of scientists, and different views have arisen. Here it is pragmatic in linguistics in the 60s and 70s of the 20th century through these theories direction began to emerge. "The formation of linguistic pragmatics is a great scientist It is connected with the philosophical views of L.Wittgenstein, precisely in his works showing pragmatics as an independent field of theoretical semiotic research will be passed[7]. Linguistic pragmatics in later European and Russian linguistics scientific information about it began to be widely distributed and scientific research was carried out Initially, CH. Morris divided semiotics into three directions: semantics, syntactics and divided into directions such as pragmatics[8], later a German scientist Georg Klaus, unlike other linguists, from a semiotic point of view shows the four directions of the tongue. Syntax is between character and character learns the relationship. Semantics are concepts that reflect the material world learns the meaning of the sign from his point of view. Sigmatic is between a sign and an object learns interaction. Pragmatics is the effect of a sign on a person, its studies its influence on the way of thinking, morals, and feelings[9].
References:
1. Aminov M., Madvaliev A., Mahkamov N., Mahmudov N. Business management. -Tashkent: "National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan", 2015
SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS VOLUME 4 I ISSUE 1 I 2023 _ISSN: 2181-1601
Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF 2022=5.016) Passport: http://sjifactor.com/passport.php?id=222ff7
2. Van Dyck T. Yazyk. Poznan. Communication. - BGK im. I.A. Baudouin de Courtenay, 2000.
3. Nurmonov A. The pragmatic aspect of syntactic units. Selected works. Volume III. -Tashkent, Academy, 2012.
4. Safarov Sh. Pragmalinguistics. - Tashkent, 2008.
5. Pivvuyeva, Y., Dvoinina Y. (2004). Manual on the Theory of Translation (on the Basis of the English Language). Moscow: Nauka.
6. Nurmatova, M. M., & Yusupova, S. A. Z. (2022). FLORISTIC WORLD RELATED PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS: BASIC CONCEPTS. In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES (Vol. 1, No. 21, pp. 158-161).
7. Mahammatobbosovna, S. M., A'zamjonovna, Y. S., & Mahammatobbosovna, S. U. (2022). COGNITIVE AND SEMANTIC FOUNDATIONS OF PRESUPPOSITION IN THE STORIES OF ERNEST HEMINGWAY AND ABDULLA KAHHAR. Talqin va tadqiqotlar ilmiy-uslubiy jurnali, 1(16), 40-42.
8. Yusupova, S., Teshaboyeva, Z., & Komoldinov, S. (2023). INGLIZ TILI DARSLARIDA O 'YINLARNING AHAMIYATI XUSUSIDA. Yangi O'zbekiston talabalari axborotnomasi, 1(1), 21-25.
9. Yusupova, S. А. Z., & Toshmirzayeva, D. O. (2023). INGLIZ VA OZBEK TILLARIDA BAXT VA BAXTSIZLIK KONSEPTINING IFODALANISHI. YOUTH, SCIENCE, EDUCATION: TOPICAL ISSUES, ACHIEVEMENTS AND INNOVATIONS, 2(8), 87-92.
10. A'zamjonovna, Y. S. (2023). INGLIZ TILI TALAFFUZINING HUDUDIY VARIANTLARI VA ULARNING FONETIK XUSUSIYATLARI. SUSTAINABILITY OF EDUCATION, SOCIO-ECONOMIC SCIENCE THEORY, 1(5), 60-63.
11. Yusupova, S. A. Z., & qizi Ma'murova, M. B. (2023). YAXSHILIK VA YOMONLIK HAQIDAGI O 'ZBEK XALQ MAQOLLARI. GOLDEN BRAIN, 1(1), 259-262.
12. Yusupova, S., & Nozimova, M. (2023). LEXICAL-SEMANTIC AND ONOMASTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF BIRD NAMES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK. Eurasian Journal of Academic Research, 3(1 Part 2), 125-128.
13. A'zamjonovna, Y. S., & Akmaljonovna, N. X. (2023). USE OF SPORTS TERMS IN LINGUISTICS. Новости образования: исследование вXXIвеке, 1(6), 162-164.
14. qizi Akhatova, K. Q., & Yusupova, S. A. Z. (2023). ACTUAL SPEECH DIVISION IN LINGUISTICS. THE ROLE OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION IN THE MODERN WORLD, 2(4), 39-43.
15. A'zamjonovna, Y. S. (2023). INGLIZ TILI TALAFFUZINING HUDUDIY VARIANTLARI VA ULARNING FONETIK XUSUSIYATLARI. SUSTAINABILITY OF EDUCATION, SOCIO-ECONOMIC SCIENCE THEORY, 1(5), 60-63.
SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS VOLUME 4 I ISSUE 1 I 2023 _ISSN: 2181-1601
Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF 2022=5.016) Passport: http://sjifactor.com/passport.php?id=222ff7
16. A'zamjonovna, Y. S., & Xurshidaxon, A. (2023). AFIKSLARNING SO'Z TURKUMLARIGA KO'RA GURUHLANISHI. SUSTAINABILITY OF EDUCATION, SOCIO-ECONOMIC SCIENCE THEORY, 7(5), 55-59.
17. Djumabayeva, S., & Yusupova, S. (2023). INGLIZ TILI VA UNING POLIETNIK XUSUSIYATLARI. Yangi O'zbekistonpedagoglari axborotnomasi, 1(1), 37-41.
18. A'zamjonovna, Y. S., & Murotovna, K. M. (2023). Second Language Acquisition. Miasto Przyszlosci, 31, 5-8.
19. Юсупова, С. А. (2023). НЕКОТОРЫЕ ВАЖНЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ АНГЛИЙСКИХ АНЕКДОТОВ. Journal of new century innovations, 12(4), 38-40.
20. A'zamjonovna, Y. S. (2023). KOGNITIV LINGVISTIKADA KONSEPT TUSHUNCHASI. Journal of new century innovations, 12(4), 43-48.
21. Turdaliyeva, D., Abbasova, N., & Hamidova, N. (2022). LINGUISTIC FEATURES OF MICROTEXTS. Science and Innovation, 1(7), 1235-1239.
22. Abbasova, Nargiza, N. Zaynalova, and M. Mahammatjonova. "METHODS AND TECHNIQUES FOR TEACHING ENGLISH PROVERBS AND SAYINGS IN THE EFL CLASSROOM." Science and innovation 1, no. B7 (2022): 661-667.
23. Turdaliyeva, D., Abbasova, N., & Hamidova, N. (2022). MIKROMАTNLARNING LISONIY ХШШГСА^АМ. Science and innovation, 1(B7), 754-758.
24. Аббасова, Н. К., & Канатаева, Э. (2017). ДОМИНАНТНЫЕ ОСОБЕННОСТИ АНГЛИЙСКОГО КОММУНИКАТИВНОГО ПОВЕДЕНИЯ НА ПРАКТИЧЕСКИХ ЗАНЯТИЯХ В ВУЗЕ. Ученый XXI века, 57.
25. Abbasova, N. K. (2019). The importance of techniques in developing critical abilities of the learners in teaching English proverbs and sayings. Мировая наука, (9), 3-6.
