KIDNEY DISEASE IN THE SETTING OF HIV INFECTION: CONCLUSIONS FROM A KIDNEY DISEASE: IMPROVING GLOBAL OUTCOMES (KDIGO) CONTROVERSIES CONFERENCE

Swanepoel Charles R.; Atta Mohamed G.; D'Agati Vivette D.; Estrella Michelle M.; Fogo Agnes B.; Naicker Saraladevi; Post Frank A.; Wearne Nicola; Winkler Cheryl A.; Cheung Michael; Wheeler David C.; Winkelmayer Wolfgang C.; Wyatt Christina M.

Глубокоуважаемые читатели!

С целью ознакомления специалистов-нефрологов России с идеями КБЮО в их оригинальной версии и распространением экспертного мнения в отечественной медицинской среде в рамках рубрики последипломного образования по нефрологии Редакция публикует статью по итогам согласительной конференции КБЮО по ВИЧ-ассоциированной болезни почек на языке оригинала. Статья публикуется с разрешения КБЮО, за что Редакция выражает свою благодарность.

Для цитирования: Swanepoel CR, Atta MG, D'Agati VD, et al. Kidney disease in the setting of HIV infection: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2018; 93: 545-559. DOI:10.24884/1561-6274-2018-22-6-84-100 For citation: Swanepoel CR, Atta MG, D'Agati VD, et al. Kidney disease in the setting of HIV infection: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2018; 93:545-559. D0I:10.24884/1561-6274-2018-22-6-84-100

Ч.Р. Сванепоэль1, М.Дж. Атта2, В.Д. Д'Агати3, М.М. Эстрелла4, А.Б. Фого5, С. Найкер6, Ф.А. Пост7, Н. Верне1, Ч.А. Винклер8, М. Чеунг9, Д.С. Вилер10, В.С. Винкельмайер11, К.М. Вьятт12; за участников конференции13

ВИЧ-АССОЦИИРОВАННАЯ БОЛЕЗНЬ ПОЧЕК: ИТОГИ СОГЛАСИТЕЛЬНОЙ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ KDIGO

1 Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; 2Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 3Department of Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; "Department of Medicine, San Francisco VA Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco,California, USA; 5Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; 6Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 7King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 8Basic Research Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health and Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland, USA; 9KDIGO, Brussels, Belgium; "University College London, London, UK; "Selzman Institute for Kidney Health, Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; and "Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

Charles R. Swanepoel1, Mohamed G. Atta2, Vivette D. D'Agati3, Michelle M. Estrella4, Agnes B. Fogo5, Saraladevi Naicker6, Frank A. Post7, Nicola Wearne1, Cheryl A. Winkler8, Michael Cheung9, David C. Wheeler10, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer11 and Christina M. Wyatt12; for Conference Participants13

KIDNEY DISEASE IN THE SETTING OF HIV INFECTION: CONCLUSIONS FROM A KIDNEY DISEASE: IMPROVING GLOBAL OUTCOMES (KDIGO) CONTROVERSIES CONFERENCE

1Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; 2Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 3Department of Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; "Department of Medicine, San Francisco VA Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco,California, USA; 5Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; 6Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 7King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; 8Basic Research Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health and Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland, USA; 9KDIGO, Brussels, Belgium; "University College London, London, UK; "Selzman Institute for Kidney Health, Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; and "Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

Correspondence: Charles R. Swanepoel, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Email: charles.swanepoel@uct.ac.za; or Christina M. Wyatt, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Nephrology, Box 1243, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, New York 10029, USA. E-mail: christina.wyatt@mssm.edu 13 See Appendix for list of other conference participants.

Copyright a 2017, International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

Received 15 August 2017; revised 23 October 2017; accepted 8 November 2017; published online 2 February 2018

РЕФЕРАТ

ВИЧ-позитивные пациенты имеют высокий риск развития патологии почек, включая ВИЧ-ассоциированную нефропа-тию, неколлабирующий фокально-сегментарный гломерулосклероз, иммунокомплексное поражение почек, а также поражение почек, обусловленное длительным воздействием антиретровирусной терапии или оппортунистическими инфекциями. Клинические рекомендации по предупреждению заболеваний почек и лечению ВИЧ-позитивных пациентов в основном опираются на исследования, проведенные в общей популяции, и не до конца учитывают существующие знания в отношении уникальных патогенетических механизмов, ассоциированных с ВИЧ, и генетических факторов, способствующих развитию патологии почек в этой популяции. Мы провели встречу экспертов в нефрологии, почечной патологии, инфекционных болезнях с целью определения болезни почек в контексте ВИЧ-инфекции, уточнения роли генетических аномалий в истории заболевания, диагнозе и лечении ренальной патологии у ВИЧ-позитивных пациентов, оценки соотношения риск-польза антиретровирусной терапии и профилактики ВИЧ в отношении функции почек и разработки наилучшей тактики предупреждения и ведения болезни почек, ассоциированной с ВИЧ-инфекцией. Ключевые слова: антиретровирусная терапия, APOL1, прогрессирование ХБП, ВИЧ, иммунокомплексная болезнь почек, подоцитопатия, патология почек

ABSTRACT

HIV-positive individuals are at increased risk for kidney disease, including HIV-associated nephropathy, noncollapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, immune-complex kidney disease, and comorbid kidney disease, as well as kidney injury resulting from prolonged exposure to antiretroviral therapy or from opportunistic infections. Clinical guidelines for kidney disease prevention and treatment in HIV-positive individuals are largely extrapolated from studies in the general population, and do not fully incorporate existing knowledge of the unique HIV-related pathways and genetic factors that contribute to the risk of kidney disease in this population. We convened an international panel of experts in nephrology, renal pathology, and infectious diseases to define the pathology of kidney disease in the setting of HIV infection; describe the role of genetics in the natural history, diagnosis, and treatment of kidney disease in HIV-positive individuals; characterize the renal risk-benefit of antiretroviral therapy for HIV treatment and prevention; and define best practices for the prevention and management of kidney disease in HIV-positive individuals.

Keywords: antiretroviral therapy; APOL1; CKD progression; HIV; immune complex kidney disease; podocytopathy; renal pathology

Worldwide, an estimated 37 million people are living with HIV infection, and more than 2 million new infections are diagnosed annually.1 HIV-positive individuals are at increased risk for both acute and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The Classic kidney disease of HIV infection, HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN), has become less common with widespread use of antiretroviral therapy (ART); however, there has been a simultaneous increase in the prevalence of Other kidney diseases. HIV-positive individuals are also exposed to lifelong ART, with the potential to cause or exacerbate kidney injury. Newer guidelines recommending earlier initiation of ART may further reduce the incidence of HIVAN, but the overall risk benefit for kidney health is unknown.

Clinical guidelines for CKD prevention and treatment in HIV-positive individuals are extrapolated from studies in the general population,2 and current therapies do not target unique HIV-related pathways and genetic factors that contribute to CKD progression. In March 2017, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) convened a multidisci-plinary, international panel of Clinical and scientific experts to identify and discuss key issues relevant to the Optimal diagnosis and management of kidney disease in HIV-positive individuals. The primary goals were to define the pathology of kidney disease in the setting of HIV infection; describe the role of

genetics in the natural history, diagnosis, and treatment of kidney disease in HIV-positive individuals; characterize the renal risk-benefit of ART; and define best practices to delay the progression of kidney disease and to treat end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in HIV-positive individuals.

Renal pathology in the setting of HIV infection

The spectrum of renal pathology in HIV-positive individuals is diverse, including lesions directly related to intrarenal HIV gene expression and lesions related to comorbidities, drug effects, immune dys-regulation, and co-infections.3 Kidney biopsy is required to distinguish between these lesions. A useful approach to classification is based on the major tissue compartment affected (Table 1). A brief description of each histologic lesion is provided below, and more comprehensive descriptions are available in the Supplementary Appendix.

Glomerular-dominant diseases: podocytopathy. G1omerular-dominant diseases include 2 main sub-categories: podocytopathies and immune complex-mediated.

Four major subtypes of podocytopathy are seen in the setting of HIV: classic HIVAN, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) not otherwise specified (NOS), and rarer cases of minimal change disease and diffuse mesangial hypercellularity.4 All exhibit exten-

Table 1

Pathologic classification of HIV-related kidney diseases

I. Glomerular-dominanta

a. Podocytopathies (all characterized by extensive foot process effacement)b

i. Classic HIVAN

ii. FSGS (NOS) in the setting of HIV

iii. Minimal change disease in the setting of HIV

iv. Diffuse mesangial hypercellularity in the setting of HIV

v. Other podocytopathy in the setting of HIV

b. Immune complex-mediated glomerular disease8

i. IgA nephropathy in the setting of HIV

ii. Lupus-like glomerulonephritis in the setting of HIV

iii. Lupus nephritis in the setting of HIV

iv. Membranous nephropathy in the setting of HIV

* Indicate whether HBV positive, HCV positive, PLA2R positive (should not preclude workup for other secondary causes)

v. Membranoproliferative pattern glomerulonephritis in the setting of HIV

* Indicate whether HCV positive (should not preclude workup for other secondary causes)

vi. Endocapillary proliferative and exudative glomerulonephritis in the setting of HIV

*Post-streptococcal, staphylococcal-associated, other vii. Fibrillary or immunotactoid glomerulonephritis in the setting of HIV

viii. Other immune complex disease in the setting of HIV

II. Tubulointerstitial-dominanta

a. Tubulointerstitial injury in the setting of classic HIVAN

i. Hyaline droplet tubulopathy

ii. Tubular microcysts

iii. Tubulointerstitial inflammation

b. Acute tubular injury or acute tubular necrosis

i. Ischemic

ii. Toxic (associated with ART vs. other)

c. Drug-induced tubulointerstitial nephritis (other than ART)

i. Antibiotics

ii. Proton pump inhibitors

iii. NSAIDs

iv. Other

d. Direct renal parenchymal infection by pathogens (bacterial, viral, fungal, protozoal, etc.)

e. Immunologic dysfunction-related tubulointerstitial inflammation

i. Diffuse infiltrative lymphocytosis syndrome (DILS)

ii. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)

f. Other tubulointerstitial inflammation in the setting of HIV

III. Vascular-dominanta

a. Thrombotic microangiopathy in the setting of HIV

b. Arteriosclerosis

IV. Other, in the setting of HIV infection

a. Diabetic nephropathy

b. Age-related nephrosclerosis

ART, antiretroviral therapy; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; HIVAN, HIV-associated nephropathy; NOS, not otherwise specified; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PLA2R, M-type phospholipase A2 receptor. a Indicates likelihood of HIV causality. b Indicates association with APOL1 risk allele genotype.

sive podocyte foot process effacement and proteinuria, with absent or minimal immune complex deposition. There is a well-established causal relationship between HIVAN and HIV infection, mediated by direct HIV infection of renal epithelial cells, intrare-nal Viral gene expression, and dysregulation of host genes governing cell differentiation and cell cycle.5 The role of genetic susceptibility in the pathogenesis

of HIVAN and other podocytopathies is discussed in detail in the next section.

We recommend distinguishing classic HIVAN from FSGS (NOS) in the setting of HIV infection. Direct causality of HIV can only be established with reasonable certainty in classic HIVAN and congenital cases of podocytopathy in infants born to HIV-positive mothers. We recommend that the biopsy report should indicate the degree of certainty that the pathology is causally related to HIV infection as high, moderate, or low.

Classic HIVAN. Classic HIVAN is defined as collapsing glomerulopathy and attendant tubulointersti-tial disease, including tubular microcyst formation, interstitial inflammation, and tubular injury (Figure 1).6,7 Glomerular "collapse" is defined as at least 1 glomerulus with collapse of glomerular basement membranes accompanied by hypertrophy and hyper-plasia of the overlying glomerular epithelial cells. These hyperplastic cells may fill the urinary space, forming pseudocrescents.8,9

By electron microscopy, diffuse podocyte foot process effacement and endothelial tubuloreticular inclusions (interferon footprints) are Classic features.6,7 By immunofluorescence, there may be staining for IgM, C3, and Clq in collapsed segments and mesangial areas.7 Protein resorption droplets may stain for albumin and Ig. In late stages, the sclerotic tuft is retracted into a tight solid sphere, capped by a monolayer of cobblestone epithelium; this has been described as resembling a "fetal glomerulus."10 Phe-notypic studies suggest that the glomerular epithelial cell monolayer is composed of parietal epithelial cells.8 In some cases, sequential biopsy and postmortem studies have shown an evolution from collapsing glomerulopathy to FSGS (NOS).7

Tubulointerstitial disease is an invariable component of HIVAN and often appears out of proportion to the glomerular disease,6,7 causing kidney enlargement and hyperechoic appearance by ultrasound. Tubular microcysts are dilated tubules (at least 3-fold larger than normal) containing glassy proteinaceous casts and lined by simplified epithelium. Tubular micro-cysts are easily distinguished from tubular thyroidiza-tion based on their larger diameter, irregular size, and the absence of tubular atrophy or colloid-type casts.11 The microcysts may involve all tubular segments, and intracellular viral transcript expression has been dem-onstrated.12 Prominent interstitial inflammation7 and tubular degenerative and regenerative changes may also occur.13 Interstitial edema in the acute phase is followed by fibrosis and tubular atrophy.

FSGS (NOS) in the setting of HIV. In ART-treat-

ed patients, noncollapsing FSGS (NOS) is more commonly encountered at biopsy.9,14-16 Causality is presumed when no other etiology for FSGS can be identified. Viral load is often undetectable, and biopsy findings may be difficult to distinguish from arterionephrosclerosis of hypertension, aging, and APOL1 -associated nephropathy. Such cases typically lack prominent tubulointerstitial disease, and the degree of podocyte effacement is generally less severe than in HIVAN (Figure 1). These differences have been hypothesized to reflect attenuation of the renal phenotype by ART.9

Podocytopathy in perinatal HIV infection. In addition to classic HIVAN, children with perinatal HIV infection can present with minimal change disease or diffuse mesangial hypercellularity with numerous en-dothelial tubuloreticular inclusions and marked foot process effacement.17 Tubular microcysts and interstitial inflammation are often lacking. Such cases are rare in the ART era.

Glomerular-dominant diseases: immune complex kidney disease in the setting of HIV. Numerous forms of immune complex-mediated glomerular disease have been reported in HIV-positive individuals.18 We recommend that the commonly used term "HIV immune complex kidney disease" (HIVICK) be replaced with a specific description of the pattern of immune complex disease "in the setting of HIV." The rationale for this approach is the heterogeneous spectrum of disease and the lack of certainty of HIV causality in most cases. Early studies that eluted glomerular immune deposits and demonstrated immune complexes containing HIV antigen and specific anti-HIV antibody were performed on a small number of well-characterized cases in the research setting and are not practicable in routine pathology laboratories.19,20 Reflex diagnosis as HIVICK may preclude workup for other secondary, treatable causes.

A unique lupus-like nephritis with full-house immune staining but negative serologies and no clinical signs of systemic lupus erythematosus has been reported in HIV-positive individuals;21 true lupus nephritis also occurs.22 It remains unclear whether IgA nephropathy in the setting of HIV is coincidental and related to undergalactosylated IgA1 or due to deposition of IgA directed to viral antigen, as demonstrated in a well-characterized case.19 An unusual ultrastructural appearance of subepithelial deposits, or "ball in cup" lesion, has been described in reports from South Africa,10,23 but is rarely observed in other settings. Other secondary causes should be sought in cases of membranous nephropathy (i.e., hepatitis B virus co-infection or anti-PLA2R autoantibodies) and

membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (hepatitis C virus co-infection).24-26

Tubulointerstitial disease in the setting of HIV. As described above, classic HIVAN is a pan-neph-ropathy with an important tubulointerstitial compo-nent;6,7 in biopsies with under-sampled glomeruli, the characteristic glomerular lesions may not be demonstrable. Acute tubular necrosis may occur in association with sepsis, volume depletion, and other ischemic or toxic insults.4 The commonly used antiretroviral agent tenofovir disoproxil fumarate can cause proximal tubulopathy with characteristic dysmorphic mitochrondria (Figure 2).27 Tubu-lointerstitial nephritis can occur secondary to antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, protease inhibitors, and other medications, as well as in response to mycobacterial infection.28-30 Direct infection of the renal parenchyma by other pathogens can also occur.7

Two rare but distinct forms of tubulointerstitial injury relate to immunologic dysfunction in the setting of HIV infection. Diffuse infiltrative lymphocytosis syndrome is a hyperimmune reaction against HIV that involves the kidneys in approximately 10% of cases.31-33 Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome is an inflammatory disorder associated with paradoxical unmasking or worsening of preexisting infectious processes after ART initiation,34 rarely involving the kidney. Both conditions are characterized by prominent CD8 T-Cell infiltrates.

Vascular-dominant diseases in the setting of HIV. Thrombotic microangiopathy was reported in the early years of the AIDS epidemic, but is rare in the ART era.35 A role for direct endothelial dysregulation by HIV has been proposed.36

Other pathologies in the setting of HIV. As patients with HIV infection age, comorbid kidney diseases such as diabetic nephropathy and arterionephroscle-rosis are increasingly common. When secondary FSGS develops in these contexts, the potential overlap with HIV-related podocytopathy can be diagnosti-cally challenging. Molecular approaches demonstrating renal epithelial cell infection by HIV have been used in the research setting for decades, but have not been incorporated into routine diagnostic practice.37 In addition to these established approaches, several novel and emerging techniques could be incorporated into research and diagnostic renal pathology to better characterize the causal relationship between HIV and specific histologic lesions and to further delineate the host pathways involved. The conference attendees identified several particularly relevant techniques (Supplementary Table S1).38 39

Figure 1. Classic HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) not otherwise specified (NOS) in the setting of HIV. (a,b) Classic HIVAN shows typical global collapse of the glomerular tuft with loss of luminal patency and hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the overlying glomerular epithelial cells, some of which contain intracytoplasmic protein resorption droplets (a, Jones methenamine silver x400; b, Masson trichrome, x400). (c) The tubulointerstitium shows focal tubular microcysts (arrow) containing glassy casts, associated with tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and inflammation (Masson trichrome, x200). (d) There is marked foot process effacement overlying the collapsed capillaries associated with glomerular epithelial cell hyperplasia forming a pseudocrescent. Some glomerular epithelial cells contain numerous intracytoplasmic protein resorption droplets. No immune-type electron dense deposits are seen (electron micrograph x4000). (e) Glomerular endothelial cells may contain intracytoplasmic tubuloreticular inclusions (arrows). Foot processes are effaced (electron micrograph, x40,000). (f) FSGS (NOS) in the setting of HIV shows discrete segmental scars with segmental adhesions to Bowman's capsule. No collapsing features or glomerular epithelial cell hyperplasia are identified (H&E, x400). To optimize viewing of this image, please see the online version of this article at www.kidney-international.org.

Figure 2. Tenofovir nephrotoxicity. (a) Acute tenofovir nephrotoxicity is characterized by irregular proximal tubular profiles with atypical, irregular lining epithelial cells and mild interstitial edema (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification x200). (b) The atypical proximal tubular cells display loss of brush border, marked irregularity of tubular epithelial height and shape, focal shedding of cytoplasmic fragments, and enlarged atypical nuclei with prominent nucleoli (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification x400). (c) Chronic nephrotoxicity displays increased separation of the irregular proximal tubules by interstitial fibrosis and mild inflammation with focal tubular atrophy (Masson trichrome, original magnification x200). The tubules show focal loss and flattening of lining epithelium leaving some desquamated tubular basement membranes, as well as prominent epithelial simplification and irregularity with atypical nuclei. (d) There is intervening interstitial fibrosis and mild inflammation, without tubulitis (Masson trichrome, original magnification x400). (e) The characteristic features are focal giant mitochondria with few residual peripheral cristae (arrow) within the proximal tubular epithelial cells, as well as cytoplasmic swelling with disruption of brush border, (electron micrograph, original magnification x8000). (f) In some cases, the dysmorphic mitochrondria exhibit irregular size and shape with bizarre patterning of their cristae (electron micrograph, original magnification x12,000). To optimize viewing of this image, please see the online version of this article at www.kidney-international.org.

Genetics/genomics of kidney disease in the setting of HIV infection

Classic HIVAN occurs predominantly in individuals of African ancestry, with 18- to 50-fold increased prevalence.40 Two studies involving mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium published in 2008 identified a region on chromosome 22 strongly associated with idiopathic FSGS and HIVAN in African Americans;41,42 however, fine-mapping revealed no coding variants to explain the association of intronic singlenucleotide polymorphisms in the candidate gene MYH9 with kidney disease.43,44 Subsequently, using data from the 1000 Genomes Project, Genovese et al. identified 2 missense variants (G1 allele) and a 6 bp deletion (G2 allele) in the adjacent APOL1 gene that were recessively associated with FSGS and nondiabetic ESKD.45 APOL1 encodes apolipopro-tein L1, which confers innate immunity against most strains of Trypanosoma brucei;46,47 G2 variants extend immunity to T.b. rhodesiense and G1 associates with asymptomatic carriage of T.b. gambiense, the causes of acute and chronic African human trypanosomia-sis, respectively.45,48 Coding variants in APOL1 are present only on African-ancestry haplotypes.49,50

APOL1 was strongly associated with FSGS (odds ratio [OR] 17) and HIVAN (OR 29) in African Americans and with HIVAN in South Africans (OR 89).4951 In contrast, HIV-positive Ethiopians, who lack APOL1 risk variants, do not develop HIVAN.52 Subsequent studies have confirmed the strong association between the high-risk genotypes and the diagnosis of HIVAN (Table 2). The estimated lifetime risk associated with carrying 2 APOL1 risk alleles is 4% for FSGS in the absence of HIV infection, and as high as 50% for HIVAN (Supplementary Table S2).53 Despite the strong association, ~20% to 30% of African Americans with HIVAN have 0 or 1 APOL1 risk allele, suggesting that other genetic, viral, or environmental factors contribute to HIVAN.54 Characteristics of APOL1--mediated kidney disease are summarized in Table 3.

Table 2

Prevalence of APOL1 high-risk genotypes and association with kidney disease in HIV-positive African Americans and Black South Africans

Histology Population Population controls Cases Odds ratio (95% CD Refer-ence

HIVAN African American (n = 54) 13% 72% 29 (14,68) 49

HIVAN African American (n = 60) 13% 62% - 54

HIVAN South Africa (n = 38) 3% 79% 89 (18,912) 51

HIV +FSGS African American (n = 35) 13% 63% 57

HIV + FSGS South Africa (n = 22) 3% 8% 2.1 (0.03, 44) 51

HIV + ICD African American (n = 31) 13% 3% 57

HIV + ICD South Africa (n = 12) 3% 25% 5.6 (0.4, 86) 51

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

APOI1, apolipoprotein L1; Cl, confidence interval; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; HIVAN, HlV-associated nephropathy; ICD, immune complex kidney disease.

The distribution of the APOL1 coding variants varies greatly among sub-Saharan African populations, with the highest frequencies reported in Western Africa (>40% for G1) and much lower frequencies elsewhere in Africa (Supplementary Figure Sl).50,52,55 As a consequence of the West African diaspora in the Americas and more recent African emigrations, APOL1 variants are widely dispersed globally (e.g., 21% and 13% for G1 and G2, respectively, in African Americans).45,50

Prediction of histology. Given the strong genetic association, investigators in the United States (US)

Table 3

Features of APOLI-mediated kidney disease in the setting of HIV

MYH9 variants are not independently associated with HIVAN or FSGS (NOS) 45 52 152

APOL1 kidney disease manifests as HIVAN or FSGS (NOS) with or without microcystic tubular dilatation 49 56 57

S342G and N388Y389/- confer risk of kidney disease; therefore genotyping only the APOL1 G1 rs73885319 missense and G2

rs71785313 indel (i.e., insertion-deletion mutations) variants are sufficient to determine risk of CKD49

HIVAN is associated with low CD4+ cell counts, and often improves with effective ART56

HIV-associated FSGS is associated with higher CD4+ cell counts and occurs in patients undergoing ART56

APOL1 high-risk genotypes are associated with progression to ESKD in HIV-positive patients with non-HIVAN kidney diseases57

Histological features of HIVAN in patients carrying 2 copies of APOL1 risk variants are similar to those carrying 0 or 1 copy54

HIV-positive children with CKD and high-risk genotypes have lower eGFR and experience more rapid progression 58, 153

Multiple mechanisms have been proposed for APOL1-mediated podocyte injury, but they converge in perturbations of endosomal

trafficking, increased membrane permeability, and cytotoxicity 61, 63-65

APOL1, a component of the innate immune system, is up-regulated by interferons 61,62

High levels of APOL1 may be a "second hit" and sufficient to cause kidney disease 61, 62

evaluated whether APOL1 genotype could be used to predict HIVAN or FSGS (NOS) histology in HIVpositive patients of African descent.56 Inclusion of the high-risk genotype did not significantly add to a predictive model including CD4+ cell count and HIV-RNA, suggesting that APOL1 genotype cannot replace kidney biopsy for definitive diagnosis of HIVAN.

Carriage of APOL1 high-risk genotypes in HIVpositive individuals is not associated with immune complex kidney disease (Table 2). In a US series, high-risk genotypes were present in only 3% of patients with biopsy-proven immune complex disease.57 Similarly, in a South African series, high-risk genotypes were present in 79% of HIVAN cases but in only 25% of those with HIV and immune complex kidney disease.51

Renal survival and ESKD risk. In general population studies, the high-risk APOL1 genotypes have been associated with increased risk of CKD progression and with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).58 In children with perinatal HIV infection, those with a high-risk genotype had 3-fold increased odds of CKD and presented at a younger median age compared with those with 0 or 1 risk allele.51 In HIV-positive adults with non-HIVAN kidney disease on biopsy, carriage of 2 APOL1 risk alleles was associated with more rapid progression and a 2-fold greater risk of ESKD.57 Carriage of 2 APOL1 risk alleles has been associated with proteinuria in HIV-infected women and with accelerated decline in longitudinal kidney function in unsuppressed HIV-infected

men.59,60

Mechanisms of APOL1-mediated disease. Two APOL1 risk alleles are required to confer increased risk of kidney disease. However, the presence of high-risk genotypes in healthy populations suggests that disease expression requires a "second hit," such as infections (e.g., HIV or viral hepatitis), interferon, gene-gene interactions, illicit drug use, and other CKD risk factors.

The mechanism of APOLl-mediated kidney disease is currently unknown. Evidence from in vitro experiments in human cells and APOL1 transgenic mouse models suggests that interferon upregulates APOL1 expression, causing podocyte injury.61,62 In-tracellular apolipoprotein L1 in renal epithelium may cause apoptosis or autophagy by increasing cellular and mitochondrial membrane permeability.63-65 In cell culture, G1 and G2 APOL1 variants induce intracel-lular loss of potassium, cell swelling, and cell lysis.66 Studies in yeast, Drosophila, and human cells indicate that variant apolipoprotein L1 depolarizes cell

membranes, which disrupts intracellular processes including endosomal trafficking, vesicle acidification, and mitochondrial function.63-65

In vivo, the expression of high-risk APOL1 variants in transgenic mouse models has produced variable effects. In a model with inducible APOL1 expression, high-risk variants disrupted endosomal trafficking and vesicle acidification, similar to the effects observed in vitro. Affected animals developed podocyte death, proteinuria, and glomerulosclero-sis.61 However, another transgenic mouse model with constitutive expression of APOL1-G2 did not develop kidney disease.67

APOL1 is encoded in the genome of only a few primate species, complicating the extrapolation of data from murine models. Mechanistic studies have also been limited by the use of overexpression assays. In vitro, the overexpression of wild-type APOLl-GO in cultured human renal epithelial cells also induces cell death, suggesting that the overexpression model

may not be biologically relevant.62,68,69

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) nephrotoxicity

HIV treatment guidelines recommend immediate initiation of ART in all HIV-positive individuals. Immuno-virological control is an important strategy to reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and HIV-related kidney diseases.70-73

The presence of CKD affects the Choice and dosing of renally cleared antiretrovirals. Kidney function and CKD risk factors should be assessed prior to ART initiation (Figure 3). CKD risk scores have been developed to guide clinicians, although future studies are needed to determine their utility in diverse populations (Supplementary Table S3).74,75

The widely used antiretroviral agent tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is generally safe and well tolerated, but has important potential for cumulative nephrotoxicity. Sub-clinical proximal tubular dysfunction (low-level proteinuria and excessive phosphaturia) is common, and approximately 1% to 2% of recipients develop treatment-limiting tubu-lopathy.76 Risk factors for tubulopathy include aging, immunodeficiency, diabetes, prolonged exposure, and concomitant use of didanosine or ritonavir-boost-ed protease inhibitors.77 Severe tubulopathy may progress to eGFR decline, osteomalacia, and pathological fractures. In large observational studies, TDF has also been associated with decreased eGFR or creatinine clearance,78,79 as well as with rapid eGFR decline and proteinuria.78,79 Co-administration of TDF with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors increases the risk.78,79 Although not well studied, the newer

Perform CKD risk stratification

Low risk H High risk

eGFR >90

uPCR <200

Age <50

eGFR <70

uPCR >500

Age >60

Hepatitis C co-infaction Immunodeficiency Diabetes mellitus Uncontrolled hypertension History of cardiovascular disease

Figure 3. Recommendations at starting

ART. *If suitable alternatives available. ART, antiretroviral therapy; ATV, atazanavir; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI, expressed in ml/min per 1.73 m2); IDV, indinavir; LPV, lopinavir; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; uPCR, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (values above are in mg/g; multiply by 0.10 to obtain values in mg/mmol).

Standard ART (local guidelines)

Avoid nephrotoxic ART* (TDF, IDV, ATV, LPV)

pharmacoenhancer cobicistat also increases tenofovir exposure and may increase the risk of toxicity. TDF discontinuation and switches from TDF to the newer prodrug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) have been associated with improved kidney function, although the long-term safety of TAF is not known.80-83

Any drug (antiretroviral or other) may cause interstitial nephritis. New-onset eGFR decline or proteinuria should prompt careful review of CKD risk factors and medications.29,84 Among antiretrovirals, atazanavir and indinavir have been most commonly linked to interstitial nephritis and nephrolithiasis; other protease inhibitors have been implycated in case

reports.85-89

Observational cohort studies have also linked ata-zanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir to rapid eGFR decline and incident CKD,78,79 and switching from ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or lopinavir to boosted darunavir has been associated with improved kidney function.90 In settings where TAF, abacavir, and darunavir are available, the use of TDF, atazanavir, and lopinavir/ ritonavir should ideally be avoided in those with CKD, rapid eGFR decline (>3-5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year), or at high CKD risk. The threshold for avoiding or discontinuing these agents may be influenced by local circumstances. In resource-limited settings, TDF dose adaptation may be an option. Dual therapy (i.e., boosted protease inhibitor plus lamivudine or raltegravir) has been proposed as a way to avoid concomitant use of boosted protease inhibitors with TDF, thereby minimizing the nephrotoxic potential.91-93

Pharmacological considerations. Several antiret-rovirals require dose adjustment in individuals with

decreased eGFR (Supplementary Table S4). If continued use of TDF is required when eGFR is <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (or <70 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with eGFR decline), dose adjustment should be considered.

Drug-drug interactions are common with ART. Several antiretrovirals induce or inhibit absorption (through P-glycoprotein), hepatic metabolism (through the cytochrome P450 system or glucuro-nidation), and/or tubular excretion (through organic anion and cation transporters, and multidrug resistant or multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins) of co-administered medications. We recommend that Clinicians consult available resources such as www.hiv-druginteractions.org.

CKD progression and ESKD in the setting of HIV infection

Risk factors for CKD. Both HIV-related and traditional CKD risk factors influence CKD development and progression (Figure 4). With improved longevity among HIV-positive individuals, traditional CKD risk factors, particularly hypertension and diabetes, are of increasing concern world-wide.94-96 Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and hepatitis C Virus (HCV) co-infections are associated with a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of progressive CKD.97,98 Other co-infections such as tuberculosis and syphilis may also contribute to CKD risk.99-101 In addition, severe AKI has been associated with a 3.8- to 20-fold increased risk of progression to ESKD.102

CKD screening and monitoring. Studies to inform the optimal CKD screening and monitoring strategies among HIV-positive individuals are lacking. Until

Figure 4. Risk factors and underlying etiologies of CKD in HIV-positive individuals. APOL1, apolipoprotein L1; ABCC, ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins; ART, antiretrovial therapy; CKD, chronic kidney disease; FSGS (NOS), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, not otherwise specified; GN, glomerulonephritis; HIVAN, HIV-associated nephropathy.

Figure 5. Recommendations for kidney disease screening and monitoring in HIV-positive adults. *Urinalysis should be performed in all HIV-positive individuals to detect worsening or new onset of proteinuria or hematuria. Where feasible, quantification of proteinuria (spot urine albumin-to-creatinine or protein-to-creatinine ratio) should also be performed. **More frequent monitoring is recommended in persons who are clinically unstable, severely immunocompromised, or viremic. AKI, acute kidney injury; ART, antiretroviral therapy; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CKD-EPI, CKD Epidemiology Collaboration; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; KDIGO, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Table 4

Recommendations for management of CKD risk factors in HIV-positive individuals

Risk factor Recommendations

Hypertension

Nonproteinuric Target systolic blood pressure < 140 mm Hg116

Proteinuric Target systolic blood pressure < 130 mm Hg116 Preferred antihypertensive: ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers116

Diabetes mellitus Target hemoglobin A1c ~ 7%*103

Hepatitis B virus co-infection Treat per existing guidelines118121 TAF may be used in patients with eGFR > 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. 154 Where TAF is unavailable or in patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, dose-adjusted TDF or entecavir may be considered.

Hepatitis C virus co-infection Treatment per existing guidelines120, 155 In patients with HCV genotypes 1 and 4 and CKD G4-5, ribavirin-free grazoprevir/elbasvir 156-158 or glecaprevir/ pibrentasvir regimens may be effective164, 165 In patients with genotypes 2, 3, 5, and 6 and CKD G4-5, the pan-genotypic glecaprevir/pibrentasvir regimen can be used 164, 165; sofosbuvir-based regimens can be used in patients with any genotype, but should be avoided or dose adjusted in patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 159-161 In addition, the combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir with TDF should be avoided.

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HCV, hepatitis C;

TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

*Hemoglobin A1c may underestimate glycemia in HIV-positive individuals 162 163

such studies exist, current CKD guidelines should be followed.2,103 CKD screening is recommended at the time of HIV diagnosis and ART initiation or modification (Figure 5).

Serum creatinine is the preferred biomarker for estimating GFR.2,103 Serum cystatin C may be considered in patients receiving medications that alter tubular creatinine handling. Cystatin C may also better predict long-term mortality,104,105 but is susceptible to bias in the setting of inflammation. The serum creatinine-based CKD-EPI equation is generally preferred;2,103 however, none of the available estimates have been validated in diverse populations or in the setting of drugs that alter creatinine secretion.106-108 Use of the antiretrovirals dolutegravir or rilinirine or the pharmacoenhancers ritonavir or cobicistat may result in average reductions in calculated creatinine clearance of around 5 to 20 ml/min, which should be taken into account when interpreting eGFR or creati-nine clearance.109 Clinicians should also be aware that serum creatinine measurements may not be standardized in resource-limited regions and that extrarenal factors may alter both serum creatinine and cystatin C concentrations (Supplementary Table S5).110-112 Rather than a single eGFR value, eGFR trajectories are useful for identifying individuals with progressive decline in kidney function.

Urinalysis should be performed in all HIV-positive individuals to detect worsening or new onset of pro-teinuria or hematuria. Where feasible, quantification of proteinuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine or pro-tein-to-creatinine ratio) should also be performed. In individuals receiving TDF, urinalysis may also detect glycosuria, and plasma phosphate should be moni-

tored if possible. Evaluation of cystatin C, low-molecular weight ("tubular") proteinuria, or phosphate reabsorption is not indicated in individuals with stable kidney function and no indication of TDF toxicity.113

In most HIV-positive individuals who are stable on ART, annual monitoring of kidney function appears appropriate. In those with or at increased risk of CKD and those who receive TDF with ritonavir- or cobicistat-boosted protease inhibitors, more frequent monitoring is recommended, typically 2-4 times per year depending on risk factors.113 Kidney function should also be carefully monitored during hospitali-zation, particularly in individuals receiving TDF and concomitant nephrotoxic medications.

If CKD is identified, patients should undergo workup based on available resources and risk stratification, including consideration of potential medication tox-icity; screening for hypertension, diabetes, and co-infections; and assessment of region-specific risk factors such as traditional medicines. HIV-specific CKD risk scores may facilitate risk-stratification,74,75 although these scores have not been validated in diverse populations or in resource-limited settings (Supplementary Table S3). Referral to a nephrologist should be considered in certain settings (Figure 5).103 When the cause of CKD is unclear, CKD progression is rapid, or prognostication is needed, a kidney biopsy should be considered.

CKD management. Evidence from observational studies strongly supports the beneficial effect of early ART initiation on the risk of classic HIVAN.114 The impact of ART on CKD progression in patients with immune complex kidney diseases is more vari-

able.7172 Given the overwhelming benefit on survival, ART is recommended for all HIV-positive individuals.115 Evaluation of other treatment strategies for kidney disease in the setting of HIV has been limited to small, single-center studies with short duration, and has focused largely on HIVAN (Supplementary Table S6). No rigorous study has evaluated the efficacy of blood pressure control, diabetes treatment, or angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in slowing CKD progression in HIV-positive individuals. However, extrapolating from the strong evidence supporting the efficacy of these interventions in the general population is reasonable (Table 4).103116117 Treatment of HBV, HCV, and tuberculosis co-infections should be considered based on existing treatment guidelines.118-121

Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in HIV-positive individuals. With ART, survival of HIV-positive individuals receiving KRT is comparable to their HIV-negative counter-parts.122 Therefore, HIV serostatus should not influence candidacy for KRT. Observational studies demonstrate similar outcomes between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) among ART-treated individuals, and modality selection depends upon patient preference and regional resources.123,124 Arteriovenous fistulas are the preferred vascular access, as arteriovenous grafts and catheters are associated with higher risk of infection and thrombosis.125 There is no evidence supporting isolation of HIV-positive patients in HD units, except those with HBV co-infection. 126 Dialyzer reuse by the same patient is practiced in resource-limited settings as a cost-saving alternative. Evidence supporting the safety of dialyzer reuse by HIV-positive individuals is limited,127,128 and precautions must be adhered to in order to avoid HIV transmission to other patients and dialysis staff. HIV-positive PD patients may have

Table 5

Selection criteria for potential HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

> Meets standard criteria for kidney transplant recipients, plus the following:

> Effective HIV suppression for > 6 months prior to transplantation

- Undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA

- CD4+ cell count > 200 cells/mm3

> No active opportunistic infections

> No history of:

- Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

- Primary central nervous system lymphoma

- Pulmonary aspergillosis

- Visceral Kaposi's sarcoma

- Coccidiomycosis

- Chronic intestinal cryptosporidiosis >1 month

> Hepatology evaluation for patients co-infected with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus

Criteria adapted from Stock et al. and Muller E et al. 132, 137

higher risk of PD catheter infections; however, PD catheter failure rates are similar in HIV-negative pa-tients.129 PD consumables must be discarded properly, as HIV persists in PD materials and fluid.130,131

Kidney transplantation in HIV-positive individuals. Kidney transplantation in HIV-positive recipients is associated with excellent 1-year and 3-year recipient and allograft survival rates, intermediate to those observed in the overall US kidney transplant population and in a higher risk subgroup of recipients 265 years of age.132 Registry data also suggest good 5- and 10-year outcomes, with an improvement in survival compared with patients who remain on the wait-list.133 Studies in other settings have confirmed the safety of kidney transplantation in individuals with well-controlled HIV.132,134-138 Eligible patients with advanced CKD and well-controlled HIV infection should be referred for kidney transplant evaluation (Table 5).

Immunosuppressant protocols for the general population can be applied to HIV-positive individuals. In view of the increased immunological risk, some centers prefer induction therapy with an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, polyclonal antithymocyte globulin, or alemtuzumab.132,134,139 Tacrolimus is the calcineurin inhibitor of choice for maintenance immunosuppres-sion.132,140

Existing guidelines for prophylaxis against opportunistic infections141,142 and management of hepatitis co-infection should be followed.143,144 Outcomes for HCV-co-infected recipients are poorer compared with recipients with HIV or HCV mono-infection, but are still superior to those of patients who remain on the wait-list. Clinicians should be aware of significant drug-drug interactions among immunosuppressive agents, ART, and antiviral medications for HCV co-infection. To minimize drug-drug interactions and achieve steady-state drug levels, integrase inhibitors and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are the preferred antiretroviral agents, while protease inhibitors and the pharmacoenhancers ritonavir and cobici-stat are best avoided.145 Given the complexity of issues, a multidisciplinary team comprising experts in transplant nephrology, infectious disease, and clinical pharmacology is imperative.

Given the strong association between the APOL1 risk variants and HIVAN, HIV-positive recipients of African descent and those who receive an allograft from a donor of African descent should be monitored for recurrent HIVAN.146 The relative contribution of donor and recipient APOL1 risk status to the risk of HIVAN recurrence is the subject of ongoing research. The APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes (APOLLO) Research Network147 will investi-

Table 6

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

Controversies, knowledge gaps, and areas for future research

Renal pathology

- What is the spectrum of renal pathology in the setting of HIV infection in the current era and in diverse patient populations?

- How do pathologic features correlate with the duration of ART HIV viral load, racial and geographic origin, and APOL1 risk allele genotype?

- What is the relative contribution of de-differentiated podocytes versus parietal epithelial cells to the glomerular epithelial cell hyperplasia seen in HIVAN?

- What are the roles of specific HIV transcript expression in promoting proliferation and possible transdifferentiation of podocytes and parietal epithelial cells, and in mediating the tubular phenotype of cell cycle arrest and microcyst formation?

- What is the pattern of HIV viral transcript expression in specific renal cell types and tissue compartments in FSGS (NOS) and other non-HIVAN lesions in the setting of HIV?

- Is FSGS (NOS) in the setting of HIV representative of attenuated orpartially treated HIVAN?

- How can immune complex disease that is causally related to HIV infection be distinguished from coincident disease?

- Can HIV infection of renal dendritic cells, infiltrating monocyte and/or macrophages, or intrinsic renal epithelial cells produce a viral reservoir that is capable of reactivation?

- What is the composition of the inflammatory infiltrates in HIV-related tubulointerstitial disease?

Genetics and genomics

- What is the prevalence of APOL1 risk alleles among ethnic and tribal populations in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in central and southeastern Africa?

- What is the prevalence of APOL1 risk alleles in African admixed populations as a consequence of the African diaspora in Central and South America and in the Caribbean?

- What other genes or viral or environmental factors cause HIVAN in 30% of individuals with 0 or 1 APOL1 risk allele? Why is HIVAN not observed more frequently in other populations lacking APOL1 risk alleles?

- Why do APOL1 gain-of-function variants show recessive inheritance?

- Is a single copy of APOL1 G1 or G2 sufficient to cause HIVAN in a setting of HIV infection?

- What are the genetic and environmental factors that affect penetrance of APOL1, and does APOL1 penetrance differ by ethnicity or ancestry?

- What is the role of APOL1 in children with HIV infection?

- What are the mechanisms by which APOL1 precipitates kidney disease? Do these mechanisms differ in the setting of HIV infection?

- Is APOL1 an initiator of HIVAN or a progression factor?

- What are the public health implications of APOL1 testing in resource-limited settings?

Antiretroviral therapy and nephrotoxicity

- What is the clinical significance of TDF-induced subclinical renal tubular dysfunction, and what is the value of monitoring for low-molecular weight proteinuria and reduced phosphate reabsorption in patients undergoing TDF?

- What is the rate of TDF nephrotoxicity in individuals without access to regular kidney function monitoring, including HIV-negative individuals taking TDF to prevent HIV infection?

- What is the long-term renal safety of TAF in individuals with a history of TDF-associated nephrotoxicity, CKD, or relevant comorbidities?

- What is the long-term safety of TAF in children, particularly with respect to bone health?

- Would epidemiologic studies linking ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors to decreased eGFR yield similar results with cystatin C-based eGFR estimates?

Management of CKD and ESKD

- What are the optimal strategies for assessing and monitoring kidney health among ART-treated adults and children in resource-rich and resource-limited settings?

- Are existing CKD risk scores developed in HIV-positive US and European populations valid in other populations?

- How well do creatinine-based eGFR estimates predict true GFR in ART-treated individuals, especially those undergoing ART that interferes with creatinine secretion and in sub-Saharan African populations?

- What is the role of serum cystatin C, alone or in combination with creatinine, in evaluating kidney function in specific clinical contexts, such as the use of ART that interferes with creatinine secretion?

- What is the clinical utility of novel urine biomarkers of kidney injury in assessing and monitoring kidney health?

- Are clinical guidelines for diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease developed in the general populations effective in preventing CKD onset and progression in HIV-positive individuals?

- Do ACE inhibitors and ARBs confer similar renoprotective effects among HIV-positive individuals with CKD as in the general population?

- What is the impact of tuberculosis co-infection and its treatment on the risks of CKD development and progression among HIV-positive individuals?

- What is the role of adjunctive therapy with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive therapy in patients with HIVAN or other kidney disease that may be causally related to HIV infection?

- What is the role of HIV infection in immune complex kidney disease, and what is the optimal therapy for specific immune complex diseases in this setting?

- Has the epidemiology of acute kidney injury changed in the era of modern ART, and what is the impact on CKD risk in the setting of HIV?

- What is the optimal antiviral therapy for HBV or HCV co-infection with regard to efficacy and safety in HIV-positive individuals?

- Does treatment of HBV or HCV co-infection impact CKD prognosis?

- How does the peritonitis risk among ART-treated HIV-positive patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis compare with that of their HIV-negative counterparts?

- Are existing treatment guidelines for catheter-related infections developed in HIV-negative populations effective among HIV-positive patients with ESKD?

- What are the optimal strategies for anemia and mineral-bone disease management in the HIV-positive population with CKD or ESKD?

Kidney transplantation

- Among HIV-positive patients being considered for kidney transplantation, what is the optimal timing of HBV or HCV treatment relative to kidney transplantation? This is particularly important based on the worse post-transplant outcomes among recipients with HIV-HCV co-infection.

- What is the optimal induction therapy for highly sensitized HIV-positive transplant recipients?

- What are the optimal ART and immunosuppressive regimens for HIV positive kidney transplant recipients?

- What is the optimal strategy for selecting and matching potential HIV positive organ donors and recipients?

- What are the long-term implications of HIV-to-HIV kidney transplantation on patient and allograft outcomes and HIV disease course?

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; APOL1, apolipoprotein L1; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ART, antiretroviral treatment; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C C; HIVAN, HIV-associated nephropathy; NOS, not otherwise specified; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; US, United States.

gate the influence of donor APOL1 risk variants on long-term outcomes among recipients and African American donors, including those with HIV.

Based on experience in South Africa, there is growing evidence to support the safety of kidney transplantation from HIV-positive donors.148,149 The US HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act allows the use of organs from HIV-positive donors in approved research programs.150,151 Questions remain about the implications of super-infection in settings where ART resistance is common.

Children and adolescents with HIV

As in adults, CKD screening and monitoring are recommended, and ART should be provided as per international and regional guidelines (Supplementary Table S7).2,115

Conclusion

Despite improved survival with ART, HIV-positive individuals remain at increased risk for kidney disease. This report summarizes recommendations for diagnosis, management, and prevention of kidney disease in this population, including a proposed histologic classification. In the absence of data from randomized controlled trials, these recommendations reflect the expert opinion of conference attendees, incorporating combined clinical experience and evidence from observational studies and laboratory research. A second major outcome of this conference was the identification of knowledge gaps and areas for future research (Table 6), with the long-term goal of improving the diagnosis and management of kidney disease in HIV-positive individuals.

DISCLOSURE

The conference was sponsored by KDIGO and jointly held with African Association of Nephrology (AFRAN).

CRS declared owning stock equity from Aspen. MGA declared having received research support from National Institute on Drug Abuse and National Institutes of Health (N|H)/ National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). VDD declared having received research support from NlH/NIDDK. MME declared having received research support from NlH/NIDDK. FAP declared having received consultancy fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp 81 Dohme, and WW Healthcare; speaker honoraria from Astellas, Gilead Sciences, and Janssen; and research support from Gilead Sciences and WW Healthcare. NW declared having received consultancy fees from Adcock Ingram and research support from Medical Research Council of South Africa. DCW declared having received consultancy fees from Akebia, Amgen, Bio Nano Consulting, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen,

Otsuka, UCB Celltech, and Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma; speaker honoraria from Amgen, Fresenius Medical Care, Janssen, Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma, and Z5 Pharma; and research support from Australian National Health 81 Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, Kidney Research UK, and National Institute for Health Research. WCW declared having received consultancy fees from Akebia, AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Relypsa, and Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma. All the other authors declared no competing interests.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge AFRAN for accommodating the KDIGO conference on the final day of the AFRAN congress.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Appendix S1. Pathologic classification of kidney disease in the setting of HIV: detailed description.

Table S1. Established and emerging approaches for future research and diagnostic testing in renal pathology.

Table S2. Lifetime risk of HIVAN or FSGS (NOS) in the setting of HIV by number of APOL1 risk alleles.

Table S3. Risk scores for development of chronic kidney disease in patients with HIV.

Table S4. Antiretroviral dose adjustments in chronic kidney disease according to creatinine clearance (CrCl).

Table S5. Factors that affect serum creatinine and cystatin C levels in the setting of HIV.

Table S6. Treatment strategies for specific kidney diseases in the setting of HIV.

Table S7. Recommendations for HIV-positive children and adolescents.

Figure S1. APOL1 frequencies in geographic regions and among ethnic groups in Africa.

Supplementary References.

Supplementary material is linked to the online version of the paper at www.kidney-international.org.

REFERENCES

1. UNAIDS. AIDS info. Available at: http://aidsinfo.unaids. org/. Accessed July 19, 2017.

2. Lucas GM, Ross MJ, Stock PG, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of chronic kidney disease in patients infected with HIV: 2014 update by the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:e96-e138.

3. Rosenberg AZ, Naicker S, Winkler CA, et al. HIV-associated nephropathies: epidemiology, pathology, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11:150-160.

4. D'Agati V, Appel GB. HIV infection and the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8:138-152.

5. Ross MJ. Advances in the pathogenesis of HIV-associated kidney diseases. Kidney Int. 2014;86:266-274.

6. Cohen AH, Nast CC. HIV-associated nephropathy. A unique combined glomerular, tubular, and interstitial lesion. Mod Pathol. 1988;1:87-97.

7. D'Agati V, Suh JI, Carbone L, et al. Pathology of HIV-associ-ated nephropathy: a detailed morphologic and comparative study. Kidney Int. 1989;35:1358-1370.

8. Dijkman HB, Weening JJ, Smeets B, et al. Proliferating

cells in HIV and pamidronate-associated collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis are parietal epithelial cells. Kidney Int. 2006;70:338-344.

9. Wyatt CM, Klotman PE, D'Agati VD. HIV-associated nephropathy: clinical presentation, pathology, and epidemiology in the era of antiretroviral therapy. Semin Nephrol. 2008;28:513-522.

10. Wearne N, Swanepoel CR, Boulle A, et al. The spectrum of renal histologies seen in HIV with outcomes, prognostic indicators and clinical correlations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:4109-4118.

11. Nadasdy T, Laszik Z, Blick KE, et al. Tubular atrophy in the end-stage kidney: a lectin and immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol. 1994;25:22-28.

12. Ross MJ, Bruggeman LA, Wilson PD, et al. Microcyst formation and HIV-1 gene expression occur in multiple nephron segments in HIV-associated nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:2645-2651.

13. Rosenstiel PE, Gruosso T, Letourneau AM, et al. HIV-1 Vpr inhibits cytokinesis inhuman proximal tubule cells. Kidney Int. 2008;74:1049-1058.

14. Berliner AR, Fine DM, Lucas GM, et al. Observations on a cohort of HIV-infected patients undergoing native renal biopsy. Am J Nephrol. 2008;28:478-486.

15. Lescure FX, Flateau C, Pacanowski J, et al. HIV-associ-ated kidney glomerular diseases: changes with time and HAART. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:2349-2355.

16. Mallipattu SK, Salem F, Wyatt CM. The changing epidemiology of HIV related chronic kidney disease in the era of antiretroviral therapy. Kidney Int. 2014;86:259-265.

17. Strauss J, Abitbol C, Zilleruelo G, et al. Renal disease in children with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1989;321: 625-630.

18. Nobakht E, Cohen SD, Rosenberg AZ, et al. HIV-associated immune complex kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:291-300.

19. Kimmel PL, Phillips TM, Ferreira-Centeno A, et al. Brief report: idiotypic IgA nephropathy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:702-706.

20. Kimmel PL, Phillips TM, Ferreira-Centeno A, et al. HIV-associated immune-mediated renal disease. Kidney Int. 1993;44:1327-1340.

21. Haas M, Kaul S, Eustace JA. HIV-associated immune complex glomerulonephritis with "lupus-like" features: a clinico-pathologic study of 14 cases. Kidney Int. 2005;67:1381-1390.

22. Chang BG, Markowitz GS, Seshan SV, et al. Renal manifestations of concurrent systemic lupus erythematosus and HIV infection. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:441-449.

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

23. Gerntholtz TE, Goetsch SJ, Katz I. HIV-related nephropathy: a South African perspective. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1885-1891.

24. Cheng JT, Anderson HL Jr, Markowitz GS, et al. Hepatitis C virus associated glomerular disease in patients with human

immunodeficiency virus coinfection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10: 1566-1574.

25. Mohan S, Herlitz LC, Tan J, et al. The changing pattern of glomerular disease in HIV and hepatitis C co-infected patients in the era of HAART. Clin Nephrol. 2013;79:285-291.

26. Stokes MB, Chawla H, Brody RI, et al. Immune complex glomerulonephritis in patients coinfected with human

immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;29: 514-525.

27. Herlitz LC, Mohan S, Stokes MB, et al. Tenofovir nephrotoxicity: acute tubular necrosis with distinctive clinical, pathological, and mitochondrial abnormalities. Kidney Int. 2010;78:1171-1177.

28. Fine DM, Perazella MA, Lucas GM, et al. Kidney biopsy in HIV: beyond HIV-associated nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51:504-514.

29. Parkhie SM, Fine DM, Lucas GM, et al. Characteristics of patients with HIV and biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:798-804.

30. Zaidan M, Lescure FX, Brocheriou I, et al. Tubulointerstitial nephropathies in HIV-infected patients over the past 15 years: a clinicopathological study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:930-938.

31. Fox C, Walker-Bone K. Evolving spectrum of HIV-asso-ciated rheumatic syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29:244-258.

32. Yoo J, Baumstein D, Kuppachi S, et al. Diffuse infiltra-tive lymphocytosis syndrome presenting as reversible acute kidney injury associated with Gram-negative bacterial infection in patients with newly diagnosed HIV infection. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57:752-755.

33. Zafrani L, Coppo P, Dettwiler S, et al. Nephropathy associated with the diffuse infiltrative lymphocytosis syndrome. Kidney Int. 2007;72: 219-224.

34. Martin-Blondel G, Debard A, Laurent C, et al. Mycobacteri-al-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: a cause of acute interstitial nephritis during HIV infection. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26: 2403-2406.

35. Rarick MU, Espina B, Mocharnuk R, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Am J Hematol. 1992;40:103-109.

36. del Arco A, Martinez MA, Pena JM, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection: demonstration of p24 antigen in endothelial cells. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17:360-363.

37. Remark R, Merghoub T, Grabe N, et al. In-depth tissue profiling using multiplexed immunohistochemical consecutive staining on single slide. Sci Immunol. 2016;1:aaf6925.

38. Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat Methods. 2015;12:453-457.

39. Xu GJ, Kula T, Xu Q, et al. Viral immunology. Comprehensive serological profiling of human populations using a synthetic human virome. Science. 2015;348:aaa0698.

40. Kopp JB, Winkler C. HIV-associated nephropathy in African Americans. Kidney Int Suppl. 2003:S43-S49.

41. Kopp JB, Smith MW, Nelson GW, et al. MYH9 is a major-effect risk gene for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1175-1184.

42. Kao WH, Klag MJ, Meoni LA, et al. MYH9 is associated with non diabetic end-stage renal disease in African Americans. Nat Genet. 2008;40: 1185-1192.

43. Behar DM, Rosset S, Tzur S, et al. African ancestry allelic variation at the MYH9 gene contributes to increased susceptibility to non-diabetic endstage kidney disease in Hispanic Americans. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19: 1816-1827.

44. Nelson GW, Freedman BI, Bowden DW, et al. Dense mapping of MYH9 localizes the strongest kidney disease associations to the region of introns 13 to 15. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:1805-1815.

45. Genovese G, Friedman DJ, Ross MD, et al. Association of trypanolytic ApoL1 variants with kidney disease in African Americans. Science. 2010;329:841-845.

46. Perez-Morga D, Vanhollebeke B, Paturiaux-Hanocq F, et al. Apolipoprotein L-I promotes trypanosome lysis by forming pores in lysosomal membranes. Science. 2005;309:469-472.

47. Vanhamme L, Paturiaux-Hanocq F, Poelvoorde P, et al. Apolipoprotein L-I is the trypanosome lytic factor of human serum. Nature. 2003;422:83-87.

48. Cooper A, Ilboudo H, Alibu VP, et al. APOL1 renal risk variants have contrasting resistance and susceptibility associations with African trypanosomiasis. Elife. 2017;6. pii:e25461.

49. Kopp JB, Nelson GW, Sampath K, et al. APOL1 genetic variants in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and HIV-associated nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:2129-2137.

50. Limou S, Nelson GW, Kopp JB, et al. APOL1 kidney risk alleles: population genetics and disease associations. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2014;21:426-433.

51. Kasembeli AN, Duarte R, Ramsay M, et al. APOL1 risk variants are strongly associated with HIV-Associated nephropathy in Black South Africans. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:2882-2890.

52. Behar DM, Kedem E, Rosset S, et al. Absence of APOL1 risk variants protects against HIV-associated nephropathy in the Ethiopian population. Am J Nephrol. 2011;34:452-459.

53. Dummer PD, Limou S, Rosenberg AZ, et al. APOL1 Kidney Disease risk variants: an evolving landscape. Semin Nephrol. 2015;35:222-236.

54. Atta MG, Estrella MM, Kuperman M, et al. HIV-associated nephropathy patients with and without apolipoprotein L1 gene variants have similar clinical and pathological characteristics. Kidney Int. 2012;82:338-343.

55. Ko WY, Rajan P, Gomez F, et al. Identifying Darwinian selection acting on different human APOL1 variants among diverse African populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:54-66.

56. Atta MG, Estrella MM, Skorecki KL, et al. Association of APOL1 genotype with renal histology among Black HIV-positive patients undergoing kidney biopsy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:262-270.

57. Fine DM, Wasser WG, Estrella MM, et al. APOL1 risk variants predict histopathology and progression to ESRD in HIV-related kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:343-350.

58. Kopp JB, Winkler CA, Zhao X, et al. Clinical features and histology of apolipoprotein L1-associated nephropathy in the FSGS clinical trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:1443-1448.

59. Estrella MM, Li M, Tin A, et al. The association between APOL1 risk alleles and longitudinal kidney function differs by HIV viral suppression status. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:646-652.

60. Estrella MM, Wyatt CM, Pearce CL, et al. Host APOL1 genotype is independently associated with proteinuria in HIV infection. Kidney Int. 2013;84:834-840. 61. Beckerman P, Bi-Karchin J, Park AS, et al. Transgenic expression of

human APOL1 risk variants in podocytes induces kidney disease in mice. Nat Med. 2017;23:429-438.

62. Nichols B, Jog P, Lee JH, et al. Innate immunity pathways regulate the nephropathy gene Apolipoprotein L1. Kidney Int. 2015;87:332-342.

63. Fu X Zhu JX Richman A, et al. APOL1-G1 in nephrocytes induces hypertrophy and accelerates cell death. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28: 1106-1116.

64. Kruzel-Davila E, Shemer R, Ofir A, et al. APOL1-mediated cell injury involves disruption of conserved trafficking processes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:1117-1130.

65. Ma L, Chou JW, Snipes JA, et al. APOL1 renal-risk variants induce mitochondrial dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:1093-1105.

66. Olabisi OA, Zhang JX VerPlank L, et al. APOL1 kidney disease risk variants cause cytotoxicity by depleting cellular potassium and inducing stress-activated protein kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:830-837.

67. Bruggeman LA, Wu Z, Luo L, et al. APOL1-G0 or APOL1-G2 Transgenic Models Develop Preeclampsia but Not Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:3600-3610.

68. Wan G, Zhaorigetu S, Liu Z, et al. Apolipoprotein L1, a novel Bcl-2 homology domain 3-only lipid-binding protein, induces autophagic cell death. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:21540-21549.

69. Lan X, Jhaveri A, Cheng K, et al. APOL1 risk variants enhance podocyte necrosis through compromising lyso-somal membrane permeability. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014;307:F326-F336.

70. Atta MG, Gallant JE, Rahman MH, et al. Antiretroviral therapy in the treatment of HIV-associated nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:2809-2813.

71. Booth JW, Hamzah L, Jose S, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of HIV-associated immune complex kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31:2099-2107.

72. Foy MC, Estrella MM, Lucas GM, et al. Comparison of risk factors and outcomes in HIV immune complex kidney disease and HIV-associated nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1524-1532.

73. Ibrahim F, Naftalin C, Cheserem E, et al. Immunodeficiency and renal impairment are risk factors for HIV-associated acute renal failure. AIDS. 2010;24:2239-2244.

74. Mocroft A, Lundgren JD, Ross M, et al. Development and validation of a risk score for chronic kidney disease in HIV infection using prospective cohort data from the D:A:D study. PLoS Med. 2015;12: e1001809.

75. Scherzer R, Gandhi M, Estrella MM, et al. A chronic kidney disease risk score to determine tenofovir safety in a prospective cohort of HIVpositive male veterans. AIDS. 2014;28:1289-1295.

76. Woodward CL, Hall AM, Williams IG, et al. Tenofovir-associated renal and bone toxicity. HIV Med. 2009;10:482-487.

77. Hamzah L, Jose S, Booth JW, et al. Treatment-limiting renal tubulopathy in patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. J Infect. 2017;74: 492-500.

78. Mocroft A, Lundgren JD, Ross M, et al. Cumulative and current exposure to potentially nephrotoxic antiretrovirals and development of chronic kidney disease in HIV-positive individuals with a normal baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate: a prospective international cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2016;3:e23-e32.

79. Scherzer R, Estrella M, Li X et al. Association of tenofovir exposure with kidney disease risk in HIV infection. AIDS. 2012;26:867-875.

80. Jose S, Hamzah L, Campbell LJ, et al. Incomplete reversibility of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:363-373.

81. Post FA, Tebas P, Clarke A, et al. Brief report: switching to tenofovir alafenamide, coformulated with elvitegravir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine, in HIV-Infected adults with renal impairment: 96-week results from a single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase 3 study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74:180-184.

82. Ryom L, Mocroft A, Kirk O, et al. Predictors of estimated glomerular filtration rate progression, stabilization or improvement after chronic renal impairment in HIV-positive individuals. AIDS. 2017;31:1261-1270.

83. Waheed S, Attia D, Estrella MM, et al. Proximal tubular dysfunction and kidney injury associated with tenofovir in HIV patients: a case series. Clin Kidney J. 2015;8:420-425.

84. Hamzah L, Booth JW, Jose S, et al. Renal tubular disease in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2015;29:1831-1836.

85. Chughlay MF, Njuguna C, Cohen K, et al. Acute interstitial nephritis caused by lopinavir/ritonavir in a surgeon receiving antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis. AIDS. 2015;29:503-504.

86. Doco-Lecompte T, Garrec A, Thomas L, et al. Lopinavir-ritonavir (Kaletra) and lithiasis: seven cases. AIDS. 2004;18:705-706.

87. HamadaX Nishijima T, Watanabe K, et al. High incidence of renal stones among HIV-infected patients on ritonavir-boosted ata-zanavir than in those receiving other protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1262-1269.

88. Schmid S, Opravil M, Moddel M, et al. Acute interstitial nephritis of HIV positive patients under atazanavir and tenofovir therapy in a retrospective analysis of kidney biopsies. Virchows Arch. 2007;450: 665-670.

89. Shafi T, Choi MJ, Racusen LC, et al. Ritonavir-induced acute kidney injury: kidney biopsy findings and review of literature. Clin Nephrol. 2011;75(Suppl 1):60-64.

90. Jose S, Nelson M, Phillips A, et al. Improved kidney function in patients who switch their protease inhibitor from atazanavir or lopinavir to darunavir. AIDS. 2017;31:485-492.

91. Cahn P, Andrade-Villanueva J, Arribas JR, et al. Dual therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus lamivudine versus triple therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in antiretroviral-therapy-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results of the randomised, open label, non-inferiority GARDEL trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:572-580.

92. Perez-Molina JA, Rubio R, Rivero A, et al. Dual treatment with atazanavir-ritonavir plus lamivudine versus triple treatment with atazanavir-ritonavir plus two nucleos(t)ides in virologi-cally stable patients with HIV-1 (SALT): 48 week results from a randomised, openlabel, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:775-784.

93. Raffi F, Babiker AG, Richert L, et al. Ritonavir-boosted darunavir combined with raltegravir or tenofovir-emtricitabine in antiretroviralnaive adults infected with HIV-1: 96 week results from the NEAT001/ ANRS143 randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;384: 1942-1951.

94. Abraham AG, Althoff KN, Jing X et al. End-stage renal

disease among HIV-infected adults in North America. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:941-949.

95. Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, et al. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet. 2013;382:260-272.

96. Wong C, Gange SJ, Buchacz K, et al. First occurrence of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension among North American HIVinfected adults, 2000-2013. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:459-467.

97. Lucas GM, Jing X Sulkowski M, et al. Hepatitis C viremia and the risk of chronic kidney disease in HIV-infected individuals. J Infect Dis. 2013;208: 1240-1249.

98. Mocroft A, Neuhaus J, Peters L, et al. Hepatitis B and C co-infection are independent predictors of progressive kidney disease in HIV-positive, antiretroviral-treated adults. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40245.

99. Jha V, Prasad N. CKD and infectious diseases in Asia Pacific: challenges and opportunities. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68:148-160.

100. Shen TC, Huang KY, Chao CH, et al. The risk of chronic kidney disease in tuberculosis: a population-based cohort study. QJM. 2015;108:397-403.

101. Wen YK, Chen ML. Crescentic glomerulonephritis associated with miliary tuberculosis. Clin Nephrol. 2009;71:310-313.

102. Choi AI, Li Y Parikh C, et al. Long-term clinical consequences of acute kidney injury in the HIV-infected. Kidney Int. 2010;78:478-485.

103. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3: 1-150.

104. Choi A, Scherzer R, Bacchetti P, et al. Cystatin C, albuminuria, and 5-year all-cause mortality in HIV-infected persons. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56: 872-882.

105. Shlipak MG, Matsushita K, Arnlov J, et al. Cystatin C versus creatinine in determining risk based on kidney function. N Engl J Med. 2013;369: 932-943.

106. Inker LA, Wyatt C, Creamer R, et al. Performance of creatinine and cystatin C GFR estimating equations in an HIVpositive population on antiretrovirals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61:302-309.

107. Lucas GM, Cozzi-Lepri A, Wyatt CM, et al. Glomerular filtration rate estimated using creatinine, cystatin C or both markers and the risk of clinical events in HIV-infected individuals. HIV Med. 2014;15: 116-123.

108. Seape T, Gounden V, van Deventer HE, et al. Cystatin C- and creatininebased equations in the assessment of renal function in HIV-positive patients prior to commencing highly active antiretroviral therapy. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016;53:58-66.

109. Yombi JC, Pozniak A, Boffito M, et al. Antiretrovirals and the kidney in current clinical practice: renal pharmacokinetics, alterations of renal function and renal toxicity. AIDS. 2014;28:621-632.

110. Knight EL, Verhave JC, Spiegelman D, et al. Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement. Kidney Int. 2004;65:1416-1421.

111. Stevens LA, Levey AS. Measurement of kidney function. Med Clin North Am. 2005;89:457-473.

112. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, et al. Factors other than glomerular filtration rate affect serum cystatin C levels. Kidney Int. 2009;75:652-660.

113. Yombi JC, Jones R, Pozniak A, et al. Monitoring of kidney function in HIV-positive patients. HIV Med. 2015;16:457-467.

114. Yahaya I, Uthman AO, Uthman MM. Interventions for HIV-associated nephropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD007183.

115. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations. Geneva, Switzerland; 2014.

116. Kidney Disease: Impproving global Outcomes (KDIGO) Blood Pressure Working Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines

for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Intl Suppl. 2012;2: 337-414.

117. Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, et al. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103-2116.

118. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the prevention, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection. Geneva, Switzerland; 2015.

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

119. Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N, et al. Executive Summary: Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/ Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63: 853-867.

120. Pol S, Jadoul M, Vallet-Pichard A. An update on the management of hepatitis C virus-infected patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease while awaiting the revised KDIGO Guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32:32-35.

121. Terrault NA, Bzowej NH, Chang KM, et al. AASLD guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2016;63:261-283.

122. Ahuja TS, Grady J, Khan S. Changing trends in the survival of dialysis patients with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:1889-1893.

123. Ahuja TS, Collinge N, Grady J, et al. Is dialysis modality a factor in survival of patients with ESRD and HIV-associated nephropathy? Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:1060-1064.

124. Soleymanian T, Raman S, Shannaq FN, et al. Survival and morbidity of HIV patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: one center's experience and review of the literature. Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38: 331-338.

125. Mitchell D, Krishnasami Z,Young CJ, et al. Arteriovenous access outcomes in haemodialysis patients with HIV infection. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:465-470.

126. Wreghitt TG. Blood-borne virus infections in dialysis units-a review. Rev Med Virol. 1999;9:101-109.

127. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current trends recommendations for providing dialysis treatment to patients infected with human T-lymphotropic virus type III/lymph-adenopathy-associated virus. MMWR. 1986;35:376-378, 383.

128. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing infections in dialysis setting guideline. Available at: https:// www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/dialysis/index.html. Accessed July 19, 2017.

129. Ndlovu KC, Sibanda W, Assounga A. Peritonitis outcomes in patients with HIV and end-stage renal failure on peritoneal dialysis: a prospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:48.

130. Farzadegan H, Ford D, Malan M, et al. HIV-1 survival kinetics in peritoneal dialysis effluent. Kidney Int. 1996;50:1659-1662.

131. Ndlovu KC, Sibanda W, Assounga A. Detection of human immunodeficiency virus-1 ribonucleic acid in the peritoneal effluent of renal failure patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32:714-721.

132. Stock PG, Barin B, Murphy B, et al. Outcomes of kidney transplantation in HIV-infected recipients. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2004-2014.

133. Locke JE, Gustafson S, Mehta S, et al. Survival benefit of kidney transplantation in HIV-infected patients. Ann Surg. 2017;265:604-608.

134. Gathogo EN, Hamzah L, Hilton R, et al. Kidney transplantation in HIV-positive adults: the UK experience. Int J STD AIDS. 2014;25:57-66.

135. Gathogo EN, Shah S, Post FA. Kidney transplant outcomes in HIV serodiscordant recipient pairs. AIDS. 2017;31:1199-1201.

136. Locke JE, Mehta S, Sawinski D, et al. Access to kidney transplantation among HIV-infected waitlist candidates. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12: 467-475.

137. Muller E, Barday Z, Mendelson M, et al. HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive kidney transplantation-results at 3 to 5 years. N Engl J Med. 2015;372: 613-620.

138. Waheed S, Sakr A, Chheda ND, et al. Outcomes of re-

nal transplantation in HIV-1 associated nephropathy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129702.

139. McLean FE, Gathogo E, Goodall D, et al. Alemtuzumab induction therapy in HIV-positive renal transplant recipients. AIDS. 2017;31:1047-1048.

140. Gathogo E, Harber M, Bhagani S, et al. Impact of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin on the incidence of acute allograft rejection in human immunodeficiency virus-positive kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2016;100:871-878.

141. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67:370-398.

142. Karuthu S, Blumberg EA. Common infections in kidney transplant recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:2058-2070.

143. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2008;109:S1-S99.

144. Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatology. 2009;50:661-662.

145. Sawinski D, Shelton BA, Mehta S, et al. Impact of protease inhibitor based anti-retroviral therapy on outcomes for HIVio kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:3114-3122.

146. Canaud G, Dejucq-Rainsford N, Avettand-Fenoel V, et al. The kidney as a reservoir for HIV-1 after renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:407-419.

147. APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Network (APOLLO) Clinical Centers (Collaborative U01), RFA-DK-16-025. In: Department of Health and Human Services N, ed. Available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/ RFA-DK-16-025.html. Accessed June 19, 2017.

148. Muller E, Barday Z, Kahn D. HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2070-2071.

149. Muller E, Kahn D, Mendelson M. Renal transplantation between HIV-positive donors and recipients. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2336-2337.

150. Organ procurement and transplantation: implementation of the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2015;80:26464-26467.

151. Boyarsky BJ, Segev DL. From bench to bill: how a transplant nuance became 1 of only 57 laws passed in 2013. Ann Surg. 2016;263:430-433.

152. Papeta N, Kiryluk K, Patel A, et al. APOL1 variants increase risk for FSGS and HIVAN but not IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22: 1991-1996.

153. Purswani MU, Patel K, Winkler CA, et al. Brief report: APOL1 renal risk variants are associated with chronic kidney disease in children and youth with perinatal HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73:63-68.

154. Sax PE, Wohl D, Yin MT, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, coformulated with elvitegravir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: two randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet. 2015;385: 2606-2615.

155. Abboud O, Becker G, Bellorin-Font E, et al. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines on hepatitis C in chronic kidney disease acknowledged by ISN. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2008;4:648-649.

156. Mendizabal M, Reddy KR. Chronic hepatitis C and chronic kidney disease: Advances, limitations and unchartered territories. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24:442-453.

157. Pockros PJ, Reddy KR, Mantry PS, et al. Efficacy of Direct-Acting Antiviral Combination for Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection and Severe Renal Impairment or End-

Stage Renal Disease. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1590-1598.

158. Roth D, Nelson DR, Bruchfeld A, et al. Grazoprevir plus elbasvir in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (the C-SURFER study): a combination phase 3 study. Lancet. 2015;386: 1537-1545.

159. Bhamidimarri KR, Czul F, Peyton A, et al. Safety, efficacy and tolerability of half-dose sofosbuvir plus simeprevir in treatment of Hepatitis C in patients with end stage renal disease. J Hepatol. 2015;63:763-765.

160. Dumortier J, Bailly F, Pageaux GP, et al. Sofosbuvir-based antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus patients with severe renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32:2065-2071.

161. Saxena V, Koraishy FM, Sise ME, et al. Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir containing regimens in hepatitis C-infected patients with impaired renal function. Liver Int. 2016;36:807-816.

162. Kim PS, Woods C, Georgoff P, et al. A1C underestimates glycemia in HIV infection. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1591-1593.

163. Slama L, Palella FJ Jr, Abraham AG, et al. Inaccuracy of haemoglobin A1c among HIV-infected men: effects of CD4 cell count, antiretroviral therapies and haematological parameters. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:3360-3367.

164. Gane E, Lawitz E, Pugatch D, et al. Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir in patients with HCV and severe renal impairment. N Engl J Med. 2017;377: 1448-1455.

165. AASLD/IDSA. HCV guidance: recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C. Patients with renal impairment. Available at: https://www.hcvguidelines.org/unique-populations/renal-impairment.

Accessed December 20, 2017.

APPENDIX

Other Conference Participants

Ali K. Abu-Alfa, Lebanon; Dwomoa Adu, Ghana; Lawrence Y. Agodoa, USA; Charles E. Alpers, USA; Fatiu A. Aro-gundade, Nigeria; Gloria Ashuntantang, Cameroon; Corinne l. Bagnis, France; Raj Bhimma,

South Africa; Isabelle Brocheriou, France; Arthur H. Cohen, USA; Karen Cohen, South Africa; H. Terence Cook, UK; Sophie de Seigneux, Switzerland; June Fabian, South Africa; Fredric O. Finkelstein, USA; Mark Haas, USA; Lisa Ham-zah, UK; Bruce M. Hendry, UK; Valentine |monje, Kenya; J. Charles Jennette, USA; Paul L. Kimmel, USA; Mary E. Klot-man, USA; Paul E. Klotman, USA; Chris P. Larsen, USA; Mignon l. McCulloch, South Africa; Pulane Mosiane, South Africa; Cynthia C. Nast, USA; lkechi G. Okpechi, South Africa; Patricio E. Ray, USA; Avi Z. Rosenberg, USA; Michael J. Ross, USA; Lene Ryom, Denmarlc Luan Truong, USA; lfeoma Ulasi, Nigeria; Liffert Vogt, The Netherlands; Martin Zeier, Germany.

Поступила в редакцию: 02.11.2018 Принята в печать: 14.11.2018 Article received: 02.11.2018 Accepted for publication: 14.11.2018

KIDNEY DISEASE IN THE SETTING OF HIV INFECTION: CONCLUSIONS FROM A KIDNEY DISEASE: IMPROVING GLOBAL OUTCOMES (KDIGO) CONTROVERSIES CONFERENCE Текст научной статьи по специальности «Фундаментальная медицина»

Аннотация научной статьи по фундаментальной медицине, автор научной работы — Swanepoel Charles R., Atta Mohamed G., D'Agati Vivette D., Estrella Michelle M., Fogo Agnes B.

Похожие темы научных работ по фундаментальной медицине , автор научной работы — Swanepoel Charles R., Atta Mohamed G., D'Agati Vivette D., Estrella Michelle M., Fogo Agnes B.

ВИЧ-ассоциированная болезнь почек: итоги согласительной конференции KDIGO

Текст научной работы на тему «KIDNEY DISEASE IN THE SETTING OF HIV INFECTION: CONCLUSIONS FROM A KIDNEY DISEASE: IMPROVING GLOBAL OUTCOMES (KDIGO) CONTROVERSIES CONFERENCE»