CC BY
9CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES (CARJIS) ilmiy jurnali bilan hamkorlikda.
ISSUES OF REGIONAL INTEGRATION IN THE UNIVERSALIZATION OF CULTURES Abdullayeva Nasiba Ibrahimjon qizi
Uzbek State Institute of Arts and Culture Faculty of Folk Art "Socio-cultural activity" 3rd year student majoring in Education Arjumandbegim9646@gmail.com
ANNOTATSIYA
Ushbu maqolada Integratsiya va xalqaro hamkorlikning farqli jihatlari, madaniyatlararo universallashuvda xalqaro hamkorlikning bugungi kun uchun dolzarblik ahamiyati haqida yozilgan.
Kalit so'zlar: Integratsiya, modernizatsiya, Birlashgan millatlar tashkiloti, universallashuv, realistlar va hukumatlararo siyosatparastlar, natija.
Аннотация: В данной статье рассматриваются различные аспекты интеграции и международного сотрудничества, значение международного сотрудничества в межкультурной универсализации на сегодняшний день.
Ключевые слова: интеграция, модернизация, ООН, универсализация, реалисты и межгосударственные политики, результат.
Abstract: This article deals with the different aspects of integration and international cooperation, the importance of international cooperation in intercultural universalization today.
Key words: Integration, modernization, the United Nations, universalization, realists and intergovernmental politicians, result.
The success of EU integration in the second half of the last century not only linked scientific and ideological perspectives on integration with practical experience, but also provided a number of new perspectives on integration theory.
In this regard, the basic definitions of "integration - the process of voluntary unification, interaction of national economies in order to obtain qualitatively new conditions and expand the opportunities for development of the country" not in sync until.
In the lexical sense, the legal interpretation of the term, which means "the result of a process or action that produces a whole, uniting, uniting, joining into a whole," is much more complex and differs from that of political science and philosophy. In particular, the definition of "interstate political integration - the process of establishing new institutions that assimilate the sovereign rights of national political bodies" can be found only in political dictionaries.
CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES (CARJIS) ilmiy jurnali bilan hamkorlikda.
There are different approaches to this term in the field of international law. In the second half of the twentieth century, as a result of the intensification of international relations, interstate borders were recognized only as an instrument of legal security of states, and at a time when economic development began to be hampered, diversity of approaches may have emerged.
When it comes to cross-border relations, it is clear that integration is linked to regional criteria. This is one of the main signs of regional integration.
At this point, the concept of "region" itself needs to be clarified. In describing it, most scholars rely on three criteria put forward by Bruce Rasset. These are geographical proximity and individuality, interdependence and commonality. Geographical proximity seems to have lost some of its importance in recent years due to the development of science and technology in the development of transport links. YA, small mountains and rivers are no longer able to define the boundaries of any region. However, this factor did not significantly affect the political and cultural boundaries within the region. The thin "Berlin Wall" that until recently separated the two political systems is a clear proof of this. Interdependence is often referred to as economic interdependence. The internal and external trade and economic relations of the countries of the region: the movement of raw materials, goods, technologies and labor from one side to another are the main indicators that determine the degree of interdependence.
The third criterion that defines a region as a region is the commonality of the region. Commonality can be linguistic, religious, ethnic, historical. It can also be reflected in the way of life of nations, in the political system of countries, in the levels of economic development. Only the historical circumstances of a particular period can determine which of them is primary. These criteria, which define the region, are currently the main factors of regional integration. However, many scientific sources do not focus on regional integration, but on the process of integrated regionalization. This analysis is also reasonable: it is only natural that any integration should take root between two or more states and gradually cover or regionalize the entire region. It is better to look at the process of regional integration only as a process that has already reached a partial regional scale. In this sense, it is necessary to distinguish between the concepts of integrated regionalization and regional integration.
The second key aspect of integration is its economic nature. There is no example of "political integration" in any part of the world. Political unification or interstate integration is still a level of cooperation (even within the European Union). Therefore, the following is an idea of economic regionalization (or economic regionalism), which can grow to the level of regional integration. Economic regionalization, which has not yet reached the level of integration, usually remains within the framework of international economic cooperation. Cooperation regionalism serves to stimulate
CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES (CARJIS) ilmiy jurnali bilan hamkorlikda. production and trade between states without compromising their sovereignty. An example is the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), founded in 967 and uniting countries such as China and Japan. Although plans to establish a free trade area within the organization have not been implemented, significant institutional progress has been made in monitoring the implementation of agreements by the early 1990s.
In contrast, integrated regionalism primarily reflects the essence of economic federalism and creates a single internal market in the relevant space. The single domestic market, in turn, requires a legal and political combination that allows for the free movement of production and goods, individuals, services and capital. Such harmonization will be achieved as a result of the transfer of some of their powers to the Economic Integration Authority. In short, collaborative regionalism is fundamentally different from integrated regionalism. Regardless of the level of regionalization, it is really about the difference between the concepts of cooperation and integration. Collaboration is the joint action and practice of several entities based on a common consensus on a specific common goal and ways to achieve it, as opposed to operating separately on the basis of competition rules.
Integration, unlike international cooperation, is a legal event that has clear legal consequences and is guaranteed on the condition of unification of legal norms that are binding on all. The unification of legal norms and through them the whole legal system is achieved through the harmonization of national legislation.
Unless the distinction between integration and cooperation is understood, the complex nature of any integration will remain obscure. So, first of all, we need to know the difference between integration and cooperation.
First, cooperation can be between countries anywhere in the world. Integration requires territorial proximity, proximity, or regional integrity.
Second, cooperation can be established in all spheres of economic and sociopolitical life, and integration is mainly in the economic sphere.
Third, cooperation will only lead to the liberalization of foreign economic and trade relations between states, and without deep economic structural changes. In other words, the previous economic institutions will remain in place. Integration, on the other hand, focuses on the creation of new economic institutions and integrated economic zones.
Fourth, although cooperation leads to the strengthening and deepening of interstate economic, socio-political and cultural ties, there is no need for a separate administrative apparatus. The integration process requires the establishment of common bodies that enact, enforce and oversee laws that are binding on all.
Finally, fifthly, cooperation does not seriously interfere with the absolute sovereignty of states, is carried out through mutual concessions and is governed by the simplest legal mechanisms. In integration, most of the sovereign rights of states are
CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES (CARJIS) ilmiy jurnali bilan hamkorlikda. transferred to a third party (an organization, not another state). The division of powers between central governments, between member states, between member states and general institutions creates a complex legal framework.
In short, cooperation is more about common interests, and integration is about matching goals. Deep and mutually trusting cooperation between countries opens the way to a new social phenomenon - integration, which is a qualitatively high stage of cooperation. The coherence and interdependence of the process of international cooperation and integration sometimes makes it difficult to distinguish between the two. While some sources see integration as a form of collaboration, it is sometimes approached from an institutional perspective. For example, "integration, which is the fruit of modern civilizational development, is one of the manifestations of cooperation between states today. It means the existence of superior institutional systems that ensure the smooth development of the participating states, as well as the viability of intergovernmental organizations in the interests of their participants. " In such cases, the most important legal distinction between cooperation and integration is the legal distinction. In this regard, it is better to refer to the definition given by the German lawyer Gilbert Gornig: "Integration means the creation of general institutions that restrict national parliaments and issue secondary legal acts that are binding not only on participating states but also on every citizen." No matter how many different definitions of integration, there are some things that make them common. This means that any integration will require territorial integrity or proximity, binding and unified legal rules that are binding on all, and an institutional system that enforces and monitors these rules. Not all of these requirements may arise at once. It depends on the stage or form of integration.
The integration process in the Central Asian region is also progressing slowly. On January 0, 1999, the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Republic of Kazakhstan signed an agreement on the establishment of a free economic zone. On April 0, 1999, an agreement was signed between Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan on the establishment of a free economic zone. As a result of Tajikistan's accession to the treaty in March 998, the Central Asian Economic Community was established on July 7, 998. On February 8, 00, the community was transformed into the Central Asian Cooperation Organization (CACO). At the Dushanbe summit of the organization in October 00, Russia was accepted as an equal member of the OIC.
Within the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), a Customs Union was established in January 996 between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, which was later joined by Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. On its basis, the Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC) was established on October 0, 000, and a year later, the creation of a free economic space within this community began.
CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES (CARJIS) ilmiy jurnali bilan hamkorlikda.
LIST OF REFERENCES:
1. K.Nishonbaeva "Interethnic and universal problems of culture". Innovation-Ziyo Publishing House. Tashkent 2020
2. Annotated dictionary of the Uzbek language. State Scientific Publishing House Tashkent 2000
3. www.ziyo.net
4. www.saviya.uz
5. Pavel Annekov: "Million dollar mistakes." Asahiy. Factor Book Publishing House. Tashkent. 2021
6. Saloydinov, S. Q. (2021). Paxta tozalash zavodlarida energiya sarfini kamaytirishning texnik-iqtisodiy mexanizmini yaratish. "Academic research in educational sciences", 2(9), 886-889. https://doi.org/10.24412/2181-1385-2021-9-886-889
7. Saloydinov, S. Q. (2021). Creation of feasibility studies to reduce energy costs in ginneries. "Экономика и социум", 9(88), 147-149.
8. Салойдинов, C. К. (2021). Образовательные кредиты в Узбекистане. "Экономика и социум", 12(91), 470-472.
9. Салойдинов, C. К. (2021). Спрос на рынке дифференцированных продуктов. "Экономика и социум", 12(91), 473-476.
10. Салойдинов, С. К. (2022). С паровой турбиной 471 МВт на Талимарджанской ТЭЦ расчет электрических режимов при максимальной зимней нагрузке. "Central Asian Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (CARJIS)", Special issue, 116-121.
11. Салойдинов, С. К. (2022). ИННОВАЦИОННОЕ РЕШЕНИЕ ДЛЯ ПOЛYЧЕНИЯ БИОГАЗА. "Central Asian Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (CARJIS)", 2(3), 280-285. https://doi.org/10.24412/2181 -2454-2022-3-280285
12. Dadaboyev, Q. Q. (2021). REFRIGERATOR IN MODERN HEATING POWER STATIONSTECHNICAL WATER WASTE THROUGH RECONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWERREDUCTION. "International journal of philosophical studies and social sciences", 1(3), 96-101.
13. Dadaboyev, Q. Q. (2022). ISSIQLIK ELEKTR STANSIYALARIDA TEXNIK SUV ISROFINI BARATARAF ETISH. "Academic research in educational sciences", 3(1), 434-440. https://doi.org/10.24412/2181-2454-2022-1-41-47
14. Dadaboyev, Q. Q. (2022). BUG'-GAZ QURILMASI GRADIRNIYALARIDAGI AYLANMA SUV ISROFINI KAMAYTIRISH "Central Asian Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies (CARJIS)", Special issue, 15-21
