CC BY
9Естественно-тучные основы физического воспитания и спортивной тренировки
Natural Science Basics of Physical Education and Sports Training
UDC 159.944.4:796.853.23
DOI: 10.25688/2076-9091.2023.51.3.05
Murat Atasoy1, Unal Turk^apar2, Kamil Polat3
2 Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University,
Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic 1 3 Ahi Evran University, Kirchehir, Turkey
Investigating stress levels and stress coping strategies in judo athletes1
Abstract. This study seeks to determine how stress coping strategies of judo athletes are shaped by the sport they practice. The study uses the screening method and is descriptive and deductive in nature. The study was carried out in 2022 and involved 134 competing judo athletes based in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, who volunteered to participate. To collect empirical data, the authors used a demographic information form and the 'Inventory of strategies for coping with stress in sports's cale. The collected data were processed with SPSS 25.0 statistical software. Other procedures included the Student's Z-test for pairwise comparisonsu-sing the collected data, the ANOVA test for multiple pairwise comparisons, and the Tukey's multiple comparison test for deciphering significant differences between the groups.
Regarding the gender variable, there was a significant difference between male and female athletes in how high they scored on the subscales of mental imagery, venting
1 Статья публикуется в авторской редакции.
© Atasoy M., Tûrkçapar Ü., Polat K., 2023
of unpleasant emotions, and mental distraction. On average, male athletesscored higher than women on the logical analysis and disengagement subscales depending on their athlete level and their status of (not) being a member of the national team. There were also significant differences in the participants' scores on: the subscales of support seeking, logical analysis and disengagement depending on their competitive level; the subscales of thought control, mental imagery, effort expenditure and support seeking depending on the age variable; the subscale of mental imagerydepending on the competitive experience variable.
Keywords: judo, stress in sports, stress coping, coping strategies
УДК 159.944.4:796.853.23
DOI: 10.25688/2076-9091.2023.51.3.05
Мурат Атасой1, Унал Туркчапар2, Камил Полат3
2
1, 3
Кыргызско-Турецкий университет «Манас», г. Бишкек, Кыргызстан Университет Ахи Эвран, г. Кирчехир, Турция
Изучение уровней стресса и стратегий его преодоления у спортсменов в дзюдо
Аннотация. В статье приведено исследование, направленное на определение того, как стратегии борьбы со стрессом у дзюдоистов определяются видом спорта, которым они занимаются. В исследовании используется метод скрининга, который носит описательный и дедуктивный характер. Исследование проводилось в 2022 году. В нем принимали участие 134 действующих дзюдоистов, базирующихся в г. Бишкеке (Кыргызстан). Для сбора эмпирических данных авторы использовали форму демографической информации и Перечень стратегий для борьбы со стрессом в спортивных масштабах. Собранные данные обрабатывали с помощью статистического программного обеспечения SPSS 25.0. Другие процедуры включали г-тест Стьюдента для парного сравнения с использованием собранных данных, тест ANOVA для множественных парных сравнений и тест Тьюки для множественного сравнения и расшифровки существенных различий между группами.
Что касается гендерной переменной, то между спортсменами-мужчинами и спортсменами-женщинами была существенная разница в том, насколько высоко они оценивали подшкалы умственной образности, выход неприятных эмоций и умственного отвлечения. В среднем мужчины набирали более высокие, чем женщины, подшкалы логического анализа и разделения в зависимости от их спортивного уровня и статуса (не) члена сборной. Были также значительные различия в оценках участников по: под-шкалам поиска поддержки, логическому анализу и разделению в зависимости от их конкурентного уровня; подшкалам контроля мышления, умственных образов, затрат усилий и поиска поддержки в зависимости от возрастной переменной; масштабу умственного образа, зависящему от переменной конкурентного опыта.
Ключевые слова: дзюдо, стресс в спорте, преодоление стресса, копинг-стратегии
Introduction
Due to the developments in sports and the increase of sports in the world, expectations from athletes are increasing day by day, competition conditions are becoming more difficult every day, and while some athletes quit sports in the face of difficulties, some continue to struggle despite all difficulties.
Since we can encounter stress at any time in our daily life, it has become an indispensable fact in terms of our daily life. As a result of being faced with stress at any moment in daily life, stress has become one of the frequently used words in everyday language. Although many different definitions have been made for the concept of stress when looking at the literature, it has continued to exist since the early ages when viewed from a historical point of view due to the fact that stress finds its place in daily life, and it has been the subject of many scientific studies from the past to the present [11; 18; 19].
Stress is a condition that disrupts a person's harmony for a short or long time. Internal and external factors affect the cerebral cortex, limbic system, thalamus, hypothalamus, pituitary, autonomic system, glandula suprarenalis [3].
As a result of long-term exposure to a stressful life, stress causes psychological and physiological effects on individuals. These effects cause disorders such as cardiovascular diseases, respiratory system diseases, digestive system diseases, depression, obesity, drug addiction and sleep disorders, which are often observed especially in modern societies [14].
Stress is a condition that occurs when the physical and spiritual boundaries of the organism are threatened and challenged. It has the ability to activate a chain of reactions aimed at protecting the living self in the face of threats and difficulties. This feature is the emergence of the so-called "fight or flight" response when faced with danger. Faced with a danger, a creature tries to get away from this danger that it believes it cannot cope with, fights the danger that it believes it can cope with, and thus adapts to the new situation [4].
Stress is a physical reaction that is not like any emotional state felt in situations of distress or difficulties used in daily life, but is created to adapt to new situations and conditions. In cases where the factors that endanger the integrity of the body, push tension or cause stress cannot be dealt with, emotions such as fear, anxiety, hopelessness, helplessness accompany stress. These are the psychic changes that occur in the organism in response to stress [6].
Stress is one of the most important factors in the emergence of negative health conditions of individuals, and studies in the literature indicate that stress negatively affects physical and mental health. In the studies conducted, it is stated that stress negatively affects human health. Because of this, it can be likened to a button that the intense stress that occurs in the face of situations experienced negatively activates the individual's physical and mental health.
The phenomenon of stress causes motivated emotional states to move above normal. In case of stress, people have to perceive a threat because a certain threat
is obvious. The factors that cause stress are defined as "stressors". Some stressors can be meaningful or important for people. Whether stressors are meaningful or positive depends on the individual's family life and the environment in which he lives. The factors that lead to stress are listed in the form of stimuli caused by the internal and external environment that change the individual's capacity to adapt. In addition, stressors consist of demands from the individual himself or from the environment [2]. Stress is a significant health problem that negatively affects the living standards of individuals, mentally limits their abilities in business life, and affects a person's emotional controls in a way that shakes them when exposed for a long time, causing healthy individuals to face a wide variety of problems in their lives [10].
There are various information available in the literature that the optimal level of stress positively affects the performance of individuals, but if it exceeds the optimal level, it will be anxiety, anxiety and uncontrolled. It is thought that the results of the findings that will be revealed by comparing the perceived stress levels of university students who play active sports with demographic variables will contribute to the literature in terms of determining what the sources of the stress they experience are or are not.
In this direction, the aim of the study is to examine the stress coping levels of individuals who practice judo sports in sports.
Material and method
The Research Model
The research is descriptive in nature and the levels of coping with stress in sports of individuals who practice judo sports have been examined.
In this study, the model of the research was created by considering the "screening model". Screening models are research models that aim to describe a situation that existed in the past or at the moment as it is. The event, person or object that is the subject of the research is tried to be conveyed within its own conditions and as it is. There is no purpose to change or influence these conditions in any way [16].
Working Group
A total of 134 participants consisting of 104 men and 30 women who played judo sports in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan in 2022 constitute the working group of this research.
Collection of Data and the Tools Used
The data was obtained through Google Forms. 2 different data collection tools were used in the research.
Diagnostic Information Form
The "Personal Information Form" developed by the researcher was used to determine the demographic characteristics of the university students participating in the study. This form; gender, age, sports age, sports level and are you a member of the national team? it consists of questions.
Inventory of Strategies for Coping with Stress in Sports
Stress Coping Strategies Inventory in Sports — SSBÇSE (ISCCSI "Inven-tairedes Stratégies de Copingen Compétition Sportive): The scale developed by Gaudreau and Blondin in Canada" was developed to evaluate the coping strategies used by athletes during competition. It consists of a total of 10 subproblems, and one of the subproblems has 3 items, and 9 of them have 4 "er items. Subproblems; thought control has been called imagining, relaxation, making an effort, mental analysis, seeking support, expressing unpleasant emotions, mental Deconfliction, withdrawal and social withdrawal.
Thought control is a cognitive activity that helps to reconstruct thoughts in highlighting the positive aspects of an individual's self and stressful sports environments in the past, present and future.
Imagining is a cognitive activity used to mentally practice or repeat mental states, techniques and tactics associated with stressful sports situations in the past, present and future.
Relaxation is a behavioral activity used to reduce the level of physiological, muscular and mental tension. Making an effort; activating the physical and mental resources used to take action against stressful situations encountered in the sports environment are behavioral activities.
Mental analysis is a cognitive activity used to evaluate or determine internal and external factors associated with stressful events encountered in the past in the sports environment, which may be encountered in the present and in the future.
Support seeking is a behavioral activity used to provide advice, feedback, emotional support. Dec. The expression of unpleasant emotions is to express and explain unpleasant emotional tensions experienced in stressful sports environments.
Mental disorder is a cognitive and behavioral activity used to voluntarily focus on things that are not related to sports performance.
Withdrawal is a cognitive and behavioral activity used to avoid making the movements necessary to achieve performance goals.
Social withdrawal is a behavioral activity used to instantly reduce or eliminate social relationships.
The 10 subscales of the scale are classified under three dimensions: (1) Task-oriented coping (imagining, making an effort, thought control, seeking support, relaxation, mental analysis), (2) Coping to divert attention (withdrawal and mental confusion), and (3) Withdrawal-oriented coping (expression of unpleasant emotions and social withdrawal). The scale is divided into three sub-scales: (1) Task-oriented coping (imagining, making an effort, thought control, support, relaxation, mental analysis), (2) Withdrawal-oriented coping (withdrawal and mental Deconfliction), (3) Withdrawal-oriented coping (expression of unpleasant emotions and social withdrawal), (3) Withdrawal-oriented coping, (3) Withdrawal-oriented coping, (3) Withdrawal-oriented coping, (3) Withdrawal-oriented coping.
At the completion of the scale, athletes are asked to indicate how much they used or thought about the situations mentioned in each item during the match. The coping methods used by athletes in sports are evaluated with a 5" likert-type scale in the form of not fitting at all (1), sleeping a little (2), sleeping occasionally (3), sleeping (4) and completely sleeping (5). Dec.
The scoring of the scale is done by collecting the items that make up the 10 sub-scales. There is no inverse matter in the scale. A high score indicates that the athlete prefers that coping strategy more or more often in coping with stressful situations. Low scores, on the other hand, indicate that this strategy is used less or not at all in coping with stress.
Analysis of the Data
Data analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistical 25 program. Percentage and frequency values were taken for the demographic variables of the participants (gender, age, sports age, athlete level and mileage status).
As can be seen in Table 1, as a result of the (skewness-kurtosis) test, it was concluded that the data showed a normal distribution. George and Mallery (2003) stated that if the skewness and kurtosis values are in the December range of +2 to -2, the distribution can be interpreted as normal [13]. The Z-test was applied in binary group comparisons using parametric tests in the data, the ANOVA test was applied in comparing more than two groups, and the Post Hoc Tukey multiple comparison test was applied to Decipher the difference between the groups.
When the demographic values are examined in Table 2, the study consists of 134 athletes, of which 77,6 % are men with 104 people and 22,4 % are women with 30 people. According to the age variable; 23,1 % of them are between the ages of 17-19, 27,6 % are between the ages of 20-21, 30,6 % are between the ages
Table 1
Normality Test
Scale Skewness Kurtosis
Thought Control -0,41б -0,834
Imagination -0,372 -0,294
Relaxation -0,378 -0,414
Don't Make An Effort -0,351 -0,б95
Logical Search Decryption -0,759 -0,230
Don't Search for Social Support Dec -0,43б -0,б78
Social Withdrawal -0,19б -0,40б
Mental Disorder -0,049 -0,4б5
resignation -0,201 -0,587
Expression of Unpleasant Feelings 0,153 -0,283
COPING WITH STRESS IN GENERAL 0,331 0,098
FINDINGS
Table 2
Frequency Distribution Related to Socio-Demographic Characteristics
Demographic Changes Frequency Percent (%)
17-19 Age 31 23,1
20-21 Age 37 27,б
Age 22-23 Age 41 30,б
24 Age and Above 25 18,7
Total 134 100
Man 104 77,б
Gender Women 30 22,4
Toplam 134 100
Amateur 90 б7,2
Athlete Level Professional 44 32,8
Total 134 100
Yes 39 29,1
Nationality Status No 95 70,9
Total 134 100
1-2 Year 48 35,8
3-4 Year 31 23,1
Sports Year 5-6 Year 27 20,1
7 Year and Above 28 20,9
Total 134 100
of 22-23 and 18,7 % are students aged 24 and older; according to the athlete level: 67,2 % of them are amateur athletes with 90 people, 32,8 % of them are professional athletes with 44 people. It was determined that 35,8 % of the participants had a sports year of 1-2 years, 23,1 % had a sports year of 3-4 years, 20,1 % had a sports year of 5-6 years and 20,9 % had a sports year of 7 years or more. It has been determined that 70,9 % of judoka are not national athletes and 29,1 % are national athletes.
When Table 3 was examined, it was found that the difference in the participants' general stress coping level score was significant according to the gender variable (p < 0,05).
Table 3
Gender-based i-test results of stress coping scores
General
and Sub-Dimensions Gender N x ss t sd P
of the Scale
Thought Control Man 104 16,27 2,92 0,406 132 0,686
Women 30 16,03 2,34
Don't Dream Man 104 16,47 2,55 3,463 132 0,001**
Women 30 14,60 2,81
Relaxation Man 104 15,82 3,27 1,363 132 0,175
Women 30 14,90 3,17
Don't Make An Effort Man 104 12,55 2,05 1,408 132 0,161
Women 30 11,97 1,85
Logical Search Decryption Man 104 16,27 3,17 2,888 132 0,005*
Women 30 14,30 3,70
Don't Search for Social Man 104 16,38 2,99 ■ -0,425 132 0,672
Support Dec Women 30 16,63 2,72
Social Withdrawal Man 104 12,89 3,99 1,656 132 0,099
Women 30 11,53 3,88
Mental Disorder Man 104 13,21 3,44 2,688 132 0,006**
Women 30 12,00 3,54
Withdrawal Man 104 13,54 3,78 1,392 132 0,166
Women 30 12,43 4,02
Expression of Unpleasant Man 104 12,94 3,64 ■ 2,517 132 0,004**
Feelings Women 30 11,50 3,58
COPING WITH STRESS Man 104 145,51 21,13 2,457 132 0,015*
IN GENERAL Women 30 135,00 18,80
Note: ** — p < 0,01, * — p < 0,05.
In terms of gender, significant differences were found in the participants' expression of unpleasant emotions, mental confusion, logical search and imagining sub-dimension scores (p < 0 Dec 05). When arithmetic values were examined in terms of gender, it was found that men had a higher average value than women with the imagination sub-dimension (x = 16,47) average, logical search
sub-dimension (x = 16,27) average, mental confusion sub-dimension (x = 13,21) average, expression of unpleasant emotions sub-dimension (x = 12,94) average and general stress coping level (x = 145,51) average (see Table 4).
Table 4
J-test results of stress coping scores according to athlete levels
General and Sub-Dimensions of the Scale Athlete Level N x ss t sd P
Thought Control Professional 44 16,27 2,90 0,162 132 0,871
Amateur 90 16,19 2,76
Don't Dream Professional 44 16,41 3,04 1,065 132 0,289
Amateur 90 15,88 2,54
Relaxation Professional 44 15,77 3,83 0,398 132 0,691
Amateur 90 15,53 2,96
Don't Make An Effort Professional 44 12,73 2,09 1,234 132 0,219
Amateur 89 12,27 1,97
Logical Search Decryption - Professional 44 16,61 3,78 2,156 132 0,047*
Amateur 90 15,44 3,12
Don't Search for Social Professional 44 16,32 3,30 -0,316 132 0,752
Support Dec Amateur 90 16,49 2,74
Social Withdrawal Professional 44 13,39 4,64 2,826 132 0,004**
Amateur 90 12,20 3,60
Mental Disorder Professional 44 13,27 3,55 0,770 132 0,442
Amateur 90 12,78 3,47
Withdrawal Professional 44 13,80 4,30 1,062 132 0,290
Amateur 90 13,04 3,60
Expression of Unpleasant Professional 44 13,20 4,39 1,295 132 0,198
Feelings Amateur 90 12,33 3,25
COPING WITH STRESS Professional 44 146,89 25,98 1,441 132 0,152
IN GENERAL Amateur 90 141,33 18,02
Note: ** — p < 0,01, * — p < 0,05.
There was no significant difference in the participants' overall stress coping level score according to the athlete level, except for the logical search and social withdrawal sub-dimensions, and in all other stress coping sub-dimensions (p > 0,05).
When arithmetic values were examined in terms of athlete level, it was found that professional-level athletes had a higher average value than amateur-level athletes with average values of logical search sub-dimension (x = 16,61) and social withdrawal sub-dimension (x = 13,39) Deciencies (see Table 5).
According to the nationality of the athletes participating in the study, there was no significant difference in the overall stress coping level score except for the imagining and social support search sub-dimensions and in all other stress coping sub-dimensions (p > 0,05).
Table 5
i-test results of stress coping scores according to nationality status
General and Sub-Dimensions of the Scale Nationality Status N x ss t sd P
Thought Control Yes 39 16,21 3,05 -0,030 132 0,976
No 95 16,22 2,71
Don't Dream Yes 39 16,72 2,89 2,022 132 0,047*
No 95 15,78 2,60
Relaxation Yes 39 15,46 3,60 -0,341 132 0,733
No 95 15,67 3,13
Don't Make An Effort Yes 39 12,51 2,11 0,337 132 0,737
No 95 12,38 1,98
Logical Search Decryption Yes 39 15,85 3,79 0,039 132 0,969
No 95 15,82 3,22
Don't Search for Social Yes 39 15,67 3,25 -2,013 132 0,048*
Support Dec No 95 16,75 2,74
Social Withdrawal Yes 39 12,72 4,15 0,238 132 0,812
No 95 12,54 3,95
Mental Disorder Yes 39 12,82 3,18 -0,254 132 0,800
No 95 12,99 3,62
Withdrawal Yes 39 12,62 4,43 -1,307 132 0,193
No 95 13,57 3,57
Expression of Unpleasant Yes 39 12,36 3,97 -0,525 132 0,600
Feelings No 95 12,73 3,55
COPING WITH STRESS Yes 39 142,13 24,16 -0,362 132 0,718
IN GENERAL No 95 143,58 19,73
Note: * — p < 0,05.
When arithmetic values were examined in terms of nationality status: it was observed that while the average value was high Deci-Decently in national athletes in the imagination sub-dimension (x = 16,72), it had a high average value among non-national athletes with an average value in the social support search sub-dimension (x = 16,75) (see Table 6).
Table 6
ANOVA results of stress scores according to age variable
Age N xx ss F p Significance
17-19 Year (1) 31 15,03 2,50
20-21 Year(2) 37 16,86 2,98
Thought 22-23 Year(3) 41 16,27 2,79 1 Я.11 0,041* 2 > 1
Control 24 Year 25 16,64 2,56 2,822
and Above (4)
Total 134 16,22 2,80
Естественно-научные основы физического воспитания и спортивной тренировки
71
Age
N
ss
F p Significance
Don't Dream
17-19 Year (1) 31 14,77 2,3б 20-21 Year (2) 37 1б,4б 2,82 22-23 Year (3) 41 1б,49 2,б3
24 Year and Above (4)
3,151 0,027* 3 > 1
25
1б,32 2,75
Total
134
1б,05
2,71
Relaxation
17-19 Year (1) 31 14,55 3,01 20-21 Year (2) 37 1б,57 3,44 22-23 Year (3) 41 15,71 2,90
24 Year and Above (4)
2,288 0,082
25
15,3б 3,57
Total
134
15,б1
3,2б
17-19 Year (1) 31
11,б1
1,84
20-21 Year(2) 3б
13,14
1,б9
Don't Make An Effort
22-23 Year (3) 41 12,15 2,21
24 Year and Above (4)
4,0б0 0,009** 2 > 1
25
12,84
1,97
Total
133
12,42
2,02
17-19 Year (1) 31
15,03
3,02
Logical
Search
Decryption
20-21 Year(2) 37 15,73
22-23 Year(3) 41
1б,20 3,30
24 Year and Above (4)
0,950 0,419
25
1б,3б 3,15
Total
134
15,83
3,38
17-19 Year (1) 31
1б,29
2,5б
Don't Search for Social Support Dec
20-21 Year (2) 37 17,57 2,бб 22-23 Year (3) 41 1б,32 3,00
24 Year and Above (4)
3,811 0,012* 2 > 4
25
15,12 3,13
Total
134
1б,43
2,92
17-19 Year (1) 31
12,39
3,30
Social Withdrawal
20-21 Year (2) 37 12,70 4,83 22-23 Year (3) 41 13,29 3,бб
24 Year and Above (4)
1,0б1 0,3б8
25
11,52
3,90
Total
134
12,59
3,99
Mental Disorder
17-19 Year (1) 31 12,32 2,бб 20-21 Year (2) 37 13,19 4,12 22-23 Year (3) 41 13,88 2,97
24 Year and Above (4)
2,334 0,077
25
11,80 3,8б
Total
134
12,94
3,49
Age N x ss F p Significance
17-19 Year (1) 31 13,26 2,42
20-21 Year(2) 37 13,43 4,36
Withdrawal 22-23 Year(3) 41 14,17 3,75 1 l^Q 0,085
24 Year 25 11,68 4,31 2,259
and Above(4)
Total 134 13,29 3,84
17-19 Year (1) 31 12,19 2,37
Expression of Unpleasant Feelings 20-21 Year(2) 37 12,78 4,01
22-23 Year(3) 41 13,24 3,95 П ЙОЙ 0,444
24 Year and Above(4) 25 11,88 3,98 0,898
Total 134 12,62 3,67
17-19 Year (1) 31 136,90 13,18
COPING 20-21 Year(2) 37 147,43 24,88
WITH 22-23 Year(3) 41 146,83 21,91 0,080
STRESS 24 Year 25 138,56 19,54 2,304
IN GENERAL and Above (4)
Total 134 143,16 21,03
Note: ** — p < 0,01, * — p < 0,05.
There were no significant differences in the general dimensions of coping with stress and relaxation, logical search, social withdrawal, mental confusion, withdrawal, expression of unpleasant emotions in athletes according to age variables (p > 0,05).
According to the age variable of judoka, significant differences were found in the sub-dimensions of thought control, imagining, making efforts and seeking social support of the scale (p < 0,05).
A significant difference was found in the thought control sub-dimension of the scale according to the age variable of the participants (p < 0,05). As a result of the Post-Hoc Tukey Multiple Comparison Test conducted to determine which group the difference was caused by; The difference between the 17-19 age group and the 20-21 age group was found to be significant (p < 0 Dec 05). When the average values of the thought control sub-dimension were examined, it was observed that the highest value (x = 16,86) was in the group between the ages of 20-21 Dec, and the lowest value (x = 15,03) was in the group between the ages of 17-19 Dec.
A significant difference was found in the imagining sub-dimension of the scale according to the age variable of the athletes (p < 0,05). As a result of the Post-Hoc Tukey Multiple Comparison Test conducted to determine which group the difference was caused by; The difference between the 17-19 age group and the 2223 age group was found to be significant (p < 0 Dec 05). When the average values of the imagination dimension were examined, it was observed that the highest value (x = 16,49) was in the group between the ages of 22-23 Dec, and the lowest value (x = 14,77) was in the group between the ages of 17-19 Dec.
A significant difference was found in the effort making sub-dimension of the scale according to the age variable of the participants (p < 0,05). As a result of the Post-Hoc Tukey Multiple Comparison Test conducted to determine which group the difference was caused by; The difference between the 17-19 age group and the 20-21 age group was found to be significant (p < 0 Dec 05). When the average values of the effort sub-dimension were examined, it was observed that the highest value (x = 13,14) was in the group between the ages of 20-21 Dec, and the lowest value (x = 11,61) was in the group between the ages of 17-19 Dec.
A significant difference was found in the social support search sub-dimension of the scale according to the age variable of the athletes (p < 0,05). Dec. As a result of the Post-Hoc Tukey Multiple Comparison Test conducted to determine which group the difference was caused by; The Deciency between the 20-21 age group and the 24 age group and older was found to be significant (p < 0,05).
When the average values of the social support search sub-dimension were examined, it was observed that the highest value (x = 17,57) was in the group between the ages of 20-21 Dec, and the lowest value (x = 15,12) was in the group aged 24 Dec and over (see Table 7).
Table 7
ANOVA results of stress scores according to the sports year variable
Sports Year
N
ss
Significance
1-2 Year(1)
48
1б,29 2,83
3-4 Year(2)
31
15,97 2,75
Thought Control
5-б Year (3)
27
1б,93 2,20
7 Year
and Above (4)
1,018 0,387
28
15,б8 3,27
Total
134
1б,22 2,80
1-2 Year(1)
48
15,9б 2,б7
3-4 Year(2)
31
15,13 2,73
Don't Dream
5-бYear(3)
27
17,07 2,50
7 Year
and Above (4)
2,789 0,045*
3 > 2
28
1б,25 2,73
Toplam
134 1б,05 2,71
1-2 Year (1)
48
15,б0 2,9б
3-4 Year(2)
31
15,32 2,91
Relaxation
5-бYear(3)
27
1б,78 2,83
7 Year
and Above (4)
1,81б 0,147
28
14,82 4,22
Total
134
15,б1 3,2б
1-2 Year (1)
48
12,23 2,02
3-4 Year(2)
31
12,00 1,95
Don't Make An Effort
5-бYear(3)
27
12,9б 2,07
7 Year
and Above (4)
1,401 0,24б
28
12,б8 1,98
Total
134
12,42 2,02
74 вестник мгпу ■ серия «естественные науки»
Sports Year N x ss F p Significance
1-2 Year(1) 48 14,67 3,30
Logical Search 3-4 Year(2) 31 15,81 3,16
5-6 Year(3) 27 17,63 2,65 - 4,909 0,003** 3 > 1
7 Year and Above (4)
Decryption 28 16,11 3,71
Total 134 15,83 3,38
1-2 Year (1) 48 16,73 2,51
Don't Search for Social 3-4 Year(2) 31 16,26 2,77
5-6 Year(3) 27 17,15 3,25 1,878 0,137
7 Year and Above (4)
Support Dec 28 15,43 3,27
Total 134 16,43 2,92
1-2 Year (1) 48 11,88 3,91
3-4 Year(2) 31 12,42 3,79
Social 5-6 Year(3) 27 14,22 3,85 - 2,104 0,103
Withdrawal 7 Year 28 12,43 4,24
and Above (4)
Total 134 12,59 3,99
1-2 Year(1) 48 13,08 3,59
3-4 Year(2) 31 13,74 2,25
Mental 5-6 Year(3) 27 13,30 4,00 2,775 0,047* 2 > 4
Disorder 7 Year 28 11,46 3,65
and Above (4)
Total 134 12,94 3,49
1-2 Year (1) 48 13,50 3,92
3-4 Year(2) 31 13,16 3,36
Withdrawal 5-6 Year(3) 27 14,37 3,98 1,795 0,151
7 Year 28 12,04 3,92
and Above (4)
Total 134 13,29 3,84
1-2 Year (1) 48 12,23 3,33
Expression of Unpleasant 3-4 Year(2) 31 12,90 3,47
5-6 Year(3) 27 12,96 4,24 - 0,318 0,813
7 Year and Above (4)
Feelings 28 12,64 3,96
Total 134 12.62 3.67
1-2 Year (1) 48 141,23 19,78
COPING 3-4 Year(2) 31 142,23 18,11
WITH 5-6 Year(3) 27 152,30 22,62 2,347 0,076
STRESS 7 Year 28 138,68 22,98
IN GENERAL and Above (4)
Toplam 134 143,16 21,03
Note: ** — p < 0,01, * — p < 0,05.
According to the sports year variable of the participants, there was no significant difference in the overall stress coping level score except for the "imagining, logical search and mental confusion" sub-dimensions and in all other stress coping sub-dimensions (p > 0,05).
A significant difference was found in the imagining sub-dimension of the scale according to the sports year variable of the athletes (p < 0,05). As a result of the Post-Hoc Tukey Multiple Comparison Test conducted to determine which group the difference is caused by; The difference was found to be significant between judoka with 5-6 years of sports experience and groups with 3-4 years of sports experience (p < 0,05). When the average values of the imagination sub-dimension were examined; it was observed that the highest value (x = 17,07) was in the group with a 5-6 year sports year, and the lowest value (x = 15,13) was in the group with a 3-4 year sports year.
A significant difference was found in the logical search sub-dimension of the scale according to the participants' sports year variable (p < 0,05). As a result of the Post-Hoc Tukey Multiple Comparison Test conducted to determine which group caused the difference; It was found that the difference was significant between judoka with 5-6 years of sports experience and groups with 1-2 years of sports experience (p < 0 Dec 05). When the average values of the logical search sub-dimension were examined, it was observed that the highest value (x = 17,63) was in the group with a 5-6 year sports year, and the lowest value (x = 14,67) was in the group with a 1-2 year sports year.
A significant difference was found in the mental disorder sub-dimension of the scale according to the athletes' sports year variable (p < 0,05). As a result of the Post-Hoc Tukey Multiple Comparison Test conducted to determine which group caused the difference; It was found that the difference was significant between judoka with 3-4 years of sports experience and groups with 7 years of sports experience and above (p < 0,05). When the average values of the mental disorder sub-dimension were examined; it was observed that the highest value (x = 13,74) was in the group with a sports year of 3-4 years, and the lowest value (x = 11,47) was in the group with a sports year of 7 years and above.
Discussion and conclusion
When the demographic variables of the athletes participating in the study were examined, 77,6 % of them were men with 104 people, and 22,4 % of them were women with 30 people, consisting of 134 athletes in total. According to the age variable; 23,1 % of them are between the ages of 17-19, 27,6 % are between the ages of 20-21, 30,6 % are between the ages of 22-23 and 18,7 % are students aged 24 and older; according to the athlete level: 67,2 % of them are amateur athletes with 90 people, 32,8 % of them are professional athletes with 44 people. It was determined that 35,8 % of the participants had a sports year of 1-2 years, 23,1 % had
a sports year of 3-4 years, 20,1 % had a sports year of 5-6 years and 20,9 % had a sports year of 7 years or more. It has been determined that 70,9 % of judoka are not national athletes and 29,1 % are national athletes.
It has been concluded that there is a significant difference in the general level of coping with stress score according to the gender variable of the athletes participating in the research. It has been determined that this difference has a higher mean value for men than women. In the study of M. C. Çetin (2009) in which he examined the decision-making styles, social skill levels and ways of coping with stress of BESYO students, it was found that there was a significant difference between the genders of the students and their styles of coping with stress [9]. It was determined that the mean score of the male students was significantly higher than that of the male students.
N. Arsan (2007) found a significant difference in the use of support seeking and avoidance strategies in coping with male and female athletes. There was no significant difference in their use of cognitive and physical effort, relaxation, social withdrawal and expressing unpleasant emotions strategies [1].
According to the athlete level variable of the athletes participating in the research, it was concluded that there was a significant difference in the levels of coping with stress in the logical search and social withdrawal sub-dimensions. It has been determined that this difference has a higher average value than the athletes at the professional level compared to the athletes at the amateur level.
It has been concluded that there is a significant difference in the levels of coping with stress in the sub-dimensions of dreaming and seeking social support according to the nationality status of the athletes participating in the research.
It has been concluded that there is a significant difference in the social support seeking sub-dimension of the scale according to the age variable of the athletes participating in the research. As a result of the Post-Hoc Tukey Multiple Comparison Test conducted to determine which group the difference originated from; There was a significant difference between the 20-21 age group and the 24 and over age group. In their study, E. Bebetsos and P. Antoniou (2003) revealed that older athletes were better prepared to cope with negativities and showed higher emotional control [5]. Reaching a similar conclusion, M. J. Goyen and M. H. Anshel (1998) concluded that adult athletes are more successful in using coping strategies than adolescent athletes [12]. When the stress coping styles of the participants were compared in terms of age, it was determined that there was no statistically significant difference between the ages of the participants in the study of "The Ways of Coping with Stress of Physical Education and Sports Teachers Working in Primary and Secondary Schools" by H. Kirimoglu, Y. Yildirim, and A. Temiz (2011) [17].
A significant difference was found in the mental confusion sub-dimension of the scale according to the sports year variable of the athletes participating in the research. As a result of the Post-Hoc Tukey Multiple Comparison Test conducted to determine which group the difference originated from; There was a significant difference between the judokas with 3-4 years of sports experience
and the groups with 7 or more years of sports experience. There are studies that show that as individuals' age and experience increase, their strategies for coping with stress increase. For example, studies by Z. Tuncel, A. M. Yalfin-kaya (2000) [20], Balci (2000) [2], Bulut (2005) [7]. In this context, the findings obtained from these studies do not show similarities with the findings obtained in this study. On the other hand, in studies conducted with different groups, for example, Z. Tuncel, A. M. Yalfinkaya (2000) [20], ^ardak (2002) [8] stated that age has no effect on strategies for coping with stress. In a study in which M. Eraslan, A. Karafil and E. Atay (2017) evaluated the methods of coping with stress in terms of the duration of doing sports, a decrease was observed in the mean scores of coping with stress as the duration of doing sports increased, and no significant differences were found [15].
References
1. Arsan N. Turkiye'de sporcularin stresle ba§a fikma davrani§larinin belirlenmesi // Yayimlanmami§ Yuksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu Spor Bilimleri Ve Teknolojisi Programi. Ankara, 2007.
2. Balci A. Ogretim Elemaninin Stresi Kuram ve Uygulama. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim, 2000.
3. Balcioglu i., Savrun M. Stres ve hormonlar // Turkiye Klinikleri Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2001. T. 2. № 1. P. 43-50.
4. Balta§ A., Balta§ Z. Stres ve ba§afikma yollari. (20. Baski). istanbul: Remzi Kita-bevi, 2000.
5. Bebetsos E., Antoniou P. Psychological skills of Greek badminton athlete's // Perceptual and motor skills. 2003. T. 97. № 3_suppl. P. 1289-1296.
6. Bozkurt T. Stres / T. Bozkurt, M. Ulug, A. £elik Turpoglu et al. istanbul: TC istanbul Kultur Universitesi Yayinlari, 2010. 26 p.
7. Bulut Bozkurt N. ilkogretim ogretmenlerinde, stres yaratan ya§am olaylari ve stresle ba§afikma tarzlarinin ?e§itli degi§kenlerle ili§kisi // Gazi Universitesi Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi. 2005. T. 13. № 2. P. 467-478.
8. £ardak M. ilkogretim okullarinda fali§an ogretmenlerin i§ doyumu ile stresle ba§afikma yollari: dis. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu. 2002.
9. £etin M. Beden egitimi ve spor yuksekokulu ogrencilerinin karar verme stil-leri, sosyal beceri duzeyleri ve stresle ba§a ?ikma bifimlerinin bazi degi§kenler a^isindan kar§ila§tirmali olarak incelenmesi // DoNtora Tezi, Gazi Universitesi, AnNara, TurNiye. 2009.
10. Doganer S. Duzenli Egzersiz Programinin Bireylerin Stres. Mutluluk ve Serbest Zaman Doyum Duzeylerine Etkisi, Doktora Tezi, Ankara Universitesi, Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu. Ankara. 2017
11. Ford C. G., Shook N. J. Negative cognitive bias and perceived stress: Independent mediators of the relation between mindfulness and emotional distress // Mindfulness. 2019. T. 10. P. 100-110.
12. Goyen M. J., Anshel M. H. Sources of acute competitive stress and use of coping strategies as a function of age and gender // Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 1998. T. 19. № 3. P. 469-486.
13. George D., Mallery M. Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 2003.
14. Gundogdu R., Adiguzel 0. Stres ve yaratici drama: Universite ogrencileri ile yapilan bir ?ali§ma // Yaratici Drama Dergisi. 2016. T. 11. № 1. P. 45-70.
15. Eraslan M., Karafil A. Y, Atay E. Universiteler arasi spor musabakalarina katilan muay thai sporcularinin §iddet egilimlerinin degerlendirilmesi-assessment of violence tendency of muay thai athletes participating in intercollegiate sport competitions // Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi. 2017. T. 9. № 22. P. 404-412.
16. Karasar N. Ara§tirmalarda Rapor Hazirlama // Nobel Yayinevi. Ankara, 2009.
17. Kirimoglu H., Yildirim Y., Temiz A. ilk ve ortaogretim okullarinda gorev yapan beden egitimi ve spor ogretmenlerinin yilmazlik duzeylerinin incelenmesi (Hatay ili ornegi). 2010.
18. Lazarus R. S. From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks // Annual review of psychology. 1993. T. 44. № 1. P. 1-22.
19. Selye H. The Evolution of the Stress Concept: The originator of the concept traces its development from the discovery in 1936 of the alarm reaction to modern therapeutic applications of syntoxic and catatoxic hormones // American scientist. 1973. T. 61. № 6. P. 692-699.
20. Tuncel Z., Yalfinkaya A. M. Futbolcularin Stres Duzeyleri ve Ba§a £ikma Strateji-leri H // U. Spor Bilimleri T, Okulu. 2000. P. 3-5.
