Научная статья на тему 'Intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry in spinal cord conus lipoma surgery in children'

Intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry in spinal cord conus lipoma surgery in children Текст научной статьи по специальности «Клиническая медицина»

CC BY
96
12
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Журнал
Хирургия позвоночника
Scopus
ВАК
Область наук
Ключевые слова
spinal cord conus lipoma / lipomyelomeningocele / tethered cord sysndrome / surgical treatment / intraoperative monitoring / rectal manometry

Аннотация научной статьи по клинической медицине, автор научной работы — Kirill Vladimirovich Sysoev, Konstantin Aleksandrovich Samochernykh, William Aramovich Khachatryan

Objective. To assess a potential of using intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry to prevent bladder dysfunction in surgical treatment of the spinal cord conus lipoma. Material and Methods. The results of surgical treatment of 59 children with lipomas of the spinal cord conus were studied. The presence of urological symptoms (urinary retention or incontinence) was assessed before and after surgery. Intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry was performed in 22 cases with registration of signs of irritation (increased pressure in the rectal ampulla) and depression (decreased pressure in the rectal ampulla) of sacral parasympathetic centers which allowed controlling their proximity and tolerance to the performed manipulations. Results. Urological symptoms before surgery were detected in 25 (42 %) patients: urinary retention in 7 (28 %), and incontinence in 18 (72 %). Symptoms were significantly more often detected in children older than 3 years (p < 0.05). Intraoperatively, a transient decrease in pressure in the rectal ampulla was noted during bipolar coagulation, and a decrease in pressure in the rectal ampulla was noted during ultrasound disintegration. The most pronounced changes in pressure were observed during manipulations along the borderline between the lipoma and the spinal cord in the zone of localization of sacral parasympathetic centers. Persistent profound changes in pressure (>3 mm Hg) have precluded from the total removal of lipoma in all 22 patients; subtotal or partial lipoma removal and release of the tethered spinal cord were achieved in all cases. None of the patients operated on using rectal ampullar manometry presented urinary retention after surgery, these disorders developed in 12 (32 %) children operated on without this procedure (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Paresis or paralysis of the bladder detrusor after removal of the spinal cord conus lipoma may result from direct damage to the parasympathetic sacral centers located at the borderline between the lipoma and the spinal cord. The method of intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry allows protecting the functions of the pelvic organs and determining the safe volume of lipoma resection.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry in spinal cord conus lipoma surgery in children»

hirurgia pozvonochnika 2019;16(3):55-61 © k.v. sysoev et al., 2019

intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry in spinal cord conus lipoma surgery in children

K.V. Sysoev, K.A. Samochernykh, W.A. Khachatryan

Almazov National Medical Research Centre, St. Petersburg, Russia

Objective. To assess a potential of using intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry to prevent bladder dysfunction in surgical treatment of the spinal cord conus lipoma.

Material and Methods. The results of surgical treatment of 59 children with lipomas of the spinal cord conus were studied. The presence of urological symptoms (urinary retention or incontinence) was assessed before and after surgery. Intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry was performed in 22 cases with registration of signs of irritation (increased pressure in the rectal ampulla) and depression (decreased pressure in the rectal ampulla) of sacral parasympathetic centers which allowed controlling their proximity and tolerance to the performed manipulations.

Results. Urological symptoms before surgery were detected in 25 (42 %) patients: urinary retention in 7 (28 %), and incontinence in 18 (72 %). Symptoms were significantly more often detected in children older than 3 years (p < 0.05). Intraoperatively, a transient decrease in pressure in the rectal ampulla was noted during bipolar coagulation, and a decrease in pressure in the rectal ampulla was noted during ultrasound disintegration. The most pronounced changes in pressure were observed during manipulations along the borderline between the lipoma and the spinal cord in the zone of localization of sacral parasympathetic centers. Persistent profound changes in pressure (>3 mm Hg) have precluded from the total removal of lipoma in all 22 patients; subtotal or partial lipoma removal and release of the tethered spinal cord were achieved in all cases. None of the patients operated on using rectal ampullar manometry presented urinary retention after surgery, these disorders developed in 12 (32 %) children operated on without this procedure (p < 0.05).

Conclusion. Paresis or paralysis of the bladder detrusor after removal of the spinal cord conus lipoma may result from direct damage to the parasympathetic sacral centers located at the borderline between the lipoma and the spinal cord. The method of intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry allows protecting the functions of the pelvic organs and determining the safe volume of lipoma resection. Key Words: spinal cord conus lipoma, lipomyelomeningocele, tethered cord sysndrome, surgical treatment, intraoperative monitoring, rectal manometry.

Please cite this paper as: Sysoev KV, Samochernykh KA, Khachatryan WA. Intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry in spinal cord conus lipoma surgery in children. Hir. Pozvonoc. 2019; 16(3):55—61. In Russian. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14531/ss20193.55-61.

Although surgical resection of spinal cord conus lipomas in treatment of children with tethered cord syndrome is one of the conventional approaches typically used by pediatric neurosurgeons, the question regarding the optimal tumor resection volume still remains disputable [1, 2]. The advantages of total lipoma resection are known [3]; however, this type of resection may lead to bladder detrusor paralysis, which is believed to be caused by damage to the functionally important spinal nerve roots and/ or the posterior columns of the spinal cord [4-6]. Various methods for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring have been proposed to prevent these complications, but it was found later that the use of these techniques is limit-

ed. Thus, stimulation mapping of spinal nerve roots does not ensure continuous monitoring; evoked potentials (including the bulbocavernosus reflex) are often unobtainable in children and symptomatic patients [6, 7], while the direct intraoperative monitoring of urodynamics is accompanied by substantial technical difficulties, such as the delayed response to stimulation and the need to take into account the changes in abdominal pressure [6, 8, 9].

It is fair to assume that reasonable limitation of tumor resection volume when its maximum resection is possible may reduce the risk of neuro-uro-logical complications. Earlier, intraoperative rectal manometry was used only to detect sacral spinal nerve roots: to do

55

that, a balloon sensor was placed at a level of the anal canal [10-12]. Taking into account that the external and internal anal sphincters are cross-innervated, this procedure later gave way to needle electromyography of the external anal sphincter [13]. Electromyography of the external anal sphincter enabled monitoring of the function of anal and urethral sphincters but not of bladder detrusor [8].

An incentive for performing this study was the integrity of parasympa-thetic segmental innervation of the rectal ampulla and bladder detrusor, making it possible to use intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry to justify the reduction of safe volume of neurosurgi-cal interventions (subtotal lipoma resec-

kv. sysoev et al. intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry in spinal cord conus lipoma surgery in children

tion) in terms of its functional permissibility (prevention of neuro-urological complications).

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry can be used to prevent bladder dysfunction after surgical treatment of spinal cord conus lipoma.

This was a retrospective-prospective single-center group-control study, with sequential parallel comparison design.

Material and Methods

The outcomes of surgeries performed in 59 children with spinal cord conus lipomas at the Pediatric Neurosurgery Department of the A.L. Polenov Russian Neurosurgical Institute (since 2014, a branch of the V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center) in 2004-2018 were analyzed. Patients with dorsal, transitional, and caudal types of spinal cord conus lipomas (according to the classification suggested by Chapman, 1982) were enrolled. The age distribution of patients is shown in Table 1.

Indication for surgery was the diagnosis of tethered cord syndrome presenting as a combination of sensory loss, weakness and lower extremity deformities, as well as pelvic organ dysfunction.

It was evaluated whether or not the patients had urological symptoms (urinary retention or incontinence) before and after the surgery (Table 2, 3). Only one factor, postoperative changes in the urological status (the emergence of urinary incontinence symptoms), was analyzed in this study.

The microsurgical technique of lipoma resection using an ultrasonic destructor and stimulation mapping of spinal nerve roots was employed in all the cases. Until 2015, either total or subtotal resection was performed (in 37 of 59 analyzed patients). Intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry started to be used since 2015 (in 22 patients).

The compared groups (patients operated on using rectal manometry and without it) were matched in terms of patient number, patients' age distribution, and severity of preoperative urological symptoms.

Manometry procedure. During the study, a Foley catheter balloon equipped with a pre-tested pressure sensor (a Cod-man microsensor to monitor intracra-nial pressure) was inserted into the rectal ampulla (Fig. 1a). The depth of balloon catheter implantation was determined according to the coronal MRI data (Fig. 1b). The sensor was calibrated by measuring pressure attained after 5 ml of water had been added to the balloon under atmospheric pressure (~531-535 mm Hg). This parameter was set as the initial pressure level by pressing the «P ^ 0» button on the instrument panel. Next, normal saline bolus (1 ml) was consecutively administered, and changes in pressure applied to the sensor were recorded. After the implantation, the balloon was also consecutively filled with normal saline to a level when dissociation between the volume/pressure ratio started to be observed under atmospheric pressure (the balloon being placed inside the rectum; Fig. 1c). This was required to ensure an elastic contact between the balloon and the rectal wall.

Next, the deviation of pressure from the value achieved upon elastic contact between the balloon and the rectal wall (pressure at the point of dissociation of the volume/pressure ratio) was taken into account. The detected intraoperative changes in pressure gave grounds to suggest either irritation (increased pressure) or depression (reduced pressure) of the function of sacral parasym-pathetic centers, which made it possible to estimate their proximity and tolerance to the manipulations being performed. In all cases, the manipulations were stopped once the initial pressure values had been attained. That was how the contractile activity in smooth muscle of the rectal ampulla was continuously monitored.

All the intraoperatively applied methods were approved by the Ethics Committee of the medical institution; a written informed consent was obtained from all the patients enrolled in this study or their legal representatives. The effectiveness of the method was verified by statistical analysis (Pearson x2 test and Fisher's exact test; the p < 0.05 value was considered statistically significant).

Results and Discussion

Pathological urological symptoms were detected in 25 (42 %) patients: symptoms of urinary retention and incontinence were revealed in 7 (28 %) and 18 (72 %) patients, respectively. Children older than 3 years were significantly more likely to be symptomatic (p < 0.05). After the surgery, 12 (32 %) of 37 patients operated on without using rectal manometry presented symptoms of urinary retention. These disorders were detected in none of the patients operated on using rectal ampullar manometry. The intergroup difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Specifically, the intraoperative changes in rectal pressure were multi-directional for bipolar coagulation and ultrasonic disintegration. In the former case, pressure was reduced, while being increased in the latter case. No correlation between changes in pressure and motor responses from the external anal sphincter were observed (Fig. 2).

The most profound pressure changes were detected upon manipulations at the lipoma-spinal cord boundary, in the zone where the parasympathetic centers of the lateral horns of spinal cord are located. A persistent profound pressure elevation (by > 3 mm Hg) made total lipoma resection infeasible in 22 patients who had undergone rectal ampullar manometry. However, subtotal or partial resection allowed one to perform tethered cord release in all these cases, resulting in a positive outcome in terms of the neurological symptoms.

Fig. 3 illustrates the partial lipoma resection with a good clinical outcome

Table 1

Age distribution of the patients under study

Age, years Patients, n

<1 year 19

From 1 to 3 13

From 3 to 6 11

From 6 to 10 4

From 10 to 14 9

From 14 to 17 3

_56_

tumors and inflammatory diseases of the spine

k.v. sysoev et al. intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry in spinal cord conus lipoma surgery in children

Gximan

sEi

nstf rOKC

^—"* Ï & 7

Viilum»*, nn1 I'll riYIlllll H— l"l 11 lili nplirl I

Fig. 1

Pre-testing of the balloon equipped with a pressure sensor (a), measuring the depth of implantation of the balloon catheter according to the coronal MRI data (b), and calibration of the sensor (c): after 5 ml of water had been added, the initial pressure P0 was 535 mm Hg; dissociation of the volume/pressure ratio was achieved after 6 ml of normal saline had been fed into the balloon

achieved. Fig. 4 shows the total lipoma resection accompanied by postoperative urological complications.

None of the patients had wound complications (hematoma or suppuration) that could affect the neurological outcome of the surgery. Specifically, the pre-operative urological symptoms in children were not changed after the surgery in both groups (Tables 2, 3).

The problems related to surgical treatment of spinal cord conus lipomas in children have been regularly discussed at international meetings of pediatric neurosurgeons. It is worth mentioning that the microsurgical technique of the surgery has been repeatedly described in the literature, while the development of wound complications is comparable in

large case series and is not considered to be a reason for focal neurological complications, including the neurogenic pelvic organ dysfunction [3, 4, 6]. Hence, the question of determining the optimal (radical or partial) resection volume of spinal cord conus lipoma in terms of the functional outcome of a surgery remains the most widely discussed issue. Any new data on the putative mechanisms of the development of postoperative complications have a scientific value.

Although the rate of neurological complications in surgery of the spinal cord conus lipoma is ~5 % [3, 4, 6], it was found that up to 80 % of asymptomatic patients have abnormal bladder dynamics, while postsurgical aggravation in bladder dynamics can be revealed in

57

20 % of patients [14, 15]. The involuntary activity of the bladder and rectum are known to be governed by the reciprocal cross-regulation mechanism. At the segmental level, this regulation is performed by the lumbar sympathetic and sacral parasympathetic centers. The sympathetic centers are responsible for the contraction of bladder and anal sphincters, ensuring the continence of urine and feces; the parasympathetic centers stimulate the contractile activity of the detru-sor and rectal ampulla, thus causing micturition and defecation [3]. We believe that the reason for the most frequent complication (paralysis/paresis of the bladder detrusor) is the dysembryoge-netic features of formation of spinal cord conus lipomas, since tumor invasion of

kv. sysoev et al. intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry in spinal cord conus lipoma surgery in children

Fig. 3

A 2-month-old patient with foot deformity having no urological symptoms: partial lipoma resection under guidance of rectal manometry and tethered cord release. No symptoms were observed within 4 years after the surgery

the opened neural placode occurs at the level of sacral parasympathetic centers that regulate the pelvic organ function [5, 16, 17]. In our opinion, paralysis/paresis of bladder detrusor after resection of spinal cord conus lipoma may result from direct damage to the centers residing in

the lateral horns of the spinal cord rather than spinal nerve roots or the posterior columns of the spinal cord, as it was believed previously [6].

Rectal ampullar manometry allowed one to detect signs of irritation or depression of sacral parasympathetic

centers during resection of spinal cord conus lipoma, which presented as an elevation or reduction of pressure applied to the balloon catheter by the rectal wall. Hence, continuous intraoperative monitoring of the function of sacral parasym-pathetic centers prevented their damage as the surgeons did not perform total lipoma resection. Due to its technical simplicity, rectal ampullar manometry can be considered an efficient method for intraoperative monitoring of the pelvic functions during microsurgical resection of spinal cord conus lipomas in children, thus allowing neurosurgeons to safely perform surgeries without using the unnecessary procedures and expensive monitoring equipment.

Conclusions

Paresis or paralysis of the bladder detru-sor after resection of the spinal cord conus lipoma can result from direct damage to the sacral parasympathetic centers located on the spinal cord-lipoma boundary. Their functions can be monitored intraoperatively using rectal ampullar manometry. This method can be used to preserve the bladder and rectal function and to determine the safe tumor resection volume.

58

Table 2

Characteristics of patients operated on without using rectal

ampullar manometry

Patients Age, months Preoperatively Postoperatively

1st 1 I I

2nd 1 I I

3rd 3 N N

4th 3 N R

5th 5 N N

6th 5 N N

7th 6 N N

8th 7 N R

9th 8 I I

10th 8 N R

11th 10 N R

12th 10 N R

13th 16 N N

14th 23 N R

15th 24 N R

16th 28 I R

17th 31 N R

18th 36 I R

19th 36 N R

20th 39 R R

21th 47 N R

22th 48 I I

23th 48 N N

24th 50 N N

25th 72 I I

26th 72 I R

27th 72 I I

28th 84 N N

29th 84 N R

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

30th 120 I I

31th 120 R R

32th 120 N I

33th 120 N N

34th 132 I I

35th 144 N N

36th 156 R R

37th 216 R R

N — without urological symptoms; R — urinary retention;

I — urinary incontinence.

Table 3 Characteristics of patients operated on using rectal ampullar manometry

Patients Age, months Preoperatively Postoperatively

1st 2 N N

2nd 2 N N

3rd 4 I I

4th 4 N N

5th 5 N N

6th 8 N N

7th 8 N N

8th 14 N N

9th 15 R R

10th 16 N N

11th 19 N N

12th 33 R N

13th 33 N N

14th 45 N N

15 th 48 I I

16 th 48 I I

17 th 96 I I

18 th 108 I I

19 th 120 I I

20th 156 R

21th 180 I I

22th 204 N N

N — without urological symptoms; R — urinary retention; I — urinary incontinence.

The risk of these complications can be reduced only if the spinal surgeons reasonably stop performing total lipoma resection. The use of intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry during these surgeries allows one to intraoperatively control safe volume of lipoma resection, thus preventing postoperative bladder dysfunction. The reasonably safe extent of lipoma resection in this case ensures a better functional outcome than total lipoma resection does.

Limitations of the study

1. This study did not focus on such complications of resection of spinal cord conus lipomas as defecation disorders. Constipation is similar to urinary retention but is not as clinically important and is occult more often. Nevertheless, the similar pathogenesis of these conditions gives grounds for assuming that the proposed method will reduce the risk of these complications as well.

2. The study was not aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation or the long-term outcomes of neuro-urological complications after resection of spinal cord conus lipomas.

3. The multidirectional nature of changes in rectal pressure in response to the manipulations performed using a bipolar coagu-lator and an ultrasonic destructor are of undoubted interest for further research in the field of functional spinal neurosurgery. In this study, we have only outlined these differences.

The authors are grateful to Professor I.B. Osipov, the Head of the Urology Division of the St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, and Professor S.N. Larionov, the leading researcher of the Neurosurgery Clinical Research Department of Irkutsk Regional Pediatric Clinical Hospital, for their assistance and consultations during manuscript preparation.

The study had no sponsorship. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

59

kv. sysoev et al. intraoperative rectal ampullar manometry in spinal cord conus lipoma surgery in children

References

1. Hoving EW, Haitsma E, Oude Ophuis CM, Journee HL. The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in tethered cord surgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27:1445-1452. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-011-1471-4.

2. Kulkarni AV, Pierre-Kahn A, Zerah M. Conservative management of asymptomatic spinal lipomas of the conus. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:868-873. DOI: 10.1227/01. neu.0000114923.76542.81.

3. Pang D, Zovickian J, Oviedo A. Long-term outcome of total and near-total resection of spinal cord lipomas and radical reconstruction of the neural placode, part II: outcome analysis and preoperative profiling. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:253-272. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000363598.81101.7B.

4. La Marca F, Grant JA, Tomita T, McLone DG. Spinal lipomas in children: outcome of 270 procedures. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997;26:8-16. DOI: 10.1159/000121155.

5. Morota N, Ihara S, Ogiwara H New classification of spinal lipomas based on embryonic stage. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;19:428-439. DOI: 10.3171/2016.10.PEDS16247.

6. Pierre-Kahn A, Zerah M, Renier D, Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Lellouch-Tubiana A, Brunelle F, Le Merrer M, Giudicelli Y, Pichon J, Kleinknecht B, Nataf F. Congenital lumbosacral lipomas. Childs Nerv Syst. 1997;13:298-334. DOI: 10.1007/ s003810050090.

7. Deletis V, Vodusek DB. Intraoperative recording of the bulbocavernosus reflex. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:88-92. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199701000-00019.

8. Schaan M, Boszczyk B, Jaksche H, Kramer G, Gunther M, Stohrer M. Intraoperative urodynamics in spinal cord surgery: a study of feasibility. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:39-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0619-7.

9. Shinomiya K, Fuchioka M, Matsuoka T, Okamoto A, Yoshida H, Mutoh N, Furuya K, Andoh M. Intraoperative monitoring for tethered spinal cord syndrome. Spine. 1991;16:1290-1294.

10. James HE, Mulcahy JJ, Walsh JW, Kaplan GW. Use of anal sphincter electromyog-raphy during operations on the conus medullaris and sacral nerve roots. Neurosurgery. 1979;4:521-523. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-197906000-00005.

11. Pang D, Casey K. Use of an anal sphincter pressure monitor during operations on the sacral spinal cord and nerve roots. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:562-568. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198311000-00013.

12. Ikeda K, Kubota T, Kashihara K, Yamamoto S. Anorectal pressure monitoring during surgery on sacral lipomeningocele. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1986;64:155-156. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1986.64.1.0155.

13. Sorensen M, Tetzschner T, Rasmussen OO, Christiansen J. Relation between electromyography and anal manometry of the external anal sphincter. Gut. 1991;32:1031-1034. DOI: 10.1136/gut.32.9.1031.

14. Houser EE, Bartholomew TH, Cookson MS, Marlin AE, Little NA. A prospective evaluation of leak point pressure, bladder compliance and clinical status in myelodysplasia patients with tethered spinal cords. J Urol. 1994;151:177-180. DOI: 10.1016/ s0022-5347(17)34910-8.

15. Meyrat BJ, Tercier S, Lutz N, Rilliet B, Forcada-Guex M, Vernet O. Introduction of a urodynamic score to detect pre- and postoperative neurological deficits in children with a primary tethered cord. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19:716-721. DOI: 10.1007/ s00381-003-0829-7.

16. Fowler CJ, Griffiths D, de Groat WC. The neural control of micturition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:453-466. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2401.

17. Antherieu P, Levy R, De Saint Denis T, Lohkamp L, Paternoster G, Di Rocco F, Boddaert N, Zerah M. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and Tractography of the spinal cord in pediatric population with spinal lipomas: preliminary study. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35:129-137. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-3935-2.

Address correspondence to:

Sysoev Kirill Vladimirovich Almazov National Medical Research Centre 2 Akkuratova street, St. Petersburg, 197341, Russia, [email protected]

Received 22.07.2019 Review completed01.08.2019 Passed for printing 12.08.2019

Kirill Vladimirovich Sysoev, MD, PhD, senior researcher, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 2 Akkuratova street, St. Petersburg, 197341, Russia, ORCID: 0000-0002-6868-1186, [email protected];

Konstantin Aleksandrovich Samochernykh, DMSc, leading researcher, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 2 Akkuratova street, St. Petersburg, 197341, Russia, ORCID: 0000-0001-5295-4912, [email protected];

William Aramovich Khachatryan, DMSc, Prof., chief researcher, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 2 Akkuratova street, St. Petersburg, 197341, Russia, ORCID: 0000-0002-1635-6621, [email protected].

60

61

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.