CC BY
68ISSN 2072-5981 doi: 10.26907/mrsej
aänetic Resonance in Solids
Electronic Journal
Volume 21 Issue 2 Paper No 19205 1-7 pages 2019
doi: 10.26907/mrsej-19205
http: //mrsej. kpfu. ru http: //mrsej. ksu. ru
Established and published by Kazan University Endorsed by International Society of Magnetic Resonance (ISMAR) Registered by Russian Federation Committee on Press (#015140),
August 2, 1996 First Issue appeared on July 25, 1997
© Kazan Federal University (KFU)*
"Magnetic Resonance in Solids. Electronic Journal" (MRSey) is a
peer-reviewed, all electronic journal, publishing articles which meet the highest standards of scientific quality in the field of basic research of a magnetic resonance in solids and related phenomena.
Indexed and abstracted by Web of Science (ESCI, Clarivate Analytics, from 2015), Scopus (Elsevier, from 2012), RusIndexSC (eLibrary, from 2006), Google Scholar, DOAJ, ROAD, CyberLeninka (from 2006), SCImago Journal & Country Rank, etc.
Editor-in-Chief Boris Kochelaev (KFU, Kazan)
Honorary Editors
Jean Jeener (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels) Raymond Orbach (University of California, Riverside)
Executive Editor
Yurii Proshin (KFU, Kazan) mrsej@kpfu. ru
0 © I This work is licensed under a Creative ^-¿■¿»J Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Technical Editor Alexander Kutuzov (KFU, Kazan)
Editors
Vadim Atsarkin (Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics, Moscow) Yurij Bunkov (CNRS, Grenoble) Mikhail Eremin (KFU, Kazan) David Fushman (University of Maryland, College Park) Hugo Keller (University of Zürich,
Zürich)
Yoshio Kitaoka (Osaka University,
Osaka)
Boris Malkin (KFU, Kazan) Alexander Shengelaya (Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi) Jörg Sichelschmidt (Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Dresden) Haruhiko Suzuki (Kanazawa University, Kanazava) Murat Tagirov (KFU, Kazan) Dmitrii Tayurskii (KFU, Kazan) Valentine Zhikharev (KNRTU,
Kazan)
* In Kazan University the Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) was discovered by Zavoisky E.K. in 1944.
Short cite this: Magn. Reson. Solids 21, 19205 (2019)
doi: 10.26907/mrsej-19205
Influence of structure effects and orbital ordering on the magnetic hyperfine field in pyrochlore oxides R2V2O7 (R = Lu, Yb, Tm, Er, Ho):
ab initio calculations
P.A. Agzamova
M.N. Miheev Institute of Metal Physics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, S. Kovalevskaya str. 18, Ekaterinburg 620108, Russia Ural Federal University, Mira str. 19, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia E-mail: [email protected]
(Received March 19, 2019; revised May 27, 2019; accepted May 28, 2019; published June 14, 2019)
The detailed ab initio calculations of crystal structure and hyperfine interaction parameters are presented for R2V2O7 system (R = Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu) to investigate the effect of the V-ion environment due to R-ion substitution on the local magnetic properties of 51V nucleus. It is shown that this effect is very small, but the orbital ordering dictates a large anisotropy of magnetic hyperfine tensor in R2V2O7 system.
PACS: 71.15.Mb, 71.20.Be, 74.25.nj, 75.25.Dk, 75.47.Lx.
Keywords: density functional theory, hyperfine interactions, NMR, orbital ordering, pyrochlores. 1. Introduction
Orbital degrees of freedom and its interplay with lattice and spin ones play the major role in strongly correlated systems and generate the complex electrical and magnetic properties of transition metal oxides.
In the last few years the geometrically frustrated systems have attracted much interest as materials demonstrating new orbital states such as orbital liquid or spin-orbital liquid and so on [1, 2]. Among these systems the rare-earth vanadate pyrochlores (R2V2O7) have provided additional interest, since the V4+ ions, located in the pyrochlore lattice, are the orbital degenerate ions, and its orbital ordering is interesting from the viewpoint of its specific geometrical structure. In addition, some important features of magnetic behavior of vanadate pyrochlores are surprising. For instance, compounds with R = Y, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu are reported to be ferromagnetic insulators as opposed to usually observed the metallic state [3, 4]. Furthermore, Lu2V2O7 and Ho2V2O7 have attracted great interest due to the magnon Hall effect [5, 6].
Our work was initially stimulated by investigations of orbital ordering in transition metal oxides with orbital degeneracy by the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method [7-9]. The NMR spectra are determined by electric quadrupole and magnetic dipole hyperfine interactions. The electric quadrupole hyperfine interaction is the interaction between the nuclear quadrupole moment and electron one, and characterized by the quadrupole frequency. The magnetic hyperfine interaction is the interaction between nuclear and electronic magnetic moments. It contains isotropic and anisotropic terms. The latter depends on the orbital ordering of magnetic ions.
In some cases, for instance, in titanates, where Ti3+ ion is located within the oxygen octahedron, the R-ion displacement effects on the ¿2g-level splitting, and the change of the 3d orbital state of Ti3+ ions is observed [10]. The similar situation can be expected in rare-earth vanadate pyrochlores.
The change of 3d orbital state due to R-ion displacement can favour further changes of the unpaired spin density on magnetic ion nucleus. This effect may occur owing to the interplay between the orbital state of 3d-shell and the local environment distortion. The 3d-shell modification initiates changes of the s-polarization and further changes of the unpaired spin density on nucleus, and, moreover, can give rise to changes of the spin density distribution around nucleus. These effects can influence on isotropic and anisotropic hyperfine interaction values.
There are two approaches to obtain the hyperfine coupling constant. The first one is the ab initio approach, where we optimized the crystal structure of compounds during self-consistent calculation and evaluated the hyperfine coupling constants. The second one is the model approach in the framework of the crystal field theory. Here, i) we analyzed the magnetic hyperfine interaction Hamiltonian leaning upon known orbital structure data and obtained the angular dependences of NMR spectrum under the external magnetic field for each V ion; ii) we could derive the information about hyperfine interaction values leaning upon the experimental data of NMR resonance frequencies [9]. Such calculations have been performed for Lu2V2O7 [11, 12]. We compared data from ab initio and model approaches and found a good agreement between them. It allowed us to conclude that the first-principles calculations are suitable to obtain the information about isotropic and anisotropic hyperfine coupling constants in the absence of NMR experimental data.
So, the aim of present work is to clarify the influence of structure effects and orbital ordering on the magnetic hyperfine field in pyrochlore oxides R2V2O7 (R = Lu, Yb, Tm, Er, Ho) in the absence of experimental values of the NMR resonance frequencies by the detailed ab initio calculations of the hyperfine parameters.
2. Methods
Ab initio calculations
Optimization of the crystal structure and calculations of the hyperfine interaction parameters for R2V2O7 have been carried out by using hybrid functional PBE0 [13, 14] within framework of MO LCAO (molecular orbitals as linear combination of atomic orbitals) approach with the periodic CRYSTAL14 code [15]. Exchange-correlation functional is known to yield better agreement between the calculated and experimental electronic and magnetic properties of solids [16, 17].
The PBE0 functional contains a mixture of exact Hartree-Fock exchange, controlled by a parameter, and DFT exchange-correlation term. Usually a parameter equals 0.25 but it is important to use the Hartree-Fock exchange equaled 1 for calculations of the local hyperfine parameters.
On the first step the self-consistent calculation of the wave functions has been carried out with using the same all-electron Gaussian basis sets for oxygen [18] and vanadium [19] ions for R2V2O7 compounds, and quasi-relativistic effective-core pseudopotentials (ECP) for rare-earth ions, where the 4/-orbitals were replaced by a pseudopotential known as 4/-in-core ECP. The ECPs and corresponding valence basis sets are available at the online repository [20].
On the second step we have used the calculated wave functions to evaluate the isotropic and anisotropic hyperfine coupling constants.
Hyperfine interaction parameters
The magnetic hyperfine interaction Hamiltonian (Hhf ), adopted in this work, couples electron and nuclear magnetic spins, S and I, via [21]
where ^0 is the vacuum susceptibility, ge and gN are the electron and nuclear g-factors, ^n is the nuclear magneton, h is Planck's constant, ps(0) is the electron spin density at the nucleus, Tu are the principal components of the anisotropic hyperfine coupling tensor T, which depends on the electron structure of the system. The T tensor is a second-rank symmetric 3^3 tensor defined as a quadrupole moment of the spin density at V ion position (ps). The T tensor components are defined as
H hf = I • A • S.
(1)
The coupling constant A contains both an isotropic term
(2)
(3)
Tj = Z dr ?W(r)
r ^^ ij 3 j ^x j
UVG
4>va(r)-
(4)
T tensor [21] in this work is calculated using the full spin-polarized density matrix P^va and Bloch basis functions Spin-orbit coupling is not included in the Hamiltonian. The sum over single-electron spins a in Eq. (4) means that the spin S is a spin-half operator in a quantized form of Eq. (1). When A is isotropic with positive diagonal elements ^iso and I and S are spin-half operators, Hhf has a singlet ground state and a triplet excited state lying ^o above the ground state.
The electric hyperfine interaction is characterized by the quadrupole frequency
3eQN\Vzz\
Vq =■
2I (2I - 1)h
(5)
where Qn is the nuclear quadrupole moment, Vzz represents the component of the electric field gradient (EFG) tensor in the principal axes (\Vxx\ < \ Vyy\ < \Vzz\). In general case, the principal axes of T tensor and EFG tensor can be different.
3. Results and discussions
Crystal structure
The pyrochlore R2V2O7 crystallizes into a face centered cubic structure with eight formula units in a unit cell and the Fd3m space group symmetry [22]. The Wyckoff positions and fractional positions of ions in the unit cell are R(16d ) - (0.5, 0.5, 0,5), V(16c) - (0, 0, 0), 0(48/) - (x, 0.125, 0.125), 0'(8b) - (0.375, 0.375, 0.375) respectively.
The crystal structure of rare-earth vanadate pyrochlore is characterized as a three dimensional network of corner-sharing coordination tetrahedra of either R- and V-ions (fig. 1a). The R ions are eight-fold coordinated by oxygen ions and located within distorted cubes (fig. 1b). The V ions are sixfold coordinated by oxygen ions and located within octahedra deformed along C3 axis (fig. 1c). There are two non-equivalent positions of oxygen ions.
At the first step, we have optimized the crystal structures for rare-earth vanadates to investigate the modification of V4+ ion lattice environment due to the R-ions substitution. The results of full geometry optimization of lattice parameters and bond lengths are collected in Table 1.
The calculated lattice parameters are smaller than the experimental ones with a difference about 2%. Therefore, the optimized lattice parameters of R2V2O7 system calculated with PBE0 functional and valence basis set included polarization /-functions describe the crystal structures in good agreement with experiment [23, 24].
Figure 1. (a) Crystal structure of R2V2O7 system; (b) R-ion environment; (c) V-ion environment.
Table 1. Calculated lattice constant, bond-length R-O(48f), bond-length V-O(48f) compared with experimental data: for Ho2V2O7 and E^O7 - [23]; for R2V2O7 with R = Tm, Yb, Lu - [24].
R Lattice parameter (A) R-O(48/) (A) V-O(48/ ) (A)
Calc. Exp. Calc. Exp. Calc. Exp.
Ho 9.843 9.999 2.433 - 1.899 -
Er 9.817 9.998 2.423 - 1.896 -
Tm 9.795 9.973 2.414 2.445 1.894 1.936
Yb 9.770 9.945 2.404 2.438 1.891 1.930
Lu 9.725 9.928 2.389 2.426 1.885 1.931
Figure 2. Calculated lattice constant (a), bond length R-O(48f) (b), and bond length V-O(48f) (c).
In Figure 2 it is shown the decreasing of the lattice parameters in relation to the rare-earth ion, which is according to the lanthanide contraction.
Let us consider the change in the distances R-O and V-O. Distances R-O(48/) and V-O(48/ ) decrease in series R = Ho to Lu as the radius of the lanthanide decreases. The V-O bond length is changed about 0.01 A across the series. The difference is very small to observe some effect of R-ions displacement on the V4+ lattice environment modification. As a result, we cannot expect changes of the orbital ordering across series and therefore we could not obtain any changes of hyperfine interaction constants for all compounds.
Hyperfine interaction_parameters
The nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum is determined by the hyperfine interaction Hamiltonian
HHF = Hel + Hmag . (6)
Here the first term is the electric quadrupole hyperfine interaction Hamiltonian; the second one is the magnetic hyperfine interaction Hamiltonian.
The electrostatic hyperfine interaction is characterized by the quadrupole frequency vq (3). It should be noted that the quadrupole frequency i) decreases in series R = Ho to Lu as the radius of lanthanide decreases; ii) is rather small in comparison with the magnetic hyperfine coupling constants (see fig. 3a). Such small value of the quadrupole frequency is in agreement with the experimental one [9] and the expected one of about 1 MHz for 51V nuclei in a d1 state [25-27]. Therefore, we can conclude that the local properties of 51V nuclei in R2V2O7 system are determined mainly by the magnetic hyperfine interaction.
The magnetic hyperfine interaction is characterized by the isotropic hyperfine coupling constant Aso (2) and the anisotropic hyperfine coupling constant An (3). In this work we have performed ab initio calculations of Aso and An for the 51V nucleus in R2V2O7 system. The results are presented in Figure 3(b,c). The calculations have been performed with making use of the following constant values (in SI system): gN = 1.46837, I = 7/2, Qn = 4x10-26 cm2 [28].
x
£
o
Ho
(a)
Er 0
Tm
Vl> 6
Lu
o
90 89 8 8 87 A'-iim t :i:liu>. pm
« a
1= 64
1 -6i a.« -66
>» E JZ -
•= 1 -<"
(A)
0
Lu
1 Vb
Tm 0
11» O E? O
0
90 89 88 87 ff-ion rucJius, pm
P.A. Agzamova
(C)
90 89 88 87 it-ion radius, pin
Figure 3. Calculated quadrupole frequency (vq) (a), the isotropic hyperfine coupling constant (As>) (b), and the anisotropic hyperfine coupling constant (Aan) (c) for R2V2O7 (R = Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu).
Figure 4. Calculated spin density maps for R2V2O7 system: (a) 2D spin density map plotted in (111) plane (solid line - positive spin density values, dashed line - negative spin density values, dash-dotted line -zero spin density value); (b) 3D spin density map.
The absolute value of the isotropic hyperfine coupling constant decreases in series R = Ho to Lu (see fig. 3b) as the bond lengths V-O(48/) and R-O(48/) decrease (see fig. 2b,c). The isotropic hyperfine interaction depends on the local environment of vanadium ion. Our ab initio calculations showed that the decreasing of R-ions radius leads to slight changes of bond lengths between V4+ ion and surrounding oxygen atoms (see fig. 2c). Therefore, such slight modifications of the vanadium local environment lead to the small changes of the isotropic hyperfine coupling constants about 6 MHz.
The same situation is observed in the case of ab initio calculations of the anisotropic hyperfine coupling constant, where the difference between Aan for Ho2V2O7 and Lu2V2O7 is about 1 MHz (fig. 3c). The anisotropic hyperfine interaction is directly connected with the quadrupole moment of vanadium ion. The latter is the order parameter for orbital degree of freedom. Small changes of anisotropic hyperfine coupling constant in series R = Ho to Lu give us evidence for the absence of significant changes of the orbital ordering in R2V2O7 system.
It is very important to have the information about spin density distribution around 51V nucleus. We can obtain it from the spin density maps. These maps plotted from ab initio calculations are similar in series R = Ho to Lu and presented in Figure 4.
The plotted spin density maps demonstrate dZ2-type (in local coordinate frame) of the spin density distribution around vanadium nucleus that agrees with i) expected type for t2g electronic configuration in octahedral complex, when orbitals are directed along C3-axis; ii) experimental type observed by NMR [9] and neutron polarized diffraction [29] techniques.
In spite of very small changes of the magnetic hyperfine interaction parameters due to small modifications of V-ion environment in R = Ho to Lu series the anisotropy of hyperfine interactions for the vanadium ion nucleus is rather large. Usually the anisotropic hyperfine interaction is very small and neglected at description of nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of 3d-ions. It was shown above that the anisotropic part of magnetic hyperfine interaction depends on orbital degree of freedom directly.
It allows us to conclude that the orbital ordering determines a large anisotropy of magnetic hyperfine fields in R2V2O7. This result agrees with our earlier studies of Lu2V2O7 in the framework of model and ab initio approaches [11, 12] and experimental investigations of Lu2V2O7 by NMR method [9]. At present there are no any experimental and theoretical data for other compounds in R2V2O7 series.
4. Summary
In summary, we can conclude that i) the substitution of R-ions in R2V2O7 system has slight effect on the modification of the V4+ lattice environment; ii) the orbital ordering does not change in R = Ho to Lu series; iii) the orbital ordering dictates a large anisotropy of magnetic hyperfine tensor for R2V2O7 system with R = Lu, Yb, Tm, Er, Ho.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank professor E.V. Mostovshchikova and professor M.I. Kurkin for fruitful discussions. This work was performed using «Uran» supercomputer of IMM UB RAS in the framework of the State Task of the FASO of the Russian Federation (theme "Diagnostics", no. AAAA-A18-118020690196-3) and was supported in part by the RFBR no. 18-32-00690.
References
1. Dun Z.L., Garlea V.O., Yu C., Ren Y., Chou E.S., Zhang H.M., Dong S., Zhou H.D. Phys. Rev. B 89, 235131 (2014)
2. Scoulatos M., Toth S., Roessli B., Enderle M., Stunault F., McIntyre G.J., Tung L.D., Majerrison C., Pomjakushina E., Brown P.J., Khomskii D.I., Ruegg Ch., Kreyssig A., Goldman A.I., Goff J.P. Phys. Rev. B 91, 161104 (2015)
3. Soderholm L., Greedan J.E.Mag. Res. Bull. 17, 707 (1982)
4. Ali Biswas A., Jana Y. JMMM 329, 118 (2013)
5. Onose Y., Ideue T., Katsura H., Shiomi Y., Nagaosa N., Tokura Y. Science 329, 297 (2010)
6. Ideue T., Onose Y., Katsura H., Shiomi I., Ishiwata S., Nagaosa N., Tokura Y. Phys. Rev. B 85, 134441 (2012)
7. Kiyama T., Itoh M. Phys. Rev. B 91, 167202 (2003)
8. Kiyama T., Saitoh H., Itoh M., Kodama K., Ichikawa H., Akimitsu J. J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 74, 1123 (2005)
9. Kiyama T., Shiraoka T., Itoh M., Kano L., Ichikawa H., Akimitsu J. Phys. Rev. B 73, 184422 (2006)
10. Komarek A.C., Roth H., Cwik M., Stein W.-D., Baier J., Kriener M., Bouree F., Lorenz T., Braden M. Phys. Rev. B 75, 224402 (2007)
11. Agzamova P.A., Petrov V.P., Chernyshev V.A., Nikiforov A.E. Low Temp. Phys. 41, 34 (2016)
12. Agzamova P., Nikiforov A., Nazipov D. J. Low Temp. Phys. 185, 544 (2016)
13. Perdew J.P., Ernzerhof M., Burke J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9982 (1996)
14. Adamo C., Barone V. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158 (1999)
15. Dovesi R., Orlando R., Erba A., Zicovich-Wilson C.M., Civalleri B., Casassa S., Maschio L., Ferrabone M., De La Pierre M., D'Arco P., Noel Y., Causa M., Rerat M., Kirtman B. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 1287 (2014)
16. Cora F., Alfredsson M., Mallia G., Middlemiss D.S., Mackrodt W.C., Dovesi R., Orlando R.
Struct. Bond. 113, 171 (2004)
17. Evarestov R.A. Quantum Chemistry of Solids, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2007)
18. Cora F.Mol. Phys. 103, 2483 (2005)
19. Mackrodt W.C., Harrison N.M., Saunders V.R., Allan N.L., Towler M.D., Apra E., Dovesi R. Phylosoph. Mag. A 68, 653 (1993)
20. www.tc.uni-koeln.de/PP/clickpse.en.html
21. Mallia G., Orlando R., Roetti C., Ugliengo P., Dovesi R. Phys. Rev. B 63, 235102 (2011)
22. Gardner J.S., Gingras M.J.P., Greedan J.E. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 53 (2010)
23. Troyanchuk I.O. Inorg. Mater. 26, 182 (1990)
24. Soderholm L., Greedan J.E. Mat. Res. Bull. 17, 707 (1982)
25. Ohama T., Yasuoka H., Isobe M., Ueda Y. J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 66, 3008 (1997)
26. Ohama T., Isobe M., Ueda Y. J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 69, 1574 (2000)
27. Takeda H., Itoh M., Sakurai H. Phys. Rev. B 86, 174405 (2012)
28. Stone N.J. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Table 111-112, 1-28 (2016)
29. Ichikawa H., Kano L., Saitoh M., Miyahara S., Takeda M., Hirota K. J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 74, 1020 (2005)
