CC BY
0УДК 33 Hajyyeva O., Rejepov R.
Hajyyeva O.
Teacher of the Department of Economic management in enterprises Turkmen State Architecture and Construction Institute (Ashgabat, Turkmenistan)
Rejepov R.
Student Faculty of Economics and Management Turkmen State Architecture and Construction Institute (Ashgabat, Turkmenistan)
INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP STYLES ON ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND EMPLOYPERFORMANCE
Аннотация: leadership styles play a critical role in shaping organizational culture and influencing employee performance. Different leadership approaches can create varying work environments, affect employee motivation, and impact overall organizational effectiveness. This article explores the influence of various leadership styles on organizational culture and employee performance, drawing on theoretical perspectives and real-world examples.
Ключевые слова: leadership styles, organizational culture, employee performance, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, servant leadership, democratic leadership, autocratic leadership, laissez-faire.
Leadership styles play a critical role in shaping organizational culture and influencing employee performance. Different leadership approaches can create varying work environments, affect employee motivation, and impact overall organizational effectiveness. This article explores the influence of various leadership styles on organizational culture and employee performance, drawing on theoretical perspectives and real-world examples.
Transformational Leadership. Transformational leadership is characterized by leaders who inspire and motivate employees to exceed their expectations and achieve higher levels of performance. This leadership style focuses on vision, innovation, and change, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and high engagement. Transformational leaders articulate a compelling vision that aligns with the organization's goals and values, inspiring employees to commit to and strive for excellence. Encouraging creativity and innovation by supporting new ideas and rewarding risk-taking fosters a culture of innovation.
Transactional Leadership. Transactional leadership is based on a system of rewards and punishments to manage employee performance. This leadership style is effective in achieving short-term goals and maintaining organizational stability. However, it may not foster long-term employee engagement or innovation. Setting clear expectations and goals for employees and providing rewards for meeting or exceeding these expectations drives performance. Using performance-based incentives such as bonuses, promotions, or recognition programs motivates employees to achieve their targets.
Servant Leadership. Servant leadership focuses on serving the needs of employees and empowering them to reach their full potential. This leadership style emphasizes empathy, active listening, and putting employees' well-being first. Building a supportive and inclusive organizational culture where employees feel valued and respected enhances engagement and job satisfaction. Providing opportunities for professional growth and development helps employees advance their careers and develop new skills.
Democratic Leadership. Democratic leadership, also known as participative leadership, involves employees in decision-making processes. This leadership style fosters a sense of ownership and accountability among employees, as they are actively involved in shaping the direction of the organization. Encouraging employee participation in decision-making processes creates a collaborative and inclusive work environment. Gathering diverse perspectives and ideas from employees helps generate innovative solutions to organizational challenges.
Autocratic Leadership. Autocratic leadership is characterized by leaders who make decisions unilaterally and expect strict compliance from employees. This leadership style can be effective in situations that require quick decision-making and clear direction. Setting clear expectations and providing specific instructions helps ensure that tasks are completed efficiently and accurately. Autocratic leaders closely monitor employee performance and enforce strict adherence to policies and procedures.
Laissez-Faire Leadership. Laissez-faire leadership involves minimal intervention from leaders, allowing employees to take full responsibility for their work. This leadership style is most effective with highly skilled and self-motivated employees who require little supervision. Providing employees with the autonomy to make decisions and manage their tasks fosters a sense of ownership and accountability. Encouraging independent thinking and problem-solving can lead to innovative solutions and high levels of creativity.
However, laissez-faire leadership can lead to a lack of direction and coordination if employees are not adequately supported. Without clear guidance, employees may struggle to align their efforts with organizational goals. Regular check-ins and support from leaders are necessary to ensure that employees remain focused and productive.
Situational Leadership. Situational leadership emphasizes the importance of adapting leadership styles based on the needs of the employees and the situation. Leaders assess the maturity and competence of their employees and adjust their approach accordingly. Providing high levels of support and direction for inexperienced or less confident employees helps build their skills and confidence. As employees gain experience and competence, leaders gradually reduce their level of supervision and encourage more autonomy.
Impact on Organizational Culture. The leadership style adopted by an organization significantly influences its culture. Transformational and democratic leadership styles tend to foster positive, inclusive, and innovative cultures. These environments are characterized by high levels of employee engagement,
collaboration, and a shared commitment to organizational goals. Employees in such cultures are more likely to feel valued and motivated, leading to higher levels of performance and job satisfaction.
Conversely, autocratic and transactional leadership styles may create cultures focused on control and compliance. While these environments can achieve high levels of efficiency and consistency, they may also result in lower levels of employee morale and creativity. Employees in such cultures may feel restricted and undervalued, leading to disengagement and higher turnover rates.
Servant and laissez-faire leadership styles can create cultures that prioritize employee well-being and autonomy. These environments encourage employees to take ownership of their work and contribute to the organization's success. By focusing on employee needs and providing opportunities for growth, these leadership styles can enhance job satisfaction and retention.
Impact on Employee Performance. Leadership styles directly affect employee performance by influencing motivation, job satisfaction, and engagement. Transformational leaders inspire and motivate employees to achieve their best, leading to higher levels of performance and innovation. Employees are more likely to go above and beyond their job requirements when they are inspired by a compelling vision and feel supported by their leaders.
Case Studies. Apple Inc. under Steve Jobs is a prime example of transformational leadership. Jobs's visionary leadership and ability to inspire innovation transformed Apple into one of the most valuable companies in the world. His focus on design, quality, and customer experience created a culture of excellence and continuous improvement. Jobs's ability to articulate a compelling vision and motivate employees to achieve extraordinary results led to groundbreaking products and significant market success.
General Electric (GE) under Jack Welch exemplifies transactional leadership. Welch implemented a rigorous performance management system, rewarding high performers and addressing underperformance. His focus on efficiency, productivity, and accountability drove significant improvements in GE's performance. Welch's
emphasis on clear expectations and performance-based rewards created a high-performing culture that delivered strong financial results.
Southwest Airlines is known for its servant leadership approach. The company's leaders prioritize employee well-being and create a supportive work environment. This focus on employees has resulted in high levels of engagement, job satisfaction, and customer service. Southwest's commitment to servant leadership has contributed to its reputation as a great place to work and a leader in the airline industry.
Google exemplifies democratic leadership by involving employees in decision-making processes. The company's open culture encourages innovation and collaboration. Google provides employees with opportunities to contribute ideas and participate in decisions that affect their work. This inclusive approach has led to high levels of employee engagement, job satisfaction, and innovation.
Walmart under Sam Walton is an example of autocratic leadership. Walton's hands-on approach and strict adherence to policies and procedures drove the company's rapid growth. While this leadership style achieved high levels of efficiency and control, it also faced criticism for its impact on employee morale and creativity. Walton's focus on cost control and operational efficiency led to significant business success.
3M's innovation culture is supported by laissez-faire leadership. The company's leaders provide employees with the freedom to explore new ideas and take risks. This autonomy has led to numerous innovations and a strong track record of successful products. 3M's commitment to fostering a creative and entrepreneurial environment has driven its reputation as an innovation leader.
Future Prospects. The future of leadership will likely see a blend of styles to address the dynamic needs of organizations and employees. As the workforce becomes more diverse and global, leaders will need to be more adaptable and culturally aware. Emphasizing emotional intelligence and the ability to connect with and understand employees will be crucial for effective leadership.
Advancements in technology will also shape leadership practices. Leaders will need to leverage digital tools and data analytics to make informed decisions and manage remote teams. The ability to lead virtual teams and create a cohesive organizational culture in a digital environment will be increasingly important.
The growing emphasis on sustainability and social responsibility will influence leadership styles. Leaders will need to prioritize ethical practices, environmental stewardship, and social impact. Developing transparent and accountable leadership approaches will be essential for building trust and achieving long-term success.
Leadership styles have a profound impact on organizational culture and employee performance. Transformational, transactional, servant, democratic, autocratic, laissez-faire, and situational leadership styles each have unique effects on how organizations function and how employees perform. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each style, leaders can adopt the most appropriate approach for their specific context and goals. The future of leadership will require adaptability, emotional intelligence, and a commitment to sustainability and social responsibility to navigate the evolving challenges and opportunities in the business landscape.
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ:
1. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Psychology Press;
2. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row;
3. Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications;
4. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson Education;
5. Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Paulist Press;
6. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books;
7. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press
