Научная статья на тему 'Inactivation of Microorganisms and Potato Tuber Moth Eggs and Pupae Using a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma'

Inactivation of Microorganisms and Potato Tuber Moth Eggs and Pupae Using a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Текст научной статьи по специальности «Биологические науки»

CC BY
24
1
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
Dielectric barrier discharge / atmospheric pressure plasma in helium / non-thermal plasma / bacteria / bacterial spores / fungi inactivation / potato tuber moth

Аннотация научной статьи по биологическим наукам, автор научной работы — Sharif Al-Hawat, George Saour, Ayman Al-Mariri

A dielectric barrier discharge plasma device (DBD) was built, characterized and operated. Ten species of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungus and spores of Bacillus cereus and its vegetative cells, in addition to eggs and pupae of the potato tuber moth (PTM) were exposed to DBD plasma. A strong detrimental effect on the exposed species was observed in function to the exposure time at helium: air ratio 98:2, electrode gap 1.8 cm, amplitude of discharge voltage 6 kV and an effective power density 208 mW/cm3.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Inactivation of Microorganisms and Potato Tuber Moth Eggs and Pupae Using a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma»

Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2024, pp. 107-113 ISSN 1997-0838 Original Text Copyright © 2024 by Al-Hawat, Saour and Al-Mariri

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Inactivation of Microorganisms and Potato Tuber Moth Eggs and Pupae Using a Dielectric Barrier Discharge

Plasma

Sharif Al-Hawat 1, George Saour 2, Ayman Al-Mariri 2

1 Department of Physics, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria. AECS, P.O Box 6091, Damascus, Syria

2 Department of Biotechnology, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria. AECS, P.O Box 6091, Damascus, Syria

*E-Mail: pscientific20@aec.org.sy

Received February 18, 2024

A dielectric barrier discharge plasma device (DBD) was built, characterized and operated. Ten species of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungus and spores of Bacillus cereus and its vegetative cells, in addition to eggs and pupae of the potato tuber moth (PTM) were exposed to DBD plasma. A strong detrimental effect on the exposed species was observed in function to the exposure time at helium: air ratio 98:2, electrode gap 1.8 cm, amplitude of discharge voltage 6 kV and an effective power density 208 mW/cm3. The outcome of this work provides valuable data on the use of DBD plasma as an alternative non-heating sterilization method to kill or inhibit microbial growth and protecting potatoes from PTM infestation.

Key words: Dielectric barrier discharge, atmospheric pressure plasma in helium, nonthermal plasma, bacteria, bacterial spores, fungi inactivation, potato tuber moth

OPEN

8

ACCESS

In the recent decades, the dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma has achieved great scientific and technological advances, because of its unique properties that make it a useful tool in many different applications such as surface sterilization in food processing industries, destruction of pathogens, modification of packaging materials for enhancing self-life (Hati et al., 2018). In this context, many researches were carried out, to understand the physical principle of the DBD that consists of uniform diffuse glows covering the entire electrode surfaces (Brandenburg, 2017, Maccaferri et al., 2023).

The DBD plasma is characterized by its low temperature comparable with the room temperature, unremarkable heating effect on treaded materials like food or living tissues, low energy consumption, and not generating excessively chemically active particles or ionizing radiation, making it ideal for bacterial inactivation, sterilization and agricultural pests control (Sutar et al., 2021; Harikrishna et al., 2023).

For instance, DBD plasma has been used against the entophytic bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens and E. coli (Croteau et al., 2022; Ukhtiyah et al., 2023). Moreover, inactivation for gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria was also obtained in a gap of air by igniting diffuse homogenous discharge of DBD (Motrescu et al., 2015; Cong et al., 2020).

The effects of air plasma treatments on the inactivation of pure bacterial culture (Escherichia coli) deposited onto the surface of agar plates were investigated. A significant reduction for E. coli activity was achieved within 60 s of plasma treatment. This result can be related to the presence of reactive species in the plasma volume, in particular, O and N radicals (Pedroni et al., 2018).

The DBD was proven to be an effective method to control many insect pests such as the bruchid Callosobruchus chinensis and the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Pathan et al., 2021; Zilli et al., 2022). Moreover, the Effects of non-thermal plasma treatment on plant materials (vegetable leaves, or crops), seed germination and early growth of

leguminous plants were also studied (Zhang et al., 2018). It was proven that DBD plasma could be used as a new and effective treating method in surface microbial inactivation and seed stimulation useable in the agricultural and food industries (Sera et al., 2021). For example, a positive effect on the germination and seedling growth of radish Raphanus sativus was observed when the seeds were treated with the DBD (Guragain et al., 2022).

Thus, this work aims to use a DBD device in treatment of microorganisms including: bacterial species of Salmonella typhi, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris, Brucella melitensis (gramnegative bacteria), Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis, (gram-positive bacteria), Bacillus cereus strain as spores, fungus species as Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger, and the potato tuber moth (PTM), Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) eggs and pupae under different exposure times.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Construction of the DBD Device

A plasma device type of DBD was constructed according to (Bures et al., 2006). The parameters of the constructed DBD device in proper operational conditions are presented in Table 1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

Both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, two fungal species and spores were challenged with the DBD plasma. All isolates used in the current study belonged to the pure culture collection of our Microbiology and Immunology Division.

The bacterial strains as S. typhi, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, P. vulgaris, B. melitensis, S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, S. pneumoniae, E. faecalis and B. cereus were cultured on 2xYT agar plates (Difco, BD, Sparks, USA) and incubated under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24 h. The fungus strains as C. albicans and A. niger were cultured on Potato Dextrose agar (PDA, Titan Biotech, India) and incubated under aerobic conditions at 30 °C for 5 days. Afterwards, a single colony was inoculated into Luria Bertani medium (LB Broth, Bio

Basic Inc., Canada) and grown at 37 °C for 24 h with shaking at 150 rpm.

The bacterial and fungal cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5400 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C and washed three times with sterilized phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) then the final pellets were re-suspended in PBS.

The microorganisms' cells were adjusted to 1 x 109 CFU/ml by measuring optical density (OD) at 600 nm with a spectrophotometer (0D600, BioQuest, CE2502, England), viable count of the bacterial suspensions were checked by culturing 10 |l of them on Luria Bertani medium (LB agar, Bio Basic Inc., Canada). The standard Nichrome wire loops are available in 6 sizes from 1 |l to 10 |l which mean this volume is enough for culturing in plates. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the number of CFU determined and results were expressed in Log^ CFU/ml.

The sterile Whatman qualitative filter paper discs (Grade 113, Zelpa, Belgium) with a reported pore size of 30 |m and a thickness of 0.33 mm were used. The filter paper discs were impregnated with the final suspensions (1 x 109 CFU/ml) of each bacterial and fungal sample. The impregnated paper discs were treated for each strain by exposing each paper disc to DBD plasma from 5 to 60 min as indicated in Table 2 respectively. The treated paper discs were then placed in a sterile PBS and left for an hour. Then all treated filter paper discs with controls were re-cultured on 2xYT plates for the bacterial samples and on PDA agar for the fungal samples. The results were determined by the bacterial growth or growth inhibition on the media plates.

Treatment of P. operculella Eggs and Pupae

Newly emerged P. operculella adults were collected and confined in 800 ml transparent plastic jars (10-12 pairs in each jar). A band of filter paper was added to the bottom of each jar for oviposition and 10% sucrose solution was presented as a food source. Eggs on filter paper bands were removed, counted by using a stereoscopic microscope.

Eggs aged 48 h (n = 2360) deposited on sterile filter paper were exposed to plasma for durations of 30 and 60 min. The control eggs were placed during the

exposure time inside the discharge chamber outside the discharge. After treatment, eggs were incubated at 25 °C and 60% relative humidity (RH) until hatching (= 5 days), after which the percentage of hatched and unhatched eggs was determined. Egg mortality values were adjusted for control mortality according to Schneider-Orelli's formula (Krosche et al., 1996):

M % = (b - k /100 - k ) x100

Where M % is a percent corrected mortality, b is a percent mortality (unhatched eggs) in the treatment, and k is a percent of mortality in the control. The experiment was replicated 3 times with = 780 eggs per replicate.

Pupae of P. operculella at the age of 3 days old (n = 270) were exposed to discharge plasma for durations 30 and 60 min. The control was left inside the discharge chamber outside the discharge. The treated and untreated pupae were held at 25 °C until adult moth's emergence. The percentage of emerged moth was determined. The bioassay was replicated 3 times, with 90 pupae per replicate.

Statistical analysis was performed using State-view program at the 5% level (P < 0.05). Numerical data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of (ANOVA) variance followed by Fisher's protected least significant difference test, (PLSD) were carried out for all possible mean comparisons.

RESULTS

Effects of DBD plasma on bacterial, fungal and spores culture

Under conditions mentioned in Table 1 (with dg=1.8 cm, He:Air=98:2, effective power density=208 mW/cm3), gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, fungus and spores, PTM eggs and pupae were treated.

Our results revealed that, a total absence of growth at all times of exposure was recorded for P. aeruginosa and E. faecalis. The growth of E. coli and P. vulgaris was inhibited after treatment with DBD at time 15 min; no growth was observed after exposure to 30 min for S. typhi, B. melitensis, S. aureus, L. monocytogenes and S. pneumonia. Growth of C. albicans fungus was negatively affected at 30 min of exposure to DBD, while growth of A. niger, B. cereus spores and vegetative cells germination were inhibited at 60 min of DBD treatment

(Table 2).

Effects of DBD plasma on PTM eggs and pupae

There was a high proportion of eggs that did not hatch due to DBD treatment (F = 113.5; df = 2, 17; P = 0.0001), the mean percentage of eggs hatch in the control was 80.8% and decreased to 65.7 and 55.5% in 30 and 60 min treatments, respectively (See Table 3).

Table 1: Electrical and operational parameters of constructed

The DBD treatment has a significant negative impact on PTM adult emergence (F = 4325; df = 2, 89; P = 0.0001). The percentage of emerged adults from 3-d-old pupae subjected to DBD sharply decreased with the increase of exposure time from 0 to 30 and 60 min, respectively. Adult emergence was completely inhibited after exposure to 60 min (Table 4).

DBD device working on helium: air mixture.

Parameters Value

Amplitude of discharge voltage,U0 6 kV

Amplitude of discharge current 40 mA

Effective Power: Prms 120 W

Effective discharge power density 208 mW/cm3

Gap distance, dg 1.8 cm

Working gas at atmospheric pressure 98 He: 2 Air

Working frequency, f 5 kHz

Surface area 320 cm2 (16 x20 cm)

Flow rate of helium 20 sccm (20 cm3/min)

Dielectric matter Garolite G-7 (0.8 mm)

Dielectric constant of G-7 £=4.2

Electrode matter Al alloy

Temperature of cooling water 5 oC

Ambient temperature of discharge 14 oC

Table 2: Bacterial, fungal and spores growth (+) or inactivation (-) after treatment with DBD plasma at different exposure times for 1 x 109 CFU/ml.

Treatment time of microorganisms, min

5

10

15

30

45

60

Gram-negative bacteria

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Escherichia coli Proteus vulgaris Salmonella typhi Brucella melitensis Gram-positive bacteria

Enterococcus faecalis Staphylococcus aureus Listeria monocytogenes Streptococcus pneumoniae Fungus

Candida albicans Aspergillus niger Bacillus cereus Spores

Vegetative cells

+ + + + + + +

+ + + +

+ + + + + + +

+ +

+

+

Table 3: Mean percentage ± SD of eggs hatch of potato tuber moth subjected to DBD plasma.

Exposure period No. of eggs Mean % eggs Corrected % of

min hatch unhatched eggs

0 751 80.8 ± 4.1a -

30 795 65.7 ± 3.8b 29.8

60 814 55.5 ± 3.9c 31.3

Mean in column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Fisher PLSD). Mean of 3 replicates,

780 eggs per replicate.

Table 4: Mean percentage ± SD of adult emergence of potato tuber moth subjected as pupae to DBD plasma.

Exposure period No. of pupae Mean % emerged

min moths

0 90 85.9 ± 4.9a

30 90 26.7 ± 5.9b

60 90 0.0 ± 0.0c

Mean in column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05, Fisher PLSD). Mean of 3 replicates, 90 pupae per replicate.

DISCUSSION

Our DBD device was built and characterized, in order to obtain stable plasma of glow discharge in helium at atmospheric pressure, for treating microorganisms, eggs and pupae of the PTM under conditions indicated in Table 1.

The inactivation of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria after exposure to DBD plasma was detected for P. aeruginosa and E. faecalis at 5 min; E. coli and P. vulgaris at 15 min; others bacteria species and fungus of C. albicans at 30 min (Table 2). Several mechanisms could be involved to explain the detrimental effects of DBD plasma on microorganisms. One mechanism pretends that plasma effects on bacteria are attributed to existence of very important role of charged particles in tearing off the outer membrane of the bacterial cells (Ricchiuto et al., 2021). Therefore, the sensitivity to DBD between gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria found in our results could be attributed to the fact that gram-negative contains a layer of murein (peptidoglycan) thinner than that found in gram-positive bacteria and therefore gram-positive bacteria, which have a thicker murein layer, are more resistant to DBD plasma (Motrescu et al., 2015; Figueroa-Pinochet et al., 2022).

Another mechanism considers UV radiation effect on bacteria; several researches (Ghomi et al., 2012; Bourke

et al., 2017) indicated that UV radiation could play a role in the killing mechanism of bacteria (UV radiation disables cells if their wavelength range is located between 220 nm and 280 nm). However, the generated plasma used in our work could have a weak effect in killing bacteria due to the existence of two wavelengths in our recorded spectrum (313.6-391.44 nm, data not shown), which belongs to the middle UV-B region, they are 313.6 nm and 315.9 nm lines.

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

The third mechanism takes into account that, the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) in DBD devices working on atmospheric air might play a dominant role in the process of disrupting bacteria (Pedroni et al., 2018). For example, ROS are supposed to be capable to oxidize the cell membrane, and then damage the protein and DNA inside the cells.

Our study showed that A. niger fungus, B. cereus spores and vegetative cells were resistant to DBD plasma (60 min of exposure) as shown in Table 2. This could be attributed to the operational parameters of our DBD treatment at 6 kV as amplitude of discharge voltage. Since, Zahi et al. (2023) found that 4 min was adequate for the reduction of survival Penicillium expansum spores in kiwi-fruit juice after DBD plasma treatment at 18 kV.

CONCLUSION

Encouraging results were obtained in inactivation of

a set of 10 bacterial species by using DBD plasma. For instance, the exposure period to DBD did not exceed 5 min for S. typhi (gram-negative bacteria) and L. monocytogenes (gram-positive bacteria).

Thus, DBD plasma could be used to eliminate or destruct microorganism from the contaminated surfaces (sterilization) or for microbiological decontamination such as the pathogenic bacteria B. cereus.

Treatment results by DBD against P. operculella are interesting since 100% of pupae mortality was recorded after exposure to 60 min, noting that infested potato tubers could contain PTM eggs and pupae.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to thank the general director of Atomic Energy Commission of Syria for encouragement and material support of this work, also thanks to all staff who helped in construction of DBD device and analysis of the treated samples.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

Bourke, P., Ziuzina, D., Han, L., Cullen, P. J., Gilmore, B.F. (2017). Microbiological interactions with cold plasma. Journal of Applied Microbiology 123, 308324.

Brandenburg, R. (2017). Dielectric barrier discharges: progress on plasma sources and on the understanding regimes and single filaments, Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 26(5): (pp29) D0I:10.1088/1361-6595/aa6426

Bures, B. L., Donohue, K. V., Roe R. M. and Bourham, M. A. (2006). Nonchemical dielectric barrier discharge treatment as a method of insect control, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 34(1):55-62. DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2005.863595

Cong, L., M. Huang, J. Zhang, and W. Yan. (15 Aug. 2020). Effect of dielectric barrier discharge plasma on the degradation of malathion and chlorpyrifos on lettuce, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 101(2): 424-432. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10651.

Croteau A., White, A., Cornell, K. A. Browning , J.

(2022). Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Device Exhibits Etching Effects on Bacterial Biofilms. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 6: 619-625.

Figueroa-Pinochet, M. F., Castro-Alija, M. J., Tiwari, B. K., Jiménez, J. M. López-Vallecillo, M., Cao, M. J., Albertos, I. (2022). Dielectric Barrier Discharge for Solid Food Applications. Nutrients. 14: 4653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ nu14214653

Ghomi, H., Mohades, S., Navab Safa, N., Dabiri, H. (2012). Surface decontamination by dielectric barrier discharge plasma. J Biomed Phys. Eng. 2(2),72-76.

Guragain , R. P., Baniya, H. B., Dhungana, S., Chhetri, G. K., Sedhai, B., Basnet, N., Sakaya Aavash, B. P., Pandey, Pradhan, S. P., Joshi, U. M. and Subedi, D. P. (2022). Effect of plasma treatment on the seed germination and seedling growth of radish (Raphanus Sativus), Plasma Sci. Technol., 24(1), 015502, DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/ac3476 Harikrishna, S., Anil, P. P., Shams, R., Dash K. K.

(2023). Cold plasma as an emerging nonthermal technology for food processing: A comprehensive review, J. Agric. and Food Res. 14 (2023) 100747

Hassan, A. M., Sileem, T. M., & Hassan, R. S. (2019). Verification of atmospheric plasma irradiation as an alternative control method for Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Brazilian Journal of Biology, 80, 673-679.

Hati, S., Patel, M., & Yadav, D. (2018). Food bioprocessing by non-thermal plasma technology. Current Opinion in Food Science, 19, 85-91. Kirk-Bradley, N. T., Salau, T. G., Salzman, K. Z., Moore, J. M. (2022). Atmospheric cold plasma (ACP) treatment for efficient disinfestation of the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus. Journal of the ASABE 66: 921-927 (doi: 10.13031/ja.15449).

Krosche, J., Koch, W. (March 1996). Studies on the use of chemicals, botanicals and Bacillus thuringiensis in the management of the potato tuber moth in potato stores, Crop Protection, 15 (2):197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(95)00126-3

Maccaferri, C., Saiz-Garcia, A., Capelli, F., Gherardi, M., Alba-Elias, F., Laurita, R., (2023) Evaluation of the

Antimicrobal Efficacy of a Large-Area Surface Dielectric Barrier Disharge on Food contact Surfaces, Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing 43: 1773-1790,

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-023-10410-2 Motrescu, I., Poiata, A., Nastuta, A. V., Creanga, D., Popa. G. (2015). Bioeffects of atmospheric plasma discharge on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Science and Arts, 15(3), 249256.

Pathan, F. L., Deshmukh, R. R. Annapure. U. S. (2021). Potential of cold plasma to control Callosobruchus chinensis (Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) in chickpea cultivars during four year storage, Scientific Reports 11: 13425. Pedroni, M., Morandi S., Silvetti, T., Cremona, A., Gittini, G., Nardone A., Pallotta F., Brasca M.and Vassallo. E. (2018). Bacteria inactivation by atmospheric pressure plasma jet treatment, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, 36 (1): (pp7). https: //doi.org/10.1116/1.4995546

Ricchiuto A. C., Borghi, C.A., Cristofolini, A., Neretti, G. (2021). Atmospheric-pressure plasma actuators: Enhancement of the free charges' transport mechanism. Plasma Process Polym. 2021; e2000214, https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202000214 Será, B., Scholtz, V., Jiresová, J., Khun, .J., Julák J. and Sery, M. (2021). Effects of non-thermal plasma treatment on seed germination and early growth of leguminous plants- A review, Plants, 10(8), 1616. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081616 Sutar, S. A., Thirumdas, R., Chaudhari, B. B., Deshmukh R. R.and Annapure. U. S. (May 2021). Effect of cold plasma on insect infestation and

keeping quality of stored wheat flour, Journal of Stored Products Research, 92: (pp7), 101774 https://doi.org/10.1016/jjspr.2021.101774

Ukhtiyah, H., Kusumandari, K. Saraswati T. E. (2023). Effect of Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) plasma treatment in drinking water on physical, chemical, and biological parameters, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2498 (2023) 012017 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2498/1/012017

Zhai, Y., Sun, J., Ye, S. Wang, Y. Tian, J., Bai, Y., Xiang, Q., Shen, R. (2023). Principal antifungal factors and underlying mechanisms of dielectric barrier discharge plasma against Penicillium expansum spores as well as its application in kiwi-fruit juice, LWT 185 (2023) 115089, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115089

Zhang, J. J., Kwon, T., S. B. Kim, D. K. Jeong. (2018). Plasma farming: Non-Thermal dielectric barrier discharge plasma technology for improving the growth of soybean sprouts and chickens. Plasma, 1, 285-296; doi:10.3390/plasma1020025

Zilli, C., Pedrini, N. Prieto, E., Girotti, J. R., Vallecorsa, P., Ferreyra, M., Chamorro, J. C. , Cejas, E., Fina, B., Prevosto, L., Balestrasse, K. (2022). Non-thermal plasma as emerging technology for Tribolium castaneum pest-management in stored grains and flours, Journal of Stored Products Research 99, 102031

Ziuzina, D., van Cleynenbreugel, R., Tersaruolo, C., & Bourke, P. (2021). Cold plasma for insect pest control: Tribolium castaneum mortality and defense mechanisms in response to treatment. Plasma Process. Polym., 18(10), 2000178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.202000178

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.