Научная статья на тему 'IN THE WORLD REFUSES TO USE FACE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY'

IN THE WORLD REFUSES TO USE FACE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY Текст научной статьи по специальности «Строительство и архитектура»

CC BY
183
17
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
Guru Sessions / Dell / Internet of things / Brian Reaves / Internet

Аннотация научной статьи по строительству и архитектуре, автор научной работы — Kodirov E., Turgunov B., Muxammadjonov X.

The article provides an overview of the development of facial recognition in near futures which is crowded in our globalization world.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «IN THE WORLD REFUSES TO USE FACE RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY»

UDK 004

Kodirov E., assistant teacher Turgunov B., student Muxammadjonov X., student Fergana branch of Tashkent University of Information Technology

Fergana city, Uzbekistan IN THE WORLD REFUSES TO USE FACE RECOGNITION

TECHNOLOGY

Annotation. The article provides an overview of the development of facial recognition in near futures which is crowded in our globalization world

Keywords: Guru Sessions, Dell, Internet of things, Brian Reaves, Internet.

The city authorities of San Francisco (San Francisco, California, USA) banned police and other government agencies from using face recognition solutions, as well as information from outside (commercial) organizations obtained using recognition technology. The ban will complicate the work of the police to investigate crimes and to ensure security in places with a large number of people. But civil liberty activists feared that state bodies might abuse biometric information, expressed reluctance to allow total government intrusion into private life, and also feared that the United States could take the "Chinese way" by restricting the rights of its citizens based on total observation data.

According to the publication The New York Times, the initiator of the ban was the District Council (Board of Supervisors). Thus, San Francisco became the first of the major US cities to block the use of facial recognition technology for government purposes.

Local police authorities protested against the ban. In recent years, it was face recognition technology that helped the police investigate crimes and search for both petty fraudsters and mass murder perpetrators. For example, it was with her help that the police were able to identify a suspect who attacked the Capital Gazette edition in Annapolis (Annapolis, Maryland) in June last year and who shot journalists with a shotgun.

"Мировая наука" №9(30) 2019

science-j.com

In one form or another, biometric technology is used in many local and international American air and sea ports (for the operation of the United States Border Guard Service (United States Customs and Border Protection), in large stadiums, near police departments in Las Vegas, Orlando, San Jose, San Diego, New York, Boston, Detroit and so on, at the Colorado Department of Public Safety (Colorado Department of Public Safety), at the Florida Pinellas County Sheriff's Office in Florida, at the Ministry California Department of Justice and Police State of Virginia (Virginia State Police). According to Alvaro Bedoya, director of the Georgetown University Privacy and Technology Center, more than 30 states allow local or state governments or the FBI to search using biometrics technology photographs of driver's licenses, conducting a search or verification of suspects in the crime.

Biometric information in the form of scanned fingerprints and photographs are also used by local homeless shelters, thus tracking citizens without documents.

"It's hard to deny that this technology is valuable for public safety and security for airports and border facilities," comments Jonathan Turley, an expert on constitutional law at George Washington University. Instead of focusing on bans, the city should develop rules that recognize the usefulness of a face recognition system.

However, against the use of face recognition technology for the needs of state bodies, American activists for the protection of civil liberties and rights sharply spoke. The first argument with which they operated was their unwillingness to allow a state's total invasion of the privacy of its citizens, making, in fact, each of them the object of government surveillance and jeopardizing civil rights and freedoms. For example, according to Matt Cagle, a lawyer from A.C.L.U. Northern California (A.C.L.U. of Northern California), technology provides the government with an unprecedented opportunity to track people engaged in their daily lives. It is incompatible with healthy democracy. The initiative of the San Francisco authorities, in his opinion, is indeed promising and seeks to prevent the use of this dangerous technology against the public.

As Viktor Dostov, chairman of the Electronic Money Association, an FATF expert, commented on the representatives of the Russian media, practice shows that the effectiveness of detecting criminals using cameras is very low. But there is one more minus - the total destruction of the privacy segment associated with human movement. Nobody wants all his movements to be constantly monitored by government agencies, not to mention the existence of a certain probability that this information will fall into the wrong hands. Against the background of the increasing scandals with data leakage of providers, the story of the ban in San Francisco sharpens a general discussion on the issue of preserving personal data.

According to Vladislav Arkhipov, Ph.D. in Law, associate professor at St. Petersburg State University, head of the working group of the to determine approaches to the problem of personal data protection, the decision of the San Francisco authorities is a political choice. US representatives oppose their concept of the Chinese model, in which face recognition technology is used for monitoring

"MnpoBaH HayKa" №9(30) 2019 science-j.com

citizens' behavior, the results of which can be used in determining the scope of rights, including in connection with the "social credit" system.

According to The New York Times, after San Francisco, similar bans intend to introduce the authorities of Oakland (Oakland, California) and Somerville (Somerville, Massachusetts). In addition, a bill introduced a few weeks ago to the US Congress will prohibit commercial users of face recognition technology from collecting and exchanging data to identify or track consumers without their consent.

LITERATURE:

1. Khaing M. Improving the reliability of low-mobility connections of parts of aircraft engines subject to the influence of fretting corrosion: Diss. ... cand. tech. sciences. - M., 2015. - 140 p.

2. Fretting damage in Incoloy® 800 tubes against different support materials / S.R.Soria, J.P. Balbiani, M. Bergant, A. Tolley, A. Yawny // Procedia Materials Science. - 2015. -№ 9. - p. 538-547.

"Мировая наука" №9(30) 2019

science-j.com

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.