CC BY
8
УДК 316.334
Chalaboeva Z.M.
teacher
department of Biological Chemistry Andijan State Medical Institute
HUMAN NATURE: HUMAN RESERVE OPPORTUNITIES
Annotation: This article discusses the place of man in nature. The human potential in the field of nature protection is analyzed.
Key words: man, nature, worldview, society.
The nature of man is trying to protect himself from the destructive consequences of cultural achievements, as a rational steward of which a person remains insolvent to this day, and she implicitly (past his will and consciousness) solves this problem by her own methods Meanwhile, as a generally accepted alternative to environmental disaster in the existing literature, various concepts of social transformations are still proposed, the result of which would be the formation of a "new world consciousness", a "new ethics", a new attitude to nature, based not on struggle and domination, but on harmony, "a sense of identity with future generations of people", etc. The idea of creating a New Society and a New Man is still popular in this area.
The most constructive and realistic position, in my opinion, is presented in the concept of E. Fromm, which is set out in his books "To have or to be", "Escape from freedom"; it completely coincides with the ideological basis of this installation. He emphasizes that environmental problems cannot be solved without a radical transformation of the human nature, without changing the motivation system. At the same time, he criticizes these views, we call abstractly mechanical the desire to solve the problem without considering the political, social and psychological factors that stand in the way of any changes. "It is useless to point out the general trend of necessary changes," he writes, "if this is not accompanied by a serious attempt to consider the real obstacles that stand in the way of the implementation of all their proposals" .Fromm's works, being, in essence, a comprehensive study of these obstacles in various aspects, fulfill his assigned task. However, some abstractness is still preserved. The results of the study also hang in the air at this stage, as if we confine ourselves to identifying obstacles and at the same time do not find out how much they are really surmountable in the context of a specific social reality. In fact, as Fromm himself emphasizes, the creation of a new society and a new person is possible only if the old motivations for profit and power gain are replaced by a new one, namely, to be, give and understand; if the market character is replaced by a productive, loving character, and the cybernetic religion is replaced by a new, radical humanist spirit.
Can all this be realized? By what means, and does humanity have any hope of solving this problem? And Fromm believes that the chances that the necessary changes will take place in man and society are very small. "It's hard to believe," he
writes, "that no serious effort is being made to avoid what looks like a final sentence of fate. While in his personal life only a madman can remain passive in the face of a danger threatening his existence, those who are clothed with state power do practically nothing to prevent this danger, and those who have entrusted their fate to them allow them to remain in inaction ". Fromm suggests that the explanation for this can be found in the fact that endless conferences, resolutions, negotiations lull the consciousness and desire to survive both leaders and leaders, creating the appearance that the path to salvation is known and that they are on the right path, although no serious changes do not actually occur, i.e. there is a peculiar "magic of decision making", for the execution of which no one is responsible.
He connects the second possible solution with the psychological structure of both leaders and ordinary members of society, generated by the system itself. No one is shocked anymore, he notes that leading politicians and businessmen are able to put personal success above public debt and make decisions that serve their personal benefit, but are harmful and dangerous to society. "At the same time, ordinary members of society are equally selfishly absorbed in their own affairs and hardly pay attention to anything that goes beyond their own narrow little world", and if they realize the seriousness of the situation, then the necessary changes in lifestyle should be so radical that people "prefer to live under the threat of a future catastrophe than to make today the sacrifices that these changes would require". Apparently, it would not be out of place to mention the degree of mystification of the consciousness of most people underlined by the American publicist S. N. Parkinson with respect to the totality of existing power structures; he writes that, in fact, the "advice of the noble sages" exists only in the imagination, and only "for teenagers, teachers and authors of manuals on the history of government institutions it continues to seem that the world is comparatively intelligent".
And the last of the explanations given by Fromm, which exists "in addition to explanations of the fatal passivity of a person in matters of life and death" and to which he most likely gives a decisive significance, is that by no alternative models of corporate capitalism, social-democratic or Soviet socialism or the technocratic "fascism with a smiling face" we currently do not have. At the end of the book "To have or to be?" he cites his own alternative model of "a new united humanity living in a brotherhood and a world free from economic determination, from wars and class struggle", but he treats it like a utopia and sees no other way out than "the attractive force of new ideas" ", Which can hardly b e regarded as a real way out - rather, it looks like the last hope of a doomed. Probably, not all the provisions of E. Fromm's concept can be agreed today, however, some conclusions can be drawn as a result of its analysis. First of all, the indisputability of the very ideological basis should be noted: the universally recognized need to change the internal nature of man is indeed an alternative ecological disaster.
'^KOHOMHKa h ^HyMM №3(70) 2020
www.iupr.ru
26
Sources used:
1. Дольник В.Р. Непослушное дитя биосферы. М.,1994, c. 170-188.
2. Фромм Э. Иметь или быть. М..1990. с.18-20; 169-209.
3. Uroqova, O. J. (2018). CHULPANS PROBLEMS OF EMANCIPATION OF PEOPLE CREATIVE WORK. Теория и практика современной науки, (1), 64-67.
4. Uroqova, O. J. (2019). CHULPON'S TRANSLATION ACTIVITIES. Экономика и социум, (9), 35-36.
5. Urakova, O. J. (2019). The philosophical and aesthetic meaning of abdulhamid chulpan's idea of «if literature is alive, so nation will live. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR), <5(4), 179-184.
