CC BY
34PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS
HOW TO CREATE A HUMAN SUPER CIVILIZATION7
Antonov A.
PhD, HonDSc, HonDL, H.ProfSci, ResProf Independent researcher, Kiev, Ukraine
ABSTRACT
The article proves that the existing version of the special theory of relativity (STR), based on the postulated principle of non-exceeding the speed of light, is incorrect. Therefore, an alternative version of STR, based on the experimentally proven principle of the physical reality of imaginary numbers, is proposed. And from the alternative version of STR follows the existence of invisible universes with their own super-civilizations. Therefore, attempts to establish contacts with extraterrestrial super-civilizations of our visible universe as a result of flights to the Moon and Mars or as a result of the detection of their activity in other star systems thousands of light years from Earth are unnecessary, since the inhabitants of super-civilizations are also on Earth. They even send us messages, for example in the form of so-called 'crop circles'. But since we were not intellectually advanced enough to read these messages, our human civilization did not interest them. And any of our contacts with them, apart from their desire, are impossible. Therefore, the way out of this situation is to transform the existing human civilization into super-civilization through the creation and use of human-computer super-intelligence.
Keywords: imaginary numbers, special theory of relativity, dark matter, dark energy, dark space, invisible universes, Multiverse, Hyperverse, super-civilization, super-intelligence, technological singularity
1. Introduction
Established at the beginning of the last century by Joseph Larmor [1], the Nobel Prize winner Hendrik Antoon Lorentz [2], Jules Henri Poincare [3], the winner of the Nobel Prize Albert Einstein [4] and other eminent scientists, special theory of relativity (STR) [5] -[7] is nevertheless flawed despite all of its universally recognized merits. Its second postulate [8] undergoes especially a lot of criticism, having in addition to offered original formulation [4] in the form of principle of the constant velocity of light, the other supposedly identical to or following from it (that was not proved anywhere) formulations in the form of the principle of non-exceeding the speed of light and approval of the physical unreality of the imaginary numbers.
Since modern physics is largely founded not on experimentally obtained data, but on those or other postulates, the corresponding theories can be refuted only by means of experiments. And so in the early twenty-first century attempts of refutation of the principle of non-exceeding the speed of light in STR were made by collaboration of MINOS [9] on the US Tevatron collider and collaboration of OPERA [10] on the European Large Hadron Collider. However, MINOS experiment has been ignored by the physics community as not sufficiently reliable, and OPERA experiment has been refuted in six months by ICARUS experiment [11]. What is more, during those six months several dozen scientific publications have been devoted to the search for OPERA experiment refutation options. Some of them even claimed that, since the principle of non-exceeding the speed of light is fundamental in STR, then, if OPERA experiment had proved successful, its authors would have deserved the Nobel Prize.
However, as the author of the concept of 'open society' Sir Karl Raimund Popper noted [12]: "... the
struggle of opinions in scientific theories is inevitable and is a necessary prerequisite for the development of science". And, as it turned out, the problem of proving the physical reality of imaginary numbers at the same time had already been successfully solved, but using other experiments [13] - [17]. And from the experimentally proven principle of physical reality of imaginary numbers followed the fallacy of the principle of non-exceeding the speed of light. However, oddly enough, in this event, in contrast to the OPERA experiment, the physical community over the past years did not show interest and did not remember the Nobel Prize.
This circumstance involuntarily suggests itself the simple explanation that the physical community did not need scientific truth, but the maintenance of an erroneous public opinion about the alleged infallibility of STR. And in this capacity, the long-term very expensive and unique experiment OPERA, which failed to refute the principle of not exceeding the speed of light, turned out to be very useful, and the irrefutable alternative simple experiments described below, which managed to prove the fallacy of STR, on the contrary, were very inappropriate.
2. Why in STR the Principle of Non-Exceed-ance the Speed of Light is Fundamental
Why is the principle of non-exceeding the speed of light was so necessary in STR? Why the generally accepted at the present time version of STR would not be a success without it?
And the thing is that the corresponding to relativ-istic formulas of STR - for example, the formula of Lo-rentz-Einstein
m =
m„
1 - <%r
(1)
1 This publication is a revised version of the article "Antonov A. A. 2017. Hidden Multiverse: Extraterrestrial Super Civilizations. Natural Science, 9(3), 43-62. DOI: 10.4236/ns.2017.93005".
where m0 is the mass of the moving body rest
(for example, an elementary particle);
m is relativistic mass of the moving body; V is the speed of movement of the physical body; C is the speed of light;
- the physical values on the hyper light speeds when V > C are taking imaginary values. And the authors of STR did not know how to explain this result. Just as 400 years before them, none of the most authoritative physicists and mathematicians could prove the physical reality of imaginary numbers. So they were forced either to confess that they do not fully understand their theory, or in some way to avoid the need for such confession. Otherwise, STR would look unfinished and unconvincing.
In order to avoid such a situation, the authors of STR needed a principle of not exceeding the speed of light that was not proven (in other words, postulated), since in accordance with this principle at subluminal velocities at V < C the corresponding relativistic formulas, the quantities took on completely explainable and interestingly interpreted real values. And at hyperlight speeds V > C, it would seem that it was no longer necessary to explain anything, since such a situation was supposedly impossible.
And this postulate was substantiated at first glance even quite clearly as follows. Since the magnitude of the relativistic mass m in formula (1) depends on the velocity V, then at near-light velocities when V < C , the mass ^^ takes values approximating infinitely
large real values, i.e. limVm(V) = .
But then to overcome the point of astrophysical singularity V = C infinitely large energy becomes necessary. Consequently, it was impossible to overcome the speed light barrier. And so it was concluded that nothing exists behind this barrier, i.e. we live in a Monoverse.
But the given justification is refuted even at the everyday level. Indeed, the impossibility of getting into the next room of our dwelling through the barrier in the form of a wall separating them does not mean at all that the next room does not exist and that we cannot get into it through the door. But nature is much more complex than our home and therefore no one can claim that it is fully cognized and that there are no opportunities to overcome the astrophysical singularity in it.
3. The Proof of Principle of the Physical Reality of Imaginary Numbers
In order not to overload this article repeating the proofs of physical reality of imaginary numbers set forth in the publications mentioned above, we only note that they state the following:
• Analysis of oscillatory transient processes made it clear that if the principle of light speed non-exceedance implying the STR statement about physical unreality of imaginary numbers were true, then there would be no tsunami, church bells and musical instruments would not sound and even children's swing wouldn't sway after being pushed by parents;
• Analysis of oscillatory resonant processes made it clear that if the principle of light speed non-
exceedance implying the STR statement about physical unreality of imaginary numbers were true, then we would not know such exact sciences as radio engineering and electrical engineering, television and radiolocation, telecommunication, radio navigation and many others;
• Analysis of forced oscillatory processes made it clear that if the principle of light speed non-exceedance implying the STR statement about physical unreality of imaginary numbers were true, then even Ohm's law would not exist for electric circuits.
But in the 21st century this is still not understood in the existing physics of real numbers, since it still assumes that the principle of light speed non-exceedance is true. It t is interesting to note that the current version of STR could be refuted even before its creation. Indeed, the main works of the authors of STR [1] - [4], were published in 1897-1905, and in 1897 an engineer and inventor Charles Proteus Steinmetz has offered his interpretation of Ohm's law applied to the linear electric circuits of alternating current [18], which allowed to prove the physical reality of imaginary numbers the simplest and most convincing way. Thus, with its help, the uselessness in STR of the erroneous principle of not exceeding the speed of light could have been proven already at that time, if someone would need it.
At that time the Internet had not yet existed, and it was excusable to the creators of STR not know about Steinmetz's theory. But after a hundred plus years it is already unforgivable for the physicists not to know of established by Steinmetz theory, which is now is used by all electrical and radio engineers.
And not to be unfounded, let's give a simple proof of the physical reality of imaginary numbers [19] - [23], which made the costly MINOS, OPERA and ICARUS experiments unnecessary. In contrast to discovered in 1826 Ohm's law, which was formulated for electric DC circuits, Steinmetz suggested the wording of this law for electric AC circuits. In accordance with the theory he proposed, not only resistors have the electrical resistance (or conductivity) whose resistance is measured by real numbers, but also capacitors and inductance coils, the resistance of which are measured by imaginary numbers with different polarities. Moreover, the value of imaginary resistance of capacitors and inductance coils depends on the frequency. Therefore, resistance of any LCR-, RL-, RC- and LC-circuit is measured by complex numbers, the value of which also depends on the frequency applied to electrical voltage circuit.
This said, the resistance of capacitors and inductance coils measured by imaginary numbers is often also called imaginary. And under the dominant influence of STR they are still understood as imaginary, that is, really physically not existing. But this is not true. If the resistance of the capacitors and inductance coils were actually imaginary, then from the change in their values when the change of frequency of the applied voltage the value flowing through LCR-, RL-, RC-, LC-circuit of the electric current would have been independent. But the engineers have known for a long time that it de-
pends on the frequency. This is confirmed by the existence of mass-produced for several decades instruments for measuring the frequency characteristics of electrical circuits, which confirm the presence of the mentioned dependence.
Moreover, if the imaginary impedance of capacitors and inductance coils were not physically real, in electrical circuits could not be a resonance phenomenon discovered in 1602 by Galileo di Vincento Bonaiuti de'Galilei [24]. And then there would be no such science as radio engineering, telecommunications, radar, television, and many others.
Consequently, since mathematics is the universal language of all exact sciences, the physical reality of imaginary resistance of capacitors and inductors clearly shows the physical reality of imaginary numbers which measure the parameters of corresponding physical objects. Therefore, the principle of the physical reality of
imaginary numbers is general scientific and also applicable in special theory of relativity, quantum mechanics, optics and the rest of the exact sciences. There is other, equally compelling, evidence of the physical reality of imaginary numbers [13] - [17], [25], [26].
4. Refutation of the Principle of Non-Exceeding the Speed of Light
But from the principle of the physical reality of imaginary numbers, it follows that according to Lo-rentz-Einstein formula (1) relativistic mass ^^ at the hyper light speeds when V > C as well as imaginary physical values corresponding to the rest of the relativ-istic formulas when V > C are physically real. And the principle of non-exceeding the speed of light turns out to be unnecessary. And then it becomes necessary to do what the creators of STR were unable to do - to explain the meaning of these imaginary physical values [27].
Figure: 1. Graphs offunctions corresponding to formulas (1) and (2)
But this cannot be done, since the physical process corresponding to them is unstable (see Fig. 1a) and therefore cannot exist in nature. Consequently, formula (1), as well as other relativistic formulas of the existing version of STR, are incorrect. Therefore, the Lorentz-Einstein formula should be corrected as follows (see Fig. 1b):
mo {if _ mo {iY
m —
1 - ( % - q)
(2)
1 - (w )
where q —
c
is discrete function "floor"
(see Fig. 2a) from the argument
c
W — V — qc is its own for each local universe speed (see Fig. 2b), which can only take values in the range 0 < W < C;
V is the speed, measured from our universe, which can therefore be called an total speed;
I — a/ ^ is an imaginary unit.
Figure 2. Graphs of functions q(v) and w(v)
The rest of the relativistic formula can be corrected in a similar manner.
It should be noted that Albert Einstein did not exclude STR correction in the future. He wrote: "No single idea, which I would be sure that it will stand the test of time ".
5. Hidden Multiverse
5.1. The Structure of the Hidden Multiverse
Then it is necessary to explain the physical meaning of formula (2). And in this formula the parameter q
, as you can see (see Fig. 1b), corresponds to the fourth spatial dimension. But such a four-dimensional space has nothing to do with the four-dimensional Minkowski space. In this four-dimensional space, different parallel universes will correspond to the integer values of the
parameter q. The value of the parameter q = 0 will
correspond to our visible universe, since in formula (2)
i0 = 1, and the value of the parameter q = 1 will
correspond to another universe, as for it i1 = i. For this second universe C ^ V < 2c. Therefore, it contains tachyons [28], [29] and it is invisible to us, because it is beyond the event horizon. For the sake of
certainty, we will call it tachyon. Then, for similar reasons, we will call our universe tardyon. Consequently, formula (2), in contrast to formula (1), corresponds to the Multiverse formed by mutually invisible universes, which we will call the hidden Multiverse [30]. But from formula (2) it does not at all follow that there are only two universes in the hidden Multiverse. So let's continue. The parameter q — 2 will correspond to the
•2 _ -,
tardyon antiverse (since I — —1 ), the parameter q — 3 will correspond to the tachyon antiverse (since
• 3 _ • >
I — —I ), the parameter q = 4 will correspond
•4-1
to another tardyon universe (since I — 1 ), the parameter q — 5 will correspond to another tachyon
universe (since i
,5
I ), etc.
Figure 3. The structure of the hidden Multiverse, corresponding to the principle ofphysical reality of complex
numbers
Thus, the mutually invisible parallel universes (since, despite their infinity, they do not intersect anywhere) of the hidden Multiverse in four-dimensional space form a screw structure shown in Fig. 3. And these parallel universes in multidimensional space, drifting continuously, sometimes touch each other (as the people in the crowd), and sometimes even partially immerse in each other, while forming a certain transition
zones, through which parallel universes can exchange their material content. These numerous transition zones between adjacent universes are often referred to in the fiction as portals or stellar gates [31], in which the value of the parameter q changes smoothly (while in the par-
allel universes the value of the parameter q is constant), are shown in Figure 3 by means of single bidirectional arrows.
5.2. Explanation of the Dark Matter and Dark Energy
However, any structure of the Multiverse cannot be considered satisfactory in any way, if it is does not explain the phenomenon of dark matter and dark energy [32], [33]. Not only astrophysical, but general scientific worldview importance of this problem is caused by the facts that:
• mass-energy of the dark matter and dark energy exceeds the mass-energy of our entire visible universe more than twenty times;
• none of the known chemical elements, and even any subatomic particles, are found in the composition of dark matter and dark energy, which raises doubts about the correctness of understanding of notion "matter" and presumably pushes science in its development on thousands of years back.
This phenomenon has not been explained up until very recently. Moreover, its explanation failed to even come close in the past decades. The reason for that is just the wrong statement of the search task of explaining the phenomenon certainly in Monoverse corresponding to the existing incorrect version of STR. But as Albert Einstein claimed: "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results ".
But if we abandon this restrictive condition and will seek a solution to the problem in the hidden Multiverse, we won't even have to look for it. It is obvious [34]-[40]:
• dark matter and dark energy are gravitational images of the rest, except for our visible universe, invisible parallel universes of the hidden Multiverse;
• dark matter is a gravitational image of the invisible parallel universes of the hidden multiverse adjacent to our visible universe;
• dark energy is a gravitational image of the rest, except for our visible universe and its neighboring invisible universes, invisible parallel universes of the hidden Multiverse;
• it is impossible to determine the chemical composition of the contents of dark matter and dark energy, since it is simply absent in any image, either in the optical or in any other electromagnetic, or in the gravitational one.
5.3. Antimatter, anti-time and anti-space
No less important and incomprehensible problem in cosmology than the phenomenon of the dark matter and dark energy is the explanation of antimatter location [41], [42]. Indeed, the Big Bang which occurred 13.8 billion years ago had to create matter and antimatter in equal amounts. But our universe consists of the matter only. The scientists were able to synthesize antimatter, as well as to discover it in some natural phenomena only in minute amounts, which, however, confirms the possibility of its existence.
So the logical question is - where the antimatter is located in large quantities? Clearly, there's no place for it in the Monoverse. Otherwise, as a result of the annihilation of matter and antimatter the visible universe would have been destroyed. And in the hidden Multiverse, as a result of the alternation in the multidimensional space of universes and antiverses, both tardyon and tachyon, it can stably exist in the antiverses - both tardyon and tachyon. Moreover, as shown in Fig. 3, there may even be several pairs of universes and antiverses in it [43].
But the most interesting thing is that, according to the same logic, the time and space existing in the antiverses, according to the relativistic formulas of the alternative version of STR, are anti-time and anti-space.
5.4. Quaternion Structure of the Hidden Multiverse
Extremely valuable data obtained by the spacecraft WMAP [44], launched in 2001, and Planck [45], launched in 2009, allow to significantly clarify the structure of the hidden Multiverse.
According to the measurements of Planck the whole universe (in fact, the whole hidden Multiverse) is made up of baryonic matter by 4, 9% (and according to the previous measurements of WMAP - by 4.6%), by 26.8% (according to
Figure 4. Supposed structure of the Multiverse, corresponding to the physical reality of quaternions
WMAP measurements - by 22.4%) of the dark matter, and by 68.3% (according to WMAP measurements - by 73.0%) of dark energy.
On the basis of these data it is safe to assume that as a result of mutual exchange through the portals of micro- and mini-content of the parallel universes, their mass-energy has the largely averaged out (even if, for some reason, immediately after the Bing Bang their mass-energy in different universes would have been different), and it is with great accuracy equal to the mass-energy of our universe.
Therefore:
• According to Planck data the hidden Multiverse contains 100%/4.9% = 20.4 (and according to WMAP - 100%/4.6% = 21.8) parallel universes. I.e. the most probably 20 ... 22 parallel universes.
• According to Planck data the hidden Multiverse contains 26.8%/4 .9 = 5.5 (and according to WMAP 22.4%/4 .6% = 4.9) parallel universes. I.e. the most probably 5 ... 6 parallel universes.
• According to Planck data the hidden Multiverse contains 68.3%/4.9 = 13.9 (and according to WMAP 73.0%/4 .6% = 15.9) parallel universes. I.e. the most probably 14 ... 16 parallel universes.
Figure 5. The six-dimensional space of the hidden Multiverse.
However, it is not difficult to note that these results do not correspond to the structure of the hidden Multiverse, as shown in Figure 3. In fact, in the structure of the hidden Multiverse shown above our tardyon universe had only two neighboring universes, rather than 5 ... 6 universes. Consequently, some important
facts when configuring this structure had not been taken into account.
And what kind of circumstances are those, which may have conditioned the emergence of 5 ... 6 tachyon neighboring universes and antiverses in our tardyon universe? To answer this question, let us recall that the
tachyon universes and antiverse in the above structure of the hidden Multiverse were a consequence of accounting in the formulas (2) of the physical reality of only one imaginary unit, which is typical for complex numbers, and statement of the existence of only one ad-
ditional spatial measurement. Therefore, in this situation it is logical to assume that for the existence of 5 ... 6 neighboring tachyon universes and antiverses requires three additional spatial dimensions and accounting for physical reality of hyper complex numbers [46], containing three
Figure 6. Hypothetic structure of the hidden Multiverse, corresponding to the physical reality of quaternions
imaginary units lj ,l2. And these three im-
l1l2l3
l2l3l1
l3l1l2
aginary units l] ,12 in quaternions are interconnected by the corelations
•2 '2 '2 t
l1 = l2 = l3 = 1 (3)
1 (4)
l1l3l2 = l2l1l3 = l3l2l1 = 1 (5)
Consequently, Lorentz-Einstein formula should be corrected once more as follows
m (li )q (h )r (¡3)s _ m (li )q (h )r (h )s
^VC^q^^2 ]i - (yc )2
(6)
c
where q is the total number of parallel universes,
penetration to which with the distance from our tardyon universe is realized via portals corresponding to the imaginary unit l ;
r is the total number of parallel universes, penetration to which with the distance from our tardyon universe is realized via portals corresponding to the imaginary unit l ;
s is the total number of parallel universes, penetration to which with the distance from our tardyon universe is realized via portals corresponding to the imaginary unit l ;
W = V - (q + r + s)c is its local to the respective universe speed, which can take values only in the range of 0 < W < C;
V is the speed, measured from our tardyon universe, that is why let's call it the total speed.
Other relativistic formulas in the alternative version of STR [47] can be corrected in a similar way.
The quaternion structure of the hidden Multiverse [48] corresponding to the formula (2) is shown in Figure 4. There the single bilateral arrows indicate numerous bidirectional portals corresponding to the ratio (3), and the single unilateral arrows indicate numerous oneway portals, corresponding to the ratios (4) and (5).
The structure of the six-dimensional space, in which such a hidden Multiverse exists, is illustrated in Figure 5. However, given in Figure 4 structure of the hidden Multiverse is still not fully in line with the results of calculations given above, as it contains not 20 ... 22 parallel universes but 24 universes. Therefore, some 2 ... 4 parallel universes should be excluded out
of it, as shown for example in Figure 6. However, the structure of the hidden multiverse thus obtained has edges, which give rise to the question - what is behind these edges? And the most natural response to this question would be a statement that there are other Multiverses behind them that do not fall under our observations not only by electromagnetic but also by gravitational manifestations. In other words, it can be affirmed that there is not only our hidden Multiverse, but also other Multiverses, which together form the Hyperverse.
5.5.Verifiability of the Hidden Multiverse
Currently a large number of various implementations of the Multiverses are offered. The most interesting of them are set forth in [49]-[56]. However, all of them are unverifiable, i.e. even in the distant future they can neither be experimentally confirmed nor refuted. And that is why so many scientists are skeptical to the idea of the Multiverse - why study what actually does not actually exist. According to them (and the author agrees with them) the efforts aimed at solving the real secrets of nature are much more important.
But the idea of the hidden Multiverse outlined above is verifiable [57], because:
• it has experimental confirmation in the form of dark matter and dark energy, since they are gravitational images of all other universes, except for ours, forming the our Multiverse;
• it has also a confirmation in the form of those experiments on particle accelerators, as a result of which there was a mass defect which was explained by the tachyons formation and their passage through the microportals to the neighboring universes;
• it can be experimentally confirmed by astronomical observations of the starry sky in portals, which are the so-called anomalous zones on Earth [58].
Of the listed options for experimental confirmation of the existence of non-visible universes, the latter is the most reliably evidential, since the existence of previously unknown constellations of the starry sky in them can be checked, and the most interest, since it allows you to get a lot of additional information about invisible universes. In particular, it will allow us to determine exactly how many adjacent invisible universes our visible universe has. And this, in turn, will allow us to clarify the structure of the hidden Multiverse and, possibly, experimentally prove the existence of the phenomenon of dark space.
Therefore, this option deserves at least a small additional explanation. So how can astronomical observations in portals be interesting? And by the fact that they will make it possible to see [59], [60] invisible universes and thereby unambiguously prove (or disprove) their existence. Indeed, since the constellations of our visible universe are visible at the entrance to the portal, and at its exit - constellations of one of the neighboring invisible universes that are extremely different from them, then some intermediate images of them will be visible in the portal it self. Therefore, when moving along the portal, it will seem that the stars in the sky are moving, and also sometimes disappear or, conversely, appear. Those the differences between the constellations observed inside the portal and the constellations observed outside the portal will be noticeably greater than the differences recorded in the 1919 observations by Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington [61].
Figure: 7. Scheme of an experiment to detect invisible universes
But astronomical observations in portals are difficult to make, since portals are invisible labyrinths in which you can get lost. And this situation is saved by the fact that to detect changes in constellations in portals do not need to go far. Even at the very entrance to the portals (i.e.in anomalous zones), small changes in constellations by modern measuring means can be safely detected. And therefore it may be that some astronomical observatories are already in anomalous zones. As, for example, the main astronomical observatory of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in the Goloseevsky Forest is only 12 km away from the center of Kiev. This observatory was created in 1949 and no one has disappeared in the portal adjacent to it. This proves that attempts to detect invisible universes
using observatories located in anomalous zones can be quite safe. But since this observatory is located at the very entrance to the portal, the differences between the images of the starry sky observed in it and the images of the same section of the starry sky observed by other observatories are so small that no one noticed them. But they may not have been noticed also because it simply did not occur to anyone that such differences could be. And now you need to pay attention to this circumstance.
A corresponding experiment aimed at detecting universes invisible outside the portals is very simple (Fig. 7). It is only necessary to compare the images of the same area of the starry sky observed by several observatories located close to each other in the computing
center, at least the one of which is in the anomalous zone. This experiment, as you can see, is very low-cost, as well as quickly and easily implemented.
6. The Problem of Contacts with the Inhabitants of the Hidden Multiverse
6.1. Types of civilizations
Since it follows from the foregoing that the neighboring with our universe other parallel universes are actually physically exist and that the portals connecting our universe with them actually physically exist, including those located at the Earth, it is useful to consider the problem with contacts inevitably existing around us other civilizations as well.
And for this, first of all, let us clarify the corresponding basic concepts on this problem. By civilization we mean the hierarchical structure of living beings united for the common good and able to mutually coordinate their activities, exchanging the information necessary for this, i.e. possessing the language. And by super-civilization we mean a more developed civilization than our human civilization. Currently, it is generally accepted that there is only one civilization on Earth -human. And that only people know how to talk to each other. However, it is not.
Firstly, humanity itself is not a single civilization, but is divided according to territorial, economic, cultural, religious, linguistic, racial and historical characteristics on subcivilization. And these subcivilizations correspond to different levels of their development.
Secondly, according to the proposed definition, many biological communities are also civilizations -monkey and wolf packs, herds of elephants, and even anthills and bee swarms. But they differ significantly from human subcivilizations. And their main difference from the most developed human subcivilizations is the absence of industrial production. Therefore, they, unlike human industrial subcivilizations, can be called non-industrial subcivilizations. But one should not think that any industrial civilization is always more developed than any non-industrial civilization. For example, there is reason to believe that the feline civilization on Earth does not think so, because in the family that has sheltered it, sometimes cats establish the rules of relationships that people accept. People also do not understand dog barking, and some breeds of dogs understand more than a hundred human words [62].
Finally, on Earth, of course, there is also super-civilization unknown to us, whose habitat extends beyond the boundaries of our planet, the entire solar system and even our visible universe.
Indeed, according to modern estimates, the number of galaxies in our visible universe alone is about 2E11. And in each galaxy there are about 1E8 stars. Of these, at least 8E9 contain planets similar to Earth, on which life is possible. Moreover, the age of the stars is very different. For example, the star HE 1523-0901 is 13.2E9 years old, the Sun is 4.6E9 years old, Sirius is 2.3E8, and the recently discovered Swift J1818.0-1607 star is only about 240 years old. For comparison, we recall that the age of our visible universe is about 13.8E9.
Therefore, the super-civilization present on the Earth is certainly both terrestrial and extraterrestrial.
And it is unknown to us because it is reliably protected from human attention in the same way as people are protected from the penetration of animals, snakes, insects and other unwanted living inhabitants of the Earth into their homes.
And this super-civilization perceives us nearly the same way as we perceive cat, dog and other non-industrial sub civilizations living next to us as intelligence tests, for example, we have not passed in the form of crop circles. In the order to further explain how you can improve the human intellect, it is necessary to clarify this concept as well, by which we will mean the individual and collective ability to detect the patterns in the initial data array (in particular, to read encrypted messages) and to use received information.
6.2. The Problem of Contact with the Super-Civilization
The scientists have been unsuccessfully trying to solve the problem of contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations that exist in outer space since 1959 within the framework of SETI project (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence), which from 1971 is carried out under the auspices of NASA. And in 2015, Professor Stephen William Hawking, and billionaire Yuri Borisovich Milner announced that for Breakthrough Listen initiative for the same purpose they have allocated another $100 million [63].
However, the formulation of the problem of searching for other civilizations in deep space until now, obviously, made sense only insofar as, within the framework of the hypothesis of a Monoverse corresponding to the existing version of SRT, there was no alternative to it. But, as shown above, the existing version of STR turned out to be erroneous. Therefore, the discovery of the really existing hidden Multiverse and Hyperverse, the search for extraterrestrial civilizations in deep space made unnecessary. Such searches do not make sense because one can simply go to neighboring universes on foot through the numerous portals that are in the territory of almost all countries, the entrances to which are anomalous zones. But since the portals are still completely unexplored anomalous objects, their visits and research will need to be carried out extremely carefully with the obligatory use of special portal navigation equipment (similar to a navigator's compass, which allows you to determine the correct direction of further movement), so as not to get lost in the portals.
Therefore, the problem for us is not in the search of super-civilizations, and not even not in search of contact with them, because to be or not to be of our contacts with super-civilizations - it is not us who decide, but they are. Therefore, such contacts could take place only if our human civilization will be of interest to the Earth's super-civilization. To do this, obviously, human civilization must be harmless for them, useful, and have a sufficiently high intelligence. Therefore, we still have to pass the test in the form of crop circles.
And in order to better understand the problem of contacts, it would be useful for us to learn how to establish meaningful contacts with terrestrial non-industrialized sub civilizations - communities of monkeys, dogs, cats, elephants, dolphins, etc. - and understand them, since they may have knowledge unknown to us.
6.3. Creation of Human Super-Intelligence
That is why now the main task of mankind in space is not the search for extra-terrestrial super-civilizations and not attempts to establish contact with them, but much more difficult problem of self-perfecting of our human civilization to a level of extraterrestrial super-civilizations. A scientific component of this problem, which we would consider further, is, first of all, to find ways of creating human super-intelligence. It should be solved by scientists and engineers specializing in the field of information technology.
To understand how this problem can be solved, first we need to clarify what is human intelligence, what is artificial intelligence and what is super-intelligence. And also to remember what is technological singularity.
And let's start with technological singularity by which the point of time is understood -according to various estimates within 2018 or at the latest 2030 or at the latest 2045 year -after which as a result of Moore's law computers and the Internet allegedly will become so sophisticated that there will be computer civilization at the Earth (or computer super-intelligence) that can enslave people. But this is -just an interesting fiction of talented writers of science fiction, which made a great impression on readers, including some scientists and engineers [64] [65].
But this is what one of the most authoritative experts in the field of information security, Evgeny Val-entinovich Kaspersky states: "The intelligence of a mosquito is more complex than that of any man-made development... What is called artificial intelligence today? Self-learning programs, algorithms designed to perform a specific job. Let's say face recognition. It's smart, complex, but program. The human intellect has motivation and randomness of choice, but here it is not yet." And further: "Sooner or later people will create artificial intelligence, but I think this will not happen soon. AI is not a problem for us, not even for our children and grandchildren. If a human brain is assembled on a modern hardware base, the product will be larger than the planet Earth".
So at present, artificial intelligence is actually not even intelligence, since it does not choose tasks for itself, but solves the tasks assigned to it by a person. The concept of technological singularity is generally unrealistic, since it does not take into account the fact that humanity is already widely using a large number of dangerous technologies, over which it has learned to maintain reliable control. Moreover, as a result of scientific and technological progress, such dangerous technologies will inevitably be used more and more. And, therefore, the possibilities for inventing horror stories will also become more and more. And not only computer ones. But people will be able to maintain reliable control over computers.
The weak link of technological singularity concept is the assertion that it is possible to create super-intelligence on the basis of artificial intelligence and the Internet. In [66] - [68] it explains that this assertion is erroneous, since it does not take into account:
• nor degree of perfection of the human intelligence, which uses a different set of very useful (but
poorly studied) forms of human thought, including the powerful subconscious multi-factor mind used, in particular, at the decision of creative tasks;
• nor the degree of imperfection of artificial intelligence, which only imitates the most primitive type of human thinking - low-factor rational thinking (and without the support of multi-factor thinking);
• nor degree of imperfection of the Internet, which has many flaws, making it virtually unusable (except for e-mail and the World Wide Web WWW) n business, in scientific research and in other types of creative activities of people.
But on the basis of multi-factor thinking the human super-intelligence, capable of solving creative problems that are now unsolvable in science (including medicine), in business, in the administration management and other kinds of human activity can be realized. For the implementation of the human super-intelligence the existing computers need other software, it is quite feasible, and special network support, for which, however, the Internet is fundamentally not capable. Using of computer net-works [69] - [71] for the same purpose, which instead of the packet communication will use anti-noise coding will allow to solve such problems successfully [72] - [74]. At the same time, this will make computer super-intelligence guaranteed unrealizable. Finally, the danger of technological singularity is most incontrovertibly refuted by the fact of the existence of super-civilizations themselves.
Human civilization, which has mastered new informational super-intellectual technologies as a result of the creation of human-computer super-intelligence, will have at its disposal a new extremely powerful tool of cognition, as a result of which it can, ultimately, turn into a super-civilization.
Conclusions
The article explains that the worldview foundation of our human civilization, in accordance with which the cognition and exploration of outer space is currently being carried out, is very imperfect. Really:
• For more than a hundred years, studies have been carried out that correspond to the existing version of the workshop. But what is dark matter and dark energy, where there is anti-matter, which does not annihilate with matter, where there are tachyons that do not violate the principle of causality, how to prove physical reality and explain the physical essence of imaginary numbers, and much more is still not known. And the alternative version of the STR, which has already solved all these problems, is simply ignored with perseverance worthy of better application. Even though the fairness of the existing version of the STO is confirmed only by postulates, and the fairness of the alternative version of the STO is confirmed by experiments.
• It is proved that the relativistic formulas of the existing version of SRT are incorrect, incorrectly explained using the principle of non-exceeding the speed of light, which does not exist in nature, and from them an incorrect conclusion was made about the existence of our only visible universe in nature. At the same time, the predicted by the alternative version of SRT the possibility by direct astronomical observations in portals (or at least in anomalous zones) to see invisible outside
the portals universes is ignored. Therefore this ignores the opportunity to make sure that the existing version of the SRT, which is the basis of modern physics, is incorrect.
• It was explained that the generally accepted opinion in cosmology about the low probability of the existence of civilizations other than human is incorrect. In fact, there are many of these civilizations in space, but they are effectively protected from the curiosity of the inhabitants of less developed civilizations in the same way as human civilization is protected from snakes, insects and other living inhabitants of the Earth harmful to people. Therefore, on the moon and on Mars and on Venus - in short, everywhere - they will be able to protect themselves from the importunity of people. After all, on Earth, people could not find them. And the fact that astronomers are bewildered by the fact that in space they do not observe the spacecraft of inhabitants of extraterrestrial civilizations is explained by the fact that they do not move in open space, but along much less extended routes through portals (like people in the subway, without leaving it).
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful for participation in the discussion of the paper to my wife Olga Ilyinichna An-tonova, whose criticism and valuable comments contributed to improvement of the article.
References
1. Larmor J. J. (1897) A Dynamical Theory of the Electric and Luminiferous Medium. Part III. Relations with Material Media. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 190. 205-300
2. Lorentz H. A. (1899) Simplified theory of electrical and optical phenomena in moving sys-tems. Proceeding of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Science. 1. 427-442
3. Poincare H. (1905) On the dynamics of the electron. Comptes Rendus. 140. 1504-1508.
4. Einstein, A. (1905) Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Korper. Annalen der Physik. 17(10). 891 -921.
5. Einstein A. (1920) Relativity: The Special and General Theory. H. Holt and company, NY.
6. Bohm D. (2006) The Special Theory of Relativity. Routledge.
7. Hawking S.W., Penrose R. (2010) The Nature of Space and Time. Princeton University Press.
8. Antonov A.A. (2014) Verification of the second postulate of the special relativity theory. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: A Physics & Space Science. 14(3), 51 - 59.
9. Adamson P., Ashby N., Bumgarner R. (2007) Measurement of the Velocity of the Neutrino with MINOS, arXiv :1408.6267v 1 [physics.acc-ph].
10. Adam T., Agafonova N., Aleksandrov A. et al. (2011) Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam. arXiv:1109.4897v4 [hep-ex].
11. Antonello M., Baibussinov B., Boffelli F. et al. (2012) Precision measurement of the neutrino velocity with the ICARUS detector in the CNGS beam. arXiv:1208.2629 [hep-ex]
12. Popper K.R. 2002. Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scienrific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
13. Antonov A.A. (2008). Physical Reality of Resonance on Complex Frequencies. European Journal of Scientific Research. 21(4), 627 - 641
14. Antonov A.A. (2009) Resonance on Real and Complex Frequencies. European Journal of Scientific Research. 28(2), 193 - 204
15. Antonov A.A. (2010) Solution of algebraic quadratic equations taking into account transitional processes in oscillation systems. General Mathematics Notes, 1(2), 11 - 16.
16. Antonov A.A. (2010) New Interpretation of Resonance. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences and Technology, 1(2), 1 - 12.
17. Antonov A.A. (2010) Oscillation processes as a tool of physics cognition. American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 1(2), 342 - 349.
18. Steinmetz C.P. (2010) Theory and Calculation of Electric Circuit. Nabu Press., Charlstone, SC.
19. Antonov A.A. (2015) Adjustment of the special theory of relativity according to the Ohm's law. American Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engi-neeing. 3(5), 124 - 129
20. Antonov A.A. (2015) Ohm's Law explains as-trophysical phenomenon of dark matter and dark energy. Global Journal of Physics. 2(2), 145 - 149.
21. Antonov A.A. (2016) Ohm's law is the general law of exact sciences. PONTE. 72(7), 131 -142
22. Antonov A.A. (2016). Ohm's law refutes current version of the special theory of relativity. Journal of Modern Physics. 7, 2299-2313.
23. Antonov A. A. Chapter 11. A recent approach: Ohm's law refutes current version of the special theory of relativity. In: Mohd Rafatullah (Eds). New Insights into Physical Science. Book Publisher International. 2020. 8. 139-152. DOI: 10.9734/bpi/nips/v8
24. Frova A., Marenzana M. (2006) Thus spoke Galileo: The great scientist's ideas and their relevance to the present day. Oxford University Press, NY.
25. Antonov A.A. (2016) Physical Reality and Nature of Imaginary, Complex and Hypercomplex Numbers. General Mathematics Notes, 35(2) 40 - 63.
26. Antonov A. A. (2017) The physical reality and essence of imaginary numbers. Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science. 6. 50-63.
27. Antonov A.A. (2014) Correction of the special theory of relativity: physical reality and nature of imaginary and complex numbers. American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 5(2), 40 - 52
28. Tanaka S. (1960) Theory of matter with superlight velocity. Progress of Theoretical Physics (Kyoto), 24(1), 171 - 200.
29. Feinberg G. (1967) Possibility of faster-than-light particles. Physical Review, 155(5), 1089 - 1105.
30. Antonov A.A. (2015) Hidden Multiverse. International Journal of Advanced Research in Physical Science, 2(1), 25 - 32.
31. Antonov A.A. (2016) Stargate of the hidden Multiverse. Philosophy and cosmology. 6. 11-27.
32. Freeman K., McNamara G. (2006) In Search of Dark Matter. Springer, NY.
33. Nicolson I. (2007) Dark Side of the Universe: Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Fate of the Cosmos. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
34. Antonov A.A. (2015) Hidden Multiverse: explanation of dark matter and dark energy phenomena. International Journal of Physics, 3(2), 84 - 87.
35. Antonov A.A. (2015) Explanation of dark matter and dark energy phenomena. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: A Physics and Space Science, 15(1), 33 - 38.
36. Antonov A.A. (2015) Hidden Multiverse: explanation of dark matter and dark energy phenomena. Cosmology, 19, 40 - 61.
37. Antonov A.A. (2015) Why dark matter and dark energy are invisible? Optics, 4(6), 43 - 47.
38. Antonov A.A. (2015) The astrophysical phenomenon of dark matter and dark energy proves the existence of the hidden Multiverse. American Journal of Modern Physics, 4(4), 180 - 188.
39. Antonov A.A. (2016) Explaining the Phenomenon of Dark Matter and Dark Energy by Existence of the Hidden Multiverse. Frontiers of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology. 2(1), 1 - 9.
40. Antonov A.A. (2016) Hypothesis of the Hidden Multiverse: Explains Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Journal of Modern Physics, 7(10), 1228 - 1246.
41. Alfven H. (1966) Worlds-Antiworlds: Antimatter in Cosmology. W. H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco.
42. Frazer G. (2004) Antimatter: The Ultimate Mirror. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Antonov A.A. (2016) Dark matter, dark energy and antimatter are located in the hidden Multiverse. PONTE, 72(8), 288 - 300.
44. Hinshaw G., Larson D., Komatsu E. et al. (2013) Nine Year Wilkinson Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results. arXiv: 1213.5226 [astro-ph/CO]
45. Adam R., Ade P.A.R., Aghanim N. et al. (2015) Plank 2015 results. 1. Overviev of products and scientific results. arXiv:1502.01582v2 [astro-ph.CO]
46. Kantor I. L., Solodovnikov A. S. (1989) Hy-percomplex numbers. Springer. Verlag, Berlin.
47. Antonov A. A. Chapter 2. Discussion on the Comparative Analysis of Existing and Alternative Version of the Special Theory of Relativity. In: Mohd Ra-fatullah (Eds). New Insights into Physical Science. Book Publisher International. 2021. 11, 15-31. DOI: 10.9734/bpi/nips/v 11
48. Antonov A.A. (2015) Quaternion structure of the hidden Multiverse: explanation of dark matter and dark energy. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: A Physics and Space Science, 15(8) 8 - 15
49. Deutch D. (1998) The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes and Its Implications. Penguin Books, NY.
50. Green B. (2000) The Elegant Universe: Super-strings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory. Random House Inc.
51. Steinhardt P.J., Turok N. (2007) Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang. Doubleday, NY.
52. Vilenkin A. (2006) Many Worlds in One: The Search for Other Universes. Hill and Wong, NY.
53. Carr B. ed. (2009) Universe or Multiverse? Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
54. Greene B. (2011) The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos. Random House Inc., NY.
55. Deutsch D. (2012) The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations That Transform the World. Re-print Edition. Penguin Books, NY.
56. Tegmark M. (2015) Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. Vintage, NY.
57. Antonov A.A. (2016) Verifiable Multiverse. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: A Physics and Space Science. 16(4) 4 - 12.
58. Chernobrov V.A. (2000) Encyclopedia of mysterious places of the Earth. Publishing house "Veche". Moscow.
59. Antonov A. A. Chapter 1. Documenting How to See Invisible Universes. In: Mohd Rafatullah (Eds). New Insights into Physical Science. Book Publisher International. 2021. 11. 1-14. DOI: 10.9734/bpi/nips/v11.
60. Antonov A. A. Chapter 3. Study on Universes Being Invisible on Earth Outside the Portals Are Visible in Portals. In: Mohd Rafatullah (Eds). New Insights into Physical Science. Book Publisher International. 2021. 11. 31-51. DOI: 10.9734/bpi/nips/v11.
61. Dyson F.W., Eddington A.S., Davidson C. A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun's Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29, 1919. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 1920. 220, 291-333. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1920.0009.
62. Coren S. (1995). The Intelligence of Dogs: A Guide to the Thoughts, emotions, and inner lives of our canine companions. NY Bantam Books.
63. Antonov A.A. (2015). Where to look for alien civilisations. Cosmology. Commentaries: Stephen Hawking's Aliens. The Search for Intelligent Extraterrestrial Life. Project Breakthrough Listen
64. Kurzweil R. 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking, NY.
65. Yudkowsky E.S. 2006. Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk. Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alta, CA, 1 - 41.
66. Antonov A.A. 2010. Human-computer superintelligence. American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 1(2), 96 - 104.
67. Antonov A.A. 2011. Human Super-Intelligence. International Journal of Emerging Sciences. 1(2), 164 - 173
68. Antonov A.A. 2011. From artificial intelligence to human super-intelligence. International Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2(6), 1 - 6
69. Antonov A.A. 2009. Safe Global/Regional Informational Network. European Journal of Scientific Research. 28(1), 165 - 174
70. Antonov A.A. 2012. The new global information network free from the drawbacks of the Internet. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology. 2(10), 957 - 962
71. Antonov A.A. 2013. New Global Computer Network. International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering. 3(1), 11 - 22.
72. Antonov A.A. 2013. New Business-Oriented Global/Regional Information Network. International
Journal of Business Information Systems. 12(3), 321 -334
73. Antonov A. A. (2013) New anti-crisis instruments for market economy. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology. 2(8). 738-744. http://www.ejour-nalofscience.org738
74. Antonov A. A. (2013) Fundamentals of crisis-proof economics. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies. 2(3). 196-215. http://www.issr-journals.org/ijias/
ПОДГОНКА ПОД РЕЗУЛЬТАТ В КВАНТОВОЙ И КЛАССИЧЕСКОЙ МЕХАНИКЕ
Рысин А.В.
АНО «НТИЦ «Техком» г. Москва, радиоинженер
Никифоров И.К.
Чувашский государственный университет, г. Чебоксары, кандидат технических наук, доцент
Бойкачев В.Н.
АНО «НТИЦ «Техком» г. Москва, директор кандидат технических наук Хлебников А.И.
студент 5-го курса факультета «Инженерная механика» РГУ нефти и газа им. И.М. Губкина,
г. Москва
FITTING TO THE RESULT IN QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL MECHANICS
Rysin A.
ANO "NTIC" Techcom " Moscow, radio engineer
Nikiforov I.
Chuvash state University, Cheboksary, candidate of technical Sciences, associate Professor
Boikachev V. candidate of technical Sciences ANO "NTIC" Techcom "Moscow, Director
Hlebnikov A.
5 th year student of the faculty of Engineering mechanics at the Russian state University of oil and gas. I.M.
Gubkina, Moscow
АННОТАЦИЯ
Математическое описание движения электрона вокруг протона в квантовой механике имеет множество парадоксов, так как при этом были сделаны многочисленные математические подгонки под практический результат. В дальнейшем это стало выдаваться в качестве неоспоримого подтверждения теории квантовой механики практическим результатам. Подобные подгонки под результат не возникли на пустом месте, так как основой всего этого послужила неправильная интерпретация реальных процессов классической механикой; при этом была сделана попытка совместить корпускулярные свойства с волновыми свойствами. Однако непонимание природы связи волновых свойств с корпускулярными свойствами привели к ошибочному вероятностному подходу с телепортацией через потенциальный барьер и орбиталями. Целью данной статьи является показать, в чём состоят эти парадоксы и определить правильные научные подходы к описанию движения электрона вокруг протона на основе известных законов физики.
ABSTRACT
The mathematical description of the motion of an electron around a proton in quantum mechanics has many paradoxes, since numerous mathematical adjustments were made to the practical result. In the future, this was issued as an indisputable confirmation of the theory of quantum mechanics to practical results. Such adjustments to the result did not arise from scratch, since the basis of all this was the incorrect interpretation of real processes by classical mechanics; an attempt was made to combine corpuscular properties with wave properties. However, a lack of understanding of the nature of the relationship between wave properties and corpuscular properties led to an erroneous probabilistic approach with teleportation through a potential barrier and orbitals. The purpose of this article is to show what these paradoxes are and to determine the correct scientific approaches to describing the motion of an electron around a proton based on the known laws of physics.
Ключевые слова: СТО и ОТО Эйнштейна, уравнение Шредингера, классические уравнения Максвелла, формула Луи де Бройля, уравнение Гамильтона-Якоби, формула Планка.
