CC BY
16
High performance tandem perovskite-silicon solar cells with very large bandgap photoelectrodes
A. B. Nikolskaia1, M.F. Vildanova1, S. S. Kozlov1, O. V. Almjasheva2, V. V. Gusarov2'3, O. I. Shevaleevskiy1
department of Solar Photovoltaics, Institute of Biochemical Physics RAS, Kosygin St. 4, Moscow, 119334, Russia 2 Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", Saint-Petersburg, Professora Popova St., 5, Saint Petersburg, 197376, Russia 3Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute RAS, Politekhnicheskaya St., 26, Saint Petersburg, 194021, Russia [email protected], [email protected]
PACS 84.60.Jt DOI 10.17586/2220-8054-2021-12-2-246-251
Nanostructured layers of metal oxides with very large bandgaps (Eg > 5 eV), such as ZrO2 and HfO2, were used as photoelectrodes in semitrans-parentperovskite solar cells (PSCs) with the device architecture of glass/FTO/c-TiO2/ZrO2 (orHfO2)/CH3NH3PbI3/PTAA/PEDOT:PSS/FTO/glass. The obtained PSCs were used as top elements for manufacturing high-performance four-terminal tandem perovskite-silicon solar cells. The comparative analysis of photovoltaic parameters measured for PSCs, crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells and tandem PSC/c-Si solar cells demonstrated that the application of very large-bandgap materials allows to improve the PSC performance and to increase the efficiency of tandem PSC/c-Si solar cell up to ~24% in comparison with a standalone c-Si solar cell. Keywords: photoelectrode, perovskite, solar cells, tandem solar cells, solar photovoltaics. Received: 3 January 2021 Revised: 1 April 2020
1. Introduction
To date, well-developed crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells under AM1.5G (1000 W/m2) lighting conditions demonstrate nearly 25% power conversion efficiency (PCE), that is already approaching their practical limit [1,2]. The further increase of c-Si cell performance can be attained by integration into the tandem configuration. Extensive possibilities for the design of tandem cells are associated with the recent appearance of effective perovskite solar cells (PSCs) [3,4]. This type of solar cell, in which a perovskite layer based on organic-inorganic hybrid compounds with a common ABX3 (A - CH3NH+, HC(NH2)+, B - Pb2+, Sn2+, X -1-, Br-, Cl-) formula is deposited on the surface of a nanostructured photoelectrode (usually TiO2), has attracted a considerable interest as the most demanded and cost-effective photovoltaic (PV) devices for the future mass production [5-7].
In tandem, perovskite-silicon (PSC/c-Si) solar cells PSCs are usually used as top elements in combination with bottom c-Si cells [8,9]. Tandem PSC/c-Si solar cells are commonly fabricated in two configurations: two-terminal and four-terminal [10,11]. The overall current output of the two-terminal tandem cell is limited by the lower of the currents generated by the connected in series individual sub cells That is why a four-terminal tandem configuration, in which the top and bottom cells are mechanically stacked and electrically isolated from each other, is preferable [12,13].
The efficiency and the degree of transparency of top cell strongly affects the tandem PSC/c-Si solar cell performance and depend on the structure and transport characteristics of the photoelectrodes used in PSCs [14-16]. In our previous works [17,18], we demonstrated that very wide-bandgap nanostructured materials, like ZrO2 with Eg values of 5.26 and 5.53 eV for two direct band transitions and HfO2 with the Eg value of 5.56 eV for indirect band transition, can be successfully used as photoelectrodes for PSCs. The incorporation of mesoscopic ZrO2 (or HfO2) layer into the PSCs with the standard architecture of glass/FTO/c-TiO2/ZrO2 (or HfO2)/CH3NH3PbI3/Spiro-MeO-TAD/Au led to the improvement of PV performance of PSCs [17]. However, these PV devices cannot be used as top elements in tandem systems because of the low optical transparency of Spiro-MeO-TAD layer and Au contacts in the visible range of the visible light spectrum. PTAA or P3HT as a hole transporting material and PEDOT:PSS-based counter electrode can be used for fabrication semi-transparent PSCs [19,20].
In this work, photoelecrodes based on very wide-bandgap materials such as ZrO2 and HfO2 (Eg > 5 eV) were successfully used for fabrication of semi-transparent PSCs with the cell architecture of glass/FTO/c-TiO2/ZrO2 (or HfO2)/CH3NH3PbI3/PTAA/PEDOT:PSS/FTO/glass under ambient conditions. The obtained PSCs were used as top
elements for manufacturing highly efficient four-terminal tandem PSC/c-Si solar cells. The PV performance of PSCs, standalone c-Si and tandem PSC/Si solar cells was studied. The obtained results provide a novel effective approach to increase the overall efficiency of light conversion to electricity.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and samples preparation
ZrO2 and HfO2 nanoparticles were obtained by hydrothermal treatment of co-precipitated zirconium and hafnium hydroxides from solutions of the corresponding metal salts [21]. TiO2 nanoparticles (P25 Aeroxide Degussa) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) and were used for fabrication of state-of-the-art TiO2 photoelectrode [22]. Thick pastes from MO2 (where M=Ti, Zr or Hf) nanopowders were prepared in organic solvent following the method described in [23]. The pastes were dissolved in ethanol in mass ratio 1:5 and spin-coated onto FTO conductive glass (Solaronix, 2x2 cm) covered by compact layer (c-TiO2) with subsequent annealing at 500°C for 30 min. Mesoscopic MO2 photoelectrodes with thickness 180-220 nm were obtained.
Perovskite (CH3NH3PM3) layers were formed on MO2 using a conventional one-step deposition method [24,25]. PTAA with Li-TFSI and 4-tert-Butylpyridine additives in toluene was used as a hole transporting material. It was drop-casted onto the perovskite surface and then covered by counter electrode of PEDOT:PSS/FTO according to the procedure described elsewhere [19]. PTAA, PEDOT:PSS, Li-TFSI and 4-tert-Butylpyridine were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. All the steps of PSC fabrication process were provided under ambient conditions with a relative humidity about 40%.
Samples of c-Si solar cells were kindly provided by the research group of G. Untila from Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University.
2.2. Characterization studies
The optoelectronic properties of MO2 photoelectrodes were characterized using UV-vis spectroscopy (Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) with an ISR-3100 integrating sphere at wavelengths ranging from 300-1200 nm). The measurements of the PV parameters for PSCs fabricated, for c-Si solar cells and for tandem PSC/c-Si solar cells were provided under standard illumination conditions of 1000 W/m2 (AM1.5G) using Semiconductor Characterization System (Keithley, USA). The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra were recorded using QEX10 Solar Cell Quantum Efficiency Measurement System (PV Measurements, USA) in the range of 300-1100 nm.
3. Results and discussion
Optical transmittance spectra of mesoscopic MO2 photoelectrodes are plotted in Fig. 1. All samples are characterized by a high degree of transparency in the visible light range and can be used for constructing top elements in tandem systems. It is seen that transmittance region is wider for very wide-bandgap materials (ZrO2 and HfO2) than for TiO2 due to the area of 250-350 nm in UV radiation range. This correlates with energy bandgap data obtained in earlier studies [18].
Semi-transparent PSCs with the architecture glass/FTO/c-TiO2/MO2/CH3NH3PbI3/PTAA/PEDOT: PSS/FTO/glass were fabricated under ambient conditions. Comparative J - V curves for all samples recorded under standard illumination (1000 W/m2, AM1.5G) are shown in Fig. 2. The PV parameters of PSCs including short circuit current density (Jsc), open circuit voltage (VOC), fill factor (FF) and power conversion efficiency (PCE) are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1. The PV characteristics of PSC devices based on mesoscopic MO2 photoelectrodes
Photoelectrode type Jsc, mA/cm2 Voc, V FF, a.u. PCE, %
TiO2 17.58 ± 0.17 0.99 ± 0.01 0.69 ± 0.01 11.94 ± 0.15
ZrO2 16.30 ± 0.24 1.06 ± 0.02 0.74 ± 0.02 12.72 ± 0.29
HfO2 13.40 ± 0.32 1.06 ± 0.01 0.70 ± 0.02 9.96 ± 0.36
PSC devices with mesoscopic TiO2 photoelectrodes show the average PCE of 11.94%. The substitution of TiO2 layer by a very wide-bandgap materials leads to the improvement of the VOC values, which is attributed to the difference in the conduction band positions of TiO2 and ZrO2 (HfO2) [17,18]. However, a drop in Jsc values is found with incorporation of ZrO2 and HfO2 materials, which can be explained by their insulating nature [18].
Fig. 1. Optical transmittance spectra of mesoscopic MO2 photoelectrodes (1 - TiO2, 2 - ZrO2, 3-HfO2)
Fig. 2. J - V curves for the PSC devices based on mesoscopic MO2 photoelectrodes (1 - TiO2, 2-ZrO2, З-НЮ2)
The highest average performance of 12.72% is demonstrated by PSC samples with ZrO2 photoelectrode and it is 6.5% higher than for TiO2-based device. The observed difference is due to various charge transfer mechanisms. The charge transfer in TiO2 layer is carried out through the conduction band, whereas the charge transfer in ZrO2 photoelectrode occurs via the hopping conduction mechanism through localized states within forbidden zone [17]. As a result, the recombination losses at the ZrO2/perovskite interface are lower than for TiO2/perovskite. The PCE of HfO2-based PSCs is lower than for others due to lower Jsc values. This is more likely attributed to the insufficient layer morphology and less favorable positions of the electronic states in HfO2 forbidden zone [18].
All fabricated PSC devices based on mesoscopic MO2 photoelectrodes were used as top elements in four-terminal tandem PSC/c-Si solar cells. The c-Si solar cells were used as bottom elements and were mechanically stacked with PSCs according scheme on Fig. 3a. The J - V curves measured under standard illumination (1000 W/m2, AM1.5G) as well as the IPCE data for standalone c-Si sample and for c-Si elements in combination with PSCs are shown on Fig. 3b and Fig. 3c. According to the IPCE spectra, tandem PSCs/c-Si systems provide efficient output in a wide range
(from 300 to 1000 nm) of solar spectrum. The performance of the bottom c-Si cells is shown to be nearly independent on the type of material used as photoelectrode in the top PSC (Fig. 3c).
Fig . 3. Scheme of four-terminal tandem PSC/c-Si solar cell (a), the IPCE spectra (b) and the J - V curves (c) for c-Si solar cell, PSCs with mesoscopic MO2 photoelectrodes (1 - TiO2, 2 - ZrO2, 3 -HfO2) and for c-Si in combination with PSC (T1 - PSC with TiO2, T2 - PSC with ZrO2, T3 - PSC with HfO2)
The PV parameters of the bottom c-Si cells and comparative charts, illustrating the relative contributions of both top and bottom sub-cells into the resulting PCE of tandem PSC/c-Si solar cells, are presented in Table 2 and Fig. 4. The overall conversion efficiency for all tandem systems is higher than for standalone c-Si and strongly depends on the top cell PCE. The best performance under standard illumination conditions (1000 W/m2, AM1.5G) was achieved for PSC based on mesoscopic ZrO2 photoelecrode in combination with c-Si. It was found to be 18.69%, which exceeded the PCE of a standalone c-Si solar cell by ~ 24%. The obtained data reveals that PSCs based on very wide-bandgap materials can be successfully used as top elements in tandem systems with the bottom c-Si cells and its allows to significantly increase the overall conversion efficiency. Also, mesoscopic ZrO2-based material can be an efficient alternative to standard TiO2 layer as photoelectrode for PSCs.
4. Conclusions
Photoelecrodes based on very wide-bandgap materials such as ZrO2 and HfO2 (Eg > 5 eV) were successfully used for fabrication of high efficient semi-transparent PSCs with the cell architecture of glass/FTO/c-TiO2/ZrO2 (or HfO2)/CH3NH3Pbl3/PTAA/PEDOT:PSS/FTO/glass under ambient conditions at high humidity levels (~ 40%). The best PCE of 12.72% (1000 W/m2, AM1.5G) was demonstrated by PSC samples with ZrO2 photoelectrode and it was 6.5% higher than for state-of-the-art TiO2-based device.
Fabricated PSCs were used as top elements in four-terminal tandem PSC/c-Si solar cells. Comparative analysis of PV parameters for bottom c-Si elements in combination with PSC based on TiO2, ZrO2 or HfO2 photoelectrodes revealed that the PCE value of a top cell was a major factor affecting the overall tandem cell performance. The best PCE was achieved for the tandem PSC/c-Si solar cell with PSC based on ZrO2 photoelectrode. It was found to be 18.69% (1000 W/m2, AM1.5G) and it exceeded the PCE value for a standalone c-Si solar cell by 24%.
Table 2. The PV characteristics of c-Si solar cells in combination with PSC devices (T1 - PSC with TiO2, T2 - PSC with ZrO2, T3 - PSC with HfO2)
Tandem type Jsc, mA/cm2 Voc, V FF, a.u. PCE, %
Standalone c-Si 40.79 ± 0.23 0.55 ± 0.02 0.68 ± 0.02 15.07 ± 0.11
T1 14.32 ± 0.14 0.53 ± 0.01 0.74 ± 0.01 5.61 ± 0.15
T2 15.10 ± 0.18 0.54 ± 0.02 0.74 ± 0.01 5.97 ± 0.22
T3 14.36 ± 0.19 0.54 ± 0.01 0.74 ± 0.02 5.71 ± 0.22
Fig. 4. Comparative diagrams for standalone c-Si solar cell and for four-terminal tandem PSC/c-Si solar cells (T1 - PSC with TiO2, T2 - PSC with ZrO2, T3 - PSC with HfO2)
The obtained results demonstrated that application of very wide-bandgap materials as photoelectrodes in PSCs allows not only to improve their performance under ambient conditions but also to increase significantly the overall conversion efficiency of four-terminal tandem PSC/c-Si solar cells.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research according to the research project No19-08-01042.
References
[1] Green M.A., Dunlop E.D., Hohl-Ebinger J., Yoshita M., Kopidakis N., Hao X. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 56). Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl., 2020, 28, NREL/JA-5900-77544.
[2] Battaglia C., Cuevas A., De Wolf S. High-efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells: status and perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9, P. 1552-1576.
[3] Yu Z., Leilaeioun M., Holman Z. Selecting tandem partners for silicon solar cells. Nat. Energy, 2016,1, P. 16137.
[4] Leijtens T., Bush K.A., Prasanna R., McGehee M.D. Opportunities and challenges for tandem solar cells using metal halide perovskite semiconductors. Nat. Energy, 2018, 3, P. 828-838.
[5] Park N.G. Research direction toward scalable, stable, and high efficiency perovskite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater., 2020,10(13), P. 1903106.
[6] Tejeda A., Choy W.C.H., Deleporte E., Graetzel M. Hybrid perovskites for photovoltaics and optoelectronics. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2020, 53(7), P. 070201.
[7] Ansari M.I.H., Qurashi A., Nazeeruddin M.K. Frontiers, opportunities, and challenges in perovskite solar cells: a critical review. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev., 2018, 35, P. 1-24.
[8] Jiang Y., Almansouri I., Huang S., Young T., Li Y., Peng Y., Hou Q., Spiccia L., Bach U., Cheng Y., Greena M.A., Ho-Baillie A. Optical analysis of perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, P. 5679-5689.
[9] Messmer C., Goraya B.S., Nold S., Schulze P.S., Sittinger V., Schon J., Goldschmidt J.C., Bivour M., Glunz S.W., Hermle M. The race for the best silicon bottom cell: efficiency and cost evaluation of perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells. Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3372.
[10] Dewi H.A., Wang H., Li J., Thway M., Sridharan R., Stangl R., Lin F., Aberle A.G., Mathews N., Bruno A., Mhaisalkar S. Highly efficient semitransparent perovskite solar cells for four terminal perovskite-silicon tandems. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(37), P. 3417834187.
[11] Chen B., Zheng X., Bai Y., Padture N.P., Huang J. Progress in tandem solar cells based on hybrid organic-inorganic perovskite. Adv. Energy Mater, 2017, 7, P. 1602400.
[12] Jaysankar M., Filipic M., Zielinski B., Schmager R., Song W., Qiu W., Paetzold U.W., Aernouts T., Debucquoy M., Gehlhaar R., Poortmans J. Perovskite-silicon tandem solar modules with optimized light harvesting. Energ. Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, P. 1489-1498.
[13] Loper P., Moon S.-J., de Nicolas S.M., Niesen B., Ledinsky M., Nicolay S., Bailat J., Yum J.-H., De Wolf S., Ballif C. Organic-inorganic halide perovskite/crystalline silicon four-terminal tandem solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, P. 1619-1629.
[14] Noh M.F.M., Teh C.H., Daik R., Lim E.L., Yap C.C., Ibrahim M.A., Ludin N.A., Yusoff A.R., Jange J., Teridi M.A.M. The architecture of the electron transport layer for a perovskite solar cell. J. Mater Chem. C, 2018, 6, P. 682-712.
[15] Wang K., Olthof S., Subhani W.S., Jiang X., Cao Y., Duan L., Wang H., Du M., Liu S. Novel inorganic electron transport layers for planar perovskite solar cells: progress and prospective. Nano Energy, 2020, 68, P. 104289.
[16] Mahmood K., Sarwar S., Mehran M.T. Current status of electron transport layers in perovskite solar cells: materials and properties. RSC Adv., 2017, 7, P. 17044-17062.
[17] Larina L.L., Alexeeva O.V., Almjasheva O.V., Gusarov V.V., Kozlov S.S., Nikolskaia A.B., Vildanova M.F., Shevaleevskiy O.I. Very wide-bandgap nanostructured metal oxide materials for perovskite solar cells. Nanosystems: Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, 2019, 10(1), P. 7075.
[18] Vildanova M.F., Nikolskaia A.B., Kozlov S.S., Shevaleevskiy O.I. Charge transfer mechanisms in multistructured photoelectrodes for perovskite solar cells. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2020, 1697, P. 012187.
[19] Heo H., Han H.J., Lee M., Song M., Kim D.H., Im S.H. Stable semi-transparent CH3NH3PM3 planar sandwich solar cells. Energ. Environ. Sci., 2015, 8(10), P. 2922.
[20] Chen B., Bai Y., Yu Z., Li T., Zheng X., Dong Q., Shen L., Boccard M., Gruverman A., Holman Z., Huang J. Efficient semitransparent perovskite solar cells for 23.0% efficiency perovskite/silicon four terminal tandem cells. Adv. Energy Mat., 2016, 6(19), P. 1601128.
[21] Vildanova M.F., Nikolskaia A.B., Kozlov S.S., Karyagina O.K., Larina L.L., Shevaleevskiy O.I., Almjasheva O.V., Gusarov V.V. Nanostructured ZrO2-Y2O3-based system for perovskite solar cells. Doklady Physical Chemistry, 2019, 484(2), P. 36-38.
[22] Nikolskaia A., Vildanova M., Kozlov S., Tsvetkov N., Larina L., Shevaleevskiy O. Charge transfer in mixed phase TiO2 photoelectrodes for perovskite solar cells. Sustainability, 2020,12, P. 788.
[23] Ito S., Chen P., Comte P., Nazeeruddin M.K., Liska P., Pechy P., Gratzel M. Fabrication of screen-printing pastes from TiO2 powders for dye?sensitized solar cells. Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl., 2007,15, P. 603-612.
[24] Nikolskaia A.B., Kozlov S.S., Vildanova M.F., Shevaleevskiy O.I. Power conversion efficiencies of perovskite and dye-sensitized solar cells under various solar radiation intensities. Semiconductors, 2019, 53(4), P. 540-544.
[25] Ahn N., Son D.-Y., Jang I.-H., Kang S.M., Choi M., Park N.-G. Highly reproducible perovskite solar cells with average efficiency of 18.3% and best efficiency of 19.7% fabricated via lewis base adduct of lead (II) iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015,137(27), P. 8696-8699.
