CC BY
16Развитие продуктивных навыков у студентов с высоким уровнем владения английским языком для участия в деловых переговорах при подготовке к Кембриджским экзаменам по бизнес английскому языку
Никитина Екатерина Викторовна,
кандидат филологических наук, старший преподаватель, ФГБОУ ВО «Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации»
E-mail: nikitina-ev@ranepa.ru
Липина Анна Алексеевна,
кандидат филологических наук, доцент, ФГБОУ ВО «Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации»
E-mail: lipina-aa@ranepa.ru
Козлова Маргарита Андреевна,
начальник отдела планирования и организации образовательного процесса, старший преподаватель, ФГБОУ ВО «Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации»
E-mail: kozlova-ma@ranepa.ru Фролова Кристина Эдуардовна,
старший преподаватель, ФГБОУ ВО «Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации» E-mail: frolova-ke@ranepa.ru
Калиничева Оксана Васильевна,
старший преподаватель, ФГБОУ ВО «Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации» E-mail: kalinicheva-ov@ranepa.ru
Данная работа направлена на развитие навыков разговорной речи студентов на деловом английском языке. Выбор данной темы обусловлен тем, что в настоящее время многие студенты стремятся работать в сфере бизнеса. Поэтому зарубежные университеты, как и мировые компании, требуют определенных деловых коммуникативных компетенций, которые включают в себя отличное знание грамматики, широкий спектр деловой лексики, правильное произношение и способность свободно вести диалог. Коммуникативные навыки обучающихся, не имеющих опыта участия в деловых встречах, развиваются в основном за счет разговорной практики. Общее впечатление от говорящего (Global Achievement) - это один из критериев кембриджской оценки, который позволяет определить, насколько навыки учащегося соответствуют уровню носителя языка. Таким образом, кандидаты, обладающие уровнями B2 и C1, должны уметь общаться на деловые темы без затруднений.
Ключевые слова: деловое общение, жанр, обучение грамматике, деловая лексика, интерактивное общение, управление дискурсом
о с
CJ
см о
Business meeting is one of the most popular genres in teaching and learning business language as it represents a combination of skills including not only the use of language but also awareness of business concepts and decision-making techniques which are widely applied in daily business interactions. Therefore, in teaching business English to pre-experienced learners it is highly important to let them acquire and develop necessary interactive skills for a business meeting which is the focus of this article.
The notion of a genre
Cambridge dictionary defines genre as "a style, especially in the arts, that involves a particular set of characteristics". Narrowed down to learning in any academic environment the concept of "genre" can be used to classify types of spoken or written discourse. While learning a language, students get involved in numerous speaking genres that imitate the use of language in real-life situations ranging from informal chitchats to formal business meetings. Traditionally genres are classified by content, language, purpose, and form. The number of speakers, context, purpose, level of formality, and many other features also define each genre. Speaking genres in business contexts include presentations, debates, seminars, workshops, and many others.
The genre of business meeting
Business meeting as a genre of business communication varies from formal meetings, with a chairperson and someone responsible for taking the minutes to informal ones in the form of chitchats during lunch breaks. Relationships between participants in a business meeting usually vary depending on their professional status, for instance from "partner to partner", "an employee to the boss", "a manager to a client" and so on. A variety of formats defines the choice of verbal and non-verbal means of communication. An essential aspect of teaching language for business meetings is cultural differences. Learners should take into account that "in some countries, a meeting is used to lay down the basis for consultation and discussion. In others, meetings are used primarily to present the boss's opinion or transmit corporate directives. In some cultures, meetings will follow a carefully organized plan, while in others the way they develop will depend on the issues raised or the people involved [12, p. 73]. In modeling business meetings to pre-ex-perienced learners, it is critical to remember that any meeting can go sideways, that is the agenda can be interrupted by urgent phone calls, private conversa-
tions, interruptions, and so on. So natural and fluent reactions to such diversions will also be expected from participants.
The focus of this article is the genre of a business meeting aimed at discussing and decision-making in a small group of speakers (from two to three) which can be well trained on the basis of BEC Speaking part 3. The participants of such a meeting need to be able to hold a conversation (time is limited for BEC Part 3 in particular), express their opinion, compare and contrast and acknowledge their partner's contributions. Additionally, as a genre "focuses on conventional structures used to construct a complete text within the variety" [3, p.2], certain lexical, grammatical, and phonological structures characteristic of a business meeting were analyzed to provide an overview of the genre of a business meeting.
Further, in the article teaching participation in a business meeting will be discussed through various aspects of this task.
Native speakers in business meetings
Knowledge of how specific genres are realized is part of the linguistic awareness that speakers in a particular speech community share [8, p. 14]. So, before discussing the listed above learning issues of pre-experienced learners (levels B2-C1) in participation in business meetings it is always reasonable to look at the way native speakers hold business meetings to set a certain standard for further assessment of speaking abilities of learners. According to a «Cambridge English Qualifications. Business Certificates. Handbook for teachers» when assessing the Speaking part of a test of the candidates, the assessor awards marks by applying performance descriptors from the analytical assessment scale:
• Grammar and vocabulary
• Pronunciation
• Discourse management
• Interactive Communication
According to the BEC Higher assessment scale, a C1 speaker "maintains control of a wide range of grammatical forms" [6, p. 19]. B2 learners already have at their disposal a substantial set of grammatical means to convey their thoughts and ideas successfully. However, there are certain typical spoken structures employed by proficient speakers and unknown to B2 learners. Such structures as tag questions, for instance, are extremely common in speaking performing "a primarily interpersonal function' [5, p.20]. Besides, correct and appropriate usage of some grammatical forms indicates the level of the learner's competence as such forms refer to C1 or C2 levels of CEFR. CEFR gives quite a general description of levels, so to get a deeper understanding of the specifics of speaking in business meetings we have conducted an analysis of business interaction between two native speakers performing BEC speaking task.
The result of the analysis has proved that there exist a number of specific language features which are not usually taught or explained in Business English textbooks.
Thus, it was found out that native speakers naturally choose vocabulary depending on the level of formality of the business meeting and their relationship with other participants. They tend to use the most common expressions, which sometimes are not even taught in business English coursebooks. According to Evan Frendo in "Teaching business speaking skills" "many business English coursebooks have presented language that can seem stilted or unnatural". For example, textbooks may teach a more elaborated language for interrupting like "Excuse me, can I interrupt" instead of "but". While it is suggested that people should give opinions by saying "In my opinion", native speakers would just say "I think". Research has shown that key language items in such cases are words like "Ok? (meaning "Do you agree?") [12, p.73].
Now, turning to the phonological nature of spontaneous business conversations, it was ascertained that a wide variety of intonation patterns are frequently used. Discourse management for native speakers tends to be diverse with a well-thought selection of discourse management strategies and markers. They are able to concentrate on planning the dialogue, they have the ability to appropriately choose cohesive devices and discourse markers, taking the leading role in the dialogue where it is reasonable to take it, they are prone to pass on information, persuade, justify, defend interlocutors' position, argue, clarify and summarize.
Pronunciation, as one of the assessment criteria, is often neglected while teaching pre-experienced learners. Nevertheless, it is crucial for learners not only to articulate sounds clearly but also to identify intonation patterns and word stress, sentence stress, and other phonetic phenomena because they can be meaningful and convey diverse shades of meaning.
Interactive communication refers to the "ability to use language to achieve meaningful communication" [6, p.18]. Proficient speakers are able to interact with ease, linking contributions to those of other speakers. They initiate and respond appropriately to the conversation, widening the scope of the interaction. In addition to the above, they successfully negotiate towards an outcome.
Teaching Grammar for business meetings
A sample video of native speakers performing the BEC speaking part 3 task and several samples of B2 learners doing similar tasks having been analyzed, a range of grammatical structures are identified to be employed at level C1 to hold a business meeting.
First of all, during business meetings, it is essential to be able to express a personal attitude to the subject discussed or the solution suggested or the opinion expressed. For such purposes, modal verbs serve as an effective means. Surprisingly, modal verbs are more common in spoken than in written registers; they are "an important characteristic of conversation" [3, p.94].
B2 learners appear not only to stick to a limited set of modal verbs but also to overuse certain structures and modal words such as:
C3
o
CO "O
1=1 A
—I
o
C3 t; o m o
OT
3
u o
CO
1) We should.... - to express suggestion or recommendation
2) Maybe we can. - to express possibility
3) Probably .... - to express probability.
4) They need to have.... - to express obligation
Pre-experienced speakers almost never use modal verbs to make a deduction, to criticize, to express doubt, to make a guess or offer. They also avoid using complex modal forms with the perfect infinitive (must have done/been, couldn't have done/been, etc.)
The solution presupposes not only doing grammar exercises [4, p.99] but also both controlled and free speaking activities during which learners practice modal verbs for certain communicative functions.
Secondly, in the process of business communication, each speaker tries to convince his partner of some idea or opinion. The trite way for B2 learners is to ask: "Do you agree with me?". However, there exists a way which is another characteristic feature of spoken register. S. Thornbury states that "... with question tags the speaker makes a direct appeal for the listener's agreement, consent and so on." [8, p.20]. Also, tag questions can be used to "reinforce, extend, elaborate, or clarify the main message." [9 p.92]. So, the solution is to teach pre-experienced learners to use tag-questions for the stated above functions. Attention should be paid to the intonation of the tag.
Example task 1. Complete the discussion of a new online brochure using question tags
Example task 2. Look at your company's logo. Persuade your colleague that it needs changing. Use tag questions to appeal to his/her agreement. [16, pp.111, 114]
Thirdly, during business meetings, the issues of the agenda are discussed and a definite solution is supposed to be offered. So, learners should be able to suggest their ideas and speculate on the consequences of suggested options using appropriate grammatical means for that aim.
Favored by B2 learners is the structure "What do you think about it?" to elicit their partner's ideas on the subject discussed and the phrase "I suggest that.." to introduce their options. They also use Conditional 1 to talk about the future consequences of the discussed solution.
The suggested solution is to practice Conditionals 2, 3, and other ways of talking about hypothetical situations to enlarge the scope of means exploited by learners, and to help them move up to the next CEFR level.
The site www.englishprofile.org provides typical, worldwide grammar profiles for each level of the CE-FR, so for C1-C2 levels the following grammatical structures are enumerated:
1) If it were+to infinitive (formal condition)
2) Inverted "should" +would in the main clause (it is 5 formal and polite, used to express future possible out-5 comes)
ZZ 3) If it weren't for + would in the main clause ° 4) Other ways to introduce if-clauses: providing/ 1 provided that, suppose/supposing that
Example task 1. James Elroy specializes in financial analysis for the airline industry. Read his notes for a client report. Write sentences for the actual report using if... were to.
1. The UK economy might slow down - spending on travel fall
If the UK economy were to slow down, spending on travel would fall. [16, p 95]
Example task 2. Answer the following question using conditional clauses:
Would you be ready to relocate? Under what circumstances?
Example task 3. Rewrite the sentences starting with the words given. Make any necessary changes to keep the same meaning.
1. If we had a good view, our office would be perfect.
If it weren't...... [4, pp. 96, 99]
Finally, to highlight the key idea or to purposefully emphasize some important message speakers resort to different means. As for grammatical ones, B2 learners mostly use the structure "It is important/crucial/essential that."
The suggested solution is to take advantage of cleft sentences as an emphatic structure. Cleft sentences may be also used to give an explanation or to contrast ideas.
Teaching vocabulary for business meetings
Vocabulary is one of the most complicated aspects for learners as there is not a big difference between Level B2 and C1 in assessing lexical resources. The ability to use a wide range of appropriate vocabulary to give and exchange views on familiar and unfamiliar topics implies not just the range of vocabulary but also awareness of register and business concepts, idioms, colloquialisms, or business slang which must be incorporated naturally in the speech flow. Practicing language through controlled practice to free practice is crucial for pre-experi-enced learners of these levels.
Thus, in learning the language of meetings students of Level B2 and C1 sometimes lack knowledge of certain common lexical items which refer to different levels of formality of the meeting. It means that while teaching this type of language one must provide learners with relevant up-to-date vocabulary items most common among native speakers, businessmen in particular. A solution to this can be regular watching business news (BBC, CNN websites, etc.) or watching films with episodes of business meetings focusing on natural reactions and choice of the vocabulary of the participants. For example, The Laundromat, The Suits, The Good Wife, Younger, The Bold Type, The Dragon Den (BBC 2 show).
Giving and exchanging views on the topic during a business meeting involves minor language functions such as persuading, justifying, arguing, and clarifying. To facilitate fluent communication learners should develop these skills through language as well. To help weaker learners identify the function of the language it can be useful to practice matching exercises in which
individual commentaries of speakers during a meeting should be related to their function (expressing agreement, making a suggestion, etc.) with further use of these in dialogues.
Therefore, a typical task to master automaticity in recognizing the function and using the proper language for it is like this: "Practice responding to what your partners say about the topic. Match the appropriate response (A-H) to the statements (1-8). The full text of the exercise [1, p 89].
1. I think we should include articles from each division A. But they tell us those are already on the staff noticeboard
2. I'd like to see people making suggestions how to improve the company B. Good idea, but she might not think its important enough.
3. It would be good to advertise company training events C. I agree. Ideally something from them every couple of months or so.
4. Do you think people would like information about new members of staff? D. Yes, I do. People are always interested in where people have worked before.
For learners of levels B2 and C1, it is essential to be able to vary expressions from less aggressive to more natural or polite. [14, p 120]
For learners of level C1, one of the solutions to train these skills is organizing a meeting role-play, in which learners are given a model situation with background information or a case and a role card with a number of phrases that should be used in a meeting. For example, the role can imply that a learner only agrees with others during this model roleplay, but every time uses a different phrase for this. In the next round, the same learner is given a role in which he or she has to interrupt other speakers. There are numerous variations of such roleplays or case studies almost in all business coursebooks aimed at B2 or C1 learners. For example, Market Leader, Business Benchmark, etc. Apart from these designed roleplays a teacher can ask learners to use some authentic materials, such as minutes of a real meeting or an e-mail to further discuss the outcomes and enlarge vocabulary. [12, p 75]
Though simulation is a good way to learn language functions, learning idioms and business slang enlarges the lexical range a lot. Teaching synonymous collocations with the word "meeting" (for example, "attend a meeting" instead of "go to a meeting', "put back a meeting' instead of "postpone a meeting' will give learners better flexibility in a meeting. [14, p 117] Quite often learners do not know how to express their attitude to the result of the meeting and answering a question "How was the meeting?" stick to general attitudes like "good" or "bad". The solution is to teaching them vocabulary in pairs of opposites like "digressions" - "useful discussion", "productive" - "waste of time", "keep things moving'- "wander off the topic'.
Another problem that pre-experienced learners face in this context is a lack of knowledge about the actual procedure of a typical meeting, so teaching them con-
cepts like "the minutes", "the agenda", "a time-keeper', "accurate record", "the venue" and such will help a lot in understanding the timing of the meeting. At Level C1 or B2, most vocabulary exercises will be based on the substitution of basic vocabulary items with more sophisticated ones. [14, p. 119]
While going through BEC speaking task 3 learners have quickly to decide on their roles and make a plan of a three-minute discussion, which can be quite a challenge for people without job experience or for shy people. To help learners to take more initiative and make them feel less constrained by the task, teaching synonymic phrases opening the meeting ("Lefs make a start'/Ok, lefs get started"), inviting a partner to speak ("Would you like to kick offT'/Perhaps, you'd like to get the ball rolling?", and expressing an opinion ("The way I see it./What are your feeling on this..?) can be a solution.
Teaching Discourse management in business meetings
Knowing how to organize and connect individual utterances, as well as how to map this knowledge onto the turn-taking structures of interactive talk, is called discourse competence [8, pp. 14-15]
Discourse Management is one of the four essential criteria to assess a candidate's speaking abilities. For a C1 (advanced) level one has to:
• Produce extended stretches of language with very little hesitation,
• Make contributions that are relevant,
• Organize ideas clearly,
• Use a range of cohesive devices and discourse markers.
For a B2 (upper-intermediate) level one may:
• Produce extended stretches of language despite some hesitation,
• Make contributions that are relevant and use very little repetition,
• Use a range of cohesive devices.
When participating in the 3rd part of BEC (a 3-min-ute business meeting of 2 candidates) the speaker has to concentrate on planning the dialogue, choosing cohesive devices and discourse markers, taking the leading role in the dialogue, passing on information, persuading, justifying, defending interlocutors' position, arguing, clarifying, summarizing.
Typically learners of upper-intermediate level have the following problems: using (choosing appropriate) cohesive devices, keeping up a conversation, knowing how to interrupt a partner, moderating a discussion.
So the teachers' role is to increase cultural awareness of students for them to learn to recognize their roles in the interaction, have awareness of participant's functions, (e.g. an HR manager, a finance manager, a CEO, a staff member, etc.), and teach them to become able to act it out.
Example tasks to solve this problem: "You are all attending a conference on customer care at a large hotel in New York. You all meet in the
C3
o
CO "O
1=1 A
—I
o
C3 t; o m O OT
3
u o
CO
o d
oj o
CM
hotel restaurant and find yourself at the same table. You must introduce yourself and have a conversation. Find out two things you have in common."
Then below there are roles to act out. Some of them are:
■ Manager of a five-star hotel,
■ Sales Supervisor in a large department store,
■ Manager of a regional branch of a bank,
■ Owner of a chain of prestigious hairdressing salons,
■ Head of Customer Service in a mobile phone company
■ Etc.
When we study the problem of lack of cohesive devices (students are overusing the same ones: so, because, also, and, like, maybe, etc.), we should think about solving this issue by giving students - on a permanent basis - practice tasks and a list of necessary devices and then start to use them in their speaking 'trials' of these 'business meetings'.
Example tasks with controlled practice:
"Complete the extracts from a presentation with the following phrases:
Moving on, in brief, in other words, sum up, for instance, as you can see
Our company has always had a reputation for inventiveness - 1_, we were the first to develop
a viable biodegradable alternative to plastic. And we're
an innovative company, 2_, we're the type
of organization that responds to challenges by finding original solutions.
Before 3_to the next point, I'd like to
say a few words about our financial performance -
4_from this slide, we've increased our
profit margins for the last year by 1.5 percent.
Before I conclude this talk, I'm going to
5_the main points that I have mentioned
here this morning: 6_we're young, we're
dynamic and, most important of all, we're profitable." [19, p. 110]
Or the type of a freer practice speaking task:
"Imagine you are giving a brief talk at a business meeting. Take it in turns to explain what you think is important when making a business phone call in English. Try to talk for a minute. As in a business meeting, your partner should listen and not comment until you have finished.
Useful language (to use when speaking - authors' note):
...The most important thing is... because...
For example,.
Another thing which is important is...
For instance,.
Finally, you should."
For more examples [5, p. 22]
This way in students' speech these words will start to be replaced: 'and' will be replaced by words like: moreover, as well as, together with, likewise, similarly furthermore, etc. 'Because' will be changed into: "as a result, under those circumstances, for this reason, henceforth, thus, hence, therefore", etc.
This way the list can be enlarged, and students' cohesion will be improved.
There is another factor that needs to be taken into consideration. When improving students' discourse management, we need to teach students some interaction strategies (how to paraphrase, to use some formulaic expressions, language chunks, how to begin and end a meeting, how to agree and disagree, how to pass on information, persuade, justify, defend their position, argue, clarify and summarize).
Example tasks to solve the problem of, for instance, using formulaic expressions and language chunks:
"Complete this paragraph using words from the box in the appropriate from: be, fit, land, run, sweat, take
Mel was surprised but happy to 1_a job
on her local newspaper as soon as she left university. She was surprised because she didn't feel that she 2_the job description, but she was happy because she had always dreamt of working as a journalist. So she didn't really mind when she found that she was spending much of her time 3_errands for the editor. Her brother said she was just being used as 4_labor but she felt confident that
there 5_good prospects for her there. She was
sure she would soon have the chance to 6_on
more responsibility." [16, pp.31-32]
Example tasks to solve the problem of usage of interaction strategies for agreeing or disagreeing, giving opinions and so on might be: "Role-play this situation.
Jeanne de Brion is a jewelry company in Boston. USA. A year ago. it launched a line of jewelry with the brand name Cecile-. This is the name of the French designer who created the collection. Unfortunately. the Cecile line has not achieved its sales targets. Three directors of the company meet to discuss how to improve sales.
Work in groups of three, Read your role cards, study the Useful language box and then role-play the discussion.
USEFUL LANGUAGE
ASK- GIVING AGREE- DISAGREEING MAKING
ING FOR OPINIONS ING SUGGES-
OPIN- TIONS
IONS
How do I think /I Thafs I see / know I think we
you feel don't think true, what should reduce
about that's I agree. you mean. but our prices.
that? a good Absolute- I think How about
What idea. ly. there's a special pro-
do you In my Exactly. a problem. motion?
think? opinion. I think I'm not so Why don't we
Whafs we need so. too. sure. talk to the big
your new prod- Maybe. but stores?
view? ucts. thafs not Maybe / Per-
enough. haps
we could offer
incentives.
For more examples of tasks [10, p.11]
All these strategies when studied by students will color and transform the speech 'pulling' it higher from a B2 (upper-intermediate) to a C1 (advanced)
level, which initially was the point for students to learn. They will start producing extended stretches of language with very little hesitation (the hesitation will disappear with the help of students' knowing paraphrasing tactics, using formulaic expressions, and so on), the students' contributions will become more relevant (as their cultural awareness will improve), and they will organize ideas clearly and use a range of cohesive devices and discourse markers.
Teaching interactive communication in business meetings
Meaningful communication presupposes topic management and turn taking whilst negotiating towards an outcome. Learners should be familiar with the rules and skills of maintaining and developing communication:
1. to avoid long silences
2. to recognize the appropriate moment to get a turn
3. to signal the wish to speak and to recognize other speakers' signals
4. to yield the turn
5. to communicate meaning
6. to listen actively when other speakers are speaking Interactional moves may be signaled by a range of
phrases to link the speaker's contribution to those of other speakers, e.g. Well, I had a different experience; That reminds me of...; By the way; Like I say. Also, interactional moves in a business meeting can be formally signaled by, for example, the raising of one's hand.
Successful interaction does not rely on words alone. The interactional use of eye gaze, smile, gesture, facial expression is known as paralinguistics [9, p.9]. For instance, a smile and a nod signal approval, a raising of the shoulders indicate the wish to take a turn. Learners should make sure to be aware of these paralinguistic signals.
Learners often have difficulty addressing pragmatic aspects of communication, namely, negotiating meaning during an interaction. The suggested solution is to familiarize learners with "strategic behaviors that learners use when facing communication problems during interactional tasks" [9, p.65]. Competent language learners use them in order to find alternative ways of expressing their meaning by processing time and keeping their turn in conversation [9, p. 66]:
1. Exemplification (offering an example to make one's point clearer)
2. Confirmation checks (asking listeners whether they have understood the message)
3. Comprehension checks (paraphrasing what is heard to confirm one's understanding)
4. Repetition (repeating of all or part of what is said to check one's own understanding)
5. Clarification requests (asking the speaker to explain the point further)
6. Repetition requests (asking the speaker to say something again)
7. Exemplification requests (asking the speaker to give an example)
Another typical problem is that learners lack the skill of active listening, which is essential for maintaining interaction. The solution is to teach learners active listening techniques to facilitate the communication process.
Example task 1,2. [11, p. 65]
Conclusion
Speaking ability of pre-experienced learners to participate in business meetings is developed mostly by authentic speaking practice. Global achievement is the final part of Cambridge assessment which relates the learner to the native speaker. Thus, speakers of levels B2 and C1 should be able to handle communication on business topics despite some hesitation. Such speech characteristics as coherence, ability to express complex ideas, self-correction, and ability to produce extended discourse are all well trained with the help of a whole range of tasks promoting automaticity and confidence in speaking.
HELPING HIGH-LEVEL LEARNERS TO DEVELOP SPEAKING SKILLS IN BUSINESS MEETINGS BASED ON CAMBRIDGE BUSINESS ENGLISH EXAMS
Nikitina E.V., Lipina A.A., Kozlova M.A., Frolova K.E., Kalinicheva O.V.
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
The following paper is aimed at developing students' business English speaking skills. The choice of this topic is conditioned by the fact that many students nowadays are eager to work in the business sphere. Therefore, foreign universities, as well as global companies, require certain business communicative competencies, which include excellent knowledge of grammar, wide range of business vocabulary, proper pronunciation, and an ability to produce extended discourse. Speaking ability of pre-experienced learners to participate in business meetings is developed mostly by authentic speaking practice. Global achievement is the final part of Cambridge assessment, which relates the learner to the native speaker. Thus, speakers of levels B2 and C1 should be able to handle communication on business topics despite some hesitation.
Keywords: business communication, genre, teaching grammar, business vocabulary, interactive communication, discourse management.
References
1. Allsop J., Aspinall T., Oxford, 2004, Testbuilder BEC Vantage, Macmillan
2. Baker A, UK, 2006. Ship or Sheep. An intermediate pronunciation course. Third edition, Cambridge University Press
3. Biber D., Conrad S. 2009. Register, Genre and Style
4. Brook-Hart G., UK, 2007, Business Benchmark Advanced, Student's book, First edition, Cambridge University Press
5. Brook-Hart G., UK, 2014. Business Benchmark. Upper Intermediate. 2nd edition. Cambridge English
6. Business Higher 5, 2012, Cambridge University Press
7. Cambridge dictionary online. Available at: https://dictionary. cambridge.org/ru/ (Accessed 15 September 2021)
8. Cambridge English Qualifications. Business Certificates. Handbook for teachers. Cambridge English. UK. 2019
9. Christine C.M. Goh, Burns A..2012, Teaching speaking: A holistic approach, Cambridge University Press
10. Cotton D., Ralvey D., Kent S., UK, 2014. Market Leader. Business English Course Book. Intermediate, 3rd edition, Pearson Education Limited
11. E. de Chazal, Allison J. Appleby R., 2013, The Business. Advanced. Macmillan
12. Frendo E., England, 2012. How to teach Business English. Pearson Education Limited.
13. English Profile. Available at: http://www.englishprofile.org (accessed 15 September 2021)
C3
o
CO "O
1=1 A
—I
o
C3 t; o m O OT
3
u o
CO
14. Mascull B., Cambridge, 2002, Business Vocabulary in Use. Cambridge University Press.
15. McCarthy, McCarten J., Clark D., Clark R., 2012. Grammar for Business. Cambridge University Press
16. O'Dell F., McCarthy M., UK, 2014. English Collocations in Use. Advanced, Cambridge University Press
17. O'Keeffe M., Dubichka I., 2006, Market Leader Advanced, Coursebook Longman
18. Thornbury S., 2005. How to teach speaking, Pearson Education ESL
19. Trappe T., Tullis G., UK, 2011. Intelligent Business. Coursebook. Upper Intermediate.Pearson Education Limited.
o d
u
OJ
o>
